[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
film/video

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 23449)
Message
File  []
close
Screenshot 2020-12-16 225804.jpg
234492344923449
>> No. 23449 Anonymous
16th December 2020
Wednesday 11:00 pm
23449 What are you watching right now?
I suppose we need a /v/ equivalent of the /e/ and /beat/ threads.

I've started watching Life on Mars again, but this time in HD on Netflix, and have only just realised it was filmed on... film. That or transferred to film and re-digitised for Netflix. The version Netflix has is absolutely covered in dust marks.
Expand all images.
>> No. 23450 Anonymous
16th December 2020
Wednesday 11:23 pm
23450 spacer
No, we don't, telly's shit. If a TV show is worth talking about a thread should be made. It's not a one off thing like a song or a game you tried.
>> No. 23451 Anonymous
16th December 2020
Wednesday 11:28 pm
23451 spacer
>>23449
Oh I'm watching that too, so I can then progress to Ashes. I've already read the ending for Ashes on Wikipedia, it's fucking nuts.

Tyler can be a moralising arse at times. He got especially preachy about Hillsborough at the end of that football episode.

>>23450
Bore off.
>> No. 23452 Anonymous
16th December 2020
Wednesday 11:53 pm
23452 spacer
New season of The Expanse.
>> No. 23453 Anonymous
17th December 2020
Thursday 12:00 am
23453 spacer
>>23451
Having seen the ending of Ashes To Ashes many times, I have so unbelievably many questions about it. It really does destroy the fiction of the world set up in both Life on Mars AND Ashes to Ashes. It feels to me like the writers were told at the 11th hour that this was their last series and that they had to wrap things up NOW.
>> No. 23454 Anonymous
17th December 2020
Thursday 12:04 am
23454 spacer
Expanse is back on. Going by the first episode it's a bit shit this season but I'm curious how they're going to get rid of the Martian Texan given the actor has gotten himself unpersoned.

Other than that I watched the Real Adam Smith documentary series recently. I should read his books at some point.
>> No. 23455 Anonymous
17th December 2020
Thursday 1:02 am
23455 spacer
I re-watched Auf Wiedersehen Pet recently. It has held up quite well, which isn't terribly surprising given that it was written by Clement and La Frenais.

I'm not sure if it makes for comforting or disquieting viewing in 2020. It feels completely familiar yet also totally alien, like re-visiting your old primary school as an adult. The eighties were absolutely shit for a lot of people, but they also felt hopeful in a way that seems naive now.

When we talk about it being an "aspirational" decade we tend to think of yuppies in the City, but we forget about all of the working-class people who believed that they could build a better life for themselves through hard work and determination. Those hopes were largely fulfilled through the boom years of the 90s and early 00s, but that kind of hope seems almost childlike today.

Even before COVID, there was a general sense that upward mobility is dead and the best you can manage is to grimly hold on to your rung on the ladder, especially for young people. Life is unarguably better today than it was in the past, but it doesn't feel like it's getting better, which makes all the difference.

Maybe I'm just being sentimental.


>> No. 23456 Anonymous
17th December 2020
Thursday 4:05 am
23456 spacer
>>23455
I like your analysis very much.
>> No. 23457 Anonymous
17th December 2020
Thursday 4:31 am
23457 spacer
>>23454

I'm not fully caught up on the TV version so they might lean on him more, but at least for the books, I think Alex is, serendipitously, the only crewmember you could really replace in the story without taking huge sidesteps around story beats - his only real plot points are that he's really attached to/good at flying the roci, is divorced with a kid and becomes really good friends and resistance co-conspirator with Bobbie - they can easily wave him away as moving back to Mars or MIA and find a new hotshot pilot to easily replace him. You could even shoehorn Filip in there, rather than him just never being mentioned again after being almost the entire point of one whole book, though that might be a bit too complicated.

I'd also not really give a shit if they just shoved some other brown bloke with an accent in there and pretended nothing happened.

You should definitely read the books, they're just as good as the show, if not better, as they get the sense of scale of the whole thing a bit better in text. I also highly recommend going the audiobook route if you're into that, the bloke that reads them is fantastic.
>> No. 23458 Anonymous
17th December 2020
Thursday 4:43 am
23458 spacer
>>23457

Also forgot about Peaches who is/was an accomplished pinnace pilot. Alex is really fucking replaceable, and further supports my real life view that pilots are boring bus drivers.
>> No. 23459 Anonymous
17th December 2020
Thursday 12:16 pm
23459 spacer
>>23455

It's a great show. I watched it when I was younger after I heard it was really funny, and thinking it would be a sitcom like Only Fools and Horses or the like, I found it disappointing.

Watching it as an adult though, it really is great.

I like your analysis, and whilst I can't fully relate as I'm 29 so I wasn't around in the 80s, this show along with others does give off that sense of optimism. Barry's story sums it up the most; grafting away abroad for a bit, being sensible and sending money home each week, to then return, start your own business and buy a fairly large house all by yourself. Seems magical, or maybe I'm a lazy twat who knows.
>> No. 23460 Anonymous
17th December 2020
Thursday 1:15 pm
23460 spacer
I'm watching shitloads of South Park at the minute. I need a bit of background noise when I'm working but it has to be something I've seen so many times that I don't have to pay attention to it. Before this I worked my way through Futurama and Malcolm in the Middle, interspersed with films like The Mummy and Big Trouble in Little China for the same reason.
>> No. 23461 Anonymous
17th December 2020
Thursday 8:18 pm
23461 spacer
>>23449
The ending was so disappointing
>> No. 23462 Anonymous
17th December 2020
Thursday 10:01 pm
23462 spacer
>>23460
Can you tell me where the hell I can stream Malcolm in the Middle?
>> No. 23463 Anonymous
17th December 2020
Thursday 10:08 pm
23463 spacer
>>23462
All 4.

https://www.channel4.com/programmes/malcolm-in-the-middle
>> No. 23464 Anonymous
17th December 2020
Thursday 11:36 pm
23464 spacer
>>23453
>>23449
Ladchaps, theres a new series set in that universe on the way.
Will be set across the timelines and involve everyone.

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2020/apr/03/life-on-mars-creator-third-final-series-in-works-bbc
>> No. 23465 Anonymous
18th December 2020
Friday 12:25 am
23465 spacer
>>23464
No I feel like I'm a timewarp. Or a flipping coma.
>> No. 23466 Anonymous
18th December 2020
Friday 12:39 am
23466 spacer
>>23464
It'll be interesting if they even try and resolve the stories of the characters, and of course they are all 10-15 years older now, so I wonder how they'll get around that.

That and the "mostly in an alternate present" -- they'll have to do some interesting writing if they want Simm and Hawes in that - they are both dead and in 'heaven' according to the ending of Ashes to Ashes.
>> No. 23467 Anonymous
18th December 2020
Friday 2:38 pm
23467 spacer
>>23460

South Park is still a really fun watch, even the newer ones (although the format has changed quite a bit and it does suffer from being too topical). There is a really comfy charm to the older episodes though. One of my sort of autistic Winter traditions is to get warm and comfortable and boot up a PS1 emulator and have the first three seasons on in the background as I get good and drunk.

The earlier eps are surprisingly tame looking at them now.
>> No. 23469 Anonymous
21st December 2020
Monday 1:45 am
23469 spacer
Christ I've got fuck all to do.

Just finished Ashes to Ashes, and whilst I could ask dozens of questions about the ending, one thing I missed the first time I watched through was the fact they tried for a Miami Vice moment by using In The Air Tonight over a melancholy scene not once but twice, and it doesn't really work either time.
>> No. 23470 Anonymous
21st December 2020
Monday 2:17 am
23470 spacer
>>23451

He has a point this shitey bollocks general threads is the lead in our water supply.
>> No. 23471 Anonymous
21st December 2020
Monday 11:54 pm
23471 spacer
>>23463
No good I'm afraid, I'm watching it with a non-native speaker and need subtitles, and Channel 4's are notoriously pisspoor.
>> No. 23472 Anonymous
22nd December 2020
Tuesday 1:29 am
23472 spacer
>>23464

Well that's bound to be shit, innit.
>> No. 23473 Anonymous
25th December 2020
Friday 4:33 pm
23473 spacer

tumblr_lqxh7iK9mM1qeolyto1_500.jpg
234732347323473
I've been binging Parks and Recreation lately. Light-hearted sitcoms have been keeping me going this year and I'm a bureaucrat by profession so it's fun.

Before that it was That 70s Show but I got annoyed when they continued the show after graduation and had to make all kind of dumbass reasons to keep the plot going. If there's one thing Americans can't do it's know when to stop.
>> No. 23474 Anonymous
26th December 2020
Saturday 6:01 am
23474 spacer
I've been watching videos on YouTube of people melting metal stuff down. Particularly BigstackD in Australia.


>> No. 23475 Anonymous
28th December 2020
Monday 3:04 pm
23475 spacer

Inside-Number-9.jpg
234752347523475
So I barely even noticed a fifth series of pic related came out earlier this year, but I do seem to remember someone on here saying it was rubbish, which I really don't agree with. I think episode five was pretty rough going, but besides that and a single gag in episode two I enjoyed the whole thing. The whole show's all on iPlayer still if you're interested.

I'd have sworn blind there was already a Inside No. 9 thread on here, but I was clearly mistaken and my tiny review of the series five doesn't warrant one on it's own.
>> No. 23476 Anonymous
28th December 2020
Monday 3:46 pm
23476 spacer
>>23475
Apart from the Misdirection episode I thought series five was a bit flat and below par. My favourite is probably Zanzibar.
>> No. 23477 Anonymous
15th January 2021
Friday 7:05 pm
23477 spacer
Okay the first couple episodes of WandaVision were fun. Shame they couldn't just stick around for awhile longer in 1950s TVland as it's a fun setting and I hate Marvel capeshit.
>> No. 23478 Anonymous
15th January 2021
Friday 7:30 pm
23478 spacer
>>23477
>1950s TVland

I have been rewatching the Twilight Zone. Every time I do it's just so jarring to see people chugging on cigs like chimneys and depictions of drinking and driving like nothing's wrong.
>> No. 23479 Anonymous
15th January 2021
Friday 8:02 pm
23479 spacer
>>23478
It really is a tragically underused setting and I'd happily watch something that's self-aware with an underlying sinister tone. All the doctors being heavy smokers and separate beds for married couples are things that were deadly serious back then but hilarious now.

I'd like a VR game where you play as a 1950s tv family trying to climb to the top of the social totem pole (much of the charm of the original Sims I guess) without getting caught out and lot's of sidequests about savings cats from trees and other forms of non-danger. If you don't play along though the studio lights turn off, the music cuts and
all the townspeople come and rip you to shreds which turns it into a 'how long can I survive' horror with exploration elements.
>> No. 23480 Anonymous
15th January 2021
Friday 8:24 pm
23480 spacer
>>23478
> I have been rewatching the Twilight Zone. Every time I do it's just so jarring to see people chugging on cigs like chimneys and depictions of drinking and driving like nothing's wrong.

