Uh oh, someone's going to jail.

Lad...

As much fun as this all is, posting them here wasn't a wise idea just yet.

I'm hoping the leaker will get us the videos soon. Oh and the Michelle Keegan images.

>>34503

The only ones I recognised were Kirsten Dunst and Jennifer Lawrence.

Some of them are pretty well produced, which is weird.

I knew you wouldn't let me down /x/

Kewl, she has an Xbox. I'll remember to bring my controller.

>>34505

Not OP, but why not?

>>34508
Legal issues and that. While J Law's people are trying to scare off people they claim they're going to prosecute anyone that posts them. Which of course means nothing but best stay on the safe side.
>>34506
Nice to see MEW in there. Can't recognise half of them there.

Really disappointed that some of the recognizable names have not been leaked and it's assumed the leaker either pissed off giving us the knowledge that a J Law sextape exists or got rumbled.

Impressive. How did it happen? I know this is /x/ and all, but an explanation as to how and why this happened would be great. Also; why would people save their nude pictures on the cloud service?

>>34510
icloud was hacked (through a basic exploit). That pretty much covers it.

The guy who got them stashed them for what seems a while and of course posted on the otherchan.

>>34511
oh and celebs did delete their images. They forgot icloud seems to keep a history of them.

>>34509

https://www.youtube.com/v/Z7-TTWgiYL4

>>34511
>>34512
Does that mean they are all going to sue Apple? Does anyone know who did the hacking?

JLaw isn't as fat as I thought. I think I seen that "It's Friday" girl on there too.

>>34514

>JLaw isn't as fat as I thought.

IKR, disappointing.

>>34514
It's just some lad on the otherchan. Nothing really known about his identity. He just turned up and posted images. As for apple, they'll likely ignore it and attempt to go after the leaker like the scarjo leaker.

That guy is in fucking prison for that stunt. IIRC it was a pretty big sentence too.

Anyone listen to shitty rock music in the early noughties? Well here are those memories tainted.

>>34517
Whose cock is that?

Ah I see they've taken the gallery down

Good thing I saved it half an hour ago. Please don't arrest me GCHQ lad

>>34517

This is how I know you are posting from an apple device.

When I save .gifs on iPad they don't animate on reposting either.

>>34520

How bloody dare you?!

I don't know why it's not animated, it was just like that when I downloaded it.

>>34517>>34520>>34521
I believe this is one of the fakes that slipped in. There's roughly a dozen fakes in the gallery.

Unf, this guy's hotter than the chick.

Come to think of it, I wish someone would leak some male celebrity nudes. Fassbender's cock I would very much like to see, oh yes.

>>34522

You keep telling yourself that, sk8rboi.

>>34523
I don't know who this is

Kristen Dunst seems cool. Like, I'm not even going to do anything rude while looking at this picture.

>>34524

Annie Leibovitz, obviously. It says so right there.

>>34503
Shit. I was too late. Reposts anywhere? Please? I really want Law.

>>34526

>>34527
The sexy kind of Law.

Makes me wonder what other personal information has been taken from this exploit. Although in fairness, its pretty bleeding obvious that you should expect cloud networks to be subject to breaches.

Here is hoping that some celebrity secrets about Hollywood were saved. I've always had a feeling that the conspiracy theory surrounding 'Eyes Wide Shut' would have allot of truth to it.

>>34505
>I'm hoping the leaker will get us the videos soon. Oh and the Michelle Keegan images.

Well he was demanding bitcoins for the leaks so I guess its down to people getting the money together.

>>34508
After the acting role of a lifetime, she's been busy.

>>34513
>>34517
I don't understand why you would want to have these images saved/sent. Who would Avril Lavigne be looking to show her sucking a cock to?

>>34528

You don't think Purps will be angry when he stops wanking wakes up, do you?

>>34526

I will drip feed you like the inactive fool you are.

>>34530
Jesus. I'll give you 9/10.

>>34531
Thank you uncle Ben. I'll be a good boy, I promise. Just give me more.

>>34533

Okay, just don't talk like that. GCHQlad could well be outside my window as I type this.

>>34530

If anything, this makes me love Karl Urban more.

>>34531
>>34534
Yum.

http://imgur.com/a/dawvL/noscript

>>34509
feverishly awaiting Cat Deeley

A slightly mistaken lady writing in the Guardian has compared the effect of this to child pornography.

It's also a very short article, leading me to believe she's mistaken being first with having the strongest argument.

>>34537
Link's dead already. Was this a re-upload of the previous one, or entirely new shots?

Leaker has been doxxed which I assume means that the fappening is now officially over.

You should have redacted the computer information Tristan!

>>34530
Audible Mirth. Well played.

>>34541
>spoiler
What is this and how would one do it?

Any good ones uploaded of Rhianna?

>>34540
http://imgur.com/a/hOjhu

Enjoy, took me hours to upload on this cancer BT calls broadband.

