>>14411
Literal shitposting on a SFW board. There already is a thread for supplicants, too. Maybe just lurk about a bit, eh? Now naf off, you toerag.

>>14412

>Literal shitposting on a SFW board.

What dark twisted days are these when /IQ/ has become a safespace.

>>14413

Not a safespace, read the content, it's still horrific.

Just no images that'll get me fired, thanks

>>14414

Can I have a it back if the picture gets linked instead of hosted?

Why don't you go for a walk or something? Fucking wanker.

>>14414

>Just no images that'll get me fired, thanks

I reiterate. What dark twisted days are these when /IQ/ has become a safespace?

>>14417
You've turned up years too late to have this argument.

>>14415
Contrary to what you may have been led to believe, /IQ/ is not a shitposting board and no one wants to see your shit.

/fat/ would be the place to link it if you want a critique if you're worried about something, that Scottish poo witch probably lurks there she'll want samples so be forewarned, but from what I can remember it looked perfectly normal.

I know I'm probably going to regret asking this, but why on earth do you want to show people your shit like a proud toddler wanting a round of applause?

>>14418

Probably, I feel like this is one of those midlife crysis things where you wake up one day and realise ever so slowly that you didn't even process it everything has changed from how it used to be and you can't go back.

>>14419

I wanted a round of applause, or some sick burns.

>>14421

Nobody gives a shit about your shit.

>>14422

I do.

>>14422

I do.

Didn't someone recently post their shit on /art/ but because it was /art/ that was considered OK?

>>14425
I believe you may be thinking of these.

>>14425

I seem to remember a turd in a shower.

>>14427
It was someone trolling the photography thread.

Is there anything inherently NSFW about a going to the toilet? It might be embarrassing to have on you browser history but so is /iq/. The views and opinions expressed there if taken seriously would get you a HR meeting. I'm not trying to challenge the boundaries it just doesn't seem like something that is immediately obvious as being NSFW apart from that it is taboo and a bit yucky. It isn't sexual or violent.

And I'd hate to think Pingu was more badass than /iq/


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_4-zJMMAqg

>>14429
>Is there anything inherently NSFW about a going to the toilet?
I don't know, m7. On Monday go to your boss's desk while he's sat there, drop your keks, take a massive dump on the desk in front of him and see what he says.

>>14430

Or just show him a Polaroid of your last bowel movement. I'm sure he'll be thrilled.

>>14430

Okay, but he considers it acceptable to piss and shit on his time, but making long political rants and gossiping about which celebrity got raped last would be wasting time and inappropriate in the workplace.

>>14429
>>14432
Allow me to stick my oar in: I think 'NSFW' has become a more general term to refer to vulgar image content you don't want to see everytime you browse. You see, there is a cultural divide between discussing a subject in detail and photographic imagery which might require mind bleach.

The idea of Britfags being SFW is a bit of a push taken literally (the name does contain a slur) but we should still be keeping up appearances. When are we all going to post our cocks on /y/ anyway.

>>14433

The idea of britfa.gs being sfw is that there's a /sfw/ and IQ is on there. We all know what sfw means no matter how much we want to be smart arsed and try to define it. No orrible pictures