|>>|| No. 5270
Does anyone know the norms around using a modified illustration in a report? To what lengths does one need to go to explain where it's from, and why it's modified? For example, in my case, if I were feeling meticulous the citation would read 'graph by x, borrowed from a report by y, using figures from z, then modified my me using figures from z, but found in incomplete form in a report by aa, which explains the difference in presentation'. Is all that really necessary?
<== It's not that one, by the way. I'm still working on it.