Nowt wrong with Worsley, but Ramirez is the true queen of accessible BBC Four documentaries.

>>41103
No.

>>41104

Let's be realistic here, which of the three looks like they'd be properly dirty? Lipscomb would be a dead fish, Worsley would be a good laugh in bed, but Ramirez is quite obviously into some properly nasty stuff. I don't reckon that Ruth Goodman is particularly mucky, but she'd be game for anything if you returned the favour. Still not made up my mind about Kate Williams, but she does have red hair in her favour and she's posh enough to have some weird repressed stuff going on.

I've been waiting nearly 20 years for Bettany Hughes to whisk me away on a grand tour of the classical Greek history. Which is, of course, nothing but an excuse to molest me over the summer holidays in a very classical Greek fashion. I'm beginning to think that it's not going to happen.

The last time we had this thread I spilt coffee all over my laptop which not only finally ruined it right before Christmas 2016 but also lost me 2 months of work on my thesis. Thank you for reading my blog.

Does Ellie from Countryfile count?

>>41102
Oh god she is the best.

This thread is a living advert for BBC4 - they better not shut it down.

We'd undearth the true meaning of Sodom and Gomorrah together, iykwim.

>>41109
Brainy Bird Central

>>41108

Bloody countryfiles, coming over here and diddling our country. STRING 'EM UP.

>>41108
I'd give Anita Rani a ride on my new combine harvester IYKWIM.

>>41117
I posted a picture of Nadiya the other week, and Anita Rani upon closer consideration has opened my eyes, and other things.

>>41117
She is great - would like to go on a bracing country walk with her.

>>41147
For that you want Julia Bradbury and her RIGHT PRIME ARSE.

>>41154
My absolute favourite.

>>41156
Why are you trying to force this.

>>41157

What did I miss? I love a forced meme.

>>41158
The same underage lass that gets sporadically posted here.

Pure filth.

>>41160

Kate Bliss is the fittest antiques bird, even if her face is a bit too wide.

>>41161
The world of daytime antiques programming has more than its fair share of gorgeous women.

>>41159

It's Naomi Seibt. She's about 25.

>>41163

19, according to The Mail. She looks genetically subnormal though.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8040469/German-teenage-climate-change-denier-Naomi-Seibt-19-known-anti-Greta-speak-CPAC.html

>>41163
And thick as mince to boot. Not a candidate here.

>>41164

I surely can't be the only person who feels like global environmental issues shouldn't be lead exclusively by teenage girls with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders

>>41166
Why not? It's only a problem if you obsessively make it a problem.

>>41167

Because I presume there are people more qualified in every measurable sense to perform that role.

If your ideal champion for a cause is a zealot, ignorant of all possible doubts and weaknesses in their philosophy than by all means these are the correct choices.

But if you want a realistic representation of the problem, the evidence and the solutions to a problem you are far from the best choice. Make no mistake they are part of the same cultural disease that makes an obnoxious reality TV star president of the United States, one that disregards merit in favour of memes.

>>41168
I thought the problem was you don't want to fuck her because she has "FAS"? Shut the fuck up, you're talking such nonsense. "Zealot" implies a faith aspect in Thunberg's climate rhetoric which isn't the case, it's all real.

I want to press your face into an industrial sander and watch your head turn to jam, stupid sexist prick.

>>41168

Who said she was an ideal champion? She's just doing her thing. Only "ideal" in so far as she's doing good work; someone doing better would be even more ideal. We can't just switch her out for someone you find more attractive, that's not how reality works. That your response to this is to post images of the oil-company sponsored, loli looking one while spouting vague science denying statements because she makes your dick twitch is neither here nor there.

>>41169
Froth from his mouth.
Steam from his ears.
You've done it now, lad.
You've trolled him to tears.

>>41170
>"Zealot" implies a faith aspect in Thunberg's climate rhetoric which isn't the case, it's all real.

People have faith in things that are real all the time, you ask the average person on the street how they know a bunch of things are 'real' that are actually 'real' they won't have a fucking clue they will stare at you blankly.

You ask them "what the most abundant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere is?" and a tiny fraction would say water, I am willing to bet that you didn't even know water was a greenhouse gas until I just said it, and you won't accept it as a fact coming from me because you decided I am on the wrong side of your faith.

Because it doesn't really matter a lot of time if people know why they should believe something as long as they believe the correct thing.

Most people operate off of faith for most things, and argue based on faith even when those things are real.

>because she has "FAS"
I think they both have FAS that is why I made the observation

>>41170
>Who said she was an ideal champion? She's just doing her thing
Appearing in the papers regularly is more than just her thing. She has a full cult of personality now.

