>>39700

It'll be fine. It's just like a muscle, the more you use it the better it gets at handling it.

Jesus.

>>39737
I found the first one again too.

>>39737
Can a lass tell me if this hurts or not???

>>39739
I'm not a lass but of course it fucking does.

>>39740
How would you know? It's not like you got a fanny. Unless you used to have a fanny, then my apologies.

>>39741
It's pretty fucking easy to deduce, mate. If a woman told you, say, that she wasn't sure if setting your dick on fire would hurt because she doesn't have a dick, would you not think she was a bit dim?

>>39742
No. She doesn't have a cock, so I would tell her about how painful it would be.

>>39743
You're a bit weird.

>>39744
I thought you were taking the piss, but my brother read both our responses and told me how retarded I sounded. My apologies, although I still don't understand what is wrong with what I said.

>>39745
You know that vaginas are tender and sensitive and you know that toilet brushes are hard and spiky. It's not rocket science, even if you're incapable of empathy.

>>39746
I don't have a fucking fanny. How hard is it to understand?

(A good day to you Sir!)

>>39747
I don't have your skin but I can understand that it hurts you to get stabbed. How hard is that to understand?

>>39748
We both have skin. Sigh.

>>39749
Yes, and we both have genitals. Vaginas have skin that's sensitive like your bellend. How would it feel for you to rub a toilet brush against your bellend? How thick are you?

>>39750
Vaginas and cocks aren't the same lad. Come the fuck on.

>>39751
Oh my lord.

>>39751
Genital areas have a large concentration of nerve endings, making them sensitive. Rubbing something bristled and abrasive against a sensitive organ is painful, regardless of whether the organ in question is a dick or fanny.

I hope this has cleared things up for you.

>>39752
Fuck off you patronising twat.

>>39753
Fine. I researched on wikipedia and it says more or less the same thing you are saying, but I still maintain that you can never know since you don't have a fanny.

>>39754
You don't have the same skin, either. You're not the same person. Fuck me. You know different people have different pain tolerances?

>>39751
Vaginas and arseholes are somewhat similar though, so sticking a toilet brush up your arse might give an approximation of how it would feel.

>>39756
Fannies and arseholes aren't the same lad.

>>39757

They're more similar than vaginas and penises.

>>39758

In shape only. Both the labia and vagina and the penis share a common physiology which the vagina and the anus and rectum don't.

>>39759
Clearly we need to find a woman willing to shove a toilet brush up both her entrances and compare how they feel.

>>39760
No, we have to ask that particular woman because her experience is unique and subjective to her only.

So... Can a lass tell us if it hurts or not?

>>39754
Well, yes, you can never "know" in the Cartesian sense, in the same way that you can't really "know" anything much at all. That doesn't mean you can't reasonably assume certain things, and it doesn't mean you won't look like a pillock when you ask such a ridiculous question.

>>39762
I doubt there are any women left on this website after all the patronising and sexist cunt-offs we've been having lately and the answer is still of course it bloody hurts.

>>39764

>of course

Or does it?

>>39763
Why should I put any stock in your ridiculous assertions? You don't have a fanny, you haven't got the slightest clue as to how painful, or if it even is painful, sticking a toilet brush up a fanny is.

It's is like a white person saying they need affirmative action because they can tell how damaging slavery was to black people.

>>39764
Because as everyone knows the rest of the Internet is a feminist paradise.

>>39767

Don't start that shit, he may be overreacting but this place is definitely different from most places on the net in terms of userbase and in tone and we hold that in esteem.

It's one guy who is being a combination of every /pol/ and /r9k/ stereotype all at the same time, and the reaction of a few different users to that has been to parody it in the hopes he's see the irony, but to no avail.

He gets banned for it, are you implying women are stupid and can't understand that it's one rogue element? Patronising cunt.

>>39766
You are mind-bogglingly thick.

>>39766

>It's is like a white person saying they need affirmative action because they can tell how damaging slavery was to black people.

No it isn't.

Can we start banning nonsensical analogies?

>>39770
Banning nonsensical analogies would be like the average rainfall per annum in Fukushima.

>>39771
Which is apparently 42 inches!

>>39768
I don't see any bans for misogynistic wank.

>>39773

Look harder.

>>39774
Tell me honestly, how productive did you think that response was going to be when you posted it?

(A good day to you Sir!)

>>39775

Productive? Do you mean constructive, petal? It's as productive as you make it.

>>39766
>Why should I put any stock in your ridiculous assertions?
You shouldn't, you should be able to work these things out for yourself. That's my point. I understand, however, that you being an insane person might make this difficult.

>>39777
Let's leave his apparent stupidity aside for a minute. Why do you think repeating yourself is going to help this conversation along?

>>39775

Mods > Gods.

>>39778
I don't, but it's impolite to ignore a direct question.

>>39780
It's impolite to allow someone stupid or someone behaving stupidly to lead you astray into belligerence. You ought to consider us, not just him.

>>39781
You like to debate morons to feel good about yourself?

>>39788
I'm telling him to stop debating morons? What the fuck?

>>38717
>>38720
>>38718
Toyota MR2 AW11. Nice.