[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
games

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply [First 100 posts]
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 9501)
Message
File  []
close
1319540588106.jpg
950195019501
>> No. 9501 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 12:14 pm
9501 spacer
http://www.rockstargames.com/
Expand all images.
>> No. 9506 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 12:53 pm
9506 spacer
>>9501
ALL OF MY MONEY.

Rockstar is the only company that can generate so much Buzz form a simple logo release.
>> No. 9507 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 1:49 pm
9507 spacer
>>9501
Look at the Five.... It suggest GTA Britfa.gs
>> No. 9508 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 1:52 pm
9508 spacer
Trailer release on 2nd November? That's little over a week before the Skyrim release! Surely this must be a blatant attempt at sabotage on Skyrim's sales. Look at that, too, it's the fifth game in the series. Don't Bethesda have a trademark on the number five?

If I were Bethesda, I'd sue the shit out of Rockstar for this. It's only right.
>> No. 9510 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 2:22 pm
9510 spacer
>"features characters including a "Welsh monk/cult leader/yoga teacher""

Nepal massiv?
>> No. 9511 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 2:25 pm
9511 spacer
I hope it has a map the size of SA.
I got bored bloody fast on GTA4 despite fancy graphics.
>> No. 9512 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 2:44 pm
9512 spacer
What? What? They aren't milking it for a series of games like they did GTA III? Oh wait I guess they did a couple. But they're already moving on? People are still raving about GTA IV!
>> No. 9513 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 2:46 pm
9513 spacer
>>9507
Nah it looks like the engraved decoration you get on dollar bills.
>> No. 9517 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 3:45 pm
9517 spacer
>>9507
Ever since GTA london I've wanted a full GTA in Britain.
>> No. 9518 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 3:48 pm
9518 spacer
>>9517
I would have sex with the box if that were to happen.

Just think of it! All those tiny villages to drive to and destroy, fuck I'd have so much fun. It well never be though, no one will painstakingly recreate the entire of Britain and give it GTA Gameplay ;__;
>> No. 9519 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 3:57 pm
9519 spacer
>>9518
I wanted to say "Real life will have to do, then!" but I just remembered that one of my favourite childhood games was using the character model cheat to make myself into a granny and walking around beating up black people.

I can't become a granny in real life.
>> No. 9520 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 4:17 pm
9520 spacer
>>9517
The Getaway games did London well.

I always wnated on that took up the full lenght & bredth of the country though.
>> No. 9521 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 4:21 pm
9521 spacer
Last game was sort of shit to be honest.
>> No. 9522 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 4:24 pm
9522 spacer
>>9518
I was thinking more along the lines of a shoot out in Birmingham but those villages would certainly be on my list as well.
>> No. 9523 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 4:31 pm
9523 spacer
Unfortunately according to rumours on Kotaku this one is in San Andreas again; a leaked casting list has a plethora of Hollywood and hillbilly characters.
>> No. 9524 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 5:10 pm
9524 spacer
makes me think of las vegas.
>> No. 9525 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 5:12 pm
9525 spacer
>>9501
Rockstar know how to do this shit.

Cue a week of endless speculation and theorising from all corners of the internet.

Come trailer day, their site crashes due to the endless traffic. Guarenteed million seller.
>> No. 9526 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 5:14 pm
9526 spacer
>>9525
Well of course lad, it's GTA.
>> No. 9527 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 5:15 pm
9527 spacer
>>9501
If the trailer was released on the 11th of February, why hasn't anyone seen it?
>> No. 9529 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 5:26 pm
9529 spacer

smug motherfucker.jpg
952995299529
>>9527
Very good.
>> No. 9531 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 6:44 pm
9531 spacer
>>9529

"an excellent post"
>> No. 9533 Anonymous
25th October 2011
Tuesday 8:30 pm
9533 spacer
>>9531
Yes it was post excellent.
>> No. 9658 Anonymous
1st November 2011
Tuesday 11:13 pm
9658 spacer
>>9501
Tomorrow at 4pm lads.

Prepare for not being able to see it til 7 or so when they get their servers recovered from the overload.
>> No. 9659 Anonymous
1st November 2011
Tuesday 11:54 pm
9659 spacer
>>9658
And prepare to have an 80s song completely ruined by twits.

I really like that Astley song but I can't admit it without THOSE idiots.
>> No. 9661 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 1:13 am
9661 spacer
mental to think this game is being developed just 5 minutes up the road from me.

