- Files: GIF, JPG, PNG, Maximum:5000 KB, Thumbnails: 600x600 pixels
- Currently 2355 unique user posts. View catalogue
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ First 100 posts ] [ Last 50 posts ]
Posting mode: Reply [First 100 posts][ Reply ]
57 posts omitted. First 100 posts shown.
Expand all images.
|>>|| No. 33915
I have a fetish for them. Not just fat, but big, heavy girls with big knockers. My GF looks a lot like her, I am so lucky to have found a GF that satisfies my fetish!
|>>|| No. 33921
Good for you, lad.
I wouldn't consider myself or anyone else lucky for having an obese bird, but your relationship is at least removing one fatty from the dating pool, and for that I commend you and thank you for your sacrifice.
|>>|| No. 33923
Ever noticed that most chubby chasers are usually skinny white dudes with ponytails?
|>>|| No. 33924
There is a graphic somewhere online about it.
Coefficient being length of ponytail x a variable I can't remember = weight of girlfriend.
|>>|| No. 33932
Not a sacrifice, lad. Try hugging a fat girl, squeezing her G cups while you make sweet love with her. You will never go back, trust me.
Not here. Just imagine Emma Haslam without poledancing.
Not skinny, somewhat overweight. No ponytail and not quite white, more Hispanic than white. In my experience, nearly all chubby chasers are athletic or fat dudes, especially blacks. I've never seen a big girl with a fat dude, only fat men with skinny girls or the contrary.
|>>|| No. 33937
I'm a skinny white guy, but no ponytail. I like the contrast between a girl's fat body and my own. I put it down to the first girl I fucked being a big lass. And there is something amazingly calming about being able to rest your entire head between two massive breasts and blocking out the world (insert some reference to fight club and allegations of homosexuality here). My only complaint is that the vast majority of porn involving huge fat birds has a brother fucking them. Lucky bastards...
|>>|| No. 33946
How many calories would someone have to eat every day to maintain that size?
A couple of the girls with whom I work say they have been on diets for close to 2 years but are only slightly thinner than that bird.
|>>|| No. 33948
If they don't do any exercise then it wouldn't take much. Fat people tend to avoid any physical exertion, even forgoing the stairs if there is a lift available.
|>>|| No. 33953
No, they only need to eat that much until they become fat and then afterwards can reduce and balance it by eating the same amount of calories as they expend.
|>>|| No. 33954
Fat people have a higher metabolic rate than thin people, even at rest - it takes a lot of energy to keep your body fat warm and oxygenated.
To give some example figures, a sedentary woman of eight stone needs about 1600 calories to sustain her basic needs, while an eighteen stone woman needs about 2400.
|>>|| No. 33955
Thanks for this.
So dieting isn't really an answer, you need to exercise to lose the extra weight?
|>>|| No. 33956
If I'm understanding this correctly, that's totally wrong. As >>33954 says, maintaining weight takes energy. It's not as if fat people just go through a weird phase of eating loads, then eat the same amount of calories as everyone else, so they don't get fatter or thinner. You need to eat a lot more to maintain a larger body.
>So dieting isn't really an answer, you need to exercise to lose the extra weight?
Not necessarily, but that certainly makes it easier. The way you lose weight is by using more energy than you take in. To lose weight, you can reduce the amount of calories you take in (dieting) and/or increase the amount you expend.
Short of surgery, that is the only way to lose weight, no matter how many books are written on the subject.
|>>|| No. 33963
That's an okay weight, you could probably sex it off, especially in this humid weather.
|>>|| No. 33965
So what you're saying is that "they can balance it by eating the same amount of calories as they expend" is wrong because they expend more calories than thin people do and thus have to eat more to eat the same amount of calories as they expend?
|>>|| No. 33967
Amount: Noun: a quantity of something, especially the total of a thing or things in number, size, value, or extent.
|>>|| No. 33969
It isn't scientific to say amount, amount is not quantitive no matter how much you quote the dictionary.
At Uni, around half my class dropped marks on tests by writing amount. The lecturers hate it, it doesn't mean anything. You have to be clear. Amount doesn't tell you much other than there is stuff there, you need to use words like number or volume or temperature.
Christ, they are even prescriptive about this shit in Secondary School. You obviously never took a STEM subject.
|>>|| No. 33970
In which case since I'm using "calories" in an general fashion rather than to designate any particular number of calories, then "amount" is fine because the way I used "calories" means that it is uncountable.
|>>|| No. 33972
Amount is scientific but it refers specifically to the discrete number of things present, usually measured in molar quantities for practicality.
Whilst energy is technically quantised similarly, at a macroscopic level it is taken as a continuum so you talking about a discrete 'amount' of calories is a silly thing. Even saying 'number' is a bit dodgy, you're better off just saying that the energy content is x calories/kjoules.
|>>|| No. 41079
This one might be boardering on the gilf side whatever. Seeing a big arse and thighs like this, bent over as if presenting themselves, really turn me on. I just wanna press into it. Shame I've got such a small member else I might actually beable to have a worthwhile go of it.
|>>|| No. 41081
>Shame I've got such a small member else I might actually beable to have a worthwhile go of it.
Impersonating a mod is a serious offense.
|>>|| No. 41096
Sophie Dahl was the original big sexy girl of modern times. The image looks so tame now but at the time, I almost crashed my car twice seeing this on a billboard in London.
Baby needs back. My other sibling definitely agrees with me.
|>>|| No. 41099
Stephanie Ferrario is considered a plus sized model and she's not that big. Apparently being a size 10-12 is huge for a model.
|>>|| No. 41120
It is concealed in that picture but from what I can tell she has a pear figure so most of her weight is in her arse and thighs. if you look a lot of her pictures are the classic myspace angle shots and her tucking in her gut.