I've been having a similar reaction when watching anything made pre-pandemic. Something in my head goes "no, that's wrong!" whenever someone shares a drink with someone or touches their mouth after picking something up off the floor and not washing their hands in between. We humans are a weird lot.
>> No. 23481 Anonymous
15th January 2021
Friday 8:27 pm
23481 spacer
Also some bastard decided to release the new episodes of Disenchantment on Netflix at around 4am instead of 9am so I almost ended up in a very bad situation. Luckily I was able to turn the telly off after just the first episode otherwise I wouldn't have got any kip at all.
>> No. 23482 Anonymous
15th January 2021
Friday 8:28 pm
23482 spacer
>>23479

Could it also have a psychobilly influenced soundtrack and be called "And None Of Them Knew They Were Robots"?
>> No. 23483 Anonymous
15th January 2021
Friday 8:50 pm
23483 spacer
>>23479
There's a brief element of that in the intro to Saints Row IV, and I guess with a less American twinge, We Happy Few.

I would also wager that playing a VR game in B&W would also get very tiring very quickly.

>>23482
Now I Googled that and all I got was a short-lived thrash band from Leeds. Is it a quote from something or are you just trying to drum up attention to your old band?
>> No. 23484 Anonymous
15th January 2021
Friday 8:57 pm
23484 spacer
>>23483

No, it was unrelated, I think it might be a song by some other band but it's just a phrase I somehow have stuck in my head knocking around. It's tied to images of like, 1950s housewives from those Trueman Show style adverts, only their eyes go red because they're robots. But they don't know they're robots.

As for psychobilly, it's just because my missus put The Meteors on the other day and I realised it's a genre of music I have a very strong stereotype idea of, mentally, when I think of 50s/60s Americana. But I can't think of any examples of contemporary 1950s music that actually sounds anything like it. I like stuff like that in period settings, kind of anachronistic but fitting.

We Brits are always slightly dour about it when people make un-subtle reductive pastiches of our culture (like We Happy Few) but I'd happily play the 50s American suburbia equivalent of that.
>> No. 23485 Anonymous
15th January 2021
Friday 9:38 pm
23485 spacer
>>23477

Who's playing the blonde housewife in E2? She's the spitting image of Madeline Kahn.
I just realised she's Anya from Buffy. She really has the mannerisms of Madeline Kahn here, it's bizarre.
>> No. 23486 Anonymous
15th January 2021
Friday 9:57 pm
23486 spacer
>>23482
My mental image was all the subtle light and lounge that the 1950s had multiple genres of - exactly like the Sims loading screens.

>>23483
I was thinking back to Fallout 3 where you go into a simulation of the 1950s in a child's body. It's touched upon everywhere but you rarely see anyone go all out on it like Pleasantville did.

>I would also wager that playing a VR game in B&W would also get very tiring very quickly.

Would be funny to see the reaction as people start dreaming and thinking in monochrome though.
>> No. 23487 Anonymous
15th January 2021
Friday 10:09 pm
23487 spacer
>>23486
Funny you should say that - I played Tranquility Lane in VR when I played Fallout 3 using VorpX. I had to change it to colour because there's also a massive bloom effect with the tranquility lane 'weather' in Fallout 3; it's like your retinas are being stabbed with a poker.

Don't get me started on Vault 112 and what a massive missed opportunity it was. Hell, it could be a game all of itself.
>> No. 23488 Anonymous
15th January 2021
Friday 10:12 pm
23488 spacer
Oh, there's also a 50s american TV pastiche in VR that I can't remember the name of, but it's an on-rails (literally) shooter because your hands are guns and in this world everyone's hands are guns. UpIsNotJump did a review on it.
>> No. 23489 Anonymous
15th January 2021
Friday 10:37 pm
23489 spacer
>>23481
Clearly either the producer or Groening fucking loves mid-2000s British comedy, since we've got all the voices now. Matt Berry, Noel Fielding, and now Richard Ayoade. I'm just waiting for Mitchell and Webb and Simon Pegg.
>> No. 23490 Anonymous
15th January 2021
Friday 11:15 pm
23490 spacer
>>23489

It's weird but other than Matt Berry I don't immediately recognise the others' voices despite being very much familiar with their bodies of work.
>> No. 23491 Anonymous
15th January 2021
Friday 11:17 pm
23491 spacer
>>23490

Maybe pay less attention to their bodies of work and more to their voices of work? Pervert.
>> No. 23492 Anonymous
15th January 2021
Friday 11:18 pm
23492 spacer
>>23491

How dare you kink-shame me in this way.
>> No. 23493 Anonymous
16th January 2021
Saturday 12:26 am
23493 spacer
Just watched this episode. I know attitudes were different back in the early 1960s but.... Christ.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fugitive_(The_Twilight_Zone)
>> No. 23494 Anonymous
16th January 2021
Saturday 12:27 am
23494 spacer
>>23493
The link includes the closing bracket. Thanks brian.
>> No. 23495 Anonymous
16th January 2021
Saturday 10:06 am
23495 spacer
>>23493
Well he's not really an old nonce, he's a dashing young king from another planet, you bigot!.
>> No. 23496 Anonymous
16th January 2021
Saturday 10:49 am
23496 spacer
>>23493
I didn't read any noncery there. Did you think Amidala was a nonce when she meets a boy Anakin Skywalker and ends up shagging him as an adult?
>> No. 23497 Anonymous
16th January 2021
Saturday 12:20 pm
23497 spacer
>>23496
Well I'm just guessing what otherlad was talking about. Maybe there was just lots of smoking.
>> No. 23498 Anonymous
16th January 2021
Saturday 1:43 pm
23498 spacer
>>23496
I've never seen a star war so I don't know.

There's a line at the beginning, though:
>"If you're so magic, why can't you fix my leg?"
"Then you'd be able to get a young boyfriend"

Also, the "handsome man" he's revealed to be is still about 30.
>> No. 23499 Anonymous
16th January 2021
Saturday 6:00 pm
23499 spacer
>>23496

Amidala was meant to be young teens too in the first one wasn't she?

Mind you I suppose it's tradition after the twincest in the originals.
>> No. 23500 Anonymous
16th January 2021
Saturday 6:15 pm
23500 spacer
>>23496
Amidala didn't kidnap Anakin and spend a decade grooming him to become the king of Naboo, in fairness. Indeed from what I recall the two basically seemed incompatible in every way and she was simply the first woman Anakin had seen who wasn't his mum. Why do you think C3PO was so heavily queer coded? Because that robot was literally coded queer. Think about it.
>> No. 23501 Anonymous
16th January 2021
Saturday 6:43 pm
23501 spacer
>>23500
I'm intrigued by your theory of the prequal trilogy being the story of Anakin's repressed homosexuality and his lashing out at the world. The dots all join up so well from the monastic anti-sexual repression of the Jedi to Palpatine being a bit of a noncey old man.

As for the Twilight Zone episode I just put it down to being a bad episode. There's different attitudes of the time at work but you can also see reflections of classic fairytale themes involving Prince Charming rescuing the Cinderella - and which young girls probably like (not that I would know of course). It might've been a stronger story if the original draft was in a half-hour format as I suspect what we have is two half-formed ideas stuck together.
>> No. 23502 Anonymous
17th January 2021
Sunday 1:49 pm
23502 spacer
>>23500
>kidnap
>spend a decade grooming him
Neither of which is implied in the plot summary, if you read the same one I did. Maybe you just wish there was noncery in it because that's what they were all like back then. Only a matter of time before fuckin' Rod Serling is exposed as worse than Jim'll eh.
>> No. 23572 Anonymous
8th February 2021
Monday 6:10 pm
23572 spacer
Watching the Amazon show The Man In The High Castle, which has little to do with the original book other than setting and character names (although they don't match their book counterparts).

The most interesting thing is it was clearly edited as in Internet TV Show. Each episode is a) designed to be watched quite closely together -- there are no re-establishing shots, you get about 10 seconds of the last episode usually before it continues completely dry; and b) the intro sequence is the best part of 90 seconds long, which seems to be like it was intended to be skipped.

The intro sequence does need an award for slowest human performance of a song, though. Christ it drags. Also it's the Dad's Army intro, complete with triangle-headed lines moving across a map.
>> No. 23798 Anonymous
23rd June 2021
Wednesday 8:14 pm
23798 spacer
Simpsons quiz show with Nick Frost and some other 90's channel 4 people. It's quite good.


>> No. 23799 Anonymous
23rd June 2021
Wednesday 8:19 pm
23799 spacer
>>23798

Fuck me, how depressing.
>> No. 23800 Anonymous
23rd June 2021
Wednesday 8:22 pm
23800 spacer
>>23798

Something about seeing adverts I remember from my youth distinctly gives me the fear.
>> No. 23801 Anonymous
23rd June 2021
Wednesday 9:05 pm
23801 spacer
>>23798
My favourite part of these uploads is that they leave the adverts in so you can look at life in 2004 and how different things are. I don't remember all the advertising HMV did on albums - I bet we would've had a /101/.
>> No. 23802 Anonymous
23rd June 2021
Wednesday 9:12 pm
23802 spacer
>>23801

There are whole compilations of old ads on YouTube. I once spent a whole night with my missus going back in time a year at a time to see how far back we remember the adverts.

I think TV ads are a fascinating cultural snapshot, being on the pulse of what people are into at any given moment is what makes the most effective marketing, so they make for a pretty accurate reflection of society at the time. Just look at those ones, digital cameras were still a thing!

Of course due to not owning a TV, I haven't seen an advert since I moved out of my mum and dad's, meaning I have absolutely no idea what the last decade of TV advertising has been like.
>> No. 23803 Anonymous
23rd June 2021
Wednesday 10:27 pm
23803 spacer
>>23801
>I don't remember all the advertising HMV did on albums

Those Zutons songs weren't half as annoying as I remembered them to be.
>> No. 23804 Anonymous
23rd June 2021
Wednesday 10:42 pm
23804 spacer
>>23802
The best bit for me is seeing the old prices. Sure you could buy a house back then but white goods took the absolute piss.
>> No. 23805 Anonymous
24th June 2021
Thursday 12:12 am
23805 spacer

received_332335214068998.jpg
238052380523805
>>23804
That reminds me, one of the buildings at my uni could only really be described as a "shit time machine" -- miles of corridors lined with unused lockers. Often I'd go to the nigh-abandoned upper floors and open random lockers. I found this offers pamphlet for a supermarket from 1977.

At inflation, it works out about a 7x multiplier ok the prices. Could you imagine a chocolate orange costing nearly £4? The cheapest bottle of shit wine being almost £8? The other pages were like that too, I'll post if people are interested. It's mad to think how much mass manufacturing has brought the prices of things down in relative terms.
>> No. 23806 Anonymous
24th June 2021
Thursday 12:23 am
23806 spacer
>>23805

That's chocolate orange(s), plural. The weights of the other stuff seems pretty bulky for the price too, seing as most of it is a quid for a full pound of chocolate. I don't know how much pounds are in weight because I was born in colour, but they don't seem all that bad.

If current economic trends continue I think we're all going to have to get used to paying more for our shit anyway, because everyone is due ten years of backdated payrise and the EU slaves flexible workforce have fucked off.
>> No. 23807 Anonymous
24th June 2021
Thursday 12:37 am
23807 spacer
>>23806

A pound is 453 grams.

