- Files: GIF, JPG, PNG, Maximum:5000 KB, Thumbnails: 600x600 pixels
- Currently 586 unique user posts. View catalogue
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ First 100 posts ] [ Last 50 posts ]
Posting mode: Reply[ Reply ]
Expand all images.
|>>|| No. 62755
The name alone is the quintisenstial mental slag moniker. Amy Substance-Abuser would be worse, maybe.
|>>|| No. 62756
Why doesn't National action just change its name to national tractor or summit so they don't all go to prison? They could still advocate killing about 20% of the population but would also restore old tractors which might chill them out a bit.
|>>|| No. 62757
She looks like a lass I knew from a while back, who was legit mental and a bit of a slag.
|>>|| No. 62758
You can tell from the way her coat is bulging that she's got absolutely massive titties.
If she had one of those stupidly short fringes which finish above the eyebrows and a few naff tattoos then there'd be at least one lad here praying that she starts dating his son.
|>>|| No. 62759
>The only reason I even decided to become active in the far right was National Action – without which I’d have absolutely no desire to be involved. The intelligence and whit of the members is of a high quality, the members are young, fit and focussed, the memes are magical and the goals are radical. Out of all of those though, I’d say it was the intelligence and anti-thug image of the group that really drew me – and of course, the energy the members draw from the strong possibility of revolution, it’s contagious. I despised other UK groups for giving such a noble cause an undisciplined, uneducated face… we are far removed from.
Oh she's a fruitloop alright.
|>>|| No. 62760
I'd exterminate millions all over her face IYKWIM.
|>>|| No. 62761
I've already got a big titty goth gf, but I never realised I wanted a big titty nazi gf.
Can confirm. Our lass wears the same sort of coat and she wonders why people in shops often suspect her of stealing stuff. I tell her it's because she looks as though she's trying to smuggle out a pair of watermelons.
|>>|| No. 62762
She didn't even win the competition, some mental Scottish Slag did.
Anyway, I'd always assumed from the way national action are portrayed in the media that they're a sinister and violent organisation. I didn't realise it was a load of internet sperglords spamming memes who would almost certainly shit themselves if they ever had to face confrontation in real life.
|>>|| No. 62763
I can't imagine groups like national action aren't full of if not entirely run by spooks. Any sort of extremist group in this country left or right is going to be infiltrated quick sharp, especially ones that advertise themselves.
Although most likely by undercover coppers who just want to get their nob wet.
|>>|| No. 62764
There are lots of cops in White Nationalist groups, especially over the pond.
|>>|| No. 62766
Between the Weight Watchers and the Football Lads Alliance rallies I'm going to be rolling in fanny!
I'm going to have to get fat and slap on a few swastika tats, but I suppose that's just the cost of doing business.
|>>|| No. 62770
Wasn't it only seeing his son's cock he had an issue with?
Wait a minute, did he even have an issue with seeing his son's erect penis? I bet he didn't, the bloody pervert.
|>>|| No. 62771
IS it bad that i take more issue over the tattoo on her forehead than the massive swastika on her tit?
|>>|| No. 62772
I was so distracted by the length of her neck I didn't even notice. Evidently she believes herself to have superior genetics by her ability to eat leaves off high branches.
|>>|| No. 62774
Think about it. When the apocalypse is brought about by the inevitable race war as resources become increasingly scarce it's the fashy-longnecks who will have the advantage. Darwin foretold of this.
|>>|| No. 62777
You know what they say about girls with big necks...
|>>|| No. 62781
I'm beginning to suspect that NA is just one big ironic shitpost that crossed into real life.
|>>|| No. 62782
I'm fairly certain based on the sample of this thread that it is just a t-shirt company pulling the 'United colours of benetton' shit, just from a different angle.
|>>|| No. 62783
From what I've read about them they appear to be a load of shut in teenagers larping as white supremacists.
Just look at the other dweebs on trial.
>Mr Jameson said Scothern's father thought he had been 'groomed' and 'brainwashed'.
