[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
women

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 41102)
Message
File  []
close
p077yh5g.jpg
411024110241102
>> No. 41102 Anonymous
18th May 2020
Monday 11:58 pm
41102 spacer
The thinking man's crumpet.
Expand all images.
>> No. 41103 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 12:13 am
41103 spacer

nina_ramirez.jpg
411034110341103
Nowt wrong with Worsley, but Ramirez is the true queen of accessible BBC Four documentaries.
>> No. 41104 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 12:18 am
41104 spacer

dr-suzannah-lipscomb.jpg
411044110441104
>>41103
No.
>> No. 41105 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 12:28 am
41105 spacer
>>41104

Let's be realistic here, which of the three looks like they'd be properly dirty? Lipscomb would be a dead fish, Worsley would be a good laugh in bed, but Ramirez is quite obviously into some properly nasty stuff. I don't reckon that Ruth Goodman is particularly mucky, but she'd be game for anything if you returned the favour. Still not made up my mind about Kate Williams, but she does have red hair in her favour and she's posh enough to have some weird repressed stuff going on.
>> No. 41106 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 1:08 am
41106 spacer

Bettany Hughes.jpg
411064110641106
I've been waiting nearly 20 years for Bettany Hughes to whisk me away on a grand tour of the classical Greek history. Which is, of course, nothing but an excuse to molest me over the summer holidays in a very classical Greek fashion. I'm beginning to think that it's not going to happen.

The last time we had this thread I spilt coffee all over my laptop which not only finally ruined it right before Christmas 2016 but also lost me 2 months of work on my thesis. Thank you for reading my blog.
>> No. 41108 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 7:43 am
41108 spacer

Ellie_np_large.jpg
411084110841108
Does Ellie from Countryfile count?
>> No. 41109 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 9:28 am
41109 spacer
>>41102
Oh god she is the best.

This thread is a living advert for BBC4 - they better not shut it down.
>> No. 41110 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 9:28 am
41110 spacer

FrancescaStav.jpg
411104111041110
We'd undearth the true meaning of Sodom and Gomorrah together, iykwim.
>> No. 41111 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 9:34 am
41111 spacer
>>41109
Brainy Bird Central
>> No. 41116 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 12:50 pm
41116 spacer
>>41108

Bloody countryfiles, coming over here and diddling our country. STRING 'EM UP.
>> No. 41117 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 1:10 pm
41117 spacer

Anita Rani.jpg
411174111741117
>>41108
I'd give Anita Rani a ride on my new combine harvester IYKWIM.
>> No. 41119 Anonymous
19th May 2020
Tuesday 3:32 pm
41119 spacer
>>41117
I posted a picture of Nadiya the other week, and Anita Rani upon closer consideration has opened my eyes, and other things.
>> No. 41147 Anonymous
20th May 2020
Wednesday 9:39 am
41147 spacer
>>41117
She is great - would like to go on a bracing country walk with her.
>> No. 41154 Anonymous
21st May 2020
Thursday 11:57 am
41154 spacer

Tapping-into-Greeces-heritage-withJULIABRADBURY.jpg
411544115441154
>>41147
For that you want Julia Bradbury and her RIGHT PRIME ARSE.
>> No. 41155 Anonymous
21st May 2020
Thursday 12:00 pm
41155 spacer
>>41154
My absolute favourite.
>> No. 41157 Anonymous
21st May 2020
Thursday 2:17 pm
41157 spacer
>>41156
Why are you trying to force this.
>> No. 41158 Anonymous
21st May 2020
Thursday 6:08 pm
41158 spacer
>>41157

What did I miss? I love a forced meme.
>> No. 41159 Anonymous
21st May 2020
Thursday 6:10 pm
41159 spacer
>>41158
The same underage lass that gets sporadically posted here.
>> No. 41160 Anonymous
21st May 2020
Thursday 7:18 pm
41160 spacer

ChristinaTrevanion.jpg
411604116041160
Pure filth.
>> No. 41161 Anonymous
21st May 2020
Thursday 7:23 pm
41161 spacer
>>41160

Kate Bliss is the fittest antiques bird, even if her face is a bit too wide.


>> No. 41162 Anonymous
21st May 2020
Thursday 10:09 pm
41162 spacer

natasha raskin.jpg
411624116241162
>>41161
The world of daytime antiques programming has more than its fair share of gorgeous women.
>> No. 41163 Anonymous
22nd May 2020
Friday 1:26 am
41163 spacer
>>41159

It's Naomi Seibt. She's about 25.
>> No. 41164 Anonymous
22nd May 2020
Friday 1:31 am
41164 spacer
>>41163

19, according to The Mail. She looks genetically subnormal though.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8040469/German-teenage-climate-change-denier-Naomi-Seibt-19-known-anti-Greta-speak-CPAC.html
>> No. 41165 Anonymous
22nd May 2020
Friday 1:49 am
41165 spacer
>>41163
And thick as mince to boot. Not a candidate here.
>> No. 41166 Anonymous
22nd May 2020
Friday 1:52 am
41166 spacer

800px-FASkid.gif
411664116641166
>>41164

I surely can't be the only person who feels like global environmental issues shouldn't be lead exclusively by teenage girls with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders
>> No. 41167 Anonymous
22nd May 2020
Friday 11:09 am
41167 spacer
>>41166
Why not? It's only a problem if you obsessively make it a problem.
>> No. 41168 Anonymous
22nd May 2020
Friday 12:51 pm
41168 spacer
>>41167

Because I presume there are people more qualified in every measurable sense to perform that role.

If your ideal champion for a cause is a zealot, ignorant of all possible doubts and weaknesses in their philosophy than by all means these are the correct choices.

But if you want a realistic representation of the problem, the evidence and the solutions to a problem you are far from the best choice. Make no mistake they are part of the same cultural disease that makes an obnoxious reality TV star president of the United States, one that disregards merit in favour of memes.
>> No. 41169 Anonymous
22nd May 2020
Friday 12:57 pm
41169 spacer
>>41168
I thought the problem was you don't want to fuck her because she has "FAS"? Shut the fuck up, you're talking such nonsense. "Zealot" implies a faith aspect in Thunberg's climate rhetoric which isn't the case, it's all real.

I want to press your face into an industrial sander and watch your head turn to jam, stupid sexist prick.
>> No. 41170 Anonymous
22nd May 2020
Friday 1:14 pm
41170 spacer
>>41168

Who said she was an ideal champion? She's just doing her thing. Only "ideal" in so far as she's doing good work; someone doing better would be even more ideal. We can't just switch her out for someone you find more attractive, that's not how reality works. That your response to this is to post images of the oil-company sponsored, loli looking one while spouting vague science denying statements because she makes your dick twitch is neither here nor there.
>> No. 41171 Anonymous
22nd May 2020
Friday 1:19 pm
41171 spacer
>>41169
Froth from his mouth.
Steam from his ears.
You've done it now, lad.
You've trolled him to tears.
>> No. 41173 Anonymous
22nd May 2020
Friday 6:24 pm
41173 spacer
>>41170
>"Zealot" implies a faith aspect in Thunberg's climate rhetoric which isn't the case, it's all real.

