[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
random

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply [First 100 posts]
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 448954)
Message
File  []
close
Happy-Hump-Day-Card.jpg
448954448954448954
>> No. 448954 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 11:40 am
448954 spacer
New weekday thread: hump day edition.
Expand all images.
>> No. 448955 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 12:14 pm
448955 spacer
I had a lot of peppers on my pizza last night and my guts are a wreck this morning.

This is possibly my least favourite thing about the human body, out of a long list of other complaints. I really like peppers, they're one of the very few fruits/vegetables I actively like, rather than just tolerating them because I know I have to. But every time I eat any appreciable quantity of them I'm doubled over with stomach cramps. It's not even the spicy kind, I'd understand if it was a big pile of habalenos or japadeneros or whatever, but it's just your normal every day bell peppers.

What's the deal, does anyone know why this happens and if I can do anything about it?
>> No. 448956 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 12:28 pm
448956 spacer
I've intentionally shoplifted for the first time in about 18 years. It was just a small ~£10 electronics item but I knew the security barriers at my local supermarket don't work so I was able to simply walk out with it in my trolley. I don't think I'll do it again, I didn't get a cheap thrill out of it or anything.

>>448955
Could be an allergy or intolerance.
>> No. 448957 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 1:20 pm
448957 spacer
>>448955
You might be allergic to capsicum - it's quite common.
>> No. 448958 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 2:14 pm
448958 spacer
>>448955
If that's the only fruit you ever eat, perhaps you are not aware that all fruit has the power to make you shit quite amazingly. Fruit-eaters might not notice, but I have occasionally eaten a big load of peppers, like you say you've done, and I certainly shat more purposefully afterwards. But it was quite a minor thing; if you're genuinely unwell then you might have something else going on.

>>448956
If only the self-service tills were open, then you're doing God's work and I applaud you. But yeah; it doesn't feel like the heroic victory for justice that it clearly is.
>> No. 448959 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 2:24 pm
448959 spacer
>>448958
I've noticed it I eat three clementines in a day they'll go right through me.
>> No. 448960 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 2:27 pm
448960 spacer
>>448958

I prefer juice to whole fruit, but I've noticed grape juice is potent stuff. They should put a warning on the bottle, because if you have more than a couple of glasses you're in trouble.
>> No. 448961 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 2:47 pm
448961 spacer
>>448958
It was my local Lidl and I did use the proper checkouts, although the self serve ones were a lot busier. It was easy enough to hide it in my trolley and then bury it under the shopping as it came through.

Thinking about it, when I go to proper supermarkets I regularly underweigh fruit and veg on the scales.
>> No. 448964 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 3:21 pm
448964 spacer
>>448961

I must have had at least fifty quid's worth of bags for life by now. I just press the "I brought my own bags" button and put them on the counter.

It's not much, but even the biggest landslide starts with only a few grains of dirt. That's Confucius or someone, innit.
>> No. 448965 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 4:12 pm
448965 spacer
I bought a massive wooden chest from 1870.
>> No. 448966 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 4:29 pm
448966 spacer

Alicia Kearns Melton[1].jpg
448966448966448966
PMQs was a fun watch. The reaction to the guy switching the topic to washing machines, wonderful. Also I discovered this hottie politician I didn't know existed until today.
>> No. 448967 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 4:33 pm
448967 spacer

Rutland.jpg
448967448967448967
>>448966
Be honest, lad. Was it the chin what did it for you?
>> No. 448968 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 4:35 pm
448968 spacer
>>448967
Good strong chin, busty, robust. Ideal woman.
>> No. 448969 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 4:42 pm
448969 spacer

81zJJAnVtDL.jpg
448969448969448969
>>448967
She has a face like a commedia mask.
>> No. 448970 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 5:10 pm
448970 spacer

2.png
448970448970448970
I really do have a thing for fat girls now. I dated, briefly, a chubster, and now on a night out I find myself checking out girls bellys in their tight dresses.

I feel disgusted at this sexual development, but also excited at the size, scale, breadth of opportunities.

