>>34072

Maroon.jpg

Sorry, couldn't resist.

There's something a bit "Crash" about that sketch.

>>34071
>>34072
What the hell is their problem?

>>34076

Birds innit. They probably just need a good dicking.

>>34076
Birds innit. They probably just need a good arse-pissing.

>>34076 Birds innit. They probably just need a good tit spaffing.

>>34083
Hah! I slept with one of them.

>>34088

Well, which one?

>>34089
Abbie "Mac".

>>34091
Detailed account of what she did/where you put it/marks out of ten etc please.

>>34092
It was mostly unremarkable. The TV was on, we'd been watching Peep Show. It was my first time so I didn't know what to do, she just sat me on her sofa and rode me until I needed to piss.
I found these pictures in an email archive.

>>34093
Revenge porn is illegal.

>>34094
Not porn though, is it?

>>34094

Not yet.

>>34094
My ex falsely accused me of posting 'revenge porn' of her. It turned out that a) the photos were publically available already and b) somebody else (bit of a creep from what I hear) admitted to posting them on a porn site. So aside from the false acc it wasn't too bad but I can imagine this sort of thing getting wayy out of proportion in other cases where evidence is less clear.

I mean who's to say that a mate wouldn't find it hilarious to copy photos off your computer or for them to be stolen by malware? It just seems like the sort of thing that's very easy to accuse someone and blacken their reputation when they've done nothing wrong.

>>34097
She's wearing clothes in all those images, I wouldn't have posted nude ones. She's wearing far less in any of the public images. Rather than deal with the hassle, just google for Abbie Mac, Front. There's plenty.

>>34097
> or for them to be stolen by malware?
I've got a few home vids where I put in an absolutely cracking performance, and I've considered using this excuse to release them.

>>34095
Could be. So, illegal.

>>34100
Calm down there Cpt. Buzzkill.

>>34096
It's still not a very nice thing to do. I hope all of your past partners are aware of your complete lack of respect for their privacy.

>>34102 I'm guessing all of your past partners are aware of your complete lack of fun.

>>34103
Not him, but I don't see how not respecting your previous partners privacy and all is fun. Have you asked them if it's fun?

>>34104
One man's "chucking puppies into a pond for a jolly Saturday afternoon" is another man's "horrified letter to PETA". You either share someone's stance on the appropriate treatment of others or you don't; I wouldn't bother arguing with him as he clearly doesn't care or agree that it's a morally stagnant behaviour.

>>34105
You can't really comment without knowing the situation. If she cheated on him then it would be totally fair.

>>34107
And if she cheats on you with your best friend, then only rape is sufficient punishment. And if she breaks up with you the day after you buy her a present, you have to keep her in a dungeon for the rest of her life.

>>34108
Yes, because becoming the next Josef Fritzl is the only logical next step after posting pictures of your ex's tits online.

>>34128
How could I have taken this long to notice the legs were missing?