People have faith in things that are real all the time, you ask the average person on the street how they know a bunch of things are 'real' that are actually 'real' they won't have a fucking clue they will stare at you blankly.

You ask them "what the most abundant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere is?" and a tiny fraction would say water, I am willing to bet that you didn't even know water was a greenhouse gas until I just said it, and you won't accept it as a fact coming from me because you decided I am on the wrong side of your faith.

Because it doesn't really matter a lot of time if people know why they should believe something as long as they believe the correct thing.

Most people operate off of faith for most things, and argue based on faith even when those things are real.

>because she has "FAS"
I think they both have FAS that is why I made the observation

>>41170
>Who said she was an ideal champion? She's just doing her thing
Appearing in the papers regularly is more than just her thing. She has a full cult of personality now.

>at your response to this is to post images of the oil-company sponsored

I didn't do that at all you projecting cretin. I think they are both fucking clowns and having let one clown in means another clown is allowed to come in and the whole thing is being allowed to become a circus when it should be the purview of climate scientists telling us the best course of action. And you are more of a clown for not being able to comprehend that.
>> No. 41174 Anonymous
22nd May 2020
Friday 7:11 pm
41174 spacer
>>41173
You're so rational. I wish I could be one of your many mates.
>> No. 41175 Anonymous
22nd May 2020
Friday 8:11 pm
41175 spacer

VictoriaCM.jpg
411754117541175
My thoughts on this are as follows: she's a spacker who someone, likely a simp of hers, seems intent on forcing here.

You lot are way behind on this thread anyway. She's more than David can handle, surely?
>> No. 41187 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 8:52 am
41187 spacer

image-asset.jpg
411874118741187
Like Angela Rayner if she actually had a functioning brain.
>> No. 41188 Anonymous
26th May 2020
Tuesday 9:54 am
41188 spacer

helen-czerki-five-books-portrait.jpg
411884118841188
Massively underrated. It helps I've got a thing for soft Manc and South Yorks accents.
>> No. 41207 Anonymous
29th May 2020
Friday 11:51 am
41207 spacer

Sarah-Cruddas-INTV-1.jpg
412074120741207
Used to do do the weather, degree in astrophysics. I love are Sarah.
>> No. 41208 Anonymous
31st May 2020
Sunday 2:30 pm
41208 spacer

100968977_2568367870095217_6270126273285062656_o.jpg
412084120841208
>>41207
She is fit.
>> No. 41224 Anonymous
6th June 2020
Saturday 5:54 pm
41224 spacer

suz.jpg
412244122441224
Dr Suzannah Lipscomb
>> No. 41296 Anonymous
25th June 2020
Thursday 2:00 pm
41296 spacer

Kathy_Sykes_at_Cheltenham_Science_Festival_2009_cr.jpg
412964129641296
Kathy Sykes who was on that Rough Science show years ago. I'd give her rough science (biology) IYKWIM.
>> No. 41297 Anonymous
25th June 2020
Thursday 2:02 pm
41297 spacer

Phillipa_Forrester.JPG.jpg
412974129741297
Philippa used to make Robot Wars worth watching. She unfortunately looks uncomfortably like Emma Kennedy now.
>> No. 41299 Anonymous
25th June 2020
Thursday 2:21 pm
41299 spacer
>>41297
Cross her with Sarah Lancashire and you've pretty much got my mum.
>> No. 41301 Anonymous
25th June 2020
Thursday 3:23 pm
41301 spacer

sarahcruddasnorks.jpg
413014130141301
>>41208 She's got a cracking pair too.
>> No. 41302 Anonymous
25th June 2020
Thursday 3:28 pm
41302 spacer

1611924_orig.jpg
413024130241302
Emily Graslie off of Prehistoric Road Trip and also the internet.
>> No. 41303 Anonymous
25th June 2020
Thursday 5:26 pm
41303 spacer

LizBonnin.jpg
413034130341303
It's her accent too.
>> No. 41344 Anonymous
1st August 2020
Saturday 9:51 pm
41344 spacer

MadelineMiller_C6_4flat.final-001.jpg
413444134441344

>> No. 41351 Anonymous
7th August 2020
Friday 8:57 pm
41351 spacer

MarthaArgerichYoung.jpg
413514135141351
>>41344
Jesus. Such women always make me smile.

Here's legendary classical pianist Martha Argerich in the '60s.
>> No. 41352 Anonymous
8th August 2020
Saturday 11:20 pm
41352 spacer

1469102582-robot-wars-angela-scanlon.jpg
413524135241352
Back to Robot Wars.
>> No. 41353 Anonymous
9th August 2020
Sunday 1:40 pm
41353 spacer
>>41302
God, I really have a crush on this image. Every time i scroll past it i gaze for a moment.
>> No. 41354 Anonymous
9th August 2020
Sunday 1:40 pm
41354 spacer
>>41353
And now she's gone. Oh well.
>> No. 41355 Anonymous
9th August 2020
Sunday 1:57 pm
41355 spacer

SABRINA PASTERSKI.jpg
413554135541355
I'd give her some high-energy particle physics IYKWIM

>>41351
I wish the world had more brunettes that are slightly on the spectrum.
>> No. 41356 Anonymous
9th August 2020
Sunday 2:52 pm
41356 spacer


Phwoar I'd give her a big problem with my straight edge IYKWIM.
>> No. 41357 Anonymous
9th August 2020
Sunday 5:18 pm
41357 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2c0P2CEU9A
>> No. 41358 Anonymous
14th August 2020
Friday 9:25 am
41358 spacer

SusieDent.jpg
413584135841358

>> No. 41359 Anonymous
14th August 2020
Friday 10:28 am
41359 spacer
>>41358
Phwoar I'd check her definitions IYKWIM.
>> No. 41456 Anonymous
30th September 2020
Wednesday 10:15 am
41456 spacer

SusannaReid.jpg
414564145641456
She could honestly crossover to the fitter now she's older thread. The lovely Susanna's 49.
>> No. 41457 Anonymous
30th September 2020
Wednesday 12:22 pm
41457 spacer
>>41456
I'd have said she was too much of a bimbo for this thread.
>> No. 41458 Anonymous
30th September 2020
Wednesday 12:57 pm
41458 spacer
>>41457
I was going to say the same thing, so I'm glad you did.

She is very attractive, but I'm afraid a bit thick.
>> No. 41475 Anonymous
4th October 2020
Sunday 7:35 pm
41475 spacer

LindsayEllis.png
414754147541475

>> No. 41477 Anonymous
4th October 2020
Sunday 8:04 pm
41477 spacer
>>41475

She reminds me an awful lot of my first proper girlfriend from Year 10. Definitely would.

