[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
random

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 346596)
Message
File  []
close
SNA1901ROLF---_1713249a.jpg
346596346596346596
>> No. 346596 Anonymous
19th April 2013
Friday 7:15 am
346596 spacer
Another breakout of the paedogeddon has struck home!

Rolph Harris being named as the next* chap what done a noncing

All just rumours at present, but he has a weird moustache, and worked with kids, therefore, nonce.
Expand all images.
>> No. 364967 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 5:36 pm
364967 spacer
>>364910

I don't know if this is propaganda but gulf new agencies has this story then around a week later it turned out it was bullshit and the kid was still with her father, someone was trying to sully his name and get him in shit, as well as the "husbands". This was never covered by western news. possibly due to lack of care or it not fitting the general plot of aren't the backwards brown people evil!
>> No. 364976 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 7:54 pm
364976 spacer
Apparently H from Steps has quit Twitter because of abuse from people thinking he was the other Ian Watkins.
>> No. 364978 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 8:14 pm
364978 spacer

stevewho.png
364978364978364978
>>364976
While it's a bad thing that quite a few people misidentified him, what the fuck is wrong with the world when it's down to Steve Brookstein to correct him? I mean, Steve Brookstein.


No, me neither.
>> No. 364979 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 8:18 pm
364979 spacer
>>364976
I abused him too, just to egg on the morons. I don't know why. Maybe I was bored.
>> No. 364980 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 8:24 pm
364980 spacer
>>364976
It seems he was getting death threats on Facebook. I mean, I know his music was shit, but that's a bit much.
>> No. 364981 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 8:31 pm
364981 spacer
FWIW, Ian "Nonce" Watkins' Twitter account is still up. His last activity appears to have been live-tweeting one of the Twilight films.
>> No. 364982 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 8:34 pm
364982 spacer
>>364976
Every cloud...
>> No. 364983 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 8:37 pm
364983 spacer
At one point did he have a H on his forehead like Rimmer did or have I just muddled up my memory?
>> No. 364984 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 8:44 pm
364984 spacer

2.png
364984364984364984

>> No. 364985 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 8:59 pm
364985 spacer
>>364944

It has all the smack of urban myth about it to me, once you've done that you're basically looking at murder. Genital areas bleed a LOT, babies are small and don't have that much blood to begin with. Logically speaking no one would do this unless they were planning to kill / despose of the body afterwards.

Sage because I don't really even want to think about this any more. Off to find some brain bleach, or at least cider.
>> No. 364988 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 9:22 pm
364988 spacer
>>364985

The mother in one case called an ambulance due to there being a lot of blood in the nappy, this had happened before but her husband told her it was normal and she believed him (why?) This time was worse, though.

The paramedic took one look and called the police who called the social work. As soon as he walked in she nodded to the police and he was arrested, he screamed "She's a liar!" Even though nothing had been said. He admitted to it all down the station, and it came out in court so it should, at least partly barring the names of the kids, be public record.

It happened in Stirlingshire, she worked for Stirling council.
>> No. 364993 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 9:31 pm
364993 spacer
>>364988
dude
every post you write makes my heart sink down to my anus
>> No. 364995 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 9:38 pm
364995 spacer
>>364988>>364993

Seconded. I don't think cider's going to be enough.
>> No. 364998 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 9:44 pm
364998 spacer
>>364988
Did the baby survive? I bet the baby will grow up to become a nonce as well.
>> No. 365000 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 9:56 pm
365000 spacer
>>364978
Christ. I completely forgot he existed. Poor Steve. Joining the ranks of Michelle McManus, Joe McElderry, Shayne Ward, that brother and sister band with the creepy incestuous undertones, and that bloke who was a decorator I think. Those who once had the support of millions of the general public, reduced to jokes and total obscurity.
>> No. 365002 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 10:10 pm
365002 spacer
This thread is bleak. It becomes worse when I imagine the ripples stories like this will cause. I have a horrible feeling that when something like this enters the public consciousness, there are only really a few predictable common reactions. Most will react with anger and disgust, for others it'll open itself up to jokes and banter, and for the final few there'll be that imaginative spark the taboo will capture in their minds...

Someone please do tell me if I'm being a twat. I just really don't possibly see what good could come of opening certain details up to the public. There seems to be nothing constructive in it. It feels like the lowest of journalists are always out there are looking for the ultimate 'gross out' story, not for the sake of meaningful discussion, but just to grab attention. Beyond a certain point there is no purpose, no function of informing people of detail. It only provokes us emotionally and, even worse, might perpetuate the problem.

It seems to reflect on something deeply unhealthy in our national psyche that things like the exact nature of dirty talk and acts seen in pictures are considered worthwhile public discourse. It's a fixation and it disturbs me.
>> No. 365003 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 10:11 pm
365003 spacer
>>364995

Sorry.

This is somewhat cathartic. I've never told another soul.

People bringing it into question is quite frustrating seeing as I've literally seen the case files sitting on my coffee table. That it's hard for some people to concieve of is a blessing, though. It's horrible.

The baby survived, he had 2 other daughters to the same woman that were similarly disfigured which came out after he was arrested. How the Mother didn't notice is beyond me, she must have done.

Anyway, I think I need a drink. That's only one of the cases I know about and this is bringing it all back.
>> No. 365006 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 10:21 pm
365006 spacer
>>365003

Sorry lad, I was the one who whinged about countries eralier. I know what it is like though, I deal with child abuse victims regularly enough.

Drink, it makes the pain go away.
>> No. 365007 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 10:21 pm
365007 spacer
>>365006

*earlier

Apologies. Drinking.
>> No. 365008 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 10:23 pm
365008 spacer
>>365003
The other daughters had scars caused by a razor and the mother didn't notice? Funny. Maybe she was in on it.
>> No. 365009 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 10:27 pm
365009 spacer

article-2514319-19AD9E5500000578-747_634x481.jpg
365009365009365009
The Mail are having a field day digging up pictures of him at a children's hospital.
>> No. 365018 Anonymous
27th November 2013
Wednesday 11:50 pm
365018 spacer

COULDN'T GET IT UP FOR THE BABY.jpg
365018365018365018
So yeah, "attempted" baby rape?
>> No. 365023 Anonymous
28th November 2013
Thursday 1:29 am
365023 spacer
>>365018

Maybe too much of a tight squeeze?
>> No. 365024 Anonymous
28th November 2013
Thursday 1:35 am
365024 spacer
>>365018

He arranged the baby rape but never actually did it.
>> No. 365027 Anonymous
28th November 2013
Thursday 2:15 am
365027 spacer
>>365024
In one case. In the other he was videoed having a go but didn't complete it; allegedly.
>> No. 365033 Anonymous
28th November 2013
Thursday 5:22 am
365033 spacer
>>365027

What the fuck? Jesus Christ. Videoed having a go...everything about that and this is so bad.

How long has the rampant paedo rape fest been going in with the elite in society though? It seems more and more we're barely scratching the surface and only catching a few stragglers and bottom feeders. Too much in the way of obvious cover ups and denied justice too.
>> No. 365034 Anonymous
28th November 2013
Thursday 5:27 am
365034 spacer
Clearly too many people out there nowadays need a quick response.
>> No. 365035 Anonymous
28th November 2013
Thursday 6:22 am
365035 spacer
>>365033

I suspect it's been ongoing for ages and in many societies, a combination of decadence and a sense of being untouchable probably encourages it. We are living in the degenerate times and this sort of thing will probably increase until the final stage where nomadic peoples of the Arctic control the world and we enter the final stages of darkness.
>> No. 365078 Anonymous
28th November 2013
Thursday 7:25 pm
365078 spacer
>>365035

The sad thing is that I doubt this current mania will ever touch that high level. It's just as unlikely it will change their habits or appetites. The abuse will continue once a few sacrificial lambs have been slaughtered.
>> No. 365080 Anonymous
28th November 2013
Thursday 7:31 pm
365080 spacer
I think a lot of the problem with this is also people "wasting" their focus and hate on people who have "images of children" in the papers and it turns out to be something scooped from 4chan or motherless or it's gravura type material and then there is the totally different level of secret child kidnap and sex slavery rings and secret rapes and tapes as are coming to light (and have surfaced sometimes before). Kind of like every pushing match in a heated disagreement being treated the same as a Hannibal Lecter or similar that ate or peeled their victims. It's all something the law can collar you for, but the outrage in the press and subsequently in the MSM-consuming public and then how the law and society treats all these people seems all so disproportionate and counter productive so far.
>> No. 365395 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 3:18 pm
365395 spacer

tumblr_mwyearorp51qi04dbo1_500.png
365395365395365395
>>365002
A good post, but the public appetite for these details seems insatiable. There's paedophiliac clickbait every day on the Mail website. There are shelves full of painful lives memoirs in every supermarket which are so lurid in 'daddy touched my no-no' detail that they amount to illegal pornography.

There are many stories about Watkins and fans online, some of which contradict mainstream news narratives, some of which support them, some of which give a hint of the many things we don't know about his background and secrets. It's actually a much more disturbing case than anything the Savile stuff threw up and I honestly wish I hadn't started reading about it.
>> No. 365417 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 6:19 pm
365417 spacer
And so it begins. Just saw an item on the news referring to "the paedophile Ian Watkins".
>> No. 365420 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 6:26 pm
365420 spacer
>>365417
Not seeing what your point is here - there's video evidence of him trying to fuck a baby.
>> No. 365421 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 6:29 pm
365421 spacer
>>365420

Err...what?
>> No. 365422 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 6:33 pm
365422 spacer
>>365421
As >>365420 says, the prosecution has the videos that one of the mothers took in a hotel in London of him trying to fuck an 11 month old child. What he actually admitted to was attempted rape rather than actual rape - for whatever reason, he didn't complete the act but he did admit to trying - he absolutely qualifies as being called a paedophile, he admitted the offence.
>> No. 365423 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 6:54 pm
365423 spacer
>>365422
A person who attempts murder isn't a murderer. Therefore, a person who attempts to rape a baby, is not a paedophile.
>> No. 365424 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 6:54 pm
365424 spacer
>>365422

Maybe I'm getting things confused then...I didn't realise he was on camera trying to do the deed. What a LAD.
>> No. 365425 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 6:55 pm
365425 spacer
>>365423
Oh do me a favour. He admitted 11 offences.
>> No. 365431 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 8:57 pm
365431 spacer
>>365423

A paedophile is someone who fancies young kids. You don't have to rape or attempt to rape someone to be a paedo. Just as you can have other fetishes or fantasies without acting on them. So he is almost certainly a paedo and his own admission puts that almost in stone, the only sane thing to debate is if he is a rapist or not. He has admitted to attempting to RAPE A BABY.

I mean, fucking hell, he admitted to trying to RAPE A BABY. That the thought of RAPING A BABY ON CAMERA would come into your head and you'd then decide to have a go is undeniable extreme paedo rapist territory. He knows that with everything lined up against him he's even more fucked than the kids he abused and is obviously starting to bargain in the hope of not dying in prison.

Being a paedophile is in itself not a crime. Just as having a rape or bondage fantasy or dreaming of being Lex Luthor is not a crime. Acting on something illegal, for example attempting to RAPE A BABY ON CAMERA, along with several other offences, is the crime. What the fuck was he thinking? The guy is a dangerous fruitloop. It's like seeing a chasm into an alien world. How does your life lead you to that point as the right thing to do?

This is why I am stocking my shed-bunker.
>> No. 365433 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 9:00 pm
365433 spacer
>>365422
>he absolutely qualifies as being called a paedophile, he admitted the offence.
Do enlighten us as to when paedophilia became an offence. It would be like referring to someone convicted of anally raping men as "the notorious homosexual John Smith".

This sort of labelling isn't helpful. It's almost as if his life up to this point has ceased to be. It's utterly wrong-headed, and leads to the sort of nonsense where Gary Glitter's contribution to music is forgotten, or people start suing charities to get a slice of the money Jimmy Savile left them.
>> No. 365435 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 9:03 pm
365435 spacer
>>365433

Well being a homosexual was a crime at one point, so in a somewhat recent historic context it would work.

Gary Glitter? Didn't they hang him?
>> No. 365438 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 9:15 pm
365438 spacer
>>365435
>Well being a homosexual was a crime at one point
No, lad. The crime was buggery, not merely being gay. If you didn't act it out, there was no offence committed.
>> No. 365440 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 9:24 pm
365440 spacer
>>365438

Just as God would have wanted it. He gets very cross if you do dirty bum stuff. That's not what he put it there for.
>> No. 365443 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 9:36 pm
365443 spacer

ian-watkins.jpg
365443365443365443
>>365431
>What the fuck was he thinking? The guy is a dangerous fruitloop. It's like seeing a chasm into an alien world. How does your life lead you to that point as the right thing to do?

The twitlonger posted from the woman who shopped him - no saint herself, being a batty hooker who did incest-themed escorting with Watkins - clearly states that he was abused horribly in childhood and had confided this to her around the time his descent into the drugs and truly awful perversions began. Not a fan of his terrible music but in retrospect the video and lyrics to A Town Called Hypocrisy really do tell a tale. This story is extremely distressing whichever way you look at it. If he'd got arrested when first reported back in 2008 or tried to get the help he needed before then a whole lot of people who depended on him for their income would have been stuffed - not just family but other band members, employees etc. Fucking capitalism wins again.
>> No. 365444 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 9:58 pm
365444 spacer
>>365443
That photo looks rather uncomfortable in hindsight.
>> No. 365445 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 10:07 pm
365445 spacer

nR27Q.gif
365445365445365445
>>365444
Have this gif instead then.
>> No. 365449 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 10:35 pm
365449 spacer
If you said in public this guy was a paedo and he sued you for it and then later this came to light, how would that work out, legally speaking?
>> No. 365453 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 11:19 pm
365453 spacer
>>365443
>clearly states that he was abused horribly in childhood
Like I said before in this thread. People who get abused will end up a paedophile. So it is best to put down paedophiles and whoever they abuse.
>> No. 365454 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 11:21 pm
365454 spacer
>>365449
He would not have sued you as he enjoyed all the gossip. There were people calling him a paedo online years ago.

However if he had sued (see Jeffrey Archer, Monica Coughlan and the Daily Star) he could later be tried for perjury and perverting the course of justice after the baby-diddling came to light.

Here is Ian Watkins' tumblr which largely consisted of his reprints of fawning messages from young fans together with a .gs-worthy grammar nazi slant: http://armyofthedead.tumblr.com/
>> No. 365455 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 11:35 pm
365455 spacer
>>365454

Proving once again the strong link between paedophilia and grammar nazi tendencies. The more anal you are, the more likely you are to fiddle a kid. And that's a fact.
>> No. 365456 Anonymous
1st December 2013
Sunday 11:44 pm
365456 spacer
>>365453

I think the biggest problem is the media frenzy and mob mentality that thinks the solution is to simply lock people up and hope it all goes away, rather than deal with complicated social and psychological problems.
>> No. 365458 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 12:36 am
365458 spacer
>>365453
I guess you're attempting to troll but that makes as much sense as saying everyone who takes an excess of speedy drugs will end up a paedophile. The two in conjunction together with ego problems and feeling of untouchability made him do what he did.
>> No. 365459 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 12:58 am
365459 spacer
>>365456
There is no way anyone can fix such psychological problems. The best thing to do would be to cut your losses, and put down both the perpetrator and victim.

>>365458
I am not trolling. I have said this many times before in this thread. Almost all paedophiles have been, in some way, victimised sexually when they were young. It isn't a coincidence. It is sad—what happened to them—but they should be put down for the greater good, security and protection for all the children in our society.
>> No. 365460 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 1:07 am
365460 spacer
>>365449
Wouldn't make a difference unless he specifically submitted evidence stating expliitly that he was not a nonce. In that case, he'd be looking at doubling his prison time with perjury charges. Otherwise, in a libel trial it would have been for you to prove definitively that he was a nonce (and that it was in the legitimate interest of every single person you told to know it). The facts coming out now would not have any bearing on you making those claims then.

>>365454
>(see Jeffrey Archer, Monica Coughlan and the Daily Star)
Nope. He was charged with perjury because the evidence he gave in court was fabricated.
>> No. 365461 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 1:14 am
365461 spacer
>>365459
Please express your views on how all victims of child abuse inevitably become perpetrators so should be put down directly to Shy Keenan. She'd rip you a new one.
>> No. 365473 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 2:38 am
365473 spacer
>>365461
>Rip you a new one.
I am sure she would love to do that. Maybe she wishes I were a kid, so it would be that much more sensual for her.

>Child-sex-abuse-survivor
Does she wear a badge that states that? She should be put down for milking it and for having a stupid name. What kind of name is Shy?

Most paedophiles were nonced at a young age. You can't disprove that.
>> No. 365475 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 2:43 am
365475 spacer
>Shy Keenan
>In 2013 Keenan's fourteen-year-old son Ayden Olson was discovered dead within his home, having committed suicide. Keenan has maintained that her son was "bullied to death" and has started a campaign called "Ayden's Law" that requests that the Prime Minister create a new anti-bullying law.
>> No. 365479 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 3:06 am
365479 spacer
>>365453

This would ensure that virtually all abuse would go unreported. Kids would stay silent because they don't want to die. Parents who do find out would allow their kids to be nonced rather than risk seeing them murdered by the state. Peados would try to brave it out instead of getting the help available for them and eventually lapse and start offending.

Your "best solution" would cause a noncing spree of epic proportions. No child would be free from an adult's cock or pussy.
>> No. 365481 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 3:21 am
365481 spacer
>>365479
It wouldn't. Children should get health check-ups at school weekly, unannounced. Any discrepancies will immediately get reported, and the families involved will be put under secret surveillance. If it turns out that noncing took place, all the people connected to the case—those who kept quiet, those who nonced, those who got nonced—will all get dawn raided and put down. News corporation won't be allowed to report it (either through D-Notice, super-injunctions, and threats).

Thus, we shall have a future where no noncing takes place.
>> No. 365482 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 3:26 am
365482 spacer
>>365481

Adolf, is that you?
>> No. 365483 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 3:27 am
365483 spacer
>>365481

You mean check-ups to see if the hymen is intact etc? Such spurious "medical tests" are abusive in themselves.
>> No. 365488 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 3:35 am
365488 spacer

shy fx.png
365488365488365488
>>365473

I'm trying to find a picture of Shy FX looking cross, but apparently he doesn't do facial expressions.
>> No. 365489 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 3:42 am
365489 spacer
>>365482
Godwin's law?

>>365483
It doesn't have to be that intrusive, but if the situation calls for it, then yes. It is not abuse, it is for the good of everyone. You sound like you love people getting nonced.

>>365488
Is this a new fad? Disgusting names.
>> No. 365491 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 3:46 am
365491 spacer
>>365489

I'm just wondering what type of person would be going for the role of examiner. Also, I've heard that giving very young children enemas can cause psychological problems because they don't know if it's "for their own good" or not.
>> No. 365494 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 4:04 am
365494 spacer
>>365491
Enemas? Well, it appears you have better imagination than I do. In any event, what I have pointed out is to keep them safe, lest them become nonces themselves in the future. Who the hell cares what children think?

