>ideally with a full analysis.

Like, psychological or..?

>>39812

I will save us all time. Anyone who fancies her has serious mental issue.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScV5gpDim7I

Dirty.

>>39821

It looks like she was wearing a suit of armour, but forgot to take the neck bit off.

It looks like some kind of anorexia feeding tube, and while that may spur some to further twisted desires it's put me right off.

>>39821
What the bloody hell is around her neck?

Looks like an explosive slave collar from those fallout games.

>>39824

It's a mid range "fashion" slave collar bought either online or from one of those embarrassing fetish markets they used to have in London and Manchester.

This should but a pre-emotive stop to any Laurie femdom fiction appearing on this site.

>>39825
It's been pretty obvious she's sub for some time and only the obtuse would confuse her strident public persona with other more subtle clues in her demeanour. I guess I'm interested to know if her kinks would include personally taboo politics - you know, like how raceplay only appeals to those who are firmly opposed to racism IRL - but sage because it's creepy and stalkerish to talk like this on a public forum however much she likes it.

>>39821

You are an utter cunt. Thanks to your post, I am now in a state of combined rage and arousal. She really is a high level moron of the highest order.

Exhibit A.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt4yNdtrq2A

>>39826

As someone who has more than seen the profile so to speak, I can say that parts of her ethnic heritage comes up in some role plays she fantasised about, but which I doubt she has actually played out, mostly due to being more uptight now than before she became famous.

>>39828
Interesting, thanks. This is making me feel super creepy. If you are making it up it's even worse.

>>39829

I haven't bummer her or jizzed on her face, but I have seen the profile in full and had what we can call an encounter in person. For various reasons, which we can all speculate wildly on, there was no second meeting.

I think you are being over sensitive with the word creepy. It's people like you who have made it almost meaningless. Not saying you are a bad person mind you.

>>39830
I know what you are saying about the word creepy, I'm using it like a teenage girl would. But no other word seems to fit this situation of letching over a semi-celebrity who's written about online misogyny on the /x/ board of a website which is known to have a somewhat sexist streak.

As far as her politics goes, a bit simplistic and she's so damn ambitious and needing to be a public figure that it turns me off. But I've seen and read more cringeworthy and her passion on the Newsnight clip beats the generic professionalism of the obvious nudge unit spook Robert Oxley into a cocked toff's hat.

Having some kinks makes her a more likeable figure to me.

>>39831

Overall does that mean you would piss in her arse or not?

Your last statement is a bit odd as everyone has some kink, unless they are genuinely asexual.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LefCz-bG9bQ

I feel like I'm in group therapy, only there's no counselor and everyone's here with a different mental illness.

>>39832
Concentration camp play, predator/prey, expose me online, all that good stuff - I'd piss in her arse only if she begged for it. I'd like to introduce her to advanced Foucaltian powerplays. We'd play out Deleuze and Guattari schizosex roles while wearing Dolce & Gabbana in a chaotic fusion of mixed messages as Skrewdriver, Crass, Laibach and Atari Teenage Riot blasted from the stereo. Taking five Tory MPs hostage and treating them as torturetoys we'd die in orgasm, as the armed Met's bullets blasted through the window, as we fucked in a crescendo of confusion.

Another collar pic, screenshot from some youtube interview. Sage due to not sure at all about this thread and what we've unleashed.

I'd like to address her daddy issues IYKWIM.

>>39836

I'm not Laurie, but your ideas turn me on. Fancy meeting for a pint and a love and cherishing?

>>39838

She doesn't have daddy issues, she had common sense and reality issues.

You guys do realise she is fully aware of this thread and actually browses .gs because it's a cool haven for all do gooder marxist twats. She wasn't very comfortable about that long post that described her sub desires. This was inevitable with the rising popularity of imageboards, the ones you mock will eventually just turn up because it piques their curiosity.

Don't think this belongs in /x/ anyway, there aren't enough pictures of her out there which you can bosh one off to.