>>34539

Speaking about that. There seems to be a folder of Maisie Williams in 'The Fappening' download. Isn't she 17?

http://imgur.com/a/JBlMX#318

Few More

Despite proliferating many of the images in this thread, I've had a change of heart and now think I've partaken in quite an unpleasant thing. Many of the images are just couples doing couple stuff, and I can't claim to have had any great sexual thirst quenched by the revelation that the girl who played Jesse's junkie girlfriend has breasts.

I feel a bit of a shit actually.

>>34545
So Justin Bieber also got hacked.

>>34546

If you are stupid enough to take naked photos of yourself, you deserve to have them put on the internet for the world to see.

>>34549
Oh is that how you're justifying it to yourself? Those filthy sluts deserve it for wearing their provocative clothing!

>>34549
Not quite true mon frere.

I've taken many, many photos over the years of both myself and various young ladies in varying states of undress. Also got a good few vids of us fucking.

Difference between me and these idiot celebrities is I actually care about security so don't even enable javascript in my web browser, let alone upload private stuff to someone else's server.

These chumps are idiots for using cloud computing while not really understanding the security (or lack thereof) of it.

So yeah. The only pictures from my own personal "mammory lane" as I like to call it that have ever seen the internet are ones I posted myself, that had all identifying features removed. Basically one pic of us fucking that I covered the faces/genitals up. Nothing else has ever been seen online.

>>34549
Quoth the teenlad who's clearly never been in a relationship. Couples have been taking nudey photos of each other, and painting their muses/mistresses/wives/husbands nude, for hundreds of years. It's a natural aspect of human mating behaviour, the only difference is that since the 1980s the Internet has existed and made filesharing possible. Before that you had to actually go in and nick your mate's mums VHS of her getting pounded by Mr Jones. By your logic, anyone who has ever been recorded nude is an idiot. Elizabeth Siddal might've been a junkie, but she was also - at the end of the day - just a woman with a husband who she loved, and presumably liked banging. That's so common a situation it's banal.

These people aren't stupid. They're just boring humans like the rest of us - had you any actual experience with other people you'd probably understand this.

>>34542 ref reply to >>34541 understood now.

>>34552

No, mate. She wasn't a real junkie, she just played one in Breaking Bad.

>>34550
>filthy sluts
I wouldn't refer to them as that, it's just plain rude.

>>34551
But you have these files on a phone or a laptop. If these things were stolen then the risk of them getting leaked still exists.

>>34552
2/10. Calm down, Jennifer.

>>34555
>But you have these files on a phone or a laptop. If these things were stolen then the risk of them getting leaked still exists.
Wrong. All the files involved are stored on my desktop. For me to lose them, someone would have to break into my house and either steal my computer or copy them off that way.

I don't think there have been many stories of private pictures being leaked that way, have there?

>>34549

If you are stupid enough to take naked photos of yourself, you *should expect no sympathy if they are* put on the internet for the world to see.

>>34509
I only know a few those names. 99% of them are reality show "stars", I'm guessing?

Thing is, celeb sex tapes etc have been leaking on and off for years. It's only the sheer amount of stuff at once that's causing any bother.

It's a shame the leaker got greedy and try to get people buy bitcoins for images.

Now I have to live with the knowledge that there are several sex tapes out there of A-list celebrities and I can't see them.

>>34562

Yeah, usually people who steal photographs of the intimate moments from peoples lives are so generous.

>>34556
When I used to work at a computer and phone repair shop, people used to bring in their computers for repairs, and most of the time there would be nude pictures and sometimes the odd video saved on the HDD. It is weird, knowing people so intimately when they don't know about it. "You filthy bitch, he stuck a carrot up your arse, and now you are here haggling for a fucking cheaper service, maybe I should give you a carrot." The best were the extremely religious people and their tons and tons of porn.

I start having existential crisis and anxiety issues when I see stuff like this. I feel like I am going to die broke, depressed and alone. I want to join the army so that I can die without having to kill myself.

>>34564
When the Snowden leak surfaced, did you nod supportively thinking that's how people in charge of IT systems ought to behave or are you a hypocrite as well as a cunt?

>>34566
I don't understand. You might have me confused with someone else.

>>34567
So you didn't just make a post where you gleefully admitted rifling through people's private data without permission?

>>34564
People who need their computers repaired before a simple google search and prompt fix, deserve their shit to be rifled through.

>>34570
>People who can't securely communicate over a network deserve to have their every packet analysed and stored forever.

>>34565

When yous see naked celebrities you develop on urge to join a punishment battalion and throw yourself on a machine gun nest?

>>34566
Not that guy but having worked in a little IT shop before now it's actually surprisingly hard to avoid invading people's privacy when you're dealing with their half-broken computers. If you're going to backup the important bits out of an old Windows profile you'll end up seeing things, filenames if nothing else.

That said, I never saw any home-made porn as far as I can recall; even if I'd been given to snooping around for nudes I wouldn't have had much opportunity, the work tended to be flat out. I do remember stumbling on some guy's porn stash, ~100GB of it saved in a folder called "porn" on his desktop. Can't really miss that.

The only thing I ever saved from computers in my care was music, which I think is pretty benign as trust issues go. The ones with anything worth listening to were few and far between.