£26 for a bottle of Gordons is wild, it's no wonder we're all binge drinking maniacs these days.
>> No. 23808 Anonymous
24th June 2021
Thursday 12:56 am
23808 spacer
>>23806
>>23807
It being an old-fashioned style shop, do you reckon you could walk in and say "pound and half of chocolate orange, ta", and they'd measure it out for you, breaking one in half to satisfy the request if need be?
>> No. 23809 Anonymous
24th June 2021
Thursday 12:43 pm
23809 spacer
>>23805
>Prices subject to government change

Sign of the times right there.
>> No. 23810 Anonymous
24th June 2021
Thursday 3:14 pm
23810 spacer

Screenshot 2021-06-24 150923.jpg
238102381023810
Here's the rest of it.
Seems things were sold in bigger boxes back in't day.

A kilo of frozen green beans for £3.50 though? Ouch. I've just bought the same for £1. A ham joint is about £2.50/lb these days, and gammon the same.
>> No. 23817 Anonymous
29th June 2021
Tuesday 6:25 pm
23817 spacer
>>23488
The American Dream
>> No. 23818 Anonymous
29th June 2021
Tuesday 7:52 pm
23818 spacer
>>23805 Scotsmac?
That's something I'd never seen. A quick search suggests I've been lucky. Sounds like a fine drink.
https://www.goodfoodrevolution.com/scotsmac-aka-bams-dram/
>> No. 23819 Anonymous
29th June 2021
Tuesday 11:55 pm
23819 spacer

TopDeck.jpg
238192381923819
>>23810
Top Deck Lemonade & Lager or Lager Shandy at eleven and a half pence per can, definitely brings back memories. Thought I was a proper hard lad at 10 years old (buying and) drinking it. Not that hard to wonder where my functional alcoholism started.
>> No. 23820 Anonymous
30th June 2021
Wednesday 2:39 pm
23820 spacer
>>23810

The seam in the middle of this image is upsetting me immensely. I tried to fix it in photoshop, but there is a slight torque in it, so the seam isn't running exactly on the square. There also appears to be a couple of mm missing which is most apparent on the middle Santa.

Why did you do this to me lad?
>> No. 23821 Anonymous
30th June 2021
Wednesday 3:08 pm
23821 spacer
>>23820
Oh, it's only the beginning. I've got a few more sneaky surprises for you.
>> No. 23822 Anonymous
30th June 2021
Wednesday 8:17 pm
23822 spacer
>>23821
Oh you cunt.
>> No. 23823 Anonymous
30th June 2021
Wednesday 9:19 pm
23823 spacer
>>23820
>>23822

I'm not >>23821, but unfortunately I made that image many a year ago and don't know if I still have the originals. Will have a look later.
>> No. 23824 Anonymous
4th July 2021
Sunday 2:00 pm
23824 spacer

tomorrow_war_xlg.jpg
238242382423824
Just watched The Tomorrow War, it's fun in a dumb blockbuster sense. You really have to turn your brain off through right from the start with its shots of Theresa May and Gordon Brown plus the infuriating military tactics but the aliens and combat gives it a nice 90s videogame style.

Though I'm not being funny but, fuck me this film has a lot of black people in it. Not in some racialist sense like there's just a wise-cracking black sidekick but almost every character in this movie is played by a black person outside of the protagonist and his family. There's an impossible amount of black people in this movie, no Asians or anything else even in the background, it's like they set an AI to run the diversity at Amazon and it's gone off the rails.
>> No. 23825 Anonymous
4th July 2021
Sunday 2:54 pm
23825 spacer
Hang on, we need a conclave to decide something NotARacistButLad just blundered into: is this thread for TV shows only or films as well? I had assumed the former and as of this moment I've never been wrong about anything ever.
>> No. 23826 Anonymous
4th July 2021
Sunday 3:30 pm
23826 spacer
>>23825
If we had a separate movie and tv show thread then it will just get confusing for the hidden gems thread.
>> No. 23827 Anonymous
4th July 2021
Sunday 5:30 pm
23827 spacer
>>23826
Be that as it may, if you'd read my post to its end you'd see I've never been wrong, so it seems we're at an impasse.
>> No. 23828 Anonymous
4th July 2021
Sunday 6:15 pm
23828 spacer
>>23824

It's pretty easy to forget that "black people" are only about 15% of the united states population.

I'm just waiting for the diversified Silmarillion series they're doing. What might be cool would be if they used the space granted by the sparse writing about Harad to explore the meetings of different cultures, considering it'll be about as canon to the setting as my arse they might as well make the most of it, but they'll probably turn half the numenoreans brown or something. Groan.
>> No. 23829 Anonymous
4th July 2021
Sunday 7:57 pm
23829 spacer
>>23824
>>23828
Maybe the aliens hit the majority-white areas first.
>> No. 23830 Anonymous
4th July 2021
Sunday 10:06 pm
23830 spacer

war1200.jpg
238302383023830
>>23828
I remember a small controversy a few months back where it was pointed out the LOTR casting had yet to show any East Asians. I hope it's just mistaken given, yeah, Harad would obviously be a bit of a crossroad with near and far being middle eastern to black by the respective description but would obviously also be more like the Eurasian steppe in my mind.

>>23829
It actually shows today and the future where the entire old world is gone. It would've been an interesting touch if they showed a subtly more "Latino" future rather the future being a carbon copy of the past but it's not the kind of movie to have detail.

Seriously, someone watch the movie and back me up on this, casting completely forgot what diversity means. Part of me suspects it was a deliberate decision because it was done to capitalise on the climate of last year and now looks outdated as Asians representation has become more vocal.
>> No. 23831 Anonymous
5th July 2021
Monday 9:51 pm
23831 spacer
>>23829

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWO1pkHgrBM
>> No. 23832 Anonymous
6th July 2021
Tuesday 12:34 am
23832 spacer
>>23828

I know it's not really the same but the Witcher Netflix adaptation chucked in a few black people who clearly wouldn't have been black in a fictionalised fantasy eastern europe based world, but it felt fine and worked fine. I think if you're not actively looking to complain about it, a black elf isn't really as odd as, well, an elf in the first place.
>> No. 23892 Anonymous
4th August 2021
Wednesday 7:58 pm
23892 spacer

Crash_original_film_art_spo_2000x.jpg
238922389223892
Wait fuck this isn't the 1996 adaptation of the novel this is some American race bullshit. Thandiwe Newton hasn't aged a day in the past twenty years.
>> No. 23893 Anonymous
5th August 2021
Thursday 11:12 pm
23893 spacer

MV5BMzE1NWY2NGYtNzA5Yi00MGFmLThkYzAtNWY2Y2Q1MjQ4Mz.jpg
238932389323893
I found a French sci-fi series called Missions on iPlayer. All the episodes are on there with the plot heavily inspired by sci-fi like 2001 about a mission to Mars. It's pretty good so far despite being on a shoe-string budget.
>> No. 23894 Anonymous
6th August 2021
Friday 8:59 am
23894 spacer
>>23892
"You want me to pin a medal on a guy named Saddam! Give yourself a raise!"
>> No. 23895 Anonymous
6th August 2021
Friday 9:39 am
23895 spacer
>>23894
I liked that bit of characterisation as it was him who wanted to pin the medal, the other guy was talking him out of it. Well written and well played piece of characterisation.
>> No. 23896 Anonymous
6th August 2021
Friday 1:59 pm
23896 spacer

This show appears to be an Aussie version of The Thick of It. It's definitely better than the American version.
>> No. 23897 Anonymous
6th August 2021
Friday 2:10 pm
23897 spacer
>>23896
There's a follow-up series to that.

>> No. 23898 Anonymous
6th August 2021
Friday 2:20 pm
23898 spacer


I watched the latest Clarkson/Grand Tour series; during the last episode they used this, reminding me how great it is, and now I have it on repeat all day.
>> No. 23899 Anonymous
6th August 2021
Friday 5:35 pm
23899 spacer
>>23898
It's the sort of tune that makes you want to pick up a guitar and sing.
>> No. 23950 Anonymous
22nd August 2021
Sunday 3:34 pm
23950 spacer
>>23899
Makes me want to drive through Las Venturas while listening to K-DST.

People like Jack Thompson decried the violence of the GTA games but they really should've been praising them for cultivating great musical taste in the kids that played them.
>> No. 23951 Anonymous
22nd August 2021
Sunday 6:42 pm
23951 spacer
>>23950

Yeah if there's one thing the GTA games have always had, it's been an outstanding soundtrack. VC and SA were full of classic hits, but it really impressed me how IV and V had some impressive deep cuts you'd never expect to hear in a videogame.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIBa5vcDO6o

My jaw dropped when this came on driving around Liberty City the first time.
>> No. 23952 Anonymous
22nd August 2021
Sunday 8:31 pm
23952 spacer
>>23951
Everyone forgets Chris Conner's original music for the first GTA, which was also exceptional.
>> No. 23953 Anonymous
22nd August 2021
Sunday 8:46 pm
23953 spacer
>>23952
I can't forget the GTA 1 soundtrack, I used to listen to the CD with it all on including the police radio which, as far as I can tell, is just the full-length recording of police radio that every TV show made since uses clips from in any police scne.

It's on par with that one very specific hinge-creaking sound that every TV show also uses whenever someone opens a door.

5 George K
5 George K
>> No. 23954 Anonymous
22nd August 2021
Sunday 8:47 pm
23954 spacer
>>23952
Craig Conner.
>> No. 24011 Anonymous
9th October 2021
Saturday 11:57 pm
24011 spacer

Screenshot 2021-10-09 235737.png
240112401124011
Been watching the Sopranos.

One editing thing that REALLY stands out to me is the audio mix - they leave in Tony's laboured, heavy, breathing; the clanking of cutlery on plates, chewing noises.

The shot-shot editing is also really... primitive? I can't really explain it but it feels like there's very little exploration or flair in it, especially for a Prestige Drama .
>> No. 24012 Anonymous
10th October 2021
Sunday 4:59 am
24012 spacer
>>24011
I like it. Especially when his breathing gets heavier, or he starts scarping plates faster as he gets more agitated.
>> No. 24013 Anonymous
10th October 2021
Sunday 10:11 am
24013 spacer
>>24011
I dunno, I really like The Sopranos and it still stands up to being watched multiple times now - the audio is definitely intentional.
>> No. 24014 Anonymous
10th October 2021
Sunday 10:21 am
24014 spacer
>>24012
>>24013

Oh yeah, I'm not saying it's an oversight; it's clearly intentional.
>> No. 24015 Anonymous
10th October 2021
Sunday 6:17 pm
24015 spacer
>>24011
Don't watch the movie they just put out.
>> No. 24016 Anonymous
10th October 2021
Sunday 7:21 pm
24016 spacer
>>24015
Fucking bygones is never bygones.
>> No. 24020 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 5:22 pm
24020 spacer

Trailer Park Boys.jpg
240202402024020
On recommendation by some guy in the street, I bought a 6 series box set of [i]Trailer Park Boys[i]. It's awful; bad acting, bad scripting and the characters are loathesome.
The only redeeming feature is it doesn't take itself seriously, but i can't tell if that's intended or simply the cast acting like it's being filmed at the back of someones garden.
The film quality noticably improves over the couse of the entire series and later there are some geuinely funny slapstick humours, but it's watered down by the empty scenes and disconnected dialog.

