[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
women

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 42530)
Message
File  []
close
1249704380_DawnGun.jpg
425304253042530
>> No. 42530 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 11:15 pm
42530 By popular furquest
There's at least 3 of us here who want to see this, and we all know what that means.

(A good day to you Sir!)
Expand all images.
>> No. 42531 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 11:16 pm
42531 spacer

1249756948_Sashastandover.jpg
425314253142531

>> No. 42532 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 11:17 pm
42532 spacer

1249875024_Shakti.jpg
425324253242532

>> No. 42533 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 11:18 pm
42533 spacer

1250480016_Miamidesktop.jpg
425334253342533

>> No. 42534 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 11:19 pm
42534 spacer

1249704572_JessicaSpread.jpg
425344253442534

>> No. 42535 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 11:19 pm
42535 spacer

1250452527_SashaandEbon2.jpg
425354253542535

>> No. 42536 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 11:21 pm
42536 spacer

1250007209_DawnPOV4.jpg
425364253642536

>> No. 42537 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 11:23 pm
42537 spacer

1249674547_SashaandRaganzi.jpg
425374253742537

>> No. 42538 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 11:24 pm
42538 spacer

1249674563_Sashachair.jpg
425384253842538

>> No. 42539 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 11:26 pm
42539 spacer

1249874272_Demonchoke.jpg
425394253942539

>> No. 42540 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 11:26 pm
42540 spacer

1249756962_Sashawelcomeback.jpg
425404254042540

>> No. 42541 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 11:33 pm
42541 spacer
Why can't star remember I hid this thread?
>> No. 42542 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 11:34 pm
42542 spacer

haram.jpg
425424254242542

>> No. 42543 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 11:38 pm
42543 spacer

BTWEm9WCIAAzmkt.png
425434254342543
Should we all be furry now? What's the Church's position?
>> No. 42544 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 11:58 pm
42544 spacer
Oh well. Time to start scrolling through /sfw/ instead of /*/.
>> No. 42546 Anonymous
14th January 2022
Friday 9:06 am
42546 spacer
As someone with a mild interest in furfaggotry, this style was never appealing.
>> No. 42547 Anonymous
14th January 2022
Friday 9:49 am
42547 spacer
>>42546
Seems a fairly popular opinion, it's quite basic but I guess I have those spunk-tinted specs on because this was the first stuff I encountered.

I'm curious about furlad and what he's into. I can find some other artists and have a look through to see if I can tempt some of youse others over to the dark side - at least it doesn't feel quite as depressing scrolling through furry porn when your missus is commenting on the ones she finds hot.
>> No. 42548 Anonymous
14th January 2022
Friday 10:06 am
42548 spacer
Between the chubby chasers and the furfags I fear half this board will have married hogs come 2023.
>> No. 42549 Anonymous
14th January 2022
Friday 12:05 pm
42549 spacer
>>42548
I have no objection to vanilla furry stuff. I have a number of objections to the stuff in this thread.

Why is /x/ always so disappointing?
>> No. 42550 Anonymous
14th January 2022
Friday 12:10 pm
42550 spacer
>>42549
I was really hoping someone would provide some more content of better quality. This is simply the stuff I remember wanking to way back when. I think part of the problem is that I don't like furry porn anymore.

I just went on /r/yiff and it seems like mostly the same kind of thing, maybe some softer brushes and less shiny/metallic sheens, but that's about it.

What constitutes 'good' furry porn?
>> No. 42551 Anonymous
14th January 2022
Friday 1:36 pm
42551 spacer
>>42550

Furry porn is just far too diverse nowadays to really have only of these classic 'chan threads about it. I could recommend a few choice selections the average . gs lad might find palatable (the artist Os and their dedication to drawing cute nerdy girls with no bottoms on comes to mind) but I'll not venture as far as posting any.

In more broad strokes though I think a great amount of the appeal to furry porn is that, like hentai, it can portray things which are outright impossible in real life, or harmlessly portray things that are deeply taboo. As for me (The Real Slim Furrylad) my personal tastes involve a couple of very specific kink niches, and it's not so much about the visual quality of the art as it is the exploration of the concept and possibilities of those kinks.

It brings to mind the old received wisdom that men prefer visual stimulation, and women prefer mental stimulation. I'd disagree with that, because I'm firmly in the latter camp and I'm certainly a bloke, but I think that's basically the dynamic at play. It invites more imagination to the porn experience.

