[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
women

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply [First 100 posts]
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 33915)
Message
File  []
close
Emma-Haslam-pole-dancer-main-pic.jpg
339153391533915
>> No. 33915 Anonymous
26th May 2014
Monday 12:52 pm
33915 Plus sized girls
I have a fetish for them. Not just fat, but big, heavy girls with big knockers. My GF looks a lot like her, I am so lucky to have found a GF that satisfies my fetish!
Expand all images.
>> No. 33921 Anonymous
26th May 2014
Monday 2:32 pm
33921 spacer
Good for you, lad.

I wouldn't consider myself or anyone else lucky for having an obese bird, but your relationship is at least removing one fatty from the dating pool, and for that I commend you and thank you for your sacrifice.
>> No. 33922 Anonymous
26th May 2014
Monday 3:27 pm
33922 spacer
>>33915
Any pictures of your girlfriend, then?
>> No. 33923 Anonymous
26th May 2014
Monday 3:35 pm
33923 spacer
Ever noticed that most chubby chasers are usually skinny white dudes with ponytails?
>> No. 33924 Anonymous
26th May 2014
Monday 4:06 pm
33924 spacer
>>33923

There is a graphic somewhere online about it.

Coefficient being length of ponytail x a variable I can't remember = weight of girlfriend.
>> No. 33932 Anonymous
27th May 2014
Tuesday 12:23 pm
33932 spacer

dorsfeline.jpg
339323393233932
>>33921
Not a sacrifice, lad. Try hugging a fat girl, squeezing her G cups while you make sweet love with her. You will never go back, trust me.

>>33922
Not here. Just imagine Emma Haslam without poledancing.

>>33923
Not skinny, somewhat overweight. No ponytail and not quite white, more Hispanic than white. In my experience, nearly all chubby chasers are athletic or fat dudes, especially blacks. I've never seen a big girl with a fat dude, only fat men with skinny girls or the contrary.
>> No. 33937 Anonymous
28th May 2014
Wednesday 12:16 pm
33937 spacer
>>33932

I'm a skinny white guy, but no ponytail. I like the contrast between a girl's fat body and my own. I put it down to the first girl I fucked being a big lass. And there is something amazingly calming about being able to rest your entire head between two massive breasts and blocking out the world (insert some reference to fight club and allegations of homosexuality here). My only complaint is that the vast majority of porn involving huge fat birds has a brother fucking them. Lucky bastards...
>> No. 33939 Anonymous
28th May 2014
Wednesday 12:24 pm
33939 spacer

1386587026212.jpg
339393393933939
>>33937

I forgot to include a picture. These two are rather lovely
>> No. 33940 Anonymous
28th May 2014
Wednesday 2:23 pm
33940 spacer
>>33939

Lefty's a disaster.
>> No. 33941 Anonymous
28th May 2014
Wednesday 5:35 pm
33941 spacer
>>33940
De gustibus...
>> No. 33942 Anonymous
29th May 2014
Thursday 12:15 pm
33942 spacer
Dear god this thread is horrifying.
>> No. 33946 Anonymous
31st May 2014
Saturday 7:18 pm
33946 spacer
>>33915

How many calories would someone have to eat every day to maintain that size?

A couple of the girls with whom I work say they have been on diets for close to 2 years but are only slightly thinner than that bird.
>> No. 33948 Anonymous
31st May 2014
Saturday 7:27 pm
33948 spacer
>>33946
If they don't do any exercise then it wouldn't take much. Fat people tend to avoid any physical exertion, even forgoing the stairs if there is a lift available.
>> No. 33949 Anonymous
31st May 2014
Saturday 7:30 pm
33949 spacer
>>33948

So only about 3,000 calories maybe?
>> No. 33953 Anonymous
1st June 2014
Sunday 1:30 am
33953 spacer
>>33949

No, they only need to eat that much until they become fat and then afterwards can reduce and balance it by eating the same amount of calories as they expend.
>> No. 33954 Anonymous
1st June 2014
Sunday 1:44 am
33954 spacer
>>33953

Fat people have a higher metabolic rate than thin people, even at rest - it takes a lot of energy to keep your body fat warm and oxygenated.

