[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
sheds

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply [Last 50 posts]
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 13515)
Message
File  []
close
SAUSAGE.jpg
135151351513515
>> ID: 7389f1 No. 13515 Anonymous
10th December 2015
Thursday 8:44 pm

ID: 7389f1
13515 Silly Sausage Thread
Ban appeals, supplication and fry-ups.
541 posts omitted. Last 50 posts shown. Expand all images.
>> ID: 1aa287 No. 15367 Anonymous
10th June 2020
Wednesday 3:33 pm

ID: 1aa287
15367 spacer
>>15362
Never thought I’d live to see the vapid pseudo-pedantry of the fake less/fewer distinction brought onto the shores of .gs. A sad day.
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 15368 Anonymous
10th June 2020
Wednesday 3:40 pm

ID: ec74d0
15368 spacer
>>15366
Comedy?
Granted, but it was the middle of the night.
>> ID: 09908d No. 15369 Anonymous
10th June 2020
Wednesday 6:25 pm

ID: 09908d
15369 spacer
>>15367

I, for one, got brought up for making that mistake on here about a decade ago. You obviously haven't been paying attention.
>> ID: 98805e No. 15380 Anonymous
27th June 2020
Saturday 2:44 pm

ID: 98805e
15380 spacer
Is posting a Sky News interview between Adam Bolton and a former Met chief superintendent really worthy of a two week ban for "racist shite"?
>> ID: 533c65 No. 15381 Anonymous
27th June 2020
Saturday 5:11 pm

ID: 533c65
15381 spacer
>>15380
"We can't have the Marxist BLM narrative, that this is an issue of right wing whites+police vs everyone else (when really it's a specific problem with afro-Carribbeans largely due to their massively disproportional rate of fatherlessness), being shattered by a calm rational former chief superintendent stating facts and his years of experience" said Adam Bolton and the mods.
>> ID: a1997b No. 15382 Anonymous
27th June 2020
Saturday 5:55 pm

ID: a1997b
15382 spacer
>>15381

>being shattered by a calm rational former chief superintendent stating facts

Fucking hell. Actually beyond parody now.
>> ID: 9372a2 No. 15383 Anonymous
27th June 2020
Saturday 6:01 pm

ID: 9372a2
15383 spacer
>>15382
I seem to have a thing at the moment where I just post something and then other people run with it, like using the word "nondescript".
>> ID: a1997b No. 15384 Anonymous
27th June 2020
Saturday 6:24 pm

ID: a1997b
15384 spacer
>>15383

We haven't had a good 'ubiquitous' in years, it's about time.
>> ID: 7e4fab No. 15457 Anonymous
28th July 2020
Tuesday 12:48 am

ID: 7e4fab
15457 spacer
Could the mod responsible explain why >>/news/26557 warranted a permaban? Not grousing, just puzzled.
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 15459 Anonymous
28th July 2020
Tuesday 9:16 am

ID: ec74d0
15459 spacer
>>15457
Pretty clear and direct reference to
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Alt-right_glossary#13.25
https://www.adl.org/education/references/hate-symbols/1352-1390
>> ID: e200b6 No. 15460 Anonymous
28th July 2020
Tuesday 9:51 am

ID: e200b6
15460 spacer
>>15459

On a tangent. Because it was perfectly fine for that reference. I hate that site. I find being subjective without any awareness of it to be the height of obnoxious. And it isn't just a I don't like the tone of it, it frequently favours post modernist views over those of science, which violates the very name of the site.

It is the epitome of the fallacy of appeal to authority.
>> ID: 6c0fdd No. 15461 Anonymous
28th July 2020
Tuesday 9:57 am

ID: 6c0fdd
15461 spacer
>>15460
>subjective without any awareness of it
>frequently favours post modernist views over those of science
I don't understand what you mean by the former (it seems to be well aware that it doesn't cover topics in a neutral way) and you'll need to post examples of what you mean of the latter. I am interested in hearing more but to keep this out of /shed/ maybe you could start a thread elsewhere about the problems with RationalWiki?
>> ID: e200b6 No. 15462 Anonymous
28th July 2020
Tuesday 11:36 am

ID: e200b6
15462 spacer
>>15461

>maybe you could start a thread elsewhere about the problems with RationalWiki?