>at your response to this is to post images of the oil-company sponsored

I didn't do that at all you projecting cretin. I think they are both fucking clowns and having let one clown in means another clown is allowed to come in and the whole thing is being allowed to become a circus when it should be the purview of climate scientists telling us the best course of action. And you are more of a clown for not being able to comprehend that.

>>41173
You're so rational. I wish I could be one of your many mates.

My thoughts on this are as follows: she's a spacker who someone, likely a simp of hers, seems intent on forcing here.

You lot are way behind on this thread anyway. She's more than David can handle, surely?

Like Angela Rayner if she actually had a functioning brain.

Massively underrated. It helps I've got a thing for soft Manc and South Yorks accents.

Used to do do the weather, degree in astrophysics. I love are Sarah.

>>41207
She is fit.

Dr Suzannah Lipscomb

Kathy Sykes who was on that Rough Science show years ago. I'd give her rough science (biology) IYKWIM.

Philippa used to make Robot Wars worth watching. She unfortunately looks uncomfortably like Emma Kennedy now.

>>41297
Cross her with Sarah Lancashire and you've pretty much got my mum.

>>41208 She's got a cracking pair too.

Emily Graslie off of Prehistoric Road Trip and also the internet.

It's her accent too.

>>41344
Jesus. Such women always make me smile.

Here's legendary classical pianist Martha Argerich in the '60s.

Back to Robot Wars.

>>41302
God, I really have a crush on this image. Every time i scroll past it i gaze for a moment.

>>41353
And now she's gone. Oh well.

I'd give her some high-energy particle physics IYKWIM

>>41351
I wish the world had more brunettes that are slightly on the spectrum.

Phwoar I'd give her a big problem with my straight edge IYKWIM.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2c0P2CEU9A

>>41358
Phwoar I'd check her definitions IYKWIM.

She could honestly crossover to the fitter now she's older thread. The lovely Susanna's 49.

>>41456
I'd have said she was too much of a bimbo for this thread.

>>41457
I was going to say the same thing, so I'm glad you did.

She is very attractive, but I'm afraid a bit thick.

>>41475

She reminds me an awful lot of my first proper girlfriend from Year 10. Definitely would.

She is a lezzer though, and I have forseen a future wherein she's at the centre of a Twitter scandal for being an accused TERF.

>>41477
What are you talking about? She's married to a man and one of her best mates is ContraPoints.

Also adding ContraPoints to the thread. Specifically goth Contra.

I'd very much like to go on an extended travelling holiday with Dr Alice Roberts where we can discuss the wonders of human anatomy. Something that involves overnight trains and hiking.

>>41475
If she's so clever than how come she's dressing like a sultry schoolteacher for patreon money?

>>41478

I'm sure one of her videos had her partner in and it was this little tubby weeaboo girl. Maybe I'm getting mixed up. I also have no idea what exactly Contrapoints is because I've never watched it.

But I can still see Ellis getting un-personed one day, because she has actual principles and values based on her own knowledge and independent thought, as opposed to just following the will of the hivemind. Such is the way with many of these "Breadtube" types.

>>41480
She doesn't I just cherry picked some frames from a video of hers where you can see her clevage because I'm a massive sad act.

>>41482
I think you're being a bit bonkers, honestly.

As a working class bloke who accidentally became financially aligned with the middle classes, youtube videos involving posh women talking about their aga lifestyle are more potent stimulation than any hardcore pornography ever could be. I can only assume to her, watching someone like myself mixing concrete or digging a ditch would be similarly exciting.

>>41487

Oh christ. That accent. She's wearing pearl earrings and an alice band. I want to sniff her farts.

>>41488

She has that look in her eye that makes me want to get a job as her rough hewn northern gardener boy, despite being a man in his 30s with a skin care routine and probably a similar income as her husband.

But I can still crank up the geordie accent, it'll be reet. She has a video on how to tie a Stock properly for when you're following the hounds side saddle. I don't even fucking know what that means, but it's turning me on.

>>41487
My God, it's like an issue of Country Life has assumed human form.

>>41489

Watching that video gives me a throbbing hard-on some insight into empire - I'd do whatever she told me to do, just because she seems like she should be in charge especially if she tells me to lick her spicy arsehole.

You lot have gone wrong.

>>41491

I want her to dress me up as a fox and tell me she's going to hang my pelt on the wall after killing me for sport IYKWIM

>>41491
Why is she making these videos? Who are her audience on YouTube?

>>41494

She's a kept woman who needs a hobby. I'm not complaining.

>>41492

We were born wrong, that's why we're here.

>>41494

I've only briefly investigated between raging powerful wanks but it seems her audience is about 5% likeminded british poshos and 95% septics who think everyone in Britain lives like that.

