I would but my personal choice is on a euro tour adding to their bug count with new strains of covid so I'll have to wait a while. No point dying with an intact arsehole.
Maybe ten years ago, she's but an old boiler now. Now Izabella Queiroz (http://izabellaqueiroz.com/) actually passes and has a cock as thick as your wrist. Packing your lube definitely advised.
Quite and she's not even a looker by the highest Brazilian standards, she's only really a contender in the north east of the country where most girls look like Gwart off Silicon Valley. If you head down to Sao Paulo or Santa Catarina there are some birds who legitimately look like models and have cocks like one of those pint cans of Stella with an apple on top.
I had never read this before. I remember I tried to track it down probably 15 years ago, but I wound up with the film on DVD so I watched that instead and it wasn't really the same.
As expected, it's very well made but not remotely enjoyable. It's probably a bit futile to point out how hideously grim it is, but it really is grim.
>>21448 They are a bit dim and twee, but that just adds to the realism. I had grandparents like these people. In the modern world, these people get on my tits, but when I was under 10, that was just what old people were like. They do the things my mum does, just needlessly describing things as nice ("I'm going to have a nice biscuit"), and it does my nut in but they're so like my family that it distresses me. It makes me wonder what age this is aimed at: is it for kids, even though adorable grandparents graphically die of radiation poisoning, or is it for adults, even though it has a childlike style? I suspect that it's designed to make adults feel like children again, to be extra terrifying.
On a side note, I always thought it was hilarious in Ricky Gervais's TV series, Extras, where his sitcom was called When the Whistle Blows and Stephen Merchant kept accidentally calling it When the Wind Blows. Please share this enjoyable memory with me, to take all our minds off how absolutely grim the thing I've just read is.
After a year of covidiocy, I'm all for a nuclear war if the main casualties are people who are too dim to follow basic instructions. John and Peggy are the kind of pricks who wear a mask around their chin and take it off to talk to people.
>>21474 The instructions are not entirely basic. There's a bit where the man (James, not John) is unsure how to protect the house because one bit of government advice says to keep windows clear, and the other says to paint them white. That was one of my favourite bits, because it's so realistic to show that even the government don't know what to do and they're just guessing.
Also, this was written in 1982 and people WERE dumber back then.
In future generations they'll look back on the flimsy cloth masks we strapped to our faces in exactly the same kind of "God, that's all they had?" manner as we look at the utterly bleak and inadequate lean-to fallout shelter people knew as their only hope in the Cold War. Pretty fitting parallel you've drawn there honestly.
Deep down underneath we know it does practically fuck all and we're only marginally better off taking our chances out in the open, but we cling to the bit of stability and psychological security it gives us because otherwise we'd completely lose it. It's okay, I can go to the shop, despite the deadly virus. I've got a bit of cotton over my mouth.
The past couple of years are going to look utterly grim in the history books.
>>21476 >Deep down underneath we know it does practically fuck all and we're only marginally better off taking our chances out in the open, but we cling to the bit of stability and psychological security it gives us because otherwise we'd completely lose it
Nonsense. Nobody was wearing masks until they had to to get into supermarkets.
>>21480 Out of curiosity, are you also the guy who endorses hard work as a path out of poverty, regardless of other social factors? I accept that you might not be, but if you are, I have an argument that will absolutely obliterate both your opinions irreparably and forever, but it will only work if you're both the same person.
>>21480 Having actually studied the virulence, morbidity and vectors of the flu, Covid makes it look like a complete and utter amateur. The reason Flu cases are down is because it can't spread anywhere near as easily and everyone is keeping their distance from each other, it's fairly simple.
Myself and many others in my field are firmly in the "created in a lab" camp, but talking about that publicly is career suicide. Arguing over whether this is real or not is exactly what I would want people to be doing if I were responsible for exposing the world to this, because there would be nothing stopping me from doing it again with something far more deadly and watching while the West collapses under the weight of the hubris of cretins like you.