She is a lezzer though, and I have forseen a future wherein she's at the centre of a Twitter scandal for being an accused TERF.
>> No. 41478 Anonymous
4th October 2020
Sunday 8:22 pm
41478 spacer

Screenshot_2020-10-04 Justice (Part 1) ContraPoint.png
414784147841478
>>41477
What are you talking about? She's married to a man and one of her best mates is ContraPoints.

Also adding ContraPoints to the thread. Specifically goth Contra.
>> No. 41480 Anonymous
4th October 2020
Sunday 8:29 pm
41480 spacer

Alice-Roberts-14.jpg
414804148041480
I'd very much like to go on an extended travelling holiday with Dr Alice Roberts where we can discuss the wonders of human anatomy. Something that involves overnight trains and hiking.

>>41475
If she's so clever than how come she's dressing like a sultry schoolteacher for patreon money?
>> No. 41482 Anonymous
4th October 2020
Sunday 8:33 pm
41482 spacer
>>41478

I'm sure one of her videos had her partner in and it was this little tubby weeaboo girl. Maybe I'm getting mixed up. I also have no idea what exactly Contrapoints is because I've never watched it.

But I can still see Ellis getting un-personed one day, because she has actual principles and values based on her own knowledge and independent thought, as opposed to just following the will of the hivemind. Such is the way with many of these "Breadtube" types.
>> No. 41483 Anonymous
4th October 2020
Sunday 8:43 pm
41483 spacer
>>41480
She doesn't I just cherry picked some frames from a video of hers where you can see her clevage because I'm a massive sad act.

>>41482
I think you're being a bit bonkers, honestly.
>> No. 41487 Anonymous
6th October 2020
Tuesday 5:58 am
41487 spacer
As a working class bloke who accidentally became financially aligned with the middle classes, youtube videos involving posh women talking about their aga lifestyle are more potent stimulation than any hardcore pornography ever could be. I can only assume to her, watching someone like myself mixing concrete or digging a ditch would be similarly exciting.


>> No. 41488 Anonymous
6th October 2020
Tuesday 10:10 am
41488 spacer
>>41487

Oh christ. That accent. She's wearing pearl earrings and an alice band. I want to sniff her farts.
>> No. 41489 Anonymous
6th October 2020
Tuesday 1:47 pm
41489 spacer
>>41488

She has that look in her eye that makes me want to get a job as her rough hewn northern gardener boy, despite being a man in his 30s with a skin care routine and probably a similar income as her husband.

But I can still crank up the geordie accent, it'll be reet. She has a video on how to tie a Stock properly for when you're following the hounds side saddle. I don't even fucking know what that means, but it's turning me on.
>> No. 41490 Anonymous
6th October 2020
Tuesday 7:29 pm
41490 spacer
>>41487
My God, it's like an issue of Country Life has assumed human form.
>> No. 41491 Anonymous
6th October 2020
Tuesday 8:47 pm
41491 spacer
>>41489

Watching that video gives me a throbbing hard-on some insight into empire - I'd do whatever she told me to do, just because she seems like she should be in charge especially if she tells me to lick her spicy arsehole.


>> No. 41492 Anonymous
6th October 2020
Tuesday 8:52 pm
41492 spacer
You lot have gone wrong.
>> No. 41493 Anonymous
6th October 2020
Tuesday 11:37 pm
41493 spacer
>>41491

I want her to dress me up as a fox and tell me she's going to hang my pelt on the wall after killing me for sport IYKWIM
>> No. 41494 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 5:30 am
41494 spacer
>>41491
Why is she making these videos? Who are her audience on YouTube?
>> No. 41495 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 5:59 am
41495 spacer
>>41494

She's a kept woman who needs a hobby. I'm not complaining.
>> No. 41496 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 5:59 am
41496 spacer
>>41492

We were born wrong, that's why we're here.
>> No. 41497 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 7:21 am
41497 spacer
>>41494

I've only briefly investigated between raging powerful wanks but it seems her audience is about 5% likeminded british poshos and 95% septics who think everyone in Britain lives like that.
>> No. 41498 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 10:42 am
41498 spacer
I dunno why, but this posh bird chat has reminded me of Mistress Evilyne. Don't Google her, you'll regret it.
>> No. 41499 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 11:14 am
41499 spacer

mistress.png
414994149941499
>>41498
>Don't Google her, you'll regret it.
Meh.
>> No. 41500 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 11:17 am
41500 spacer
>>41499
>Hardsports
This and watersports, why do they call them sports? They don't involve arguing over whether trans people should be allowed to take part.
>> No. 41501 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 11:46 am
41501 spacer
>>41500

It's a pre-internet thing, from the days of contact magazines and classified adverts in the local paper. The jargon of punting ("O-levels, A-levels, OWO, CIM") offered a level of semi-plausible deniability about what was being offered.
>> No. 41502 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 11:54 am
41502 spacer
>>41499
What's the appeal of eating shit? It doesn't taste nice.
>> No. 41503 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 12:06 pm
41503 spacer
>>41502
The more aroused you are, the less your disgust-response kicks in and to some degree it's replaced by a thrill; same reason you get off on putting your mouth on the place your partners piss out of and feel ashamed of yourself when you go to close the tabs of your porn. Only in some people, it goes into overdrive. There's probably some sort of related sexual-development trigger in some cases too, same reason anything gets fetishised but in those instances is related to shitting.

>>41501

Thanks.
>> No. 41504 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 1:57 pm
41504 spacer
Honestly, I think I'd rather eat shit than get into the "findom" stuff that seems popular in the dominatrix scene these days. I don't really understand either, but I can think of nothing less sexy than sending a lass £200 on paypal and her taking the piss out of me for it. I'd probably pay decent money for a femdom session with a posho bird if I wasn't able to find such antics elsewhere, but just sitting at home filling out account details on Halifax seems like the least erotic thing I can imagine.

Maybe it's a class thing. I don't have money to burn, I earned this stuff.
>> No. 41505 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 2:17 pm
41505 spacer
>>41499
What's ball busting? Is it giving someone a case of serious blue balls or is it actually attacking someone's balls? I really wouldn't enjoy having my balls attacked.
>> No. 41506 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 2:21 pm
41506 spacer

ac74388e3acb0b0c43381aae53db18b1.15.jpg
415064150641506
>>41505
>> No. 41507 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 2:23 pm
41507 spacer
>>41506
BUT WHY?
>> No. 41508 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 2:39 pm
41508 spacer
>>41504
>Findom
>Findom is an abbreviated form of the term Financial Domination.
How is this even a thing?
>> No. 41509 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 2:43 pm
41509 spacer
>>41508
You're surprised by the lengths people will go to to get off?
>> No. 41511 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 3:32 pm
41511 spacer
>>41508
I find findom to be the weirdest of all the recent kinks I've heard about - look on Twitter and see how many people are apparently doing it. I've rationalised it that if you're so sad that you never get any attention from women at all, paying for them to take the piss out of you for sending them money is at least something. I guess a few of the findoms actually send nudes, maybe? I don't get it.
>> No. 41512 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 3:37 pm
41512 spacer
>>41511
Went to uni recently with a girl that did some findom stuff on the side and had a few "pay pigs" at her mercy. She essentially described it as having a sugar daddy with extra steps.
>> No. 41514 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 4:04 pm
41514 spacer
>>41511

From what I've seen, they seem to get off on being so pathetic that they are able to be coerced into sending women a load of money for basically nothing. Often, part of the shtick is that it's a lot of money - enough money to actually have a financial impact on the bloke (whether or not that part is just fantasy, I'm not sure, but I have seen references to making them bankrupt etc).

