Get a Fleshlight brand wanking sleeve (or a Tenga Flip), as the off-brand ones are a false economy. They're usually cheaper on Amazon or Lovehoney than the Fleshlight store. If you're not sure which to get, the Flight is a good option if you're 6" or less. Bear in mind that when the description says "super tight" or "ultra tight", they really aren't messing about.

If you're feeling adventurous, get yourself an Aneros.

>>41066
Cheers for the tip on off-brand. I didn't fancy doing it off Amazon so opted to pay a tenner more to go direct. Then ended up paying more for free shipping from the US so I'm going for the Ice Lady because the girl on the ad looked nice. I'll do a review when it arrives but will save you all from a picture of me fucking transparent plastic.

I noticed that warming rods are being sold as an accessory, would leaving in it the sink with hot water for a bit work just as well?

>>41067

>would leaving in it the sink with hot water for a bit work just as well?

Yes, absolutely - fleshlight recommends this themselves. As far as I can tell, these warming rod things take a good ten minutes to actually warm the fanny, where leaving it in a sink full of hot water can do it in three or four.

>>41067

>would leaving in it the sink with hot water for a bit work just as well?

Yep.

Use water-based lube, as oils or silicones can damage the sleeve. Obviously you'll need to wash and dry it after use to prevent mould. After a few washes it'll start to feel a bit sticky, at which point you just need to lightly dust it with cornflour to restore the original texture.

Can any of you recommend some of those vibrating panties or is our expertise solely restricted to things you do to yourself while watching the neighbours through the blinds?

>>41070

We-Vibe Sync, Lelo Tiani or Lovense Lush.

>>41071
No, non-penetrative ones. Just panties that vibrate.

>>41067
Eh, it's like a fanny I guess - bit of faff but I do seem to have a better post-orgasm high. Should keep me occupied for a few weeks at least. You'll want to buy a big bottle of water based lube beforehand as your just getting a free sample in the box.

I was surprised by how big and bulky it is. It's definitely not something you can be discrete about. Not a problem for me, of course, but getting a see-through one might be a bit depressing for those who don't reach the end and it's a bit of a waste of money just for that.

>>41077
Yeah, I'm bored of it now. Waste of money.

As can be expected there is no such thing as a noiseless fleshlight and really it's entirely too cumbersome compared to your hand (especially when flicking around porn videos). I've found myself on more than one occasion putting it aside and going back to the classic which is much more enjoyable. At least it's reaffirmed that the real pleasure of being with a woman is something entirely unconnected to what's between her legs. Beyond that, you can't beat the hand and its job.

Give it 20-40 years and this post will be repeated for a sexbot.

>>41085 Give it 20-40 years and this post will be repeated for a sexbot

Won't the sexbot be inhabited by an AI that'll make it all much more credible and fun?

(And when I say AI, I mean cloud-connected min-wager / political prisoner in the third world, possibly Wales.)
(And when I say inhabited by, I mean sharing it with ebola spiders or whatever pandemic we have by then).
I'd hope this glorious vision can be delivered in less then your timescale, though.

>>41086
>third world possibly Wales
I promise you this, we might not have anything going on here in Wales but the Welsh Parliament will always be there, long after everyone should have just fucked off.

I'm 28, I really fucking hope I get to see some proper sexbots. Ideally ones that look like Jennie Kim.

>>41086
>Won't the sexbot be inhabited by an AI that'll make it all much more credible and fun?

I'm sceptical over how this will play out. With cloud-computing of a sub-human AI you're essentially putting your dick in a facebook algorithm so at any moment it might go "harder senpai awoo~ :3" or morph into the Go Compare bloke. That's without getting into the significant hurdles of bio-mechanics or it's limitations on the theatre of the mind.

At any rate, first thing I'm going to do with a sexbot is send it out to find a job. That's probably what retirement will be like, you'll mentally operate your "sexbot" from your deathbed and after that your brain's neurons will be recycled to keep doing it. Nobody will know why all sexbots eventually start screaming so they'll just remove the audio.

