- Files: GIF, JPG, PNG, Maximum:5000 KB, Thumbnails: 600x600 pixels
- Currently 2587 unique user posts. View catalogue
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ First 100 posts ] [ Last 50 posts ]
Posting mode: Reply[ Reply ]
Expand all images.
|>>|| No. 41105
Let's be realistic here, which of the three looks like they'd be properly dirty? Lipscomb would be a dead fish, Worsley would be a good laugh in bed, but Ramirez is quite obviously into some properly nasty stuff. I don't reckon that Ruth Goodman is particularly mucky, but she'd be game for anything if you returned the favour. Still not made up my mind about Kate Williams, but she does have red hair in her favour and she's posh enough to have some weird repressed stuff going on.
|>>|| No. 41106
I've been waiting nearly 20 years for Bettany Hughes to whisk me away on a grand tour of the classical Greek history. Which is, of course, nothing but an excuse to molest me over the summer holidays in a very classical Greek fashion. I'm beginning to think that it's not going to happen.
The last time we had this thread I spilt coffee all over my laptop which not only finally ruined it right before Christmas 2016 but also lost me 2 months of work on my thesis. Thank you for reading my blog.
|>>|| No. 41109
Oh god she is the best.
This thread is a living advert for BBC4 - they better not shut it down.
|>>|| No. 41116
Bloody countryfiles, coming over here and diddling our country. STRING 'EM UP.
|>>|| No. 41119
I posted a picture of Nadiya the other week, and Anita Rani upon closer consideration has opened my eyes, and other things.
|>>|| No. 41161
Kate Bliss is the fittest antiques bird, even if her face is a bit too wide.
|>>|| No. 41166
I surely can't be the only person who feels like global environmental issues shouldn't be lead exclusively by teenage girls with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders
|>>|| No. 41168
Because I presume there are people more qualified in every measurable sense to perform that role.
If your ideal champion for a cause is a zealot, ignorant of all possible doubts and weaknesses in their philosophy than by all means these are the correct choices.
But if you want a realistic representation of the problem, the evidence and the solutions to a problem you are far from the best choice. Make no mistake they are part of the same cultural disease that makes an obnoxious reality TV star president of the United States, one that disregards merit in favour of memes.
|>>|| No. 41169
I thought the problem was you don't want to fuck her because she has "FAS"? Shut the fuck up, you're talking such nonsense. "Zealot" implies a faith aspect in Thunberg's climate rhetoric which isn't the case, it's all real.
I want to press your face into an industrial sander and watch your head turn to jam, stupid sexist prick.
|>>|| No. 41170
Who said she was an ideal champion? She's just doing her thing. Only "ideal" in so far as she's doing good work; someone doing better would be even more ideal. We can't just switch her out for someone you find more attractive, that's not how reality works. That your response to this is to post images of the oil-company sponsored, loli looking one while spouting vague science denying statements because she makes your dick twitch is neither here nor there.
|>>|| No. 41171
Froth from his mouth.
Steam from his ears.
You've done it now, lad.
You've trolled him to tears.
|>>|| No. 41173
>"Zealot" implies a faith aspect in Thunberg's climate rhetoric which isn't the case, it's all real.
People have faith in things that are real all the time, you ask the average person on the street how they know a bunch of things are 'real' that are actually 'real' they won't have a fucking clue they will stare at you blankly.
You ask them "what the most abundant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere is?" and a tiny fraction would say water, I am willing to bet that you didn't even know water was a greenhouse gas until I just said it, and you won't accept it as a fact coming from me because you decided I am on the wrong side of your faith.
Because it doesn't really matter a lot of time if people know why they should believe something as long as they believe the correct thing.
Most people operate off of faith for most things, and argue based on faith even when those things are real.
>because she has "FAS"
I think they both have FAS that is why I made the observation
>Who said she was an ideal champion? She's just doing her thing
Appearing in the papers regularly is more than just her thing. She has a full cult of personality now.
>at your response to this is to post images of the oil-company sponsored
I didn't do that at all you projecting cretin. I think they are both fucking clowns and having let one clown in means another clown is allowed to come in and the whole thing is being allowed to become a circus when it should be the purview of climate scientists telling us the best course of action. And you are more of a clown for not being able to comprehend that.
|>>|| No. 41175
My thoughts on this are as follows: she's a spacker who someone, likely a simp of hers, seems intent on forcing here.
