[ Return ]
>> | No. 1701
1701
Gaylads of britfa.gs, do "femboys" exist in real life, and if so, where does one find them? As far as I'm concerned they're basically unicorns, because in all my many years of megacity living, I've never seen one. I'm starting to think that I should start phasing them out of rotation in my wank bank, because I'll only set myself up for disappointment if I keep getting my rocks off to things that are so rare in reality, that they may as well be imaginary creatures. At least the fursona folk have their costume conventions and what have you. |
>> | No. 1702
1702
>>1701 |
>> | No. 1703
1703
>>1701 |
>> | No. 1704
1704
I'd be a femboy if I could be arsed to shave/wax/veet all my body hair, but who can really be fucked? Shame as well, I'd make a killing camming and such. |
>> | No. 1705
1705
>>1704 |
>> | No. 1706
1706
>>1702 |
>> | No. 1707
1707
Have you tried preop MtFs? |
>> | No. 1708
1708
>>1707 |
>> | No. 1709
1709
>>1708 |
>> | No. 1710
1710
>>1707 |
>> | No. 1711
1711
>>1701 |
>> | No. 1712
1712
Unfff, femboys are my kryptonite... |
>> | No. 1713
1713
Horny springtime bump. |
>> | No. 1714
1714
1643825542099.jpg =/ |
>> | No. 1715
1715
1642531773667.jpg The trouble is that 'femboy' porn, amature at least, so rarely shows full body and face shots. Obvious reason, really, but it's discouraging. |
>> | No. 1716
1716
only the ass.jpg Not to mention the connotation of hairless genitals that seems vastly more apparent in femboy/twink porn than hetero. |
>> | No. 1717
1717
>>1716 |
>> | No. 1718
1718
01.jpg |
>> | No. 1719
1719
02.jpg |
>> | No. 1720
1720
03.jpg |
>> | No. 1721
1721
04.jpg Probably more 'trans' than 'femboy' but who cares. |
>> | No. 1722
1722
05.jpg This character looks so debonair. A streamer, AFIAK, but I've never seen their show - daren't watch infact. |
>> | No. 1723
1723
06.jpg I'm not sure about this one. Almost looks like a face filter or something, but it's interesting none the less. I quite like the idea that fashions can change and that one day males may present themselves more femenine than they do now. Not in terms of sex and sexuality, rather olden times sort of pantallon merry making way. |
>> | No. 1724
1724
>>1717 |
>> | No. 1725
1725
>>1724 |
>> | No. 1726
1726
>>1725 |
>> | No. 1727
1727
>>1726 |
>> | No. 1728
1728
>>1726 |
>> | No. 1729
1729
I thought "men make women shave because they are all secret paedos" was one of those tedious radfem arguments. |
>> | No. 1730
1730
>>1727 |
>> | No. 1731
1731
>>1730 |
>> | No. 1732
1732
>>1730 |
>> | No. 1733
1733
>>1732 |
>> | No. 1734
1734
>>1733 |
>> | No. 1746
1746
Yuzuru Hanyu.jpg >>1713 |
>> | No. 1747
1747
1683917797294639.jpg I think.. |
>> | No. 1748
1748
1683920867121803.jpg I might.. |
>> | No. 1749
1749
1683918809098804.jpg be gay. |
>> | No. 1750
1750
C976AD0.jpg >>1749 |
>> | No. 1751
1751
1688999445780359.jpg |
>> | No. 1752
1752
1689000747024930.jpg I most definitely would. |
[ Return ]
Delete Post [] Password |