- Files: GIF, JPG, PNG, Maximum:4000 KB, Thumbnails: 600x600 pixels
- Currently 1304 unique user posts. View catalogue
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ First 100 posts ] [ Last 50 posts ]
Posting mode: Reply [Last 50 posts][ Reply ]
721 posts omitted. Last 50 posts shown.
Expand all images.
|>>|| No. 15797
>Why is one of you being a tin foil fruit cake.
I'm afraid you're going to have to narrow this down, mate. I wear tin foil pants to protect my balls from zog beams.
|>>|| No. 15798
I haven't had fruit cake in ages. A nice moist genoa is what I need right now.
|>>|| No. 15799
That I already knew but I assume only one of you auntie fuckers yesterday was informed by the little man living in you ear that a normal debating post was actually a chocolate pancake dog whistle and acted on that to give a year long ban.
|>>|| No. 15801
Of course not I would never say a mod was mad or ever question the divine pure wisdom of the mods who decided our fates and are incapable of error. But perhaps the little man living in his ear was misinformed or misheard something over the sound of crinkling tin foil upon the mods head and mislead the mod during the relaying of information. And perhaps the mods could show mercy on the human world just this once, not as a admission of error but as a sign of their divine and infinite kindness.
(A good day to you Sir!)
|>>|| No. 15802
Is it silly buggers week? That /pol/ thread shows you've got a lot of pent up frustration to release. Is the heat still making you lads cranky?
|>>|| No. 15803
I know I got banned for being an abrasive ne'erdowell, which was fair enough. Not sure what >>15796 refers to though.
|>>|| No. 15804
With access to two active moderators via DM, you chose to throw a teary and be passive aggressive on here rather than discuss this with someone who might be able to do something about it, in a more casual, some might say even friendly, environment?
Then you threw another wobbler on Discord about being banned on here, like we've been two faced or something by being your friend when there is no way to know who you are, and left. Nor did you make your feelings clear earlier, despite obviously not caring much about anonymity in making that post.
When you're done being self-righteous, we can talk. Then the mods will talk to each other about it to see if we were wrong, because moderation policy is set by consensus. One of those consensus policies is banning things people report to us if we agree it seems a bit dodgy, but maybe that's too vague. purps has been clear he doesn't want what people post here to be too restrictive, but some things are against the rules. We wont know unless you reach out in a constructive way instead of having a teary about it.
|>>|| No. 15807
Fine last post since you provoked a response.
>We wont know unless you reach out in a constructive way instead of having a teary about it.
I have seen every method of constructive criticism or inquiry attempted over the years and it has been met with "aw you having a teary" so don't gas light me now you cunt.
If you had any respect for me, or intent of resolving this you would have DM'd me directly or leave be instead since you obviously know who I am. Instead you have chosen to make this weird, hiding under the thin veneer of anonymity whilst publicly shaming and suggesting I should grovel to come back.. after I said I was leaving. you have chosen to make this a circus for all to see now and sneer at, you chose that to make this into a humiliation. maybe next time someone says they are leaving you shouldn't share the dirty laundry here and they might not know they are right to leave. If you have any spine left you won't just delete this post like so many other critical posts in the past
|>>|| No. 15808
I'm glad I don't associate with any of you outside of this website. Fucking clown shoes.
|>>|| No. 15809
You can't DM people you're not in a server with, I know this because I tried to DM you but you'd already left the server in a strop and the discord bot thing told me no. Then I sent you a friend request, which went ignored.
Ultimately, you can have just left without saying anything at all. Literally no one has mentioned grovelling apart from you, so I don't really know how to approach that, but except to reiterate that if you'd said literally anything this probably wouldn't be happening. .gs isn't a private server, you ensured anyone who uses it would be able to see what you posted when YOU posted it. I just screen shotted it so the mod who banned you could have a complete picture when deciding to unban you or not.
I'm still perfectly willing to talk to you about it.
|>>|| No. 15810
You've seen /emo/ before I assume? Let's not pretend that we're all bastions of stability. Most of us have had a bit of a breakdown over something trivial at some point, it's usually because there are bigger things or we've not had respite.
|>>|| No. 15811
I suspect I'm dealing with the mod who deletes his own posts when it's pointed out to him to stop doubling down if he's in the wrong because it only makes him look worse, but I don't see why >>/pol/94144 warrants a 12 month ban whatsoever.
It's not "bringing race into it" when the government's own report is comparing poor white children with poor non-white children, particularly as the headlines are focusing on the recommendations within the report to avoid use of the term "white privilege", but my point all along has been that race isn't a significant factor and other things such as geographical location are far more influential.
|>>|| No. 15813
So it's a 12 month ban because I hurt a mods feelings for telling them to use their brain and think when they didn't understand something because they were too busy being a kneejerking reactionary?
(A good day to you Sir!)
|>>|| No. 15815
Knowing when you've won is as important as know when you're beaten.
|>>|| No. 15816
In all fairness I'm actually legitimately a bit ashamed of what I posted, as it was a crass, unimaginative attempt at inflicting offence. This poster was at least trying to drive at a cogent point, albeit with the savoir faire of a eejit.
