|>>|| No. 434933
Sort of, maybe. Probably not. Naomi Seibt was probably chosen as the front of the anti-alarmism movement because she looks similar to Greta Thunberg while being more attractive. A lot of people make assumptions and process feelings based on appearance. Both girls have similar things going on, small frames, elongated necks compared to average, narrow facial features compared to average, rounder cheeks compared to average, and while both have average noses both of their noses are about the same. Choosing a frontman who looks similar to the opposing frontman ensures that the speakers are judged by the public on the content, quality and marketing of their message rather than appearance. As a loose example see the Nixon/Kennedy debates in which Nixon received better reception than Kennedy among radio listeners but the reverse was true among TV viewers. The commonly accepted reason for this is not simply demographic differences between radio and TV audiences, I assume they accounted for that, it is that Nixon had sweat on his lip on the TV and looked like a liar. Now that we've headed off any debate on whether appearance is relevant to how the public or most individuals receive a message let's move on to the carpet-bagger aspect.
I don't believe Greta was chosen as the frontman of the alarmism movement for directly carpet-baggery reasons, rather I believe it's a more insidious carpet-bagger-like plot to "empower" young adults across the world. Teenagers are notoriously stupid, especially in groups and therefore easy to manipulate. Over the last few decades the worth of a teenager's opinion in politics has gone from "aww ain't that cute" to "this teenager's opinion on this issue is as important as this 50 year old's opinion who has worked in the relevant industry all his life." The age of having your opinion taken seriously has dropped and dropped and dropped, when Greta came to the stage at 15 we were beginning to treat 18 year olds as well educated, well read, well travelled men with good ideas, I vaguely remember something about Scotland wanting to let 16 year olds vote back in Indyref too, or was it the general elections as well? Greta's arrival and subsequent actions focused on making middle teenagers a viable political force, you'll notice that they and Greta aren't actually tasked with thinking though, because the teenagers would quickly loose interest when they realised they lacked knowledge and had no idea what to actually do, instead Greta and these teenagers demand that someone do something. I actually remember one video in which Greta says "we are not here to provide solutions we are here to demand solutions" but I can't find it now so I'm probably lying. The sheer power of this movement, the ability to make middle teenagers strike and demand that someone do something to change an issue is one that should not be underestimated. There's virtually no dropoff from the group as none of the teenagers can be challenged from outside, they're not actually saying anything other than such and such situation must be changed and that position is right now one that can't really be argued against. I'm sure the issue of the day will be similarly unimpeachable in the future too. These middle teenagers aren't actually challenged themselves, in fact they love the anarchy, it's a day off school to be in the sun with friends, and there's no authority figure saying "stop being a little shit and get back in school," in fact, all the authority figures are praising you. I'm not able to say there's definitely no sexual carpet-bagger agenda going on, the machinations of the people who think they rule the world are a mystery to me, what I am able to say is we're definitely mindfucking our kids and no good will come of it.