One of them, unfortunately.

>>6065
>tertiary education establishment

(A good day to you Sir!)

>>6067
Guess he means like the 3rd stage of education? Even though it's the 4th...

>>6068
School, sixth form, uni? Seems like a sensible division, sure you could subdivide school but given the regional differences between infants/juniors/seniors/primary/secondary/high school etc etc. it would be a bit of a ballache.

>>6069

I think most people in the UK think of primary and secondary school as being separate, as far as I know there are no schools which provide both types of education and neither are there any schools which provide only infant or junior education (I'm happy to be told I'm wrong, though).

>>6070
You get a 'hill form' in some schools (a year 6 class only). Pretty rare though.

>>6070

A substantial proportion of independent schools teach reception through to year 11 or sixth form. I believe some Montessori schools only teach preschool and infant classes.

>>6070
>neither are there any schools which provide only infant or junior education

Well this part is false - I went to completely separate infant and junior schools.

Now that I think about it, it's probably because before sixth form colleges were a thing people mostly did their A-level studies at their secondary school (and this is still common at many schools, independent schools in particular). So if you subsume A-levels into secondary school, and combine infants/juniors as primary education that gives primary, secondary and then tertiary for university.

A-levels are considered high/secondary school. I thought this was common knowledge.

Now that my ban is over, let me clarify:

Primary,
Secondary,
Tertiary i.e. University.

As some anon pointed out, this is most likely because most schools of moderate size had a combined sixth form department.

Also I was drunk when I posted this thread, and I didn't realise it was on the wrong board, soz.

>>6075
It isn't on the wrong board, it's just a shit thread. Also, we already have a similar shit thread: >>4291­.

>>6078
What a strange coincedence that the OP's image would again be a Nazi.