I have no idea how this was, apparently, so popular.
>> No. 24021 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 6:24 pm
24021 spacer
>>24020
I binged the first nine seasons a few years ago and loved it. Just easy watching, and a generally likeable cast. Reminds me a lot of It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia, degenerate dickheads doing dumb things, but it's probably a bit less intelligent. I have tried to watch the later series (I think they're animated nowadays), but I don't know if the jokes just stopped being funny.
>> No. 24022 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 6:35 pm
24022 spacer
>>24020

Probably has a lot to do with your real life experiences, either you've grown up around dickheads just like that, or you're a posho who doesn't understand what "the joke" really is.

Same reason I can't relate at all to stuff like The Office. Other people insist it's the funniest thing since farts were invented, but I've never had a boss like David Brent or colleagues like those other twats, and all I see in it is shite cringe humour.

I think the most successful sitcoms are the ones that have the most relatable everyman character, and a novel premise, that doesn't tie it to people's personal experiences. Everyone can get into Father Ted, for example.
>> No. 24023 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 7:02 pm
24023 spacer
>>24022
>I've never had a boss like David Brent or colleagues like those other twat

Plenty of us have though, and the shit cringe humour is literally the point of the show; most of the time you're laughing at Brent because of how uncomfortable he makes you.

Also, as a manager, early on in my career, I probably said or did some very Brent things. It's very well observed, but I accept that if you haven't seen those people/types in the workplace, it's all a bit mystifying.
>> No. 24024 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 7:07 pm
24024 spacer
>>24023

I mean yeah, that was my entire point. If I had have been forced to endure those people in my working life, it would be far more relatable to me.
>> No. 24025 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 7:15 pm
24025 spacer
>>24020

My flatmate at the time watched this a lot - I didn't get it at first, but it quite quickly grew on me, I can't really quantify why other than that I started to like the characters.

It was the same with Always Sunny - season 1 was pretty rough and I was taken aback that they were just sort of shouting at each other. But now it's one of my favourite yank shows.
>> No. 24026 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 7:21 pm
24026 spacer
>>24022
How do you feel about Peepshow?
>> No. 24027 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 7:49 pm
24027 spacer
>>24022
> Everyone can get into Father Ted, for example.
Hmm.
>> No. 24028 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 7:50 pm
24028 spacer
>>24026

Peep Show does a good job because the setting is mundane, but the two main characters are opposite ends of the spectrum, and it focused more on absurd and unlikely situations they'd get into than just "Oh you know what it's like working in an office, right? Haha!"

It is still very cringe humour based, so I can only really watch small doses of it, not binge on it, but I do like it.

The film Office Space is an example of one that manages to be pretty much universally relatable too I think. It's about office drudgery on the surface, but the main theme isn't specifically about offices. It's just about having a job you hate and don't want to go to, which everybody, everybody, has had experience of. In a way that film changed my life, actually. I just saw it before I'd ever got to the stage of the main character.
>> No. 24029 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 7:55 pm
24029 spacer
>>24027

You've got to have appalling taste not to like Father Ted.

[spoilers]Or be a terminally online Twitter wanker who hates it just because it's Linehan maybe, but I'm not going to count that.[/spoilers]
>> No. 24030 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 7:56 pm
24030 spacer
>>24029

>spoilers

[spoiler]Bastard.[/soiler]
>> No. 24031 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 8:00 pm
24031 spacer
>>24029
Never got into Father Ted. The performances of the actors were all good, but it just felt a bit artificial to me, whereas I could see the event of a lot of Peep Show episodes actually happening. Same thing as The IT Crowd, I felt like I was watching a sitcom rather than connecting with the events of the story on a deeper level. Also as a terminally online Twitter wank I have the notorious TERF Graham Linehan.
>> No. 24032 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 8:03 pm
24032 spacer
>>24031
Glinner, you mean Glinner. Graham's not the same man.
>> No. 24033 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 8:07 pm
24033 spacer
>>24031

I've always thought it's a bit absurd not to like something because of knowledge you have, with the benefit of hindsight, about its creator. Nobody even knew what a TERF was in the early 90s when that show first aired, and I'd argue the guy himself wasn't even one until the worms wriggled in through his ear holes and started munching on his grey matter.

I'd understand why you might not want to watch a new show that he came out with today, but as far as I can tell he's probably never going to work in telly in any serious capacity ever again.
>> No. 24034 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 8:18 pm
24034 spacer
>>24033

I know what you mean, but I don't think that people suddenly decide the work is bad, just that some people can't tune out the part of their brain that whispers "the bloke who wrote this is a proper cunt now" which probably dampens the fun.

Lostprophets first album is still an absolute banger, but when I listen to it, it's quite hard not to associate it with baby fucking, regardless of whether or not he had fucked any babies at the time of recording.
>> No. 24035 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 8:40 pm
24035 spacer
>>24033
Art is always subjective, even novels, even screeds, even tweets and the great thing about art is that the interpretation will matter more than the intention.
>> No. 24036 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 9:20 pm
24036 spacer
It's weird because it's only really seemingly an issue if the artist/creator in question is alive today and subject to today's moral standards.

We probably don't know what Michealangelo or Da Vinci's politics were but I doubt they were exactly politically correct by today's standards, yet that's not stopping anyone flocking to see their works as great monuments of man's achievements. We can simply wave our hands and say "Well, it doesn't matter, those were different times, they were bound to have beleived things we'd find absurd today."

So I don't see why it's so much different to say "Ah, Father Ted. One of the best sitcoms ever made. Shame the writer eventually succumbed to crippling mindworms, but what can you do."
>> No. 24037 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 9:44 pm
24037 spacer
>>24036
I can overlook Chevy Chase being a horrible piece of shit, I can overlook Bowie potentially being a nonce, I can overlook Woody Allen dating his stepdaughter etc. I don't know if it's because Linehan is particularly vocal about his dodgy beliefs, but it really sours me on his work.
>> No. 24038 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 9:58 pm
24038 spacer
>>24036
People are toppling statues because they don't match today's social standards. Moan ticked because I can separate art and artist.

>>24037
>I can overlook Bowie potentially being a nonce

I thought this was pretty open knowledge? Honestly for a rockstar of the era I think the game of pretend he used to put on about being a Nazi aristocrat is more odd.
>> No. 24039 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 10:23 pm
24039 spacer
>>24036
>So I don't see why it's so much different to say "Ah, Father Ted. One of the best sitcoms ever made. Shame the writer eventually succumbed to crippling mindworms, but what can you do."

This is the grown-up view. I never really liked Glinner from his postings and views on various things - the trans stuff has just kind of washed over me a bit (and I'm probably more of a TERF than I want to admit). I don't expect anyone, let alone artists, to be perfect people.

Another great example of this is Eric Gill, creator of the font Gill Sans among other things. He was a proper, actual wrong'un, abusing his daughters, sisters, and dog. Should we cancel everyone who uses that font?
>> No. 24040 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 10:28 pm
24040 spacer
I can overlook Glinner being Glinner when I watch Father Ted but not when I watch the IT Crowd because it hasn't stood the test of time and I don't think it's very good.
>> No. 24041 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 10:33 pm
24041 spacer
>>24040
Never saw the appeal of The IT Crowd. Even as a cynical "geek" myself, it all felt kind of shit. The equivalent of one of those t-shirts that say "I'm fluent in sarcasm".
>> No. 24042 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 10:37 pm
24042 spacer
>>24041
Quite. It's not too different to that American "Bazinga" show.
>> No. 24043 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 10:46 pm
24043 spacer
>>24041
>>24040
>>24042
For me it's incredibly hit or miss. Some episodes are genuinely fantastic and have me laughing from start to finish, others are bizarrely awful. I was dumbfounded by how bad the grand finale was. It felt dated by the time of broadcast and on reflection maybe it was an early sign that Linehan was about to become a fullscale social media weirdo.
>> No. 24044 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 10:51 pm
24044 spacer
>>24040
>>24041
>>24042
>>24043

That one sketch about the smoking area will always stick with me, but other than that... Yeah, struggling to remember anything.

Oh, the Countdown one? That was good.
>> No. 24045 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 10:52 pm
24045 spacer
I've been watching Maid recently, I thought it was a good show. Well written. Quality of acting variable but never below average.

>>24043
Which ones are particularly good? I'm bored enough to give them a go.
>> No. 24046 Anonymous
12th October 2021
Tuesday 11:20 pm
24046 spacer
>>24044
>>24045
"Italian for Beginners" is one that makes me laugh. Not watched it in years don't shout at me if it's not very good.

Also even it's not a great show it's not Big Bang Theory bad, Britain's not done anything that bad since the end of empire.
>> No. 24047 Anonymous
13th October 2021
Wednesday 1:30 am
24047 spacer
>>24038
>People are toppling statues because they don't match today's social standards.

This isn't really the thread for it, but I think a more charitable reading is that the statues are being topples because we don't think these people are to be honoured or emulated. I don't think anyone is wanting the people on the statues and their accomplishments to be erased from history, just that they shouldn't be celebrated. Sure it was a different time, but if there is a statue of someone who owned slaves, I can name one group of people who knew slavery was bad and wrong -- the slaves.

On a completely unrelated note, the Trailer Park Boys conversation. The first few seasons are great, because it's so rough and ready, and there are some truly fucking hilarious slapstick bits in there. As the seasons went on, it really did come off the rails a bit and the Netflix seasons are just a bit ridiculous. I watched their newest series called "Jail", which they entirely self-made and is funded by going to their own Swearnet site. IMO it's the closest to capturing the stupidity of the original few series as they've come in a while simply because they have no money but still have to make it work.
>> No. 24048 Anonymous
13th October 2021
Wednesday 2:11 am
24048 spacer
>>24047

>I don't think anyone is wanting the people on the statues and their accomplishments to be erased from history

Those people certainly do exist.

But that's really a different thing. The statues are active declarations that this was a great person, someone worthy of respect and remembrance- And, of course, a testament to the fact they were wealthy and influential enough in life to secure that kind of legacy for themselves. Removing the statues is simply saying "Nah, we've changed our minds about the level of renown this person should have."

Of course there's another conversation about whom the statue was of, and what, exactly, their historical wrongdoings were; during last year's statue-topple fever there were one or two instances of people jumping the gun a bit and going for otherwise pretty respectable people on the basis that durr muh white patriarchy bla bla bla, but like anything you're going to have a bit of stupidity bleed in around the edges.

Okay I'm being a bit more lenient than how I really feel here, in complete honesty I think most of it was stupid, but I do want to believe there was a decent and earnestly respectable idea behind some of it, at least.

Who knows though, the important thing to keep in mind to me is that values are relative, morals are social consensus, there is no true right or wrong. Some people thing that's hogwash but in my view those people are mentally deficient. It's plainly and obviously true. Some day in five hundred years after the climate apocalypse, humanity might think slavery is great again because it's the only way we can power our post-post-industrial survival economy, and put all those statues back up.

Swings and roundabouts in the end.
>> No. 24049 Anonymous
13th October 2021
Wednesday 3:24 am
24049 spacer
>>24048

I think the intent and the outcomes are at odds with each other. A statue of a slave trader is an opportunity to discuss, learn and teach in a way that an empty plinth isn't.