How easy can I get one to dress up as a cowgirl?
>> No. 448971 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 5:37 pm
448971 spacer
>>448966

She looks like the sort of lass who I'd get into political arguments with at uni, and end up shagging despite us both believing quite genuinely the other was ruining the country.

Tory, I assume.
>> No. 448972 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 5:39 pm
448972 spacer
Lads, what's a good "opener" on hinge/bumble/tinder etc when they don't have much in their profile and their pics are reasonably generic?

The girl is quite cute and we've matched, she has lots of outdoorsy stuff and a cool looking dog in her pics. Her "answers" to the prompt questions (it's on hinge) are just about having friends and a dog. I feel like I used to be quite good at the dating app chat having spent so much of my life online but the past 2 years has turned my brain to jelly and I struggle for witty and amusing openings.

Also I'm aware of the ostrich technique.
>> No. 448973 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 5:40 pm
448973 spacer
I've just been into Co-op and their own brand pasta is now 95p a pack. It was only c. 55p a year or so ago.

>>448970
>How easy can I get one to dress up as a cowgirl?

Quite easily.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJAK7GLrs9A
>> No. 448974 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 5:45 pm
448974 spacer
>>448973
I think he probably means anthropomorphic bovine type cowgirl, rather than wild west style cowgirl. Probably.
>> No. 448975 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 5:48 pm
448975 spacer

hucow.jpg
448975448975448975
>>448973
I think Chubbychaserlad meant more in the Hucow kind of way.
>> No. 448976 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 5:52 pm
448976 spacer
>>448972

Ask her if she's knotted it yet?
>> No. 448977 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 5:56 pm
448977 spacer
So what's rhe allure of a heifer dressed up as a heifer?
>> No. 448978 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 5:57 pm
448978 spacer
>>448972
>Also I'm aware of the ostrich technique.
Is that archived somewhere? I forgot that was a thing. I recall people mentioning success with it but I cannot for the life of me remember why it's called the Ostrich technique. That were like ten years ago or something now wasn't it?
>> No. 448979 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 6:01 pm
448979 spacer
>>448970

The unstoppable rise of Chub Club continues.

>>448972

Assuming you're looking for a relationship rather than a booty call, I'd suggest something like:

"If you could have dinner with any one person from history, who would it be?"
"If you could have any superpower, what would you choose?"
>> No. 448980 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 6:03 pm
448980 spacer
>>448977

Milking their big milkers. Dehumanising them. Breeding them, there's quite a few elements at play.
>> No. 448981 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 6:08 pm
448981 spacer
Speaking of ten years ago, since when did everyone start harpooning? I've noticed what seems to be a growing trend of stomach-shaggery here lately. Did everyone just lower their standards or is it a genuine preference that you'd have over, say, someone you had a reasonable chance of lifting without crippling yourself?

>>448975
She doesn't count, she's fairly proportional. Though I would have begrudgingly shagged Pierce Brosnan's wife up til a few years back. Not that I'm one of you sick fetishists.
>> No. 448982 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 6:10 pm
448982 spacer
>>448975

I knobbed a chubster this weekend, should have got her to do this. I knew it would be a difficult night when I met her though, she turned out to be a proper munter in terms of facial features (women are honestly fucking scam artists with those filters nowadays) and I'm not sure if even this kind of sordid filth could compensate for it. In the end I just got blackout drunk and gave her a half-hearted knobbing in the morning.

Overall though yeah, you should have no trouble talking one into being whatever kind of cowgirl you want. Chubby lasses are usually pretty filthy, but even despite that I've always been able to get lasses to indulge my kinks when they actually like me. That's really the key to it- If they're genuinely into you, almost anything you want to do gets them going.
>> No. 448983 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 6:14 pm
448983 spacer
>>448977

It's the intersection between a silly dress-up game and something altogether more visceral. A hucow is docile and submissive but also nurturing and nourishing, which creates a unique two-way exchange of power. It's a celebration of all that is dirty and sweaty and milky.
>> No. 448984 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 6:18 pm
448984 spacer
>>448981

a) we're all getting more mature in our tastes
b) men tend to prefer bigger women in times of political and economic uncertainty
c) I've been running a years-long psychological experiment to manipulate your sexual preferences
and
d) bellies are basically a big third tit and everyone likes tits.