I dunno why, but this posh bird chat has reminded me of Mistress Evilyne. Don't Google her, you'll regret it.

>>41498
>Don't Google her, you'll regret it.
Meh.

>>41499
>Hardsports
This and watersports, why do they call them sports? They don't involve arguing over whether trans people should be allowed to take part.

>>41500

It's a pre-internet thing, from the days of contact magazines and classified adverts in the local paper. The jargon of punting ("O-levels, A-levels, OWO, CIM") offered a level of semi-plausible deniability about what was being offered.

>>41499
What's the appeal of eating shit? It doesn't taste nice.

>>41502
The more aroused you are, the less your disgust-response kicks in and to some degree it's replaced by a thrill; same reason you get off on putting your mouth on the place your partners piss out of and feel ashamed of yourself when you go to close the tabs of your porn. Only in some people, it goes into overdrive. There's probably some sort of related sexual-development trigger in some cases too, same reason anything gets fetishised but in those instances is related to shitting.

>>41501

Thanks.

Honestly, I think I'd rather eat shit than get into the "findom" stuff that seems popular in the dominatrix scene these days. I don't really understand either, but I can think of nothing less sexy than sending a lass £200 on paypal and her taking the piss out of me for it. I'd probably pay decent money for a femdom session with a posho bird if I wasn't able to find such antics elsewhere, but just sitting at home filling out account details on Halifax seems like the least erotic thing I can imagine.

Maybe it's a class thing. I don't have money to burn, I earned this stuff.

>>41499
What's ball busting? Is it giving someone a case of serious blue balls or is it actually attacking someone's balls? I really wouldn't enjoy having my balls attacked.

>>41505

>>41506
BUT WHY?

>>41504
>Findom
>Findom is an abbreviated form of the term Financial Domination.
How is this even a thing?

>>41508
You're surprised by the lengths people will go to to get off?

>>41508
I find findom to be the weirdest of all the recent kinks I've heard about - look on Twitter and see how many people are apparently doing it. I've rationalised it that if you're so sad that you never get any attention from women at all, paying for them to take the piss out of you for sending them money is at least something. I guess a few of the findoms actually send nudes, maybe? I don't get it.

>>41511
Went to uni recently with a girl that did some findom stuff on the side and had a few "pay pigs" at her mercy. She essentially described it as having a sugar daddy with extra steps.

>>41511

From what I've seen, they seem to get off on being so pathetic that they are able to be coerced into sending women a load of money for basically nothing. Often, part of the shtick is that it's a lot of money - enough money to actually have a financial impact on the bloke (whether or not that part is just fantasy, I'm not sure, but I have seen references to making them bankrupt etc).

I understand the scene, in general. I liked it a lot when my ex would spit in my mouth and call me a slut, I understand why humiliation and power exchange is sexy. But paying bills is not sexy and never will be. Maybe I just grew up with too much financial anxiety to ever find it appealing, I don't think anything could make me softer than wondering if this bint in latex was going to make me accrue unarranged overdraft charges.

On the other hand, I sort of do see the opposite sort of power play being quite stimulating - chucking a few hundred quid at a 20 year old student lass like it's nothing would at the very least make me feel like a flash git. But then I sort of assume the sugar daddy craic is that you do actually get to shag the lass, at the very least?

That's why I wouldn't ever pay for a dominatrix, despite the fact I'd probably fucking definitely enjoy it, for the same reason I don't go to strip clubs - I don't see the appeal in paying all that money and then still having to go home for a wank.

>>41511

It's basically a scam really. It's just a scam where the victims are given the illusion, or deceive themselves even, of thinking they're getting something out of it. You see a few absolutely hollow and blatant examples where they outright state you'll be all but ignored and just send them money. But that's just EXTRA cruel domination, right?

Well, no, no it isn't love. The power is firmly in the hands of the bloke paying you- He's just a particularly tragic idiot. I don't know if it annoys me more that there are blokes out there both pathetic and wealthy enough to fall for it, or the fact so many people will defend it in the same manner as Bathwater Gamer Girl.

>>41516

Actually, this image basically sums up my thoughts on the subject better than I could in text.

The kid is the paypig and the boot is the findomme, but as you can see, he is holding it against his own head

>>41511
>>41514
>>41516
I'm sorry, but that is just pathetic. There's something wrong with them. It is much worse than the bathwater girl, and I thought THAT was highest level of pathetic.

>>41522
>the bathwater girl

Oh my fucking christ, I didn't even know about this.

>>41522
Presumably they're fine with it as these women are approached by these men in the first place with the express intention of becoming "paypigs".

I tend to keep my nose out of other people's wank fantasies; something of a general rule for life.