Anyone who develops psychological problems because of my methods to keep the safe, will be put down on their 18th birthday. If you weed out all the troublesome lot in a society, it will be purified and much, much better.
>> No. 365495 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 4:09 am
365495 spacer
>>365494

Can we kill the Jews and Blacks while we are at it too?
>> No. 365497 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 4:14 am
365497 spacer
What realistic and reliable check up for males and females are there for virginity and all sexual activity that could be applied?
>> No. 365498 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 4:16 am
365498 spacer
>>365489

>Godwin's law?

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1. What's your point?
>> No. 365501 Anonymous
2nd December 2013
Monday 9:29 am
365501 spacer
>>365459

FOR THE GREATER GOOD.
>> No. 365601 Anonymous
3rd December 2013
Tuesday 11:22 pm
365601 spacer
>>365501
THE GREATER GOOD.
>> No. 365602 Anonymous
3rd December 2013
Tuesday 11:29 pm
365602 spacer
>>365601
SHUT IT
>> No. 365665 Anonymous
4th December 2013
Wednesday 10:13 pm
365665 spacer

4chan.jpg
365665365665365665
...and so noncery was discussed long into the night, until the dawn broke and the spirit of christmas entered their hearts, and all parties agreed that hatred towards pedophiles is at best a mixed blessing.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 366599 Anonymous
15th December 2013
Sunday 9:57 pm
366599 spacer
>Paedophile rocker Ian Watkins is set to rake in £100,000 from Lostprophets music that has been broadcast and bought since he was charged with disgusting sex crimes, it has been claimed.

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/ian-watkins-set-rake-100000-6404915

Sounds like there hasn't been any lost profits.
>> No. 366602 Anonymous
15th December 2013
Sunday 11:07 pm
366602 spacer
>>365665
You ought to know by now. There's lots of perverts on the Internet.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 366609 Anonymous
16th December 2013
Monday 1:01 am
366609 spacer
>>366599

I never heard any Lost Prophets music before this happened. I got curious and watched a couple of his videos on YouTube. Ugh. As if his crimes against music weren't enough.
>> No. 366610 Anonymous
16th December 2013
Monday 1:07 am
366610 spacer
>>366609
>Lost Prophets
It's actually written Lostprophets. Crimes against the English Language, too.
>> No. 366611 Anonymous
16th December 2013
Monday 1:12 am
366611 spacer
>>366610

They were known as "Lozt Prophetz" before 1999.
>> No. 366612 Anonymous
16th December 2013
Monday 1:13 am
366612 spacer
>>366611

You pozitive on that?
>> No. 366617 Anonymous
16th December 2013
Monday 9:32 am
366617 spacer
>>366610

I believe they didn't even capitalise it. I know hindsight is 20/20, but all the hallmarks of a baby rapist were there from the beginning.
>> No. 366621 Anonymous
16th December 2013
Monday 11:57 am
366621 spacer
I wonder what the rest of the band are going to do now.
>> No. 366622 Anonymous
16th December 2013
Monday 12:06 pm
366622 spacer
>>366621

Probably try and forget they were ever in a band and went touring with a paedophile. God only knows what their tour bus was like.

On another note, maybe they knew and didn't do anything because they themselves are, in fact, nonces.
>> No. 366625 Anonymous
16th December 2013
Monday 12:55 pm
366625 spacer
>>366622

When in doubt there's a nonce about.
>> No. 366626 Anonymous
16th December 2013
Monday 1:03 pm
366626 spacer
>>366622

Can you imagine the groupies and who he was bringing back to the bus after the show?
>> No. 366629 Anonymous
16th December 2013
Monday 1:09 pm
366629 spacer
>>366626

You can't fool me, GCHQ lad.
>> No. 366771 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 6:44 pm
366771 spacer
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-25412675
>> No. 366773 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 7:10 pm
366773 spacer
>>366771
mega lolz
>> No. 366774 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 7:16 pm
366774 spacer
>>366773

Don't read this.

http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/r-v-watkins-and-others.pdf
>> No. 366776 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 7:25 pm
366776 spacer
>>366774
Their web server has little intention of letting me.
>> No. 366777 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 7:29 pm
366777 spacer
What really confuses me is that surely those who surround people like this rock band cunt (who I'd not heard of until his accusation and conviction) must surely know that they're nonces - they must have seen the underage kids in question being brought into caravans by this cunt. Why wouldn't they tip off the fuzz? I wonder if anyone on .gs has an interesting perspective on this concern.
>> No. 366778 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 7:46 pm
366778 spacer
>>366777

Something like being in a band is not your normal situation, especially if said band is finding success. It's similar to how it happened in the TV actor cases, lots of things go on beneath blind eyes in any industry that has such a symbiotic relationship between creative types and financial types.

The other members of the band were probably aware, simply unwilling to speak out, because without their hot marketable lead singer they would probably be back to the dayjob working at Poundland in Cardiff city centre. Lots of us would make a similar decision when faced with that stark reality. The record company execs were probably in on it too, although in a less benign manner- I'd be highly surprised if this wasn't something used to blackmail Watkins into accepting less favourable (read: more profitable) contract conditions on at least one occasion.
>> No. 366779 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 7:54 pm
366779 spacer
>>366778
I am trying hard not to be OUTRAGED AT PAEDO ENABLING SCUM but it does trouble me that the emphasis in cases like these is always on the nonce rather than the people who seemingly just let them get on with it. It's far more sinister than the noncing itself in my opinion.
>> No. 366781 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 8:41 pm
366781 spacer
>>366774

Mirror:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/r-v-watkins-and-others.pdf

It'll make you lose any apatite you had for supper.
>> No. 366782 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 8:42 pm
366782 spacer
>>366781

*Appetite

Sorry, fuck you spell checker, you betrayed me.
>> No. 366783 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 8:48 pm
366783 spacer

kek.jpg
366783366783366783
So, what's the chance of this guy getting murdered in prison?
>> No. 366784 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 8:49 pm
366784 spacer
>>366778

Hollywood and the record industry are probably more than used to sexual deviancy. The casting couch and paedophile rape and pressuring of favours is notorious and most likely a lot still to uncover.
>> No. 366785 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 8:51 pm
366785 spacer
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-25435751

>South Wales Police Det Ch Insp Peter Doyle revealed that officers recovered a total of 27 terabytes of data storage from computers and devices found in Watkins's possession.
>27 terabytes

Jesus fucking christ I don't even have one TB of legally acquired films from friends.
>> No. 366786 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 8:52 pm
366786 spacer
>>366783

Very little. They don't put people with that sort of conviction in with the general population because of the PAEDOMANIA etc.
>> No. 366787 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 8:54 pm
366787 spacer
>>366785

If he was ripping DVDs and blurays or doing movie editing I suppose you could easily get TBs of data. It doesn't say it is 27 TB of illegal paedo rape videos or some such.
>> No. 366791 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 9:13 pm
366791 spacer
>>366786

There are sometimes attacks on people who are in the nonce wing due by other prisoners in the same wings attacking the nonces.
>> No. 366801 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:05 pm
366801 spacer
>>366785
How does one even store that much data?

Was he running a fucking server or something?
>> No. 366802 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:08 pm
366802 spacer
Do they make a TB USB stick yet?
>> No. 366803 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:09 pm
366803 spacer
>>366801

It's not that hard if you use a few large HDDs and back it up onto tapes or discs.
>> No. 366804 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:09 pm
366804 spacer
>>366802

Yes.
>> No. 366806 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:11 pm
366806 spacer
>>366802

In fact here is one a couple years back that was 2TB storage.

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/ITRI-Display-Taiwan-USB-3.0-2TB-Thin-Card,13320.html

Why are people so amazed at such pedestrian storage space numbers? It's like someone has transported a bunch of old Amiga or Spectrum users through time and dumped them in front of a modern PC.
>> No. 366807 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:14 pm
366807 spacer
>>366804
>>366806
Oh my. Then why aren't they in shops? The article mentioned something about international standards for v3 USBs, has it happened yet?
>> No. 366809 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:15 pm
366809 spacer
>>366801
I'm not exactly hardcore and I've got 3x2TB externals and a shitload of DVD-Rs. I must surely be into double figures by now.
>> No. 366810 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:15 pm
366810 spacer
Remembering that this bloke probably worked a lot with digital content like music and possibly video and that he's going to have a fair bit of cash to spend it would be simple for him to get a few drives for that volume.

http://www.ebuyer.com/319641-seagate-2tb-barracuda-internal-hard-drive-st2000dm001?utm_source=google&utm_medium=products&gclid=CIaq2LblursCFejpwgodjm0AgA

2TB drives are very cheap now. He could afford many or better. Add onto that the other storage formats and I can see him easily racking that up. If you have a large game and music collection you're talking TBs of data right there. Remember it doesn't say in the article it was 27TB of speciality nonce material taken all from his desktop. They will haul in everything related to digital content in one go and take it back to look at it.
>> No. 366811 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:17 pm
366811 spacer
>>366807

The USB versions are very expensive and so few requesting them yet. Low demand and high cost (and also very easy to steal) wouldn't make you think of stocking them. Add to that the rapid depreciation of electronic goods.
>> No. 366813 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:19 pm
366813 spacer
>>366811
I see. Well that's a shame.
>> No. 366816 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:22 pm
366816 spacer
It's just like when the raid a nonce's house and say they have found "thousands of images". Well, this site has thousands of images but none of them CP. Or they say they found "images of children", just like every parent in the world has or the Argos catalogue through the ages will have, when what really matters is the nature of them. You've got to be careful how much you unconciously add to a news report in details that aren't really there, especially if they are leading your mind that way. You've got to be able to think at least a little bit like a lawyer.
>> No. 366817 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:31 pm
366817 spacer
>>366816
Argos full of CP? It all make sense now. NONCE-SENSE.
>> No. 366818 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:32 pm
366818 spacer
>>366817

Argos, innit? It's THEM FECKIN GREEKS AGAIN!
>> No. 366819 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:32 pm
366819 spacer
I used to wank to the women in the lingerie section in the Argo catalogue when I was 13.
>> No. 366821 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:33 pm
366821 spacer
>>366819

What's wrong with that?
>> No. 366823 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:34 pm
366823 spacer
>>366819

Kids these days don't understand how hard it was to get decent wank fodder. They get hardcore fisting streamed to their phone on demand. We had to make do with a medical guide for breast exams in Women's Weekly.

Unless we came across the holiest of holy grails - a bush with a stash of porn.
>> No. 366825 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:41 pm
366825 spacer
>>366823

I was going to post a thread about this with some other stuff for those aged around 40. Should we have a new thread or just carry on here? I want to share porn stash stories and tell of my experience of making them, but am concerned about doing that in a nonce thread.
>> No. 366826 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:43 pm
366826 spacer
>>366825

New thread please as it seems more appropriate as we are talking about children seraching for porn, rather than searching for porn with children as these celebs are.
>> No. 366827 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:45 pm
366827 spacer
>>366786

Won't the screws kick the shit out of him or let another inmate onto his cell to do it for them?
>> No. 366828 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:47 pm
366828 spacer
>>366786
Tell that to Ian Huntley.
>> No. 366829 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:47 pm
366829 spacer
>>366827
Probably not, he's fucking loaded and will be able to afford to pay for all kinds of perks.
>> No. 366830 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 10:52 pm
366830 spacer
>>366827

Nope. That and the prison rape thing is mostly a myth in the UK. The USA is a fucking disgrace so who knows what they are doing these days. Probably work programmes with them working in meth labs or something.
>> No. 366833 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 11:06 pm
366833 spacer
>>366777
The band and management, and no doubt his mum, thought he was a normal sort of nonce into making teenage girl fans wear school uniform and all the other slightly naughty shit that would be odd for a normal man his age but de rigeur for a single bloke in a terrible band that appealed to teenagers.

I'm pretty sure that no-one near him had a clue just how deep and grim the whole de Sade inspired thing went. The women involved got off very lightly I think - the one with the boy especially is a monstrous beast who helped to initiate the abuse. She got the lightest sentence.

>>366826
>we are talking about children seraching for porn

I saw this the other day - http://www.reddit.com/r/NoFap/comments/rwt2h/my_own_personal_porn_downward_spiral/ - intense read.
>> No. 366835 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 11:10 pm
366835 spacer
>>366833
Use English words you soppy twat. Fucking pretentious French-wannabe-be bastard.
>> No. 366836 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 11:11 pm
366836 spacer
>>366833
>he beat off his addiction entirely
>> No. 366837 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 11:15 pm
366837 spacer
>>366833

> into making teenage girl fans wear school uniform and all the other slightly naughty shit

I'll be in my bunk.

>>366836

It's like making someone smoke a dozen packs of fags to put them off for life.
>> No. 366845 Anonymous
18th December 2013
Wednesday 11:43 pm
366845 spacer
>>366835
I couldn't even spell de rigueur properly so wouldn't make a great pseudo-froggy, plus ca change.
>> No. 366850 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 12:04 am
366850 spacer
>>366833

> making teenage girl fans wear school uniform

THE DREAM
>> No. 366851 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 12:19 am
366851 spacer
>>366781
Read the whole thing, the beginning bit was the worst, really graphic and showed that Watkins was an utter, utter cunt. Although, you didn't need to tell me that - I hated the ponce well before his noncing was unravelled.
>> No. 366853 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 12:25 am
366853 spacer
>>366851
An utter utter cunt. Particularly when you consider that according to one of these girls (now thankfully defunct) Twitter stream that one of these children might have been his.
>> No. 366854 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 12:29 am
366854 spacer
>>366781
The infant boy got almost bum-raped, but he ended up getting his dick sucked by his mother, and he fisted his mother, while Watkins masturbated him.

Was the baby crying? I thought the cry of a baby would put people off.
>> No. 366855 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 12:37 am
366855 spacer
>>366854

And the smell
>> No. 366856 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 12:44 am
366856 spacer
>>366854

Jesus Christ. That is like the kind of thing someone might say as an "Aristocrats" joke. Not something you expect to hear about for real.
>> No. 366857 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 12:44 am
366857 spacer

9f5ce73e26e12cd0304a873a62d13760.jpg
366857366857366857
>>366854
>> No. 366859 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 12:47 am
366859 spacer
>>366781
Sigh. I should not have read that. Things like this force me over the edge, and I start contemplating whether we should bring back the death penalty.
>> No. 366860 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 12:49 am
366860 spacer
>>366857
Is this the bitch? Fucking bitch. Lads, I am joining the paedomania. Fuck this. These cunts deserve worse than the little sentences they got. The mothers especially. Fucking bitches.
>> No. 366861 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 12:52 am
366861 spacer
I've had a sobering thought.

Do you think this would have come to light if savillegate hadn't happened?
>> No. 366862 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 12:57 am
366862 spacer
>>366861
At some point in the future, after he fucked a lot of toddlers and their mothers, yes.
>> No. 366864 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 12:59 am
366864 spacer
>>366859
Oral sex with dogs is a little out of left field I'll grant you, but I think you're overreacting.
>> No. 366865 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:02 am
366865 spacer

Yewtree.jpg
366865366865366865
>>366861

This case is completely unrelated to yewtree, it would have surfaced regardless
>> No. 366866 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:03 am
366866 spacer
>Your infant was only 10 months old.
>“Come down this weekend and we can
fuck him up again “You text back saying “tell me if you want to get your dick
in our boy”

I don't know what to say anymore. :(
>> No. 366867 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:05 am
366867 spacer
>>366854

It was probably too spaced out on crystal meth.
>> No. 366868 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:07 am
366868 spacer
I am amazed the drugs didn't kill the baby. I don't think you can just look up an easy reference guide for dosages for 10 month old babies and whatnot. Good chance that alone has done some damage internally. The man has probably left a huge trail of misery and lifelong problems in his wake.
>> No. 366869 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:09 am
366869 spacer
>>366860
There is a photo of her where the IW tattoo on her chest is very clearly visible, and a photo she took of her baby and Ian cuddling, and her making the baby stare at a photo of the band. The other woman sentenced seems more obviously exploited by Watkins, and more obviously mentally unwell. Picture of her and her kid is still up on instagram.

Very obvious that Ian Watkins was sexually abused in most horrendous ways at a young age by members of his family, as that mixed up yet well intentioned ex of his has pointed out in public on twitter and has tried to hint in her interviews to the MSM.

And yes, the only possible way to follow those sentencing remarks would be: "And we call it....The Aristocrats!"
>> No. 366870 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:10 am
366870 spacer
>>366868
>>The man has probably left a huge trail of misery and lifelong problems in his wake.

Thanks for clearing that up for us Freud.

Will we have a nice .gs crimbo thread or will noncerama ruin it all?
>> No. 366871 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:11 am
366871 spacer
>Watkins said “that’s all she will know... a life of filth”

At that point it's time to get the shotgun out. Cheap and sure to wrap up that problem for good.
>> No. 366872 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:18 am
366872 spacer
>>366869
Oh please. That's a cop-out. [i]He was abused, that's why he tried to stick his dick in an infant's mouth while the mother watched.[i] No. He is just an evil cunt, and >>366871 is right. He doesn't deserve to breathe our air.
>> No. 366874 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:20 am
366874 spacer
The one thing I don't get is - why? I don't understand it. I don't see how it could be someone wanting to "scratch an itch" or feeling horny or something. Was he so oblivious to what was going on? How far he had sunk?
>> No. 366875 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:23 am
366875 spacer
>>366873

Not viewing that in case it came from some sick fuck 4channer.
>> No. 366876 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:25 am
366876 spacer
>>366874
Maybe it is the drugs, but I have been told drugs are great by a lad in /pol/. So... I'm not sure.
>> No. 366877 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:25 am
366877 spacer
>>366874
I think unless you've already had a few years of getting noshed off by willing barely-legal groupies who'll let you do all manner of filthy things to them, and then developed a healthy methamphetamine and crack habit supported by a rock star's wages, you can probably never understand.
>> No. 366878 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:25 am
366878 spacer
>>366872
I'd be ready to charge an electric for this cunt myself, but from the great deal of material I have unfortunately read about this case since it broke in December 2012 I am pretty sure he was abused in extreme ways by members of his family while under the age of ten. Not sure why this would make me a 'cop-out', I'm just trying to understand how people might end up like this.
>> No. 366879 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:28 am
366879 spacer
>>366878
A long time ago, in this thread, I said that people who get abused, will end up becoming abusers themselves. I was laughed out of the thread. Now, I am feeling smug.
>> No. 366880 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:28 am
366880 spacer
I couldn't even read all that court document. It was too much. I can't imagine what it must be like for the jury, court, etc. that had to deal with it or view that material. I'd probably end up crying and vomiting.
>> No. 366881 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:29 am
366881 spacer
>>366878
Is...Is anyone else seeing that?
>> No. 366882 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:30 am
366882 spacer
>>366881

Affirmative
>> No. 366883 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:31 am
366883 spacer

wank chair.jpg
366883366883366883
>>366881

This?
>> No. 366884 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:32 am
366884 spacer
>>366880
Toughen up, you little bitch. What are you? A woman?
>> No. 366885 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:32 am
366885 spacer
>>366883
I can already imagine the smell. Fuck you.
>> No. 366886 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:33 am
366886 spacer
>>366881

I think it's just you. You got anything to confess? Something on your mind? A bit of overdue cleaning causing guilty thoughts?
>> No. 366887 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:34 am
366887 spacer
>>366880
>that had to deal with it or view that material
They didn't, what with them all pleading guilty.
>> No. 366888 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:35 am
366888 spacer
>>366885

Rich, earthy, musky and sexy! Imagine if you had your lips pressed right onto it...your lips parting as you slide your face up and across from the edge, your nose tickled by the fabric and texture as you unhale and then, just when your head is swimming, you flick your tongue out and savour the flavour mixing with the scents and the rough texture of the cloth.