>He added: 'News of the imminent ban parked an explosive exchange of texts between Scothern and his father. The latter warned his son he risked being stabbed or sent to prison.
>Scothern replied 'I'd rather [be] stabbed than submit to my enemies and allow my continent to be given to invaders where the fuck is your honour and pride'. His father responded 'you sound a bit brainwashed are you being groomed'.'
Look at him, the fucking flaccid cock.
|>>|| No. 62784
Apparently he was in antifa, was transgender and going by the name Amelia, converted to Shamanism and then he joined national action.
They're all fucking headcases.
|>>|| No. 62785
Sounds exactly the phases I would expect a teenager with a low sense of personal identity and validation to go through in the last few years based on the recent cultural climate.
When I was young people got there sense of self from becoming fanatical about music genres. I could easily see kids these days with the sheer heavy handedness of online articles going through 'what gender are you' and complaining about white people. Becoming a fascist seems like the natural rebound of an adolescent mind to go to the polar opposite when they question the validity of the first idea.
|>>|| No. 62786
There's not a lot left that will actually shock your parents. When I was a lad, you could just get your nose pierced and dye your hair green and you'd be pretty much guaranteed to make your mum cry. If you're currently in your late teens, there's a very real chance that your parents met while off their tits at the Hacienda, so dressing like a weirdo and listening to some horrible racket just isn't going to cut the mustard.
|>>|| No. 62787
If any of you are interested in the cause, join a local B&H group. Avoid NA and the like, they're honey pots.
|>>|| No. 62788
Brighton and Hove?
Benson and hedges?
Bumming and homosexuality?
What on earth are you blathering and hollering about? Stormfag.
Also maybe I like sticking my dick in the honey pot did you think of that? That seems like the only possible reason I'd even pretend to agree with these ideas.
|>>|| No. 62807
Don't want to sound like 'that guy', but what has she actually done wrong?
|>>|| No. 62809
Thanks, now I'm clued up on all the latest far-right workout hashtags, this is exactly how I wanted to spend my Friday.
She was a member of National Action and personally involved in their recruitment. NA are a prescribed organisation who advocate militant daft woggery in the UK.
Of course, it's all just banter and memes, so they're not really a thread, *wink wink* *nudge nudge*.
|>>|| No. 62812
Is the organisation still a threat if they are indirectly advocating the genocide of countless zygotes? [5 marks]
|>>|| No. 62914
Even divorced from the whole "she's a massive Nazi" thing, she looks really boring. But you wouldn't even be able to do boring stuff like watch TV because she'd keep asking if the lads from Flight of the Conchords where Jewish. I don't know, it was nice of West Midlands Police to show us her boobs but she's just some tumblr girl with more swastikas.
And an air rifle apparently. Are they used for anything other than torturing cats btw?
|>>|| No. 62916
TARGET SHOOTING IS A RELATIVELY POPULAR HOBBY, AND YOU CAN USE THE MORE POWERFUL ONES TO GO LAMPING (RABBIT HUNTING) WHICH IS BASICALLY THE ONLY HUNTING YOU CAN DO IN THIS COUNTRY WITHOUT A LOAD OF LICENCES AND LEGAL TWADDLE.
I IMAGINE MOST AIR RIFLES THAT GET BOUGHT GET USED ONCE OR TWICE BEFORE PEOPLE GET BORED OF THEM OR GET THEM TAKEN OFF THEM BECAUSE THEY SHOT THEIR LITTLE BROTHER IN THE ARSE.
Hers looks like a dirt cheap springer with a useless ten quid scope on it. I doubt you could hit a cat with it if you wanted to.
|>>|| No. 62917
I dunno, lad. Every time I see that picture where you can see her boobs I'm fighting the urge to bash one out.
She reminds me of a girl I know from university who was incredibly chatty via text or instant messaging but painfully shy and quiet in person, unless she was drunk. She'd also do things like wearing face paint and cat ear headbands so a bet she shagged like a minx. Last I heard of her she was dating someone in his thirties who still acted and dressed like a 15 year old emo kid.
|>>|| No. 62920
>LAST I HEARD OF HER SHE WAS DATING SOMEONE IN HIS THIRTIES WHO STILL ACTED AND DRESSED LIKE A 15 YEAR OLD EMO KID.