I don't think it warrants that much discussion. I'll simply state its history as I understand it. It stated as a site for debunking American anti-intellectualism (things like creationism and anti-global warming positions) and has mutated to speak righteously about socially-left positions over time.

It does not follow that because one is wrong the other is wholly truth but that is now the stance of multiple articles and what the site is now.

>you'll need to post examples of what you mean of the latter
I don't frequent the site to give a clear example now, but the 'health at every size' article previously has been an anti-scientific mess, talking about doctors as being fat-phobic for telling people about the health risks of their lifestyle. Now it takes a more cowardly middle ground describing it simply as a movement with some good points and bad rather than wholly favourable. It still has the air of equivocation about it lines like "There's considerable debate about how dangerous it is to be obese".

I hope this doesn’t spill into a long tangent I just wanted to explain what you inquired about.
>> ID: 6c0fdd No. 15464 Anonymous
28th July 2020
Tuesday 12:01 pm

ID: 6c0fdd
15464 spacer
>>15462
Looking at the history of that article it seems like the converse has true - while the article as of this year does take a more nuanced view of the movement, in the past it has been unequivocal about HAES being flatly pseudoscience.
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 15465 Anonymous
28th July 2020
Tuesday 12:03 pm

ID: ec74d0
15465 spacer
>>15460
Yes, they were just one of the results that came up when I was searching for a reference to explain.
>> ID: e1c939 No. 15466 Anonymous
28th July 2020
Tuesday 12:10 pm

ID: e1c939
15466 spacer
Is The Guardian an alt-right hate site now?

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/mar/11/gypsies-roma-travellers-over-represented-jails-england-wales-prisons

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: e200b6 No. 15467 Anonymous
28th July 2020
Tuesday 12:30 pm

ID: e200b6
15467 spacer
>>15464

As I said I hadn't looked at the site for a long time it could have changed at different times with edit wars.

>>15465

I suspected something like that.
>> ID: 06e219 No. 15480 Anonymous
3rd August 2020
Monday 2:29 am

ID: 06e219
15480 spacer
Lads, not sure what happened. Website was dead for a long while, and now I seem to be banned for something heinous.

It say I was banned for "Transparently telling someone where to to find child abuse >>/eco/2821" in March 31st 2020. Now I probably post 3 times a year. I'm a massive lurker, so I am 100% sure I'm not a paedo, since I like redheads with big tits. I would appreciate it if one of the techy lads could explain what happened here. I am really confused. How did this happen? Can this be rescinded?

Apologies for the inconvenience. I mostly post about my dreams and I wanted to share one I just had.
>> ID: 4697c6 No. 15481 Anonymous
3rd August 2020
Monday 2:51 am

ID: 4697c6
15481 spacer
>>15480
You probably accidentally ended up reusing an old IP address that was banned. We have a very very long list of bans now, I am actively removing many of them, because I have been tripping over the same thing now.
>> ID: 4697c6 No. 15482 Anonymous
3rd August 2020
Monday 2:53 am

ID: 4697c6
15482 spacer
>>15480
Have removed that one.
>> ID: 5c556b No. 15483 Anonymous
3rd August 2020
Monday 3:29 am

ID: 5c556b
15483 spacer
>>15481
>>15482
Thank you.

How does that happen? I thought that if you have the same IP address (static?), then you would be using the same one for life. Is that not the case?

Anyway, thanks.
>> ID: 33a0e6 No. 15484 Anonymous
3rd August 2020
Monday 4:27 am

ID: 33a0e6
15484 spacer
>>15483
That'll only happen if you're specifically paying for a static IP address, and many ISPs just won't offer that option in the first place. Some will give you the same address as long as your device is up, but it won't be guaranteed static.
>> ID: 6c0fdd No. 15485 Anonymous
3rd August 2020
Monday 9:24 am

ID: 6c0fdd
15485 spacer
>>15480
I vaguely remember this thread and think I might have even been the recipient of the ban. As you can see from the thread it's not as bad as the ban message implies, the lads were discussing what amounts to a small pencil sketch no more lascivious than a pin-up girl, the mods are just (understandably) overcautious.
>> ID: 70bf53 No. 15486 Anonymous
5th August 2020
Wednesday 6:40 pm

