I do not endorse money laundering etc etc,
Brexit will perhaps mean regulators and crime fighters have to strain their resources, and tere is a belief that money laundering will increase.
So for my academic research what
Transactions are by most companies trackable through some form of Footpath.
The techniques are ever decreasing and is becoming a thing of the past.
Can i get help with these two assumptions abd insight on anti money laundering,
Please do not endorse or encourage this naughty behac.
>>7510 What the actual fuck are you talking about. Speak English and try not to be so obvious about what you're asking.
All financial firms have responsibilities around AML and KYC. Since PSD2, which took effect last year, the scope of those responsibilities and the kinds of companies which have to report SARs (Suspicious Activity Reports) has greatly increased. Simply put, any deposit or movement of money over a certain amount is reported, and the limit for that has been greatly lowered; you would be surprised how many companies do these kinds of reports - everyone working online, for instance.
There isn't an easy way to launder money - and its getting much harder to do so. It's the laundering part of the crime where people usually get caught nowadays, it's far easier for the police to "follow the money" rather than catch you at a particular crime, and so that's what they focus on.
There is nothing happening in Brexit which will make it easier, or make money laundering more likely. Your assumptions are completely wrong and your request is way too transparent.
Gambling, off market investment stocks and bonds, cryptocurrency, companies that deal in cash, high art, crowdfunding, and as trump has demonstrated hotels.
Really lad not knowing how to launder money just shows a lack of imagination.
firstly its stated that you do not know what is being asked "what the actual f%ck are you talking about", and then you show that you understand the question by confirming its clarity "try not to be so obvious about what you're asking".
if i wasnt on safari in Kenya i would challenge you to a duel my dear chap. Although it would have to be on my private estate and with my duelling pistols as your carers allowance would not provide you an adequate budget to finance your own equipment ( although im sure there are plenty of firearms available in your plebian council estate). I bid you good day you inferior ruffian!
There are almost constantly empty tanning salons, dog grooming parlours etc in my prosperous suburban market town and its surrounding areas run by the daughters or younger lovers of prosperous gentleman involved with white powdery substances on a large scale and have been for many years.
What exactly do you think the risk is here? It doesn't need to be on the market for very long and it doesn't need to ever be in one lump sum at any of the exchanges. You can explain away any jackpot amount as I bought some bitcoins once on a punt 10 years ago and I've started cashing in.
>>7523 Nail bars, taxi firms, kebab shops, there are a number of cash based businesses. Second hand cars certainly. But in the UK the opportunities for laundering money are dwindling as we reduce our reliance on cash.
>>7524 The value might get wiped out in a bart, the exchange you buy from is probably shady as shit if they're not doing KYC checks and are liable to just run off with the cash and your crypto before you can shift them, and the exchange you cash out from might suddenly develop "technical difficulties". Then there's the minor point that the blockchain being entirely open means that even if you do manage to cash out your explanation won't hold water.
>>7707 That might get a bit confused after the actually WWIII begins. And, even if it happens decades from now, many of the threads currently on the front page of /*/ will still be here.