Heaven.
>> No. 366889 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:36 am
366889 spacer
>>366887

Wouldn't someone need to review it to prosecute them?
>> No. 366890 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:36 am
366890 spacer
>>366888
Jesus. Why didn't I stop reading? My God.
>> No. 366892 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:38 am
366892 spacer
>>366879
It's not a universal truth. Some of us who were sexually abused as children really try our best not to repeat the cycle. I was photographed and made to do things aged 5-8 while drugged by outwardly respectable men (the youngest freemasons in town) and their acquiescent and amoral wives: I've grown up morbid as fuck, with sex addiction problems, mental health issues and the blackest of humour but I'm damned if I'll fuck any kids myself. Fuck Ian Watkins.
>> No. 366893 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:44 am
366893 spacer

Fearne.jpg
366893366893366893
I wonder if poor old Fearne Cotton got her face pissed on as well?
>> No. 366894 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 1:50 am
366894 spacer
>>366893

Too old.
>> No. 366896 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 2:00 am
366896 spacer
>>366893
I would do vanilla-naughty things to her.
>> No. 366897 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 2:21 am
366897 spacer
>>366896

Would you get her to dress up?
>> No. 366899 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 2:34 am
366899 spacer
>>366897
No, just vanilla things. Kissing lightly at first—lips, neck, a bit further down—some heavy petting, and just sex. I would then have a pillow talk with her, while cuddling and caressing her, then we would fall asleep, in each other's arms. I would then wake-up to the smell of a full English breakfast.

I would eat my breakfast with her, while having a light-hearted and humorous conversation about why I can't eat pork. We would head off to take a shower together. There would be some more caressing and heavy petting. Maybe even sex. We would clean up, and I would put on my best suit. She will be taking her time to dress up, obviously. I will tell her to join me outside after she is done. I will leave the building, and walk towards my car. It won't unlock... After realising that it isn't my car, I will pull out a gun from my pocket, put it in my mouth, and with tears streaming down my face, I will pull the trigger.
>> No. 366901 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 3:09 am
366901 spacer
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/356497/Mega-lolz-Ian-Watkins-made-light-of-his-horrific-crimes-just-days-after-pleading-guilty

>The message I want to send out to other paedophiles is don't think your safe

Don't we have a Daily Star lad here? Can you somehow confront this Jaymi McCann 'journalist' about writing that? The you're/your thing boils my piss inordinately.
>> No. 366908 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 9:30 am
366908 spacer
>>366899

Glad to see we still have decent writers here. I look forward to drunkenly reading some sort of xmas story thread on boxing day involving racism, being banned from the British Museum and Danny Dyer.
>> No. 366909 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 9:41 am
366909 spacer
>>366908
I would ban oxygen from Danny Dyer, if I could.
>> No. 366910 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 10:48 am
366910 spacer
>>366909

Well you can't, but you could start some sort of thread in /iq/.
>> No. 366915 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 7:05 pm
366915 spacer
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-25447856
>> No. 366916 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 7:34 pm
366916 spacer
>>366910

You could if you wrap your hands around his neck.
>> No. 366917 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 7:37 pm
366917 spacer
>>366916

Wouldn't that be an embargo rather than a ban?
>> No. 366918 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 7:53 pm
366918 spacer
>>366917

Only way to find out is to try.
>> No. 366919 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 10:01 pm
366919 spacer

MEGALOLZ.png
366919366919366919

>> No. 366920 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 10:16 pm
366920 spacer
>>366919

Source?
>> No. 366921 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 10:25 pm
366921 spacer

_71358821_ianwatkins.jpg
366921366921366921
>>366920
>> No. 366924 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 11:20 pm
366924 spacer
LOL he tried to to fuck a baby in the ass. I still can't believe it.
>> No. 366925 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 11:43 pm
366925 spacer
>>366880
They watched seized footage evidence. Think about that for a minute. Bloody hell.
>> No. 366926 Anonymous
19th December 2013
Thursday 11:56 pm
366926 spacer
>>366925

Thankfully the jury were spared the footage as he pleaded guilty.

And I suppose it's a little bit of comfort that the police and prosecution have officers specially trained to be able to cope with disturbing material of this sort.
>> No. 366927 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 12:03 am
366927 spacer
>>366926
No amount of training will spare you from witnessing a grown man attempt to force his erect penis into a wailing infant, repeatedly and often in vain.
>> No. 366928 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 12:04 am
366928 spacer
>>366926
How can you be specially trained? How do you leave a room like that and face the normality of life - it basically scars you to the core.
>> No. 366929 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 12:16 am
366929 spacer
>>366924

IT'S AWWWWWWIGHT

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 366936 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 2:28 am
366936 spacer
>>366928
It won't scar you; it will just make you callus and jaded. Maybe if one is a pussy, one will suffer from some sort of PTSD.
>> No. 366938 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 2:42 am
366938 spacer
>>36693
> It won't scar you; it will just make you callus and jaded.

The latter is often the result of the former.
>> No. 366939 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 2:54 am
366939 spacer
>>366936
>Maybe if one is a pussy, one will suffer from some sort of PTSD.

Good Christ you need to shut up, you child.
>> No. 366942 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 3:24 am
366942 spacer
>>366938
Not really. It is the result of not being able to rationalise something, and coming to the conclusion that people are evil and cunts.

>>366939
Go to your hug-box in /emo/ and leave me in peace.
>> No. 366943 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 3:51 am
366943 spacer
>>366942

I suppose that depends on what you consider emotional scarring. Being unable to rationalise something disturbing and struggling with it to the point where you lose faith in people fits my definition well enough. Consider how debilitating it really is to write humanity off like that, vulnerability to clinical depression or addiction, inability to trust or to form/maintain relationships, etc. It would interrupt your life in a way I'd consider scarring.

Not even sure what to say about the PTSD thing. Do you think people who suffer from it are just soft somehow?
>> No. 366944 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 4:19 am
366944 spacer
>>366943
Perhaps you are right. Although saying emotionally scarred, makes it seem like something that stops you from just living your life, as you have explained. I don't think that is true. You can still have a life, and live it while being jaded and callus thanks to what you might have experienced.

People with PTSD just don't have a coping mechanism, I believe. If you can't rationalise it and come to terms with it, you will break. So people with those mechanism, who end-up becoming cold, hard, callus and jaded individuals, are better than them.
>> No. 366945 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 5:45 am
366945 spacer
>>366944
There are some experiences, maybe, for which PTSD and becoming a bit of a wreck are perhaps the most understandable and human reactions, and for which carrying on as a cold, hard, *callous* and jaded person would be indicative of some degree of psychopathy and possible propensity to become a future victimiser. I'm thinking now of a good friend who is an Iraq war veteran and an unemployable PTSD riddled mess yet has retained his humanity and basic kindness, and some of his former colleagues who are now working in private security services very probably doing some horrible things in murky and lawless corners of the globe.
>> No. 366946 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 6:49 am
366946 spacer
>babyshit.gif

Anyone seen this?
>> No. 366950 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 8:02 am
366950 spacer
>>366946
Oh yeah, had forgotten about that.
At least I know I'm not into pedoscat.
>> No. 366960 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 3:06 pm
366960 spacer
>>366944

And what examples of extreme trauma have you suffered that is so beyond the norm that you can make such judgements?
>> No. 366961 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 3:08 pm
366961 spacer
>>366946

Was that the legendary one posted on 4chan yonks ago? Even the residents there thought the poster was utterly insane.
>> No. 366964 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 5:23 pm
366964 spacer
http://www.youtube.com/v/RleE--HDBiU

I don't normally like Kunt songs when they're posted, but I enjoyed this.
>> No. 366967 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 5:42 pm
366967 spacer
>>366964
Ahh Kunt. Always reliable.
>> No. 366971 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 6:02 pm
366971 spacer
>>366960
NATO bombs and warlords recruiting child soldiers high on drugs.
>> No. 366981 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 9:31 pm
366981 spacer
>>366964

If H from Steps wanted to fuck a kid then this is the ideal time for it. If anyone came forward to make a complaint the authorities and public would assume it was the other bloke wot done it.
>> No. 366982 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 9:45 pm
366982 spacer
>>366981
Ingenious - how can we advise him?
>> No. 366983 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 9:54 pm
366983 spacer
>>366982
It's probably already gone through his mind, the dirty nonce.
>> No. 366984 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 10:01 pm
366984 spacer
>>366982

Perhaps a twitter message or a secret envelope passed to him at the local paedo ring monthly meeting.
>> No. 366989 Anonymous
20th December 2013
Friday 11:01 pm
366989 spacer
>>366984
2nd Tuesday of every month!
>> No. 366997 Anonymous
21st December 2013
Saturday 12:04 am
366997 spacer
>>366983

He's a bummer that's pretty much the same thing
>> No. 367340 Anonymous
24th December 2013
Tuesday 2:31 am
367340 spacer
they won't leave him alone, all he wanted was some jailbait fun.
>> No. 367343 Anonymous
24th December 2013
Tuesday 2:50 am
367343 spacer
>>367340
>aged seven or eight

Jesus Christ, when will this thread die.
>> No. 367344 Anonymous
24th December 2013
Tuesday 4:14 am
367344 spacer
>>367343
NEVAH FORGET
>> No. 367766 Anonymous
29th December 2013
Sunday 12:13 am
367766 spacer
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/12/28/ian-watkins-lostprophets-_n_4511162.html?icid=maing-grid7|uk|dl4|sec3_lnk1%26pLid%3D233121

You couldn't make it up.
>> No. 367767 Anonymous
29th December 2013
Sunday 12:27 am
367767 spacer
>>367766

Set up twitter account @NottheIanwatkinsinprison.
Arrange meeting in a park.
Shoot anyone over 16 that looks angry.
Profit.
>> No. 367768 Anonymous
29th December 2013
Sunday 12:48 am
367768 spacer

dgdag.jpg
367768367768367768
>>367766
Fantastic
>> No. 367769 Anonymous
29th December 2013
Sunday 12:50 am
367769 spacer
>>367766

The teenlad in the twitter grab looke how I image ARE teenlad to look.
>> No. 367771 Anonymous
29th December 2013
Sunday 12:58 am
367771 spacer
>>367769
That's a lass, mate.
>> No. 367772 Anonymous
29th December 2013
Sunday 1:11 am
367772 spacer
>>367771

A lass called Robert Pearman? Ok.
>> No. 367773 Anonymous
29th December 2013
Sunday 1:18 am
367773 spacer
>>367768

Mega lulz
>> No. 367774 Anonymous
29th December 2013
Sunday 2:06 am
367774 spacer
>>367768 Is it irrational to hate these types of angry mobs more than the actual nonces/rapists/murderers? They really are awful.

http://www.youtube.com/v/AXzixz5ysxc
>> No. 367775 Anonymous
29th December 2013
Sunday 2:17 am
367775 spacer

NBNBNBNBNB.jpg
367775367775367775
>>367768

Better. Distribute wantonly.
>> No. 367776 Anonymous
29th December 2013
Sunday 2:48 am
367776 spacer
>>367775
Holy shit, it's mindboggling how stupid some people can be.

https://twitter.com/steviejane_/status/372861876318646273/photo/1
>> No. 367777 Anonymous
29th December 2013
Sunday 2:49 am
367777 spacer
>>367774

>They really are awful.

You're awful.. But I like you.

http://www.youtube.com/v/dJmg-879j5o
>> No. 367778 Anonymous
29th December 2013
Sunday 3:09 am
367778 spacer

File
removed
>>367776

I know. She'll have her address somewhere. Anyone hae a 192 login?
>> No. 367779 Anonymous
29th December 2013
Sunday 3:48 am
367779 spacer
Perhaps I've missed something, but is no one in this thread surprised that Rolf Harris is actually facing charges?
>> No. 367780 Anonymous
29th December 2013
Sunday 3:51 am
367780 spacer
>>367779
Certainly not after four and a half months, no.
>> No. 367827 Anonymous
30th December 2013
Monday 12:18 am
367827 spacer
>>367779

I was shocked. He looks like such a nice man. He's not not Savile who was so creepy he made my skin crawl, before it even came out he was a nonce.
>> No. 367829 Anonymous
30th December 2013
Monday 12:22 am
367829 spacer
>>367827

I think anyone growing up with him as a kindly grandfather type figure on TV or as a cheerful, lively and amusing artist and performer in his earlier career would all have been shocked at the initial accusation. The conviction will seal the deal, but it's not even one people had suspicions about. Jimm Saville was a suspected nonce and freak for a long time and it had leaked out quite far before the top blew on this (which of course makes us all wonder why paedo 'auntie' Beeb did and said nothing along with the rest). Rolf had no such rumours and always seemed nice, charming and caring (some might remember his Animal Hospital stint).
>> No. 367830 Anonymous
30th December 2013
Monday 12:24 am
367830 spacer
>>367829
The entire Animal hospital theme just played itself in my head.
>> No. 367833 Anonymous
30th December 2013
Monday 12:27 am
367833 spacer
>>367827

>He's not not Savile

I was trying to say "not like Savile" but Freudian-slipped a double negative. Hmmmn.
>> No. 367834 Anonymous
30th December 2013
Monday 12:27 am
367834 spacer
>>367830

Glad I could be of help. Now just imagine for the entire theme playing it is Rolf just sobbing uncontrollably on camera, tears rolling down his cheek and barely able to catch his breath. As the intro theme fades at the end the camera pans back and the lights dim. All there is in sight is Rolf in a weak spotlight, blackness and the end of a noose in front of him. He doesn't stop sobbing. The camera goes to black.
>> No. 367848 Anonymous
30th December 2013
Monday 1:59 am
367848 spacer
>>367830
I used to have it as a ringtone.
>> No. 369384 Anonymous
15th January 2014
Wednesday 12:46 pm
369384 Cock-blocking Chuckle Brother
Metro1.jpg
369384369384369384
>DJ Dave Lee Travis was disturbed while molesting a young woman backstage at a panto by the sound of a Chuckle Brother approaching.

I hope he was lumbering past, carrying a big plank and saying "to me".
>> No. 369389 Anonymous
15th January 2014
Wednesday 1:15 pm
369389 spacer
>>369384
The idea that a Chuckle Brother would foil a nonce. This just gets funnier.
>> No. 369407 Anonymous
15th January 2014
Wednesday 2:19 pm
369407 spacer
>>369384
Oh my that really is a fantastic headline. We truly are living in a fucking parody universe.
>> No. 369413 Anonymous
15th January 2014
Wednesday 2:57 pm
369413 spacer
>>369384
I think I've seen this episode.
>> No. 369414 Anonymous
15th January 2014
Wednesday 3:50 pm
369414 spacer
>>369384
This is the single greatest thing ever.
>> No. 369415 Anonymous
15th January 2014
Wednesday 3:54 pm
369415 spacer
>>369384

The Chuckle Brothers are known as proper pervs too. Irony.
>> No. 369419 Anonymous
15th January 2014
Wednesday 4:08 pm
369419 spacer

nonce vision.jpg
369419369419369419
>>369384

And to think some people want this thread to die!
>> No. 369420 Anonymous
15th January 2014
Wednesday 4:10 pm
369420 spacer
>>369415

No they are not. Sure they look lik nonces and one of the had some incident in a brothel but that is all.
>> No. 369426 Anonymous
15th January 2014
Wednesday 5:06 pm
369426 spacer
>>369384
That might just be newspaper headline of the year.
>> No. 369430 Anonymous
15th January 2014
Wednesday 6:02 pm
369430 spacer
>>369419
I can imagine them spitroasting some poor bird. With Mr No Slacking as the pimp.

TO ME, TO YOU!
>> No. 369479 Anonymous
15th January 2014
Wednesday 9:12 pm
369479 spacer
So, lads, who do you reckon is going to be the first one in the nonce wing, DLT, Rolf or Ken Barlow?
>> No. 369491 Anonymous
15th January 2014
Wednesday 10:21 pm
369491 spacer
>>369479

They're all innocent if you ask me
>> No. 369498 Anonymous
15th January 2014
Wednesday 11:08 pm
369498 spacer
The Chuckle Brothers were shagging around and groping birds and involved with affairs, etc. Randy little cunts.
>> No. 369500 Anonymous
16th January 2014
Thursday 12:10 am
369500 spacer
>>369498
Yeah but they kept it on the relatively straight & narrow.
>> No. 369501 Anonymous
16th January 2014
Thursday 12:11 am
369501 spacer
>>369500

If you mean at least they didn't break the law, then you are right enough. They didn't shag any kiddies (that we know of so far...).
>> No. 369505 Anonymous
16th January 2014
Thursday 1:18 am
369505 spacer
>>369479
DLT looks like a shoo-in, but so far little reports of any noncing or raping, just a regular handy-andy sex offender. 3 years.

Ken Barlow allegations are all in the late sixties, early seventies. Proving them is going to be difficult but sounds plausible. 2 years.

Rolf is the wild card, could go either way. Acquitted or 10 years is my bid.
>> No. 369506 Anonymous
16th January 2014
Thursday 1:57 am
369506 spacer
Rolf is obviously going to be the one placed inside the wicker man.
>> No. 369508 Anonymous
16th January 2014
Thursday 2:02 am
369508 spacer
>>369506
No, that's DLT and the corrie bloke. Rolf will probably get a lenient sentence.
>> No. 369509 Anonymous
16th January 2014
Thursday 2:12 am
369509 spacer
>>369508

Crocodile tears in Animal Hospital and fondling kids on his cartoon club won't save him fron the noose. They should string him up like Gary Glitter.
>> No. 369510 Anonymous
16th January 2014
Thursday 2:22 am
369510 spacer
>>369509

Innocent until trial by media, that's how it goes right?
>> No. 369511 Anonymous
16th January 2014
Thursday 2:24 am
369511 spacer
>>369510

Hang them once fingered, I say.
>> No. 369512 Anonymous
16th January 2014
Thursday 2:30 am
369512 spacer
>>369511

>Hang them once fingered, I say.

If only ARE Jim'll had thought of that.
>> No. 369513 Anonymous
16th January 2014
Thursday 2:43 am
369513 spacer
I follow the Paedofinder General's methods and way of life.
>> No. 369514 Anonymous
16th January 2014
Thursday 10:59 am
369514 spacer
Even the Guardian is full of nonce stories today. One of them worthy of Simon in his heyday, and the other I don't remember.
>> No. 369528 Anonymous
16th January 2014
Thursday 1:57 pm
369528 spacer
>>369514
Nonce stories? More like non-stories, right?
>> No. 369529 Anonymous
16th January 2014
Thursday 2:17 pm
369529 spacer
http://www.youtube.com/v/9yJKb009aD4

He dunt nonce in the Woolpaaack
>> No. 369568 Anonymous
16th January 2014
Thursday 8:24 pm
369568 spacer
How long until we see ' Celebrity Nonce Wing' on Channel 5?
>> No. 369628 Anonymous
17th January 2014
Friday 4:40 am
369628 spacer
>>369568

You are just fishing for someone to say it would be better suited to the BBC aren't you?
>> No. 369642 Anonymous
17th January 2014
Friday 12:15 pm
369642 spacer

img135.jpg
369642369642369642
>>369384

The Metro today. I think they're having fun with these headlines.
>> No. 369644 Anonymous
17th January 2014
Friday 1:06 pm
369644 spacer
>>369642

At a glance "Showaddywaddy" looks like the name of a Welsh town.
>> No. 369686 Anonymous
17th January 2014
Friday 6:26 pm
369686 spacer
These nonces are really stupid. If I were a prolific nonce, who nonced up and the down the country for decades, I would leave the country at the first sign of the public getting wise to my nonce-activities.