You lot are way behind on this thread anyway. She's more than David can handle, surely?
|>>|| No. 41353
God, I really have a crush on this image. Every time i scroll past it i gaze for a moment.
|>>|| No. 41356
Phwoar I'd give her a big problem with my straight edge IYKWIM.
|>>|| No. 41458
I was going to say the same thing, so I'm glad you did.
She is very attractive, but I'm afraid a bit thick.
|>>|| No. 41477
She reminds me an awful lot of my first proper girlfriend from Year 10. Definitely would.
She is a lezzer though, and I have forseen a future wherein she's at the centre of a Twitter scandal for being an accused TERF.
|>>|| No. 41480
I'd very much like to go on an extended travelling holiday with Dr Alice Roberts where we can discuss the wonders of human anatomy. Something that involves overnight trains and hiking.
If she's so clever than how come she's dressing like a sultry schoolteacher for patreon money?
|>>|| No. 41482
I'm sure one of her videos had her partner in and it was this little tubby weeaboo girl. Maybe I'm getting mixed up. I also have no idea what exactly Contrapoints is because I've never watched it.
But I can still see Ellis getting un-personed one day, because she has actual principles and values based on her own knowledge and independent thought, as opposed to just following the will of the hivemind. Such is the way with many of these "Breadtube" types.
|>>|| No. 41483
She doesn't I just cherry picked some frames from a video of hers where you can see her clevage because I'm a massive sad act.
I think you're being a bit bonkers, honestly.
|>>|| No. 41487
As a working class bloke who accidentally became financially aligned with the middle classes, youtube videos involving posh women talking about their aga lifestyle are more potent stimulation than any hardcore pornography ever could be. I can only assume to her, watching someone like myself mixing concrete or digging a ditch would be similarly exciting.
|>>|| No. 41488
Oh christ. That accent. She's wearing pearl earrings and an alice band. I want to sniff her farts.
|>>|| No. 41489
She has that look in her eye that makes me want to get a job as her rough hewn northern gardener boy, despite being a man in his 30s with a skin care routine and probably a similar income as her husband.
But I can still crank up the geordie accent, it'll be reet. She has a video on how to tie a Stock properly for when you're following the hounds side saddle. I don't even fucking know what that means, but it's turning me on.
|>>|| No. 41491
Watching that video gives me a throbbing hard-on some insight into empire - I'd do whatever she told me to do, just because she seems like she should be in charge especially if she tells me to lick her spicy arsehole.
|>>|| No. 41493
I want her to dress me up as a fox and tell me she's going to hang my pelt on the wall after killing me for sport IYKWIM
|>>|| No. 41497
I've only briefly investigated between raging powerful wanks but it seems her audience is about 5% likeminded british poshos and 95% septics who think everyone in Britain lives like that.
|>>|| No. 41498
I dunno why, but this posh bird chat has reminded me of Mistress Evilyne. Don't Google her, you'll regret it.
|>>|| No. 41500
This and watersports, why do they call them sports? They don't involve arguing over whether trans people should be allowed to take part.
|>>|| No. 41501
It's a pre-internet thing, from the days of contact magazines and classified adverts in the local paper. The jargon of punting ("O-levels, A-levels, OWO, CIM") offered a level of semi-plausible deniability about what was being offered.
|>>|| No. 41503
The more aroused you are, the less your disgust-response kicks in and to some degree it's replaced by a thrill; same reason you get off on putting your mouth on the place your partners piss out of and feel ashamed of yourself when you go to close the tabs of your porn. Only in some people, it goes into overdrive. There's probably some sort of related sexual-development trigger in some cases too, same reason anything gets fetishised but in those instances is related to shitting.
|>>|| No. 41504
Honestly, I think I'd rather eat shit than get into the "findom" stuff that seems popular in the dominatrix scene these days. I don't really understand either, but I can think of nothing less sexy than sending a lass £200 on paypal and her taking the piss out of me for it. I'd probably pay decent money for a femdom session with a posho bird if I wasn't able to find such antics elsewhere, but just sitting at home filling out account details on Halifax seems like the least erotic thing I can imagine.
Maybe it's a class thing. I don't have money to burn, I earned this stuff.
|>>|| No. 41505
What's ball busting? Is it giving someone a case of serious blue balls or is it actually attacking someone's balls? I really wouldn't enjoy having my balls attacked.
|>>|| No. 41508
>Findom is an abbreviated form of the term Financial Domination.