You can fight it all you like, but you can't suppress your deep-seated yearning for the warm embrace of squishy flesh.
>> No. 448985 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 6:20 pm
448985 spacer
>>448972

Honestly it's as much about them as it is you, if they've actually got interesting things about themselves to work with, it's not too hard to bring one of them up and engage in a bit of bantz over. So this...

>Her "answers" to the prompt questions (it's on hinge) are just about having friends and a dog.

... Wouldn't give me much hope honestly. Usually I'm not optimistic about that sort of girl. It's always like pulling teeth, even if you get to catch their attention with the opener. They're just the sort of girls who haven't realised dating apps by their very nature require a bit of effort from both sides, not just the bloke wooing them.

I don't wish to be too pessimistic, just be prepared to work a bit to get a conversation going I suppose.
>> No. 448986 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 6:26 pm
448986 spacer
>>448984

I for one have always liked a big lass; but all your third tit talk is just offensive. There's liking fat girls, then there's wrong 'uns like you who are attracted to nothing less than the signifiers of cardiac disease and diabetic foot ulcers waiting to happen.

It's all about a nice big arse is the honest truth. They don't even need two normal tits, never mind a third, as long as they've got a big juicy arse to bury my face in.

I attribute it to the influence of classic rock staples like "Fat Bottom Girls" and "Whole Lotta Rosie". If it was good enough for the hedonistic stage stars of the swinging 70s, it's good enough for me.
>> No. 448987 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 6:42 pm
448987 spacer
>>448985
You're very much correct and tbh usually I'd not even bother if they can't be arsed to show a sliver of personality, but she looks like my type (not a great big fatty for the record) so I'm tempted to make the effort. Plus I've not got my end away in a while out of laziness and apathy

Will probably just use my tried and tested technique of getting a bit pissed and messaging drunken nonsense to see if they bite.
>> No. 448988 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 9:05 pm
448988 spacer
>>448981
I have always preferred squishier ladies. I like soft faces, so that means lots of fat women, and that's the main reason. However, I don't think I should overlook the slightly /emo/ fact that culturally, fat women are meant to be unattractive, and because I spend so much of my life single and lonely, I am confident that I could form a better emotional connection with a woman nobody fancies. What would I say to Beyonce? What do we have in common? Absolutely fuck all. But when I emerge from my cave, caked in my own shit and with insects crawling all over me, I'm sure the way society treats me will be similar to how they treat the sea monster in the lake. So that's something we have in common right away.
>> No. 448989 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 9:08 pm
448989 spacer
>>448970
Look what you've done to this thread.
>> No. 448990 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 9:20 pm
448990 spacer

trussphone1.jpg
448990448990448990
>>448989
It was inevitable. You're all thirsty and it occasionally spills out.
>> No. 448991 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 9:31 pm
448991 spacer
>>448989
We've all played our part. The casual goading, the outright disbelief, the prying and provocation.

If this carries on, I'm going to start shagging fat birds so I can feel included, and all you cowherds will be sorry when you roll up to your local seacow, only to find my manky sperm crusting in her tummy folds.
>> No. 448992 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 10:08 pm
448992 spacer
>>448991
I went on a complete bender with the fanny during my 20s, and I have to say that I still can't see the appeal of the bigguns. It's the stuck-up alt girls for me.

That said, 2/3 of the best blowies I've ever had came from girls on the bigger side.
>> No. 448993 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 10:31 pm
448993 spacer
>>448990
Red shoes, no knickers.

I'm not sure how we're all going to cope when she inevitably becomes the first prime minister we actually fancy (albeit for about five minutes until the next general election).
>> No. 448994 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 11:08 pm
448994 spacer
>>448993
She has a photo of herself on the table. That's just bizarre.
>> No. 448995 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 11:15 pm
448995 spacer
>>448992

Actually fat is always too far for me, but I do have a weakness for a bit of chub. I just don't really like a girl who's all skin and bones to be fair, they have to be shapely.