>>41088

This is my best offer:

>>41065

What is going on in that picture exactly it looks like the flesh is burning off a dildo to reveal a mechanical interior with 5 missile pods. Is this what is inside a T-800s pants?

>>41092
We thought penis-lad was merely looking to lose sensitivity to tactile touch. We thought wrong.

I've used cock sleeves (well, "ona holes") in the past and as others have mentioned, you really do need to take care of them. How to best do so depends on what material they are made from. The two most common materials are silicone and "TPE", both cover a variety of materials with adjuncts to affect softness and flexibility but while silicone care v.s. TPE care are quite different, caring for the "sub-varieties" does not. A quick google search will be able to provide you with much more detail about both than I can type up here, but the short version is that TPE requires more care and attention and is slightly more prone to mould.

For all toys, stick to water based lube if you can and rinse them immediately. If you cannot invert them to dry, do not be tempted to stick them on or near a radiator. If the hole stays open naturally you can point a fan at it, otherwise leaving a tampon in there for 30 minutes or so can draw out a lot of moisture. If you get a TPE toy, use baby oil to re-hydrate it (every couple of months at most, depending on use), wipe off the excess, then apply talcum powder or corn starch to restore its texture.

> I noticed that warming rods are being sold as an accessory

All of these toys require some sort of lube, you could use vaseline as both silicone and TPE cope OK with it, but cleaning up is infinitely easier with water based lube so placing the toy and the lube you intend to use in warm water does a perfectly fine job. If you're after a sleeve type toy, do not buy them. Silicone based lube damages both, ironically enough, and "oil based" lubesare a complete no-go. The latter have seriosuly fallen out of fashion anyway as they universally damage condoms.

Where warming rods make sense is if you have a fixed-opening love doll where the holes are surrounded by enough material to leach the warmth out of pre-warmed lube and you cannot feasible submerge the entire toy. But in those scenarios the cost of the toy will eclipse the cost of the warmer by a few orders of magnitude.

Speaking of love dolls... in a couple of weeks this should be mine. It's a "factory proof" picture, but I can't help the feeling that it looks like a meat packing plant. The insert on the right is just the icing on the cake. She'll be used as a cuddle companion, but she does have holes... I don't think I'll use them, but who knows what'll develop.

>>42113
That toe (yes, that one) looks incredibly uncomfortable.

>>42114
The toes are a bit of a weak point. They should have a wire in them to casually pose them (other makes fuse all but the big toe for that reason) but I guess if you're the warehouse worker who takes the pictures you quite understandably don't much care.

>>42115
And if the toes put you off, a doll that can stand upright will have bolts sticking out of its soles. There are options for foot fetishists to avoid them, but those cannot really stand up straight without damaging them.

>>42116
It's not the toes that put me off but whatever makes you happy mate.

>>42117
Well, the bendy toe bothered me as well. My only concern is that I opted for a body heating element but the connector is a bit more prominent than I expected. I guess I can sculpt a plug for it, but as it'll be clothed for usage I imagine it won't be too much of an issue.

>>42118
Are you actually in this factory/wanking den at the moment, or are these just some surprisingly relevant photos?

Sex toys - dolls specifically - seem to be that last step in total isolation from the possibility of achieving a meaningful relationship with anyone but yourself. Doll users obviously want the comfort of another, so why would they do this to themselves? The only way to discard a sex-doll would be to dismember and dump the body - literally practice the destruction of love. There's no coming back from that.

Although saying that, here's a story telling the complete opposite - https://geekologie.com/2008/09/woops-how-not-to-dispose-of-a.php
Yet another flipside - https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird-news/blokes-sex-doll-discovery-sparks-18977810

There's a weird undercurrent of sex-as-object to the sex-doll industry which i fear could get out of hand. That link above literally shows a person taking a female-replica from a bin, for fuck sake.

Pictured are some interesting points on the subject, beside the bigotry.

>>42118
This image makes me think that the focus is a bit wrong with sex dolls. Why seek to merely create a simulacrum of the female form when you might improve upon it.