How is this even a thing?
|>>|| No. 41511
I find findom to be the weirdest of all the recent kinks I've heard about - look on Twitter and see how many people are apparently doing it. I've rationalised it that if you're so sad that you never get any attention from women at all, paying for them to take the piss out of you for sending them money is at least something. I guess a few of the findoms actually send nudes, maybe? I don't get it.
|>>|| No. 41512
Went to uni recently with a girl that did some findom stuff on the side and had a few "pay pigs" at her mercy. She essentially described it as having a sugar daddy with extra steps.
|>>|| No. 41514
From what I've seen, they seem to get off on being so pathetic that they are able to be coerced into sending women a load of money for basically nothing. Often, part of the shtick is that it's a lot of money - enough money to actually have a financial impact on the bloke (whether or not that part is just fantasy, I'm not sure, but I have seen references to making them bankrupt etc).
I understand the scene, in general. I liked it a lot when my ex would spit in my mouth and call me a slut, I understand why humiliation and power exchange is sexy. But paying bills is not sexy and never will be. Maybe I just grew up with too much financial anxiety to ever find it appealing, I don't think anything could make me softer than wondering if this bint in latex was going to make me accrue unarranged overdraft charges.
On the other hand, I sort of do see the opposite sort of power play being quite stimulating - chucking a few hundred quid at a 20 year old student lass like it's nothing would at the very least make me feel like a flash git. But then I sort of assume the sugar daddy craic is that you do actually get to shag the lass, at the very least?
That's why I wouldn't ever pay for a dominatrix, despite the fact I'd probably fucking definitely enjoy it, for the same reason I don't go to strip clubs - I don't see the appeal in paying all that money and then still having to go home for a wank.
|>>|| No. 41516
It's basically a scam really. It's just a scam where the victims are given the illusion, or deceive themselves even, of thinking they're getting something out of it. You see a few absolutely hollow and blatant examples where they outright state you'll be all but ignored and just send them money. But that's just EXTRA cruel domination, right?
Well, no, no it isn't love. The power is firmly in the hands of the bloke paying you- He's just a particularly tragic idiot. I don't know if it annoys me more that there are blokes out there both pathetic and wealthy enough to fall for it, or the fact so many people will defend it in the same manner as Bathwater Gamer Girl.
|>>|| No. 41517
Actually, this image basically sums up my thoughts on the subject better than I could in text.
The kid is the paypig and the boot is the findomme, but as you can see, he is holding it against his own head
|>>|| No. 41522
I'm sorry, but that is just pathetic. There's something wrong with them. It is much worse than the bathwater girl, and I thought THAT was highest level of pathetic.
|>>|| No. 41524
Presumably they're fine with it as these women are approached by these men in the first place with the express intention of becoming "paypigs".
I tend to keep my nose out of other people's wank fantasies; something of a general rule for life.
|>>|| No. 41525
>It's just a scam where the victims are given the illusion, or deceive themselves even, of thinking they're getting something out of it.
If they think they're getting something out of it but that something is psychological anyway, then they are getting something out of it. It's essentially psychosomatic.
|>>|| No. 41526
>I don't think anything could make me softer than wondering if this bint in latex was going to make me accrue unarranged overdraft charges.
Maybe the extended payoff plays into it. Like the shame thing when you close those tabs of porn, except it's further down the line and makes the interaction less temporary and forgetable.
|>>|| No. 41527
That's pretty much my point, hence the image I posted after that. It's all self-actualised. If they get off over throwing their money away for nothing, they could instead donate it to a homeless charity and have a wank over it.
Or I could just mug them, I bet that would be the ultimate turn on. I'm such a cruel evil findomme that I'm not even a fit bird, I'm a beardy 30-something bloke with a hairy arse crack. You naughty boy, letting me hit you in the face and nick your debit card like that.
[spoiler]Okay full disclosure when I was unemployed in my early 20s I operated a fake Fetlife "findomme" account to get strangers to buy me shit on an Amazon wishlist. Some of it was make-up, hair straighteners, etc which I'd just stick on eBay, but I also scored a laptop and a couple of phones. I just asked my girlfriend (at the time) to pose whenever they insisted on pictures, and obviously none of them were ever nudes. These men are just suckers asking to be ripped off and that's why I can't respect them honestly.[/spoilers]
|>>|| No. 41529
>If they get off over throwing their money away for nothing, they could instead donate it to a homeless charity and have a wank over it.
