- Files: GIF, JPG, PNG, Maximum:5000 KB, Thumbnails: 600x600 pixels
- Currently 2483 unique user posts. View catalogue
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ First 100 posts ] [ Last 50 posts ]
Posting mode: Reply[ Reply ]
Expand all images.
|>>|| No. 19373
I just wanted an excuse to post her. So then I thought-
ITT ANYTHING YOU WANT.
i.e. images you couldn't think to categorise in another thread but really want more people to see.
|>>|| No. 19375
Nice. Today I saw a fine lass on the route to work. Usually she's dressed looking normal with a coat and so on. Today she was amazing. Gorgeous midriff on show. It was all I could do to not stare and drool. If I reckoned I had a chance and do it in an appropriate/non-intimidating/rapey vibe way I'd try my luck.
|>>|| No. 19376
I felt like sharing this. Ahem.
Partly because of the unusual and eye-catching wear of the OP's photo reminded me of it. My journeys could do with more eye-candy like that.
|>>|| No. 19384
Aren't they full of paedos though? The website has a dodgy reputation from what I hear and have seen here.
|>>|| No. 19387
Her beauty intimidates me, I don't like it. Hasn't got shit on our Sophie though...
|>>|| No. 19388
Take some pictures for us? All you'd have to do is pretend you were on your phone. In fact if you have an slr you could "rest your hands" on the top of the camera shutter and surreptitiously press it a couple of times as the target walked past.
Now it's written down that is magnitudes creepier that it was in my head
|>>|| No. 19390
Most SLRs are far too noisy to use surreptitiously. If they don't hear the mirror slap they'll hear the lens focusing.
I suppose you could have a quiet USM lens, and use a body that allowed a permanent mirror lock-up setting. Or use a good old quiet rangefinder.
I'm not a pervert, I swear, I just like candid street photography
|>>|| No. 19393
I wouldn't want to disturb her. Maybe I'd take a tasteful pic or two if I could do it without upsetting her, but she'd likely see me and I doubt she'd appreciate it someone doing that...
|>>|| No. 19425
If you really wan't to look at it that way, she is gnawing her own shirt, albeit playfully, I still wouldn't trust that mouth with my John-Thomas. Why is it always the pretty ones?
|>>|| No. 19442
Love karlie montana - there's a video of her sitting on a glass table showing everything off which is one of my faves of all time!
Thought I'd post one of are queen...
|>>|| No. 19491
I saw the hottie again. Exchanged a shy glance.
I will procrastinate, dream and do nothing about it, no doubt.
|>>|| No. 19493
No, it's okay. I've got a weekly ticket for the bus.
Is what I'd probably say.
|>>|| No. 19494
I fully admit it and thoroughly enjoyed it. If I can't even admit that on an anonymous board then I'd be worried.
Still, the issue will be resolved soon enough. I'll not be taking the bus to work soon enough, I'll be "car pooling" with someone, so that crushes that idle dream.
|>>|| No. 19496
Tell someone one the bus I knocked one off to them? I'm sure that will go down well in court.
|>>|| No. 19497
People here were saying on this site that a lad merely talking to or hitting on a woman on a bus can come across as "rapey". Imagine boasting of your carnal pleasures...
The days when a lad might have gotten away with such brazen behaviour is long gone.
|>>|| No. 19498
You'd have to use more elegant language than that, maybe "I brought myself to climax at the mere memory of your arse" or something like that.
|>>|| No. 19499
She does have a cracking arse on her, mind. If only we were all poets at heart like you. You should be the Cyrano de Bergerac to my Christian de Neuvillette.
|>>|| No. 19500
Oh well, tomorrow will probably be the last time I see her, for a long while at the least. Maybe ever. I'll be sure to have a good gawp to fuel my lingering fantasies later. Ahem.
Shame I can't bump into her in a more socially acceptable situation for chat or get an excuse to talk.
|>>|| No. 19502
because you wouldn't hit that or because you're just shit at talking to women?
|>>|| No. 19508
Too right. If we were any good at that we wouldn't have gigabytes of porn.
|>>|| No. 19516
Well, I steeled myself to make a move on my public transport princess, but didn't get to see her today. Pity. Might not get to see her for some time or again at all.
Nice additions, lads.
|>>|| No. 19517
Oh, and last time I saw her she wore a flower in her hair. Lovely.
[less than three]
|>>|| No. 19518
check the expression on her face, she knows her cameltoe is showing but doesn't give a fuck. love it.
|>>|| No. 20113
>>20103 Is this not a bit creepy? Taking a picture of a girl crying on the train and posting it on a porn board?
|>>|| No. 20116
>>20114 Much less creepy - posting a picture of a girl hiding from a camera on a porn board.
|>>|| No. 20117
I see what your saying but why don't we put a pin on that for just now, yeah? She's fit tho, amirite?
|>>|| No. 20118
>>20117 All I can see is nice legs... in tights. I know all too well that tights can lie.
|>>|| No. 20587
Well yeah but I imagine I could attach a fleshlight with the end cut off to a couple of rods then to her stump.