I've heard a few of the employees like to consume alcohol in a pub called the conan doyle, which is situated near the studio. Might pop in and threaten them with a Molotov cocktail, see if i can loosen some tongues. I'm sure they'll appreciate the irony.
>> No. 9663 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 8:07 am
9663 spacer
>>9659
I could be wrong, but I think Rick Rolling is very rarely done these days because most of the videos on YouTube have a 30 second advert beforehand.
>> No. 9664 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 8:43 am
9664 spacer
>>9513

My thoughts exactly.

>>9521

It wasn't nearly as fun as San Andreas. I hope this new one sees the return of quad bikes / planes etc...
>> No. 9668 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 3:48 pm
9668 spacer
10 minutes lads.
>> No. 9670 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 3:52 pm
9670 spacer
>>9668
I've packed my rice in prep.

Been waiting for 2 hours.
>> No. 9671 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 3:58 pm
9671 spacer
2 minutes lads.
>> No. 9672 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 3:59 pm
9672 spacer
>>9501
AWWWWWWWWWWWWW HERE IT GOES
>> No. 9674 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 4:00 pm
9674 spacer
VICE CITY I fucking called it.
>> No. 9675 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 4:01 pm
9675 spacer
Well I suppose that looks quite fun.
>> No. 9677 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 4:02 pm
9677 spacer
http://www.rockstargames.com/newswire/article/19341/grand-theft-auto-v-trailer-110211.html

San Andreas?
>> No. 9678 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 4:04 pm
9678 spacer
>>9674
Vinewood? Looks like San Andreas, m8.
>> No. 9680 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 4:07 pm
9680 spacer

turds.jpg
968096809680
I lol'd when I watched the count down go from 01 seconds to the pic attached.

Got it working, this looks good - more like San Andreas, golf buggies, planes, jetskis - big open areas.

Awww yeah.
>> No. 9681 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 4:07 pm
9681 spacer
>>9678
Pff yeah like I don't know my GTA.
>> No. 9682 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 4:08 pm
9682 spacer
>Not london
don't care.
>> No. 9683 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 4:10 pm
9683 spacer
>>9682
May I ask why?
>> No. 9684 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 4:11 pm
9684 spacer
>>9681

Vinewood is in Los Santos which is in San Andreas.
>> No. 9685 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 4:15 pm
9685 spacer
>>9684
Seems like it might just be Los Santos.
>> No. 9686 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 4:16 pm
9686 spacer
>>9501
The numberplates say San ANdreas on them, so I expect the next trailer will show off another city
>> No. 9687 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 4:20 pm
9687 spacer
>>9686
That's because states have license plates, not cities.
>> No. 9688 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 4:24 pm
9688 spacer
>>9683
Because I've seen all this shit before.
>> No. 9689 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 4:30 pm
9689 spacer
>>9688
But this time there are blimps!
>> No. 9691 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 5:19 pm
9691 spacer
Rockstar has a cycle that begun from GTA IV to current. They go from good game to bad game to good game.

GTA IV = bad
Red Dead Redemption = good
LA Noire = bad

If GTA V is there next game it'll be good but that means if Agent finally comes out after then it'll be bad.
>> No. 9692 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 5:39 pm
9692 spacer

1320254413269.jpg
969296929692
VERY VAGUE SIMILARITIES
>> No. 9693 Anonymous
2nd November 2011
Wednesday 6:36 pm
9693 spacer
meh
>> No. 9706 Anonymous
3rd November 2011
Thursday 4:53 am
9706 spacer
>>9691
What was bad about GTA IV?
>> No. 9708 Anonymous
3rd November 2011
Thursday 8:20 am
9708 spacer
>>9706

It wasn't nearly as fun as San Andreas.

Yahtzee called it pretty right when he said Saint Rows 2 > GTA IV ... imho

5 looks like the GTA I was hoping 4 would be.

Hoping...
>> No. 9710 Anonymous
3rd November 2011
Thursday 8:57 am
9710 spacer
>>9706
GTA IV wasn't a bad game, it was just wasn't up to the usual GTA standard.
>> No. 9711 Anonymous
3rd November 2011
Thursday 11:33 am
9711 spacer
>>9691
L.A noire wasn't really a rockstar game, they just published it.