But they don't, they're paying to have a fantasy fulfilled and, so long as they can believe it, or at least suspend disbelief, that fantasy is being fulfilled. You didn't scam those men, you got them off.
|>>|| No. 41530
Seems appropriate somehow.
I always suspected this was the case - I'm quite sure that many of the most successful onlyfans accounts are double-acts in the same way.
|>>|| No. 41531
I mean sure, that's why it worked isn't it?
The thing is I suspect many, if not all, of them would quite strongly disagree if the thought had actually occurred to them that they might not be talking to the hot young thing they thought they were.
|>>|| No. 41532
Maybe they are mostly stupid boomers who would use an excel spreadsheet as a national database.
|>>|| No. 41606
>For me Blue Peter peaked with Katy Hill.
I don't know how you think it is acceptable to come into /x/ and say this kind of thing.
I don't walk into your church and start proselytizing how Jesus probably isn't the son of god and judaism is the only true abrahamic do I?
And don't act like you didn't know, her face is on the door.
|>>|| No. 41610
I've got to be honest - in a game of shag/marry/kill, I'm marrying Huq and shagging Hill. Kill Leslie, obviously.
|>>|| No. 41614
I only remember Connie, Matt, and the short-haired lassie. Matt seems like a lovely bloke so I'd marry him, I think I'd actually go for the short-haired lassie, I can't remember her name so she seems more mysterious and interesting than Connie who imo is overrated.
|>>|| No. 41621
I don't understand the pricing on the last one.
Obviously she's decided it takes 2.5k to shag her, but why that specific amount? Doesn't make sense even with VAT.
Eugh. So witty ,so impassioned, so much fun, looks fantastic. ; _ ;
|>>|| No. 41622
>Obviously she's decided it takes 2.5k to shag her, but why that specific amount? Doesn't make sense even with VAT.
How would you propose deciding how much someone else should pay to shag you?
|>>|| No. 41623
Market rate of competitors, supply and demand and disposable income of potential buyers, one would presume.
Knobbing Belle, is a premium inelastic product so I would say this price is quite reasonable with consideration of those forces.
|>>|| No. 41625
That is very enjoyable and fascinating. As he says, we all need the OnlyFans money.
|>>|| No. 41627
I just mean the figure, it's £2,115.50. That's...odd. Comes to £2,538.60.
I just find that very strange. Doesn't appear to be a meme number or reference.
|>>|| No. 41628
The site takes a cut of 20% if that helps explain it. I'm not going to do any maths but I don't think it does.
|>>|| No. 41629
Agreed. I've fucked around on uktaxcalculators and I can't make it round up to anything or be a particularly remarkable figure.
The reason why I'm out on this particular opportunity is because you pay first and negotiate later; I want the fixed price option with the 100% "treat her like a human fleshlight for 24hrs" guarantee.
|>>|| No. 41631
Why are you mongs so hung up on what is pretty obviously just a randomly chosen figure?
|>>|| No. 41632
We need to have a whip-round/gofundme and one of us needs to take one for the team.
|>>|| No. 41633
I don't even understand how he saw those numbers.
I checked the support pages and the fees aren't that high (and the percentages are in addition to a flat fee).
|>>|| No. 41634
>I don't even understand how he saw those numbers.
Well that's the answer right there, isn't it? $2,500 vs £2115.50. The exchange rate plus VAT.
|>>|| No. 41635
This is like the bicycle scene in A Scanner Darkly.
|>>|| No. 41638
I'll take that as a compliment, it's a more interesting sort of banter than most people's.
|>>|| No. 41640
I was thinking about it. I wanted to shag the resident .gs prozzie to post a review but forgot about it.
Like otherlad says, I don't like that it's not expressly stated. I really can't be arsed to be negotiating sex with a woman I just gave two grand. I don't want to recreate my previous relationship.
|>>|| No. 41641
Between her various ventures, she's pocketing the best part of a million quid a month and she hasn't even got her growler out. There's no way on god's green earth that she'll bang you for a paltry two grand.
|>>|| No. 41647
Barely recognised her. Fantastic, though.