To give some example figures, a sedentary woman of eight stone needs about 1600 calories to sustain her basic needs, while an eighteen stone woman needs about 2400.
>> No. 33955 Anonymous
1st June 2014
Sunday 7:20 am
33955 spacer
>>33953

Thanks for this.

So dieting isn't really an answer, you need to exercise to lose the extra weight?
>> No. 33956 Anonymous
1st June 2014
Sunday 7:45 am
33956 spacer
>>33953
If I'm understanding this correctly, that's totally wrong. As >>33954 says, maintaining weight takes energy. It's not as if fat people just go through a weird phase of eating loads, then eat the same amount of calories as everyone else, so they don't get fatter or thinner. You need to eat a lot more to maintain a larger body.

>>33955
>So dieting isn't really an answer, you need to exercise to lose the extra weight?
Not necessarily, but that certainly makes it easier. The way you lose weight is by using more energy than you take in. To lose weight, you can reduce the amount of calories you take in (dieting) and/or increase the amount you expend.

Short of surgery, that is the only way to lose weight, no matter how many books are written on the subject.
>> No. 33957 Anonymous
1st June 2014
Sunday 11:36 am
33957 spacer
Number*****
>> No. 33958 Anonymous
1st June 2014
Sunday 2:53 pm
33958 spacer

1389464190796.jpg
339583395833958

>> No. 33963 Anonymous
2nd June 2014
Monday 1:12 am
33963 spacer
>>33958

That's an okay weight, you could probably sex it off, especially in this humid weather.
>> No. 33964 Anonymous
2nd June 2014
Monday 11:39 am
33964 spacer

tumblr_m2lfh7mTHQ1qgjwx8o1_500.jpg
339643396433964

>> No. 33965 Anonymous
2nd June 2014
Monday 12:00 pm
33965 spacer
>>33954
>>33956

So what you're saying is that "they can balance it by eating the same amount of calories as they expend" is wrong because they expend more calories than thin people do and thus have to eat more to eat the same amount of calories as they expend?
>> No. 33966 Anonymous
2nd June 2014
Monday 12:15 pm
33966 spacer
>>33965
Number* of calories. Please.
>> No. 33967 Anonymous
2nd June 2014
Monday 1:19 pm
33967 spacer
>>33966

Amount: Noun: a quantity of something, especially the total of a thing or things in number, size, value, or extent.
>> No. 33968 Anonymous
2nd June 2014
Monday 1:32 pm
33968 spacer
>>33967
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/grammar/learnit/learnitv129.shtml
>> No. 33969 Anonymous
2nd June 2014
Monday 1:33 pm
33969 spacer
>>33967

It isn't scientific to say amount, amount is not quantitive no matter how much you quote the dictionary.

At Uni, around half my class dropped marks on tests by writing amount. The lecturers hate it, it doesn't mean anything. You have to be clear. Amount doesn't tell you much other than there is stuff there, you need to use words like number or volume or temperature.

Christ, they are even prescriptive about this shit in Secondary School. You obviously never took a STEM subject.
>> No. 33970 Anonymous
2nd June 2014
Monday 1:35 pm
33970 spacer
>>33968

In which case since I'm using "calories" in an general fashion rather than to designate any particular number of calories, then "amount" is fine because the way I used "calories" means that it is uncountable.
>> No. 33971 Anonymous
2nd June 2014
Monday 2:29 pm
33971 spacer
>>33970
Keep digging, mate.
>> No. 33972 Anonymous
2nd June 2014
Monday 2:34 pm
33972 spacer
>>33969
Amount is scientific but it refers specifically to the discrete number of things present, usually measured in molar quantities for practicality.