I understand the scene, in general. I liked it a lot when my ex would spit in my mouth and call me a slut, I understand why humiliation and power exchange is sexy. But paying bills is not sexy and never will be. Maybe I just grew up with too much financial anxiety to ever find it appealing, I don't think anything could make me softer than wondering if this bint in latex was going to make me accrue unarranged overdraft charges.

On the other hand, I sort of do see the opposite sort of power play being quite stimulating - chucking a few hundred quid at a 20 year old student lass like it's nothing would at the very least make me feel like a flash git. But then I sort of assume the sugar daddy craic is that you do actually get to shag the lass, at the very least?

That's why I wouldn't ever pay for a dominatrix, despite the fact I'd probably fucking definitely enjoy it, for the same reason I don't go to strip clubs - I don't see the appeal in paying all that money and then still having to go home for a wank.
>> No. 41516 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 4:30 pm
41516 spacer
>>41511

It's basically a scam really. It's just a scam where the victims are given the illusion, or deceive themselves even, of thinking they're getting something out of it. You see a few absolutely hollow and blatant examples where they outright state you'll be all but ignored and just send them money. But that's just EXTRA cruel domination, right?

Well, no, no it isn't love. The power is firmly in the hands of the bloke paying you- He's just a particularly tragic idiot. I don't know if it annoys me more that there are blokes out there both pathetic and wealthy enough to fall for it, or the fact so many people will defend it in the same manner as Bathwater Gamer Girl.
>> No. 41517 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 4:35 pm
41517 spacer

boot.jpg
415174151741517
>>41516

Actually, this image basically sums up my thoughts on the subject better than I could in text.

The kid is the paypig and the boot is the findomme, but as you can see, he is holding it against his own head
>> No. 41522 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 5:44 pm
41522 spacer
>>41511
>>41514
>>41516
I'm sorry, but that is just pathetic. There's something wrong with them. It is much worse than the bathwater girl, and I thought THAT was highest level of pathetic.
>> No. 41523 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 7:07 pm
41523 spacer

bathwatergirl.png
415234152341523
>>41522
>the bathwater girl

Oh my fucking christ, I didn't even know about this.
>> No. 41524 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 7:10 pm
41524 spacer
>>41522
Presumably they're fine with it as these women are approached by these men in the first place with the express intention of becoming "paypigs".

I tend to keep my nose out of other people's wank fantasies; something of a general rule for life.
>> No. 41525 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 7:26 pm
41525 spacer
>>41516
>It's just a scam where the victims are given the illusion, or deceive themselves even, of thinking they're getting something out of it.
If they think they're getting something out of it but that something is psychological anyway, then they are getting something out of it. It's essentially psychosomatic.
>> No. 41526 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 7:52 pm
41526 spacer

Loser battles.jpg
415264152641526
>>41514
>I don't think anything could make me softer than wondering if this bint in latex was going to make me accrue unarranged overdraft charges.
Maybe the extended payoff plays into it. Like the shame thing when you close those tabs of porn, except it's further down the line and makes the interaction less temporary and forgetable.
>> No. 41527 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 9:12 pm
41527 spacer
>>41525

That's pretty much my point, hence the image I posted after that. It's all self-actualised. If they get off over throwing their money away for nothing, they could instead donate it to a homeless charity and have a wank over it.

Or I could just mug them, I bet that would be the ultimate turn on. I'm such a cruel evil findomme that I'm not even a fit bird, I'm a beardy 30-something bloke with a hairy arse crack. You naughty boy, letting me hit you in the face and nick your debit card like that.

[spoiler]Okay full disclosure when I was unemployed in my early 20s I operated a fake Fetlife "findomme" account to get strangers to buy me shit on an Amazon wishlist. Some of it was make-up, hair straighteners, etc which I'd just stick on eBay, but I also scored a laptop and a couple of phones. I just asked my girlfriend (at the time) to pose whenever they insisted on pictures, and obviously none of them were ever nudes. These men are just suckers asking to be ripped off and that's why I can't respect them honestly.[/spoilers]
>> No. 41528 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 9:12 pm
41528 spacer
>>41527

Bastard, I fucked the spoiler tag up good and proper.
>> No. 41529 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 9:16 pm
41529 spacer
>>41527
>If they get off over throwing their money away for nothing, they could instead donate it to a homeless charity and have a wank over it.
But they don't, they're paying to have a fantasy fulfilled and, so long as they can believe it, or at least suspend disbelief, that fantasy is being fulfilled. You didn't scam those men, you got them off.
>> No. 41530 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 9:18 pm
41530 spacer
>>41528
Seems appropriate somehow.

>>41527
I always suspected this was the case - I'm quite sure that many of the most successful onlyfans accounts are double-acts in the same way.
>> No. 41531 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 10:25 pm
41531 spacer
>>41529

I mean sure, that's why it worked isn't it?

The thing is I suspect many, if not all, of them would quite strongly disagree if the thought had actually occurred to them that they might not be talking to the hot young thing they thought they were.
>> No. 41532 Anonymous
7th October 2020
Wednesday 10:45 pm
41532 spacer
>>41531
Maybe they are mostly stupid boomers who would use an excel spreadsheet as a national database.
>> No. 41602 Anonymous
20th October 2020
Tuesday 9:57 am
41602 spacer

207856886.jpg
416024160241602
I'm not sure if she counts, but she should.
>> No. 41603 Anonymous
20th October 2020
Tuesday 10:29 am
41603 spacer

5104512-6282451-image-m-82_1539719678445.jpg
416034160341603
>>41602

Her mam was fitter.
>> No. 41604 Anonymous
20th October 2020
Tuesday 10:41 am
41604 spacer

00F9B12C00000191-0-image-a-93_1528297840228.jpg
416044160441604
>>41603
For me Blue Peter peaked with Katy Hill.
>> No. 41605 Anonymous
20th October 2020
Tuesday 10:44 am
41605 spacer
>>41604
Her peaked hills made my peter blue IYKWIM
>> No. 41606 Anonymous
20th October 2020
Tuesday 5:31 pm
41606 spacer

Konniehuq.jpg
416064160641606
>>41604
>For me Blue Peter peaked with Katy Hill.

I don't know how you think it is acceptable to come into /x/ and say this kind of thing.

