[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
women

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply [Last 50 posts]
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 19373)
Message
File  []
close
File
removed
>> No. 19373 Anonymous
2nd March 2011
Wednesday 7:12 pm
19373 free thread.
I just wanted an excuse to post her. So then I thought-

ITT ANYTHING YOU WANT.

i.e. images you couldn't think to categorise in another thread but really want more people to see.
1613 posts omitted. Last 50 posts shown. Expand all images.
>> No. 41945 Anonymous
8th January 2021
Friday 8:31 pm
41945 spacer
>>41941

As someone else in the thread said, we don't make the law, you're welcome to froth at the absurdity of the law but not our attempts to comply with it.

It's very telling that people are this angry about whether we've been TOO strict on the definition of CP - and you wonder why the moderation is so sensitive to it? We learned a long time not to let these sorts of people think they have a home here.
>> No. 41946 Anonymous
8th January 2021
Friday 9:37 pm
41946 spacer
Hate to add to this quarrel but Taylor Momsen's 18th birthday was in July of 2011, that is to say several months after this thread was first posted, meaning the oldest she can possibly be in OP's pic is 17.

Sorry lads, just being a good citizen.
>> No. 41947 Anonymous
8th January 2021
Friday 10:02 pm
41947 spacer
>>41946
Are you serious?
>> No. 41948 Anonymous
8th January 2021
Friday 10:07 pm
41948 spacer
>>41947
Yes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_Momsen
>> No. 41949 Anonymous
8th January 2021
Friday 10:27 pm
41949 spacer
Thanks mods. Sorry to be a party-pooper to everyone else.
>> No. 41950 Anonymous
8th January 2021
Friday 11:02 pm
41950 spacer
>>41949
I would pay you to go through all pictures on this board, and flag all the underage ones.

Just would like to point out that this lad >>19387 is a nonce.
>> No. 41951 Anonymous
8th January 2021
Friday 11:05 pm
41951 spacer
>>41950
>I would pay you to go through all pictures on this board, and flag all the underage ones.

What makes you think I'm an expert as opposed to just a fan of Taylor's music?
>> No. 41952 Anonymous
8th January 2021
Friday 11:30 pm
41952 spacer

Zsanett tormay.jpg
419524195241952
I'm going to suggest something controversial in that we post porn.

>>41946
To think, all this time and it was really us who were the pedolads.
>> No. 41953 Anonymous
9th January 2021
Saturday 12:13 pm
41953 spacer

Taylor_Momsen_Pretty_Reckless_.jpg
419534195341953
A more acceptable photo of Taylor Momsen.
>> No. 41954 Anonymous
9th January 2021
Saturday 10:10 pm
41954 spacer
>>41953
voted for as the new first image, if the mods can do that. It'd be a shame to lay bare such an iconic thread as this. Almost 10 years of tradition.
>> No. 41955 Anonymous
9th January 2021
Saturday 10:29 pm
41955 spacer
>>41953

Cor I'd taylor her momsen
>> No. 41956 Anonymous
9th January 2021
Saturday 11:30 pm
41956 spacer
>>41954
Not to labour the point but the fact that there was a child (in the mods' words) pictured at the top of this porn thread for ten fucking years and no-one batted an eye or heard from the rozzers in that time I feel backs up my point about 'the law argument' being somewhat pants.
>> No. 41957 Anonymous
9th January 2021
Saturday 11:39 pm
41957 spacer
>>41956
It doesn't.
>> No. 41959 Anonymous
10th January 2021
Sunday 12:17 am
41959 spacer
>>41956

Mate you've got to stop your teary at some point, it's been days.
>> No. 41960 Anonymous
10th January 2021
Sunday 1:04 am
41960 spacer
>>41956
You are labouring the point, and you're wrong. Shut the fuck up.
>> No. 41961 Anonymous
10th January 2021
Sunday 10:52 am
41961 spacer

File
removed
Michael Gove's daughter.
>> No. 41962 Anonymous
10th January 2021
Sunday 11:04 am
41962 spacer
>>41961
She looks very... dusty? How strange.
>> No. 41963 Anonymous
10th January 2021
Sunday 11:09 am
41963 spacer
>>41962
it's just white cat fur on a dark top.
>> No. 41964 Anonymous
10th January 2021
Sunday 12:30 pm
41964 spacer
>>41961