This ban is jokes though, top .gs
|>>|| No. 15817
I made a post in the >>/pol/94144 thread which was eaten a moment ago (mistakenly, if I may dare to suggest?). Not the map picture, but shortly after it.
Slightly peeved, whinge ticked.
|>>|| No. 15821
I wouldn't have minded nearly as much if it didn't take me about 10 minutes to type and re-type those few sentences. Fuck knows how the longpostlads manage it.
|>>|| No. 15871
Who was it who was saying that the people posting pictures of that German anti-climate activist were doing so for legitimate reasons? Never mind, I don't care. Same user posted this.
|>>|| No. 15872
It feels like it's been a while since we've had posts claiming it's scientifically proven that 14 is the optimum age for giving birth.
|>>|| No. 15873
I would imagine by this stage it's difficult for pedolad to find IPs where he isn't already banned.
|>>|| No. 15874
I am the first of the two posters banned for antiSomali sentiment. I didn't intend to be racist, I thought was on the level of "Americans are fat" or "Germans are scat fetishists", but I appreciate it veered more into the area of dolphin rape so I am sorry.
|>>|| No. 15875
>Somalis look like aliens they have big craniums and weak jaws, very skinny, disproportionately large head. They look very different from your Nigerians and your Jamaicans.
Seems a little racist to me, chief.
|>>|| No. 15876
It's only racist because you know Somalians are black. If he'd been talking about people from Wrexham or the Welsh in general, we'd all be fine with it. No double standards here, chief.>>15875
|>>|| No. 15877
>... or the Welsh in general, we'd all be fine with it
I am Welsh. I disagree.
Speaking of which, some cretin has gotten themselves banned from 3 of the 4 Opera VPNs available to me. Please don't nuke the last one, .gs is one of my very few connections to the land of my fathers.
|>>|| No. 15882
I got banned for a year for being a penis mutilator because I asked for advice about my second degree burns I got on my arm from getting something out of the oven. Please unban me, I've never mutilated my cock.
|>>|| No. 15884
Even if it was cock abuse lad, I don't think he should be banned during a medical emergency. As an imageboard we ought to be judged by how we treat how most completely bonkers users.
|>>|| No. 15894
I'm banned for two weeks but the post was deleted and I can't work out what it was. Was I winding up ecolads too much?
And I can't post images on shed anymore.
|>>|| No. 15895
We're heading into slippery slope territory. If someone can get a ban for finding Priti Patel sexually attractive then you're going to end up banning 90% of the userbase because everyone here has got very weird perversions.
(A good day to you Sir!)
|>>|| No. 15896
First they came for the Patel posters, and I did not speak out-
Because I am not into hatefucking.
Then they came for the Millican posters, and I did not speak out-
Because I am not a chubby chaser.
Then they came for the Vorderman posters, and I did not speak out-
Because I am not into excessive plastic surgery.
Then they came for me-
And there was no one left to speak for me.
|>>|| No. 15897
I agree. If you can't subvert a thread discussing something a woman has done by making lewd comments about said woman, then this is the beginning of the end for Britain's preeminant discussion forum, and I won't be renewing my membership.
Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells
|>>|| No. 15898
This isn't quite what this thread is for, but I was trying to post from the cinema (the film hadn't started, I'm not a monster) the other week, but I was perma-banned, so I was wondering, did one of you lot work in a cinema at some point? Or was it some kind of "range ban" which I don't really understand, but whatever.
|>>|| No. 15904
I don't know if I'm misusing Opera or what, but some nugget got themselves banned from every VPN on that browser in 2020 and I still find myself running into it. IP is 188.8.131.52.
Any chance this could be lifted?
|>>|| No. 15905
All of the bans that are coming from that range are for spam of some description, couple of virus links, that sort of thing. The range itself isn't banned, but 15 of Opera's proxies (presumably) are banned as a result of whatever knob was using them to avoid getting a ban on their home range, so I'm not really inclined to start unbanning them.
I use NordVPN and haven't had a single bit of trouble with .gs, it's mostly free public proxies that people struggle with and the aforementioned behaviour is usually why.
|>>|| No. 15929
I was banned for a year about a year ago. I'm still getting used to the novelty of being able to post without opening a different browser.
I'm homeless for the next week and staying on random sofas so good fucking luck brian, can't ban me lad.
|>>|| No. 15930
What did you do that was so bad it warranted a 12 month ban? I don't think it takes much.
|>>|| No. 15931
Well, it ended up that I said something about another banned poster to the effect of 'What that person said is fine because it made me laugh' and then the delicate mod banned me with 'Well banning you made me laugh so it's ok' or something.
I'm just happy that they agreed with me.
|>>|| No. 15932
I know it's only a one-hour ban, but it seems unfair to fall foul of a banned link filter just because you wanted to tease someone.
I mean, what happens if you want to take the piss out of a libertarian loon for invoking medieval common law (which has been legislated into oblivion anyway)? Or if the Appleby Magna massive want to big themselves up by extending some vowels? Because Brian never learned regex, THEY CANNOT.
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ First 100 posts ] [ Last 50 posts ]