I don't walk into your church and start proselytizing how Jesus probably isn't the son of god and judaism is the only true abrahamic do I?

And don't act like you didn't know, her face is on the door.
>> No. 41607 Anonymous
20th October 2020
Tuesday 5:40 pm
41607 spacer
>>41606
We don't post The Huq any more out of respect for ARE Charlie.
>> No. 41608 Anonymous
20th October 2020
Tuesday 5:41 pm
41608 spacer
>>41606
How I long to Fuq Huq.
>> No. 41609 Anonymous
20th October 2020
Tuesday 6:29 pm
41609 spacer
>>41608
The q is silent so that just sounds weird.
>> No. 41610 Anonymous
20th October 2020
Tuesday 8:10 pm
41610 spacer
>>41606

I've got to be honest - in a game of shag/marry/kill, I'm marrying Huq and shagging Hill. Kill Leslie, obviously.
>> No. 41611 Anonymous
21st October 2020
Wednesday 2:54 am
41611 spacer
>>41610
John really can't catch a break.
>> No. 41612 Anonymous
21st October 2020
Wednesday 2:03 pm
41612 spacer

0_Ulrika-Jonsson.jpg
416124161241612
>>41611
On the day he was found not guilt of groping Ulrika posted a naked selfie with a captain about reclaiming her body. He can't catch a break.
>> No. 41613 Anonymous
21st October 2020
Wednesday 2:15 pm
41613 spacer
>>41612

That woman needs a big plate of chips.
>> No. 41614 Anonymous
21st October 2020
Wednesday 10:37 pm
41614 spacer
>>41610
I only remember Connie, Matt, and the short-haired lassie. Matt seems like a lovely bloke so I'd marry him, I think I'd actually go for the short-haired lassie, I can't remember her name so she seems more mysterious and interesting than Connie who imo is overrated.
>> No. 41615 Anonymous
22nd October 2020
Thursday 2:54 pm
41615 spacer

the-one-show-matt-baker-blue-peter-reunion-t.jpg
416154161541615
>>41614
Liz. Not my cup of tea.
>> No. 41618 Anonymous
25th October 2020
Sunday 10:27 pm
41618 spacer

j.jpg
416184161841618

>> No. 41621 Anonymous
26th October 2020
Monday 5:40 pm
41621 spacer
>>41523

I don't understand the pricing on the last one.

Obviously she's decided it takes 2.5k to shag her, but why that specific amount? Doesn't make sense even with VAT.

>>41175

Eugh. So witty ,so impassioned, so much fun, looks fantastic. ; _ ;
>> No. 41622 Anonymous
26th October 2020
Monday 7:43 pm
41622 spacer
>>41621
>Obviously she's decided it takes 2.5k to shag her, but why that specific amount? Doesn't make sense even with VAT.

How would you propose deciding how much someone else should pay to shag you?
>> No. 41623 Anonymous
26th October 2020
Monday 7:51 pm
41623 spacer
>>41622

Market rate of competitors, supply and demand and disposable income of potential buyers, one would presume.

Knobbing Belle, is a premium inelastic product so I would say this price is quite reasonable with consideration of those forces.
>> No. 41624 Anonymous
26th October 2020
Monday 8:23 pm
41624 spacer
https://youtu.be/Fe4O5WqC-6E
>> No. 41625 Anonymous
26th October 2020
Monday 9:16 pm
41625 spacer
>>41624
That is very enjoyable and fascinating. As he says, we all need the OnlyFans money.
>> No. 41627 Anonymous
29th October 2020
Thursday 1:46 pm
41627 spacer
>>41622

I just mean the figure, it's £2,115.50. That's...odd. Comes to £2,538.60.

I just find that very strange. Doesn't appear to be a meme number or reference.
>> No. 41628 Anonymous
29th October 2020
Thursday 1:52 pm
41628 spacer
>>41627
The site takes a cut of 20% if that helps explain it. I'm not going to do any maths but I don't think it does.
>> No. 41629 Anonymous
30th October 2020
Friday 5:55 pm
41629 spacer
>>41628

Agreed. I've fucked around on uktaxcalculators and I can't make it round up to anything or be a particularly remarkable figure.

The reason why I'm out on this particular opportunity is because you pay first and negotiate later; I want the fixed price option with the 100% "treat her like a human fleshlight for 24hrs" guarantee.
>> No. 41630 Anonymous
30th October 2020
Friday 6:01 pm
41630 spacer
>>41629

I've emailed her enquiries address to ask.
>> No. 41631 Anonymous
30th October 2020
Friday 6:10 pm
41631 spacer
Why are you mongs so hung up on what is pretty obviously just a randomly chosen figure?
>> No. 41632 Anonymous
30th October 2020
Friday 6:10 pm
41632 spacer
>>41630
We need to have a whip-round/gofundme and one of us needs to take one for the team.
>> No. 41633 Anonymous
30th October 2020
Friday 6:16 pm
41633 spacer

Capture.png
416334163341633
>>41631
I don't even understand how he saw those numbers.

>>41628
I checked the support pages and the fees aren't that high (and the percentages are in addition to a flat fee).
>> No. 41634 Anonymous
30th October 2020
Friday 7:07 pm
41634 spacer
>>41633
>I don't even understand how he saw those numbers.
Well that's the answer right there, isn't it? $2,500 vs £2115.50. The exchange rate plus VAT.
>> No. 41635 Anonymous
30th October 2020
Friday 7:18 pm
41635 spacer
This is like the bicycle scene in A Scanner Darkly.
>> No. 41636 Anonymous
30th October 2020
Friday 7:20 pm
41636 spacer

index.jpg
416364163641636
>>41634

None of us were thinking in those damnable dollars! Next time Gadget, next time!
>> No. 41638 Anonymous
30th October 2020
Friday 7:25 pm
41638 spacer
>>41635
I'll take that as a compliment, it's a more interesting sort of banter than most people's.
>> No. 41640 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 1:06 am
41640 spacer
>>41632

I was thinking about it. I wanted to shag the resident .gs prozzie to post a review but forgot about it.

Like otherlad says, I don't like that it's not expressly stated. I really can't be arsed to be negotiating sex with a woman I just gave two grand. I don't want to recreate my previous relationship.
>> No. 41641 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 1:35 am
41641 spacer
>>41640

Between her various ventures, she's pocketing the best part of a million quid a month and she hasn't even got her growler out. There's no way on god's green earth that she'll bang you for a paltry two grand.
>> No. 41644 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 1:46 am
41644 spacer
>>41641

I dunno, I'm quite handsome.
>> No. 41645 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 3:14 am
41645 spacer

VictoriaPendleton.jpg
416454164541645

>> No. 41647 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 3:31 am
41647 spacer
>>41645

Barely recognised her. Fantastic, though.