Can someone confirm her DoB, because I want to post a link to her TikTok but I don't want to get banned.
>> No. 41965 Anonymous
10th January 2021
Sunday 12:45 pm
41965 spacer
>>41964
17 at the moment.
>> No. 41966 Anonymous
10th January 2021
Sunday 12:50 pm
41966 spacer
>>41965

OH DEAR, >>41961.
>> No. 41967 Anonymous
10th January 2021
Sunday 8:58 pm
41967 spacer
I've never researched this because I'm not a nonce, so is it illegal or something to host pictures of a 17 year-old on a thread like this? Aren't they above the age of consent? I'd never thought about the age of the OP pic and wouldn't have guessed she was underage.
>> No. 41968 Anonymous
10th January 2021
Sunday 9:02 pm
41968 spacer
>>41967
>implying whoever can respond is a nonce.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 41969 Anonymous
10th January 2021
Sunday 9:47 pm
41969 spacer
>>41968
No, I just assume someone who runs an imageboard would research these things. And is also a nonce.
>> No. 41970 Anonymous
10th January 2021
Sunday 9:49 pm
41970 spacer
>>41967

British law is sufficiently broad that almost any image of a child can be considered indecent if someone is perving over it. On one level it makes sense - there's something obviously unsavoury about having a load of pictures of kids if they're not your kids - but it's also slightly Kafkaesque. The mods have no choice but to be extremely cautious.
>> No. 41971 Anonymous
10th January 2021
Sunday 9:51 pm
41971 spacer
>>41970

I should say that I'm not a carpet-bagger, I just work in IT.

That hasn't really helped my case, has it?
>> No. 41972 Anonymous
10th January 2021
Sunday 10:22 pm
41972 spacer
>>41967
16 for sex, 18 for porn. You may remember that page 3 girls used to be 16 up until...sometime between the late-90s and mid-00s when they last changed around the sex offences.

My excuse is that I did law degree for moments just like these.
>> No. 41973 Anonymous
10th January 2021
Sunday 10:42 pm
41973 spacer
>>41967

The law is 16 for shagging, but 18 for porn, as I'm sure we all know. But the law on 'exploitative sexual images' is broad enough that any image of someone underage can be classed as exploitative in the right context, and posting it on a board designated for porn fits right in that category.

It's a very real thing and people really do report you to the feds for it - it doesn't happen often here (largely because of our currently discussed 'overmoderation'), but whenever it does it's usually for an image that absolutely nobody thought was sexual, but it's a child so the choice is delete it or get booted off our hosting service.

It's definitely an odd law when tested to its extremes (labelled stick figures and so on) but it's not up to us to challenge the letter of the law, not if we want the site to remain alive, anyway.

My excuse is that I moderate a website with occasional peado encroachers, which I understand is probably not a great alibi.
>> No. 42066 Anonymous
19th April 2021
Monday 10:20 pm
42066 spacer

f3jli7vsyxq61.jpg
420664206642066

>> No. 42071 Anonymous
2nd May 2021
Sunday 8:51 pm
42071 spacer
>>42066
Whats going on here then?
>> No. 42072 Anonymous
2nd May 2021
Sunday 9:49 pm
42072 spacer

June_Cover_Crop%20.jpg
420724207242072
Billie Elish has been dressing up for Vogue.

Fuck. Me.
>> No. 42073 Anonymous
2nd May 2021
Sunday 9:56 pm
42073 spacer
>>42072
Meh. The faces and figures that looked good in those clothes aren't like hers. Lamb dressed up as young mutton. The opposite's true too, she looks better in what she normally wears.
>> No. 42074 Anonymous
2nd May 2021
Sunday 10:04 pm
42074 spacer
>>42071

Porcelain bint with blue paint on her nips and strudel hair with a cheeky hint of jacky danny.
>> No. 42075 Anonymous
2nd May 2021
Sunday 10:11 pm
42075 spacer
>>42073

You know it's all about her tits. Fuck the MSM, young girls should have positive role models like Ronda Rousey. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoUbQxvDVs
>> No. 42076 Anonymous
2nd May 2021
Sunday 10:24 pm
42076 spacer

Untitled.jpg
420764207642076
>>42073
>The opposite's true too, she looks better in what she normally wears

Sorry lads. I think I would like a go on that, it looks weird on her but what she normally wears is considerably worse and hides her figure.
>> No. 42077 Anonymous
2nd May 2021
Sunday 10:28 pm
42077 spacer
>>42076
That makes her look as though she's an overstuffed cloth mannequin with poorly-hidden seams.
>> No. 42078 Anonymous
3rd May 2021
Monday 7:39 am
42078 spacer
>>42072>>42076