The prime and top tier is when you get that slightly curvy figure- just a bit of muffin top, I mean- on our favourite archetype, the council estate goth girl. They're always the dirtiest slags, guaranteed. Might be a bit on the thick side in conversation, but they make up for it in sheer enthusiasm when you get them in bed.

Thinking about it that's probably just my biggest weakness, out of anything. Enthusiasm. I don't need them to be into every kink under the sun, but so many lasses have this negative attitude about sex, as though it's a chore, as if you're at Crufts and you have to do the assault course perfectly before you're allowed five minutes in the slippery hot dog tunnel.

I have no time or inclination for that, when a girl wants to get me off and isn't shy about it, that's the best; and I will return it in kind.
>> No. 448996 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 11:51 pm
448996 spacer
Kunt is going to have another bash at getting a Number one with his Boris song given the last few days.
>> No. 448997 Anonymous
12th January 2022
Wednesday 11:58 pm
448997 spacer
>>448982
> In the end I just got blackout drunk and gave her a half-hearted knobbing in the morning.

Glad to know I'm not the only one to have to done this when confronted by tinder lass who turns up a good five stone heavier than her pics.
>> No. 448998 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 12:04 am
448998 spacer
>>448995
> Enthusiasm

It's a super concept and easy to understand in these woke times. You don't just need/want consent from a partner, it has to be enthusiastic consent. Find yourself someone who is into it.
>> No. 448999 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 1:43 am
448999 spacer
>>448998

I'd be a really shit rapist to be fair, I can't even get it up unless they're visibly and audibly enjoying it. Just looking at their boobs isn't enough to get my chap interested I'm afraid.

I might be naive but I think a lot of men are the same way, especially once you're beyond the randy teenage years. That's why I've never bought the whole "declining salmon populations" thing- I get what they're saying, but it just doesn't hold up next to my experience. The kind of men who do rapes have something exceptional about them in order to be able to do it.
>> No. 449000 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 9:18 am
449000 spacer
>>448999
>declining salmon populations

I'm guessing this is either declining salmon populations or toxic masculinity.
>> No. 449001 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 9:28 am
449001 spacer
declining salmon populations it is. I think "declining salmon populations" does exist to an extent, but I'm not sure that "declining salmon populations" was the most apt phrase for it.

You've only got to look at how women are treated in places like Egypt, India and Rotherham Latin America to see the pervasive effects of cultural attitudes towards women. My girlfriend used to be a teaching assistant and she said a lot of Asian lads were brought up to view women as inferior. You can certainly change attitudes so that women are respected and not seen as pieces of meat, but the whole "teach men not to rape" thing is entirely spurious. With the best will in the world, there will always be rapists because some people are fucked in the head regardless.

I do wonder if online dating is making attitudes towards women worse. You've only got to look at some of the recent posts on here to see that the way lasses are viewed is gradually being dehumanised.
>> No. 449002 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 10:04 am
449002 spacer
>>449001
>I do wonder if online dating is making attitudes towards women worse. You've only got to look at some of the recent posts on here to see that the way lasses are viewed is gradually being dehumanised.

Because heaven forbid that someone moans about the behaviour of the opposite sex on the dating scene. That was completely unheard of before the rise of dating apps.
>> No. 449003 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 10:26 am
449003 spacer
>>449002
The rise of dating apps has made things a lot more impersonal and transactional. That isn't to say things were perfect before, but online dating has definitely led to interactions being less... human.
>> No. 449004 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 10:37 am
449004 spacer
>>448998
'Enthusiastic consent' is puritanical American, sex-negative bollocks, driven by the kind of people who are weird enough to get into bed with someone they don't trust not to rape them, and don't feel comfortable saying 'no' to.

People with a healthy attitude towards sex don't need to give enthusiastic consent because they don't see it as a weapon or a massive, huge, super significant thing. It's just a bit of joint, or group, exercise, that may be used for bonding too.