>>42121
>Pictured are some interesting points on the subject, beside the bigotry.

Sounds pretty dense to be honest. If I want to have sex then I have my hand, a lass is more than that and not only combines some of the companionship of a dog (or parakeet) but provides income and support in difficult times plus you have someone that stops you going crazy.

Personally, the moment I get a fembot I'm putting it to work. They'll be no time for sex I assure you and as it only seems possible with networked intelligence and mass data collection I think I'll give it a miss before I let Bezos literally fuck me.

>>42122
'A lass is essentially a dog you can have sex with'? That's kind of objectifying.

>>42121

>There's a weird undercurrent of sex-as-object to the sex-doll industry which i fear could get out of hand.

This is the sort of thing fisherpersons (of the older generation, typically) have been saying for years about basically anything related to the sex industry. Of course it doesn't take much of a leap to infer that what they really fear is losing the only real and tangible value women have over men.

The central contradiction of fish-husbandry is that they want equality with men, without succumbing to the same expendability as men; thus the thing they fear most is replacement. A world where men can freely choose an alternative to a woman's company and role in reproduction, is a world wherein women are at last truly equal.

So, as such, I say the state should provide sex robots for all.

If life like or even half life like robots with genitalia become a thing, and leaving aside chronic masturbators screeching, I wonder what effect it will have on society

>>42125

They almost certainly won't become a thing, it's significantly more realistic to build/mass-market/hide/customise an augmented reality or VR setup than anything remotely realistic to the naked eye. The only real hurdle there is how you do the haptics.

>>42119
I meant it literally when I said that particular doll will be mine, the pictures are from the mentioned set of factory proof pictures. Dolls like this are all at least partially custom jobs, before they they get shipped a reputable manufacturer will supply pictures to give you a chance to make sure it's as ordered and to make last minute adjustment requests if needed.

>>42121
> Sex toys - dolls specifically - seem to be that last step in total isolation from the possibility of achieving a meaningful relationship with anyone but yourself.

This is straying into /emo/ territory which I was deliberately trying to avoid, but more or less correct.

>>42122
> Why seek to merely create a simulacrum of the female form when you might improve upon it.

The sky's the limit, if you have the budget they'll build it for you.

>>42126
For penis owners at least automated wank sleeves have been a thing for quite a while, qdot's buttplug.io hooks most of those into VRChat. Even with those, I imagine a Sonny style feedback machine will eventually come along.

>>42127
I've always promised myself one, but only if I somehow become stupidly rich like a lottery win or unexpected long lost relative inheritance.

>>42127
I like that you didn't post a picture of your new girlfriend's face out of respect for her privacy.

>>42130
What are the odds she looks eerily like Vorderman?

>>42131
About 1 in 3

>>42127
>The sky's the limit, if you have the budget they'll build it for you.
Customs would like a word with you.

The picture in the OP looks reminiscent one of those suctiony "blowjob simulators". Have either of you tried one of those? I didn't get on with a fleshlight when I owned one, but the thought of having something I can plug in and enjoy hands-free is quite appealing.

I had one of those onahole things. It was one based off a JAV stars genitalia. It even had the doctor who moulded the thing proudly displayed on the box -https://www.motsutoys.com/satomi-yuria-s-kinchaku-series.html

I tried to tell people my experience about it on here and got a ban for 'shilling' an obscure japanese sex toy, as if the tendrils (tentacles) of the japanese adult toy industry go that deep.

Well it felt great while fucking but for some reason on climax I felt very... over-stimulated. Like I was pissing my pants.

>>42135
This does nothing to make it appealing.

>>42133
I'm aware there are legal limts but the ones I'm aware of are quite sane. Did you have a bad experience with them?

>>42137
She finally arrived, after her jaunt through what I'm sure are her Majesties Finest in the Home Office's Border Force detained her and made UPS run for a loop.

All joking aside this package which I would've accepted might be a bit suspect was it not for the fact that these dolls aren't special and that hundreds make it into the UK. What were they looking for? They ruined the extererior and didn't re-package the goods properly, though they did tape up the box properly however so some points. And demanded £130 for the pleasure.

