>>294499
A damn shame us Yanks can't get in.

>>294500
Are you the same guy who's spamming the Gillian Anderson stuff on 99 as well?

>>294501
Believe it or not, no. I think 7chan originated the Gillian Anderson fascination, and it since spread.

I will admit that whoever this jolly spammer is piqued my interest in her.

>>294502
Fair enough, it's just a bit jarring to see the same posts/pictures on different imageboards.
Also I've been knocking one out to Gillian since I was a nipper.

>>294505
If you grew up or at least hit puberty in the 90s, odds are you rubbed one out to her. I'll admit my interest in her didn't come until much later, as at the time, I didn't care for X-Files (I prefer cartoons/animation to live-action TV). I've started watching it, and boy, it was a fun show. I suppose I was too young to have an appreciation for it, really.

>>294508
It's odd, I grew up in the 90s but hadn't even heard of the X-files or Gillian Anderson until a few years ago. Never seen it on TV or even referenced somewhere other than on imageboards.

>>294514

How is that even possible? It was absolutely everywhere. I've never really watched it properly (though I'd like to now), but I was very aware of it.

>>294514

Not recognising a reference to something doesn't mean you didn't see the reference.
Once you have seen it, you'll see lots of references, but you won't suddenly remember all the references you'd not twigged previously.

>>294518
I didn't mean a reference to a character or a particular plot feature, I just meant literally by name. In the same way I've not seen Citizen Kane, but I know about it because it gets mentioned in newspaper articles, or by a character in another film. I'm sure the X-files get references like this too, it's just a really weird coincidence that I've never seen one.

>>294520

I find it much easier to believe you'd heard it mentioned by name and have simply forgotten than that you never ever saw it mentioned before.

>>294521
Well perhaps, I suppose my memory isn't the best.

>>291575
I think we can agree to that.

>>294536
I know I can.

>>291405
If my missus was half as pretty as her, she'd turn into a cow after all the babies I'd put in her.

>>294637
If our beloved wives looked anything like her, she would never be barren. She would always be bloated with kids.

>>294676
Unless your net worth is in the multimillions, that would be a deathly unsafe idea for your wife. Women need at least a year before having another child.

I remember Simon Pegg's character in Spaced enjoying a few good wanks to her.

>>291408
>voted Tony Blair into power

You maniacs,
You blew it up!

>>295150
Damn yous!

>>291423
>big nipples

I see no problem there. DEM NIPZ.

>>295166
I certainly don't have a problem. She's got a beautiful pair of nipples. I'd certainly love to suck on 'em.

>>295170
They're gorgeous. She has nipples fit for a mother. You can tell little Oscar fed from them by their shape.

>>295249
I'm not sure whether to find that endearing or creepy.

>>295588
Who cares? She has a delightful pair of nippulars and that is all that matters.

That woman is the epitome of a mother I'd like to fuck.

You're welcome

>>296105

>>296105
Was posted here >>291393 and >>291400 deemed it fake. Looks pretty real to me though.

>>296149
From the legitimate glimpses of her bubs in films, i'd say they were the genuine article.
Some things are best left unknown.

>>291405

Don't say that kinda shit man, I like to imagine I'm still young, and that I have something in common with the teenagers I bed.

>>291393

These images, much like the ones of Lorraine Kelly that people keep posting here as legitimate nudes, are in fact fake, and rather well known to be fake at that.

People on here are terribly gullible

>>296355

>>296389

Sarcasm aside, the Sport newspaper used to do a magazine (Adult Sport I think it was called) which used to include dirty celebrity fanfics and fake nudes. Those Gillian Anderson pics were in there as were the Lorraine Kelly ones...they were fakes

>>296355

Lorraine Kelly denied that those pictures were of her, so obviously they're 100% legit.

>>296460

It's the Tulisa principle - there are millions of fake nudes and lookalikes out there which nobody bothers to deny.

Is this one legit?

>>296465

Yes.

>>296465
This one's better, though.

From the movie Straightheads (Closure for Yanks).

>>296569
Fun fact, she was pregnant at the time this scene was shot. While the rest of the movie was shot in November/December (she just gave birth to Oscar), that particular shot was filmed in May.
http://gillianandersonfanclub.blogspot.com/2008/01/trascrizione-del-commento-adl-dvd-di.html

>>296465
Why don't we ask her?

>>297929
Alas, another shoop.

What the fuck was she thinking upon agreeing to share a sex scene with Danny Dyer?

>>300054

Probably "is it in yet?"

>>300054
Something along the lines of "Shit, I'm really short of cash this month."

>>300054
Probably, "After this, you'll never have to go nude again."

Is it the OP that keeps bumping this thread back from the stone age?

>>301218
Doesn't look like it, but don't worry about it happening again.

>>301304
That means the thread has been heavied and I can post in it without saging oh JOY!

>>300054
"Will he be the 46th? Or was he the 47th? I lost count long ago."