[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ First 100 posts ] [ Last 50 posts ]
>> | No. 68192
68192
My money is on Princess Michael of Kent. |
>> | No. 68193
68193
images_2019-02_3fbb2b70-3062-11e9-b5ff-89575e075ee.jpg |
>> | No. 68194
68194
>>68193 |
>> | No. 68195
68195
I'm not sure how having the celebrity equivalent of a facebook teary counts as wanting to live a private life. My money is on Charles but the racial thing sounds like a bit of a fabrication, from what I gather he's keen on having a clear out of who counts as a royal. |
>> | No. 68196
68196
>>68195 |
>> | No. 68197
68197
>>68196 |
>> | No. 68198
68198
>>68196 |
>> | No. 68199
68199
>>68196 |
>> | No. 68200
68200
>>68199 |
>> | No. 68202
68202
>>68200 |
>> | No. 68203
68203
1920px-Ipatjew-Haus2.jpg Regarding the Royals I think we just need to lock them all in a room together so they can figure it out for themselves. |
>> | No. 68204
68204
>>68203 |
>> | No. 68205
68205
I really don't get it, she's barely even magnolia. You could put her in a lineup of completely ethnically "white" people and still have people darker skinned than her. |
>> | No. 68206
68206
>>68205 |
>> | No. 68207
68207
>>68206 |
>> | No. 68208
68208
>>68207 |
>> | No. 68209
68209
>>68206 |
>> | No. 68210
68210
>>68209 |
>> | No. 68211
68211
I assumed the family devide has something to do with Meghan Markles political connections. |
>> | No. 68212
68212
>>68207 |
>> | No. 68216
68216
081211_pippa_middletons_butt_600110812112751110812.jpg >>68212 |
>> | No. 68217
68217
If I got a black woman pregnant I would wonder what the baby would look like. I didn't realise this was racist. |
>> | No. 68218
68218
I've known plenty of people, my own family even, to come out with casually racist shite often enough. If the royal family isn't ten times as bad I'd be flabbergasted. I'm quite confused as to why you lads think otherwise, probably a lot of you are casually racist too, but I don't care about the royal family beyond how we, errr, get rid of them a swiftly as possible. |
>> | No. 68219
68219
>>68218 |
>> | No. 68220
68220
Can't even escape this mind numbing bullshit on this autist shed. |
>> | No. 68221
68221
>>68220 |
>> | No. 68222
68222
>>68219 |
>> | No. 68223
68223
It's possibly all the more tiresome how we're expected to have sympathy for the poor girl, she's had such a rough time of it, I bet she was starting to run out of £50 notes to dry her tears on. |
>> | No. 68224
68224
>>68223 |
>> | No. 68225
68225
Megan and Harry won't be first in line for the guillotine, that's as good as I'll give them. |
>> | No. 68226
68226
>>68224 |
>> | No. 68227
68227
Is the media in the UK just that much worse? Compared to other places. |
>> | No. 68228
68228
>>68227 |
>> | No. 68229
68229
img-1837-jpg-1575648545.jpg >>68223 |
>> | No. 68230
68230
>>68229 |
>> | No. 68231
68231
454787_1-tt-width-315-height-492-crop-1-bgcolor-ff.jpg >>68230 |
>> | No. 68232
68232
>>68227 |
>> | No. 68233
68233
>>68229 |
>> | No. 68236
68236
pierce.jpg Jesus wept. |
>> | No. 68241
68241
>>68236 |
>> | No. 68242
68242
>>68241 |
>> | No. 68244
68244
do any of you lads ever get that thing where you've got a big fat shit brewing, one that's not quite ready to drop, but certainly starting to create pressure on one's prostate, and it makes you into an irritable, maungy arsehole? |
