>>40750
Is that fucking Sue Perkins?

>>40751
computer says no

>>40751

No.

>>40752
>>40753
Google image search tells me it is, and they were released a month ago. I never even heard about this.

Wonder when they were taken? Not recently I'm guessing.

Heavens above, it's The Great British Wank-Off.

I don't know, I've fancied her for so long now that I'm just faintly pissed off at whoever leaked the photos.

There is nothing guilty about ARE SUE. What kinds of high standards do you people have?

>>40751
>>40756
An understandable cognitive dissonance with nude “celebrity” leaks and as incorrigible (and illegal) leaking them is, it does remind that we are all just fallible people.

>>40757

Well I am guilty of having dreams of her having willies where her nipples would usually be.

>>40759

What the hell is wrong with your subconscious m8? She has such lovely nipples.

>>40760

Dicknipples are a very old school hentai/furry internet fetish.

You only have to be worried when it becomes shitting dicknipples.

Taylor Swift as a cat in Cats.

>>40801

They're a mile deep in the uncanny valley here. Everything about it is wrong.

The worst part is how they all have human lips and chins. It just makes them look like they're wearing gimp suits.

>>40802
I don't see the problem. I would go absolutely wild on Cat Swift.

>>40802

Human tits, no nipples. They can fuck right off, then come back so I can tell them to fuck off again.

>>40801
This movie is going to be fucking nuts on drugs.

>>40802
Why do they have no fur on their chins? Why? Their make-up budget didn't spread that far?

>>40806
>chins

Maybe they planned on having Sandra Bullock on board

Alright, between this and the Cats trailer I'm beginning to think something's up with me obligatory IYKWIM.

>>40814
Oh no you didn't.

>>40809
Is she called "Possom"? Anyway, I don't believe you really would. You are, and do not intend to shock but it is the truth, a fibber.

>>40816
Where's the guilty part?

>>40818
Well she's a bit trouty. You could make a Beefheart album cover with her.

>>40819

But who would play the bass?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_CQk6kIYJk

Even though her face is only a 3/10. What do you lads think?

>>40821
I think X/10 is a fucking daft system to measure attractiveness.

>>40821

Get away with your 3/10 nonsense, she's prime big tiddy goth gf material.

>>40821
I like her.

>>40821

Guilty would seems a bit harsh. But if I'm honest she is too fat for me to be a normal would. cue the brigade of people saying how she is perfectly normal size, even though perfectly normal size now is being fat.

She looks good in her clothes but I imagine I wouldn't like how she looked out of them.

I don't like judging her as a piece of meat really as she seem like the sort of person I could have a good laugh with.

>>40822
What measure or scale of attractiveness do you approve of? I'm open to new ideas.

>>40826
I would prefer a simple sliding scale:

Definitely Would
Would
Guilty Would
Would Not

>>40827
So you want to superficially object to the dehumanisation and objectification of women but retain the convenience of doing exactly that. Gotcha.

>>40826
>>40827
I'd be interested in some sort of system that differentiates between sexy and beautiful. Perhaps a list of factors that would benefit placing your exact type. I've thought about making a compass for this task but it is hard to describe the metric intersecting aesthetics and sex.

>>40828
No, I was just trying to invent a different sliding scale than something out of ten.

>>40821

There's some top notch boobery in her latest upload. (5:40).

>>40831

(8:17) seems more like your number

>>40832

Cheeky little lap dance at 26:15.

>>40831
I think she's great actually.

>>40831
I start to go soft when I can't clearly see the cutting scars covering her arms.

Konnie making a return to the Blue Peter studio:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m0007gcj/blue-peter-silver-badge-science

(A good day to you Sir!)

>>40840


(A good day to you Sir!)

>>40842

Wow, I haven't seen this 14yo girl in years.

Lotta' noncery ITT right now.

>>40843
I actually had a look into it and didn't find anything to suggest this. A look again gives a range of ages and a tenuous link to a facebook meme page.

Are you confusing it with the one story of a kid who only eats peanut butter and did some Lidl challenge?