So you're saying I have a chance?
|>>|| No. 62922
Her name didn't begin with an S and end with an A did it?
If so, I am that thirties bloke and you're right, she shags like an absolute minx.
|>>|| No. 62924
Depends on whether you've got a bit floppy fringe or not.
It did not.
So are these Brexit slags any different from the white supremacist slags or when the Israeli army keeps publishing pictures of fit female soldiers? Is using attractive women an inherently right wing recruiting tactic? Is this where Labour and the left are getting it all wrong. Where are the hope not hate slags? The slags of antifa?
|>>|| No. 62936
>Is using attractive women an inherently right wing recruiting tactic?
The right wing has been using this tactic for most of the 20th centrty, turns out for all the joking about "I'd swear my alligance to X for her IYKWIM" is genuinely true for a lot of men, or at least is enough to draw them in enough to get them to at least listen under, their own agenda that they might get their willy wet. As for use by the left? Used to The modern left largely finds the idea that a man would find one women more sexually attractive then another and might make decisions based on it disgusting, so they take the 'moral high ground' you get the occassional vegan trying to sell morals with their tits though.
|>>|| No. 62947
Sorry lads but I don't get it. She's cute enough but not really that striking, and the teeth are on the wrong side of toff for me.
This is like the time when you were all on about that trainspotter's missus.
|>>|| No. 62952
Listen, Beatrice, I know your sister has stolen your thunder but this is no way to behave. Just fix your hair a little and sort the posture out in photos.
|>>|| No. 62953
I think part of the attractiveness stems from the fact she's actually doing something.
The most I've ever been attracted to someone in the flesh happened on a trip to Jorvik when I was talking to an Australian archaeologist working there. She was pleasant enough to look at but the fact she was an archaeologist and was passionately talking about her work made her irresistible to me. I was there with my girlfriend. She was livid. Similarly, I used to drive past a garage on my old commute where they had a female mechanic. The sight of her in overalls got me hot under the collar.
I suppose it's a highly patronising way to look at women, having very low expectations that they'll have a hobby or interest in something but it's a massive turn on when one of them actually does.
|>>|| No. 62957
I don't think it's patronising, not neccesarily, but then I'm a bloke so I wouldn't. Regardless, something I both believe myself and think I've heard discussed here is that a good way to become more attractive is to have a genuine interest in something, and while the discussions here have been from a male perspective I think it holds true in the reverse too. I reckon one of the more unattractive things you can say to a woman is "I don't care" too.
Is that shopped or is that one of those posh cunt breeders who ruin animals with a Habsperg-like mindset towards beauty?
|>>|| No. 62970
With a bit of considered brevity, this aside could easily be a Letterbocks contribution
|>>|| No. 62971
Will we ever solve the mystery of why Hitchens' hog's eye keeps spewing Yakult?
|>>|| No. 62998
>a paedo who loves little boys
What did you expect? We didn't call them gay racists for nothing, you know.
|>>|| No. 63000
What are the BNP even up to these days? I can't remember the last time I heard about nick Griffin.
|>>|| No. 63003
Obvious joke incoming; how can you be a carpet-bagger if you're only 12 yourself?
|>>|| No. 63008
According to the person who blew the whistle on paedolad he wanted to kill his MP, even though he knew nothing about her, because he assumed she was a puppet of the Jews letting immigrants in to weaken the white race. He also wanted to kill a police officer because she was investigating him and planned to wear a fake suicide vest in the hope the police would kill him so he wouldn't have to stand trial for being a filthy paedo.
|>>|| No. 63030
Them being moronic teenagers makes a hell of a lot of sense, actually. Being right wing is the new way to get back at Dad.
|>>|| No. 63031
A ton of underage voters in the US love Trump so it explains a lot really
|>>|| No. 63032
They're public school kids and the granddaughters of Sir Alistair Grant. I think it's safe to say they're dyed in the wool Tories. Bit laughable of them to talk about parliament being out of touch with 'real' people, mind.