Why didn't these silly nonces leave? They had enough time since OpYewTree.
>> No. 369692 Anonymous
17th January 2014
Friday 6:50 pm
369692 spacer
>>369686
These aren't actual, prolific, professional nonces like that Lostprophets bloke and Jim'll Savile. These are just people who felt up some teenagers here and there. They probably either didn't consider them crimes, or didn't think they'd face justice, or didn't think it worth giving up their lives of fame and fortune in the UK for such offences.
>> No. 369699 Anonymous
17th January 2014
Friday 7:27 pm
369699 spacer

glitter.jpg
369699369699369699
So, first there was Jim'll, who did that thing for BR. Then there was Glitter, who did picrelated for BR. I think a pattern might be emerging there. Now I've found this:

http://www.youtube.com/v/_LFXCzUDGh4

You'd have thought the name was already a dead giveaway.
>> No. 369706 Anonymous
17th January 2014
Friday 9:09 pm
369706 spacer
>>369699

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxZ5AKDvyfU
>> No. 369748 Anonymous
18th January 2014
Saturday 2:43 am
369748 spacer
>>369529
I started getting worried about 10 seconds into that video, as I was told the first sign of a stroke is that spoken word because unintelligible.
>> No. 369814 Anonymous
18th January 2014
Saturday 5:59 pm
369814 spacer
>>369748

That's just what northern men sound like.
>> No. 369855 Anonymous
18th January 2014
Saturday 11:50 pm
369855 spacer
I heard inside news. This Jimmy Savile thing is far deeper and far worse than we could have possibly imagined. It involves missing children. Should come out in the next week or so.
>> No. 369857 Anonymous
18th January 2014
Saturday 11:58 pm
369857 spacer
>>369855

Any more details, Yewtreelad?
>> No. 369859 Anonymous
18th January 2014
Saturday 11:59 pm
369859 spacer
>>369855

There's long been word of secret paedo sex rings with the elites in Europe. I'd love to see this operation crack into that. Just imagine the panic with them as they scatter from the light.
>> No. 369861 Anonymous
19th January 2014
Sunday 12:06 am
369861 spacer
>>369857
Mr Savile may have been into dead things. And no I am not joking.
>> No. 369862 Anonymous
19th January 2014
Sunday 12:14 am
369862 spacer
>>Mr Savile may have been into dead things.

No shit, Poirot.
>> No. 369866 Anonymous
19th January 2014
Sunday 12:40 am
369866 spacer
>>369861
Oh Sir Sir Saville, wil thy hijinks never cease to be revelead / made up?
>> No. 369868 Anonymous
19th January 2014
Sunday 12:49 am
369868 spacer
>>369866

Jim'll invented the Calippo so he could get thrills watching girls eating them after school.
>> No. 369883 Anonymous
19th January 2014
Sunday 2:18 am
369883 spacer
the ride never ends
>> No. 369890 Anonymous
19th January 2014
Sunday 3:20 am
369890 spacer
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jan/18/jimmy-savile-abused-1000-victims-bbc

At this point I suspect we will soon see a statement from the Queen which allows his body to dug up in order to be hung drawn and quartered.
>> No. 369893 Anonymous
19th January 2014
Sunday 3:34 am
369893 spacer
>>369868

It's the only reason I stock them in my van.
>> No. 370328 Anonymous
23rd January 2014
Thursday 8:21 pm
370328 spacer
Ian Watkins is appealing against the length of his sentence, I guess he's doing it for the 'mega lolz'.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-25867257
>> No. 370333 Anonymous
23rd January 2014
Thursday 9:05 pm
370333 spacer
>>370328

He hasn't really got much left to lose, it's worth a go I spose
>> No. 370345 Anonymous
24th January 2014
Friday 12:19 am
370345 spacer
>>370328
Next he'll be rioting in prison. STANDING ON THE ROOFTOP EVERYONE SCREAM YOUR HEARRRRT OUUUT.
>> No. 370348 Anonymous
24th January 2014
Friday 1:58 am
370348 spacer
I've seen people sometimes get a worse sentence when they appeal. It might happen this time and then we'll see the "mega lolz" for real.

Was that tattoo ever confirmed as being real?
>> No. 370361 Anonymous
24th January 2014
Friday 7:31 am
370361 spacer
>>370348
I'm not aware of that having happened without an "unduly lenient" application being made by the AG.
>> No. 370624 Anonymous
26th January 2014
Sunday 10:02 pm
370624 spacer

article-2546254-1AF7876A00000578-423_634x633.jpg
370624370624370624
Even Gaddafi was at it.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2545819/Uncovered-The-macabre-sex-chamber-Libyas-Colonel-Gaddafi-raped-girls-boys-young-14.html
>> No. 370626 Anonymous
26th January 2014
Sunday 10:03 pm
370626 spacer

article-2545819-1AF8BC4700000578-840_636x358.jpg
370626370626370626
Whoops. Meant to use this.
>> No. 370632 Anonymous
26th January 2014
Sunday 10:12 pm
370632 spacer
>>370624
I feel like a right idiot for not assuming Gadaffi was a kiddy fiddler. Someone that fucked up was bound to have been noncing kids.
>> No. 370634 Anonymous
26th January 2014
Sunday 10:22 pm
370634 spacer
GLAMOUR MODEL APPEARS IN MUSIC VIDEO SHOCKER

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2545543/Celebrity-Big-Brother-star-Casey-Batchelor-backing-dancing-Lostprophets-music-video-alongside-paedophile-Ian-Watkins.html
>> No. 370637 Anonymous
26th January 2014
Sunday 10:42 pm
370637 spacer
>>370634
IRREDEEMABLE DAILY MAIL CLICKBAIT POSTED ON BRITFAGS SHOCKER
>> No. 370640 Anonymous
26th January 2014
Sunday 10:53 pm
370640 spacer
>>370637
Is it really clickbait?
>> No. 370643 Anonymous
26th January 2014
Sunday 11:42 pm
370643 spacer
>>370640
Yes.
>> No. 370666 Anonymous
27th January 2014
Monday 8:39 am
370666 spacer
>>370634
Will he now forever be referenced as nothing but 'paedophile Ian Watkins'? His wiki page should be renamed, too, I reckon.
>> No. 370680 Anonymous
27th January 2014
Monday 12:41 pm
370680 spacer
>>370666

On here he will always be remembered as ARE PURPZ.
>> No. 370698 Anonymous
27th January 2014
Monday 3:52 pm
370698 spacer
>>370666
Thing is, I don't actually believe he's a paedophile. Not everyone who sexually abuses children is a paedophile, just like, I dunno, not everyone who drinks and drives is an alcoholic.
>> No. 370708 Anonymous
27th January 2014
Monday 5:17 pm
370708 spacer

Fred Talbot-1499709[1].jpg
370708370708370708
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25917895
>> No. 370710 Anonymous
27th January 2014
Monday 5:57 pm
370710 spacer
>>370698
>Thing is, I don't actually believe he's a paedophile. Not everyone who sexually abuses children is a paedophile,

Care to qualify that at all?
>> No. 370711 Anonymous
27th January 2014
Monday 5:58 pm
370711 spacer
>>370708
THE RIDE NEVER ENDS, EVER.
>> No. 370718 Anonymous
27th January 2014
Monday 6:15 pm
370718 spacer
>>370710

Do a bit of research, it's a fairly well-understood fact.

Some people who sexually abuse children are preferential paedophiles who are solely or primarily attracted to children, but others are just opportunists or psychologically-motivated sexual predators. The fact that the victim is a child is often merely incidental to the offender, not the motivation for their offending.

Think about men who have sex with men in prison. Some are gay, but others are just taking whatever they can get - they wouldn't have sex with men on the outside and are only engaging in that behaviour as a result of circumstances.

The argument in this case is that Watkins wasn't particularly interested in children, but in the taboo. He was primarily gratified by the submission of the mothers, by the fact that they were doing something appalling for his pleasure, by the fact that he was doing something deeply shocking. He dabbled in pretty much everything, the more sordid and degrading the better. Allegedly he prostituted himself out for the thrill of being used by strange men, which is hardly typical nonce behaviour.
>> No. 370736 Anonymous
27th January 2014
Monday 7:56 pm
370736 spacer

n-BILL-ROACHE-large570.jpg
370736370736370736
NOT GUILTY!

On one count.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/27/bill-roache-cleared-one-sex-charge_n_4674152.html?ncid=webmail1
>> No. 370738 Anonymous
27th January 2014
Monday 8:08 pm
370738 spacer
>>370718
Is it worse to be a nonce or to be degenerate enough that you'd fuck a child? I never know which one is meant to be worse when people make this distinction. Either way they're a kiddie fiddler and they should be kept away from society for the rest of their lives because you cannot rehabilitate kiddie fiddlers.
>> No. 370739 Anonymous
27th January 2014
Monday 8:13 pm
370739 spacer

bronson2.jpg
370739370739370739
'ello ello lads, wots goin on in this thread?
>> No. 370740 Anonymous
27th January 2014
Monday 8:14 pm
370740 spacer
>>370739
Allo Nonceon.
>> No. 370741 Anonymous
27th January 2014
Monday 8:15 pm
370741 spacer
>>370718

I dunno, I think he really does have a thing for babies. Nepiophilia, I think it's called.
>> No. 370742 Anonymous
27th January 2014
Monday 8:15 pm
370742 spacer

lostprophets29n-2-web.jpg
370742370742370742
>>370741

Forgot pic.
>> No. 370746 Anonymous
27th January 2014
Monday 10:17 pm
370746 spacer
>>370741
>I think he really does have a thing for babies
Care to qualify that at all?

>>370738
You sound like you really know what you're talking about.
>> No. 371166 Anonymous
3rd February 2014
Monday 7:50 pm
371166 spacer
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26019626

>Chuckle Brothers giving character statements
This whole thing just gets weirder and weirder.
>> No. 371167 Anonymous
3rd February 2014
Monday 7:55 pm
371167 spacer
>>371166
Bazza looks like he's had part of his left ear bitten off.
>> No. 371168 Anonymous
3rd February 2014
Monday 8:29 pm
371168 spacer

Alan-Davies_1890114c.jpg
371168371168371168
>>371167

I couldn't possibly comment on that
>> No. 371169 Anonymous
3rd February 2014
Monday 8:39 pm
371169 spacer

tpzUb6k9dQ7.jpg
371169371169371169
I don't fucking believe it, just heard on the news that Barry Scott has been arrested in relation to Operating Yewtree.

My world is falling apart.
>> No. 371170 Anonymous
3rd February 2014
Monday 8:43 pm
371170 spacer
>>371169
Ignoring that Barry Scott is a character and not a real person, a cursory google shows that Neil Burgess has not been arrested.
>> No. 371171 Anonymous
3rd February 2014
Monday 8:43 pm
371171 spacer
>>371169
BANG! And the DNA Evidence is gone.
>> No. 371203 Anonymous
4th February 2014
Tuesday 6:53 pm
371203 spacer
>>371171

Well played!
>> No. 371204 Anonymous
4th February 2014
Tuesday 6:58 pm
371204 spacer
Apaprently Yewtree are looking at another big recording artist and judging by some of the veiled comments on Digital Spy forums it is rumoured to be....

Cliff Richard
>> No. 371206 Anonymous
4th February 2014
Tuesday 7:11 pm
371206 spacer
>>371170

>Ignoring that Barry Scott is a character and not a real person

World officially crumbled.

Thanks a lot.
>> No. 371235 Anonymous
5th February 2014
Wednesday 11:24 am
371235 spacer

elm-lodge-guest-house.jpg
371235371235371235
>>371204

Considering his name turned up on the Elm Lodge Guest House list, I'm not surprised
>> No. 371261 Anonymous
5th February 2014
Wednesday 5:10 pm
371261 spacer
>>371235
Being intrigued by that image, I went full internet detective mode and found this http://postimg.org/gallery/7pkkeq9g/
Anyone got any information about who the person holding the photocopies is? Are those really legitimate notes from a police investigation.
>> No. 371262 Anonymous
5th February 2014
Wednesday 5:12 pm
371262 spacer
>>371261
Looks like Dryden Mitchell.
>> No. 371263 Anonymous
5th February 2014
Wednesday 5:30 pm
371263 spacer

Photo_on_2012_12_21_at_14_37_5[1].jpg
371263371263371263
>>371261
>dial-a-child
>kidnap one of the street if none in stock

i shouldn't laugh.
>> No. 371264 Anonymous
5th February 2014
Wednesday 5:39 pm
371264 spacer
>>371263
Sounds like something from Brasseye.
>> No. 371272 Anonymous
5th February 2014
Wednesday 8:10 pm
371272 spacer
>>371235

Uploaded on 16 Apr 2013

http://www.youtube.com/v/NAqWh1Lz8TE
>> No. 371273 Anonymous
5th February 2014
Wednesday 8:26 pm
371273 spacer

nonces.jpg
371273371273371273

>> No. 371281 Anonymous
6th February 2014
Thursday 12:25 pm
371281 Ken Barlow cleared of all charges
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-26068034
>> No. 371282 Anonymous
6th February 2014
Thursday 12:55 pm
371282 spacer
>>371273

Am I imagining it or is there a trend of these nonces trying to pull off an outgrown-hair boyish look? (Savile, Cliff, Bill Wyman, Roman Polanski). I've started regarding anyone with a mullet as suss. Why on earth haven't they caught Pat Sharp yet?
>> No. 371289 Anonymous
6th February 2014
Thursday 2:44 pm
371289 spacer
>>371281

I saw this on the telly, and he said, when he was thanking his supporters, thanks to the "Circle of Love". It sounded like some weird cult.

>>371282

I met Pat Sharp once, on the set of What's Up Doc. I think I was seven. It was me mate's birthday. I got to say a line at the end of the show.

"Please sir, Balgit's smoking sir."

My three seconds of fame.
>> No. 371292 Anonymous
6th February 2014
Thursday 6:57 pm
371292 spacer
So the notorious 'Cock Roache' has been cleared...no doubt it's off for a celabratory pint at the Rovers, where they don't ask for ID and neither does he!
>> No. 371299 Anonymous
6th February 2014
Thursday 9:11 pm
371299 spacer

Pat Sharp Xbox Live 02.jpg
371299371299371299
>>371282
I do wonder hpw many time he banged them.
>> No. 371300 Anonymous
6th February 2014
Thursday 9:30 pm
371300 spacer

balls.jpg
371300371300371300
>>371299
>> No. 371305 Anonymous
6th February 2014
Thursday 11:32 pm
371305 spacer
So why did Roache say long before he was arrested that rape victims "deserved it"?

Assuming he is truly innocent then I imagine he's not a fan of rape victims now.
>> No. 371306 Anonymous
7th February 2014
Friday 12:01 am
371306 spacer
>>371305
He'll be back. More will come out.
>> No. 371307 Anonymous
7th February 2014
Friday 12:06 am
371307 spacer
>>371305

He said they deserved it for doing something bad in a past life. Presumably he did something bad in his past life too to catch spurious(?) rape charges.

Glenn Hoddle got fired for saying something similar about disabled people years ago.
>> No. 371311 Anonymous
7th February 2014
Friday 6:02 am
371311 spacer
>>371305
I'm sure I read that one of the women came forward because they were angry about those comments. The unanimous verdict shows she's probably crackers.
>> No. 371385 Anonymous
9th February 2014
Sunday 12:26 am
371385 spacer
>>371306
NOT SO FAST KEN!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2554598/Cleared-Corrie-star-Bill-Roache-facing-fresh-anguish-three-women-make-new-sex-assault-allegations.html
>> No. 371386 Anonymous
9th February 2014
Sunday 12:36 am
371386 spacer
>>371385

DAILY MAIL = WISDOM.
>> No. 371387 Anonymous
9th February 2014
Sunday 1:16 am
371387 spacer
>>371385
OHHH HE WOULD HAVE GOTTEN AWAY WITH IT IF IT WEREN'T FOR HIM PEDDLING KIDS.

I'm probably the sixth person to make that joke if you count this thread and the other two Jim'll threads aren't I?
>> No. 371388 Anonymous
9th February 2014
Sunday 3:39 am
371388 spacer
>>371387
10/10
>> No. 371456 Anonymous
11th February 2014
Tuesday 1:05 am
371456 spacer
>>371385

First sentence:

>The husband of a key witness in the Bill Roache trial says she is planning civil action against him over an alleged sex assault.
>husband
>she

Assuming this isn't a typo (how could you misspell 'wife' or 'he' given 's' is on the other side of the keyboard from 'h' and 'e'), then the only logical conclusion is that this is under-researched and definitely false and inaccurate 'news'.
>> No. 371459 Anonymous
11th February 2014
Tuesday 1:21 am
371459 spacer
>>371456
"She" is the witness, you daft twat. You should instead have pointed out the awkward wording that suggests that she's suing her husband rather than Roache.
>> No. 371511 Anonymous
13th February 2014
Thursday 3:41 pm
371511 spacer
DLT FREE

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/02/13/dlt-not-guilty-_n_4780698.html?ncid=webmail1
>> No. 371515 Anonymous
13th February 2014
Thursday 4:02 pm
371515 spacer
>>371511
So... Will ANYONE actually be charged?
>> No. 371518 Anonymous
13th February 2014
Thursday 4:53 pm
371518 spacer
>>371515
I'm half expecting them to clear Jim'll's corpse after it turns out all the people he fixed it for were fantasists.
>> No. 371522 Anonymous
13th February 2014
Thursday 7:41 pm
371522 spacer
>>371518
He'll have to be dug up, Double Knighted and replanted in a Giant Golden Cigar.
>> No. 371524 Anonymous
13th February 2014
Thursday 7:56 pm
371524 spacer
>>371515
Plenty of people have been charged. The word you're looking for is "convicted"
>> No. 371527 Anonymous
13th February 2014
Thursday 11:54 pm
371527 spacer
Jim'll be fixed one day. Have faith and stay strong.
>> No. 371851 Anonymous
21st February 2014
Friday 12:27 pm
371851 spacer
This is it, lads. Even our beloved football clubs are involved:
>League One side Shrewsbury Town have appointed Michael Jackson as manager until the end of the season.
>> No. 371852 Anonymous
21st February 2014
Friday 1:14 pm
371852 spacer
>>371851
Chamone, Motherfucker.
>> No. 372390 Anonymous
4th March 2014
Tuesday 6:36 am
372390 spacer
Fucking hell lads, is Dave serious with the people he hires?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2572495/No-10-aide-arrested-child-porn-Police-quiz-man-advised-Cameron-web-filters.html
>> No. 372393 Anonymous
4th March 2014
Tuesday 6:47 am
372393 spacer
>>372390

The more zeal with which someone displays their morality, the less falseness you have to dislodge to find out just how twisted they are.
>> No. 372394 Anonymous
4th March 2014
Tuesday 8:15 am
372394 spacer
>>372390
>dailymail

This click-bate waste doesn't count as news, you know that right?
>> No. 372395 Anonymous
4th March 2014
Tuesday 8:22 am
372395 spacer
>>372394

Yeah, I know mate, why wouldn't they make up a story like this?
>> No. 372410 Anonymous
4th March 2014
Tuesday 1:39 pm
372410 spacer
>>372395
They do need to keep up repayments on the nonce paranoia or the evil noncemaster general Leveson will repossess their immortal souls.