I've said this before, but of all the cities in Britain, Liverpool has by far the most visible legacy of slavery and by far the greatest understanding of slavery.

Many of the most prominent streets in Liverpool are named after slave traders and most of the locals know at least a few of them. After the summer of statue toppling, the City Council decided not to rename those streets, but to erect plaques explaining who those people are and what they did. Notably, that decision was made in close collaboration with both the Liverpool black community and the International Slavery Museum; the plaques will be named in honour of Eric Lynch, a local historian who for decades provided slavery walking tours.

Whether the people responsible realise it or not, toppling statues just serves to brush history under the carpet and perpetuate a false and simplistic understanding of the transatlantic slave trade. I'm reminded of how poppywashing has gradually replaced the horrors of the First World War with trite cliches about valour and sacrifice; denouncing slavery is just empty rhetoric if we don't actually understand and engage with the history.
>> No. 24050 Anonymous
13th October 2021
Wednesday 8:10 am
24050 spacer
>>24048
>But that's really a different thing. The statues are active declarations that this was a great person, someone worthy of respect and remembrance- And, of course, a testament to the fact they were wealthy and influential enough in life to secure that kind of legacy for themselves. Removing the statues is simply saying "Nah, we've changed our minds about the level of renown this person should have."

I'm not sure about that, I don't think there's an overt link to worship and I think people perceiving ones are simple. The monuments of a culture are reflective of the values of that culture, and these things change over time. They're not active worship, they're incidental references. It's kind of you to give the benefit of the doubt, but the people tearing these things down can't conceive of the idea that someone can look at this and go "I wonder what this piece of history is about" rather than "Wow, that person must have been good and I should emulate them". Fuck, I hate those people.

>>24049
Right so the thing here is, has Bridgerton got it right? I'd really prefer it if it hadn't, but it's only fair to consider the idea that pretending everyone got along and Nothing Ever Happened might actually lead to more harmony?
>> No. 24051 Anonymous
13th October 2021
Wednesday 8:51 am
24051 spacer
>>24050
>the people tearing these things down can't conceive of the idea that someone can look at this and go "I wonder what this piece of history is about" rather than "Wow, that person must have been good and I should emulate them".
I don't think many people think either of those things when they look at statues, 99% of the time they're just objects in the landscape, street furniture. But they're still going to make the place feel actively hostile to the people whose family and ancestors were raped, murdered, enslaved or generally exploited by them. How many statues of Thatcher are there up north? Pretending statues are there for educational purposes is just pretending.
>> No. 24052 Anonymous
13th October 2021
Wednesday 12:28 pm
24052 spacer
>>24050
What's Bridgerton got to do with anything? Its alternate universe where racism faded out amongst the Regency gentry is not to pretend it didn't exist in reality, but to open the casting of gentry characters to people of colour. It's fiction. There was no Bridgerton family or Lady Whistledown either, y'know, but that doesn't seem to be as important when suspending your disbelief?
>> No. 24053 Anonymous
13th October 2021
Wednesday 12:30 pm
24053 spacer
>>24050

>has Bridgerton got it right?

I don't think it has, no. The real history is just too interesting and too enlightening.

The facile "slavery is bad" narrative imagines that Africa was a place of peace and harmony until the Bad Awful Europeans showed up and tricked the naive natives onto boats with beads and trinkets. This is, on reflection, quite obviously based on racist tropes.

The truth is that long before the Europeans turned up, most of Africa was ruled by an assortment of powerful African empires. By some accounts, Mansa Musa (ruler of the Mali Empire from 1312 to 1337) was the wealthiest man ever to have lived. These empires had an established trade in slaves, mainly of people captured in war. When European explorers arrived in Africa, they found existing slave markets. African empires traded slaves with the Europeans for useful and valuable goods - primarily steel, guns, cloth and rum.

There was a significant slave trade in the opposite direction, led by the Berbers of North Africa. They used their powerful navies to raid coastal cities and capture slaves from as far north as Scandinavia and as far west as America. This trade led to the Barbary Wars of 1801 and 1815, fought between America and the Ottoman Empire in an effort to end attacks by Berber pirates.

Africa hasn't existed in a permanent state of victimhood, it was a competitive global power until African empires were undermined by European military and naval technology in the latter part of the industrial revolution. European empires that colonised Africa were brutal and exploitative, but that was pretty much par for the course. Africa suffered a humiliating couple of centuries, but it is rapidly catching up and the European-American dominance of the current global order is being rapidly brought to an end by a resurgent China.

In short: we're all bastards, all of our forefathers have got someone's blood on their hands, nobody stays at the top for long and every dog has his day.
>> No. 24054 Anonymous
13th October 2021
Wednesday 12:45 pm
24054 spacer
>>24053

We can take down all our statues of Mansa Musa too if that's important.
>> No. 24055 Anonymous
13th October 2021
Wednesday 1:08 pm
24055 spacer
>>24054

My point is that we should be adding rather than subtracting, learning rather than forgetting. Nobody learns anything from an empty plinth, but people can learn from a plaque or a memorial or a museum.
>> No. 24056 Anonymous
13th October 2021
Wednesday 1:17 pm
24056 spacer
>>24055

I don't think any of the people who want to take the statues down have objected to them being relocated to museums. They've even been suggesting it. Putting up plaques that explain who the person was and why they're no longer celebrated has also been accepted as a compromise in some places.
>> No. 24057 Anonymous
13th October 2021
Wednesday 1:40 pm
24057 spacer
>>24051
Rome isn't taking down its statues to appease the Jews. At some point you need to write these things off and move on. America has a huge problem with this as it's basically unique, being a 400 year old nation and a 250 year old state, almost exclusively built off slave labour of a specific ethnicity (forgetting the Irish and the Ities for the moment). Its entire context has been based on exploitation and segregation of race, whereas we can all look back a few thousand years and see everyone murdering and enslaving everyone else in an equal opportunity conquest.

>>24052
Because it's /v/, and let's consider why someone might have raised a show which presents a sanitised version of history where everyone was chummy regardless of race. Considering the damage that Baz Luhrmann did with his masterpiece R+J, it's quite clear that for the average punter, the most popular adaptation of something (regardless of whether or not it's real) is basically how it happened.

>>24055
I second this, it's the Mein Kampf approach. Don't censor it from circulation or make it a black market thing, flood the market with annotated copies that break down the content and turn it into a learning tool *against* the views espoused, so the content exists entwined with a rebuttal. Then you just need a good enough education system so people can understand the rebuttals.

We could go the Roman route instead, and pretend these people never existed by recarving statues and repurposing monuments, but then the rebuttal is lost with the content.

If people are uncomfortable with the fact that modern society was built on thousands of years of bloody conquest and enslavement, to the extent that they try to deny it happened by pretending we never held these figures up, then their opinion isn't worth much. While there are a sizeable amount who want to put these things in museums, as we've seen with Edward Colston, there's also a sizeable contingent who simply want to erase this stuff.
>> No. 24058 Anonymous
13th October 2021
Wednesday 1:44 pm
24058 spacer
>>24057
>Rome isn't taking down its statues to appease the Jews.
Nah but Germany did.
>> No. 24059 Anonymous
13th October 2021
Wednesday 1:48 pm
24059 spacer

a36b48371e776c65c4148e50f91f6637.jpg
240592405924059
Surprised we've not had a cunt-off over this yet. Why did you do it, lads, Gordon was good boy who just wanted to tear down Blair's legacy and paralyse government with indecision.

>>24047
I hate how this conversation automatically goes to the slavery issue. Like >>24050 statues have a permeance that often leads to them being pulled down by changing circumstances - with the former Soviet Bloc being instead probably the biggest example in history. I've seen it theorised that statues are one of the key things that has led to permeance of groups and with the printing press propped up the formation of nationalism, in Europe we went from tribal confederations that lasted a generation or two at the fall of Rome to nation states that are unlikely to disappear anytime soon. Obviously that didn't work for communism but the pyramids are a focal point of Egyptian identity even if they were periodically robbed and restored across dynasties much as we will bury and unearth old VHS tapes of Father Ted in future.

Anyway, unlike stories, statues can't just be changed when they clash with our modern circumstances which infuriates people. Media is like this as well as it's a permanent narrative but unlike statues we can care more about the sculptor behind it. And for Star Wars, the sculptor tore all the statues down and replaced them with slightly worse versions.
>> No. 24060 Anonymous
13th October 2021
Wednesday 10:37 pm
24060 spacer
>>24031

Father Ted in my mind does feel artificial but also a bit uncanny in it's surreal reflection of rural life, which is why I find to so funny. Just a lot of characters you could imagine finding in a rural community cranked up to 11.
Probably helps that I live in Ireland too.
>> No. 24061 Anonymous
13th October 2021
Wednesday 10:46 pm
24061 spacer
>>24059
The documentary hasn't bothered me as much as I expected (I suspect because it omits rather than misrepresents most of what I care deeply about), but I suddenly noticed why Labour is completely and utterly doomed while watching it: It's mostly old men reminiscing about when they were young and thought they were cool, or how cool they thought other people were. The bulk of the media landscape is set up in a way that supports them in doing this, plenty of publications are full of people who are themselves sad old nostalgists or who were brought up under the tutelage of sad old nostalgists and wish they could've been there and felt the buzz to see scary grin man point out that dawn had broken. Even those who don't tend to be incurious politics knowers who've never bothered to look much before 1992 when skimreading the Wikipedia articles about general elections. So we're trapped going back over Blair/Brown again and again and again. It's like if Labour were still obsessing over learning the lessons of Wilson c. 1974 in 1990. Worse, it's like if Marcia Williams and Bernard Donoughue were still regularly giving advice to the leadership in 1990. Advice with a quality like: What is Labour's way out of the crisis? the last time we won an election, it was because we offered a better way out of the crisis...
>> No. 24062 Anonymous
13th October 2021
Wednesday 10:55 pm
24062 spacer

MV5BYjEwMGZkYTgtMTA5Ny00OWFhLTgzMWItYjhhMWUxYTIxND.jpg
240622406224062
I'm going to watch The Man Who Wasn't There in a bit. A friend recommended it, supposed to be some kind of film noir thriller. And it's by the Coen Brothers, so it should be good.
>> No. 24063 Anonymous
14th October 2021
Thursday 12:16 am
24063 spacer
>>24062
It is. Make sure you don't watch the colour version, it's not that kind of movie.
>> No. 24064 Anonymous
14th October 2021
Thursday 1:21 am
24064 spacer
>>24063

I'm about halfway in now, and I'm kind of struggling to like the movie. I'm a fan of classic film noir and of the Coen brothers as well, but this feels more like a pastiche of the genre where someone has ticked off a list of the usual elements but missed the mark and essentially created a colour-desaturated period piece instead of a kind of film that is on par with some of classic noir's legendary films.
>> No. 24065 Anonymous
14th October 2021
Thursday 7:58 am
24065 spacer
>>24064

