Let's be realistic here, which of the three looks like they'd be properly dirty? Lipscomb would be a dead fish, Worsley would be a good laugh in bed, but Ramirez is quite obviously into some properly nasty stuff. I don't reckon that Ruth Goodman is particularly mucky, but she'd be game for anything if you returned the favour. Still not made up my mind about Kate Williams, but she does have red hair in her favour and she's posh enough to have some weird repressed stuff going on.
I've been waiting nearly 20 years for Bettany Hughes to whisk me away on a grand tour of the classical Greek history. Which is, of course, nothing but an excuse to molest me over the summer holidays in a very classical Greek fashion. I'm beginning to think that it's not going to happen.
The last time we had this thread I spilt coffee all over my laptop which not only finally ruined it right before Christmas 2016 but also lost me 2 months of work on my thesis. Thank you for reading my blog.
I surely can't be the only person who feels like global environmental issues shouldn't be lead exclusively by teenage girls with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders
Because I presume there are people more qualified in every measurable sense to perform that role.
If your ideal champion for a cause is a zealot, ignorant of all possible doubts and weaknesses in their philosophy than by all means these are the correct choices.
But if you want a realistic representation of the problem, the evidence and the solutions to a problem you are far from the best choice. Make no mistake they are part of the same cultural disease that makes an obnoxious reality TV star president of the United States, one that disregards merit in favour of memes.
>>41168 I thought the problem was you don't want to fuck her because she has "FAS"? Shut the fuck up, you're talking such nonsense. "Zealot" implies a faith aspect in Thunberg's climate rhetoric which isn't the case, it's all real.
I want to press your face into an industrial sander and watch your head turn to jam, stupid sexist prick.
Who said she was an ideal champion? She's just doing her thing. Only "ideal" in so far as she's doing good work; someone doing better would be even more ideal. We can't just switch her out for someone you find more attractive, that's not how reality works. That your response to this is to post images of the oil-company sponsored, loli looking one while spouting vague science denying statements because she makes your dick twitch is neither here nor there.
>>41170 >"Zealot" implies a faith aspect in Thunberg's climate rhetoric which isn't the case, it's all real.
People have faith in things that are real all the time, you ask the average person on the street how they know a bunch of things are 'real' that are actually 'real' they won't have a fucking clue they will stare at you blankly.
You ask them "what the most abundant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere is?" and a tiny fraction would say water, I am willing to bet that you didn't even know water was a greenhouse gas until I just said it, and you won't accept it as a fact coming from me because you decided I am on the wrong side of your faith.
Because it doesn't really matter a lot of time if people know why they should believe something as long as they believe the correct thing.
Most people operate off of faith for most things, and argue based on faith even when those things are real.
>because she has "FAS"
I think they both have FAS that is why I made the observation
>>41170 >Who said she was an ideal champion? She's just doing her thing
Appearing in the papers regularly is more than just her thing. She has a full cult of personality now.
>at your response to this is to post images of the oil-company sponsored
I didn't do that at all you projecting cretin. I think they are both fucking clowns and having let one clown in means another clown is allowed to come in and the whole thing is being allowed to become a circus when it should be the purview of climate scientists telling us the best course of action. And you are more of a clown for not being able to comprehend that.