Whilst energy is technically quantised similarly, at a macroscopic level it is taken as a continuum so you talking about a discrete 'amount' of calories is a silly thing. Even saying 'number' is a bit dodgy, you're better off just saying that the energy content is x calories/kjoules.
>> No. 33973 Anonymous
2nd June 2014
Monday 3:24 pm
33973 spacer
Aren't we all awfully pendantic?
>> No. 41078 Anonymous
17th May 2020
Sunday 5:56 pm
41078 spacer

1588991770499.jpg
410784107841078
About time we ressurected this thread - what's it been, only 6 years?
>> No. 41079 Anonymous
17th May 2020
Sunday 5:59 pm
41079 spacer

1589642722726.jpg
410794107941079
This one might be boardering on the gilf side whatever. Seeing a big arse and thighs like this, bent over as if presenting themselves, really turn me on. I just wanna press into it. Shame I've got such a small member else I might actually beable to have a worthwhile go of it.
>> No. 41080 Anonymous
17th May 2020
Sunday 6:11 pm
41080 spacer

28493090-8327945-The_father_of_three_has_two_grown.jpg
410804108041080
kind of would Jonathan Ross' daughter. Almost posted this in the guilty would thread instead.
>> No. 41081 Anonymous
17th May 2020
Sunday 6:14 pm
41081 spacer
>>41079

>Shame I've got such a small member else I might actually beable to have a worthwhile go of it.

Impersonating a mod is a serious offense.
>> No. 41082 Anonymous
17th May 2020
Sunday 6:15 pm
41082 spacer
>>41080
Small breasts, wide hips. The holy grail!
>> No. 41083 Anonymous
17th May 2020
Sunday 6:42 pm
41083 spacer

076sadie_all.jpg
410834108341083
This lass is absolute perfection.
>> No. 41084 Anonymous
17th May 2020
Sunday 7:17 pm
41084 spacer

diana_eisley.jpg
410844108441084

>> No. 41089 Anonymous
18th May 2020
Monday 4:23 pm
41089 spacer

1588341335633.jpg
410894108941089

>> No. 41093 Anonymous
18th May 2020
Monday 9:15 pm
41093 spacer

1589812122743.jpg
410934109341093
There seems to be a fair crossover with the milf catagory.
>> No. 41094 Anonymous
18th May 2020
Monday 9:35 pm
41094 spacer
>>41093

Ooft, you can tell she's a a right goer.
>> No. 41095 Anonymous
18th May 2020
Monday 10:12 pm
41095 spacer
>>41089
See that's absolutely fine. Whereas >>41083 is so totally not.
>> No. 41096 Anonymous
18th May 2020
Monday 10:31 pm
41096 spacer

1120452.jpg
410964109641096
>>33915
Sophie Dahl was the original big sexy girl of modern times. The image looks so tame now but at the time, I almost crashed my car twice seeing this on a billboard in London.

Baby needs back. My other sibling definitely agrees with me.
>> No. 41097 Anonymous
18th May 2020
Monday 10:34 pm
41097 spacer
>>41096
You've gotta be kidding, she's a rake!
>> No. 41098 Anonymous
18th May 2020
Monday 10:39 pm
41098 spacer
>>41096

You can see her ribs m8.
>> No. 41099 Anonymous
18th May 2020
Monday 10:51 pm
41099 spacer

57f5eefd5c165.jpg
410994109941099
Stephanie Ferrario is considered a plus sized model and she's not that big. Apparently being a size 10-12 is huge for a model.
>> No. 41114 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 12:43 pm
41114 spacer

11 (2).jpg
411144111441114

>> No. 41115 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 12:45 pm
41115 spacer
[-]
>> No. 41120 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 5:35 pm
41120 spacer

pear.jpg
411204112041120
>>41099

It is concealed in that picture but from what I can tell she has a pear figure so most of her weight is in her arse and thighs. if you look a lot of her pictures are the classic myspace angle shots and her tucking in her gut.

