Awesome, cheers.

>>34185
How would you deal with a total novice? Or even a virgin?

>>34187
I actually went through a phase when I was younger of taking a few lads' virginity.
I have the benefit of actually being a very nice and caring person. I'd take it at their pace, try not to let them cum straight away but let them know that it's ok if they do. Teach them about what to do to a woman, show them how a few positions work, that sort of thing.

>>34187

Quickly.

How does one acquire a .gs discount?

Do I need to look on groupon?

>>34190
If you're considering it just send me a message and say so, and I'm sure we can figure something out!

This seems like a trap of some sort.

>>34192
Have you stopped taking your meds again?

Do you work for the police or any other government agencies?

Also; escorts scare me, well... Used to scare me. You are making me think that I should try it.

>>34192
If only, mate.

>>34193
I don't mean trap as in tranny, I mean a girl posting on .gs offering her services to us directly... seems suspect.

>>34191
Nah I'm just joking about. Don't take it personally I'm not one for paying for sex. It also extends to not paying for porn in any form whether directly or indirectly (within reason).

That and I'm unemployed student where I'd have to save up at least two months worth of surplus income just to get a half an hour appointment.

However I did see that this AW site hosts a swinger site. That's been something of a fetish of mine for a while, kind of difficult to participate in such a thing without a partner, especially when I'd have to find a partner who would be into that sort of thing.

>>34192
>>34193
>>34194

This is a good point actually. OP, you should look up things to avoid saying in case you get a visit off Inspector Plod of the Special Branch. If someone asks you to confirm that they are paying for sex, you need to have a repertoire of replies that don't incriminate you.

>>34194
I am a totally normal person. I know I can't prove it to you but I am. I've been hanging around here for years (not sure that really qualifies as normal but hey ho), I went to uni, bla bla bla.

I can't really speak for any of the other girls, but I'm in it for the money, and because I have always been a very sexed up person. I had a few tinder hookups (don't judge!), before realising I can get paid for doing the same thing.

>>34199
What a mercenary attitude. I'd still bang you when I'm next in Bristol.

Any .gs lads who take up her offer need to come back here and post reviews.

>>34198
I imagine cops have got better things to do than wait for escorts to slip up. They prefer to chase kerb-crawlers and other anti-social behaviour.

How much would you charge to put shoe on head?

I think we're all forgetting the most important question: would you let a client piss in your arse?

I need to show my extremely religious parents that I have a girlfriend, and that I'm not a homosexual. I don't know how it works. Say I took you over to them, and we ended up staying for hours, when would I pay? Before hand, or after? Also, I would need a back-story of how we met, and fake names. Is it possible to meet a couple of hours before the mission to set things straight?

In the words of AW: "Note: Any money paid to the adult escorts listed on this website is for their time and companionship only. Whatever else that may occur if and when contact is made is the choice of consenting adults."

>>34201
For the right money. i.e. A LOT.

>>34203
Are you asking me personally, or theoretically?
Payment is generally at the start. If you're not entirely sure of timings pay for an estimate and make up the difference, or arrange a set price beforehand.

A lot of details can be worked out via email or whatever, but hell, you're paying for the time, do what you want with it.

Why the fuck can't all escorts format their AW profiles in decent English without 2002-era MSN emotes and all caps? It's putting me off. OP's profile is a bit sparse but is orders of magnitude better than

>HOT ENGLISH BUBBLY LASS LOOKING FOR GENTELMEN [sic] ;D

etc etc.

>>34204
For someone who has only had two clients so far you seem rather confident in your business abilities.

>>34204
>you're paying for the time, do what you want with it.
Will you sit and watch my interpretive dance theatre which features a raw chicken in a fez playing the role of King Lear? I'll explain the symbolism to you after.

>>34192

I know I'm a very cynical old fart but this stinks so, so much of "bored lad who did too much speed and is idly working on trolling an imageboard full of semi-autists" that it almost hurts my nose.

If you're real, lass, I wish you all the luck in the world but a gem like "I had a few tinder hookups (don't judge!)", might have been just one step too far for credence (unless you are actually American and are visiting our fair shores).

>>34206
I have had a lot of requests, more than I can accommodate (wheeeey). I'm not at all confident though, just answering the questions given.