That said, having watched the whole of it now, the aliens in Fargo series 2 kind of make more sense now. As does Lorne Malvo's hook knife in series 1.
>> No. 24066 Anonymous
18th October 2021
Monday 1:22 am
24066 spacer
>>24061
I have really been fascinated by the parallels drawn to the current situation. Everyone thought Labour would win in 1992, then somehow they didn't. Then, the party had internal battles that seem to have been identical to the ones currently being had. All in all, this series seems to be very pro-Keir Starmer, explaining how plenty of people didn't want Tony Blair to do what Keir Starmer's doing now, but he was totally right and it worked. I've said a few times that Keir Starmer is going to win the next election, and I really can't see how he is going to do that from his current position, but the New Labour BBC documentary feels like it agrees with me.
>> No. 24067 Anonymous
18th October 2021
Monday 2:31 am
24067 spacer

Opinion_polling_for_the_1997_United_Kingdom_genera.png
240672406724067
>>24066
I think the documentary has that sort of slant as well, but the parallels seem tenuous to me. Starmer feels closer to Kinnock in 1987-92 than to Blair in 94. Blair made a big show of "taking on" the party in the 1990s, but it was more showmanship than serious. (For example, the "Clause IV" moment. Very stylish, but what substance? It's not like Blair and Brown would've been committed nationalisers had it not gone through.) The real fighting was in the 1980s and by the 1988 leadership election the left was well and truly cowed. Little things like that tend to be omitted, or in the case of Black Wednesday be glossed over, but they make all the analogies quite confusing when you throw them back into the mix.
If you haven't seen it, I'd recommend "Labour - the Wilderness Years", which is up on YouTube. It's from the mid 1990s when it was reasonably clear Blair was going to win the next election and gives the pretty standard story on Labour in the 1980s and early 1990s, but because the 1997 landslide hadn't happened yet a lot was still in contention and you get dissenting voices and hints of the long forgotten paths Labour could've taken beyond Bennism and Blairism.
>> No. 24100 Anonymous
18th November 2021
Thursday 5:19 pm
24100 spacer

254731876_318654279760398_1288183138623502563_n.png
241002410024100
Been watching Columbo from start to finish.

Despite its absolutely unchanging formula, and the reduction in stakes that provides, the 70s ones have an undeniable charm. I don't know how they do it, though - episodes can run up to 90 minutes in length, but it feels like there still wasn't enough time. They end so abruptly.

Nonetheless, the 70s ones were very very very tame. They never showed so much as a drop of blood, and despite the parade of grimy middle aged men with models for wives/girlfriends, the most you saw was a kiss, and that was only for a couple of episodes. Many of them had some interesting setup.

I've now got to the second run, set up by Falk himself in 1989. The budget and tech are clearly leagues ahead (it's in widescreen on what I think is 35mm film which for a TV show in 89 is pretty forward-thinking, meaning it's almost HD even now, the camera shots are much less static, and the lighting etc is much more 'luxurious'). It's just... so much more 80s. Sure there's a little more violence shown, but not much; the real centre is the sex. Pretty much every episide revolves around some grimy man constantly shagging models, and every plot is something to do with that. So, despite all the nicer filming, it feels distinctly cheaper because it feels like it's more about showing as many Fit Birds as it can.
>> No. 24101 Anonymous
20th November 2021
Saturday 1:11 am
24101 spacer

Cowboy_Bebop_Netflix_Poster.jpg
241012410124101
It's happening
>> No. 24102 Anonymous
20th November 2021
Saturday 9:04 am
24102 spacer
>>24101
Well, they kept Tank! at least (and a few other bits of the OST). It's a bit more happy go lucky than noir but as adaptations go it's not terrible.
>> No. 24103 Anonymous
20th November 2021
Saturday 12:36 pm
24103 spacer
>>24101
Is Edward in it? The only episode of Cowboy Bebop I've seen was the one where they trip on mushrooms. I didn't like Edward.
>> No. 24104 Anonymous
20th November 2021
Saturday 3:02 pm
24104 spacer
>>24101>>24102>>24103

It's better than I thought it would be, and quite frustrating, in that it looks great (other than the main characters costuming looking a bit too cosplay), the fight scenes are well done, the cg is good, the atmosphere is pretty much on point. But the dialogue is pretty fucking bad for the most part. They've gone a different direction with the main bad guy too, which doesn't feel as interesting as the anime version. He's sort of pathetic, where he's supposed to be mysterious and scary.

All in all if the anime didn't exist, I'd have enjoyed this as schlocky sci fi, but either way the dialogue and story beats need a lot of work. Mind you I'm only 4 or 5 episodes in.

>>24103

Yes, they appear at the end of the last episode. I won't post the clip here but....fucking hell, a 1:1 adaptation was not a good idea. If you didn't like them in the original you will certainly not enjoy them here.
>> No. 24105 Anonymous
28th November 2021
Sunday 6:54 pm
24105 spacer

theoutlaws.jpg
241052410524105
Disappointed in Stephen Merchant with this. I don't know how it's possible to have such a great cast for such a pedestrian, forgettable script.

>Writer Stephen Merchant has stated the idea for the show ... about how having people from different walks of life placed into the same situation would make an interesting plot line.
That was probably true the first time it was done.

It's not terrible. It's fine. I mean, it's okay. Why bother?
>> No. 24106 Anonymous
28th November 2021
Sunday 8:24 pm
24106 spacer
>>24105

Has Stephen Merchant ever been anything but pedestrian and forgettable?
>> No. 24107 Anonymous
28th November 2021
Sunday 8:29 pm
24107 spacer
>>24106

His (intentionally) incredibly uncomfortable performance in Hello Ladies made me think he was the reason The Office was any good, considering how unfunny Gervais is on his own.
>> No. 24108 Anonymous
29th November 2021
Monday 1:21 pm
24108 spacer
>>24105
Fuck me but he was plugging the hell out of this a few weeks ago. I think he was on three channels' primetime chat shows simultaneously at one point.
>> No. 24109 Anonymous
29th November 2021
Monday 2:12 pm
24109 spacer
>>24108
They record them at different times. He's not running live from one studio to the next.

I watched the first episode of The Outlaws and thought it was shit so gave up.
>> No. 24110 Anonymous
29th November 2021
Monday 3:00 pm
24110 spacer
>>24109
Oh, I thought perhaps he was using clones.
>> No. 24111 Anonymous
29th November 2021
Monday 3:13 pm
24111 spacer
>>24110
Nah, he just has that kind of look about him.
>> No. 24112 Anonymous
29th November 2021
Monday 3:20 pm
24112 spacer
>>24108
Did he share the same wacky fun anecdotes each time? I saw Hugh Jackman do that on a few programmes within the same week about eleven years ago, and I completely lost faith in the journalistic integrity of Graham Norton.
>> No. 24113 Anonymous
29th November 2021
Monday 3:41 pm
24113 spacer
>>24112
I had something similar about the same time with Frankie Boyle recycling the same material in his stand-up.
>> No. 24114 Anonymous
29th November 2021
Monday 4:52 pm
24114 spacer

0dqxyxcjwh821.jpg
241142411424114
>>24112

I always thought this was pretty cheap:

According to one of the reddit pages that came up when I was looking for the image, this urban legend has been going around Finland for decades. I don't know if that's better or worse than Jack stealing it from what looks like /int/.
>> No. 24115 Anonymous
29th November 2021
Monday 4:59 pm
24115 spacer
>>24114
>I don't know if that's better or worse than Jack stealing it from what looks like /int/.

He's been caught out stealing material from Stewart Lee and other comedians before.
>> No. 24116 Anonymous
29th November 2021
Monday 11:46 pm
24116 spacer
>>24115

I really can't think of a joke from are stew that he would be capable of delivering.
>> No. 24117 Anonymous
30th November 2021
Tuesday 4:10 am
24117 spacer
>>24116
>He shows a touch of naivety in places – at one point repeating, almost verbatim, a very old Stewart Lee sketch about walking on the moon

https://The Metro is owned by the Daily Mail./2009/08/24/jack-whitehall-is-a-comic-on-the-rise-363267/

Whitehall's response to was to delete all evidence of his routine from the internet.
>> No. 24118 Anonymous
30th November 2021
Tuesday 4:20 am
24118 spacer
>>24116

90s Stew was a different beast. He had actual jokes back then, instead of just two hour long self-satirising monologues.

Interestingly though you can see the formula starting to take shape, even in his really early stuff. I wonder what he'd be like now if he hadn't gone off on that whole detour doing Jerry Springer: The Opera.
>> No. 24119 Anonymous
30th November 2021
Tuesday 10:02 am
24119 spacer
>>24105
I get very wary of anything that looks like it has a cast member who's essentially been stunt casted. Maybe I'm just tainted because I've know Walken to be a meme as much as a movie star.
>> No. 24120 Anonymous
30th November 2021
Tuesday 10:21 am
24120 spacer
>>24119
There's one scene with him in that looks as though it was deliberately put there in hopes it'll be made into a meme. Then at the end he paints over a real Banksy, which has no relevance to the plot whatsoever, it's purely there so they can say it happened.
>> No. 24121 Anonymous
27th December 2021
Monday 3:40 am
24121 spacer

mortimer-whitehouse-gone-fishing-gone-christmas-fi.jpg
241212412124121
Surprised to see Gazza in this.
>> No. 24122 Anonymous
28th December 2021
Tuesday 8:46 pm
24122 spacer

DEZUXYKXkAERfg4.jpg
241222412224122
I'm re-watching series 3 of Fargo at the moment. Maybe with the exception of series 4, the Fargo TV series is one of the best TV crime drama franchises of the last 20 years. If you haven't watched it, I can only recommend it very highly. Especially if you like the Coen Brothers' body of work, because references to their movies abound throughout, and not just the 1996 film of the same name.

My only real niggle with series 3 is, why do British actors playing British characters in American productions always pander to the expectations of clueless American viewers and either put on a dodgy upper class public school accent, or they go for an exaggerated "Oi mate!" working class sociolect that's all over the map, geographically.

In series 3 of Fargo, David Thewlis plays a vaguely British-born international mastermind heading a billion-dollar organised financial crime syndicate, who use Ewan McGregor's real estate firm to stage a bankruptcy bleedout (worth noting that McGregor himself pulls off a very convincing Minnnesota/Upper Midwest accent). Anyway, Thewlis's watered-down working class accent in that role seems almost deliberately lazy, meandering somewhere between Bristol, Blackpool and South London, if that, but I'm sure it was entirely flying under the radar of most Americans.
>> No. 24123 Anonymous
28th December 2021
Tuesday 10:15 pm
24123 spacer

don-t-look-up-2031-fan-casting-poster-156623-mediu.jpg
241232412324123
The darkest joke out of this film isn't actually in the film, it's the people who only respond to it with criticisms of the medium, repeating the exact same behaviour as the people in the film. Some of them have to be trolling but they can't all be. Astonishing lack of self-awareness.
"You need media training".
>> No. 24124 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 12:22 am
24124 spacer
>>24123

For me the weirdest parts of the film are that they made the President an obvious stand in for Hilary Clinton and the Tech Billionaire a stand in for Joe Biden.

This film is fucking tremendous. I've seen heard a bunch of people draw comparisons to Idiocracy.