I don't think saying plus size is unfounded. She is definitely overweight but holds it well.
>> No. 41121 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 5:39 pm
41121 spacer
>>41120
>>41099
Please post these in a different thread so she can be seen without having to look at the rest.
>> No. 41127 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 7:19 pm
41127 spacer

ayaka_yuzuki_854035078.640x0.jpg
411274112741127

>> No. 41138 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 10:50 pm
41138 spacer

Venus of Willendor.jpg
411384113841138
>>41120
I'd say it's more the classic womanly form. She's not fat, she's fertile. If you survived a plane crash over the Pacific and ended up alone on an island with her she would probably keep looking like that.
>> No. 41139 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 10:50 pm
41139 spacer

buxom_bella.jpg
411394113941139

>> No. 41143 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 11:11 pm
41143 spacer

f2d9def9520c2d2bd6bb9a9b6107647c.jpg
411434114341143

>> No. 41144 Anonymous
20th May 2020
Wednesday 12:01 am
41144 spacer

Troll-Doll.jpg
411444114441144
>>41138
>She's not fat, she's fertile.


She can be both lad don't pretend it is a dichotomy because you don't like the idea that you are into women who are overweight.

Were you the same lad who posted the Venus of Willendor last time claiming it was proof that ancient people liked fat chicks and I pointed out we know really fuck all about its orgin? for all we know it could have been a comically grotesque figurine?
In 30,000 years will you be claiming that troll dolls are proof that people of the 20th century got the horn for ugly chicks?
>> No. 41145 Anonymous
20th May 2020
Wednesday 12:15 am
41145 spacer
>>41144
By your logic anyone with wide hips is overweight. Sounds pretty homo to me.

>Were you the same lad who posted the Venus of Willendor

No. I used it because it emphasises feminine traits like a big arse.
>> No. 41146 Anonymous
20th May 2020
Wednesday 9:25 am
41146 spacer
>>41139

She kind of looks like a chunky Masie Williams, which is something I had no idea I wanted.

Anyone who can deep fake that for me will have my eternal gratitude.
>> No. 41148 Anonymous
20th May 2020
Wednesday 5:14 pm
41148 spacer

Untitled.png
411484114841148
>>41146

As you asked so nicely, I'll give it a whirl. Watch this space.
>> No. 41149 Anonymous
20th May 2020
Wednesday 5:55 pm
41149 spacer

Magnum_ice_cream.jpg
411494114941149
>>41148

You're a legend mate. I brought you a magnum back from the shop.
>> No. 41150 Anonymous
20th May 2020
Wednesday 7:00 pm
41150 spacer
>>41146
She is at the absolute limit of chunk. Any more is fat.
>> No. 41151 Anonymous
21st May 2020
Thursday 6:46 am
41151 spacer
>>41150
>limit of chunk. Any more is fat.

This post is delusional, she is without a doubt medically obese.
>> No. 41152 Anonymous
21st May 2020
Thursday 7:37 am
41152 spacer
>>41151
Please stop engaging with these people.
>> No. 41153 Anonymous
21st May 2020
Thursday 10:12 am
41153 spacer
>>41148
Oh leave her alone.
>> No. 41181 Anonymous
25th May 2020
Monday 7:49 pm
41181 spacer

ohjesusohfuck.png
411814118141181
I'm really not sure who the intended audience of this video is but I thought maybe someone in this thread would appreciate it.
>> No. 41182 Anonymous
25th May 2020
Monday 8:04 pm
41182 spacer
>>41181
The audience is definitely the folk in this thread.
>> No. 41183 Anonymous
25th May 2020
Monday 8:05 pm
41183 spacer

1590405821480.jpg
411834118341183
Absolutely gorgeous. Just imagine her sitting over your lap rolling those hips The colour scheme is nice, too.
>> No. 41184 Anonymous
25th May 2020
Monday 8:19 pm
41184 spacer
>>41183
Her hair looks a bit greasy, but yeah, that is a nice thought.
>> No. 41185 Anonymous
25th May 2020
Monday 8:23 pm
41185 spacer
>>41183

The boobs make up for any other issues.