The messaging in Protect and Survive was beautifully clear, which really shows up how shit the government's coronavirus comms have been.
The booklet said "Remove net curtains or thin materials from windows - but leave heavy curtains and blinds as these can be drawn before an attack as protection against flying glass. Clear out old newspapers and magazines. Coat windows inside with diluted emulsion paint of a light colour so that they will reflect away much of the heat flash, even if the blast which will follow is to shatter them."
A huge amount of research and effort went into our civil defence strategy, because it would have worked. We knew from Hiroshima and Nagasaki that nuclear attacks were survivable and relatively small steps could massively improve your odds.
I agree that people in the past were thick as mince.
I just did another google for modern advice on how to survive a nuclear attack, and came across the US government's Ready.gov site. Hilariously, it mixes its instructions with Covid-19 safety.
>Remove contaminated clothing and wipe off or wash unprotected skin if you were outside after the fallout arrived. Hand sanitizer does not protect against fall out. Avoid touching your eyes, nose, and mouth, if possible. Do not use disinfectant wipes on your skin.
>Go to the basement or middle of the building. Stay away from the outer walls and roof. Try to maintain a distance of at least six feet between yourself and people who are not part of your household. If possible, wear a mask if you’re sheltering with people who are not a part of your household. Children under two years old, people who have trouble breathing, and those who are unable to remove masks on their own should not wear them.
>Stay inside for 24 hours unless local authorities provide other instructions. Continue to practice social distancing by wearing a mask and by keeping a distance of at least six feet between yourself and people who not part of your household.
>Engage virtually with your community through video and phone calls. Know that it’s normal to feel anxious or stressed. Many people may already feel fear and anxiety about the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). The threat of a nuclear explosion can add additional stress. Follow CDC guidance for managing stress during a traumatic event and managing stress during COVID-19.
There are numerous Laboratories throughout the world poking at pathogens in controlled environments, in order to attempt to predict how they might potentially mutate in the wild, and how to stay a few steps ahead of those mutations by already having some data for mitigation purposes. It's possible that some attempt to prevent a second SARS outbreak may have inadvertantly caused it by failing to recognise some superpowered traits, or just a consequence of stereotypical Peoples Republic of Don'tGiveaFuckaboutPeople'sSafety Corporate carelessness.
So when you say "created in a lab" you don't literally mean, this virus is manufactured, from raw ingredients, ground up, 100% artificially produced? Because while it's a subtle distinction it nevertheless means an entirely different thing than just being some mutant strain they had sitting around when some placement student left the isolation cabinet open.
Anyone who could create a virus in the lab would be world famous and richer than Musk, Bezos or Gates combined already.
I'm not ThatLad, but I keep Occam's Razor in mind when considering raunchy claims, so I jumped in with a not exactly controversial possibility. Because that's what >>21488 meant, right? Cough in my face if wrong.
>>21493 I'm not the guy you asked, but it's one hell of a coincidence that coronavirus started in the Chinese city of Wuhan, which is also home to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which just happens to be a world-leading research centre into coronaviruses in particular. Of course, maybe they built the lab there because Wuhan is known for its naturally occurring coronaviruses. I don't know. But all that's needed for it to be the Wuhan lab's fault is for Chinese medical research to not always stick to the rules they promise to stick to. In the country that built a new hospital in a week, and then it fell down because it was so poorly built, do YOU think China maybe sometimes bends the rules?
It didn't start in Wuhan though, your information is about 8 months out of date. That was just the first place to notice it spreading in a big way.
Is it a big coincidence that the first place to identify something just happens to be one of the few places best equipped to identify it? No. Not unless you're a thicky-thicky dumb-dumb.
https://www.msn.com/en-ph/news/world/coronavirus-didn-e2-80-99t-originate-in-wuhan-who-confirms/ar-BB17HmZj
I think you'd have to show me the actual proof of these claims made by a Chinese official rather than a very short article that just mentions he cites them.