The genre is listed as Comedy but really it should be Horror, because nothing is more terrifying than the thought that a group of wealthy narcissistic morons could wield enough power to pose an existential threat to the vitality of the human race...
>> No. 24125 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 1:28 pm
24125 spacer
>>24123
I'll be totally honest and say I don't understand your point. My take away, after an hour of the film, was that not one joke had landed and the director was a ponce who thought his constant cutaways to random objects was injecting some pathos into the meandering scenes.
>> No. 24126 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 1:38 pm
24126 spacer
>>24125
Yes, exactly like that. Well done.
>> No. 24127 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 4:22 pm
24127 spacer
>>24126
What? Because I recognised the great mind behind films like Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues and Step Brothers isn't a brilliant mind, I'm the dafty? Stunt casting Arianna Grande isn't impressive nor is having the Oglethorpe character do a 180 degree turn to be invested in Grande's relationship drama for no reason, but the brain-genius responsible for Get Hard wanted to cut to a gag so it had to happen, even though it undermines everything we've learnt about Oglethorpe up to that point. The Oval Office scene went on for much too long, as it quickly stopped characterising anyone, moving the plot forward or being funny, in fact it never even started on the last one. I'm not a pillock for no sitting through a mediocre film. Once I got to Rylance's character I was basically done, because almost nobody in the film was acting like a human being, even a really self-absorbed and narrowminded one.
>> No. 24128 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 4:37 pm
24128 spacer
>>24127
If you're a dafty it's because you've just watched a satire of how people fixate on the medium rather than the message and your only reaction to it is to fixate on the medium.
>> No. 24129 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 4:57 pm
24129 spacer
>>24128
He's watching a film, he's entitled to criticise the medium. I should make a two hour film of myself crapping into a bucket, claim it's about climate change and then use your same argument to deflect criticism.
>> No. 24130 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 5:00 pm
24130 spacer
>>24129
I'm not deflecting criticism, it's not an amazing piece of film by any of the metrics he's talking about. Nobody's saying it is. But you and he are doing exactly the thing it satirises.
>> No. 24131 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 5:18 pm
24131 spacer
>>24130
Fucking hell, that's genius. All you have to do is make a satire about people criticising the medium instead of the message, and instantly anyone who dislikes your filmmaking has themselves become the object of satire! 4D chess at its finest, well-played indeed.
>> No. 24132 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 5:20 pm
24132 spacer
>>24126

Being deliberately shit so people complain about it to make your satire seem more accurate, is still being shit.
>> No. 24133 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 5:30 pm
24133 spacer
>>24131
>>24132

I'm not a fan of the whole "accusing the other person of being upset as a way to win the argument" but wow.
>> No. 24134 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 5:37 pm
24134 spacer
>>24133
Nobody accused you of being upset.
>> No. 24135 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 5:37 pm
24135 spacer
>>24133

I promise you I'm not upset, your point is just silly.
>> No. 24136 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 5:40 pm
24136 spacer
>>24135
He who denied it, is actually having a massive teary.
>> No. 24137 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 5:52 pm
24137 spacer
>>24135

If you say so. You must be fun to watch films with, I can see you now, complaining about the camera angles in The Muppet Christmas Carol, how they don't even look like real animals and if that one's supposed to be a bear why is it talking instead of eating people?
>> No. 24138 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 6:34 pm
24138 spacer
>>24137

I'm not the person you think I am, never seen this film, I just think you're a cunt.
>> No. 24139 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 7:14 pm
24139 spacer
I am actually really upset right now.

I have not posted in this thread previously, so am neither of the lads embroiled in the cunt-off but my man here is besmirching the good name of the Muppet Christmas Carol, and this, I find to be repugnant.
>> No. 24140 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 7:22 pm
24140 spacer
>>24139

I bet anyone who doesn't like Muppets Christmas Carol is the same sort of person who pretends they don't still remember the name of every Harry Potter professor, and denies that they were ever into Pokemon.

I don't care what you say, if you're between a certain age (which I assume to be the primary .gs demographic), you were into those things, and if you weren't, you must be some kind of undercover agent or cyborg impostor.
>> No. 24141 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 8:47 pm
24141 spacer
>>24127
>What? Because I recognised the great mind behind films like Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues and Step Brothers isn't a brilliant mind, I'm the dafty? Stunt casting Arianna Grande isn't impressive nor is having the Oglethorpe character do a 180 degree turn to be invested in Grande's relationship drama for no reason, but the brain-genius responsible for Get Hard wanted to cut to a gag so it had to happen, even though it undermines everything we've learnt about Oglethorpe up to that point. The Oval Office scene went on for much too long, as it quickly stopped characterising anyone, moving the plot forward or being funny, in fact it never even started on the last one. I'm not a pillock for no sitting through a mediocre film. Once I got to Rylance's character I was basically done, because almost nobody in the film was acting like a human being, even a really self-absorbed and narrowminded one.

What? Because I recognised the great mind behind films like The Honky Problem and Frog Baseball isn't a brilliant mind, I'm the dafty? Stunt casting Terry Crews isn't impressive nor is having the a prostitute get picked up for a top level military experiment for no reason other than a gratuitous emotional setpiece, but the brain-genius responsible for Beavis and Butthead Do America wanted a running gag so it had to happen, even though it undermines everything we've learnt about your mum up to that point.

Wait, I'm just saying why I didn't like it and why I'd already decided I probably wasn't going to like it.

>The Oval Office scene went on for much too long, as it quickly stopped characterising anyone, moving the plot forward or being funny, in fact it never even started on the last one. I'm not a pillock for no sitting through a mediocre film.

This is the one legitimate criticism in your post. Yeah, but I suppose that was to help set the tone that it wasn't going to be serious. I agree though. Not sure what you're talking about with the rest of it though.

>Once I got to cubism I was basically done, because almost nobody in the image looked like a human being, even a really colourful and weird one.
>> No. 24142 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 8:54 pm
24142 spacer
>>24141
I just realised I forgot to make a point - it is heavy handed, it doesn't hide that. I thought some of it was stupid, some of it hamfisted, and some of it masturbatory. But I knew nothing going into it other than Leo was playing someone mildly nerdy. I think you dislike the style/medium.
>> No. 24143 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 9:24 pm
24143 spacer
>>24138

I've never seen The Muppet Christmas Carol either.
>> No. 24144 Anonymous
29th December 2021
Wednesday 9:43 pm
24144 spacer
>>24143
It's pretty good. Better than the Patrick Stewart one, but not quite as good as the Alistair Sim one. It should certainly be on TV every Christmas along with Wallace & Gromit and World's Strongest Man.
>> No. 24145 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 12:12 am
24145 spacer
>>24128
Except the medium is cinema. I'm not criticising all cinema, I'm saying this film is naff and felt like watching a piss-weak The Thick of It knock-off with a message I understood after half-an-hour. "The medium" isn't the problem when Jonah Hill has orders to play his character like he's got an IQ on par with a Jack Russell or Mark Rylance looks like another victim of Liverpool F.C.'s infamous club dentist, for no particular reason. These are bad filmmaking decisions that undermine the tone of the film.
>> No. 24146 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 3:46 am
24146 spacer
>>24145
The medium is this piece of cinema in particular. You could criticise the medium of this post by complaining about the word choice I've used, you wouldn't have to criticise all written language in general. The message is the meaning it conveys.
>> No. 24147 Anonymous
30th December 2021
Thursday 6:29 am
24147 spacer
I for one don't even have a cinema.
>> No. 24159 Anonymous
7th January 2022
Friday 2:06 am
24159 spacer

WhatsApp Image 2022-01-07 at 1.57.44 AM.jpg
241592415924159
Been making my way through Star Trek.

Started with DS9, then TNG, then Voyager, and now on Enterprise.

DS9 was surprisingly good; my only knowledge of Star Trek before that was the few episodes of TNG I saw as a very young kid. TNG I had my reservations about but it was nice and campy and generally a fun watch. Voyager had the darker tone of DS9, but I don't know, it just wasn't as good IMO.

Enterprise is not very good, but is still watchable. It's completely humourless and the one visual gag I've seen up to the third season is what made me post this. I get that it was made in 2004 at the height of George Dubya Bush-ism and so there's always going to be this unspoken Military undertone as everything made at that time period in the USA did, but I feel it betrays the camp hammy utopia.

From what my trekky mates tell me, if I didn't like Enterprise then I'll hate Discovery and Picard.

I'll watch TOS next, I suppose, then the films.

Next I'
>> No. 24160 Anonymous
7th January 2022
Friday 9:41 am
24160 spacer
>>24159

I haven't seen much else; TNG, the reboot movies and three-quarters of the first episode of Picard before turning it off. I just saw the first three seasons of Discovery and while it's not the most amazing thing ever, it's not humourless or militaristic. Maybe a little militaristic in places but the main characters actively complain about it when it happens, internal conflict in the Federation about how they're not supposed to be soldiers is a whole thing.
>> No. 24161 Anonymous
7th January 2022
Friday 9:55 pm
24161 spacer

81bAdsII1FL._AC_SL1500_.jpg
241612416124161
I rewatched the first episode of pic related. Going in I was slightly nervous it might be awful upon revisiting it, but no, it's really, really good. I'm actually so amazed by how good it is I can't quite believe it.
>> No. 24162 Anonymous
8th January 2022
Saturday 10:10 am
24162 spacer
What We Do in the Shadows series three has at least one good joke per episode but I wish they'd stop putting Kristen Schaal into things.
>> No. 24163 Anonymous
8th January 2022
Saturday 10:16 am
24163 spacer
>>24162
I've only brought myself to watch three episodes of the new series so far. It feels like a massive drop off from the previous two.
>> No. 24164 Anonymous
9th January 2022
Sunday 3:37 am
24164 spacer
Toast of Tinseltown is okay. Its very Hollywood with all the cameos and it feels weird without any songs but I liked how surreal it got.

It must be an odd life he leads, perpetually living in 1975.

>> No. 24165 Anonymous
9th January 2022
Sunday 11:05 pm
24165 spacer
>>24164
I found the low effort cameos really off-putting. Firstly, they kept reminding me about the pandemic and secondly Paul Rudd in a cheap wig isn’t funny, nor do I believe they’d let Larry David live in Dallas.
>> No. 24167 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 12:45 pm
24167 spacer
The special effects in the TNG films are weird. One minute they are smooth and competent, the next they look worse than the show. I have a feeling they ran up against deadlines.
>> No. 24168 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 6:06 pm
24168 spacer
DS9 is fucking ridiculous.
>> No. 24169 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 6:25 pm
24169 spacer
>>24168

Ridiculously good, you mean? It's the only Trek series to actually engage with meaty moral issues. The first series takes a while to get going and there are some slightly frivolous filler episodes, but on the whole it's the best Star Trek series by some margin.

In the Pale Moonlight and Far Beyond the Stars are amongst the best episodes of any TV drama.
>> No. 24170 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 6:34 pm
24170 spacer

vlcsnap-2022-01-12-18h32m02s738.png
241702417024170
>>24169

It's been entertaining so far but sex pest Bashir, the Nagus, this fucking guy?
>> No. 24171 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 6:53 pm
24171 spacer
>>24170
That fucking guy was class. Love a return to the old camp stuff.