>>34207
Can we play Scrabble after?

>>34208
Are you suggesting Tinder hasn't penetrated the British Isles? You'd be wrong.

I have been thinking about emailing this fine lady on an escort website. Basically, I want to practice poker with her. How do escorts feel about odd requests like that?

>>34210
>>34211

No, merely that the phrase "I had a few tinder hookups (don't judge!)" is so generically and mediocrely American-bimbo that it sounds as though it could have been lifted verbatim from one of Cat Marnell's XO Jane columns.

>>34209
Alright

Go into great detail about your encounters so far in a journal style or something so I can masturbate read your adventures with great pleasure. Maybe it might get you some extra customers. Of course protecting the identity of those involved.

I'm going to need to peruse more evidence before I come to any solid conclusions.

So post more pics (of your tits).

>>34216

If this is real I'm fairly sure there will be a fair few lads wanting to increment their "lasses I've shagged as a direct result of being on britfa" counts.

>>34217
If she was in London I would genuinely consider it, but I'm not heading out to the West Country just for the novelty of shagging someone on .gs

>>34218

What about Mansfield? Maroon will fuck you with a strap on for free*.

*Strap on not included - Bring your own strap on, is what I'm saying.

>>34185

I recognise those bedsheets... Expect a phonecall.

For those doubting toms, this isn't the other chan, for the sake of originality can we give the lass the benefit of the doubt and not start egging her into posting timestamps and the like.

>>34221

I don't think anyone can doubt she is legit after being naive enough to post an email that could be easily used to personally identify her in a thread about her exploits as a prostitute.

Anyway, you were the only one who mentioned timestamps, etc. Stop projecting.

Where are you Op?

fuck it, vIrgin, royally fucked off and the minute of reportaire with a.. gs user, may as well fuck it.

>>34222
I don't know what projecting means but I was carrying the posts to their logical conclusion.

>>34222
>being naive enough to post an email that could be easily used to personally identify
Yeah, I doxxed her too.

>>34223
Near Bath.

A blog, as requested. Apologies for the awful quality, past my bedtime. https://www.tumblr.com/blog/missrosiethings

>>34222
>>34225
Thanks boys.

>>34224

>Logic

Thinking yourself to outcomes that confirm your perspective bias is not logic, but I digress.

HOOKERS!

>>34226
Too far away for me, anyway good luck on your commercial sexual travels and your tit/armpit looks a bit odd in that picture.

I would very much like to fuck you

But then that applies to a quarter of a million people within fifteen miles of here


Weird when you think about it eh

>>34226
>Thanks boys.
You should be thanking us, for helping you to wise up
You don't understand what you're getting into. You've only had two clients.

Do you even use a separate name for your whoring? You are going to end up with some obsessed john stalking you.* If you really are going to continue with this, for fuck's sake get an email address that doesn't make it easy to find out everything about you. We're nice, others may not be.

*source: Known a few ladies of the night over the years (in a strictly non professional manner I might add) and they all stressed the importance of having another identity. And they had all had bad experiences, and heard about even worse ones from people who found out the girls real identity and started stalking her.

>>34185

I'm don't know if purps will make an exception for this, but anytime someone has been doxxed on /x/ the thread has been deleted. The fact that you made the thread and you more or less doxxed yourself might give you a by, but for future reference personally identifying information isn't allowed on /x/, incase we get sued.

>>34225
I remember long ago on the other chan someone had accidentally revealed their email in a MSN convo. I can barely remember what the story was about but the climax of it, turned out to be revenge. They constructed this whole story and they wanted people to take advantage of the "accidental" dox.

For all we know we aren't even talking to Miss Rosie. Could be an act of revenge that makes revengelad look like child's play. They want to reveal lovely Miss Rosie is a whore and has directed half of .gs towards her fanny.

Or Miss Rosie is very naive by posting her email where you can simply google it and find out her identity very easily.

>bannanaman
Is this some irc shit

If it is it can fuck right off my britfa.

>>34232

It was a joke from the /emo/ thread (I think). Untwist your knickers.

I can't find her. Why are you lot acting like you found her? Cunts.

>>34234
I'm pretty confident they haven't.