Is that Agata?
>> No. 41189 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 10:24 am
41189 spacer
>>41181
Christ alive that is terrible.
>> No. 41190 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 1:11 pm
41190 spacer
>>41183
I'd agree, she's nearly perfect, nicely and naturally proportioned.

Why is it then that the fashion industry seem to think that being stick thin is attractive? Does anybody really share that belief other than some weirdo I knew who used to exclusively go out with scratty single mum council estate slags who were built like 12 y/o lasses?
>> No. 41191 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 1:14 pm
41191 spacer
>>41190
The fashion industry is about making clothes look cool, not generating wank fodder.
>> No. 41192 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 1:55 pm
41192 spacer
>>41191
Haven't they understood that sex sells, or are they all made to follow some strict ascetic lifestyle that eliminates all that's fun and sexy?
>> No. 41193 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 2:57 pm
41193 spacer

Scrat sticker.jpg
411934119341193
>>41190
>>41192
>Why is it then that the fashion industry seem to think that being stick thin is attractive?
I think it's more that skinny people are closer to a neutral mannequin than larger. You could create any shaped garment you like around a skinny model, whereas larger bodies would have be considered. There must be plus sized mannequins availale, but it seems like it'ds be more a specialists tool.

>>41190
>scratty
I've got a big nut for her IYKWIM
I'll get my coat
>> No. 41194 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 2:59 pm
41194 spacer
>>41193
>availale
>it'ds
Sorry, I was distracted by that scratty booty.
>> No. 41195 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 4:39 pm
41195 spacer
>>41193

For me, it's crash bandicoot's sister.
>> No. 41196 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 6:38 pm
41196 spacer
>>41190

They do it because healthy people tend to all be the same shape within a small variance, where as fat people are unpredictable in the weird places they are going to bloat. You could design a perfectly shaped outfit for 1 fat model but it would never fit another. where as you can make an outfit that would fit most models of the same propotions.


>>41193

>I think it's more that skinny people are closer to a neutral mannequin than larger.

It is like the mannequis were designed for a different time before the obesity epidemic when being fat wasn't normal.
>> No. 41197 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 6:59 pm
41197 spacer

an.jpg
411974119741197
>>41196

>healthy
>> No. 41198 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 7:55 pm
41198 spacer

Barbie Ferriera.jpg
411984119841198
>>41190
You might as well ask why the bloke mannequins have six-packs and chiselled faces.
Firstly, When you're a good shape you can wear anything and look good - ideal considering they will be modelling multiple different looks and styles.
Secondly, they're not selling reality and reality is not what people want.

The whole revolt we had about mannequins a few years back or was it over 10 years ago was silly. It didn't understand fashion or advertising at all and the concession from the likes of Dove was a cynical ploy to sell feelgood vibes to women with black hair and Jack Skellington tattoos. The 'thicc' models we have now equally don't look like normal people.

>>41192
>Haven't they understood that sex sells

So why do you keep wearing that 'Mr Messy' t-shirt with blue jeans combo? People don't want sexy, they want status. Ask a bird what kind of men's fashion she like and you will get complete bollocks that you'd never wear.

>>41190
Models on the catwalk are specifically selected to display a fashion artists vision and style (not consumer clothing, that stuff is considerably toned down). The preference is for tall and plain-but-unusual women with sharp shoulders that will best demonstrate whatever vomit they're wearing.