>>41516
>It's just a scam where the victims are given the illusion, or deceive themselves even, of thinking they're getting something out of it.
If they think they're getting something out of it but that something is psychological anyway, then they are getting something out of it. It's essentially psychosomatic.

>>41514
>I don't think anything could make me softer than wondering if this bint in latex was going to make me accrue unarranged overdraft charges.
Maybe the extended payoff plays into it. Like the shame thing when you close those tabs of porn, except it's further down the line and makes the interaction less temporary and forgetable.

>>41525

That's pretty much my point, hence the image I posted after that. It's all self-actualised. If they get off over throwing their money away for nothing, they could instead donate it to a homeless charity and have a wank over it.

Or I could just mug them, I bet that would be the ultimate turn on. I'm such a cruel evil findomme that I'm not even a fit bird, I'm a beardy 30-something bloke with a hairy arse crack. You naughty boy, letting me hit you in the face and nick your debit card like that.

[spoiler]Okay full disclosure when I was unemployed in my early 20s I operated a fake Fetlife "findomme" account to get strangers to buy me shit on an Amazon wishlist. Some of it was make-up, hair straighteners, etc which I'd just stick on eBay, but I also scored a laptop and a couple of phones. I just asked my girlfriend (at the time) to pose whenever they insisted on pictures, and obviously none of them were ever nudes. These men are just suckers asking to be ripped off and that's why I can't respect them honestly.[/spoilers]

>>41527

Bastard, I fucked the spoiler tag up good and proper.

>>41527
>If they get off over throwing their money away for nothing, they could instead donate it to a homeless charity and have a wank over it.
But they don't, they're paying to have a fantasy fulfilled and, so long as they can believe it, or at least suspend disbelief, that fantasy is being fulfilled. You didn't scam those men, you got them off.

>>41528
Seems appropriate somehow.

>>41527
I always suspected this was the case - I'm quite sure that many of the most successful onlyfans accounts are double-acts in the same way.

>>41529

I mean sure, that's why it worked isn't it?

The thing is I suspect many, if not all, of them would quite strongly disagree if the thought had actually occurred to them that they might not be talking to the hot young thing they thought they were.

>>41531
Maybe they are mostly stupid boomers who would use an excel spreadsheet as a national database.

I'm not sure if she counts, but she should.

>>41602

Her mam was fitter.

>>41603
For me Blue Peter peaked with Katy Hill.

>>41604
Her peaked hills made my peter blue IYKWIM

>>41604
>For me Blue Peter peaked with Katy Hill.

I don't know how you think it is acceptable to come into /x/ and say this kind of thing.

I don't walk into your church and start proselytizing how Jesus probably isn't the son of god and judaism is the only true abrahamic do I?

And don't act like you didn't know, her face is on the door.

>>41606
We don't post The Huq any more out of respect for ARE Charlie.

>>41606
How I long to Fuq Huq.

>>41608
The q is silent so that just sounds weird.

>>41606

I've got to be honest - in a game of shag/marry/kill, I'm marrying Huq and shagging Hill. Kill Leslie, obviously.

>>41610
John really can't catch a break.

>>41611
On the day he was found not guilt of groping Ulrika posted a naked selfie with a captain about reclaiming her body. He can't catch a break.

>>41612

That woman needs a big plate of chips.

>>41610
I only remember Connie, Matt, and the short-haired lassie. Matt seems like a lovely bloke so I'd marry him, I think I'd actually go for the short-haired lassie, I can't remember her name so she seems more mysterious and interesting than Connie who imo is overrated.

>>41614
Liz. Not my cup of tea.

>>41523

I don't understand the pricing on the last one.

Obviously she's decided it takes 2.5k to shag her, but why that specific amount? Doesn't make sense even with VAT.

>>41175

Eugh. So witty ,so impassioned, so much fun, looks fantastic. ; _ ;

>>41621
>Obviously she's decided it takes 2.5k to shag her, but why that specific amount? Doesn't make sense even with VAT.

How would you propose deciding how much someone else should pay to shag you?

>>41622

Market rate of competitors, supply and demand and disposable income of potential buyers, one would presume.

Knobbing Belle, is a premium inelastic product so I would say this price is quite reasonable with consideration of those forces.

https://youtu.be/Fe4O5WqC-6E

>>41624
That is very enjoyable and fascinating. As he says, we all need the OnlyFans money.

>>41622

I just mean the figure, it's £2,115.50. That's...odd. Comes to £2,538.60.

I just find that very strange. Doesn't appear to be a meme number or reference.

>>41627
The site takes a cut of 20% if that helps explain it. I'm not going to do any maths but I don't think it does.