I'm kidding, obviously. Everyone knows there are no souls at the Mail.
>> No. 372411 Anonymous
4th March 2014
Tuesday 1:48 pm
372411 spacer
>>372394
Don't act like we're any better than the Mail - this place is most active when you're gossiping like old women about the likes of Jeremy Forrest.

Also:

>bate

Lad.
>> No. 372412 Anonymous
4th March 2014
Tuesday 1:58 pm
372412 spacer
Seems Old Lady Thatcher new an awful lot of sexual predators on quite intimate levels.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 372414 Anonymous
4th March 2014
Tuesday 5:23 pm
372414 spacer
>>372390
I reckon they've known about this for a while but have waited until there's some major international happenings (russia invading crimea, in this case) to report the nonce to the plod, so they could bury the story. Any other time of the year this would be on every front page, as is you'd probably only know about it if you read the daily mail.
>> No. 372415 Anonymous
4th March 2014
Tuesday 5:48 pm
372415 spacer
>>372411

Yeah, but we don't publish this bollox to the double-digit IQ masses.
>> No. 372417 Anonymous
4th March 2014
Tuesday 6:11 pm
372417 spacer
>>372415
No need for misogyny, lad.
>> No. 372753 Anonymous
13th March 2014
Thursday 9:31 am
372753 spacer
>Steve Klein, who was asked to leave New Found Glory in December, has been charged with sexual conduct with a minor and Child Pornography offenses. The former New Found Glory guitarist is charged with two counts of lewd conduct with a minor under the age of 14, three counts of lewd conduct with a minor 14 or 15, one count of intent to commit leywd act with a minor, and one count of possession of child pornography.

They've toured with LostProphets. Maybe H led him astray or they bonded over each other's collection of kids getting pissed on.
>> No. 372771 Anonymous
13th March 2014
Thursday 7:10 pm
372771 spacer
>>372753

Will I get put on the sex offenders register if I procure a collection of children being pissed on simply because I don't like kids?
>> No. 372774 Anonymous
13th March 2014
Thursday 9:30 pm
372774 spacer
>>372771
I think you'd have bigger things to worry about than the register if you're collecting children.
>> No. 373106 Anonymous
18th March 2014
Tuesday 8:17 pm
373106 spacer
>Max Clifford jury told to 'settle down' after laughing at penis size evidence

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/mar/18/max-clifford-jury-laughing-at-evidence-sexual-assault-trial

I wouldn't be surprised if he ended up topping himself, it's utterly demeaning.
>> No. 374978 Anonymous
28th April 2014
Monday 2:41 pm
374978 Max Clifford guilty of eight indecent assaults
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27192600
>> No. 374979 Anonymous
28th April 2014
Monday 2:56 pm
374979 spacer

505px-Louis_Theroux_at_Nordiske_Mediedager_2009[1].jpg
374979374979374979
Louis Theroux has interviewed Jimmie Saville, Max Clifford, Rolph Harris and made a documentary about paedophiles. Am I wrong in thinking this man is the head of the paedophile ring?
>> No. 374980 Anonymous
28th April 2014
Monday 3:20 pm
374980 spacer
>>374978
Couldn't happen to a nicer man. With a tiny penis.
>> No. 374981 Anonymous
28th April 2014
Monday 3:21 pm
374981 spacer
>>374979
Or ahead of it. Anyone else he's interviewed will be in the firing line.
>> No. 374982 Anonymous
28th April 2014
Monday 3:37 pm
374982 spacer
>>374981

Ann Widdicome watch out.
>> No. 374983 Anonymous
28th April 2014
Monday 4:01 pm
374983 spacer
>>374979

He tried quite hard to get an interview with Michael Jackson as well and got annoyed when bashir got there first, and he was there when the Hamiltons were (wrongfully) arrested for rape.

Clearly the man is some sort of voodoo rape talisman sent by satan to corrupt the morals of our great nation
>> No. 375035 Anonymous
29th April 2014
Tuesday 12:52 am
375035 spacer

Louis-Theroux.-007.jpg
375035375035375035
Isn't it obvious already lads?

That ARE Louis is sending clear signals to us about pedogeddon prophets living among the rich and famous?

It's completely CLEAR that Ann Widdecombe is some sort of noncenator matriarch, end level boss, to all this celebrity pedoing.

Here are some facts:

- She is staunchly religious, Catholic might I add. The world's biggest and efficient pedophile organisation.
- She is a virginal, dusty spinster with hatred of all things young and vibrant.
- Used to be a Tory, nearly all of them are closet nonces and deviants.

She most likely doesn't perform in any specific kiddie-fiddling, but instead presides over it's secretive structure.
This is the tip of the ice-berg lads.
>> No. 375040 Anonymous
29th April 2014
Tuesday 1:10 am
375040 spacer
>>375035

>She most likely doesn't perform in any specific kiddie-fiddling, but instead presides over it's secretive structure.

Imagining Ann Widdicome as the Madam, in a brothel full of children and tory back benchers, is one of the more unpleasant images to have popped into my head.
>> No. 375146 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 3:27 pm
375146 spacer
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27259318

ARE MAX Jailed for 8 years.
>> No. 375153 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 5:16 pm
375153 spacer
>>375035
YE GADS MAN! Are you quite certain?
>> No. 375169 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 7:07 pm
375169 spacer
>>375146
http://www.youtube.com/v/uMB_e0PH3Hg
>> No. 375171 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 7:22 pm
375171 spacer
>>375146
That makes my cold heart warm.
>> No. 375172 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 7:29 pm
375172 spacer
>>375146

When was the last time a rich, white celebrity got jail time in this country for something other than noncing?

Jeffrey Archer?
>> No. 375175 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 7:34 pm
375175 spacer
>>375171>>375172
Do you reckon he upset somebody?
>> No. 375176 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 7:37 pm
375176 spacer
>>375169

What a LAD! By which I mean he's a paedo noncing bastard, just to propitiate the anti-nonce-enabler brigade before I get burned alive.

He always had a really smirky way on tv when he was "defending" some celebrity or other, in fact, this clip was mentioned on the PM show today as proof (hindsight is 20/20) of his guilt.
>> No. 375177 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 7:47 pm
375177 spacer
>>375176

It displays a strange sort of pride in the court case, I think anyway. I'm not saying an innocent person having to defend themselves should start self flagellating and drinking only their own tears, but reveling in being accused of sexual offenses is a tad odd, to say the least.
>> No. 375180 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 8:12 pm
375180 spacer
>>375177
He fucking loved media attention and controversy, probably gave his 1.3'' member a slight erection.
>> No. 375181 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 8:15 pm
375181 spacer
>>375172
When was the last time a rich, white celebrity did something criminal other than noncing (or tax-dodging)?
>> No. 375182 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 8:18 pm
375182 spacer
>>375181
Oscar Pistorius shot his GF to death not too long ago.
>> No. 375183 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 8:23 pm
375183 spacer
First Watkins now this:

http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/sentencing-remarks-hhj-leonard-r-v-clifford.pdf
>> No. 375184 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 8:27 pm
375184 spacer
>>375181

In this country?

Tony Blair and Wayne Rooney spring immediately to mind.
>> No. 375185 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 8:28 pm
375185 spacer
>>375183

>Counts 5 and 6 reflect the first and third occasions on which you told her to perform oral sex on you. You instructed her how to do it and criticised her performance.

What a bilend.
>> No. 375186 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 8:29 pm
375186 spacer
>>375182

That was in South Africa, where white ghettos are a real thing and not the ramblings of right wing racists.
>> No. 375187 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 8:48 pm
375187 spacer
>>375184
Their crimes were ... ? A retard says "illegal war". Now Cherie's dodgy property deals? There's a story.
>> No. 375188 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 8:54 pm
375188 spacer
>>375187

Then spill!
>> No. 375190 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 9:09 pm
375190 spacer
>>375187

I wasn't thinking war, I was thinking lying under oath and match fixing.
>> No. 375194 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 9:17 pm
375194 spacer
>>375190
When did Blair lie under oath, or Rooney take bribes?
>> No. 375198 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 9:24 pm
375198 spacer
>>375190
>match fixing
Ah, now I see where the confusion has come from. The guy you're thinking of is Wayne Rooney Sr. Not to be confused with the footballer Wayne Rooney Jr.
>> No. 375199 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 9:27 pm
375199 spacer
>>375198

However, like anyone involved with any aspect of football, they are of course, total scum.
>> No. 375201 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 9:41 pm
375201 spacer
Didn't Wazza Jr. get caught with a prozzie?
>> No. 375202 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 9:53 pm
375202 spacer
>>375201

Twice that we know of.
>> No. 375209 Anonymous
2nd May 2014
Friday 11:22 pm
375209 spacer
>>375202>>375201
I believe somebody posted her in /x/ once of a day.
>> No. 377569 Anonymous
26th June 2014
Thursday 6:06 pm
377569 spacer
http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/jimmy-savile-nhs-hospital-abuse-reports-key-findings-and-allegations/

Oh Sir Sir Saville, will they not let you rest?
>> No. 377573 Anonymous
26th June 2014
Thursday 7:36 pm
377573 spacer

psycho-645.jpg
377573377573377573
>>377569

They're on about dead bodies now. Unsurprisingly.
>> No. 377575 Anonymous
26th June 2014
Thursday 7:55 pm
377575 spacer
>>377569>>377573

It's much easier for journa-shits to frame the issue of child abuse as "this one monster did all of it forever", and the writings on Savile almost have an unspoken suggestion that it doesn't happen any more.

It's not that I don't care about the Savile cases, it's just I can't help but feel that if OAP's family regularly film them being slapped about by nurses, WTH is going on in foster homes? I don't know, maybe nothing, but can someone at least take a look?
>> No. 377577 Anonymous
26th June 2014
Thursday 8:59 pm
377577 spacer
Christ. This thread is over a year old.
>> No. 377581 Anonymous
26th June 2014
Thursday 9:33 pm
377581 spacer
>>377577

Apt.
>> No. 377588 Anonymous
26th June 2014
Thursday 11:32 pm
377588 spacer
>>377581
9/10, caught me completely unaware. Well done.
>> No. 377590 Anonymous
26th June 2014
Thursday 11:53 pm
377590 spacer
The people who are reporting now, that they got fingered when they were wee little shitbirds, are fucking cowards. Anyone who cries about anything ages after they can't do shit about it, are fucking cowards. I would have petrol bombed Saville's house and a lot of innocent people's houses if I were wronged to that degree. Fucking cowards.
>> No. 377592 Anonymous
26th June 2014
Thursday 11:58 pm
377592 spacer
>>377590
Easy there Morris.
>> No. 377593 Anonymous
26th June 2014
Thursday 11:58 pm
377593 spacer
>>377590
I was sexually assaulted by someone in a position of authoritarian power over me during my youth. If you petrol bomb their house you would get arrested, called mental or evil and get put away. What a silly and emotional response you made; you obviously have never been in this Catch 22 position of being disbelieved due to not being a respectable person.
>> No. 377595 Anonymous
27th June 2014
Friday 12:11 am
377595 spacer
>>377590

Of course you would poppet. It's not like deep psychological trauma would affect you in the same way it effects everyone else or anything. You're a strong unique individual who would always do what Tom Cruise would do in his movies to right any wrongs you suffered.

These hundreds of people participating in yewtree as witnesses just aren't as good as you. Clearly if they were they would never have been sexually assaulted in the first place. I'm sure in their situation you would have karate chopped Jim in the balls and ran straight to the nearest garage to buy a load of petrol, rags and a lighter.
>> No. 377597 Anonymous
27th June 2014
Friday 12:35 am
377597 spacer

gamaroosh.jpg
377597377597377597
>>377595
Clearly. Thank you for agreeing and understanding. You can't be abused unless you allow it to happen by being weak.

>>377593
Fuck you. Fuck your abuser. Fuck the government. Fuck the prisons. Fuck it all.

How can you be such a coward? Go murder your abuser and get back some dignity. This is what is wrong with this country.
>> No. 377598 Anonymous
27th June 2014
Friday 12:38 am
377598 spacer
>>377597
I think he's dead now but I did enjoy your nihilism and the extraordinary gamaroosh thing.
>> No. 377599 Anonymous
27th June 2014
Friday 12:49 am
377599 spacer

Anonamom.gif
377599377599377599
>>377597
>You can't be abused unless you allow it to happen by being weak.
>Fuck the system rarrrrr

Does your mum know you haven't taken your Ritalin today, lad?
>> No. 377600 Anonymous
27th June 2014
Friday 1:01 am
377600 spacer
All of this makes me deeply ashamed for not having taken photographs of that nutter under the bridge in Cardiff. The writing on his banners just gets bigger and more unhinged the further down each sheet you go. Apparently he doesn't like paedophiles, but also doesn't like people being falsely accused of paedophilia either.
>> No. 377601 Anonymous
27th June 2014
Friday 1:05 am
377601 spacer
>>377597
You know, to catch a thief...
>> No. 377602 Anonymous
27th June 2014
Friday 1:10 am
377602 spacer
>>377598
I'm sorry to hear that mate. You should have murdered him and all those he loved.

>>377599
I'm sorry for thinking that doing something against people fucking with you is bad. I will tell people to wait for 40 years and tell the newspapers about it next time. I'm sorry.

>>377601
You can't nonce your noncer. Unless you apply to work for one of the care homes they will be housed in, and abuse them then. Even that won't be noncing.
>> No. 377603 Anonymous
27th June 2014
Friday 1:13 am
377603 spacer
>>377602
What about their grandkids?
>> No. 377604 Anonymous
27th June 2014
Friday 1:13 am
377604 spacer
>>377602

People not running around murdering others is what's wrong with this country?
>> No. 377605 Anonymous
27th June 2014
Friday 1:16 am
377605 spacer
>>377590>>377597>>377602

Yer m80, i't be just like die hard but wiv pedos and not germans except german pedos.

How come my great comments get ignored when this shit bird troll gets so many replies? Clearly I'm too smart.

>>377600

Que? Is this a .gs thing I haven't heard or is there a genuine nutter living under a bridge in Cardiff? I mean, there probably is, but this sounds like a specific nutter.
>> No. 377606 Anonymous
27th June 2014
Friday 1:19 am
377606 spacer
>>377604
No. Just taking shit, and complaining about it is what is wrong. If every noncee murdered their noncer, we wouldn't have any problems.

>>377603
The lad thinks there are rules and shit, so he obviously won't be convinced. But honestly, anyone minutely and indirectly related to the paedophile is fair game. How do people accept the shit that happens to them? I could never come to terms with it. I would do something about it.
>> No. 377607 Anonymous
27th June 2014
Friday 1:23 am
377607 spacer
>>377605
He's a very specific nutter with some very specific banners, who appears every so often under a railway bridge. He may appear elsewhere, but he certainly turns up under the bridge near where I work.
>> No. 377608 Anonymous
27th June 2014
Friday 1:33 am
377608 spacer
>>377606

You sound like a sophomoric American who just got done listening to everything Doug Stanhope has ever released, only you forgot it was comedy.
>> No. 377616 Anonymous
27th June 2014
Friday 11:17 am
377616 spacer
>>377597
>You can't be abused unless you allow it to happen by being weak.
We've had our fair share of wankers on .gs in our time but you may be the biggest wanker yet. Here's hoping you get bored and leave soon.
>> No. 377617 Anonymous
27th June 2014
Friday 11:33 am
377617 spacer
>>377599
I have ADHD, please don't equate me with this mentalist cunt.
>> No. 377623 Anonymous
27th June 2014
Friday 2:25 pm
377623 spacer
>>377616
So why are you jerking him off?
>> No. 377762 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 3:18 pm
377762 spacer
GUILTY. The dirty old shitbastard.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-28094561
>> No. 377766 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 3:40 pm
377766 spacer
>>377762
Childhood ruined. I never thought Rolf smelt of hammers, but now.
>> No. 377768 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 4:10 pm
377768 spacer
>>377762
Shocking, didn't expect this verdict.
>> No. 377770 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 5:15 pm
377770 spacer
So is Glitter next to go in front of the judge?

At least that'll be quick. In - Guilty - Out.

Christmas Panto will be good this year.
>> No. 377771 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 5:27 pm
377771 spacer

image.jpg
377771377771377771
>>377762

Rolf's website's a goner too.
>> No. 377774 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 6:18 pm
377774 spacer
What sentence do we reckon he'll get?

If only we had an island we could send these hardcore criminals to and just leave them there. That would definitely sort this problem out forever.
>> No. 377775 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 6:20 pm
377775 spacer
>>377774
5 years. I'll put a few quid on that.
>> No. 377776 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 6:24 pm
377776 spacer
>>377774
IIRC there was one island with a very small population, less than a hundred and everyone was a nonce. Was in the news in the 90s I think.
>> No. 377777 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 6:26 pm
377777 spacer
I decided that I don't believe he's guilty and even if he is I don't care because he's a swell guy. We all have our guilty pleasures I suppose, he's no different.
>> No. 377778 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 6:26 pm
377778 spacer
>>377776
I get the feeling you've missed my subtle joke about Rolf being Australian.

Mind you, if you can find a link I'd be interested to hear about that.
>> No. 377779 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 6:27 pm
377779 spacer
>>377778

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/isle-of-wight-dubbed-paedo-island-148735
>> No. 377780 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 6:28 pm
377780 spacer
>>377777

I'm not sure my panchont... err, pawnchaunt... no...

I don't know how to spell so good! ;_;
>> No. 377781 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 6:29 pm
377781 spacer
>>377778
Oh no I got it but you just reminded me of that small island of nonces.

Though I would much prefer not to insert "paedophile island" into google.
>> No. 377782 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 6:32 pm
377782 spacer
>>377781
You should be OK. If anyone asks, you were looking up Brass Eye references.

Obviously his sentence hasn't been handed down yet, but I wonder can he tell what it is yet?
>> No. 377783 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 6:34 pm
377783 spacer
>>377776
Possibly this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pitcairn_Islands#Sexual_assault_trials_of_2004
>> No. 377785 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 6:49 pm
377785 spacer
>>377783

God, that place sounds nightmarish. Living in a town of 30,000 is bad enough.
>> No. 377787 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 7:05 pm
377787 spacer
Nooooo... the country's fucked. No man will be trusted again. Saville - fair enough, creepy as hell, no one liked him but Rolf seemed lovely.
>> No. 377789 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 7:36 pm
377789 spacer
I went on the internet and I found this:
http://www.youtube.com/v/WwylBRucU7w?start=419&end=422
>> No. 377790 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 7:38 pm
377790 spacer
I feel sorry for KFC. They're going to have to find a new logo.
>> No. 377791 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 7:45 pm
377791 spacer
>>377787
>Saville - fair enough, creepy as hell, no one liked him

That's the thing though, at one point Savile was the most popular man in Britain. British Rail commissioned extensive research to find the most likeable celebrity to front their "Age of the Train" promotion campaign and Savile won by a landslide. BR execs were obviously a bit reluctant to make a weirdo DJ the public face of the railways, but they couldn't argue with the research.