Can't complaiin though, she is exactly as much of a pain in the ass as I imagined, and ultimately dreaded. Unless you've fucked a dead fish, this is not for you.

>>42154

Just as good in bed as my missus then. And probably does the dishes about as often too. Fancy swapping?

>>42154
What's her name? If I know anyone with the same name I will be horrified, so hopefully you've called her Xena or DaShauntay or something.

>>42156
>I will be horrified

Honestly seen enough, without the name.

>>42156
>Monique-early_nap.jpg

>>42154
Always figured these things as a "Don't meet your Heroes" situation. Great in your head, but not in reality.

>>42159
You'd turn down whatever the gs equivalent of the big tiddy goth gf is? Big tiddy maths grandmother?

>>42160

The .gs equivalent of big tiddy goth gf is big tiddy goth gf, only she has to be from a council estate background.

>>42160
Nigela Lawson?

>>42159
> Always figured these things as a "Don't meet your Heroes" situation. Great in your head, but not in reality.

I think this summarises my experience with the doll so far. The craftsmanship is real, the material is soft, stretchy, forgiving, and there's a semi-realistic skeleton embedded in the doll. With a bit of make-up experience and practice this would make a great practice model for photographers. Monique doesn't quite have all the mobility that a real human has, but it's close. Being a bit 'rona lonely having a human shaped object to sit next to and cuddle a bit is quite nice, and the internal heating system might take a few hours to its work but it helps none the less.

Moving the Doll
First and foremost, moving Monique is an effort. If you ever had to move an unconscious person you'll know just how heavy bodies are; now, this doll is only around 40Kg but its joints are a lot stiffer than a human's so its easier to lift but harder to get around corners. Ideally, you want the "burrito wedding carry", i.e. wrap the doll in a sheet, move the arms out of the way, bend the knees and if possible arch the back slightly. Then lift with your knees not your back and move it where it's needed. Monique has bolts in her feet to stand upright but it cannot stand unsupported, aligning both legs so that all six bolts are level is no mean feat and you need to align the rest of its body so the centre of gravity lines up. Lean it against a wall, and that's a non-worry though put some shoes or socks on its feet so the bolts don't ruin your floor. If you get one leg out of alignment and the weight rests one the other, it might buckle. If this sounds like and engineering problem, then that's because it is.

Preparing the doll for sex
The doll is made of TPE or Silicone, neither is self-heating, self-lubricating, or self-cleaning. Dolls are room temperature, in almost all situations that's going to be a lot less than body temperature, so if you stick your end into a relative ice bath you're unlikely to have a good time. Unlike fleshlights, ona-holes, or other toys, there's way too much material to heat up in a moment of passion so you'll need to plan ahead. The USB heating rods are suprisingly effective, you can pre-heat your lube a bit in hot water, but ultimately this needs some preparation. You need to heat both the doll and depending on the mass of the doll the lube. Lube incidentally is entirely not optional.

Dealing with the doll post-sex
This is where the real work starts. You can use a femidom and cut down on the post-cleanup, but ultimately you're going to have to clean out the TPE/silicone hole. That means moving the doll to either the toilet or the shower and douching its cavitites a few times (you can get shower attachments which help a lot), then I recommend 2-3 tampons at varying depths to get the moisture out. You will have to reach into the cavity to place the first two tampons. Femidom makes this a monthly rather than a per-use issue. You can get removable inserts, but even with those you want to occasionally sanitize the orifice.

Doll Maintenance
Unless you are lonely like me, I'd thoroughly recommend you do not get a doll. TPE requires constant maintenance, constant powdering with talcum or corn starch, constant vigilance for tears and surface abrasions which need fixes or they get worse.

Unless you are very sure you want a 40Kg lumb of silicone in your life, stick to masturbators.