Granted this may be a bit of a hot take, and I need to refine my opinions here because I sound like a rapist. But I couldn't get a stiffy for someone who wasn't at least trying to turn me on, so in practice I know I'm alreet. And you lads are generally a good sounding board, so what do the more measured among you think?

Now just for my personal edification: if it's not 'toxic masculinity', is it 'declining salmon populations'? I'm guessing it is, in which case without the context clues I would never have guessed it. In which case, dolphin rape/dolphin rape takes on another meaning, does it not?
>> No. 449005 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 11:30 am
449005 spacer
>>449004

I suspect that
>someone ... trying to turn me on
is 'Enthusiastic consent'. Either that or they're being a tease but it's fairly common sense if they suddenly go cold or say no, consent's been rescinded.
It's just Americans confusing the issue by making up terms for things people were already doing but not labelling.
>> No. 449006 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 1:09 pm
449006 spacer
Right. I'm going to assume it's declining salmon populations. That is, if you replace the vowels with Os, you'd get ropo coltoro.
>> No. 449007 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 1:50 pm
449007 spacer
>>449006
Don't be a carpet shagger mate. You're spoiling both the exclusivity of knowing it, and the enjoyment of figuring it out.
>> No. 449008 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 1:57 pm
449008 spacer
>>449007
All of the world filters are shit, mate. Quit being a faggot.
>> No. 449009 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 2:07 pm
449009 spacer
>>449008
I didn't say they were good. Keep up.
>> No. 449010 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 5:40 pm
449010 spacer
I think we might be living in the golden age of attractive women posting erotic photos of themselves on the internet.
>> No. 449011 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 5:50 pm
449011 spacer
>>449010
I've never used rudgwicksteamshow.co.uk until the middle of last year when I realised every kind of woman was posting her nude form to the site. Mostly it's advertising for their OF, but I never called into Babestation either so I'm good.
>> No. 449012 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 6:06 pm
449012 spacer
>>449010

We are, but I think it's not as fun anymore, when they're selling it or giving it away to everyone. It was much more exciting to get a furtive, private 480x360 tit pic.
>> No. 449013 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 6:09 pm
449013 spacer
>>449011
Don't get me wrong, as we further enter dystopia I fully imagine that the absolute presence of internet nudes will only continue to go up. I just think that right now, as the idea of paying a complete stranger on the internet for regular photos of their tits is just entering the mainstream, there's a great balance of the quality of the smut with the amount of freebies being posted about the place.
>> No. 449014 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 6:15 pm
449014 spacer
>>449011
rudgwicksteamshow.co.uk is mostly porn, they just keep it away from the likes of r/all and r/popular. It wasn't too long ago that one of the biggest subs was r/jailbait because the site had a notorious paedo problem.

r/lipsthatgrip, r/girlsfinishingthejob, r/frogbutt and r/baddragon are my go to sources if I fancy a crafty wank.
>> No. 449015 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 7:09 pm
449015 spacer
>>449014
I probably shouldn't ask but I don't want to actually go to the page and I can fathom a guess at the others, but what on earth is r/frogbutt?
>> No. 449016 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 7:10 pm
449016 spacer

tn98qOq4IjkVFjD5250BvlI_DD3uS31uYQ9Y3POFjxA.png
449016449016449016
>>449015
Loose approximations of this pose.
>> No. 449017 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 7:13 pm
449017 spacer
>>449014
You're talking bollocks. There's not a single NSFW sub in the top 100.
>> No. 449018 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 7:18 pm
449018 spacer
>>449017
According to some studies from 2010, 4% of all websites are porn. Someone from r/dataisbeautiful found that 24% of subwicks are porn. So you're right but it's still a huge amount.
>> No. 449019 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 7:25 pm
449019 spacer
>>449014
/r/baddragon seems to have an inordinate amount of trans posters recently. I don't want to see a surgically designed fanny and weird tits due to improper tagging. At least the cis lads actually mark their posts 'M' but the transgingers seem to think they're above this.