ID: 70bf53
15486 spacer
Why do i keep getting banned for conspiracy nonsense? I put it on the right board this time!
>> ID: 7492ee No. 15487 Anonymous
5th August 2020
Wednesday 6:46 pm

ID: 7492ee
15487 spacer
>>15486
I thought it was a shite thread but he's got a point. It was on the conspiracy board, I don't expect everything there to be of the highest quality.
>> ID: 4697c6 No. 15488 Anonymous
5th August 2020
Wednesday 7:01 pm

ID: 4697c6
15488 spacer
>>15486
Because there was already a thread about it and you were spouting fucking nonsense. Also, learn to spell Lebanon.
>> ID: d10218 No. 15511 Anonymous
21st August 2020
Friday 9:09 pm

ID: d10218
15511 spacer
Sorry, mods. I didn't realise that posting in a thread that's fallen off the first page of /b/ was worthy of a lifetime ban, even if my 'bump' was saged and I only did it because another thread (>>/lab/4826) had jogged my memory of it.
>> ID: ae503f No. 15512 Anonymous
21st August 2020
Friday 9:20 pm

ID: ae503f
15512 spacer
>>15511

Whinging is a double ban.
>> ID: e200b6 No. 15513 Anonymous
21st August 2020
Friday 11:39 pm

ID: e200b6
15513 spacer
>>15512

2 lifetime bans is only one lifetime with good behaviour.
>> ID: d4104e No. 15514 Anonymous
22nd August 2020
Saturday 4:50 pm

ID: d4104e
15514 spacer
>>15511
You call that supplication? pfft. I might have perma-banned you by accident tbh. I rarely give out bans longer than 24hrs unless it's spam. I'll remove for time served.
>> ID: d4104e No. 15515 Anonymous
22nd August 2020
Saturday 4:52 pm

ID: d4104e
15515 spacer
>>15514
Someone beat me to it.
>> ID: 60396b No. 15516 Anonymous
27th August 2020
Thursday 2:54 pm

ID: 60396b
15516 spacer
I wasn't going to say anything, but yesterday I tried to post and I'd been banned for so long I'd forgotten the expiry date so the post went down the memory hole. I wouldn't have minded much if I'd threatened to kill someone or advocated for some manner of daft militant wogic action, but I didn't. What I did was pretend to be an MP and say "dw", again, while pretending to be an MP, which led to me being banned for a whole week and being told to "take an English class" (a distinctly American phrasing in my opinion but that's neither here nor there). The use of "dw" instead of "don't worry" was a deliberate linguistic decision to even more clearly show the unseriousness of my fictional Tory MP, this should have been very obvious to anyone who read it, assuming they'd ever attended an English class.

Also here's a mod saying "tbh" >>15514 so what exactly are the rules? If I'd said "imo" earlier in this post would I have been banned again? What about "ITT"? I really wasn't arsed until I tried to post last night and realised that the length of the ban over something so stupid was longer than my ability to remember I was banned, it's just so daft that I can't help but be irked by it.
>> ID: 99a328 No. 15517 Anonymous
27th August 2020
Thursday 3:00 pm

ID: 99a328
15517 spacer
>>15516

I think I have been banned here more for using unappreciated literary devices than I have ever been for being a knob head.

I resent it most for stifling creativity.
>> ID: bdfd82 No. 15518 Anonymous
27th August 2020
Thursday 3:46 pm

ID: bdfd82
15518 spacer
>>15516
>what exactly are the rules

hahahaha.
>> ID: a491ed No. 15519 Anonymous
27th August 2020
Thursday 4:10 pm

ID: a491ed
15519 spacer
>>15516
..How long have you been here, lad?
>> ID: 60396b No. 15520 Anonymous
27th August 2020
Thursday 4:41 pm

ID: 60396b
15520 spacer
>>15519
Plenty long enough to have had joke bans, but they aren't usually a week and accompanied by the kind of comment that makes it sound like modlad just lost an argument with modmissus and is feeling passive aggressive.
>> ID: 74c3f2 No. 15521 Anonymous
27th August 2020
Thursday 5:44 pm