Teenagers these days are weird. When I was 15 I was out getting pissed on cheap vodka or getting stoned. I wasn't joining Jimmy Saville on marches or posting on Twitter about the will of the people.
|>>|| No. 63035
I went on marches about the invasion of Iraq. That was different. Powerful elites lied and used spurious reasoning to justify the invasion, which had no conceivable benefits, whereas Brexit...
|>>|| No. 63337
Airbrushing and low-res images really can be a blessing for some. I swear I'm the fittest man alive (in 480p).
|>>|| No. 63338
They were doing it with women on TV in the 60s (you only need to watch an old star trek to see it). The common man or woman doing it and representing it as themselves in every day life is a microcosm for most of what is wrong with social media. Not because it is a thing wrong with the technology it self, but it turns out as a species we are competitive naracists.
|>>|| No. 63342
I recently rejoined facebook and am surprised to see that even old women have their pictures airbrushed and posed like emo kids from 15 years ago
|>>|| No. 63343
I feel like you and auto correct came up with a better word than I intended so let's go with that.
|>>|| No. 63344
Well it still works. New age racialists are obsessed with proving that their races are the best so use camera trickery to make them look as good as possible.
|>>|| No. 63349
Looks like she owns a lizard
Looks like she has a keen interest in the Tumuli of the Lizard Peninsula
|>>|| No. 63351
I look nothing like her, I'm not even a women or gay, and taken. But if you took me on a date to castle Howard traction engine rally I'd probably put out.
|>>|| No. 63352
Don't know about fully put out, but I would certainly allow my (inappropriate) partner a crafty feel.
|>>|| No. 63467
>The jury in the trial of four people alleged to have been members of a banned neo-Nazi daft militant wog group has been discharged after failing to reach verdicts.
>The 11-member jury had been deliberating for more than 37 hours, but was unable to reach verdicts on any of the defendants. Discharging the jurors, the recorder of Birmingham, Judge Melbourne Inman QC, thanked them for their hard work in a trial that had reached its 11th week.
Imagine working for 11 weeks only for the jury to say "idk lol" at the end, so you'll have to do it all again.
|>>|| No. 63490
It still baffles me that you can go to prison for saying mean things on the internet. The Tory debate today even had ARE Rory mention hateful thoughts in his bid to win a blind date with the Shackleton.
Not that I'd call Harry a race traitor (American isn't a race) but...come on.
|>>|| No. 63491
It just seems a bit futile, given that Americans can say pretty much whatever they like thanks to the First Amendment. I don't see how locking up a couple of arseholes will make a blind bit of difference to the amount of racist bollocks on the internet. It's like arresting someone for pissing into a swimming pool full of piss, when there's a yank over at the deep end filling it up with a piss firehose.
|>>|| No. 63493
i think what people fail to consider is what happens if the shoe ends up on the other foot.
it's all well and good locking people up for hate speech when you're under a largely liberal consensus where the hate speech is dolphin rape and homophobia. it's perfectly peachy right now to consider freedom of speech a luxury that can be compromised for the greater good. but what happens if we find ourselves under a different consensus, and suddenly those liberal progressive ideals are the exact things that will get you locked up? where will you find recourse when you already supported the precedent that freedom of speech can be safely ignored as long as you have public opinion on your side?
you don't have to look far back in time to see examples of progressive liberal cultures falling back in the opposite direction, and seeing that exact thing happen. it angers and frustrates me that people are so willing to ignore those historical lessons.
|>>|| No. 63494
In fairness, I think there's a meaningful difference between political speech and direct incitement to violence. "Dwarves are a threat to the British way of life" is nasty but legal, while "kill all the dwarves before they rape your cat" is criminal. "Hate speech" is a really dodgy category that is open to abuse, but deciding whether someone is encouraging murder is far more clear-cut.
|>>|| No. 63495
Yeah agreed totally - National Action weren't just posting bullshit on the internet.
|>>|| No. 63496
>it angers and frustrates me that people are so willing to ignore those historical lessons.