Don't know if I could bring myself to shag someone with a Halfords product range, though. I had to turn down Boardman for the same reason.
>> No. 41648 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 3:43 am
41648 spacer

pendleton-bikes-1020x748.jpg
416484164841648
>>41647
100% agree with you on the Halfords connection. But there is something going on there that is a bit MILF-y that I can't quite describe, but which I like very much.
>> No. 41649 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 8:30 am
41649 spacer
>>41641
>>41644
She took less than a minute to personally reply to my email about the weird price; not like a "real" celebrity where it's literally impossible to start a one-on-one conversation with them. I reckon if you're thoroughly motivated and a good talker you could be in there with a shot.
>> No. 41650 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 8:35 am
41650 spacer
>>41649

Do you honestly believe that she reads her own e-mails?
>> No. 41651 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 8:39 am
41651 spacer
>>41650

The reply was convincingly vapid.
>> No. 41652 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 8:43 am
41652 spacer
And yes. Why would she pass off the social-interaction stuff to someone else when that's what's making her money in the first place: her skill at it? Just because someone's making a million quid a month doesn't mean they're going to start creating jobs needlessly.
>> No. 41653 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 9:28 am
41653 spacer

Cr3VS-sW8AA-y3_.jpg
416534165341653
>>41652
Zoella got in a spot of bother earlier this year because it emerged that she'd put the lackey she employs to do exactly this sort of thing for her on furlough despite continuing to vlog and win lucrative advertising deals.

Posting this picture of the PA because it looks a bit like a bukkake shot.
>> No. 41654 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 9:48 am
41654 spacer
>>41653
The "popular" non-lewd vloggers depend on product placement and advertising though, and that in turn depends on dealing with a lot of marketing and PR types, so not surprised at all if Zoella had someone like that.

I'm with >>41652 - not surprised if Belle Delphine does it herself, the product is her interactions with others.
>> No. 41655 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 11:55 am
41655 spacer
>>41650

From what I've seen of her "content" she does very much seem like a one woman band, which to be fair, does make her continued success all the more impressive, I suppose, though I do doubt her longevity, she doesn't seem to be that creative in the actual videos she's selling (which are also leaked all over the place, so she's not bothering to file takedowns either).

Obviously, you do not at all need to have longevity if you make 12 million in your first year of operation, so I'm sure once she retires she and I will settle down on a private island shaped like an anime character or whatever she's into.
>> No. 41656 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 12:03 pm
41656 spacer
>>41655
>she doesn't seem to be that creative in the actual videos she's selling
She must be taking hundreds of "unique polaroids" every day, not much energy left there to be creative in other ways. There are only so many poses you can do.
>> No. 41657 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 12:15 pm
41657 spacer
>>41656
>not much energy left there to be creative in other way

I don't think the e-girl genre is that creative per se, it's entirely derivative of other forms, rather than unique in any way. She is doing fantastically well out of it, so I'm not surprised she has a bit of a production-line - the clever part is the simple personalisation of each picture/message to each person buying it, but that isn't difficult or time-consuming. She knows her market very well.
>> No. 41658 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 12:20 pm
41658 spacer
>>41657

I still don't really know what an E-girl is, but as a cam model she's pretty poor. But then again I'm absolutely not her market, so I'm not really trying to critique her or detract from her success.
>> No. 41659 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 12:21 pm
41659 spacer
>>41657

I think there's a lot of luck that went into her blowing up in the first place but I don't begrudge her any of it; as far as exploitative capitalism goes she's not charging anyone for anything they couldn't live without and the amount of waste it results in (an insignificant amount of water, a few jars, some recyclable photographs and envelopes) is nothing compared to pretty much any other business with comparable revenue. There's a little merch but it's not as though her income relies on the plastic generated by hundreds of thousands of funko pops.
>> No. 41660 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 3:10 pm
41660 spacer
The thing is it's not her being exploited, it's her customers. Our modern generation hasn't known anything else so they don't know any better, but her business model is more or less the same shit as microtransactions on videogames, or the streamers wielding command over a legion of 13 year old's parent's credit cards.

There's always pricks ready to defend what is basically a scam and a con job, because "hurr well nobody's making you buy it", but that's just missing the point. It's hard to feel sorry for the whales who can afford to set their money on fire, but for every one who can afford it, there's some poor bastard in his mum's spare bedroom spending the last of his dole money on a Belle Delphine selfie because he's cripplingly lonely and it's the nearest he'll ever get to a shag. It's that whole parasocial relationship thing. This shit is not just porn, it's not EVEN porn. That's the part you should find worrying.

I know this place has turned into neoliberal ghouls over the last few years, but in a better kind of society, nobody would be commodifying the very concept of human intimacy this way. Nobody would be getting rich this way and nobody would be trying.
>> No. 41661 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 3:30 pm
41661 spacer
>>41660
Are they though? She's a meme. The number of people who sub to her thinking they really have a relationship have to be pretty small compared to the people who just feel like they're helping perpetuate the joke/meme.
>> No. 41662 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 3:36 pm
41662 spacer
>>41661

Most people will be subscribed to her for the porn, at a guess. I don't think there's many people paying fifteen quid a month for a meme.
>> No. 41663 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 3:38 pm
41663 spacer
>>41662
That's not an exploitative parasocial relationship either.
>> No. 41664 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 3:48 pm
41664 spacer
>>41663

Agreed. I am not the same person.
>> No. 41665 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 3:53 pm
41665 spacer
>>41661

Wether they think so or not, yes they are. That's what her entire brand and marketing angles hinges on, wether in a conscious or unconscious way. Same way a bloke who buys a BMW or a fancy watch is doing it because on some level, he buys into all the ideas of class and status that marketing has cleverly cultivated to go along with it, wether he thinks he is or not.

Maybe I'm reading too much into it because taking business studies alongside sociology in sixth form and then discovering psychedelics early has utterly ruined my worldview. But I don't think it's a particularly healthy or ethical business model. It just happens to be one that thrives in our completely amoral consumerist environment.
>> No. 41666 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 3:57 pm
41666 spacer
>>41665

I think paying to see someone's tits is very different to buying a rolex - you likely wouldn't be telling the neighbours about the former, for a start.
>> No. 41667 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 4:23 pm
41667 spacer
>>41666

She doesn't even get her tits out. Her onlyfans is censored, and the shots that need censoring are very few and far between. That's the whole point, that's why it's not the same as just paying your favourite porn actress for some personalised pics.

Her business isn't built on porn, it's built on the parasocial relationship lonely autistic gamer virgins will easily form with a girl like her. We're it not for that, she wouldn't be making this kind of money, she'd be an average softcore model making average softcore model money, which is to say fuck all.
>> No. 41668 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 4:25 pm
41668 spacer
>>41665

Both the example of consumer capitalism and of coomer capitalism you give are exploitative on some level, yes. That's inherent in the capitalism part. But buying an expensive status symbol is not having a parasocial relationship.

The point I was making is that Belle's business model is relatively harmless*.