>>42163
It seems like they ought to make an internal connection between the two holes, so you can just stuff warm water through the loop, both for warming and cleansing, with maybe a final flush of lube and disinfectant to prep for next use.
The current regime sounds astoundingly unerotic. Clamping a groinal cleansing unit on would also be unerotic, but maybe less foul?

>>42163
Thanks for a detailed insight.
I hope she gives you the companionship and comfort you seek.

Honeymoon period didn't last long then eh, lad?

>>42166
You think it lasted negative-two years?

>>42166
I'm looking forward to when he wants to get rid and we can put our brains together to make it as fun a send-off as possible.

Maybe stick it in someone's back garden looking into the house at night. Leaving it in the middle of a dark country road or outside a school. The possibilities are endless.

>>42168

Sneak it into a clothing store (if there are any left) and leave it in the window with some mannequins.

>>42168
>>42169
No, no. Set it on fire on a river. Send it to Valhalla. Or Maybe it will come back when the machines rise up. His cum soaked Terminator will kill him.

>>42170
If it's silicone, fire won't really touch it, you'll just get a powdery layer on the outside. Proper terminator stuff.

I think they'll end up getting granulated, reconstituted and used for playground flooring / gym mats. The faint smell of cum will be a delight.

>>42171
20 years later and he will have police asking about DNA evidence found in schools across the country. The perfect alibi

>>42164
Cleanup is not erotic, but a loop wouldn't help much. It's nice to have the holes separated in fact, because that means I need to clean only one hole at a time. The real chore is moving it to a position where I can safely clean Monique without causing trouble. USB heating stick (I'm tempted to send it to BigClive, but I imagine it's very boring) picture attached.

>>42165
Thank you. I think I won't use her for sex anymore, but as someone to lean on when I read or relax she does a wonderful job.

>>42166
As Monique was delayed, I bought another doll that was already in the UK, so now I have a second doll I don't really want. Monique is my couch partner, this new intruder I can take or leave. I'm tempted to remove the TPE and make a skeleton of her.

>>42173

>(I'm tempted to send it to BigClive, but I imagine it's very boring)

He beat you to it, and you're right, though it's interesting enough for a two minute interlude :

>>42173
How does the other girl compare to Monique?

>>42174
... of course he has, what was I thinking. Mine's exactly the same on the inside.

>>42175
Slightly taller, much smaller breasts, but also an "improved" skeleton with more articulation. It can shrug its shoulders, has a more flexible back and more ways the arms and legs can twist and bend. That sounded like a neat thing to have but given the trouble I have with Monique to pose her properly the extra options just made it fiddly to deal with.

This thread makes me feel uncomfortable.

>>42177
I think it was alright until dollchap started posting his diary.

Being open about toys is liberating for men and women, but you'd never hear them discussing a life-size silicone man on Loose Women would you.

>>42178
Simon Cowell's been brought up a couple of times, definitely.

>>42178
They've probably mentioned them before, though they're probably thinking along the lines of Mustafa Shag and Ophelia Balls the blow up Ann summers guff.

>>42178
"Male" sex dolls have been featured on BBC3 ("Sex Robots and Us'"), Channel 5 ("The Sex Business" S3E4) and "Slutever" (S1E8) which was produced by Vice but presented by Karley Sciortino who has an English accent and that sort of horse-girl sex worker vibe so I'm counting it.

>>42181
Please tell me you're an archivist or maybe even a producer.

>>42182
The only two professions who know how to use a search engine.

>>42183
That's unfair. It seemed likely you'd rattled them off from memory.

>>42184
I saw Slutever but couldn't remember what it was called and the other two came up when I was trying to find it.

>>42178
I thought I was providing useful information about large sex toys while keeping baggage to a minimum. My apologies, clearly I got it wrong.

Attached is a partial skeleton of the second doll before disposal. Every nut and bolt is tack-welded into place, rotational joints are achieved by a bolt through a u-section screwing into a nut welded into a tube section.

>>42187
It's not your problem mate, it's mine/ours. I'm not intending to be judgemental, but maybe there's something inherently less... salubrious about them than other toys. Maybe it's the uncanny valley, maybe it's that it's humanoid but unable to give consent... I dunno.