I think it's a bit like Thatcher - she won three elections and increased her majority in each, but nobody will admit to having voted for her.

http://www.youtube.com/v/SjO7CEtrhPE
>> No. 377792 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 7:53 pm
377792 spacer
>>377787

I'm not entirely sure how to feel about this either:
On the one hand he's guilty of feeling up 8 and 9 year olds.
On the other he's a icon of my youth and was there at our high school's leaving ceremony.

I can entirely understand why people don't come forward until it's all in the news as 12 independent people all have said he's guilty yet I still can't believe it.
>> No. 377793 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 7:54 pm
377793 spacer
>>377792

There are twelve people in a jury right?
>> No. 377794 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 7:56 pm
377794 spacer
>>377791

I think the problem is simply that thanks to this ongoing saga, a lot of people have been forced to confront a reality that they have previously been unable to even consider: That being a paedophile does not also automatically make you into a disgusting, loathesome monster. It flies in the face of the completely black-and-white moral paradigm the media wants to teach us.
>> No. 377796 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 7:59 pm
377796 spacer
>>377791
>British Rail commissioned extensive research to find the most likeable celebrity to front their "Age of the Train" promotion campaign and Savile won by a landslide.
They did screen tests and showed them to focus groups. They initially wanted Terry Wogan, but he came second.
>> No. 377797 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 8:05 pm
377797 spacer
>>377793

I think they have 14. 12 jurors and 2 alternate jurors who watch the whole trial so that if 1 of the 12 dies or goes nuts during the trial they can just carry on as they were without starting over again. Then at the end if nobody dies the 2 alternate jurors are told to fuck off without getting to send anyone to the gallows.

I have absolutely no idea and I based my entire post on that 6 second scene at the start of 12 Angry Men. I did it because I wanted to crowbar 12 Angry Men in to this conversation, because it's a very worthwhile watch. If you want the answer to your question Wikipedia can probably tell you quite quickly.
>> No. 377798 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 8:06 pm
377798 spacer
>>377794
The great difficulty with this is that the media's response to things such as this is to whip up paranoia with NOW ANYONE COULD BE A PAEDOPHILE and NONCES NONCES EVERYWHERE.
>> No. 377799 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 8:13 pm
377799 spacer
>>377797
Typically about 16 jurors are picked out for trial, taken up to the courtroom, where their names are drawn from a hat and they are presented in turn to the prosecution and the defence. The surplus is in case any of the jurors turns out to be unsuitable. 12 are picked out, the rest go back down to the juror pool. If something happens to one of the jurors, I think they just continue with 11.
>> No. 377800 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 8:14 pm
377800 spacer
>>377798

And then this which will be coming our way soon:

http://reason.com/blog/2014/06/30/every-child-in-scotland-to-be-supervised?n_play=53b1926ae4b0175ffa5cbb2d

Bye bye England
>> No. 377801 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 8:25 pm
377801 spacer
>>377800
Are you sincerely posting randroid hogwash?

hahaha.
>> No. 377802 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 8:27 pm
377802 spacer
>>377800
But doesn't this increase the chance the kid is going to get abused by the shadow parent?
>> No. 377803 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 8:33 pm
377803 spacer
>>377801

Is this a better link for you, dickwash?

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2014/8/contents/enacted
>> No. 377804 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 8:33 pm
377804 spacer
>>377776
Pitcairn?
>> No. 377805 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 8:35 pm
377805 spacer
>>377802

No, the shadow parent is provided by our ever loving and watchful guardian class
>> No. 377806 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 8:39 pm
377806 spacer
>>377800

>Free minds, free markets

NYET!
>> No. 377807 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 8:42 pm
377807 spacer
>>377803
Yes and no. On one hand it's not puerile rubbish which pretends that the only harm that comes to children is hurting themselves from climbing trees, but on the other it's as lang's my arm.
>> No. 377808 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 8:48 pm
377808 spacer
Lang's my u wot m1?
>> No. 377809 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 9:05 pm
377809 spacer
>>377807

Ok here's another link:

http://www.scotborders.gov.uk/info/1361/children_and_families/639/getting_it_right_for_every_child/2
>> No. 377811 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 9:11 pm
377811 spacer
>>377809

That doesn't sound so bad. I think the who and how is something of a mystery though. That other article made it sound as if every Scotch kid was going to have a 24/7 minder lurking over their shoulder.
>> No. 377812 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 9:16 pm
377812 spacer
>>377809
I don't see the problem with that. I've had something like that all my life, they're called 'godparents'.
>> No. 377813 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 9:17 pm
377813 spacer
>>377811
Of course it does, it's the usual Randroid bullshit about

>BIG STATE TAKING AWAY ARE KIDS, ANARCHO-CAPITALISM NOW

etc ad nauseam.
>> No. 377814 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 9:23 pm
377814 spacer
>>377811

It sounds sinister as fuck to me.

--

I'm going to show you some pictures little Johnny. Now, what I want you to do is pretend to be your daddy and say what he would say at home if he saw them.

Bloody queers!
Bloody foreigners taking our jobs!
Pathetic woman!

Thank you Johnny. You did very well. Meet your new dad and dad...
>> No. 377815 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 9:24 pm
377815 spacer
>>377812

You've got state sponsored god parents?
>> No. 377816 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 9:26 pm
377816 spacer
>>377815
I don't know what the fuck 'state sponsored' means in this context, though I expect you associate the term with something horrifying and Stalinist.
>> No. 377817 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 9:36 pm
377817 spacer
>>377816

All I know is that not very long ago, a child was taken from his foster parents because the father was a Drunken Racists supporter.
>> No. 377818 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 9:40 pm
377818 spacer
>>377817
If that's all you know then maybe you should shut your fucking mouth.
>> No. 377819 Anonymous
30th June 2014
Monday 9:51 pm
377819 spacer
>>377818

I only come here for the quality discussions
>> No. 377822 Anonymous
1st July 2014
Tuesday 12:02 am
377822 spacer

brglitter.jpg
377822377822377822
>>377791
Let's not forget the railcard adverts BR made starring Gary Glitter trying hard to look younger. They haven't got a particularly good track record when it comes to not hiring nonces, eh.
>> No. 377823 Anonymous
1st July 2014
Tuesday 12:10 am
377823 spacer
>>377822

Jesus, really? More like British Rapists!

Also Hydra doesn't make you look younger, it fixes limb damage.
>> No. 377824 Anonymous
1st July 2014
Tuesday 12:13 am
377824 spacer
I didn't know this Rolf Harris or Saville guys. All of a sudden I am being told they are a big deal. Something is wrong with your society. How can they get away with the shit they pulled for so long? Ya'll are fucked.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 377825 Anonymous
1st July 2014
Tuesday 12:25 am
377825 spacer
>>377824

>Ya'll are fucked.
Not quite all of us, but they gave it a good go.
>> No. 377827 Anonymous
1st July 2014
Tuesday 1:09 am
377827 spacer
>>377823

Mirth.

I've been playing New Vegas with a graphical overhaul mod and it looks amazing. The only game altering mod I downloaded was the weapon mods expanded and the weapon mod vending machine and it makes the guns so much more fun now everything can be upgraded. Costs a fortune in caps though, took me a whole day to get enough money to upgrade the Ranger Sequoia.
>> No. 377829 Anonymous
1st July 2014
Tuesday 1:51 am
377829 spacer
>>377827
Could you direct me to the mods in particular?

Only ever finished it on the 360, but now thanks to the Steam sale, ready to begin afresh.
>> No. 377830 Anonymous
1st July 2014
Tuesday 2:58 am
377830 spacer
>>377829

Don't mess about with it too much, otherwise it is a cunt to optimise and get the load order right. Took me a day of crashes and tweaking to get it right.

Go to nexus mods, download their inhouse mod manager. Don't click the mod manager download link on the site for the first two mods, download manually.

Download 4gb patch manually, cut and paste the dll and crack files into he new vegas directory. Create a shortcut to desktop for the crack, this is now your launch point.

Download New Vegas Script Extender manually, or NVSE, and repeat as for 4gb patch.

Now you can download NMC's Texture pack. If you have a good enough card to run it on ultra and have enough RAM (at least 4) then get the large pack. If not, get one of the smaller ones I'll let you decide. Use the manager download link and it will download to the manager automatically. Once downloaded, you can then activate and install it. This comes in 3 parts, and when it asks you to upgrade while installing them one at a time select no. Same goes for the patches, which are recommended by the modder, but when prompted to overwrite select yes to all.

After doing that, it should be simple enough for you to get the rest sorted.

I recommend:

-New Vegas Stutter Remover
-New Vegas Anti Crash
-WMX Weapon Mods Expanded + patches for WRP/dlc if applicable
-WRP Weapon Retexture Project + patches for dlc, etc.
-Weapon Mods Vending Machine
-More Perks
-Perk every level (this is a must for me, it annoyed me in the vanilla game.)

Some will recommend others such as Project Nevada, but I feel they alter the game too much. Project Nevada especially so. EVE - Essential Visual Enhancements is good though, but I couldn't get the compatibility patch to download so I deleted it.

Once you have everything, you will need to download BOSS Userlist Manager and check your plugin load order against it's masterlist. You can filter the masterlist by right clicking on it and selecting "installed mods" or similar. Then put you plugins in that order.

To launch the game, make sure Steam is on and then use your previously created shortcut to launch the game. You must use this to launch the game every time, otherwise it'll crash on you. A lot.

Have fun.
>> No. 377831 Anonymous
1st July 2014
Tuesday 7:45 am
377831 spacer
>>377824
I don't really think America is in any position to comment on these kinds of things really, especially given the fact that your PAEDO PAEDO hysteria is even shriller than ours.
>> No. 377846 Anonymous
2nd July 2014
Wednesday 1:25 am
377846 spacer
http://www.youtube.com/v/Z0rlYSJQkyw

Its amazing how hindsight works on things
>> No. 377847 Anonymous
2nd July 2014
Wednesday 4:05 am
377847 spacer
>>377830

He really really ought to get Fellout as well. I can't stand the orange overlay.
>> No. 377851 Anonymous
2nd July 2014
Wednesday 11:09 am
377851 spacer
>>377847

Is this the same sort of thing as the Deus Ex Irn Bru filter?

I didn't get it, but I might because it is starting to get annoying. To add to my original post, I think New Vegas Anti Crash might be causing a pronounced stutter, even with Stutter remover on, as once I disabled it the problem stopped.
>> No. 377852 Anonymous
2nd July 2014
Wednesday 12:37 pm
377852 spacer

1290_2672-1-1231593692[1].jpg
377852377852377852
>>377851
Yeah, same as Deus Ex HR's piss filter and Fallout 3's green filter. Fellout is probably the most essential graphical mod for the two most recent Fallout games, as otherwise everything looks washed out with the green/orange hue.
>> No. 377853 Anonymous
2nd July 2014
Wednesday 3:04 pm
377853 spacer
>>377846
That's just odd.
>> No. 377856 Anonymous
2nd July 2014
Wednesday 4:19 pm
377856 spacer
>>377852
I'm a little uncomfortable with these mods. I understand an urge for things to be 'properly' coloured, but it's an artistic choice by the designers for the game to look that way and this feels like pissing all over that choice.
>> No. 377857 Anonymous
2nd July 2014
Wednesday 5:13 pm
377857 spacer
>>377856

It's a piss poor and lazy "artistic decision" though, which is why people remove it. Why bother creating a thematically consistent and appropriately lit world when we can just stick this filter over it?

It's apples and oranges really though from a player perspective, removing the filter only leaves you with a differently shit graphical experience. If you leave the filter on everything is a washed out monochrome; turn it off and you're left with a game so badly coordinated that it looks like the texture artists were colour blind.
>> No. 377858 Anonymous
2nd July 2014
Wednesday 5:22 pm
377858 spacer
>>377857
Clearly they didn't create an otherwise thematically consistent and appropriately lit world because they felt it was more thematically consistent and appropriate to put that filter on. The texture artists weren't colour blind, they were working to create something that compliments the filter. So you don't like the default settings, fine. But you're also whining about how it looks after you've pissed around with it too, and blaming that on the developers. That's silly.
>> No. 377859 Anonymous
2nd July 2014
Wednesday 5:27 pm
377859 spacer
>>377858

I don't how it is. What I'm saying is that it looks shit either way because it is, indeed, shit.

The removal of the filter is an attempt to make it look less shit, which doesn't work, because the filter wasn't entirely responsible for the game looking shit, it was just the fact that the game actually does look shit, a fact that wasn't helped by painting the whole thing pond-scum green.

TL;DR I'm not that bothered about pissing all over the developer's artistic choices when they were clearly all shit artists anyway.
>> No. 377860 Anonymous
2nd July 2014
Wednesday 5:29 pm
377860 spacer
>>377859

Also, I would bet good money that the filter was added about three quarters of the way through the creative process, and when everyone saw it they just said "Genius. Guess we can all go home early, and buy Jenkins a beer."
>> No. 377870 Anonymous
2nd July 2014
Wednesday 9:36 pm
377870 spacer
Remove the filter and install a custom hi-res texture pack. That's how you make the game look better.
>> No. 377872 Anonymous
2nd July 2014
Wednesday 10:20 pm
377872 spacer
>>377857

Fallout is a bad example because it has a legitimate lore related reason to have a green hue, everything is massively fucking irradiated. The game takes the artistic decision to be comical with this, with its funky 20s music and groan worthy mock posters. A perfect example of its attempt to be comical is the add on Old World Blues, if you've played it then you'll know exactly what I mean.

With that in mind a sickly greenish hue over everything representing radiation makes sense in terms of Fallout's self-depreciating comic relief.

A better example would be Battlefield, which put so much blue over everything I thought my telly was broke when I first played it. I think Skyrim does it too, but I can't be sure as it's been a while.
>> No. 377874 Anonymous
2nd July 2014
Wednesday 10:48 pm
377874 spacer
>>377872
Old World Blues was insanely boring to play and to look at. Never understood why people liked it so much.
>> No. 377876 Anonymous
2nd July 2014
Wednesday 11:05 pm
377876 spacer
>>377874

I actually only started it last week. I spent a long time talking to the 5 scientists in the Sink (who I suspect will turn out to be teenagers who managed to preserve themselves or something similar) and I've only just ventured out in to the crater about an hour ago. It seems well put together and is quite interesting.

Maybe I just like the extra content. I don't see what's so bad about it though.
>> No. 377880 Anonymous
3rd July 2014
Thursday 12:12 am
377880 spacer

Pripyat-today[1].jpg
377880377880377880
>>377872
Being massively irradiated doesn't make everything green. And I don't think it was a comedic decision, as FO3 is probably the most 'straight' in the series, and the first to have that hue. FO and FO2 didn't have that. Also it's set 200 years after the war, for reference the picture here is of Pripyat about 20 years after Chernobyl. It was massively irradiated, and doesn't have an ugly green hue. I think it was just a lazy way of showing that this was indeed a nuclear wasteland.

>>377874
I think Old World Blues had some funny dialogue and I thought the setting and the brains in jar thing was funny. The actual gameplay bored me shitless though.
>> No. 377881 Anonymous
3rd July 2014
Thursday 12:53 am
377881 spacer
>>377874
SCIENCE!
>> No. 377882 Anonymous
3rd July 2014
Thursday 12:54 am
377882 spacer
Strange that this has come up just as I've started my first modded playthrough of FO3.

Have it on the 360, been through it plus DLC countless times, and after half a day on PC with Fellout & a texture pack, plus changeable FOV, I don't see myself ever going back to the 360 version.

Also nude wimminz.
>> No. 377885 Anonymous
3rd July 2014
Thursday 3:38 am
377885 spacer
>>377880
I can't believe you actually posted a picture of Pripyat to prove your point. As though you expect people to see it and think "Well what do you know, it isn't green!"

Do you have any more photos you can show us to prove there aren't any radscorpions or giant ants?
>> No. 377886 Anonymous
3rd July 2014
Thursday 5:36 am
377886 spacer

Capture.jpg
377886377886377886
>>377885

There seem to be eerie shadow people

http://maps.yandex.ru/?ll=30.058157%2C51.405982&spn=0.001717%2C0.001074&z=17&l=sat%2Cstv&ol=stv&oll=30.058154%2C51.406557&ost=dir%3A-14.811475%2C5.632122~spn%3A90%2C51.525206
>> No. 377887 Anonymous
3rd July 2014
Thursday 7:56 am
377887 spacer
>>377876
To me it was really dull, the drab grey/blue everywhere, the lack-lustre enemies, the way your characters ends up becoming this hyper-overpowered entity makes rest of the game pointless.

The best DLC I've played from the FO series was Point Lookout, it seemed like a survival horror with excellent atmosphere.

NV DLC was meh, Lonesome road was good - although it felt a lot of it was a linear adventure. Honest Hearts was honestly the best looking one as it was in a preserved national park.
>> No. 377900 Anonymous
3rd July 2014
Thursday 3:37 pm
377900 spacer
I would've thought lessening the intensity of the green filter would be smarter than removing it altogether. Surely the artists would have accounted for the filter and textured accordingly? High vibrancy to cut through it, like.
>> No. 377906 Anonymous
3rd July 2014
Thursday 5:50 pm
377906 spacer
Ahem, maybe someone should make an /e/ thread?
>> No. 377911 Anonymous
3rd July 2014
Thursday 6:44 pm
377911 spacer
>>377906
Yeah this thread has been entirely derailed. Odd that.
>> No. 377919 Anonymous
3rd July 2014
Thursday 7:57 pm
377919 spacer
Back on topic http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2678576/Leon-Brittans-faulty-memory-ticking-timebomb-shake-Westminster-Tory-peer-faces-questions-1980s-files-complied-MP-Geoffrey-Dickens-Westminster-paedophile-ring.html IT'S ALL COMING OUT NOW LADS

It probably won't all come out lads but I do wonder if we'll see more high profile names who aren't celebrities getting dragged through the mud.
>> No. 377927 Anonymous
3rd July 2014
Thursday 9:43 pm
377927 spacer
>>377919
This is great.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2679500/Downing-Street-paying-welfare-officer-look-former-Cameron-adviser-Patrick-Rock-charged-possessing-child-porn.html

> Rock's trial is an embarrassment for Downing Street as he was heavily involved in drawing up Government policy on filters designed to block vile images of child abuse.
>> No. 377943 Anonymous
4th July 2014
Friday 11:00 am
377943 spacer
>>377927
An inside man.
>> No. 377945 Anonymous
4th July 2014
Friday 12:11 pm
377945 spacer
https://mobile.twitter.com/UKPaedos_Named?p=s

Live tweets of the trial, also postponed until 12:30.
>> No. 377946 Anonymous
4th July 2014
Friday 12:14 pm
377946 spacer
>>377945
Oh Christ, it's one of these. 'protectin are kids'
>> No. 377947 Anonymous
4th July 2014
Friday 12:17 pm
377947 spacer
>>377946

1 retweet = 1 child saved
>> No. 377948 Anonymous
4th July 2014
Friday 12:47 pm
377948 spacer
>>377945

My assumption that anyone who uses the word "paedo" is prole-scum is correct, no? It's basically a verbal neck tattoo.
>> No. 377949 Anonymous
4th July 2014
Friday 1:22 pm
377949 spacer
Five years, nine months. Will probably be out in three.
>> No. 377950 Anonymous
4th July 2014
Friday 1:48 pm
377950 spacer
>>377949

>>377775 called it!
>> No. 377959 Anonymous
4th July 2014
Friday 2:42 pm
377959 spacer
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-28164174

Bit of a waste of money if you ask me.
>> No. 377964 Anonymous
4th July 2014
Friday 2:51 pm
377964 spacer
>>377949
They've dropped the outstanding charges, presumably because at his age he's now more likely to die than complete his sentence.
>> No. 377997 Anonymous
4th July 2014
Friday 4:26 pm
377997 spacer
>>377950
Indeed I did! Quite pleased with that.