>>34229

This could be a new breed of UberRevengeLad scheming and we could be getting played like fiddles.

OP don't post you e-mail on here ever again. If you want to delete it click anonymous in the corner of the post.

On topic, how much would you charge to re-inact this scene for scene, with vocals, while naked for an audience of about 50 people?

https://www.youtube.com/v/cirhQ8iLdbw

>>34234
On closer inspection, it looks like a case of mistaken identity.

>>34236
She did say slutmail, I'm inclined to.think she did take that into account.

But all the same, be careful lass.

>>34237

I take it you thought it was that instagram with the pouty lass with 3 sprogs?

>>34236
We just have to wait for some clients with a history of their own to leave her some feedback.
http://www.adultwork.com/2600094

BUUUUUUSTED!

http://instagram.com/rosiejnixon

Who'd have thought, a well respected journalist and magazine editor. How very dare she!

>>34241
Delete it you childish prick.

>>34242
Do you really think OP is the editor of Hello! magazine?

>>34243
I don't know, I didn't look at it. What suggests to you that she isn't?

>>34241
Londoner? Explain why you think it's her, because that profile alone is seriously unconvincing.

>>34244
She seems essentially decent, for a start.

>>34245
Isn't it obvious that >>34241 is joking?

This is actually a genuine question now, since I thought it was but you're the second one to assume he's being serious.

You seem like a good girl.

This makes my ever present doigoonAW/doijuststickwithit conundrum evennharder.

>>34247
Why would you necessarily think otherwise?

>>34249
Otherwise than what? That >>3421 is joking, or that OP is genuinely the editor of Hello magazine?

>>34250
I don't know. I'm not familiar with hello! magazine. I've heard odder things than journalists posting on the Internet.

>>34252
If you weren't a cunt, you would post a link.

>>34251
I've heard odder things than journalists posting on the internet too, but few dafter than the idea that the editor of Hello magazine a) lurks and posts here; and b) would need the kind of money OP is making. I have no idea what Rosie Nixon gets paid, but I'm damn sure it's enough that she wouldn't think £150 would be worth getting out of, never mind into, bed for.

I also tend to assume good faith and a sense of humour from most people on here, and thus it seems much more likely that >>34241 found someone called Rosie that he thought it would be funny to misidentify as OP (especially given the common sense likelihood of it being a correct identification) than to assume he's maliciously outed a semi-public figure.

This is why we can't have nice things.

>>34253

I did post a link, though...

>>34253
I think you forgot a "n't" there.

>>34256
And I for one think you're a cunt for it.

I thought you twats wee better than this. Whether it's correct or not is immaterial. Shame on you.

>>34252
No outing lad.

>>34259
Don't worry, the cavalry are now here.

>>34259

She posted her details on the internet. There is more people than me and you browse .gs and I would wager the majority of them can out google me before breakfast.

I wanted to show her the folly of posting details on the internet, that is all. It could seriously affect her life and that is something I wouldn't wish on anyone so if I'm cunt for that then so be it.

>>34259

She baited here >>34235 and I was seeking to prove her wrong in the only way I knew that would allow her to see why this is a bad idea. The thread in of itself isn't the problem, but with a distinctive name (barring the possibility for pseudonym) and a location, provided by the AW profile in the /emo/ thread a man with barely any computer experience may have found out her real identity.

I don't want to see anyone get their life ruined so we can have our jollies.

>>34262>>34263
And your lesson is a useful and valuable one for escort-lass to learn - but given the propensity of Google to index this site, let's not make it easy for anyone. I'm certainly not going to ban you, but we will delete anything which obviously outs her. Seems fair.

>>34264

I always feel weird when you swoop in and arbitrate, but I appreciate the level headed calm with which you approached it. Sorry if anyone woke you.

Do I have to cancel the taxi to Bristol then?

Cunt may have been too strong, but I still think you could have made the same point without the link merely by mentioning a facebook page for her business. That said, I also think it doesn't matter hugely since OP seems bright enough to be using a pseudonym, but on principle it bugged me - people earlier in thread had the sense not to post links when they thought they'd identified her, and Rosie Nixon seemed so obviously absurd it was clearly intended as a joke, but you were quite happy to out her. The fact that you thought you were doing it for her own good or to teach her a lesson still seems a feeble excuse to me, but I'm clearly far surlier than his purpleness, so I'll shut up now.