*It turns out she sometimes sells merchandise using other people's illustrations of her without permission, which is IP theft and fairly shitty behaviour. But as she owns her likeness, they can't sell those images either so it's not particularly impactful, mostly just rude.
>> No. 41669 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 4:28 pm
41669 spacer
>>41667
>Her business isn't built on porn, it's built on the parasocial relationship lonely autistic gamer virgins will easily form with a girl like her.
You keep saying that but you haven't shown it to be more true than the evidence we've already seen of people into her for the meme.
>> No. 41670 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 5:14 pm
41670 spacer
>>41668

I wasn't saying saying it is, I was pointing out that it's marketing, like any other product.

>>41669

What evidence? She had to be popular before she became bathwater meme girl, and you don't think that was a complete accident do you?
>> No. 41671 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 5:31 pm
41671 spacer
>>41667

Her videos are still doing sexy dances and rubbing vibrators on her (censored) fanny - it's porn, just not very good porn.

I understand anyone on onlyfans is there because of 'marketing' i.e. people know who they are and want to wank to them, but she's not selling being your waifu, she's selling titillation. She rarely even talks on video.
>> No. 41673 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 5:44 pm
41673 spacer
>>41670
>She had to be popular before she became bathwater meme girl
Yes, she was popular because photos of her doing the ahego face were memed.
>you don't think that was a complete accident do you?
I don't think she chose her genes or strategically figured out ahead of time that doing the ahego face would rocket her to bathwater-level stardom.
Also what >>41671 says, I'm not sure why her not getting her chabuddies or clunge out on camera makes it less porn. Some people find that sexier.
>> No. 41676 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 10:33 pm
41676 spacer

Belle Vorderman.jpg
416764167641676

>> No. 41679 Anonymous
31st October 2020
Saturday 11:39 pm
41679 spacer
Proper bint, she gets what she wants.
>> No. 41683 Anonymous
1st November 2020
Sunday 2:32 pm
41683 spacer
>>41671
>>41673

You're right, but I think there's definitely merit to what otherlad is saying. Why else is she offering personalised this and personalised that. Her USP is the feeling that she's "real", unlike all those other porn models.

It's a bit like how on the surface, facebook is for posting cat memes and getting angry at your nan's bigoted politics, but the real money spinner is aactually data mining and advertising. The little personal twist is her KFC secret spices.

I mean, the lass is not thick, clearly. You shouldn't discount her as just another camgirl because that doesn't explain why she's raking in so much.
>> No. 41684 Anonymous
1st November 2020
Sunday 2:42 pm
41684 spacer
>>41683

The personalised stuff is by no means unique to Delphine - softcore/cosplay bints like Meg Turney and Jessica Nigiri have been offering things like signed polaroids and custom shoots for high tier contributors for nigh on a decade now.

From where I'm standing she had a reasonable but small following, and her bathwater idea was funny and memeable enough to be an unexpectedly popular idea that really put her name out there, and she seems to have effectively capitalised on that coverage.
>> No. 41685 Anonymous
1st November 2020
Sunday 9:14 pm
41685 spacer
>>41683

>It's a bit like how on the surface, facebook is for posting cat memes and getting angry at your nan's bigoted politics, but the real money spinner is aactually data mining and advertising.

Otherlad again, not a direct comparison obviously but yeah that's what I'm getting at, it's sort of a hidden ploy that works because customers don't at first, or don't consciously, notice it. She's far from the only one to be doing it either, of course, but it is definitely A Thing if you ask me.

I consider it unethical for similar reasons that I consider maybe 75% of consumer marketing unethical, it just winds me up that it always seems to get a free pass because being a glorified camslut is somehow seen as empowering for lasses nowadays.
>> No. 41687 Anonymous
1st November 2020
Sunday 9:26 pm
41687 spacer
>>41685


No such thing as ethical capitalism m8. I make my money flying plebs to benidorm on overpriced tickets and ruining the planet as we go, and I don't make nearly as much as she does. I'm doing objectively more harm than her and I get a free pass from (most of) society too, despite not being an empowered woman.
>> No. 41688 Anonymous
1st November 2020
Sunday 11:16 pm
41688 spacer
>>41687

Why are you saying that as if it's something resembling a counter argument? I think you're parasitic scum too ladm8.
>> No. 41689 Anonymous
2nd November 2020
Monday 1:56 am
41689 spacer
>>41688

No doubt, and unless you're currently stoking the engines on the Rainbow Warrior III then I doubt your job is that ethical either, or if you don't have a job you're still in The System - but that isn't really the point - I'm trying to say that you seem to take exception to her particularly brand of capitalism being ignored, when clearly it's not really any more or less awful (or gets any more of a free pass) than anything else we do.
>> No. 41690 Anonymous
2nd November 2020
Monday 7:14 am
41690 spacer
>>41689

I work in healthcare so my job actually is a fair bit more ethical than most, arguably. It does generate a horrifying amount of plastic waste, is perhaps one thing.

That's really not a point though overall is it. It's a bit like someone criticising Nestle and you saying "Well you don't seem that bothered about BP, do you?"

I'm criticising her here because it's the subject that came up, and you lot are being a big set of simps. Yes, I said it, simps!
>> No. 41691 Anonymous
2nd November 2020
Monday 8:09 am
41691 spacer
>>41687
Why not quit? The holiday business is fucked for the time being anyway.
>> No. 41692 Anonymous
2nd November 2020
Monday 10:56 am
41692 spacer
Since no one else seems willing to admit it I will.

I'd rather like to fuck Belle Delphine.
>> No. 41693 Anonymous
2nd November 2020
Monday 11:02 am
41693 spacer
>>41690

>It's a bit like someone criticising Nestle and you saying "Well you don't seem that bothered about BP, do you?"

Point taken, but you were directly pointing out that she was getting a free pass, while my opinion is that nearly everyone is getting a free pass.

>>41691

Because I make loads of money and the airline I work for is not going anywhere.
>> No. 41694 Anonymous
2nd November 2020
Monday 11:02 am
41694 spacer
>>41692

Oh yeah I'd fuck her for sure, she's very attractive.

Even if she wasn't, I'd still want to fuck her, just for the story.
>> No. 41695 Anonymous
2nd November 2020
Monday 11:25 am
41695 spacer
>>41692
Fill your boots m8. I did yesterday.
https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph5f79fc4f87ae9
https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph5f79ff2751ca3
>> No. 41696 Anonymous
2nd November 2020
Monday 1:01 pm
41696 spacer
>>41695
I clicked through a handful; she does an impressive job of explicitly fucking herself on camera without ever showing more than a hint of labia.
>> No. 41697 Anonymous
2nd November 2020
Monday 1:11 pm
41697 spacer
>>41696
I was confused by that bit too - presumably one has to pay extra to see the flaps?
>> No. 41698 Anonymous
2nd November 2020
Monday 1:17 pm
41698 spacer
>>41697

I don't think she shows the flaps to anyone - or maybe that's what 2115 quid gets you?
>> No. 41699 Anonymous
2nd November 2020
Monday 1:18 pm
41699 spacer

3DPD.jpg
416994169941699
>>41697
I think she just never shows them. They're too humanising, it would destroy her anime-girl mystique. Other lad thinks her USP is being more "real" than other porn stars, I don't think that's true. Her USP is being more anime than human.
>> No. 41700 Anonymous
2nd November 2020
Monday 1:53 pm
41700 spacer
>>41698
It's the internet so I'm sure if she'd gotten out her flaps we'd know about it.

