[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / boo / beat / com / fat / job / lit / mph / map / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
politics

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 98346)
Message
File  []
close
gordon raepface.jpg
983469834698346
>> No. 98346 Anonymous
24th February 2024
Saturday 8:24 pm
98346 spacer
>We run the trains! Ooohh we want more money!
>Then we'll get behind the desk and treat you like shit because you're ticket's wrong!
>And do random improvement works that herd you onto buses wheree you still pay full price!
They should be paid more money but they're also a bunch of incompetent dogfuckers. Fuck em! Pay them the cash to shut them the fuck up!
Expand all images.
>> No. 98347 Anonymous
24th February 2024
Saturday 9:35 pm
98347 spacer
I think the strikes are wrong while negotiations are still under way, that the government has acted in a reckless and provocative manner, and that it's time for both sides to put aside the rhetoric and get round the negotiating table.
>> No. 98348 Anonymous
24th February 2024
Saturday 9:44 pm
98348 spacer
>>98347

Cheers Kier.
>> No. 98349 Anonymous
25th February 2024
Sunday 12:26 am
98349 spacer
>>98346
Cunts the lot of them. Needs an enormous amount of money throwing at it, and nobody has the fucking balls to do anything because everyone involved is a cunt.
>> No. 98350 Anonymous
25th February 2024
Sunday 9:40 am
98350 spacer
>>98347
OP here. I hope you were joking because while it can in theory work, the negotiations are literally just that, and you don't back down until you get some of what you want. To generalise.

However, the way quite a lot of public sector workers treat the public (with the exception of the NHS and Fire Services) is with incompetence, so they don't deserve more money; it's just that it's more wrong to exploit people by paying them unlivable wages and that has to stop. I really hate the strikes, but I support them regardless. Duality of man etc.
>> No. 98351 Anonymous
25th February 2024
Sunday 9:41 am
98351 spacer
Also, sorry for the rant; just had a bad day yesterday involving said trains.
>> No. 98352 Anonymous
25th February 2024
Sunday 1:45 pm
98352 spacer
>>98350

>it's just that it's more wrong to exploit people by paying them unlivable wages and that has to stop

ASLEF members earn £59k on average.
>> No. 98353 Anonymous
25th February 2024
Sunday 2:47 pm
98353 spacer
>>98352
Go home, Grant. Don't you have some alts to maintain?
>> No. 98354 Anonymous
25th February 2024
Sunday 2:54 pm
98354 spacer
>>98352
OP here. Sauce pls.
>> No. 98355 Anonymous
25th February 2024
Sunday 3:28 pm
98355 spacer
>>98354

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/61840077
>> No. 98356 Anonymous
25th February 2024
Sunday 4:03 pm
98356 spacer
>>98355
>We asked the Department for Transport (DfT) how it got to this [median] figure and it initially said it had taken the median figures from the ONS for four categories of rail workers, added them up and divided by four
LOL
>> No. 98357 Anonymous
25th February 2024
Sunday 4:39 pm
98357 spacer
>>98356

According to the ONS, train drivers earn an average of £59k. ASLEF only represents drivers, not other rail staff; it's ASLEF that are going on strike next week, not the RMT.

Cleaners and other low-paid workers on the railways can legitimately argue that they're struggling to make ends meet, but drivers absolutely cannot. They are well paid by any reasonable standard.
>> No. 98358 Anonymous
26th February 2024
Monday 1:46 am
98358 spacer
>>98357
>They are well paid by any reasonable standard.
And how exactly do you think that came to be?

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password