Don't know if I could bring myself to shag someone with a Halfords product range, though. I had to turn down Boardman for the same reason.
|>>|| No. 41649
She took less than a minute to personally reply to my email about the weird price; not like a "real" celebrity where it's literally impossible to start a one-on-one conversation with them. I reckon if you're thoroughly motivated and a good talker you could be in there with a shot.
|>>|| No. 41652
And yes. Why would she pass off the social-interaction stuff to someone else when that's what's making her money in the first place: her skill at it? Just because someone's making a million quid a month doesn't mean they're going to start creating jobs needlessly.
|>>|| No. 41653
Zoella got in a spot of bother earlier this year because it emerged that she'd put the lackey she employs to do exactly this sort of thing for her on furlough despite continuing to vlog and win lucrative advertising deals.
Posting this picture of the PA because it looks a bit like a bukkake shot.
|>>|| No. 41654
The "popular" non-lewd vloggers depend on product placement and advertising though, and that in turn depends on dealing with a lot of marketing and PR types, so not surprised at all if Zoella had someone like that.
I'm with >>41652 - not surprised if Belle Delphine does it herself, the product is her interactions with others.
|>>|| No. 41655
From what I've seen of her "content" she does very much seem like a one woman band, which to be fair, does make her continued success all the more impressive, I suppose, though I do doubt her longevity, she doesn't seem to be that creative in the actual videos she's selling (which are also leaked all over the place, so she's not bothering to file takedowns either).
Obviously, you do not at all need to have longevity if you make 12 million in your first year of operation, so I'm sure once she retires she and I will settle down on a private island shaped like an anime character or whatever she's into.
|>>|| No. 41656
>she doesn't seem to be that creative in the actual videos she's selling
She must be taking hundreds of "unique polaroids" every day, not much energy left there to be creative in other ways. There are only so many poses you can do.
|>>|| No. 41657
>not much energy left there to be creative in other way
I don't think the e-girl genre is that creative per se, it's entirely derivative of other forms, rather than unique in any way. She is doing fantastically well out of it, so I'm not surprised she has a bit of a production-line - the clever part is the simple personalisation of each picture/message to each person buying it, but that isn't difficult or time-consuming. She knows her market very well.
|>>|| No. 41658
I still don't really know what an E-girl is, but as a cam model she's pretty poor. But then again I'm absolutely not her market, so I'm not really trying to critique her or detract from her success.
|>>|| No. 41659
I think there's a lot of luck that went into her blowing up in the first place but I don't begrudge her any of it; as far as exploitative capitalism goes she's not charging anyone for anything they couldn't live without and the amount of waste it results in (an insignificant amount of water, a few jars, some recyclable photographs and envelopes) is nothing compared to pretty much any other business with comparable revenue. There's a little merch but it's not as though her income relies on the plastic generated by hundreds of thousands of funko pops.
|>>|| No. 41660
The thing is it's not her being exploited, it's her customers. Our modern generation hasn't known anything else so they don't know any better, but her business model is more or less the same shit as microtransactions on videogames, or the streamers wielding command over a legion of 13 year old's parent's credit cards.
There's always pricks ready to defend what is basically a scam and a con job, because "hurr well nobody's making you buy it", but that's just missing the point. It's hard to feel sorry for the whales who can afford to set their money on fire, but for every one who can afford it, there's some poor bastard in his mum's spare bedroom spending the last of his dole money on a Belle Delphine selfie because he's cripplingly lonely and it's the nearest he'll ever get to a shag. It's that whole parasocial relationship thing. This shit is not just porn, it's not EVEN porn. That's the part you should find worrying.
I know this place has turned into neoliberal ghouls over the last few years, but in a better kind of society, nobody would be commodifying the very concept of human intimacy this way. Nobody would be getting rich this way and nobody would be trying.
|>>|| No. 41661
Are they though? She's a meme. The number of people who sub to her thinking they really have a relationship have to be pretty small compared to the people who just feel like they're helping perpetuate the joke/meme.
|>>|| No. 41662
Most people will be subscribed to her for the porn, at a guess. I don't think there's many people paying fifteen quid a month for a meme.
|>>|| No. 41665
Wether they think so or not, yes they are. That's what her entire brand and marketing angles hinges on, wether in a conscious or unconscious way. Same way a bloke who buys a BMW or a fancy watch is doing it because on some level, he buys into all the ideas of class and status that marketing has cleverly cultivated to go along with it, wether he thinks he is or not.