>> | No. 68249
68249
40374650-9354141-image-a-22_1615534284415.jpg Septic Vogue are claiming the word 'niggling' was deliberately used in a headline by the Mail to be racist against Meghan. |
>> | No. 68250
68250
>>68249 |
>> | No. 68251
68251
>>68250 |
>> | No. 68252
68252
>>68251 |
>> | No. 68253
68253
>>68252 |
>> | No. 68266
68266
EwWgQ_NXAAAny3u[1].jpg |
>> | No. 68267
68267
>>68266 |
>> | No. 68268
68268
>>68266 |
>> | No. 68269
68269
>>68268 |
>> | No. 68270
68270
>>68268 |
>> | No. 68272
68272
>>68271 |
>> | No. 68273
68273
>>68272 |
>> | No. 68274
68274
>>68271 |
>> | No. 68275
68275
Not banned, I guess /iq/ must be a special case where the normal rules don't apply. |
>> | No. 68277
68277
>>68272 |
>> | No. 68280
68280
40448764-0-image-m-4_1615721792707.jpg These are quite sickly. |
>> | No. 68286
68286
>>68280 |
>> | No. 68287
68287
>>68280 |
>> | No. 68288
68288
>>68287 |
>> | No. 68289
68289
>>68287 |
>> | No. 68290
68290
>>68288 |
>> | No. 68432
68432
|
>> | No. 68433
68433
>>68432 |
>> | No. 68434
68434
>>68433 |
>> | No. 68435
68435
>>68434 |
>> | No. 68436
68436
>>68435 |
>> | No. 68437
68437
>>68436 |
>> | No. 68438
68438
>>68432 |
>> | No. 68442
68442
>Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby has contradicted British royal Meghan’s claim that she married Britain’s Prince Harry several days before the official lavish ceremony at Windsor Castle in 2018. |
>> | No. 69036
69036
E3XvYQjX0AMFmQN.jpg Julie Burchill has been sacked by the Telegraph for joking that Harry and Meghan should have named their baby Georgina Floydina. Pc gone bloody mad, can't even tell a joke these days. |
>> | No. 69037
69037
>>69036 |
>> | No. 69038
69038
>>69037 |
>> | No. 69039
69039
>>69038 |
>> | No. 69040
69040
>>69039 |
>> | No. 69041
69041
Al I'm going to say is, don't say I didn't tell you do, when thirty years down the line we live in a cultural context where the anti-pc backlash has reached roll swing and open dolphin rape is once again entirely acceptable. |
>> | No. 69042
69042
>>69041 |
>> | No. 69043
69043
>>69042 |
>> | No. 69044
69044
>>69042 |
>> | No. 69045
69045
>>69042 |
>> | No. 69046
69046
>>69045 |
>> | No. 69049
69049
there isn't really enough of a monoculture for there to be a counterculture to anymore. the self-conscious way in which people want to say "Oh, we're the new counterculture!" speaks only to the fact we've done a dismal job of finding a new direction after the 70s-90s, so instead we try to loop it in an increasingly shitty fashion. |
>> | No. 69050
69050
Eew0aVoWkAEzzrx.jpg >>69049 |
>> | No. 69051
69051
wtf I added that dog picture to a post I didn't make like six hours ago. Whatever. |
>> | No. 69053
69053
>>69046 |
>> | No. 69056
69056
>>69051 |
>> | No. 69057
69057
>>69056 |
>> | No. 69058
69058
dog.jpg >>69057 |
>> | No. 69059
69059
>>69036 |
>> | No. 69060
69060
>>69056>>69057>>69058 |
>> | No. 69061
69061
>>69050 |
>> | No. 69092
69092
2375.jpg You'd just shave it off by this point. |
>> | No. 69093
69093
>>69092 |
>> | No. 69094
69094
unnamed.jpg >>69092 |
>> | No. 69095
69095
>>69092 |
>> | No. 69096
69096
>>69092 |
>> | No. 69097
69097
>>69096 |
>> | No. 69098
69098
index.jpg >>69097 |
>> | No. 69099
69099
>>69097 |
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ First 100 posts ] [ Last 50 posts ]
Delete Post [] Password |