>>34265
Thanks - nobody woke me, but I'm always here.

Escort-lass, I wish you the best of luck in your new venture, it seems like you're doing it willingly and with your eyes open, but babe, use a different/disposable email address when posting on this site please; for your own safety.

>>34267

I was one of the lads in the thread earlier, I doxxed it as soon as she posted the email and I was going to just email it to her directly. In hindsight, I probably should have, but I waited and when people started playing around with it I knew it was only a matter of time before someone retraced my steps, so to speak.

I thought it was a lesson the board needed to learn as well, because even though we are all mostly nice here I have posted barely identifying information on here in the past and ended up getting an email from a guy asking if he could piss in my arse.

That was obviously fine and a laugh, we knew each other outside of .gs, but this is of a more serious nature and shouldn't be underestimated because some of us might get a shag out of it.

Anyway, enough about this. The thread will speak for itself.

>>34270
>ended up getting an email from a guy asking if he could piss in my arse

This shouldn't make me laugh, but it does.

>>34270
>Anyway, enough about this. The thread will speak for itself.

This I want to have our mascot prozzie tell us adventures of her shagging strange men. I told .gs about much worse things in my time here so some whore lore would be nice.

>>34270
Damn it, between this post and purple being all reasonable and decent I feel thoroughly ashamed of myself for calling you a cunt now. For whatever it's worth I also think she's being naive about entering escort work (apparently even more naive than I thought if Rosie is her real name), but the link seemed a step too far. Anyway, I'm sorry I called you a cunt.

>>34273

Not a problem, lad. I'm a cunt about other things, like not flushing the toilet after me in public toilets.

Yes, I am that guy.

>>34274
You may not be a cunt, but you're clearly a monster.

Oh my goodness, I wake up and find all this has been going on.

Rosie isn't my real name. The link to the lass with the kids is unfortunate, but just a glance at our skin tones should be enough to tell you that we're not the same person.

>>34276
So that means we can have more pictures of your tits then? Or your bare back and ass?

>>34277
I second this pervert's call for pictures of tits and arse.

>>34276

That was a joke, the offending article was deleted because it was pretty convincing. No one actually thinks you're the Editor of Hello magazine.

>>34276

Rosie is an unfortunate psuedonym, because it appears there is a lass who runs a petsitting business in Bath called Rosie who fits your description on AW almost exactly.

If what you say is true, then no harm done, but I find it a facisinating coinicedence.

>>34274

That's very inconsiderate, I hope for your sake I never catch you doing it.

>>34282
*forth and then you*

>>34276
I'm shocked at the state of the thread too, there I was moaning about timestamping when everyone else was in fact 'doxxing'. Very poor show .gs.

>>34284

There were no 'doxx' to be found, anyone who thinks they found something (with the possible exception of >>34280, who is a rather clever chappy) is a chump of the highest order who thinks that non-linked pages and accounts brought back by a simple Google search of an email address are automatically 'doxx'.

Sage for hating all you young people who can't internet properly with all my tiny little black fucking heart.

>>34285
There was actually a deleted post that linked to a Facebook page that had contact info on it, and it was this that people were getting worked up about from >>34253 onwards.

>>34286

Uh, yeah he knows. He deleted it.

Good grief.

>>34287
Really? Then why is he saying >>34280 is rather clever when the link was to a page that contained phone number etc ('doxx' as I understand the term) for exactly the same person/business linked to in the deleted post? Not trying to be snide, just genuinely didn't read it that way (and as to whether he deleted the post, I have no way of identifying anyone on here unless they identify themselves, so I can hardly be blamed for not knowing that).

I also don't own a petsitting company, although maybe I should.

>>34290
You can sit on my pet IYKWIM

I have never had sex.

I want to have sex.

>>34289

Because that person at least had the nous to do more than just Google the email address and link random unrelated search results to the address based on a spurious inability to understand even the basics of how the internet works.

Or something.

>>34289

If you promise not to get too /boo/ about it... well, purple has tells and I'll leave it at that. 5 years is a long time to have browsed the one imageboard and I could pick him out of a line up at this point.