I don't think saying plus size is unfounded. She is definitely overweight but holds it well.
|>>|| No. 41138
Venus of Willendor.jpg
I'd say it's more the classic womanly form. She's not fat, she's fertile. If you survived a plane crash over the Pacific and ended up alone on an island with her she would probably keep looking like that.
|>>|| No. 41144
>She's not fat, she's fertile.
She can be both lad don't pretend it is a dichotomy because you don't like the idea that you are into women who are overweight.
Were you the same lad who posted the Venus of Willendor last time claiming it was proof that ancient people liked fat chicks and I pointed out we know really fuck all about its orgin? for all we know it could have been a comically grotesque figurine?
In 30,000 years will you be claiming that troll dolls are proof that people of the 20th century got the horn for ugly chicks?
|>>|| No. 41145
By your logic anyone with wide hips is overweight. Sounds pretty homo to me.
>Were you the same lad who posted the Venus of Willendor
No. I used it because it emphasises feminine traits like a big arse.
|>>|| No. 41146
She kind of looks like a chunky Masie Williams, which is something I had no idea I wanted.
Anyone who can deep fake that for me will have my eternal gratitude.
|>>|| No. 41151
>limit of chunk. Any more is fat.
This post is delusional, she is without a doubt medically obese.
|>>|| No. 41181
I'm really not sure who the intended audience of this video is but I thought maybe someone in this thread would appreciate it.
|>>|| No. 41190
I'd agree, she's nearly perfect, nicely and naturally proportioned.
Why is it then that the fashion industry seem to think that being stick thin is attractive? Does anybody really share that belief other than some weirdo I knew who used to exclusively go out with scratty single mum council estate slags who were built like 12 y/o lasses?
|>>|| No. 41191
The fashion industry is about making clothes look cool, not generating wank fodder.
|>>|| No. 41192
Haven't they understood that sex sells, or are they all made to follow some strict ascetic lifestyle that eliminates all that's fun and sexy?
|>>|| No. 41193
>Why is it then that the fashion industry seem to think that being stick thin is attractive?
I think it's more that skinny people are closer to a neutral mannequin than larger. You could create any shaped garment you like around a skinny model, whereas larger bodies would have be considered. There must be plus sized mannequins availale, but it seems like it'ds be more a specialists tool.
I've got a big nut for her IYKWIM
I'll get my coat
|>>|| No. 41196
They do it because healthy people tend to all be the same shape within a small variance, where as fat people are unpredictable in the weird places they are going to bloat. You could design a perfectly shaped outfit for 1 fat model but it would never fit another. where as you can make an outfit that would fit most models of the same propotions.
>I think it's more that skinny people are closer to a neutral mannequin than larger.
It is like the mannequis were designed for a different time before the obesity epidemic when being fat wasn't normal.
|>>|| No. 41198
You might as well ask why the bloke mannequins have six-packs and chiselled faces.
Firstly, When you're a good shape you can wear anything and look good - ideal considering they will be modelling multiple different looks and styles.
Secondly, they're not selling reality and reality is not what people want.
The whole revolt we had about mannequins a few years back or was it over 10 years ago was silly. It didn't understand fashion or advertising at all and the concession from the likes of Dove was a cynical ploy to sell feelgood vibes to women with black hair and Jack Skellington tattoos. The 'thicc' models we have now equally don't look like normal people.
>Haven't they understood that sex sells
So why do you keep wearing that 'Mr Messy' t-shirt with blue jeans combo? People don't want sexy, they want status. Ask a bird what kind of men's fashion she like and you will get complete bollocks that you'd never wear.
Models on the catwalk are specifically selected to display a fashion artists vision and style (not consumer clothing, that stuff is considerably toned down). The preference is for tall and plain-but-unusual women with sharp shoulders that will best demonstrate whatever vomit they're wearing.
Cara Delevingne looks fucking weird. Goofy long limbs and no curves but that doesn't distract from the clothing and her eyebrows and charisma draw the eye.
|>>|| No. 41199
So what you are saying is anyone who isn't a land whale is dangererously underweight thanks for clearing that up.
|>>|| No. 41200
We were specifically talking about the fashion industry, poorreadingcomprehensionladm8.
|>>|| No. 41201
It is just strange the way that if I type fashion model into a search engine no one who looks like them comes up... Like maybe you've gone out of your way to find a bunch of anorexics and assemble the into a collage. The clue might be in the title of the file 'An' what could that possibly mean?
|>>|| No. 41202
There was a lot of stuff in the mainstream media, probably 5-15 years ago, about how fashion models were dangerously thin. I remember constantly reading stuff about size zero models being linked to anorexia in young women. Nowadays it's less of a problem due to body positivity but there was a time it was a major issue.
|>>|| No. 41203
No now we have obesity as the leading cause of death in the country that is a much better arangement than a handful of people being too thin.
|>>|| No. 41204
This is like going to a forum for discussing motorsports and complaining about fossil fuels. Shut the fuck up, for your own sake.
|>>|| No. 41206
>This is like going to a forum for discussing motorsports and complaining about fossil fuels.
I don't recall Britfa.gs being your HAES safespace.
|>>|| No. 41218
What is this called? When a girl poses by pulling a strand of her hair out to the side? Why do they do this?
|>>|| No. 41219
I think it's just called pulling your hair to one side. Maybe if Otherlad speaks Latin he could give it a scientific name.
|>>|| No. 41226
Try Rebellion in Manchester, Corporation in Sheffield, Inns of Court in Wakey if you're on a budget.
|>>|| No. 41229
This is probably the limit of fat attraction for me. She's still got that great shelf like waist you can lay your forarms in; and not too much hanging flesh that the folds will get cheesey. Any more than this would be beyond questionable.
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ First 100 posts ] [ Last 50 posts ]