[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ Last 50 posts ]
>> | No. 20925
20925
I'm really looking forward to it, despite a couple of autistic bloggers crying about it. Not sure why such an over emotional reaction to a film is happening. |
>> | No. 20926
20926
>Really impressed with the way it's being marketed as well. |
>> | No. 20927
20927
>>20925 |
>> | No. 20928
20928
>>20927 |
>> | No. 20929
20929
Looking pretty good from the reviews on rotten tomatoes, as well |
>> | No. 20930
20930
I'm sure it's actually quite a fun blockbuster, but the clips on the adverts of the handsome but stupid Secretary bloke just make me imagine what would have happened if it was male ghostbusters with a ditzy blonde. Maybe that's the point, or I'm a disgusting offensive man apologist, I don't know. |
>> | No. 20931
20931
>>20930 |
>> | No. 20932
20932
>>20927 |
>> | No. 20933
20933
>>20930 |
>> | No. 20934
20934
>>20933 |
>> | No. 20935
20935
>>20933 |
>> | No. 20936
20936
Its fun/scary not giving a fuck about ghostbusters so I can watch this unfold from the sidelines. >>20929 gives a good link to see what is going on when you compare some of the 'top critics' and how reviews seem to be decided by who they are writing for. |
>> | No. 20937
20937
>>20936 |
>> | No. 20938
20938
I'm of the firm belief any misogynistic campaigning against this film/controversy is purely the creation of the films PR team. |
>> | No. 20939
20939
>>20933 |
>> | No. 20940
20940
>>20936 |
>> | No. 20941
20941
>>20939 |
>> | No. 20942
20942
>>20941 |
>> | No. 20943
20943
>>20942 |
>> | No. 20944
20944
>>20943 This. Portraying women positively is brilliant. If you're portraying women positively whilst deliberately portraying men in a shitty manner, then you're not solving anything - you are part of the problem, you are perpetuating the very issues you claim to be trying to eliminate. |
>> | No. 20945
20945
>>20944 |
>> | No. 20946
20946
>>20945 |
>> | No. 20947
20947
>>20946 |
>> | No. 20948
20948
>>20941 |
>> | No. 20949
20949
>>20948 |
>> | No. 20950
20950
>>20937 |
>> | No. 20951
20951
I saw it last night. It's not good. The vast majority of comedies aren't so that's no real shocker. But it certainly is nowhere near as good as the original (which I wasn't even that fond of) and none of the performances held a candle to the original cast. |
>> | No. 20952
20952
>>20934 |
>> | No. 20953
20953
>>20940 |
>> | No. 20954
20954
I'm really impressed with the marketing to, such an unexpected saturation, train stations, publicly funded news providers, obscure image boards. |
>> | No. 20955
20955
>>20953 |
>> | No. 20956
20956
>>20955 |
>> | No. 20957
20957
>>20956 |
>> | No. 20958
20958
>>20955 |
>> | No. 20959
20959
>>20958 |
>> | No. 20960
20960
It is pretty fucking bad, but not in a laughable way. It's just very shit. It's one of those films where you keep glancing at your watch a lot, it feels very, very long. |
>> | No. 20961
20961
>>20955 |
>> | No. 20962
20962
>>20961 |
>> | No. 20963
20963
>>20962 |
>> | No. 20964
20964
>>20961 |
>> | No. 20965
20965
>>20962 |
>> | No. 20966
20966
>>20965 |
>> | No. 20967
20967
>>20965 |
>> | No. 20968
20968
>>20966 |
>> | No. 20969
20969
>>20966 |
>> | No. 20970
20970
>>20969 |
>> | No. 20971
20971
>>20970 |
>> | No. 20972
20972
>>20970 |
>> | No. 20973
20973
>>20972 |
>> | No. 20974
20974
>>20973 |
>> | No. 20975
20975
Just so this thread does actually have something funny in it, here's something made a few years ago by a great bunch of lads to go out on the lash with. |
>> | No. 20977
20977
Simple Simon doesn't like the film either. |
>> | No. 20979
20979
|
>> | No. 20980
20980
>>20979 |
>> | No. 20981
20981
>>20980 |
>> | No. 20982
20982
>>20980 |
>> | No. 20983
20983
>>20980 |
>> | No. 20996
20996
>>20983 |
>> | No. 20997
20997
>>20996 |
>> | No. 21000
21000
>>20996 |
>> | No. 21001
21001
I'm tempted to go see it just to spite the bellends. |
>> | No. 21003
21003
>>21001 Do it, it's actually a pretty fun movie if you don't go with any preconceptions or baggage, or are a raging impotent misogynist. The Kate McKinnon character's a real show stealer, and the effects are pretty awesome. |
>> | No. 21004
21004
>>21001 |
>> | No. 21005
21005
So you can't dislike films with female leads or you're a misogynist? |
>> | No. 21006
21006
>>21005 |
>> | No. 21007
21007
>>21005 |
>> | No. 21008
21008
>>21005 No-one said that, teenladm8. What you got there is a propositional fallacy. |
>> | No. 21011
21011
>>21007 |
>> | No. 21012
21012
>>21001 |
>> | No. 21013
21013
>>21011 |
>> | No. 21037
21037
obi wan.jpg I felt a great disturbance in the thread, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in a cunt off and were suddenly silenced. |
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ Last 50 posts ]
Delete Post [] Password |