I just want to see women getting knotted.
>> No. 449020 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 7:35 pm
449020 spacer
>>449017
You don't actually join the porn subs unless you're a complete mentalist.
>> No. 449021 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 8:16 pm
449021 spacer
>>449010
Photos maybe, although the only photo source I use is Imagefap. In terms of videos, however, the amateur stuff has all gone because it was all controlled by Mindgeek and they just decided to shut down amateur content basically overnight. XTube has gone completely, when it used to be the best one. The best time for wanking was absolutely a couple of years ago. Fuck Mindgeek.
>> No. 449022 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 8:33 pm
449022 spacer
>>449021
I didn't use PornHub for a few years and it felt clearly noticeable that the range and quality of the videos on offer had dipped markedly. I don't have any particular niche tastes in porn, but it takes me a lot longer to find a video I'm happy to bash one out to unless I opt for the old reliable Ava Dalush in the gym with the lead piping.
>> No. 449023 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 8:42 pm
449023 spacer
Porn, art, photography, whatever it is I swear Twitter was invented to annoy those who enjoy it. A variation on the library of babel: any image you can imagine is probably lurking somewhere in its depths, but there's no index so good fucking luck finding anything.
>> No. 449024 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 8:48 pm
449024 spacer
>>449023
I once found an image on Google as a younglad when just searching letters of the alphabet in a moment of boredom/procrastination, which then became one of my go-to "get me going" pictures for a few years. I did commit to memory the names of the two pornstars in the photo, but I've long since forgotten them, and it obviously isn't in the first ten results for the letter D any more. The image itself wasn't depicting anything spectacular, just a topless blonde woman breathing on another topless blonde woman's neck from behind, but the fucking quality of the image is what kept me going back - while most of the internet was low-res gash at that time, this picture was so sharp and had been touched up so perfectly that I felt like I could reach in and touch the smooth tit.

If I were a better person, it would have inspired an early interest in photography and I would be an adult with a healthy hobby. Alas, I just wanked my life away.
>> No. 449025 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 9:11 pm
449025 spacer
>>449024
I just spent a couple of minutes looking for my analogue of this, a Shae Marks photo with her holding a rose in her teeth. It was sublime. Big hair, big tits, big tease. Wish she'd done some hardcore at some point tbf.

I remember when I was cybershagging in the furry chatrooms as a yout and someone sent me a full image set of Jeremy Bernal's sexyfur art. I wanked 8 times that day.
>> No. 449026 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 9:40 pm
449026 spacer
>>449025

>full image set of Jeremy Bernal's sexyfur art

Phwoar. That name is a blast from the past. I wonder what old timers like them are up to nowadays.

Kids these days don't know how easy they have it, compared to tracking down good furry smut on web 1.0, trawling every artist on VCL an Furnation manually, and finding out all the good ones had clocked they could paywall their shit.
>> No. 449027 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 9:50 pm
449027 spacer
>>449026
Yes furlad! I was hoping you'd be reading. That Sasha, what a minx.

I did look for some of his art recently but couldn't find anything, as far as I'm aware he hasn't produced any content (that I can find) for since the early noughties.

It was a rewarding struggle back then. You fought for your porn, and you damn well enjoyed it more for that.
>> No. 449028 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 9:58 pm
449028 spacer
Can you start a furry thread on either /x/ or /y/ please? I don't get the appeal, but I wouldn't mind a look to see what the fuss is about.
>> No. 449029 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 10:00 pm
449029 spacer
>>449025
>Jeremy Bernal's sexyfur art.

Oh god, the original vanilla straight furry porn, what a terrible gateway drug that was.
>> No. 449030 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 10:48 pm
449030 spacer
>>449028
Well I just started torrenting the siterip up to 2015 so you'll have your picks of the litter soon.

Wonder how quickly I'll get banned.

>>449029
Aye now you mention it, it really is basic. Still, tails.
>> No. 449031 Anonymous
13th January 2022
Thursday 11:35 pm
449031 spacer
>>449027

As far as I know there's only a couple of big names like Jay Naylor and Adam Wan still doing it from those days. Artists like those are seemingly stuck in a time warp, it's quite fascinating actually. Over the course of a decade, the quality and style hasn't changed much; and while it has probed into more adventurous fetishes, it's all still relatively conservative by furry standards, as though they wait for something to start getting relatively trendy on "real" porn sites before they'll consider drawing it.