It always helps to know who you are talking to.

>>34290

You could open a sort of animal crèche for your clients, so they can take their dogs for a walk and have sex with a person.

I just realised an "animal crèche" is called a kennel.

>>34293>>34294>>34295

This is a knotty problem.

MissRosie90: there's knotting she won't do!

>>34296>>34297

Yes, grammatically there was more I could have done to make it clear whom was having sex with a person...

... still, OP could go for a hat-trick of debauchery?

>>34294

purple must actually post here more than I realised, I've been here that long too and wouldn't be able to tell him apart from anyone else. Didn't even realise >>34285 is apparently him.

>>34299

The trick is to look for the secret markers in the images he posts. It's all very hush hush, so I can't talk about it too much.

>>34300
Are you saying are purps is a bit... sneaky?

>>34301

I'm just saying there might be a more of a connection between the Pi symbol and the Pie Master then we're all led to believe. But you'd have to ask the secret mods Iceman (Puce) and Cyberbob (InternationalKleinBlue) if you want a better explanation than that, my life is probably in danger just talking about this level of initiation.

Can't read your blog without signing up for Tumblr, could anyone copypasta any interesting bits or tell me if it's worth giving my email out/setting up a spammail for.

Personally I'd like to hear your thoughts on the clients - nothing identifiable of course but just your impressions and whether they met your assumptions etc.

>>34303
Yeah, I'm trying to figure that out. I've viewed countless tumblr blogs before without needing to sign up. I'm trying to investigate.

>>34304
http://missrosiethings.tumblr.com/

Ah-ha!

>>34305
Awesome, cheers.

Is this you too, Rosie?

>>34307
of course.

>>34185
You should refer to your clients as "Jims".

>>34305
Awesome, my previous post is redundant.

The Intro did remind me of the fact that even in porn big tits and blonde hair are in the minority compared to brunettes with average sized funbags. I'd assume a similar mentality of the 'average' hooker is not so close either.

Rosie is making me seriously consider hiring as escort in my local area. It's been fucking ages since I've had a shag and this one petite lass's £50 for half an hour's in-and-out to break this depressing streak seems pretty reasonable.

>>34309
I should. Are you John, then?

>>34310
Perhaps. I don't watch porn all that much. Girls I think are less visual. Certainly I just generally use my imagination, or perhaps a bit of erotic literature once in a while.

>>34311
Do it, but only if she has decent reviews. That seems pretty cheap so watch out, but then it might be standard in your area.

1) Are you from IRC
2) Will you peg me?
3) Can I record it for .gs?

>>34305
You should probably get them to wear condoms for oral.

>>34312
Men are aroused visually, women aurally.

But that's obvious anyway.

That's science that is

The most fantastic hour I have had for a long long time. Very much made my dreams come true, I'll be back for seconds!

CONGRATS - YOUR FIRST REVIEW

Presumably it would be better for any of us to pile in now, before the carpet gets worn, as it were.

>>34307

Yeah because your average girl next door would have had the opportunity to have taken that photo.

Christ alive.

I'm going to throw down a few sleeping pills with a London Pride sign off for tonight.

This isn't a slight on Rosie or any other prostitute for that matter, but I can't believe people will pay £100 for an orgasm. Does anyone not immediately feel like an idiot afterwards? As in *cums* "oh fuck, I could have just used my hand for free".

>>34319

Fuck me, the second guy paid £150! What an idiot!

>>34320

>Fuck me
For the right price...

Where the hell are the reviews? Who designed the website? Google? Fuck me.

>>34322
Ctrl + F "Rating". Not that that is really necessary, you blind bastard.

>>34319
I know, it's crazy. Like I said I'd probably be doing this sort of thing anyway so if I can get paid for it then it would be stupid not to.

>>34318
What are you talking about? It's not outside the bounds of imagination for a girl who lives near the coast to visit a beach during the summer and do some sunbathing in the nip.

>>34325

Yes it is. I can not imagine such a thing. You are clearly extraordinarily mentally ill.

Would you give a discount to Britfa.gs posters due to us encouraging you? Do you do student/disabled discounts?

>>34327
> Do you do student/disabled discounts?
I'm now imagining someone faking a limp like they do to get on the sick, only to get a suck off discount.

