|>>|| No. 41173
>"Zealot" implies a faith aspect in Thunberg's climate rhetoric which isn't the case, it's all real.
People have faith in things that are real all the time, you ask the average person on the street how they know a bunch of things are 'real' that are actually 'real' they won't have a fucking clue they will stare at you blankly.
You ask them "what the most abundant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere is?" and a tiny fraction would say water, I am willing to bet that you didn't even know water was a greenhouse gas until I just said it, and you won't accept it as a fact coming from me because you decided I am on the wrong side of your faith.
Because it doesn't really matter a lot of time if people know why they should believe something as long as they believe the correct thing.
Most people operate off of faith for most things, and argue based on faith even when those things are real.
>because she has "FAS"
I think they both have FAS that is why I made the observation
>Who said she was an ideal champion? She's just doing her thing
Appearing in the papers regularly is more than just her thing. She has a full cult of personality now.
>at your response to this is to post images of the oil-company sponsored
I didn't do that at all you projecting cretin. I think they are both fucking clowns and having let one clown in means another clown is allowed to come in and the whole thing is being allowed to become a circus when it should be the purview of climate scientists telling us the best course of action. And you are more of a clown for not being able to comprehend that.