[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
learning

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 5279)
Message
File  []
close
image.jpg
527952795279
>> No. 5279 Anonymous
1st May 2014
Thursday 7:41 pm
5279 spacer
I apologise profusely for having to ask this, but I'm in dire need of some help with a project I'm doing.

My graded unit is due in 2 weeks and I'm 90% done. The thing is, I'm not really sure I actually know what I'm talking about in the analysis of the data.

I am having to explain relative risk and confidence intervals in this report in a way 1st year uni students would understand (my target audience), but I'm not sure I understand them entirely myself.

I get relative risk, but confidence interval is pickling my mind and even when I google it I seem to glaze over. As far as I can tell, it is some sort of standard deviation that relates to how reliable a number, i.e. A relative risk value, is to a given percentage.

Is that right? Thanks in advance, lads. The report is about diseases during pregnancy, particularly causes of pre-natal uterine bleeding, and whether smoking increases the risk of these conditions.
Expand all images.
>> No. 5280 Anonymous
1st May 2014
Thursday 7:43 pm
5280 spacer
>pre-natal uterine bleeding

Ew.
>> No. 5281 Anonymous
1st May 2014
Thursday 7:54 pm
5281 spacer
>>5280

I have delved deep down the rabbit hole of pre-natal complications from placental abruptions to still born births during this project. Medical science is not at all glamourous.
>> No. 5282 Anonymous
1st May 2014
Thursday 10:39 pm
5282 spacer
>>5281
>placental abruption
Sounds hot.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password