>>9710
They just went in a different direction. I enjoyed it as much as SA.
>> No. 9714 Anonymous
3rd November 2011
Thursday 12:21 pm
9714 spacer
>>9710

I felt GTA IV was more of a dramatic title. The expansions feel so much more GTA-y it's unbelievable. None of this I AM UNHEPPY AFTER WAR IN HOME COUNTRY.

I'd give GTA IV maybe a 7/10 as it was enjoyable despite the soberness of most of it. If we were rating it as a new IP it'd get a 9/10.

High hopes for V.
>> No. 9715 Anonymous
3rd November 2011
Thursday 12:34 pm
9715 spacer
The last good one was Vice City.
>> No. 9720 Anonymous
3rd November 2011
Thursday 2:09 pm
9720 spacer
>>9501
Officially confirmed as being only Los Santos & surrounding countryside.

No full on S.A for you.
>> No. 9723 Anonymous
3rd November 2011
Thursday 3:26 pm
9723 spacer
>>9720
It's not the same San Andreas as GTA:SA. Los Santos will be a proper city like Liberty in GTA IV instead of a tiny town. Remember San Andreas was originally a city rather than a state too, they just changed that so they could show off how big they can make their games. Doesn't mean this one will be smaller.
>> No. 9724 Anonymous
3rd November 2011
Thursday 3:26 pm
9724 spacer
>>9720
The wind turbines and that oil driller are parts of the desert areas in SA. Plus some of the city scenes could be San Fierro.

Although it was strange they didn't show off Las Venturas.
>> No. 9726 Anonymous
3rd November 2011
Thursday 3:32 pm
9726 spacer
>>9724
They issued a press release saying it was, as >>9720 said, "Los Santos & surrounding countryside". That's where the turbines and oil driller(?) were.
>> No. 9729 Anonymous
3rd November 2011
Thursday 4:10 pm
9729 spacer
>>9726
Fuck that it isn't San Andreas without San Fierro and Las Venturas. I can't believe Rockstar have done this. San Andreas' biggest draw was the variety in environments.
>> No. 9730 Anonymous
3rd November 2011
Thursday 4:23 pm
9730 spacer
>>9729
I think the whole 'surrounding countryside' thing is to give a variety of terrain. The trailer indicated that much. There just won't be 3 distinct cities this time, is what I assume they mean.
>> No. 9731 Anonymous
3rd November 2011
Thursday 4:44 pm
9731 spacer
When is the game actually out? Does it have a release date yet?
>> No. 9732 Anonymous
3rd November 2011
Thursday 5:45 pm
9732 spacer
>>9731
Nope, nor does it have an announced list of platforms.
>> No. 9736 Anonymous
3rd November 2011
Thursday 8:57 pm
9736 spacer
>>9732
360, PS3, PC

Potentially Vita, Wii U and Sucessors to 350 / PS3
>> No. 9738 Anonymous
3rd November 2011
Thursday 10:34 pm
9738 spacer
>>9736
I doubt it will be that long until release. Or maybe I just hope it won't.
>> No. 9743 Anonymous
3rd November 2011
Thursday 11:28 pm
9743 spacer
the trailer reminded me of this short film/advert for inherent vice by thomas pynchon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjWKPdDk0_U
>> No. 9745 Anonymous
4th November 2011
Friday 12:30 am
9745 spacer
The trailer looks rather nice, I wonder if GTA IV was more of a test then anything.

Either way I shall definitely be buying it, I'm due a game since I've decided not to buy BF3 or MW3. I just hope there is none of the mobile phone bullshit in it.

Normal cheats would be nice too, I haven't done more then 10 missions on any GTA since 2, I'd rather have a pigs off cheat once and just fuck about for hours instead of having to drag up a phone if you run a red light, let alone cross a bloody island.
>> No. 9754 Anonymous
4th November 2011
Friday 11:41 pm
9754 spacer

1320446769090.jpg
975497549754
>>9501
Oh, hi there.
>> No. 9755 Anonymous
4th November 2011
Friday 11:43 pm
9755 spacer

1320448227779.jpg
975597559755
>>9754
Oh sneaky rockstar.
>> No. 9758 Anonymous
5th November 2011
Saturday 12:03 am
9758 spacer
>>9755

I don't get it.
>> No. 9762 Anonymous
5th November 2011
Saturday 1:00 am
9762 spacer
>>9758
Apparently leaked shots of the maps, although they provide fuck all information.
>> No. 9763 Anonymous
5th November 2011
Saturday 1:04 am
9763 spacer
>>9762
Oh you know apart from Las Venturas making a return despite Rockstar saying it wasn't going to be in GTAV.