>>34327
Is there an extra discount for disabled students?

So what is the etiquette regarding safe sex?

Who provides the condom? The prozzie or the john?

>>34329
Yes but even with a loan it still costs an arm and a leg.

>>34331
Get out.

>>34330

Working girls always carry condoms, they'd be mad not to.

>>34330
Me, of course. Part of the service, plus I would never trust a condom from someone else. You never know.

No one from here has asked.me yet so I don't know, haven't decided!

>>34334
About discounts that is, sorry, wasn't clear.

>>34328>>34327

"Just the half hour, my hip's playing up and I've got a dissertation due. Now, what's your policy on arse pissing..?"

>>34325
There's a blog entry on this by the way.

If I bring my autism diagnosis and my student card and a photo of Moaty, that should be good proof of needing a discount, right?

>>34333>>34334
A lot of men wouldn't trust a condom provided by a woman. Granted escorts have more reason to protect themselves but there's always those scary women about who needle a condom for malicious intent.

It's a funny world when the most common and advanced protection against STDs and pregnancy is nothing more than a latex sheath. My dad was told in his youth that we'd all be living on the moon by the time he was an adult. I was told there would be more advanced forms of protection for sex when I was an adult. The expectations from my generation was pretty fucking low and we haven't even managed that.

Also no three sea shells

>>34340
>sex organs using artificial elastomer synthesised by polymerization of petroleum by-products

Keep going, I'm nearly there..

>>34339
>It's a funny world when the most common and advanced protection against STDs and pregnancy is nothing more than a latex sheath.
Why? Were you hoping for some sort of energy forcefield? You can make anything sound disappointing if you phrase it the right way. "Nothing more than a latex sheath"? We used to use nothing at all, or animal intestines, or prayer. Now we protect our sex organs using artificial elastomer synthesised by polymerization of petroleum by-products. There you go, that sounds more futuristic.

>>34341
Sorry, had to fix my spelling.

>>34339
If I ever end up dating a woman I met on OkCupid who answered 'No' to the question 'is abortion an option in case of an accidental pregnancy', I will always provide my own fucking condoms.

>>34339

>It's a funny world when the most common and advanced protection against STDs and pregnancy is nothing more than a latex sheath.

Given that STDs can be transmitted by pre-ejaculate, ejaculate and vaginal fluid, the only practical solution is a mechanical barrier. Latex and nitrile rubbers are an excellent material for this task due to their flexibility and non-porosity, which is why we use these materials for surgical gloves.

Given the necessity of a mechanical barrier, the question is not of superseding the condom but improving it. The Gates Foundation has given a number of grants to organisations working on that problem, many of which are very promising. In particular, the team working on graphene-composite materials may eventually produce a condom that is just microns thick while offering drastically better protection than latex.

http://www.businessinsider.com/11-innovative-condoms-awarded-grants-2013-11

Contraception is essentially a solved problem, the difficulty is protection from STDs. The only plausible non-barrier approach would necessitate vaccines for all known STDs, which is possible but hugely ambitious. Such a solution could be easily undone by the evolution of a novel STD.

>>34342

>We used to use nothing at all, or animal intestines, or prayer.
http://www.cracked.com/article_19909_6-famous-symbols-that-dont-mean-what-you-think_p2.html

>>34346
Fuck off.

>>34347

I'll certainly think about putting it on my to do list.

>>34345
How about spray on condoms?

I've never liked putting on the damn things. I'd like to say I'm too big for most condoms but that is an utter lie.

>>34349

It's entirely possible that you are too big for most condoms. A tiny increase in girth can be unnoticeable and make putting them on a right pain in the arse. Most condoms, even large ones bought in a shop will be around 60mm or less. Trojan XLs are 58mm at the base. Your head will be somewhat bigger than this.

If you want to try bigger ones and see if it's any easier to get them on, you can get some here. I've searched for mysize, as they offer very large girths. I'm not that big to be honest, but I find that using the larger sizes makes it easier to get them on.

http://www.britishcondoms.co.uk/?post_type=product&s=mysize

>>34350
I really should measure my girth. All I know is the length (as wide as a PSP 2000) and even then I don't know the exact length.