I hope he takes the time to consider his actions and face up to what he has done. He may well die in prison but he can still be of some use to society via donating to sexual abuse charities and whatnot.
>> No. 378003 Anonymous
4th July 2014
Friday 5:35 pm
378003 spacer
>>377950
No he didn't. No bookie in the land would pay out on that.
>> No. 378016 Anonymous
4th July 2014
Friday 8:42 pm
378016 spacer
I still don't quite believe these recent high profile cases reflect the truth of what happened, particularly for Rolf. In fact I feel like I need a proper journalist or police insider to tell me what the fuck is actually going on with Yewtree. At the moment everything I've read about all of this has amounted to a dry summary of court proceedings.
>> No. 378017 Anonymous
4th July 2014
Friday 8:45 pm
378017 spacer
>>378016

What exactly are you doubtful about?
>> No. 378027 Anonymous
4th July 2014
Friday 9:28 pm
378027 spacer
>>378017

I'm not sure, the fact that it's media reporting on itself, with big well-known names in the mix, along with the fact that underage sex is an issue most react extremely strongly to (I've heard more than a few casual death threats about this), just all makes me think that any reporting on the subject is going to be hopelessly fudged or minimal.

When you're exposed to enough news, you learn to read between the lines with who is reporting on what and for what reason, what sort of historical relationships a particular bunch will have with an institution. Here it seems like there's no precedent for what's happening, no point of reference.

Sage for rambling, post-working-week bollocks.
>> No. 378028 Anonymous
4th July 2014
Friday 9:37 pm
378028 spacer
>>378027

Media bias or not the established facts are that Rolf Harris spent several decades groping vulnerable young girls and women. I'm still not sure why this brings into question a "disbelief" in the case.

Sage for reply to "rambling, post-working-week bollocks".
>> No. 378029 Anonymous
4th July 2014
Friday 9:56 pm
378029 spacer
>>378028

That's just the thing, the facts have been established off the back of this weird spectacle. So many things play into how and why an investigation is conducted, which in turn affects the outcome. Yewtree arguably wouldn't exist (at least not in the form it does now) if not for how this all unfolded with Savile and so on, surely?

When I say 'still don't quite believe' I mean just that, that I'm struggling to come to a clear position in my head because I feel there's more to understand about it. Perhaps I've just not been following closely enough, but what makes you call on the established facts with such confidence? Sincere question, it might help me get to grips with everything.
>> No. 378045 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 1:03 am
378045 spacer
>>378029
I'm confused by your confusion. What are you suggesting? That there's a conspiracy, or something?
>> No. 378057 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 2:02 am
378057 spacer
Frankly I don't see much of a problem with what he's done. It's not like he raped someone.

And now hardened crims are going to make are Rolf play their didgeridoo, it's so sad. Front page of the Mirror in 7 months: "I RAPED ROLF HARRIS". Comment section full of vindictive arseholes saying how he deserves all the bumming he gets and how he's sick etc.

Also /101/ for how the Sun said he was "found guilty of being a peadophile". No he was not, unless "being a paedophile" is now a crime. Aaargh.
>> No. 378058 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 2:18 am
378058 spacer
>>378057
Listen here nonce. Paedophilia is a crime, you sick fuck. He took advantage of little kids, but that doesn't matter to you, does it? Frankly, I hope he gets raped. He more than deserves it. I'm surprised they only sentenced him to five fucking years.

You nonces should be wiped out.
>> No. 378059 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 2:20 am
378059 spacer
>>378057

I bet and hope the noncecase is shutting himself.
>> No. 378060 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 2:30 am
378060 spacer
>>378058
Paedophilia isn't a crime, child molestation is a crime.
>> No. 378061 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 2:38 am
378061 spacer
>>378058

What a strange and uneducated attitude. Even being in favour of peadophilia doesn't make one a paedophile, much less expressing hope that a paedophile doesn't get raped.

Jesus Christ you have a strange mindset.
>> No. 378062 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 2:39 am
378062 spacer
>>378058

Also, you call me a sick fuck and then go on to claim that you hope he gets raped and that he deserves it! Nobody deserves to be raped.
>> No. 378063 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 2:43 am
378063 spacer
Didn't we have a whole discussion in a thread a few months ago about what is considered rape by definition and by law?

I haven't been following the Rolf story a lot. Did he rape or did he do sexual assault?
>> No. 378064 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 2:55 am
378064 spacer
>>378063
The jury's still out - even they can't tell what it is yet.
>> No. 378065 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 3:28 am
378065 spacer
>>378060
If paedophilia isn't a crime, then it should be. Sick nonces like >>378057 want to go around and tell us about the virtues of taking advantage of eight year olds. You make me sick.

>>378061
>>378062
You don't have to post multiple times to make-believe that there are more sick bastards like you around. There are people who deserve to be raped and murdered. People like you, you fucking nonce. How can you go around and tell people that Rolf is innocent and misunderstood? You best be a troll and troll elsewhere. Nonces like you disgust me. Go find another place where your kind will be accepted. Noncelad.
>> No. 378066 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 3:30 am
378066 spacer
>>378065

Retard.
>> No. 378067 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 3:33 am
378067 spacer
>>378066
What made you be attracted to five year olds?
>> No. 378068 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 3:46 am
378068 spacer
What are your thoughts on ephebophiles, lads?
>> No. 378070 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 4:33 am
378070 spacer
>>378068

That word is associated with terrible threads.
>> No. 378071 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 6:21 am
378071 spacer
>>378029

Barman from the Winchester here. I still don't really understand what your issue is. For one thing the post-trial reporting has been very in depth - for what I hope are obvious reasons (however, just in case: Contempt of Court), reporting during a trial is severely limited, more so during crimes involving sex and/or children.

Give me a set of straight questions and I shall try and give you answers and definitely pour you a pint.
>> No. 378075 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 10:50 am
378075 spacer
>>378065
>There are people who deserve to be raped and murdered.
Ladies and gentlemen, our resident pschopath.

I wonder if he's a real life violent nutter or if it's all just talk?
>> No. 378079 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 11:32 am
378079 spacer
>>378065

If paedophilia became a crime, ever 10 year old in the land (by your logic) should be jailed and/or raped and murdered then?

Paedophilia is just a word that describes something, it is not an act that can be made illegal. It is defined as an attraction to pre-pubescents, i.e. 10 year olds liking other 10 year olds not as an adult interfering with pre-pubescents, with the latter being a demonstrably traumatising act to commit against a child. Children aren't harmed by paedophilia, they are harmed by child molesters/rapists who also happen to be paedophiles.

I think you are protesting a bit too strongly to be being facetious here, there is no subtlety. Were you nonced in that frothy gaping maw you call a mouth?
>> No. 378082 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 11:48 am
378082 spacer
>>378079

Back to /lab/ Adventurer.
>> No. 378083 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 12:32 pm
378083 spacer
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10947561/More-than-10-politicians-on-list-held-by-police-investigating-Westminster-paedophile-ring.html

I heard about the supposed parliamentary nonce ring a while ago and people have been talking about it for years, I always figured it would be something that would never be looked into. Now I'm finally starting to think something might just actually happen.
>> No. 378084 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 1:08 pm
378084 spacer
>>378083

The more politicians get caught up in this the more likely parliament will be to pass a statute of limitations on sex offenses like most European countries have.
>> No. 378085 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 1:17 pm
378085 spacer
>>378084

My God that would be hilarious, the Sun and Star would go absolutely apeshit, the Mirror would have a running feature about it every day, the Mail just wouldn't have a clue whether to support the Tories or stick with their broken Britain sick nonces line, the Independent would probably feature an opinion piece with opposing arguments from a nonce and a noncee, the Guardian would hail it as a progressive move from an outdated government, meanwhile the Indie will run with a full front page splash of a beached whale dying in the states and why we should donate to the RSPCA.
>> No. 378086 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 1:27 pm
378086 spacer
>>378084 They can change the law but their reputations will still be in tatters cause everyone knows they done a noncing.
>> No. 378087 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 1:29 pm
378087 spacer

young_tony_blair1.jpg
378087378087378087
>>378084

I'm just waiting for Tony Blair to be investigated. It wouldn't surprise me if he fucked a few underage girls back in the 70's.
>> No. 378089 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 2:59 pm
378089 spacer
>>378085

The Independent and Indie are two different papers?
>> No. 378091 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 3:20 pm
378091 spacer
>>378089

I noticed that, he probably meant the to say the graun for one of them but got carried away in the giddiness of his own rhetoric. Still made me smile.
>> No. 378094 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 3:45 pm
378094 spacer
>>378089
>>378091

The Independent is a large and unwieldy thing that has no business calling itself a paper. The Indie is a little magazine type thing that costs 20p. I might have the name of the little one wrong, but have a look when you get down to the shop tomorrow. The thing I think is called the Indie will have a whale, dolphin, endangered bird or war torn land splashed across the front.

I'll do some cursory googling when I get back to the computer.
>> No. 378095 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 3:48 pm
378095 spacer
>>378094

It's just called i.
>> No. 378096 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 3:53 pm
378096 spacer
>>378095

Oh, well that was supposed to be the punchline. It doesn't really work when the crescendo of your rhetoric lampooning others contains a rather large factual error. Sage for stupidity.
>> No. 378104 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 10:37 pm
378104 spacer
Just seen an advert by the Express saying that tomorrow they have the 'exclusive' of Vanessa Feltz revealing how Rolf groped her live on air. Christ.
>> No. 378105 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 10:56 pm
378105 spacer
So what exactly were his crimes? He fucked a few teenage girls and pinched the bum of an 8 year old decades ago? Wow.
>> No. 378106 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 11:03 pm
378106 spacer
>>378105
If that had happened today it would be fine because they'd all be in their forties or more.
>> No. 378107 Anonymous
5th July 2014
Saturday 11:13 pm
378107 spacer
>>378105

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indecent_assault
>> No. 378109 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 1:11 am
378109 spacer
Beyond Reasonable Doubt?

http://www.libertarianview.co.uk/current-affairs/rolf-harris-beyond-reasonable-doubt
>> No. 378110 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 1:34 am
378110 spacer
>>378109
Crikey. If only he'd had some kind of legal representation during his court case. They'd have torn that shit to shreds.
>> No. 378111 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 1:39 am
378111 spacer
>>378109

Are you implying that an English court (i.e. one of the best courts in the world) would have allowed such glaring factual inaccuracies to go unanswered? Christ, that article has its head up its own arse more than a retarded ostrich at one of Rolf's didgeridoo concerts.
>> No. 378112 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 1:45 am
378112 spacer
>>378111

>one of the best courts in the world

You actually believe this?
>> No. 378113 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 1:48 am
378113 spacer
>>378112

I didn't say British courts were good, I said they were the best.
>> No. 378114 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 2:02 am
378114 spacer
>>378112
You're a fucking idiot if you think English courts don't compare highly favourably to the vast majority of other systems around the world.
>> No. 378115 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 2:03 am
378115 spacer
>>378114

Oh, okay.
>> No. 378116 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 2:04 am
378116 spacer
>>378115

And what is your response to >>378113 ?
>> No. 378118 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 2:14 am
378118 spacer
Audible mirth.
>> No. 378124 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 7:04 am
378124 spacer
>>378109

Talk about fucking crae crae...dear God, and I fucking think ARE ROLF is likely innocent.
>> No. 378130 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 11:10 am
378130 spacer
In a refreshing display of sanity, one of the Sunday papers today has run with the headline "MOST EVIL MAN IN WORLD", along with a photo of the ISIS leader.
>> No. 378151 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 1:47 pm
378151 spacer
>>378149
We need Chris Morris to come along and declare this Bad Science.
>> No. 378229 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 7:48 pm
378229 spacer
>>378124

Even Vanessa Fucking Feltz has said to have been felt up by ARE ROLF:
http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/harris-assaulted-feltz-and-nolan-1
>> No. 378230 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 7:52 pm
378230 spacer
>>378229
I would.
>> No. 378232 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 8:00 pm
378232 spacer
>>378229
You'd think maybe the time to bring this up might have been last year. Or generally any time prior to his arrest.
>> No. 378233 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 8:05 pm
378233 spacer
>>378229
How dare they call him a paedophile? Raping under-age girls is not the same as paedophilia.
>> No. 378247 Anonymous
6th July 2014
Sunday 8:31 pm
378247 spacer
>>378230

I would too, and I have no idea why. In theory she is repulsive, but there's just something about her.
>> No. 378269 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 1:00 am
378269 spacer
>>378229

She's talking shit. Classic Feltz just jumping on anything to get some attention.
>> No. 378289 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 2:11 am
378289 spacer
>>378269
>just jumping on anything to get some attention

I bet she does, I bet she does! Know what I mean, nudge nudge, wink wink?
>> No. 378318 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 7:14 am
378318 spacer
>>378232
She first revealed she was groped in 2012, but was too scared to name Rolf then.

http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/vanessa-feltz/351029/The-time-I-was-groped-on-live-TV
>> No. 378327 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 10:30 am
378327 spacer
>>378318
With hindsight, maybe she was legally advised not to name him in the article because the fuzz were already looking into him.
>> No. 378332 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 2:08 pm
378332 spacer
>>378327
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-28190812

Thats right.
>> No. 378345 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 6:45 pm
378345 spacer
http://www.youtube.com/v/oYKI_anw-hg
>> No. 378356 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 8:23 pm
378356 spacer
What's going to happen to him inside? Will he get bummed or beaten up at all?
>> No. 378361 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 8:37 pm
378361 spacer
>>378356
He will of course feel something as he's approached from behind, and a voice will ask him if he can tell what it is yet.
>> No. 378364 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 8:58 pm
378364 spacer
>>378356

Not likely. He'll be on a Vulnerable Prisoner Unit, segregated from the rest of the prison population and under constant surveillance. The only people with any real access to him will be the screws (who have seen far worse and are unlikely to want to jeopardise their careers) and other nonces.
>> No. 378365 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 9:02 pm
378365 spacer
>>378356>>378361
I thought prison rape was an American phenomenon and that nonces in UK prisons are more likely to get assaulted than bummed.
>> No. 378371 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 10:34 pm
378371 spacer
>>378356
He will finally feel how he made those kids feel.
>> No. 378375 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 11:12 pm
378375 spacer
Looking back on all this, I suddenly realise that we never did get an answer to the question that was on everyone's lips. What did Stuart Hall do with his brand new shirts?
>> No. 378376 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 11:18 pm
378376 spacer
>>378371
Like he wants to enter into an eleven-year relationship?
>> No. 378379 Anonymous
7th July 2014
Monday 11:27 pm
378379 spacer
>>378377
Depends if you licked your fingers afterwards or not.
>> No. 378431 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 1:45 pm
378431 spacer

ghostnonces.jpg
378431378431378431
When will it end?
>> No. 378436 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 3:29 pm
378436 spacer
>>378375
Ha. Wiped up after his 1970s nonce chums?
>> No. 378474 Anonymous
8th July 2014
Tuesday 10:12 pm
378474 spacer
we need a pedo defense force to defend male rights from the matriarchy
>> No. 379744 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 3:06 pm
379744 spacer
It's a sad day indeed when a beloved icon can't even stick his willy in a few kids.

The modern age... Disgraceful.
>> No. 379752 Anonymous
29th July 2014
Tuesday 4:46 pm
379752 spacer
Learn to tell the difference. It could save your life.

http://www.youtube.com/v/RleE--HDBiU
>> No. 380049 Anonymous
2nd August 2014
Saturday 11:49 am
380049 spacer
It was in the news yesterday that Rolf's going to appeal against the length of his sentence and now it sounds like someone tried to kick his head in.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/paedophile-rolf-harris-caught-up-3950983
>> No. 380052 Anonymous
2nd August 2014
Saturday 12:03 pm
380052 spacer
>>380049
I'm surprised something like that would happen in
>HMP Bullingdon, in Oxfordshire
>> No. 380055 Anonymous
2nd August 2014
Saturday 12:08 pm
380055 spacer
>>380049
That facial hair can't be doing him any favours.
>> No. 380071 Anonymous
2nd August 2014
Saturday 3:08 pm
380071 spacer
Do we still not know exactly what his crimes were? We know he fucked an underage teenage girl but what happened with the 7 year old? It can't have been anything serious given that it took place in public. What did he do? Pinch her bum?
>> No. 380072 Anonymous
2nd August 2014
Saturday 3:14 pm
380072 spacer
>>380071

I heard he tied her up and anus raped her in broad daylight for 3 hours. People just didn't bother reporting until now half a century later.
>> No. 380086 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 1:26 am
380086 spacer
>>380071

I think he just squeezed her arse at a book signing if I remember correctly. To be honest I don't really think it's a big deal if that's he did, maybe something needing at most an apology, but obviously I'm not going to actually tell anyone I know that.
>> No. 380087 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 1:37 am
380087 spacer
>>380086

If that's what he did*, sorry.
>> No. 380090 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 2:50 am
380090 spacer
>>380086

No, groping a 7 year old is not something that "just needs an apology", you fucking dipshit. Such an action is that of a profoundly aggressive and imbalanced individual with no regard for the wellbeing of someone as vulnerable as a pre-adolescent child. You'd be right be right to keep such opinions hidden from public view, as at best you'll look like a completely empty headed maniac, and at worst an apologist for serial sex offenders.
>> No. 380091 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 5:38 am
380091 spacer
>>380090

This is obviously a topic that causes serious emotional stress for you and therefore it is impossible for you to look at this through an unbiased lens, evidenced by your aggressive tone and multiple insults even though I haven't insulted anyone. With this in mind, I can only conclude that it's pointless talking to you because you will never even try to consider my point of view.
>> No. 380092 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 6:36 am
380092 spacer
>>380091

Ha.

"Unbiased lens", what does that even mean? You seem to be condemning my opinions for being opinions, that's something no one anywhere could ever help.

The idea that invading the personal space of a 7 year old girl for your own sexual titillation is an aggression that can be salved over with an apology is insulting. Perhaps not in any personal manner to myself, but to the wider moral and social expectancies of a rational society it is.