>>34571
Why not? Why don't you go to bed with your front door wide open, mate?

>>34569
Why would I not do it, if I can get away with it?

>>34573
Or maybe suicide-by-cop. I don't know mate.

>>34563
But nobody wins

The leaker is getting caught thus losing the money in the process and we don't get our naughty photos.

>>34575
The house would get cold.

>>34579
In the summer...

only one pic? I need more of this slag lads

(A good day to you Sir!)

>>34538
Meow.

>>34586

See, I just can't find that arousing. It's just a couple being all lovely together, and their dog.

Their sexy, sexy dog...

>>34587

Didn't even notice the dog.

christ that dog looks depressed

>>34590
He's a dog, with a Cat as his master.

>>34586
From what it seems, is that her bra is an improper fit. I'm no expert, but those pressure marks look painful.

>>34592
Or maybe they just had a heavy session of bondage/BDSM.

>>34589
Who even is it?

Oh boy, I just saw the Internet Hate Machine itself flash up on the BBC news channel.

Poor m00t, he just wanted to talk about anime with other English speakers.

>>34595

They called it a "photo sharing website" too. I guess that's a roundabout way of saying imageboard.

>>34595
>>34596

RISQUÉ PHOTOGRAPHS.

STATES OF UNDRESS.

>>34598
Mirth. Mainstream news channels are weird.

>>34601

Well they're hardly going have Rico announce "Kate Upton disproves all 'T and no A' myth with sperm string covered post-shag pics", are they?

I mean, I wish they would, but it's just not going to happen.

Oh dear, this is whole non-story is quite pissing me off.

Several news outlets claim this is a "sex crime", and now the hacker is being hounded by the FBI, this is exactly the sort of shit that the tumblrites love.

Why isn't anyone directing their attention to the services that failed to provide adequate security against this sort of thing? And what kind of inept cunt do you need to be, not to know that the barrier between the internet and public is so thin?

hello cunts,

look: http://www.buzzfeed.com/rachelzarrell/jennifer-lawrence-ariana-grande-picture-leak

That might be my email adress.
So it might mean i was the first to drop the leaks.
Or it might mean im the biggest hacker since hitler.

Fuck you im out.

>>34609
Who cares?

>>34603
Can you explain why this isn't a sex crime?

>>34603
Why do people go out of their way to avoid reading a representative sample of media coverage and then indignantly question why the media is ignoring the angle they're interested in?

My country is banned from /x/

Luckily /*/ lets me expand and reply.

I have such a thing for celebs, I can bash one out to Jennifer Aniston pokies (that I've bashed one out to a million times before) faster than I can to any form of porn, I think it's because my first outings onto the internet were to robbscelebs, I still miss that site. RIP Robb.

>>34611
They're saying anyone that views a sexy image without their consent is equivalent to rape which includes all sex images, not just the celeb leak.

Which is quite mad because on that logic I am now among the worst rapists ever. I've been doing it since 1999 since I was 11. I'm a monster. My god all those people I've killed in video games too. I am the worst person ever.

>>34614

SHOCKER: VILE DEN OF RAPISTS DISCOVERED ON THE INTERNET, PERVY YOUNG MEN BASED IN SHEDS ALL ACROSS THE UK HAVE BEEN RAPING WOMEN SINCE THE AGE OF 11
>Anyone may be a rapist now... We urge anyone with suspicions to come forward to the police anonymously. If your son, brother, husband or father is spending hours in a shed, he could be a rapist.

>>34614
>They're saying anyone that views a sexy image without their consent is equivalent to rape
Sorry, who is saying this? Link please.

Also you haven't answered my original question: why is this not a sex crime?

>>34614
I doubt very many people are saying it's equivalent to rape, but they may well be saying it's wrong to view the pictures and the mere act of viewing them further victimises the people depicted. And it's an argument a great number of people have accepted for a long time when it's applied to child pornography.

>>34614
Oh and one article said (paraphrased) "the users of 4chan can talk about evil things without repercussions". The context of that was not just on the celeb images but just in general (not even malicious threats, just general shitposting). These people are quite mad.

>>34616
Just general twitter and comment nonsense from the general public. There's a few people on a buzzfeed article comparing it to rape. But you know, that's buzzfeed.

I apologise for implying that actual journalists are comparing it to rape. In other news video game journalist threatens people who disagree with his opinion on the gamer gate thing with swatting. I'm not particularly a fan of both journos and people with strong opinions jumping on the bandwagon right now. Sage for that reason as I'm just rambling on something off topic.

>>34616
>why is this not a sex crime?

How can viewing an image of a nude person be a sex crime?

What if these images weren't leaked to the world, and only some neckbeard perv viewed them without the celebs knowing - would it still be a sex crime then? It only seems like one because they are making it to be this heinous thing, that, from their own irresponsibility - should make it seem like a great injustice. Fuck them. Don't put your images in a very compromising place - don't take them at all if needs be, if so, then for fucks sake, store them safely.

>>34617 The difference between this and child pornography is that it's not photos of suffering and anguish. It's a fucked up situation, but not child pornography