Maybe I'm reading too much into it because taking business studies alongside sociology in sixth form and then discovering psychedelics early has utterly ruined my worldview. But I don't think it's a particularly healthy or ethical business model. It just happens to be one that thrives in our completely amoral consumerist environment.
|>>|| No. 41666
I think paying to see someone's tits is very different to buying a rolex - you likely wouldn't be telling the neighbours about the former, for a start.
|>>|| No. 41667
She doesn't even get her tits out. Her onlyfans is censored, and the shots that need censoring are very few and far between. That's the whole point, that's why it's not the same as just paying your favourite porn actress for some personalised pics.
Her business isn't built on porn, it's built on the parasocial relationship lonely autistic gamer virgins will easily form with a girl like her. We're it not for that, she wouldn't be making this kind of money, she'd be an average softcore model making average softcore model money, which is to say fuck all.
|>>|| No. 41668
Both the example of consumer capitalism and of coomer capitalism you give are exploitative on some level, yes. That's inherent in the capitalism part. But buying an expensive status symbol is not having a parasocial relationship.
The point I was making is that Belle's business model is relatively harmless*.
*It turns out she sometimes sells merchandise using other people's illustrations of her without permission, which is IP theft and fairly shitty behaviour. But as she owns her likeness, they can't sell those images either so it's not particularly impactful, mostly just rude.
|>>|| No. 41669
>Her business isn't built on porn, it's built on the parasocial relationship lonely autistic gamer virgins will easily form with a girl like her.
You keep saying that but you haven't shown it to be more true than the evidence we've already seen of people into her for the meme.
|>>|| No. 41670
I wasn't saying saying it is, I was pointing out that it's marketing, like any other product.
What evidence? She had to be popular before she became bathwater meme girl, and you don't think that was a complete accident do you?
|>>|| No. 41671
Her videos are still doing sexy dances and rubbing vibrators on her (censored) fanny - it's porn, just not very good porn.
I understand anyone on onlyfans is there because of 'marketing' i.e. people know who they are and want to wank to them, but she's not selling being your waifu, she's selling titillation. She rarely even talks on video.
|>>|| No. 41673
>She had to be popular before she became bathwater meme girl
Yes, she was popular because photos of her doing the ahego face were memed.
>you don't think that was a complete accident do you?
I don't think she chose her genes or strategically figured out ahead of time that doing the ahego face would rocket her to bathwater-level stardom.
Also what >>41671 says, I'm not sure why her not getting her chabuddies or clunge out on camera makes it less porn. Some people find that sexier.
|>>|| No. 41683
You're right, but I think there's definitely merit to what otherlad is saying. Why else is she offering personalised this and personalised that. Her USP is the feeling that she's "real", unlike all those other porn models.
It's a bit like how on the surface, facebook is for posting cat memes and getting angry at your nan's bigoted politics, but the real money spinner is aactually data mining and advertising. The little personal twist is her KFC secret spices.
I mean, the lass is not thick, clearly. You shouldn't discount her as just another camgirl because that doesn't explain why she's raking in so much.
|>>|| No. 41684
The personalised stuff is by no means unique to Delphine - softcore/cosplay bints like Meg Turney and Jessica Nigiri have been offering things like signed polaroids and custom shoots for high tier contributors for nigh on a decade now.
From where I'm standing she had a reasonable but small following, and her bathwater idea was funny and memeable enough to be an unexpectedly popular idea that really put her name out there, and she seems to have effectively capitalised on that coverage.
|>>|| No. 41685
>It's a bit like how on the surface, facebook is for posting cat memes and getting angry at your nan's bigoted politics, but the real money spinner is aactually data mining and advertising.
Otherlad again, not a direct comparison obviously but yeah that's what I'm getting at, it's sort of a hidden ploy that works because customers don't at first, or don't consciously, notice it. She's far from the only one to be doing it either, of course, but it is definitely A Thing if you ask me.