And DS9 is stellar. I have a ST playlist on shuffle with all the Treks up to/including ENT, I've watched them all through a couple of times. I initially disliked the palette of DS9 and the ever present Dominion plots, but I recently caught S7E19 or something and just turned off shuffle and watched the rest of the season. It's fantastic storytelling and great drama.

How's Bashir a sex pest?
>> No. 24172 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 7:02 pm
24172 spacer
>>24171

Bashir hit on what seemed like every female character he interacted with in the first ten episodes despite some of them (Dax) telling him to go away repeatedly. He reminds me a bit of Gaius Baltar.
I'm not really complaining, "fucking ridiculous" is still entertaining.
>> No. 24173 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 7:05 pm
24173 spacer

haveyouseenthisman.jpg
241732417324173
Not sure I like DS9 more than TNG, but once you check out VOY that "sex pest" Bashir will pale in comparison to the walking red flag himself, Neelix. He alone was a big reason I stopped watching and If I'd been captain I'd probably have transported him into space while everyone else slept and said no more about it.
>> No. 24174 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 7:18 pm
24174 spacer

neelix.jpg
241742417424174
>>24173
Isn't wrong. Even Neelix's nose looks like a bellend.
>> No. 24175 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 9:39 pm
24175 spacer
>>24173
There's something so fucking irritating about him. It's a combination of his keenness and self importance, I reckon. Bit of a Nice Guy and far to thirsty for Kes, who is admittedly wonderful and one of my favourite characters in VOY.

He's great as the Nagus though, more of that please. Or just sack him off entirely and have two Doctors. Yes, that's the way.
>> No. 24176 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 12:31 am
24176 spacer
>>24172
His character improves somewhat until the last season when he's revealed to be illegally genetically enhanced.. After that, that's all most of his plots are about and the other characters treat him differently.

>>24173
>>24174
>>24175
I think they were really struggling to know what to do with Neelix after the first couple of seasons, and especially after Kes (eeeee now then) becomes yet another Star Trek God Alien and fucks off. Despite not even being Starfleet, and whilst other crewmen remain unpromoted, he's given loads of important tasks to do just to keep his stories going.

I've just done a fag packet calculation, and since November I've watched about 450 hours of Star Trek material. It'll be a bit weird now I've exhausted everything but a couple of the films and all the new ones.
>> No. 24177 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 12:32 am
24177 spacer

tea.jpg
241772417724177
>>24176
I meant to attach this image.
>> No. 24178 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 12:53 pm
24178 spacer
>>24176

Neelix is like jar jar binks. He is also a nonce, because Kes is only 7 years old.
>> No. 24179 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 9:20 pm
24179 spacer

Season-1-farscape-32199060-1890-1260.jpg
241792417924179
Speaking of aliens, I've started watching Farscape. It's not bad, but every bad guy is a moustache twirling bastard of the highest order and it's really tedious, it's making me miss the problem solving aspect Star Trek has. I'm only on series 1, it could well pick up.
>> No. 24180 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 9:30 pm
24180 spacer
I'm going to watch the Grand Tour. It won't quite be the old Top Gear but fuck it, I need some easily digestible light hearted material that isn't in any way mentally taxing, yet isn't 100% fictional.

Plus it's just the sort of thing my recent ex would have made a snotty comment about because it's a laddish program and she had deep seated penis envy. So now I'm going to enjoy it judgement free.
>> No. 24181 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 9:37 pm
24181 spacer

Harvey_2.jpg
241812418124181
>>24179
But plus side it has scorpius, and he ends up as a kind of well developed antagonist towards the end.

I think farscape was really let down by the main character human guy who was so generic and 2D that I can't remember his name.

I love the show mostly just for the character and set designs, I think it all holds up remarkably well even against modern state of the art CGI, and they all have a real alien-ness that most other franchises don't ever reach.
>> No. 24182 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 10:33 pm
24182 spacer
>>24179

Most of the main bad guys in season 1 develop as the series goes on.

>>24181

The costumes, prosthetics and puppets are what really sell Farscape for me, so much so that I can overlook the excessive horniness of the characters and overall absolute silliness, although past Moya a lot of the set design can be very vintage Star Trek levels of shoddy.
Scorpius (and Harvey) are some all-time great villains.

I wouldn't mind the series rebooted with more modern day polish. Any combat in the series is comical for the most part which is a shame when D'Argo is meant to be a competent warrior, and the character development and writing can be inconsistent, to say the least.
>> No. 24183 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 10:42 pm
24183 spacer
>>24181
He's not rocked up yet, but I rememeber him from the episodes I saw when I snuck out of bed as a wee'un to watch TV. It's hard to forget the grey skinned space gimp, especially at such a formative age. I also recall being really impressed when I saw him take the tube thing out of the side of his head.

I agree it holds up, visually and otherwise. There's a bit of wonky CGI, but nothing Babylon 5 bad. John Q. Everyman is a bit of a blank slate, I guess, he is literally called John after all. I'd probably describe him, so far, as a homeopathically watered down Han Solo.

It does rankle a niche issue of mine though, which is too many alien races. Just flesh out a few properly rather than having a million puddle deep ones. Complete none issue really, I'd just like it that way.
>> No. 24184 Anonymous
14th January 2022
Friday 5:34 am
24184 spacer
>>24180

It's pretty enjoyable, it's mostly a more polished version of that era of Top Gear. As a car saddo, I felt they paid more attention to the actual motors, but without becoming boring for 99% of normal people who don't really care how many cylinders car x has.
>> No. 24185 Anonymous
14th January 2022
Friday 9:25 am
24185 spacer
>>24180>>24184

There's a Canadian YouTube lad with a channel called FortNine that essentially does a version of those 10 minute classic Top Gear segments, but for motorcycles.

It sounds like it should be awful, but the production value is through the roof and they really do their research. Their genuine interest in bikes really shines through, would highly recommend it.
>> No. 24186 Anonymous
14th January 2022
Friday 6:20 pm
24186 spacer

271593114_2563657297097834_1664285678140230925_n (.png
241862418624186
Picard is shit. I've just watched the first three episodes and I'd swear the writers have only watched a 5-minute precis of TNG before writing a generic modern sci-fi story and aesthetic. Where's the campy aesthetic? The first thing I thought was that this is Blade Runner 2049 without the pollution -- the cyberpunk wireframe holograms for everything and ships that look like nightclubs.

Also because it's a Modern Sci-Fi Story it's got to be Dark and Moody and Brooding; everyone's got a dark and troubled past, there are millions of clandestine conversations in dimly-lit rooms set to tense music. All the fun has been drained out of it and it just feels like a generic Dark Sci-Fi/Superhero Story you'd see out of the streaming services.
>> No. 24187 Anonymous
14th January 2022
Friday 7:14 pm
24187 spacer

eventhorizonisn'tverygoodreally.png
241872418724187
>>24186
>Picard is shit. I've just watched the first three episodes
See you in seven hours, neophyte.
>> No. 24188 Anonymous
14th January 2022
Friday 9:58 pm
24188 spacer
>>24184

I'm not a car saddo, but I am a general purpose saddo, so I never minded the nerdy detail about cars. However I can't help but feel the lads themselves are right about modern cars being more gizmo than vehicle, and it really makes it difficult to care about most of them- Plus, it's different as an adult, where I know I'll never own the flashy supercar, than it was as a teenlad, when I still thought one day I might. Much of the magic is lost without the childish naivete to fantasize, I suppose, but I guess that's why they call it car porn.

The recent Madagascar episode was probably my favourite.
>> No. 24189 Anonymous
16th January 2022
Sunday 6:30 pm
24189 spacer
>>24186

I agree with your tonal and aesthetic points, but Picard is also shit because it misses the entire point of Star Trek, which is to depict a future worth aspiring to (with varying degrees of campness). It's bloody cynical.
>> No. 24190 Anonymous
16th January 2022
Sunday 6:44 pm
24190 spacer
I can see why you were surprised I called Bashir a sex-pest, he's toned it down completely since. But for the first few episodes it was relentless.
>> No. 24191 Anonymous
16th January 2022
Sunday 7:26 pm
24191 spacer
>>24189
That's what I meant when referencing BR49.
I hear the same is also true for Discovery -- everything is a bit dystopic and shit.

>>24190
Not sure where you're up to, but don't think you're out of the woods completely -- there are a couple of episodes where the sex pestery re-emerges.
>> No. 24192 Anonymous
16th January 2022
Sunday 9:33 pm
24192 spacer
>>24191

There are some great episodes, but there's a comment on one of the youtube videos about Alamarain
>The plot of most first season DS9 episodes is "We've discovered a new and deeply annoying culture"
every now and then it proves itself very true.
>> No. 24193 Anonymous
16th January 2022
Sunday 11:48 pm
24193 spacer
>>24192
There's an episode in the first season -- Move Along Home if I remember the title correctly -- which is just that but in my opinion truly dire.

I'd say the average episode-to-episode quality of DS9 is higher than that of any other Star Trek, but there still are some bombs.

That said, it does turn into a bit of a soap at times (there are several episodes that use the phrase '...I'm dying' before cutting to the intro), but I suppose that's a consequence of the writers being allowed to write in interpersonal conflicts/romance following Roddenberry's death.
>> No. 24194 Anonymous
17th January 2022
Monday 1:26 pm
24194 spacer
Where's a good place to start with Star Trek? I'm watching TNG at the moment and enjoying it. It is for some reason an incredibly relaxing and comforting programme.
>> No. 24195 Anonymous
17th January 2022
Monday 2:07 pm
24195 spacer
>>24194
I did a breakdown somewhere in the Star Trek thread but basically if you go from TNG and pay attention to broadcast order you can't go wrong and it's what is recommended anyway. TOS can be revisited.

And then Babylon 5, Farscape and X-Files. Made for television sci-fi from the era is incredibly good.
>> No. 24196 Anonymous
17th January 2022
Monday 5:12 pm
24196 spacer
>>24195
Is there any reason you excluded Stargate? I've not seen them since the first season originally aired but it's surely part of that bracket? And BSG for that matter although I found it quite hard to get into.
>> No. 24197 Anonymous
18th January 2022
Tuesday 10:43 pm
24197 spacer
Started watching Farscape on the advice of this thread. Absolutely fucking lost it when I heard the first Space Australians talk.

Despite it being an Aus/American co-production it seems the majority of the actors are Australian, and few of them are doing aussie accents -- there's the main lass who sounds liek Big Suze, and the episode-to-episode characters are often Australians doing American accents, but end up being betrayed by their vowels.

Also, I didn't know it was possible to have sillier hand-to-hand fighting than in Star Trek, but here we are.
>> No. 24198 Anonymous
20th January 2022
Thursday 3:25 pm
24198 spacer
Are you lads sincerely talking about Farscape? What a dream come true, my long-dead thread has been vindicated.
>> No. 24199 Anonymous
20th January 2022
Thursday 3:40 pm
24199 spacer
>>24198
Assuming you’re the resident Farscape head, were the writers into A Song of Ice and Fire? Because John and Aeryn seemed like a coincidence but then that Stark fellow turned up and I convinced myself there was something to it.
>> No. 24200 Anonymous
20th January 2022
Thursday 8:17 pm
24200 spacer
>>24198
Talking about Farscape, but Fraggle Rock's back. Fuck Yeah!

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password