Serious question. Why does she always look like she is half baked and has been dragged to a boring event by her parents. Has she had a stroke? She has the worst resting bitch face I've ever seen
>> No. 42079 Anonymous
3rd May 2021
Monday 1:58 pm
42079 spacer

krystal-boyd-the-red-fox-little-caprice-keira-fox-.jpg
420794207942079
Ah to be rich.
https://spankbang.com/f4fc-35hfc6/playlist/full+scenes

>>42078
As far as I can tell, that's what kids these days are all about.

They approach cool in a reality where you're constantly in the public view rather than it being a novelty. The idea of cool isn't to be on tv like us, because everyone is on tv now, it's to be ambivalent or even vaguely dismissive of being on camera. That and Billie Eilish has a butter face.
>> No. 42080 Anonymous
3rd May 2021
Monday 11:42 pm
42080 spacer

billie-eilish-yeezy-slides-normalize-bodies-embed.jpg
420804208042080
>>42076
Considering how doctored most Vogue photo shoots are, along with the lingerie she's wearing to hold everything in she doesn't quite look like that in real life.

Weirdly even this photo it looks like she is holding her stomach in a bit. If it wasn't for the green hair she could be any woman from a council estate going to do her shopping in Asda. She isn't anything special looks wise.
>> No. 42081 Anonymous
4th May 2021
Tuesday 12:07 am
42081 spacer
It's getting a bit "pointy elbows, would not bang" in here.
>> No. 42082 Anonymous
4th May 2021
Tuesday 1:19 am
42082 spacer
>>42081

I get it lad you have no standards you make this point everytime people aren't thirsty for someone overweight I am getting tired of hearing it.
>> No. 42083 Anonymous
4th May 2021
Tuesday 2:12 am
42083 spacer
>>42082

You thin fetishists are so touchy.
>> No. 42084 Anonymous
4th May 2021
Tuesday 2:54 am
42084 spacer
>>42082

Eyelash isn't even fat, she's just not thin. Perfectly within the normal bounds if you ask me. That's just the thing though, everything about her is completely normal. Totally average. Unremarkable in the extreme. She's got some hefty jugs, but it's not like it helps, they're like a body kit on an '04 Astra.

Maybe that's meant to be her appeal in an age of manufactured supermodel popstars? Are people sufficiently disconnected from real life nowadays that having a normal looking pop star counts as exotic appeal?
>> No. 42086 Anonymous
4th May 2021
Tuesday 4:11 am
42086 spacer
>>42084

I don't see why someone needs to be exceptionally attractive for me to ogle their big milkers.

Also I'm pretty sure that she's famous because of her remarkable talent.
>> No. 42087 Anonymous
4th May 2021
Tuesday 4:50 am
42087 spacer
>>42086
Remarkable talent, and having rich parents with existing connections in the music industry.
>> No. 42088 Anonymous
4th May 2021
Tuesday 5:08 am
42088 spacer
>>42084

I can still get the horn over bang average, I've been in relationships with plenty of average women. Personally I think Eilish is reasonably attractive even in none makeup form, but different strokes and all that, there's no sense arguing over how shaggable someone is in the wanky threaad.
>> No. 42089 Anonymous
4th May 2021
Tuesday 5:14 am
42089 spacer
>>42087

Pretty sure it's just the latter two m8, her brother does all the songwriting if I'm not mistaken.

Not like that's unusual in pop mind, it's pretty common for them to be more of a performer than an artist. It's a bit annoying how most people don't seem to draw a distinction though.
>> No. 42090 Anonymous
4th May 2021
Tuesday 8:27 am
42090 spacer
>>42084

She is normal but it is normal for a person to be overweight.

>>42086

I imagine not because you clearly have an udder obsession.
>> No. 42091 Anonymous
4th May 2021
Tuesday 8:33 am
42091 spacer
When I said that thing about "pointy elbows" last night I didn't mean to imply that you should stay up all night arguing about whether or not her elbows are, in fact, too pointy. Apologies for the mix up.
>> No. 42092 Anonymous
4th May 2021
Tuesday 9:28 am
42092 spacer
>>42091
I have no opinions on her elbows but the picture in >>42080 does make her look strangely top-heavy. She's not overweight but none of her body fat seems to be distributed south of her tummy.

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password