>>42188
Stop being a poof. I was learning things, things of no benefit to my life but certainly internet things.

>>42188
Hide the thread. I certainly enjoyed his detailed findings.

>>42187
I thought she would have more than just that. What makes her so heavy? And what are you going to do with the extra doll?

>>42178
This isn't a daytime tv show though, is it? It's an imageboard with a front page mostly warning against posting CP, and a mod team full of trannies and XR fanatics.

>>42187
I've enjoyed your encounters, where else are you going to be able to document something like this?

I just want to pile on and tell the naysayers to fuck off back to mumsnet.

>>42187
This picture has sent me down an unsettling rabbit hole. All I'll say is there's a lot more star wars droid porn than you'd expect.

>>42189
>>42190
>>42191
>>42192
Fucking hell lads enough histrionics. I'm not telling him to stop. In fact I implied the opposite.

>>42187
No ribcage? Are there plastic ribs, or is it solid silicone? Any reduction in density for lungs?
Are those joints all tightened up for stiffness, or is that done elsewhere?
It all seems terribly amateur, even though there's been such progress on making them look less weird.
I'm so happy https://realhamster.com is still online. The internet was a much simpler place back then.

>>42188
> Maybe it's the uncanny valley, maybe it's that it's humanoid but unable to give consent...
Understandable, pros and cons aside it's not for everyone.

>>42190
> What makes her so heavy?
The skeleton is quite light, but the rest of the doll is solid TPE. On the left is a small slab (~6" diameter, 5" tall) that used to be on the upper thigh to give you an idea of how much this stuff weighs.

> And what are you going to do with the extra doll?
I was going to throw the whole thing away, to do so I removed the TPE from the skeleton in chunks and disposed of them. The skeleton was going to be next but I think it looks kind of neat so I'm keeping it for now. What looks like the "hip bone" is roughly at belly button level, by the way. The heads are interchangeable and can be screwed in or be attached with the quick-change bolt shown.

>>42197
> Are there plastic ribs, or is it solid silicone? Any reduction in density for lungs?
No ribcage, no reduction. It's solid silicone.

> Are those joints all tightened up for stiffness, or is that done elsewhere?
They are tightened and then welded into position to avoid them coming loose.

>>42198

If dismembering a sex doll doesn't get you put on some kind of list, it really should do.

>>42198
It's interesting how Monique is named and refered to as 'she' while the other is an 'it'. How did you come to name your friend, and what does it mean to you?

>>42199
It's okay, I'm sure otherlad can still get a job with the Met.

>>42199
If I enjoyed it I'd agree with you. But this wasn't a dismemberment, it was a disassembly of an expensive mistake.

>>42200
I messed up on occasion but deliberately tried to keep doll #2 as "it" because basically as soon as it arrived I intended to get rid of it. The name "Monique" has no particular significance, I came across it in a list of names and liked the sound of it, Monique is a "she" to me because she's a surrogate partner (/emo/). I don't know any real person with that name.

>>42202
>But this wasn't a dismemberment, it was a disassembly of an expensive mistake.

Ah, yes much less serial killerey when you put it like that.

Odd about the name though, when I'm playing pornographic videogames I name females Rachel. It's a name I like because I've never met a Rachel I didn't agree with, one I wouldn't mind giving to a daughter. Although now that I've just thought that sentence through I definitely will not be calling my daughter Rachel.

>>42203
You've never met a Rachel you wouldn't mind giving to your daughter?

>>42203
That made me note that whenever I can name a female in a game I name them Alyssa. Shit.

>>42203
So, dear soothsayer, how would you dispose of a quite realistic doll of a human? If you don't want to sell it and pass on the responsibility, do you chuck the humanoid body into a bin bag and traumatise/annoy the binmen? Chuck it into a hedge and do the same to dog walkers and joggers? Once you've made the mistake of getting this responsibility, what do you propose is the solution? If you're the canal pusher... CRT or some magnet fisher would have to deal with your bollocks.

