[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
dandy

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 5949)
Message
File  []
close
ghey.jpg
594959495949
>> No. 5949 Anonymous
20th January 2019
Sunday 12:00 pm
5949 spacer
.
Expand all images.
>> No. 5950 Anonymous
20th January 2019
Sunday 12:16 pm
5950 spacer
I don't know what you're expecting in response to this.
>> No. 5951 Anonymous
20th January 2019
Sunday 12:55 pm
5951 spacer
>>5949
You look great but I don't like those wellies.
>> No. 5952 Anonymous
20th January 2019
Sunday 1:21 pm
5952 spacer
You look like you've very recently found out your estranged great aunt owns a farm and you're off to try and ingratiate yourself with her before it's too late
>> No. 5953 Anonymous
20th January 2019
Sunday 2:58 pm
5953 spacer
Sigh.

That's Igor Gutman, a mentally-ill Canadian who's something of a meme over at the new German Place. There's a Brit who I've noticed enjoys crossposting a lot of his idiotic threads over here, typically with little or no comment in the thread itself. The /iq/ thread about Kyriakos Grizzly is another of them, and I'd wager he's responsible for a lot of the MRA-tinged discussion about the perils of finding love when you're not a 10/10 Chad with perfect bone structure. It's very tedious and I wish he'd stop.
>> No. 5954 Anonymous
20th January 2019
Sunday 4:57 pm
5954 spacer
>>5953
> about the perils of finding love when you're not a 10/10 Chad with perfect bone structure.

Talk about perils, there's that story about some poor sod who dumped about thirty grand into plastic surgery to correct his perceivedly flawed looks.

You may guess how well that worked with relative ease. It's a really terrible irony.

Sage for not contributing anything of value.
>> No. 5955 Anonymous
20th January 2019
Sunday 5:35 pm
5955 spacer
>>5954

The saddest part about the chaps who subscribe to this is that even if you tell them that genuinely, they look pretty good, they just think you're lying or trying to be nice, because that's exactly how they operate as Nice Guys.

I still haven't decided if I feel sorry for them or if they're just useless cunts. From my experience trying to talk to some of them on here, they just don't seem interested in listening to someone else's ideas.

Sage for stating the obvious
>> No. 5957 Anonymous
25th January 2019
Friday 4:19 pm
5957 spacer
>>5955
> even if you tell them that genuinely, they look pretty good, they just think you're lying or trying to be nice, because that's exactly how they operate as Nice Guys.

I can sort of relate and understand them, frankly.
>> No. 5958 Anonymous
25th January 2019
Friday 5:22 pm
5958 spacer
>>5957
Seek counselling.
>> No. 5959 Anonymous
25th January 2019
Friday 5:53 pm
5959 spacer

hotfuzz17.png
595959595959
>>5958
Maybe he's fuckugly?
>> No. 5962 Anonymous
12th February 2019
Tuesday 11:49 am
5962 spacer
>>5958
You obviously have never been told white lies.
>> No. 5963 Anonymous
12th February 2019
Tuesday 1:00 pm
5963 spacer

comicpowers.png
596359635963
>>5962
I saw this yesterday and it bothers me.
>> No. 5964 Anonymous
12th February 2019
Tuesday 1:47 pm
5964 spacer
>>5953
The new German place?
>> No. 5965 Anonymous
12th February 2019
Tuesday 1:52 pm
5965 spacer
>>5964
Just that they're lying to the guy about liking his hat, encouraging him to keep wearing a stupid hat that will make people laugh at him.
>> No. 5966 Anonymous
12th February 2019
Tuesday 2:22 pm
5966 spacer
>>5965

I think the dad likes the hat. Or at least likes it as an expression of the hat guy's personality.

Are you a judgemental prick by chance? I only ask because the people who I know who are most insecure in themselves are judgemental pricks and can't take a complements at face value because I think they believe everyone is secretly as judgemental as them. Also because your first thought about the man's interesting hat was that it was stupid.

People are probably less judgemental than you think. The halo effect means that you can get away with pretty much anything as long as you shine brightly in some other capacity.
>> No. 5967 Anonymous
12th February 2019
Tuesday 2:28 pm
5967 spacer
>>5965

The person wouldn't have worn the hat if they didn't like it. Even if the dad doesn't really care for the hat or perhaps just wouldn't wear it himself, the support he offers is genuine.
>> No. 5969 Anonymous
12th February 2019
Tuesday 2:44 pm
5969 spacer

qed.png
596959695969
>>5966
>your first thought about the man's interesting hat was that it was stupid
No, my first thought was to actually read the comic in question and see that the hat is described as "ugly".

As for "judgemental pricks" being insecure, how do you think people get insecure? It might have something to do with, y'know, other people being critical of them. But yeah why not blame insecure people for being the result of other people's behaviour.
>> No. 5970 Anonymous
12th February 2019
Tuesday 3:12 pm
5970 spacer
>>5969

> yeah why not blame insecure people for being the result of other people's behaviour.


Ah I see you are a dialectic materialist. You know not even Hegal himself believed such principals should apply to the self and to personal happiness.

Let me put it another way. You can sit there like an entitled snowflake complaining about how your perception is the product of your environment and that it's not your fault and that the whole world needs to change as you aren't personally responsible for your own psyche.

Or you can grab life by the reigns and decide to try make a change yourself starting with yourself. Really no one else can. This really isn't an exercise in who is at fault but who is in a better position to fix the situation and what is easier to solve. And quite frankly you fixing you and going from there is a lot more realistic then some nebulous decree the whole system needs to change whilst actually propping up the system yourself and not claiming any responsibility for it or yourself and your own toxic thought patterns.
>> No. 5971 Anonymous
12th February 2019
Tuesday 3:46 pm
5971 spacer
>>5970
I'm terribly sorry that my reading what a cartoon character said and then repeating it has upset your feelings.

It's interesting that your first thought on reading that is "This person is insecure, I'd better call him a prick".
>> No. 5972 Anonymous
12th February 2019
Tuesday 3:58 pm
5972 spacer
>>5971


I asked you if you were a judgemental prick, but now that we have accepted you are, what are we going to do about it. Because I think you would be more happy and less insecure if you weren't.
>> No. 5973 Anonymous
12th February 2019
Tuesday 4:01 pm
5973 spacer
>>5972

You can still just admit you didn't read the comic before you made a judgement about me based on what I said and what you didn't know.
>> No. 5974 Anonymous
12th February 2019
Tuesday 4:18 pm
5974 spacer
>>5973
I had read the comic previously and had skimmed over it the 'ugly' part my mistake. I admit that.

I still don't think the comic is a bad message, as my stance about the expression of the persons personality stands. But I understand your perspective better.
>> No. 5975 Anonymous
12th February 2019
Tuesday 4:29 pm
5975 spacer
>>5974

Okay then, that's fine. Clearly the guy is well intentioned, I just find the situation a little unintentionally iffy.
>> No. 5976 Anonymous
13th February 2019
Wednesday 8:12 pm
5976 spacer
>>5949

Looks alright to me.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password