Probably be the best handjob ever.
|>>|| No. 20596
Yeah, and she sort of reminds me of a girl I used to have a massive crush on.
|>>|| No. 20597
This is a total stab in the dark, but was your crush's name by any chance Caitlin?
|>>|| No. 20665
is there a term for the pose where the legs are make a sort of "M" shape as the thighs are spread? pic related.
|>>|| No. 20852
Had to check to make sure it was actually her.
Yeah, I've got that video bookmarked... I've been meaning to show it to a friend for almost a year... because it's funny.
|>>|| No. 20878
Girl here looks not unlike an ex of mine. Less shameful than fapping to actual pics, but still pretty bad, i know.
|>>|| No. 20880
It's okay, I do that too. Most of the porn I have is women who remind me of various exes.
|>>|| No. 20881
You've been tapping some grade A poon lad, want to put in a good word for me?
|>>|| No. 20886
I should've known that sounded too good to be original. Cheers for causing me to find the song. I like it a lot.
|>>|| No. 20933
>>20932 I was curious what onion.ib is, then I googled it and found nothing. So I googled harder. Now, despite not seeing anything illegal, I'm afraid google will think I've been looking for CP.
|>>|| No. 20936
It's that hidden wiki iirc, I was just wondering what the image had to do with it.
|>>|| No. 20940
It lists all the known pages in the deep web/tor no matter there legal status. I learned this when I investigated the deep web via google after the thread about it on here. I found a forum conversation about it on the nike forum of all places, with screenshots, including of the assassination market.
|>>|| No. 20941
>>20939 Oh wait, I thought you put IRC. Either way, I'm glad I had safe image search on when I was googling about for it in images figuring that onion.ib was possibly a funny ladies bending over in tights tag.
|>>|| No. 20944
The first result is the CP page off that chan if you search onion.ib and google actually has a functioning cache of the site, with all the links, although I doubt those would work without TOR. Not that I want to know, but I was surprised google could cache any such page.
So yeah, not a term I'll search again
|>>|| No. 20945
It's down now (I think), I had a poke about on tor the other week but didn't find anything of interest, I'm not a nonce mind.
I find deep web/darknet type stuff intriguing, but if I think about it nothing that would warrant lying so low would be of interest to me.
|>>|| No. 20994
Looks like one of the neighbour's daughters. I'll have a fap to that later.
|>>|| No. 20997
I humbly request the video this gif was made from. I need it for a, er, science paper I'm writing.
|>>|| No. 20999
I've got wind! Can you give me something?
Yes - here's a kite!
|>>|| No. 21343
I've been seeing a lot of this "I've shagged her" stuff lately, is this an inside joke or are you two just a pair of Cassanovas?
|>>|| No. 21512
Jesus fucking Christ what's the matter with her? She looks like a Barbie doll.
|>>|| No. 21514
So they DID have different tits back then. I knew it couldn't just be the clothes.
|>>|| No. 22096
I'm on a roll. Gonna continue with the pale hipster girls.
This is the lead vocalist from my favourite nugaze group : 3
I would pin her down and fuck her senseless iykwim : 3
|>>|| No. 22509
Taken during 'Occupy London Stock Exchange' protest outside St Paul's Cathedral two days ago. She's a big fan of peace, it would seem.
|>>|| No. 22871
>>22752 Would be far more attractive were it not for the big man foot in the picture.
|>>|| No. 22899
Sounds to me like you're wishing that there was a nice thick toxic load streaming towards your mouth and anus instead.
|>>|| No. 22913
You lads have damn good taste.
Thought you'd like to know.
|>>|| No. 22969
Just thinking about how long it took me to notice the gun makes me realise how easily a sexy assassin could kill me without any effort.
|>>|| No. 23010
I'd check that her oyster card had been validated if you know what I mean.
|>>|| No. 23696
I'm not sure if this situation calls for congratulations or commiseration. I suppose both.
|>>|| No. 23704
Shit. What happens now? deportation? execution? it was only the once I swear it!
|>>|| No. 23705
We've all taken ganders once in a while, but I've got the feeling you're a regular. You should go make a thread in /emo/, the chaps in there would sort you out in no time.
|>>|| No. 23847
I could be wrong, but it looks to me like a couple of lesbians going at it in their bedroom.
|>>|| No. 23877
Zoetica Ebb, used to be a SG now photographer only, there are (old) nude sets around somewhere on the Internet. You can get find them if you look hard enough, I unfortunately don't have them any more. Sorry.
|>>|| No. 23916
New Rocks are fucking stupid.
But that's a pretty lady so I'm conflicted.
|>>|| No. 23972
She is really annoying, but saying that I would leave her prolapsed and bleeding.
|>>|| No. 24010
To be honest, I think she would lose 90% of her appeal once naked. She is definitely pushup bra, makeup material. There is a picture of her naked floating around the other chan thats been around since her early days. Normally crops up once she gets a I WOULD FUCK THAT thread and puts people off.