It's definitely the furry porn for vanilla straight blokes, but I really don't know how that sort of audience stumbles onto it.
>> No. 449032 Anonymous
14th January 2022
Friday 4:03 pm
449032 spacer
Power cut in Beeston affecting ~1,300 houses which is estimated to last until about half 5. It sounds absolutely fucking mental outside because it's set off so many burglar alarms.
>> No. 449033 Anonymous
15th January 2022
Saturday 1:28 am
449033 spacer
>>449028
>Can you start a furry thread on either /x/ or /y/ please? I don't get the appeal, but I wouldn't mind a look to see what the fuss is about.

Are you happy now?
>> No. 449034 Anonymous
15th January 2022
Saturday 7:44 am
449034 spacer
>>449033
Jokes on you. I only use /sfw/ anyway.
>> No. 449060 Anonymous
15th January 2022
Saturday 6:37 pm
449060 spacer
Somebody with what appears to be a Croatian landline number keeps trying to phone me whenever I'm not at home.

A reverse lookup turned up nothing, so I guess it's just somebody who is trying to reach a friend or relative here in the UK.

That, or Croatian home burglars have gotten craftier.
>> No. 449079 Anonymous
17th January 2022
Monday 7:24 pm
449079 spacer
Today I drove 2 hours down the M1 to listen to someone tell me about when they had to care for their mum and rub rash cream into her fanny.
>> No. 449080 Anonymous
17th January 2022
Monday 7:46 pm
449080 spacer
>>449079
How much were they charging you?
>> No. 449081 Anonymous
17th January 2022
Monday 7:54 pm
449081 spacer
Handing myself into the dumb-dumb police as I just spent a minute or two looking at headphone extension cables thinking "why are they all 3.5 metres long"?
>> No. 449082 Anonymous
17th January 2022
Monday 10:00 pm
449082 spacer
I'm in discussion to get a full on sleeve Tattoo.
My only tattoo otherwise is a small square on my back done with a home kit.
>> No. 449083 Anonymous
17th January 2022
Monday 11:35 pm
449083 spacer
>>449082
What kind of style are you interested in for the sleeve? And did you already pick a tattooer to do it?
>> No. 449084 Anonymous
18th January 2022
Tuesday 12:34 am
449084 spacer
>>449081
Nope; no idea. Why are they?
>> No. 449085 Anonymous
18th January 2022
Tuesday 3:05 am
449085 spacer

3516-3m-3-5mm-jack-to-jack-stereo-extension-audio-.jpg
449085449085449085
>>449084
>> No. 449086 Anonymous
18th January 2022
Tuesday 10:59 am
449086 spacer
>>449084
Audio jacks are 3.5mm, but I went insane ignored the second "m".

>>449085
Yeah.
>> No. 449087 Anonymous
18th January 2022
Tuesday 11:08 am
449087 spacer
>>449086
Never used to have 3.5mms when I was a kid, they were always 6.35mm.
>> No. 449088 Anonymous
18th January 2022
Tuesday 11:13 am
449088 spacer
Incidentally it's annoying that smartphones are phasing out the 3.5mm jack. Is it possible to get a splitter for USB-C that would enable you to use earphones and charge your phone at the same time? Or is that not physically possible?
>> No. 449089 Anonymous
18th January 2022
Tuesday 12:32 pm
449089 spacer
>>449088
There are tiny little sound cards that do this - they're USB, but often provide a couple of headphone/mic jacks and a volume knob.
>> No. 449090 Anonymous
18th January 2022
Tuesday 1:08 pm
449090 spacer
>>449088

That also annoys the piss out of me, because I've still got plenty of analog audio equipment that I like to connect my smartphone to, e.g. my home stereo system but also my car radio (older-model Audi Navigation Plus) which has Bluetooth connectivity for the phone function but still needs a 3.5mm AUX connection if you want to play your smartphone music on it.

