- Files: GIF, JPG, PNG, Maximum:4000 KB, Thumbnails: 600x600 pixels
- Currently 1194 unique user posts. View catalogue
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ First 100 posts ] [ Last 50 posts ]
Posting mode: Reply [Last 50 posts][ Reply ]
386 posts omitted. Last 50 posts shown.
Expand all images.
|>>|| No. 14921
Isn't a week long ban for getting around a wordfilter a bit excessive? I'd have thought a one day ban, tops, would suffice.
This isn't ban evasion, either. I'm simply at someone else's house.
|>>|| No. 14922
>Isn't a week long ban for getting around a wordfilter a bit excessive?
I'd say you got off rather lightly there.
|>>|| No. 14923
Let's face it, the wordfilters are little more than forced memes from the mods. Some of them, such as losing the rhyming from "only a nonce needs a quick response", are objectively poorer than the words they've replaced.
|>>|| No. 14924
The wordfilters are mostly there to discourage the same tedious discussions of race, chronic masturbators, and fisherman's breakfasts from repeating over and over.
|>>|| No. 14929
I've been banned from /lit/ and I've genuinely no idea what for as the post appears to have been deleted.
|>>|| No. 14930
The mod didn't leave a report reason, unfortunately. He'll be along, hopefully. Your patronage is important to us. Please hold.
|>>|| No. 14965
laughing at lelds.png
I'm apparently permabanned for this post (now deleted): http://britfa.gs/spo/res/4917.html#8824
Does something really count as spam if you only post it once? I had no idea ten lines of ASCII was such a mortal sin. /spo/ is on life support anyway, nobody seems to have discussed the footy at all in my absence despite a truly remarkable couple of weeks. Anyway lesson learned, won't happen again etc.
|>>|| No. 15038
Lad banning me forever because you don't like the word cuck. Even though it made perfect sense in the flow of conversation seems an over reaction. In reality don't you think you are really trying to ban not me but part of yourself.🤔
Also I am not gay, you're gay. And I find your hetronormative micro agreesions of using it as an insult deeply troubling. Particularly in the context of a person who doesn't like the word cuck. Holds a mirror up to itself if you ask me.
Obviously I don't expect you to listen to me given I'm sure everything I say to question your judgement will probably only make you double down on your position. But it would be nice to be let back in at some point.
|>>|| No. 15041
It must be terribly disappointing that you haven't triggered me at all. I can only apologise. Obviously you have some growing up to do.
|>>|| No. 15043
Foam from his mouth,
Steam from his Ears!
He’s done it, he has,
He’s trolled him to tears!
|>>|| No. 15045
Obviously me suggesting perm banning me for saying cuck in a contextual joke might be a bit harsh, is just me being trolled to tears.
Clearly no one wants to discuss it properly, only sneer. Pity I liked this place over the years but obviously that doesn't really matter does it. Time for a new hobby.
|>>|| No. 15046
The mods certainly can be unduly harsh and hand out disproportionate punishments at times, but you don't have to be such a fadge about it.
|>>|| No. 15047
I know it's not the point of this thread, but I don't understand how people can get like that. .gs has plenty of in house memes and whatever, but imagine if every time you posted you had an uncontrollable compulsion to include one or more of them and not just on .gs, but everywhere you went on the imageboard sphere and perhaps even beyond. It's bloody horrible.
|>>|| No. 15049
This thread is for ban appeals, supplication and fry ups. Your posts constitute neither, you teary bumder.
Tip yourself into the big cup of tea.
|>>|| No. 15050
The term 'Appeals' covers disputes of sentencing and points of law. If you don't want people appealing dont call it appealing.
|>>|| No. 15052
>The term 'Appeals' covers disputes of sentencing and points of law.
Of which, as my honourable and learned friend pointed out, you've made neither of substance.
|>>|| No. 15053
Sir I assure you I am highly appealing. What I was doing was entertaining a perspective of an chronic masturbator given the very subject was in discussion as learned men are known to do with a nod and a wink. Unfortunately said nod and a wink function was broken in the posting settings on the site and I fear was taken quite literally.
What I became aware of though due to this misadventure was the use of perm banning which I feel as leaned men it is a mistake to resort to. After all the here rules are uncodified and this seems therefore an unreasonably heavy punishment for a miss step I would happy take a lesser punishment on the chin, but I simply must protest all uses of the perm ban not for that which is a gross violation of the english legal system or automated spamming. And this is the point I protest not the ban for that is a learning experience but permanency allows for no reason. How could one possibly cease to be a silly sausage if one is never permitted the opportunity of growth?
|>>|| No. 15055
For someone who claims to have been here for years, you sure do write like an outsider. The fact you seemed surprised at a dodgy ban sort of gives the game away too.
If you can't work out how to evade our bans you're not our sort of people anyway.
|>>|| No. 15056
More like squealing.
It's so galling.
It must be a chore, being so bumsore.
Off you fuck, stop being such a bore.
|>>|| No. 15057
Not for me, I mean it must be horrible being like that. I don't really care.
|>>|| No. 15058
>For someone who claims to have been here for years, you sure do write like an outsider
They write like a fucking spastic, if they'd been here for years we'd all be spastics too by now. I think that's how it works, anyway.
"Perm banning" is an entertaining mistake, though.
|>>|| No. 15060
So if a modlad could dial back my permaban for facetious jewbashing that'd be nice. Turns out my IP is static for the foreseeable because virgin are cunts, and if I have to phone post for the rest of my life it will severely degrade the grammatical quality of the website.
|>>|| No. 15062
I think I fully deserved my ban.
I talk a lot of shit when I've been drinking but the truth is these days I havn't run any of my scripts for yonks. I probably could circumvent it if I really wanted. But maybe not. Maybe the IoT has got tighter security these days.
I've got an actual tech job now (for the first time ever, after decades of skiddy shit XD) so I've told myself to behave.
I was a knob and I deserved it. I know we'll never agree on anything but I still like you.
|>>|| No. 15063
I'm not sure which ban you're on about, were you the paedo or the doxxer?
|>>|| No. 15081
Paedo or doxer, fucking hell. I was neither.
Just your regular old me myself and i2 with some drunk and high /pol/ tier posts.
|>>|| No. 15082
Honestly I get it. I was a redboard poster before I ever found this place. I don't really fit in here.
My ban isn't removed by the way. Something about pulled? Leave it there.
|>>|| No. 15116
I've received a permaban for >>/nom/13129 but I didn't actually make that post.
I'm assuming it was one of those inane "poo milkshake" type comments in the recipe thread but I haven't posted anything in that since the Choc Dip picture. Fair enough getting banned for my own shitposting, but it's a bit much receiving a ban meant for someone else.
|>>|| No. 15117
I'm so sorry. Dynamic IPs sometimes mean there is collateral damage like that.
|>>|| No. 15118
>Mods, please, I beg of thee, you must bin both posts. They add nothing to the thread and are an obvious attempt to derail it.
I fully accept my ban and applogise both for my inappropriate and misguided contribution, and potential derailment of the thread (though i will say it wasn't intended). Perhaps such posts are best suited to /iq/.
I'm sorry :(
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ First 100 posts ] [ Last 50 posts ]