It comes from an arrogance of the status quo. "The people in the past were wrong though we are right", and it is impossible to convince people the present will be looked back at another time we were wrong in our facts and dogma just as a default, because that isn't really arguing by the rules it is a factual and relativistic nihilism people won't accept even though everything about the past tells us it is the only thing that is consistently true.
|>>|| No. 63498
If we end up under a different status quo, why would they hold themselves to the same rules anyway?
The choice may not be between a liberal world with free speech maintained, and a liberal-turned-censorious-turned nazi world where people go to jail for saying nice things, and more between a liberal world that goes nazi but some annoying people go to jail today versus a liberal world that goes nazi but was at least principled about liberalism while it lasted. I'm not arguing we're inexorably heading that way, just that if we are it's probably of little difference where we stand on censorship - I'd argue culture flows from other factors more than vice-versa. Also, I'd note the case that liberalism could always collapse precisely because we didn't go out and jail popular alt-right type, even if they didn't mean it and were only doing it for the money.
Most historical lessons are false equivalences mind you. The problem about the present is that it's so consistently stupid. People model their dystopia on past negative regimes and Orwell's book about the year Apple released the Macintosh in a futile attempt to prove that the then current year would be nothing like the then current year. The minute you realise that O'Brien's fursona is a Fennec fox and his favourite anime is K-on! is the minute the whole atmosphere of the thing collapses. Rats to the face might be a little scary, but the complete evaporation of seriousness from public life is much scarier and market forces are far more willing-and-able to promote that than they are to promote idle torture. (Though of course, they'll promote fascism if it sells t-shirts and sticks... I guess if I have a point it's that demonetisation beats jail when it comes to the big guys.)
|>>|| No. 63502
>IT'S ALL WELL AND GOOD LOCKING PEOPLE UP FOR HATE SPEECH WHEN YOU'RE UNDER A LARGELY LIBERAL CONSENSUS WHERE THE HATE SPEECH IS DOLPHIN RAPE AND HOMOPHOBIA. IT'S PERFECTLY PEACHY RIGHT NOW TO CONSIDER FREEDOM OF SPEECH A LUXURY THAT CAN BE COMPROMISED FOR THE GREATER GOOD.
Isn't this liberal consensus why we ended up with Brexit?
|>>|| No. 63893
Girls who are insufferable horsey toffs.
sound like insufferable horsey toffs.
|>>|| No. 63899
>"a destructive ideology, designed to control and oppress"
That's exactly what mad girls like her are into though, isn't it?
|>>|| No. 63900
I don't get why the fuck a 15 year old lass is so into this sort of thing. At that age I'm pretty sure my political leanings didn't go much farther than the mantra "don't be a cunt."
|>>|| No. 63901
They get attention.
And at that age you can't tell the differance between drumming up drama, and making a differance.
|>>|| No. 63905
Isn't part of the point of the XR to drum up drama so that the topic isn't ignored by those who are in a position to do something either 'our representatives' or companies looking to score some good press. They can measure their success in how many people respond. Because companies and MPs care about that shit.
This is distinctly different from teens declaring their manifesto for why everyone who doesn't share their daddies opinion that socialism is so dumb is wrong. Measuring their success by the amount of traffic they generate would not be a good metric. As it demonstrates nothing about winning hearts and minds which if you asked them would be the point of those videos. Although again I dont expect them to know the difference.
|>>|| No. 63906
Depends. If raising awareness means inconveniencing people and impeding hospitals then they're going to lose sympathy. Sage because we don't need yet another thread derailed by this.
|>>|| No. 63907
>inconveniencing people and impeding hospitals
Like Brexit or Tory policy?
|>>|| No. 63908
With such a snarky zinger I thought I was still reading comments on the Guardian.
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ First 100 posts ] [ Last 50 posts ]