ID: 74c3f2
15521 spacer
>>15519
This attitude of 'everyone who gets banned is just a whinging cunt and deserves ridicule' is getting really tedious, teenlad. If you're a mod just unban him, I think everyone can do without the back-and-forth.
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 15522 Anonymous
27th August 2020
Thursday 7:24 pm

ID: ec74d0
15522 spacer
>>15521
I don't know if it expired or was removed but there was no such ban in the list at around 3pm.
>> ID: 3545e3 No. 15523 Anonymous
27th August 2020
Thursday 9:21 pm

ID: 3545e3
15523 spacer
>>15522
Yeah, I did check around that time too. I don't remember seeing that ban yesterday either.
>> ID: 487591 No. 15547 Anonymous
26th September 2020
Saturday 11:43 pm

ID: 487591
15547 spacer
Banned for two weeks for 'numerous reasons' for an emo post. Could you please expand on the reasons, so that I have something to reflect upon whilst serving my punishment.
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 15548 Anonymous
27th September 2020
Sunday 8:53 am

ID: ec74d0
15548 spacer
>>15547
Do you not remember the content or formatting of your own post?
>> ID: 66faf5 No. 15549 Anonymous
27th September 2020
Sunday 9:32 am

ID: 66faf5
15549 spacer
>>15548

I don't remember it being ban worthy.
>> ID: ec74d0 No. 15550 Anonymous
27th September 2020
Sunday 9:34 am

ID: ec74d0
15550 spacer

Numerous reasons.png
155501555015550
>>15549

Really?
>> ID: a7556e No. 15551 Anonymous
27th September 2020
Sunday 11:25 am

ID: a7556e
15551 spacer
>>15549
Being a psuedo-psych misogynist? On /emo/? Mate...
>> ID: af2d61 No. 15554 Anonymous
27th September 2020
Sunday 1:30 pm

ID: af2d61
15554 spacer
>>15550

As the guy he was responding to I don't see anything particularly harmful about this post. It was all in the context of me/my partner's personal sexual fantasy, not a social commentary. He didn't say anything I'd particularly even disagree with- He's right that these lizard brain primal desires do need at least paying lip service to keep yourself truly happy.

I don't think the bedroom is any place for politics and that has been the viewpoint of the many fisherfolk types I've talked to from the kink scene- If you start overanalysing the stuff that makes your naughty bits tingle because you read some Dworkin or what have you, you're inevitably only going to spoil it for yourself.

But I digress. He doesn't seem to want to contest the ban so badly anyhow.
>> ID: 723b50 No. 15555 Anonymous
27th September 2020
Sunday 3:20 pm

ID: 723b50
15555 spacer
>>15551
>psuedo

Lad.
>> ID: 28a9d9 No. 15556 Anonymous
27th September 2020
Sunday 3:45 pm

ID: 28a9d9
15556 spacer

tumblr_inline_o0id4lKsk31qz6g9k_1280.jpg
155561555615556
>>15554

>He doesn't seem to want to contest the ban so badly anyhow

I was banned for 'ban evasion' for asking why I was banned. So I was hardly in a position to argue my defence.

If you hadn't turned up to argue my defence I would have just walked away as no one seemed amiable to even telling me what the problem was only banning me for asking.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: 70b017 No. 15561 Anonymous
16th October 2020
Friday 1:10 pm

ID: 70b017
15561 spacer
"using sentry to stalk other users"

Excuse me but what? It wasn't hard to guess I was talking to the same lad, there's only three of us after all.
>> ID: c2a5ac No. 15562 Anonymous
21st October 2020
Wednesday 8:24 am

ID: c2a5ac
15562 spacer
Sometimes I don't understand this place. Taking the piss out of someone for being an edgelord saying they'll break the nose of the next person they say not wearing a mask properly results in a ban and the post being deleted.

However, making a ridiculously low quality thread on /b/ about the news story of someone getting their wife to film them fuck chickens, using a NY Post link that is based on an article from The Sun, when we definitely discussed this back in August when he plead guilty is apparently fine.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/husband-admits-having-sex-chickens-22453075
>> ID: 3005fd No. 15563 Anonymous
22nd October 2020
Thursday 7:11 am

ID: 3005fd
15563 spacer

caprice-des-dieux.jpg
155631556315563
>>15562

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password