Cara Delevingne looks fucking weird. Goofy long limbs and no curves but that doesn't distract from the clothing and her eyebrows and charisma draw the eye.
>> No. 41199 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 7:56 pm
41199 spacer
>>41197
So what you are saying is anyone who isn't a land whale is dangererously underweight thanks for clearing that up.
>> No. 41200 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 8:10 pm
41200 spacer
>>41199

We were specifically talking about the fashion industry, poorreadingcomprehensionladm8.
>> No. 41201 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 8:45 pm
41201 spacer
>>41200

It is just strange the way that if I type fashion model into a search engine no one who looks like them comes up... Like maybe you've gone out of your way to find a bunch of anorexics and assemble the into a collage. The clue might be in the title of the file 'An' what could that possibly mean?
>> No. 41202 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 8:51 pm
41202 spacer
>>41201
There was a lot of stuff in the mainstream media, probably 5-15 years ago, about how fashion models were dangerously thin. I remember constantly reading stuff about size zero models being linked to anorexia in young women. Nowadays it's less of a problem due to body positivity but there was a time it was a major issue.
>> No. 41203 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 9:42 pm
41203 spacer
>>41202

No now we have obesity as the leading cause of death in the country that is a much better arangement than a handful of people being too thin.
>> No. 41204 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 9:58 pm
41204 spacer
>>41199>>41201>>41203
This is like going to a forum for discussing motorsports and complaining about fossil fuels. Shut the fuck up, for your own sake.
>> No. 41206 Anonymous
27th May 2020
Wednesday 10:05 am
41206 spacer
>>41204
>This is like going to a forum for discussing motorsports and complaining about fossil fuels.


I don't recall Britfa.gs being your HAES safespace.
>> No. 41216 Anonymous
5th June 2020
Friday 11:26 am
41216 spacer

1591303477953.jpg
412164121641216
Shiney clothes work really well on big women. I guess there's more shape to reflect light.
>> No. 41217 Anonymous
5th June 2020
Friday 11:27 am
41217 spacer

1591301630181.jpg
412174121741217

>> No. 41218 Anonymous
5th June 2020
Friday 12:47 pm
41218 spacer
>>41217
What is this called? When a girl poses by pulling a strand of her hair out to the side? Why do they do this?
>> No. 41219 Anonymous
5th June 2020
Friday 1:33 pm
41219 spacer
>>41218
I think it's just called pulling your hair to one side. Maybe if Otherlad speaks Latin he could give it a scientific name.
>> No. 41220 Anonymous
5th June 2020
Friday 7:23 pm
41220 spacer
>>41218>>41219

I guarantee there'll be a Japanese term for it that will unearth millions of rude drawings.
>> No. 41221 Anonymous
5th June 2020
Friday 7:55 pm
41221 spacer

2A2BTRK.jpg
412214122141221
Priti Patel has a tremendously meaty arse, but she never shows it off.
>> No. 41222 Anonymous
5th June 2020
Friday 8:48 pm
41222 spacer
>>41221

Christ, she's like a gravity victim.
>> No. 41223 Anonymous
6th June 2020
Saturday 4:51 pm
41223 spacer
>>41217
Jesus, sauce? I would love to a eat post shag chinese with her.
>> No. 41225 Anonymous
7th June 2020
Sunday 12:34 am
41225 spacer
[-]
>> No. 41226 Anonymous
7th June 2020
Sunday 12:47 am
41226 spacer
>>41223

Try Rebellion in Manchester, Corporation in Sheffield, Inns of Court in Wakey if you're on a budget.
>> No. 41227 Anonymous
7th June 2020
Sunday 3:42 pm
41227 spacer

1591538715790.png
412274122741227
Another to share post sex chinese food with.
>> No. 41228 Anonymous
7th June 2020
Sunday 3:43 pm
41228 spacer

1591538942066.jpg
412284122841228

>> No. 41229 Anonymous
7th June 2020
Sunday 3:48 pm
41229 spacer

1591538866349.jpg
412294122941229
This is probably the limit of fat attraction for me. She's still got that great shelf like waist you can lay your forarms in; and not too much hanging flesh that the folds will get cheesey. Any more than this would be beyond questionable.
>> No. 41230 Anonymous
7th June 2020
Sunday 4:21 pm
41230 spacer
>>41227
Reiinapop is a modern day fertility icon.
>> No. 41231 Anonymous
8th June 2020
Monday 10:23 am
41231 spacer
[-]
57 posts omitted. First 100 posts shown.

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password