(Unless that means I'm actually trans, but I don't think it does. Besides, I don't believe trans people are really the other gender, because they don't believe I'm really a fox either, so fuck 'em.)
>> No. 42552 Anonymous
14th January 2022
Friday 2:21 pm
42552 spacer
>>42551
It's all 60/40 kind of stuff when it comes to 'men/women prefer' as far as I'm concerned. Yes, I like fapping to porn, but also I've not had any sex that didn't involve dirty talk or other varieties of mental stimulation for several years now. I can't imagine a silent shag for example, even if she was stunning. Without a bit of depraved filth it's just not fun.

My lass did let on that she regretted getting the beige version of Rex and would have preferred the realistic, red and purple one, so at least I know I've got someone who's absolute filth willing to engage some messy fantasies.
>> No. 42554 Anonymous
14th January 2022
Friday 5:51 pm
42554 spacer
I don't like the colour scheme. The way it's sort of... metallic, for want of a better word, makes it a bit hard for me to focus at what I'm actually looking at.

This furry stuff is doing nothing for me, mind. Is this supposed to be the tip top of furry porn?
>> No. 42555 Anonymous
14th January 2022
Friday 6:35 pm
42555 spacer

1630202354.foxovh_124_hoofen_150821_web.jpg
425554255542555
>>42554
>Is this supposed to be the tip top of furry porn?
Stuff like that was considered good a long time ago.
Now there's a lot more talented artists doing this type of thing than 10-20 years ago, and the software is much better, and perhaps styles have changed too. Most furry porn now is nothing like that excessively shaded mess that makes them look like buff shiny barbie dolls.

Risking a ban I guess, but here's one - JUST ONE MODS THEN I'LL NEVER POST ANY AGAIN I PROMISE - example of what I would consider a good benchmark for modern furry porn styles.
>> No. 42556 Anonymous
14th January 2022
Friday 6:40 pm
42556 spacer
>>42555


>> No. 42557 Anonymous
14th January 2022
Friday 6:44 pm
42557 spacer
>>42556


>> No. 42564 Anonymous
15th January 2022
Saturday 10:11 pm
42564 spacer
I forgot this artist existed. Such familiar faces and vaginas, lol.
J Nalor comics are pretty good.

>>42549
>I have no objection to vanilla furry stuff.
>I have a number of objections to the stuff in this thread.
When you say vanilla, do you mean softcore? I can see nothing here that's not vanilla furry, apart from some possibly light BDSM (a few chains, a lead, etc)

>>42551
>It brings to mind the old received wisdom that men prefer visual stimulation, and women prefer mental stimulation. I'd disagree with that, because I'm firmly in the latter camp and I'm certainly a bloke, but I think that's basically the dynamic at play.
>(Unless that means I'm actually trans, but I don't think it does)
I call it 'concept porn' more about non-generic scenarios and worldbuilding. For better or worse it's really difficult to find anything worthwhile, although 'horror porn' seems to be a growing genre.
>> No. 42565 Anonymous
16th January 2022
Sunday 12:15 am
42565 spacer
>>42564
>When you say vanilla, do you mean softcore?
Depends what you mean. I just know that nipples that look like plungers, the weird metallic sheen that others have mentioned, the lip-spreading of what looks like a sphincter, the unrealistic amount of fluid everywhere... none of it's a turn-on. Post some fuckin' Peaches and Cream instead or something.
>> No. 42566 Anonymous
16th January 2022
Sunday 12:34 am
42566 spacer

nN7a5s.jpg
425664256642566
>>42565

It's all very Tom of Finland.
>> No. 42584 Anonymous
4th February 2022
Friday 3:55 pm
42584 spacer

w5p8qgv3arf81.jpg
425844258442584
This is the sort of thing I thought furries would be in to.
>> No. 42585 Anonymous
4th February 2022
Friday 4:17 pm
42585 spacer
>>42584

No, when you cross a certain point of realism there's a very definite uncanny valley effect that makes it horrible instead of arousing. If they were to exist in real life, nature would have to take quite a few artistic liberties.

In that particular example the weird mutant stump of a tail kills it. One of the best parts of furries is having a tail to accentuate a nice arse and imagine using as a handle when you plough them but that's an abomination.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password