>>39842

I don't really see the problem with her knowing about the thread or even that she probably sees it on /*/ every time it gets bumped if she browses the site.

The nature of anonymous posting is that she is invisible and so is everyone else. If she really wanted to, she could pretend to fancy herself and post some erotic fanfiction to that effect and no one would no.

>>39843
>actually browses .gs because it's a cool haven for all do gooder marxist twats
As a do gooder marxist twat, this is NOT TRUE.

>>39843
>no one would no.

Lad.

>>39842

Yeah she posts here along Charlie Brooker, Mark Kermode, Gordon Brown and you poz boyfriend. Seriously, of all the fantasy posters theories we have had Laurie posting here is the mist far fetched.

>>39846
Christ, the idea, the very idea that someone like Laurie Penny would waste her time on an imageboard. It's like sticking her head in a bee hive, and watching the bees try and decide whether they'd rather die from stinging her or exhaustion from making honey for her.

>>39846
I doubt she posts here but she is absolutely aware of us and saw the previous thread/posts.

>>39848

That is as fictitious as her relief profile. I guess you are imaginaryprofilelad out for his Friday jollies!

>>39845
No means no, chauvinist pig.

>>39850

That is 'male chauvinist pig' you wouldn't want to imply that women are capable of chauvinism would you?

A simple thread looking for wank material turns into an autistic and bitter cunt off. Never change .gs.

She'd look better with long hair.

Every woman looks better with long hair.

>>39853
Heresy.

>>39852

Oh but it has changed. The last three or four years have been terrible.

The older order changeth, yielding place to new. God fulfils himself in many ways. And soon, I suppose, I shall be swept away by some vulgar little tumour.

Oh, my boys, my boys, we're at the end of an age. We live in a land of weather forecasts and breakfasts that set in. Shat on by Tories, shovelled up by Labour.

And here we are, we three, perhaps the last island of beauty in the world.

>>39855
Mate please don't post Stew in /x/. I like the man, but I can't wank to him. I think.

>>39856
*I know.

>>39856

You're just not trying hard enough.

>>39857

I no, surely?

>>39849
It's not fictitious you silly goose, I've spoken to her about it over her public email address.

>>39861
An anonymous imageboard poster claiming to have had an email exchange with a public figure who privately verified an assertion about themselves is probably not sufficient to convince many people that said assertion is not fictitious. Just for future reference.

>>39862
Yes, I suppose it is incredibly far fetched to imagine someone might read and reply to their email. Such a thing would need hard proof.

>>39863
Hm yeah, good point.

I emailed Jeremy Paxman, he told me he fucking loves .gs and is also a bumder.

>>39864

David Cameron got back to me, he said the pig was gagging for it.

>>39863

Post a screen grab then, you soft twat.

>>39866

What would you rather have, a screen grab of the e-mail or a pic of Laurie guzzling cum from three massive cocks? You can't have both!

>>39867

Well we can't have the latter unfortunately.

ello

>>39869

More please.

>>39870

K'inell it's Eddie Hitler

Nice jugs.

>>39872

MSPaint/10

>>39869

Is that someone from here? The shit tattoo looks familiar.

>>39871

I really like this picture.

>>39821
I think I have the same watch as her.

Do you guys not realise /x/ only has 4 pages?

Every single time a thead is made, another precious one is bumped off the backpages. There was a mummy JOI video thread in 2011 that made me spaff trundles that is just not there anymore. And I can't find the fucking video that got me off so much.

Don't make /x/ threads unless they're going to have some pornographic content. This utter abortion of a thread should be deleted really.

>>39878

So you are blaming Laurie for spoiling you wank,then wanklad?

>>39879
VICTIM BLAMING

>>39880

wait is laurie, the victim or the native wankerlad who has had his board appropriated?

>>39881
Laurie is the victim. Wanklad is trying to shut empowered women out of his phallocentric hate space.

This thread is going nowhere interesting and has been given ample time. In future, if you want to discuss the sex lives of minor celebrities do so in /b/ or /iq/.