If these images are real then LV will be DLC.
>> No. 9783 Anonymous
5th November 2011
Saturday 3:51 pm
9783 spacer
>>9520

>The Getaway games did London well.

Except you couldn't Free Explore properly because the police were always smashing into you.
>> No. 9784 Anonymous
5th November 2011
Saturday 4:18 pm
9784 spacer
>>9783
Dont drive like a buffoon
>> No. 9802 Anonymous
6th November 2011
Sunday 5:17 pm
9802 spacer
>>9784

They chase you even if you don't, because you're exploring as Marcus or whatever his name is.
>> No. 10037 Anonymous
17th November 2011
Thursday 8:24 am
10037 spacer
The one thing that annoyed me about SA was, IMO, it was a missed opportunity.

In the original GTA, LC was New York, VC was Miami, and SA was Dan Francisco.

They kept LC as based on New York, they kept VC as Miami AND set it in tge 80s which was the best decade they could have done it....but then with SA they made it a mix of a few well known West coast cities. When ideally it should have been just San Francisco and set in the 70s, which would have allowed for references to Bullit, Dirty Harry etc.

Don't get me wrong, SA was phenomenal but I wish they had done it as San Francisco in the 70s. Maybe if they ever do one with the 'Always Mentioned Never Seen' Carcer City, that can be the theme?
>> No. 10038 Anonymous
17th November 2011
Thursday 9:06 am
10038 spacer
>>10037
We've been to Carcer City in the first Manhunt game.
>> No. 10039 Anonymous
17th November 2011
Thursday 1:28 pm
10039 spacer
>>10038
Not to mention that Carcer City is in the same state as Liberty, so how it could possibly resemble San Fran is a bit puzzling.
>> No. 10040 Anonymous
17th November 2011
Thursday 1:45 pm
10040 spacer
>>10037

Would that not just be an entirely different game then?
>> No. 13093 Anonymous
20th May 2012
Sunday 3:15 am
13093 spacer
I hate to seem like "that lad" but I have it on good authority (by which I mean we're damn well over due) that we'll be getting our second trailer some time in the next month.
>> No. 13098 Anonymous
20th May 2012
Sunday 11:15 am
13098 spacer
>>10037
>When ideally it should have been just San Francisco and set in the 70s, which would have allowed for references to Bullit, Dirty Harry etc.

That would have been cool. But this was at a time where they were working on Red Dead, right? Maybe one scowling Clint Eastwood figure was enough for the devs.
>> No. 13099 Anonymous
20th May 2012
Sunday 12:41 pm
13099 spacer
>>13093
They did say they'd get back to other games after the the Max Payne 3 promotion was over.

WHERE IS MY BULLY 2?
>> No. 13139 Anonymous
23rd May 2012
Wednesday 10:35 pm
13139 spacer
24/05 is dawning, lads, which means a lot if you buy into that theory. Who thinks we're going to get some new info? I'm on the fence about the whole idea. It has been seven months after all...
>> No. 13140 Anonymous
24th May 2012
Thursday 12:02 pm
13140 spacer
>>13139
That long? Christ.

I'm still hoping for the reveal of San Fierro & Las Venturas.
LS & Surrounding areas can be as big as they want, but it just wont feel right if we're given a third of San Andreas.
>> No. 13145 Anonymous
25th May 2012
Friday 7:17 am
13145 spacer
I really hope this expands on GTA4 in the same way VC and SA did on GTA3.

GTA4 was just a next gen GTA3 with a better story and graphics. Gameplay wise it was almost a total downgrade from San Andreas.
>> No. 13146 Anonymous
25th May 2012
Friday 2:24 pm
13146 spacer
>>13145
Looking at the trailer seems to suggest the right direction.
I just hope the radio isn't shit.
>> No. 13934 Anonymous
21st August 2012
Tuesday 10:38 pm
13934 spacer