I don't even know my own height. I don't even own measuring tape, I didn't get one in last year's Christmas crackers.

>>34185

Well this is kind of weird.

Was browsing 4chan this evening and I saw a 'we're going on holiday thread' - so I thought I'd check the British destination.

When I arrive, what do I find but a very dear friend of mine 'Miss Rosie' starring in her very own thread.

You've all provided a great deal of entertainment for me tonight, gentlemen. Treat her right.

>>34352

Why did you feel the need to announce that you were from 4chan? Why do they always feel the need to announce they are from 4chan? I... I don't understand.

Wouldn't "Hey, I know that burd!" Have sufficed?

>>34353
Because it is a secret club, that is not so secret. They are all idiots, anyway.

>>34353
To be fair he does know me, very well in fact. Maybe he thought you wouldn't believe that he turned up by random, but it seems that he did.

Also, he took my virginity way back when. And he has a big dick.

>>34355

Audible mirth.

>>34355
So what you're saying is, your first experience of sex was so terrible, it made you become an escort to try and smother it from your memory?

>>34355

I have a friend who became a lesbian after having sex with a guy with a big dick.

True story.

>>34357

What I'm saying is that we corrupted one aother at a young age, and have both been very naughty ever since. And we both have a love of fucking outdoors.

>>34359

Get a room then, who gives a fuck? You are going to put a serious dent in any business you might hope to garner from .gs if you have one of your exs posting in the thread forcing people to smell his fingers.

>>34360
>forcing people to smell his fingers

Wait, are you saying she is TAINTED?

>>34361

Why is it so hard to find a pure and innocent virgin prostitute?

>>34361

I was implying he would scare off the Johns. I take it that wasn't obvious? Hmm.

This thread is beginning to piss me off.

>>34362

Well I never had any problems, mate.

>>34364
It is starting to piss me off too.

>>34366
Any behaviour that smacks of name-fagging and trying to establish personal identity on here has always annoyed me too.

>>34367
I didn't mind it at first but now it's descended into typical 'oh look a girl on the internet' wankery, 'doxxing' and fucking Satan's Wankstain Palace has shown up.

>>34368

>Satan's Wankstain Palace

POTW

I am missing some context here or I'm being thick as usual.

What's this about Miss Rosie posting on the otherchan or something? I'm completely lost and would like a summary.

>>34370

Sorry lad. I would give you one, but my annoying questions quota was filled by my missus today when she asked me if Dinosaurs were real.

>>34370
From the looks of it, someone was on 4chan and there was one of those threads telling people to go to country-specific imageboards to get 'souvenirs'. This particular person came here and stumbled upon this thread, and apparently he is the person Rosie (the OP) lost her virginity to and he has a big dick and they like fucking outside.

I too am pissed off by this thread, I only like people having an identity when it's accidental and amusing (going out with GLC lad, auntie fucker, father-in-law says Noel Edmonds is a cunt, down syndrome brother who enjoys his ale etc).

>>34367
Well of course you would say that.

Normally when I see a thread that has blown up to 200 posts in a few days I get excited. This has just been disapointing.

>>34372
While I dislike being an attention whore with some sort of ego or narcissism I am disappointed that my .gs nickname was not among the ones you have listed.

Either way ARE Rosie may want to remove any connection from her real life and whore life pretty swiftly if she hasn't already. The lads over at 4chan can be very persistent depending on the board. I'm guessing the board in question was either /b/ or /int/? I know /int/ aren't particularly fond of this site.

>>34372

>father-in-law says Noel Edmonds

My vague recollection of this involved someones garden being damaged/vandalised, I'm think.

I was going to make a list of "characters" from .gs last week for posterity and that story didn't even occur to me. I've been looking through my .gs image folder recently too and I think I genuinely have a few pieces of .gs history in there.

>>34378
It's a love-hate relationship. They can't stay away.

>>34378

>/int/ aren't particularly fond of this site.

Bans are working then, good to know.

>>34378

>etc

Whats tha matta? A nod to your alum status not good enough for ya?

https://www.youtube.com/v/l4q2LLX5oLw

No actual gash in 182 posts - sorry lads, there is only one thing to do to this thread.

FFS it is next to >>11147 - I had to take action.