I consider it unethical for similar reasons that I consider maybe 75% of consumer marketing unethical, it just winds me up that it always seems to get a free pass because being a glorified camslut is somehow seen as empowering for lasses nowadays.
|>>|| No. 41687
No such thing as ethical capitalism m8. I make my money flying plebs to benidorm on overpriced tickets and ruining the planet as we go, and I don't make nearly as much as she does. I'm doing objectively more harm than her and I get a free pass from (most of) society too, despite not being an empowered woman.
|>>|| No. 41688
Why are you saying that as if it's something resembling a counter argument? I think you're parasitic scum too ladm8.
|>>|| No. 41689
No doubt, and unless you're currently stoking the engines on the Rainbow Warrior III then I doubt your job is that ethical either, or if you don't have a job you're still in The System - but that isn't really the point - I'm trying to say that you seem to take exception to her particularly brand of capitalism being ignored, when clearly it's not really any more or less awful (or gets any more of a free pass) than anything else we do.
|>>|| No. 41690
I work in healthcare so my job actually is a fair bit more ethical than most, arguably. It does generate a horrifying amount of plastic waste, is perhaps one thing.
That's really not a point though overall is it. It's a bit like someone criticising Nestle and you saying "Well you don't seem that bothered about BP, do you?"
I'm criticising her here because it's the subject that came up, and you lot are being a big set of simps. Yes, I said it, simps!
|>>|| No. 41692
Since no one else seems willing to admit it I will.
I'd rather like to fuck Belle Delphine.
|>>|| No. 41693
>It's a bit like someone criticising Nestle and you saying "Well you don't seem that bothered about BP, do you?"
Point taken, but you were directly pointing out that she was getting a free pass, while my opinion is that nearly everyone is getting a free pass.
Because I make loads of money and the airline I work for is not going anywhere.
|>>|| No. 41694
Oh yeah I'd fuck her for sure, she's very attractive.
Even if she wasn't, I'd still want to fuck her, just for the story.
|>>|| No. 41696
I clicked through a handful; she does an impressive job of explicitly fucking herself on camera without ever showing more than a hint of labia.
|>>|| No. 41697
I was confused by that bit too - presumably one has to pay extra to see the flaps?
|>>|| No. 41698
I don't think she shows the flaps to anyone - or maybe that's what 2115 quid gets you?
|>>|| No. 41699
I think she just never shows them. They're too humanising, it would destroy her anime-girl mystique. Other lad thinks her USP is being more "real" than other porn stars, I don't think that's true. Her USP is being more anime than human.
|>>|| No. 41700
It's the internet so I'm sure if she'd gotten out her flaps we'd know about it.
I reckon she's slowly working her way up to hardcore over the next few years to extend the duration of interest. The situation is like one of those porn games where they make $40k+ a month in patreon money so there's every incentive to never finish unlike with traditional game companies that set hard deadlines. Or how pornstars don't jump right into interracial and anal.
Not him but unsure how I feel about this. Sure everyone is more filth when it's not real life but if you want an anime character you can just look at cartoons, she's anime with a human face where people pay for the personal touch. As Gianna Michaels taught her as young lads with our trousers round our ankles: personality and spunk make a world of difference.
And to avoid the horror of what real anime people would look like:
|>>|| No. 41701
Those face softening and eye embiggening filters put her too far into the uncanny valley to wank to.
|>>|| No. 41703
Nigri will eventually get her tits out.
I see it as her nuclear option. She's certainly not in the limelight as she once was.
Trouble she has is opening Pandora's box means she can't close it again.
|>>|| No. 41744
Can you really call yourself a "thinking man" if you watch the news on CBBC?
|>>|| No. 41745
How else would you know wot the yoof are thinking? By hanging around them like Adam Buxton?
|>>|| No. 41771
That's not fair, I'm way more in love with her that you are. I even learnt how to spell her name and everything.
|>>|| No. 41772
Your claim is illegitimate, as I found/poster her here first.
Anyway, I don't believe I'm exaggerating when I say she has the most beautiful eyes imaginable. A withering look from her would be devastating.
|>>|| No. 41773
I've met a few blonde Irish girls with eyes like that, they can be intimidating to talk to.
|>>|| No. 42267
>That Dr Becky
I thought I was the only lad who liked her. I would love for her to show me her telescope and teach me about the stars. I find it romantic.
|>>|| No. 42269
Has she got a willy? Most of the YouTube lady nerds I fancy have got willies.
|>>|| No. 42270
There you go my friend: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHSbIfwVuec_BwUrYAqN_qw
|>>|| No. 42271
She seems a bit tomboyish too, which is also a great .gs staple.
I wouldn't care if she did, I'd give that a good going too. She's absolutely lovely.
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ First 100 posts ] [ Last 50 posts ]