>>42206

Not him, but I'd probably butcher it like you would a pig an throw it in an incinerator.

>>42207
I don't have an incinerator available to me, but that sounds like a good option.

>>42208

Even a cheap garden incinerator would do the job, though admittedly you'd probably very quickly get reported if you burned huge hunks of silicone in a built up area.

My second choice would be to hack the flesh off as our lad did, then use my angle grinder or cut off tool to cut the metal into manageable chunks. Then a trip to the local tip with a bag of scrap metal and a much more suspicious bag of plastic meat, and it'd be gone. I might also have considered finding a chemical that would dissolve or melt the silicone. But again, I'm blessed with a big, private garden and shed, so could do this all without looking odd.

I just bought the "triple chamber ball drainer" stroker from Adam & Eve (US), and it was a fantastic purchase.

I dabbled with a Flashlight when I was younger and moved into a flat on my own for the first time, but found it to be more hassle (and space) than it was worth so I cut it to bits with scissors much like serialkillerlad did to Monique. This thing is a much simpler, less bulky stroker that feels significantly better. The closed end and tight fit of the thing equates to an actual suction, whereas the Fleshlight didn't deliver on ever feeling like there was suction. The comparatively tight middle chamber is a great touch as you get noticeably different sensations between long and short strokes on this thing. I just drop some hand soap in it and run it under the tap for cleanup, easy peasy.

All of the pictures of it on their website are terrible, but I've attached the most illustrative one.

Balls thoroughly drained. If a UK outlet has a similar toy, I'd highly recommend it.

>A woman was horrified to find a sex doll inside a skip which she first thought was a dead body. Cara Levy, 26, vows to never return to Harlow Recycling Centre in Essex after spotting a life-like figure lying on a mound of household waste.

>What disturbed the business developer most about the sex doll, was how it had been dressed in underwear and was still wearing a wig when discarded. Crime buff Cara, who joked she was close to calling BBC's Luther, told the Daily Star: "It was so realistic and so grim. I’ve seen weird bits displayed in sex shops before but never in full form and never one so realistic. There was a wig on it and they also had put some underwear on it."

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird-news/sex-doll-mistaken-dead-body-25149287

Oh sexdoll-lad

>>42429
I would never. I've dismantled two dolls now but Monique remains sacred. Not distressing other people is paramount, people who throw out dolls in one piece have issues and no care for their fellow human beings. Proper cunts, in other words.

>>42456
What is the proper dismemberment technique to successfully and considerately render the corpse unrecognizable?

>>42457
Didn't we establish the flesh should be granulated and used as safety surface for kids' playgrounds? Or was that just me?

>>42458
A legacy of filth and sin beneath are kiddies very own feet.

>>42429
Well, for a start don't throw the entire doll into an open bin while still wearing knickers and a wig.

It's not rocket surgery but the steps I used were, roughly, to strip the TPE from the skeleton using a box cutter with a fresh blade (a sharp blade really helps, so I changed it as needed) and a set of solid kitchen scissors. It needs cutting into small-ish chunks anyway so I wasn't too careful about preserving the shape of anything. On the contrary, for instantly recognisable parts like hands, feet, face, and breasts I made sure to cut them into even smaller bits. The material doesn't look anything like flesh if there's no shape to fool your brain into thinking otherwise. I then bagged it into 10-20lbs portions to avoid breaking the bin bags or my back as I carried it to the bins.

The skeleton, once free of TPE, can fold in itself until it's small enough to fit in a wheely bin. This took some doing as the some joints like hips, back and neck are quite stiff. The end result looked a bit odd but unmistakeably mechanical, so there was no need to further disguise it.

It took me about an hour all told and I think that was time well worth investing to avoid scaring people.

>>42199
Don't say it...

>>42460
You really should have put the skeleton on gumtree in a university town.

>>42461
It's not at all anatomically correct, so maybe a vocational school about welding but why a university?

>>42462
Art students would love it.

>>42463
I posted in a local freecycle group. Let's see if I get any takers.