YESSSSJETSSS.png
139341393413934
The beast is waking... slowly. Three more screenshots to come this week then the "table" on the V site will be full. I'm smelling another trailer countdown within the next few weeks.
>> No. 13936 Anonymous
22nd August 2012
Wednesday 1:20 am
13936 spacer
>>13934
This is going to be this Generations Masterpiece, I guarantee it.
>> No. 13937 Anonymous
22nd August 2012
Wednesday 1:32 am
13937 spacer
>>13936
Surely it's going to get released alongside a StarCraft II expansion, which rather makes a mockery of your guarantee.
>> No. 13939 Anonymous
22nd August 2012
Wednesday 1:51 am
13939 spacer
>>13936
I'd go further, I'd call it this generation's Grand Theft Auto
>> No. 13940 Anonymous
22nd August 2012
Wednesday 1:56 pm
13940 spacer
>>13939
So, what was the best one of the PS2 generation?
San Andreas for me, with the lowest on the scale being Vice City. I dont get the love for it really. I enjoyed the atmosphere and the music etc, but the city itself if mostly big empty nothing. Useless airport, huge useless beach, all flat, and only one road where you can get up any speed at all n the 2nd island.
>> No. 13941 Anonymous
22nd August 2012
Wednesday 2:30 pm
13941 spacer

1345641117.jpg
139411394113941
Fuck Skyrim

I'm going to San Andreas.
>> No. 13942 Anonymous
22nd August 2012
Wednesday 3:25 pm
13942 spacer
>>13940
Definitely San Andreas for me, I spent a ridiculous amount of time playing it, to the point where I could tell you the entire soundtrack off the top of my head. The obvious Boyz n the Hood theme was the best thing ever as a teenager. Driving full speed around the countryside in an oil tanker or the monster truck listening to K-Rose amused me for way longer than it should have. Also, a lot of people moan about the leveling up, but as a massive RPG fan I loved it, I didn't even mind how limited it was. I was gutted when I played IV and they'd got rid of it.

I liked Vice City more than III, but I think it was just the soundtrack and because I liked Scarface.

IV is my least favorite, admittedly I haven't played the DLC and I've heard they FEEL more like GTA, but I got incredibly bored by the base game.

Can't wait for this, I really, really hope we get the whole of San Andreas, if not I hope they Include more countryside than city. The problem with setting it in San Andreas again is that us who played the original game want all the cites, no matter how big they make that one city it will still feel limited.
>> No. 13943 Anonymous
22nd August 2012
Wednesday 4:19 pm
13943 spacer

1345641162.jpg
139431394313943
>>13941
For I must be travelin on now....
>> No. 13944 Anonymous
22nd August 2012
Wednesday 4:19 pm
13944 spacer

1345641143.jpg
139441394413944
>>13943
Too many places I got to see.
>> No. 13945 Anonymous
22nd August 2012
Wednesday 4:43 pm
13945 spacer
>>13942
Indeed. I've said all along that they'll reveal the entire map closer to launch. Surely they too realise that San Andreas is more than Los Santos.
>> No. 13946 Anonymous
22nd August 2012
Wednesday 4:49 pm
13946 spacer
Oh fucking hell, it's beautiful.
Could this be San-An with IV graphics?! This is making me slightly horny.
>> No. 13947 Anonymous
22nd August 2012
Wednesday 6:50 pm
13947 spacer
>>13942

I used to take great pleasure in de-railing the trains and beating the pool shark up when I lost a game.
>> No. 13948 Anonymous
22nd August 2012
Wednesday 11:46 pm
13948 spacer

gta_san_andreas_map_hq[1].jpg
139481394813948
>>13945
Everyone knows San Andreas is the name of one city.
>> No. 13949 Anonymous
23rd August 2012
Thursday 12:08 am
13949 spacer
>>13947
I'm hoping for trains to be back and drivable. I used to love cruising around San Andreas. Hope they introduce a wider rail network this time too. With abandoned lines that go up into the mountains and shit so I can collapse bridges.
>> No. 13950 Anonymous
23rd August 2012
Thursday 2:31 am
13950 spacer
>>13949

Ahh the neverending "I want X back" or "I hope you can do Y". This touches on a larger issue though.

I feel the GTA series has become far too limited in it's scope recently. The reason it was such a success to begin with is because it offered unprecedented freedom- With the technology of the time, the simple ability to drive cars and shoot guns wherever and whenever you please felt like the world was your oyster.

By now it should be like a kind of uber-game, one genre to contain them all. Player agency should be the one and only focus of it's development; if I can think of something I should be able to do it, by virtue of the fact that all the elements are present, I just need to influence them in the right manner.

Instead, GTAIV was just a HD re-make of GTAII, and it felt badly behind the times for it. San Andreas was already making so much progress towards this sort of thing, way back in 2004, it really makes me wonder why they scrapped it all.
334 posts omitted. First 100 posts shown.

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password