The reason why they are phasing out 3.5mm isn't just to save 25p on the connector socket itself, but also because of design simplicity, which in itself further reduces production cost per unit. Also, customers today expect tight waterproofing, and a 3.5mm hole in your phone is going to be a point of entry for water that is difficult to design around and which can always fail at some point. Even putting a USB connector at the bottom of the phone is taking a risk in that respect. It could be that many smartphones won't have any physical interface points at all in the future, with wireless charging becoming more standard. There probably also won't be SD card slots anymore, because it will again be cheaper to just increase internal memory, and SIM cards are also starting to get phased out in favour of built-in eSIM. So your phone is essentially going to become a hermetically fused-together black box, which also means you'll be screwed if it breaks and you cannot retrieve your photos or other personal data. This is already an issue with cheaper laptop PCs with eMMC instead of a removable SSD.


>>449089

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Headphone-Adapter-Hi-Res-Compatible-Samsung/dp/B07RMY3V9D/ref=sr_1_3?crid=18LS0AXDF05PI&keywords=benfei+usb-c+to+3.5mm+adapter&qid=1642510096&sprefix=benfei+usb-c+to+3.5mm+adapte%2Caps%2C424&sr=8-3
>> No. 449091 Anonymous
18th January 2022
Tuesday 1:15 pm
449091 spacer
>>449090

Sorry, wrong link.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Belkin-RockStar-Charge-Adapter-Samsung/dp/B07QS5CH5V/ref=sr_1_3?crid=3CG465TA5L6OB&keywords=Belkin+Adapter+USB-C+3%2C5+mm+RockStar&qid=1642511691&sprefix=belkin+adapter+usb-c+3+5+mm+rockstar%2Caps%2C585&sr=8-3
>> No. 449092 Anonymous
18th January 2022
Tuesday 1:49 pm
449092 spacer
>>449091
Those are the ones - they're actually tiny little sound cards. The chips are hidden inside the plugs.
>> No. 449093 Anonymous
18th January 2022
Tuesday 2:57 pm
449093 spacer
>>449092

The consolation of only having a USB-C port is that they're built like a brick shithouse and you can connect basically anything to them if you've got the right dongle. I regularly hook up a full-size audio interface to my phone so I can use my fancy studio microphones for Zoom calls.
>> No. 449094 Anonymous
18th January 2022
Tuesday 6:11 pm
449094 spacer
>>449093
>a full-size audio interface to my phone

That's a really good idea and not something that had occured to me before. I also use a studio microphone for video conf calls (just Audio Technica but it's still way better than not having it) and had wondered how I might do that on a phone/tablet.

Have you ever tried plugging a webcam into it too? USB hub?
>> No. 449095 Anonymous
18th January 2022
Tuesday 6:26 pm
449095 spacer
>>449094

USB hubs definitely work, which is handy for power passthrough. Keyboards, mice and USB MIDI keyboards all work fine. Haven't tried a webcam, because the reason I use my phone in the first place is for the quality of the front-facing camera. I believe that any class-compliant camera should work, but app support may be patchy. I do know that some people use HDMI capture devices to use their phone or tablet as a video monitor.
>> No. 449096 Anonymous
18th January 2022
Tuesday 6:42 pm
449096 spacer
I've come off my bike this morning right by some builders digging up the road. Proper scraped fmy knee like a schoolboy.

The builders were asking me if I was okay which probably made it more embarrassing than if they had just mocked me.
>> No. 449097 Anonymous
18th January 2022
Tuesday 7:40 pm
449097 spacer
>>449096
I helped a bloke up off the floor yesterday after his motorbike toppled onto him. Turns out he couldn't get out from under it because he had one entire metal leg. He just hopped back on and zipped away.
>> No. 449098 Anonymous
18th January 2022
Tuesday 8:33 pm
449098 spacer
>>449097
>he had one entire metal leg. He just hopped
Fuck you.
561 posts omitted. First 100 posts shown.

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password