Alot better looking girls who have nice perky tits instead of fat udders.
|>>|| No. 24011
This goes for many women on or off the internet. They have more weapons at their disposal than most men when it comes to enhancements. Make up can make a huge difference. Sometimes to the point of being hard to recognise at all.
I'm surprised you were able to spot and recognise the brand like that. Are you sure you shouldn't be on /y/?
|>>|| No. 24067
I think most chaps of a certain age will recognise them as the token goth girls always wore them. If you are older, or, perhaps younger, then you might not have encountered them, but for a specific age bracket saying New Rocks is much like saying flares or Adidas threestripe.
|>>|| No. 24231
I remember new rocks, there was always some clumsy bitch that would tread on my feet in the pub.
|>>|| No. 25152
came across this lovely lass on /iq/ a while back. you know she's a babe when she can look cute crawling inside of a dead horse like a tauntaun on planet hoth.
|>>|| No. 25154
>Maybe best not to post the rest of the horse set
I was hoping he would do precisely that.
|>>|| No. 25156
Not sure that 51 is extreme. 50 is close (she's tied up, but she seems happy about it), and I'd wager that 52 probably is.
|>>|| No. 25173
Come to think of it, now we're hosted in the US, does the extreme porn law matter? I suppose it's best not to have horse-gore-porn in our caches if possible.
|>>|| No. 25174
In light of the TV Shack incident, I'd be cautious over anything involving cross-border issues, particularly if Mr. Purple is himself in the UK. There is precedent that merely viewing the image completes the offence of "making" an unlawful image. (Adblock takes care of it for me on this machine.)
|>>|| No. 25175
People say things like this but have never actually read the law itself:
>"it portrays, in an explicit and realistic way, any of the following— (a) an act which threatens a person’s life, (b) an act which results, or is likely to result, in serious injury to a person’s anus, breasts or genitals, (c) an act which involves sexual interference with a human corpse, or (d) a person performing an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive),
So none of these images are extreme, even climbing naked into a dead horse is okay according to this definition as long as she doesn't fuck it.
|>>|| No. 25179
People say things like this but have never actually read the thread itself:
|>>|| No. 25180
More importantly, "borderline" is all the police and CPS need to make your life a misery.
|>>|| No. 25222
>People say things like this but have never actually read the thread itself:
In this case the definition is quite clear cut. I agree that such borderline cases do exist, but not for the images posted here.
|>>|| No. 25225
You're right, I really meant that those images are borderline-borderline. People often see some of one set of images so post the rest of some related ones, which could be a problem. But it's not yet and now probably won't become one.
|>>|| No. 25335
Truly, it is the worst type of goth.
You've got to wonder what type of person would willingly dress in putrid green.
|>>|| No. 25338
I love how you go it's not a type of goth then go on to mention the name of the sub-species. Cyber goths are just silly anyway, all that shit in their hair and they smell bad 95% of the time.
I am kind of fond of the more Edwardian goth look on lasses, then I'm a sucker for birds with black hair and pale skin, combine it with blue eyes full red lips.... sorry I just came
|>>|| No. 25339
I wish real life was more like this.
I've always loved goths, and been one at heart, but I could never be bothered going to all the effort. Jeans and a t-shirt is far easier and cheaper.
|>>|| No. 25351
I always find it funny how many of ther goths are more into their fashion than the scene surrounding it with the music. Having the goth scene evolve out of punk with Dave Vanion and then post punk stuff like Siouxsie Sioux, Bauhaus, Fields of Nephilim etc. Is a thing of the past with all these goths who only listen to shite like Lacuna Coil or Evanescance. You only have to go to Camden and see every fucking shop and stall selling "goth" clothing like New Rock boots or Baggy Criminal Damage trousers/tiny tartan skirts to get fed up of it. Maybe it's being an old fart, but I remember when seeing a goth as actually a bit shocking.
|>>|| No. 25352
You're an old fart who's out of the loop. I fail to believe that anyone actually buys anything in Camden any more as it is largely regarded as precisely that kind of utter tat by most inside the subculture. The only things worth going for are the venues or the long-established tattoo studios based there.
|>>|| No. 25354
That pic you posted looks like Toya Wilcox and I know she's wapped 'em out in some films.
I wouldn't say I was out of the loop, it's just the younger goths are all what the septics call "Mall Goths". Everything is off the rack with little to no customisation of their clothing and their music doesn't seem to venture far out from what they hear on Kerrang or Scuzz. You try to talk about them to Bauhaus only to get a blank look off them, most of them wouldn't have even heard of some of the more modern stuff like Type 0-Negative.
It's always the guys who aren't dressed up to the nines in the gear who are the ones who are into the stuff, the jeans and tee shirt crowd who are wearing a tee-shirt with band on they like not because it's a Ramones/Kiss/AC/DC etc. Tee bought in bloody Primark.
|>>|| No. 25356
That looks like a right laugh. See how it's not goth though? Goths would be dressed all in dark colours, swaying slowly to some depressing music. These lot have more in common with ravers.