I reckon she's slowly working her way up to hardcore over the next few years to extend the duration of interest. The situation is like one of those porn games where they make $40k+ a month in patreon money so there's every incentive to never finish unlike with traditional game companies that set hard deadlines. Or how pornstars don't jump right into interracial and anal.

>>41699
Not him but unsure how I feel about this. Sure everyone is more filth when it's not real life but if you want an anime character you can just look at cartoons, she's anime with a human face where people pay for the personal touch. As Gianna Michaels taught her as young lads with our trousers round our ankles: personality and spunk make a world of difference.

And to avoid the horror of what real anime people would look like:

>> No. 41701 Anonymous
2nd November 2020
Monday 1:59 pm
41701 spacer
>>41695
Those face softening and eye embiggening filters put her too far into the uncanny valley to wank to.
>> No. 41702 Anonymous
2nd November 2020
Monday 2:56 pm
41702 spacer
>>41699
Of course if you wanted a "real" anime girl you have Projekt Melody. https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph5eae0ce193a52 Vtubers are a weird thing where real people have avatars and stream as anime girls, just she does it on adult sites as well as Twitch.
>> No. 41703 Anonymous
3rd November 2020
Tuesday 7:50 am
41703 spacer
>>41684
Nigri will eventually get her tits out.
I see it as her nuclear option. She's certainly not in the limelight as she once was.
Trouble she has is opening Pandora's box means she can't close it again.
>> No. 41743 Anonymous
22nd November 2020
Sunday 2:17 pm
41743 spacer

EllieCrisell-400.jpg
417434174341743
That Ellie Crisell who did Newsround.
>> No. 41744 Anonymous
22nd November 2020
Sunday 2:50 pm
41744 spacer
>>41743

Can you really call yourself a "thinking man" if you watch the news on CBBC?
>> No. 41745 Anonymous
22nd November 2020
Sunday 2:55 pm
41745 spacer
>>41744

How else would you know wot the yoof are thinking? By hanging around them like Adam Buxton?
>> No. 41746 Anonymous
23rd November 2020
Monday 11:19 am
41746 spacer
>>41744
I was young and she's still fit and presumably quite clever.
>> No. 41747 Anonymous
24th November 2020
Tuesday 2:01 pm
41747 spacer
This is weird.

https://twitter.com/ellie_crisell
>> No. 41748 Anonymous
24th November 2020
Tuesday 4:41 pm
41748 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0ehzkevyPs
>> No. 41770 Anonymous
5th December 2020
Saturday 11:53 am
41770 spacer

640_Saoirse_Ronan_101_2020_11_17_12_45_07.jpg
417704177041770
I'm in love with Are Sersha, she seems completely on the ball with regards to her work.
>> No. 41771 Anonymous
5th December 2020
Saturday 12:07 pm
41771 spacer
>>41770
That's not fair, I'm way more in love with her that you are. I even learnt how to spell her name and everything.

Saoirse Ronan.
>> No. 41772 Anonymous
5th December 2020
Saturday 12:31 pm
41772 spacer
>>41771
Your claim is illegitimate, as I found/poster her here first.

Anyway, I don't believe I'm exaggerating when I say she has the most beautiful eyes imaginable. A withering look from her would be devastating.
>> No. 41773 Anonymous
5th December 2020
Saturday 12:39 pm
41773 spacer
>>41772
I've met a few blonde Irish girls with eyes like that, they can be intimidating to talk to.
>> No. 41774 Anonymous
5th December 2020
Saturday 12:42 pm
41774 spacer

30405392c99662438a8d69fefdbc8fa0-700.jpg
417744177441774
>>41773
No comment.
>> No. 41869 Anonymous
26th December 2020
Saturday 11:33 am
41869 spacer

michaela-strachan-autumnwatch-t.jpg
418694186941869
How could we have missed her?

It was a tossup between this and the still fit thread, but she deserves to be recognised for her brains.
>> No. 42005 Anonymous
25th February 2021
Thursday 2:36 pm
42005 spacer
https://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/celebrity/how-to-cope-with-being-in-love-with-lucy-worsley-20210225205643

Did one of you two write this?
>> No. 42012 Anonymous
13th March 2021
Saturday 8:16 pm
42012 spacer

0_21127474-high_res-pooch-perfect.jpg
420124201242012
I'm not sure if dog grooming counts, but she's from Harrogate and named Verity so I'll say it does.
>> No. 42232 Anonymous
30th August 2021
Monday 9:21 am
42232 spacer

DrBecky.jpg
422324223242232
That Dr Becky who pops up on the youtube every now and again.
>> No. 42233 Anonymous
1st September 2021
Wednesday 12:17 am
42233 spacer

ERIKA.jpg
422334223342233
Erika the shield maiden
>> No. 42267 Anonymous
12th September 2021
Sunday 11:01 pm
42267 spacer
>>42232
>That Dr Becky

I thought I was the only lad who liked her. I would love for her to show me her telescope and teach me about the stars. I find it romantic.
>> No. 42269 Anonymous
13th September 2021
Monday 3:46 pm
42269 spacer
>>42232

Has she got a willy? Most of the YouTube lady nerds I fancy have got willies.
>> No. 42270 Anonymous
14th September 2021
Tuesday 11:00 pm
42270 spacer
>>42269
There you go my friend: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHSbIfwVuec_BwUrYAqN_qw
>> No. 42271 Anonymous
16th September 2021
Thursday 11:45 pm
42271 spacer
>>42267
She seems a bit tomboyish too, which is also a great .gs staple.

>>42269
I wouldn't care if she did, I'd give that a good going too. She's absolutely lovely.
>> No. 42407 Anonymous
23rd September 2021
Thursday 5:41 am
42407 spacer
>>42269

If she's got a dick, she ain't a chick
>> No. 42408 Anonymous
23rd September 2021
Thursday 1:09 pm
42408 spacer
>>42407
Thanks, professor. I look forward to your next paper.
>> No. 42409 Anonymous
24th September 2021
Friday 2:30 am
42409 spacer

AREBECKS.png
424094240942409
She's read this thread and is doing this on purpose.
>> No. 42410 Anonymous
24th September 2021
Friday 6:27 am
42410 spacer
>>42409

Does she have a willy?
>> No. 42412 Anonymous
24th September 2021
Friday 8:40 am
42412 spacer
>>42409
She looks like Jessica Hynes.
>> No. 42413 Anonymous
24th September 2021
Friday 1:19 pm
42413 spacer
>>42412
Does Jessica Hynes have a willy? If not, would she like one?

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password