Frankly if calling you a "fucking dipshit" has spared myself and .gs at large of anymore of your idiotic ramblings then can only conclude it to be by far the finest choice I made in when conducting my previous post.
>> No. 380095 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 9:55 am
380095 spacer
>>380090

Calm down, Germaine
>> No. 380096 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:08 am
380096 spacer
>>380091

I'm going to throw my toys out of my pram too because someone didn't like something I said!
>> No. 380097 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:20 am
380097 spacer
>>380095

Germaine Greer of course, famously, being one of the few people in the British Isles to take issue with sexual assaults committed against children, err, or something..?
>> No. 380098 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:31 am
380098 spacer
>>380090

Jesus Christ, don't exaggerate. When I was 11 my maths teacher used to touch me up and pinch by bum sometimes. It was pervy and inappropriate but I wouldn't call it "profoundly aggressive" and it hasn't left me traumatised or psychologically damaged. Being chased by rottweilers or pushed around bigger boys was much more traumatising than a little bit of unwanted touching.
>> No. 380104 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 11:46 am
380104 spacer
>>380098
But you had the mental fortitude of a developing man. Girls are more fragile.
>> No. 380105 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 11:59 am
380105 spacer
>>380104

Hey, hey, fucking, hold up there, big dawg. And you >>380098

Oh, you know what, I'm tired and depressed and this is an anonymous image board so nothing I say will matter. But for the record we don't enact laws based on what individuals find tolerable, we enact them on what society deems harmful. While this can end up being a misguided attempt at societal hand holding, but I don't think the "not groping children" laws fall into this category.

And to insinuate in any way that males can't be victimised at an early age by sexual predators is so laughable I'm assuming you were taking the piss.
>> No. 380108 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 12:10 pm
380108 spacer
>>380104
My missus is a secondary teacher. She says that the boys tend to be more fragile and emotional, with their hormones all other the place, while the girls tend to be cold and keep their emotions in check, i.e. nasty calculating bitches.
>> No. 380110 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 1:26 pm
380110 spacer
>>380090
Not him, but that would ultimately depend on how you define groping, and what actually happened on the day in question. At one extreme that hand could have been rammed right up somewhere it had no business being. At the other, some do-gooder could have talked someone into believing that they were abused as a child, and she'd have no way of knowing to the contrary.
>> No. 380111 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 1:37 pm
380111 spacer
>>380110

I'm willing to bet money that it was a casual squeeze whilst he was distracting her.
>> No. 380114 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 1:56 pm
380114 spacer
>>380111
Were that the case, at that age she definitely wouldn't have remembered. Had a parent seen it, they'd have made a complaint there and then. Maybe it's just my cynical side talking - the same one that made me suspicious at how there'd been almost no complaints against Savile in 2012, a couple of dozen after the documentary aired, and suddenly hundreds after the leeching subhuman scum personal injury lawyers appeared on TV saying there might be compo in it.
>> No. 380122 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 7:18 pm
380122 spacer
>>380114
That attitude is fairly common, and there certainly will be people who have made false claims about Savile to cash in, but the reason people come forward in droves after a few high profile cases of people coming forward is so they can avoid victim blaming. Savile's targets in particular were mentally ill or disabled young girls who he had access to in his capacity volunteering at places like Broadmoor. There are records of those girls coming forward at the time, but they weren't believed because of their illness and because of Savile's fame and finances which he used as a tool to win the trust of the higher ups with his charitable donations and volunteering. Savile even boasted of some of his escapades in his autobiography.

I think for the victims who had kept his abuse to themselves for decades (because a lot of sexual abuse victims blame themselves), seeing the documentary showed it wasn't their fault, they weren't the only victims, and it means that people will actually believe the victims instead of dismissing their claims.

Also, it's quite easy remembering things that are significant that happened when you're seven, and one would think being goosed by a celebrity is fairly significant. Obviously the courts have deemed Rolf guilty, and that's fair enough, though I can understand why people have doubts. But with Savile, only truly deluded people continue to maintain his innocence.
>> No. 380125 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 9:29 pm
380125 spacer
>>346596
My friend works in a library, and they pulled all of the Rolf books a week or so ago. She brought one home, "buster fleabags", which on the blurb is meant to be a lovable story about the bond between a man and his pet, a sort of biography that Rolf wrote about his childhood pet. I dipped into it and Jesus fucking christ, how did no one see this coming. There's numerous passages where he basically tortures his dog to the point where the dog starts biting him, and then Rolf suddenly starts cuddling the poor animal and whispering that it'll be alright. Fucking horrible.
>> No. 380126 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 9:36 pm
380126 spacer
>>380125

Of the people who bought or borrowed that book only half actually read it. Of that half a third of them were kids and another third were blindly in love with Rolf's work so couldn't see any negatives about him. The remaining two people probably left a negative review on the Guardian or something, but nobody ever reads those.
>> No. 380127 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 9:43 pm
380127 spacer
>>380125
They pulled all his books? I've never been a fan of the bloke but that seems... extreme. Unless I'm misinterpreting what you said.
>> No. 380131 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:01 pm
380131 spacer
>>380127
Yeah, they just got told to remove all of his books and bin them.

Welcome to Cameron's Britain, year 2k+14.
>> No. 380133 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:08 pm
380133 spacer
>>380131
That's a bit fucked.
>> No. 380134 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:12 pm
380134 spacer
>>380133
To be fair, the demand for children's books written by a convicted paedophile is probably pretty low.
>> No. 380136 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:15 pm
380136 spacer
>>380122
Still, I'd have expected that after two or three turned into a few dozen after the documentary, the others would have come forward shortly thereafter. It still makes me suspicious that weeks afterwards the police say they're looking at 50 cases, some ambulance-chaser goes on that evening's news saying there's money in it, and a couple of days later the police suddenly have another 400 cases on top of that. I can't condone the vicious acts he committed, but equally I can't condone the behaviour of the cunts trying to pick the pockets of various charities and the NHS under the guise of "getting justice for our clients".
>> No. 380137 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:20 pm
380137 spacer

zitat-dies-war-ein-vorspiel-nur-dort-wo-man-bucher.jpg
380137380137380137
>>380131
"That was but a prelude; where they burn books, they will in the end also burn people."
>> No. 380142 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:35 pm
380142 spacer
>>380134
That's not the point.

Just asked a librarian myself:
>Hm. I'd not heard anything but I don't pay much attention to library news. Or read the Daily Mail. Funnily enough, I'd raised the question at work of whether we should remove our copies (not bin, just put in storage) but my colleagues quite correctly pointed out that this was censorship and was I a Nazi? :P
>> No. 380144 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:35 pm
380144 spacer
Removing the kids books of a convicted paedophile is akin to the prelude of the largest European genocide in history, yes, these are fair assessments, you people are not morons of near impossible magnitude.
>> No. 380146 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:39 pm
380146 spacer
>>380144
You know how to use a comma.
>> No. 380147 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:41 pm
380147 spacer
>>380146
n1m8 you put that fookin' cunt right in his place.
>> No. 380148 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:41 pm
380148 spacer
>>380144
Ja Herr Wenger!
>> No. 380149 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:45 pm
380149 spacer
>>380142
No, it's not censorship, because it's not illegal to read, own, buy, sell, publish etc. the works of Rolf Harris.
>> No. 380150 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:48 pm
380150 spacer
>>380149
What if he writes his illustrated memoirs in prison?
>> No. 380151 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:50 pm
380151 spacer
>>380149
You're right, it's just removing them from free public access. It's not the policy of the libraries nationwide however, my librarian friend says
>Some of these middle England old lady librarians might've.
So we can agree that it's not really censorship, but you're acting like an over-sensitive, middle England old lady librarian.
>> No. 380152 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:53 pm
380152 spacer
>>380144
>Heinrich Heine (13 December 1797 – 17 February 1856)
Sorry, you'll have to try a bit harder than that.
>> No. 380153 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:54 pm
380153 spacer
>>380152
What?
>> No. 380154 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 10:58 pm
380154 spacer
>>380137
Is it a prelude when we already have a long and glorious history of burning both books and people?

Libraries have limited shelf space, and they should be prioritising books that people want to read. What parent is going to get their child a book written by a serial sex offender, especially one that features quite a bit of creepy animal torture? I can't believe people are equating this to some kind of NWO censorship assault, leave that sort of shit to the maryqueens ffs
>> No. 380155 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 11:04 pm
380155 spacer
>>380153
I said

Sorry, you'll have to try a bit harder than that. Also, your hearing aid needs fixing.


>> No. 380156 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 11:06 pm
380156 spacer
>>380154
How does the fact that we've done it before make it better?
>Libraries have limited shelf space, and they should be prioritising books that people want to read.
If anything, more people will want to read them now. Not to their children, perhaps, but there's a reason crime is the second most popular genre.
>I can't believe people are equating this to some kind of NWO censorship assault
They're not, you're just over reacting to the internet equivalent of "Uh-oh, that's not great".
>> No. 380157 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 11:09 pm
380157 spacer
>>380155

DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THAT "WHAT?" IN THIS CONTEXT MEANS "WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THAT?" AND NOT "I DIDN'T HEAR YOU"?


>> No. 380158 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 11:11 pm
380158 spacer
>>380154
>What parent is going to get their child a book written by a serial sex offender
If you want to deny your children Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, then so be it. Also, I trust you'll be keeping them away from the computer, what with its existence having depended on the work of a serial sex offender.
>> No. 380159 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 11:13 pm
380159 spacer
>>380155
>>380157
Damn it, the pair of you have blown my hearing aid now.
>> No. 380160 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 11:16 pm
380160 spacer
>>380157
I do. I just didn't think anyone here was special enough to need it explained to them how difficult it might have been for someone to have been foreshadowing the events of WW2 having died some eighty years before it.
>> No. 380161 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 11:18 pm
380161 spacer
>>380158
>Alice's Adventures in Wonderland
Hang on, he was never convicted of anything, and last I heard there were no actual allegations of abuse either (as I understand it, Victorian society was fine with kiddy porn and grooming) and all acounts I've read of his 'friendships' with young girls describe them as chaste.

>computer
Oh, well played. Well played indeed.

Fairly obviously, I'm not the person you're arguing with, but I do think Turing's a damn good card to play and so wanted to congratulate you on it.
>> No. 380162 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 11:20 pm
380162 spacer
>>380160
I don't think you know what foreshadowing means. It's not the same as prophecy.
>> No. 380163 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 11:21 pm
380163 spacer
>>380160
For a start, it turned out he was right. If anything, how much earlier he said it shows it to be true. You do understand that when he's being quoted here, it's not in the context of it foreshadowing WW2 happening again, right? Because that would be nonsensical.
>> No. 380166 Anonymous
3rd August 2014
Sunday 11:49 pm
380166 spacer
>>380163
Of course he was right. He was making an observation based on hindsight. The fact that it would later happen in WW2 just bolsters his point, made as it was in reference to the Great Unexpected burning copies of Moby-Dick.
>> No. 380203 Anonymous
4th August 2014
Monday 3:43 am
380203 spacer
>>380161

>as I understand it, Victorian society was fine with kiddy porn and grooming

So you're telling me the only difference between "child abuse" and "just fine" is whether people think it's okay or not?
>> No. 380207 Anonymous
4th August 2014
Monday 3:55 am
380207 spacer
>>380203
No, I think it's fairly clear from my description of his activities as 'kiddy porn' and 'grooming' rather than talking about harmless photos for aesthetic rather than sexual value and innocent friendships cynically misconstrued that I don't think that. I think Dodgson's relationships with children were dodgy as hell, but I still think it's a weak case to use in an argument because as far as I know there's no evidence of actual abuse or harm suffered (or at least complained of) and it's still theoretically possible it was all innocent - I've not studied the case in any depth, but I don't remember hearing any questions about his sexuality until maybe the nineties, and the fact that he clearly (to me) wanted to do things doesn't mean he actually did them. I suppose I just thought Turing was such a good point that the weakness of Dodgson stood out more and seemed worth arguing with, really.
>> No. 380209 Anonymous
4th August 2014
Monday 4:15 am
380209 spacer
>>380207

I'm sorry, I'm arguing with you even though I agree with you. I think that there is a great innocence and beauty in a child's body (the victorians called it the cult of the child) and it's a shame they're sexualized instantly nowadays, but that's just a byproduct of the ongoing sexual revolution. We should probably get off this topic of discussion to be honest.
>> No. 380210 Anonymous
4th August 2014
Monday 4:24 am
380210 spacer
>>380209
No harm done, amicable late night bickering is one of the reasons I come here, but you're right, we should. Do you want to go back to Libraries pulling books by nonces or onwards to pastures new?
>> No. 380212 Anonymous
4th August 2014
Monday 10:14 am
380212 spacer
The funny thing about the whole Turing story is how little people know nowadays. We get the persistent myth that his conviction was the result of gay-bashing, when in actual fact it was an act of retaliation. The young man he was with was known to the police and Turing provided a false alibi for him. The police suspected this but couldn't prove it, and so leant on the lad to secure the eventual conviction for what was ultimately an offence of convenience. That's before you think about the boys in Luton.
>> No. 380311 Anonymous
6th August 2014
Wednesday 11:51 am
380311 spacer
>>364988

I wonder if it happened in rhaploch. Stirling's a weird place, I lived opposite a medieval church and the castle and 5 minutes in one direction took you to a park and million pound victorian houses. Five minutes in the opposite direction takes you through one of the most deprived schemes in scotland.
>> No. 380313 Anonymous
6th August 2014
Wednesday 6:39 pm
380313 spacer
>>380311

Paedophilia is a classless crime, so I'm not sure of the significance of that.

You are correct, in that Stirling is a weird place. It gets its water from a different resevoir than the rest of Stirlingshire. Another town that is weird, I suspect because of this, is Whitburn.

I've never seen such rampant sectarian bigotry and blind allegiance to the Queen and the Orange lodge than in Whitburn, not even in the 6 months I lived in NI. It was surreal, their local flute bands walk in the childrens Galaday and play songs like the sectarian "Famine Song" while everyone cheers and waves.

Incase you are curious: http://youtu.be/e-Htn6rR0a4
>> No. 380325 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 10:01 am
380325 spacer
>>380313



I wouldn't agree it's completely classless, the vast majority of arrested paedophiles are from working-class backgrounds with a strong link to disrupted or abused childhoods (also a strong link to left-handedness, bizarrely because handedness has nothing to do with development and personality). Not exclusively of course, and perhaps the recent revelations are going to prove that middle class offenders are just more adept at silencing victims (up until now and the new culture).

Someone else said it earlier in this massive thread but it's tragic how little attention is given in the media to rehabilitation and understanding of this condition. It's just kneejerk venom, without any mention of research or study. The two louis theroux documentaries on convicted sex offenders are excellent.

On the subject of northern ireland, I was born there before moving to scotland after Uni and outside of certain flashpoints like ardoyne in marching season, nothing i grew up with was remotely as bad as glasgow on a sunday during an old firm game. I heard a possibly apocryphal story about subway withdrawing from some tiny town around glasgow too because their green theme meant they kept getting vandalized. No zealot like a converted one
>> No. 380327 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 3:45 pm
380327 spacer
>>380325

The vast majority of arrested anyone are working class.
>> No. 380331 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 6:35 pm
380331 spacer
>>380327
The scruffy oiks...
>> No. 380335 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 8:30 pm
380335 spacer
>>380325

I've always believed that the same rough % of people in any given class are criminals, it's just that the higher your class the more likely you are to have a good education or be intelligent, and as a result you're more likely to know how to cover up your crime.
>> No. 380336 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 9:40 pm
380336 spacer
>>380335
>the higher your class the more likely you are to... be intelligent
Steady on there, Francis Galton.
>> No. 380337 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 9:43 pm
380337 spacer
>>380336

I wouldn't go that far. I think he just has a naive notion of what makes you middle or upper class.
>> No. 380338 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 9:51 pm
380338 spacer
>>380336
You're more likely to be educated better by virtue of being able to afford private schooling etc. Whether there is any correlation with base IQ is arguable either way.
>> No. 380339 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 10:02 pm
380339 spacer
>>380338
>Whether there is any correlation with base IQ is arguable either way.
I think it's likely that there is going to be a higher IQ in the middle classes at least due to parents being pushy and getting kids to confront more problems and situations. I think it might regress a bit in the upper classes as people become complacent about their future.

This is wank discussion though, not least because IQ is a silly measurement.
>> No. 380340 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 10:03 pm
380340 spacer
And don't forget that going back a few decades with your local senior police officer/MP/other influential whoevers is probably a bit of a hand.
>> No. 380341 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 10:05 pm
380341 spacer
>>380339
Is IQ affected by your upbringing? I always thought it was just genetic but I don't really know.
>> No. 380342 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 10:20 pm
380342 spacer
>>380341
I'm sure it is. There will be a genetic factor linked to problem solving but it'll also be environmental.

I imagine that it's impossible to reliably measure genetic intelligence.
>> No. 380343 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 10:24 pm
380343 spacer
>>380342

>I imagine that it's impossible to reliably measure genetic intelligence.
Sort of. They did a fair few studies on this on homozygous twins in the 60s/70s when the twins were adopted by different people. I think the IQ difference overall was something like 4 points.

Obviously studies from the 60s/70s will be flawed in various ways (e.g. type of people who were allowed to adopt, how intelligence was measured, kind of people who were put up for adoption), and can't be repeated today because we actually have social consciences.
>> No. 380344 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 10:27 pm
380344 spacer
>>380343
Why would repeating such a study be unethical? Isn't it just sticking an IQ test in front of two people?
>> No. 380345 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 10:29 pm
380345 spacer
>>380344

It's more to do with separating identical twins at birth. As far as I know that doesn't happen anymore. Even if it did, gathering data on people who were unable to give informed consent (<16) would be a big no no and ineligible for publication.
>> No. 380346 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 10:46 pm
380346 spacer
>>380345
Which is why no-one ever does any studies on children.
>> No. 380347 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 10:48 pm
380347 spacer
>>380346

Parental consent is not the same as guardium lightum consent.
>> No. 380348 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 10:55 pm
380348 spacer
The studies which show IQ increasing across the board (the Flynn effect) are fascinating, I'd really love to know why that's happening/happened.
>> No. 380350 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 10:58 pm
380350 spacer
>>380348

The most plausible explanations are that nutrition has improved across the board, and that modern life provides far more intellectual stimulation and is more mentally demanding.
>> No. 380351 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 11:01 pm
380351 spacer
>>380347
Why?
>> No. 380352 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 11:01 pm
380352 spacer
>>380350
Those are good explanations but I want objectivity, damn it. Give me impossible knowledge.
>> No. 380353 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 11:03 pm
380353 spacer
>>380351

Because parents are deemed entirely responsible for their wards while guardians are deemed responsible only for their wards' preservation.
>> No. 380354 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 11:08 pm
380354 spacer
>>380353
That doesn't sound like there's any difference.
>> No. 380355 Anonymous
7th August 2014
Thursday 11:19 pm
380355 spacer
>>380354

Parents have full legal responsibility over a child as if they were an adult extension of themselves. Guardian Ad Litems (I was wrong in my first post) can only defend the possession of negative rights of the child. I don't know how to make it any clearer. Use google and let me know what you find.
>> No. 380358 Anonymous
8th August 2014
Friday 12:20 am
380358 spacer
>>380355
What I find is that under the Children Act 1989 legal guardians to a child hold parental responsibility identical to that of a parent. The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate there is any difference in law.
>> No. 380359 Anonymous
8th August 2014
Friday 12:26 am
380359 spacer
>>380358

Having been under the care of a guardian ad litem and having been told so when I asked why I couldn't have done various things, including joining the Naval Cadets.
>> No. 380360 Anonymous
8th August 2014
Friday 12:37 am
380360 spacer
>>380359
Ad litems are to represent kids in court. Who had parental responsibility for you? If you were in care then it would have been the local authority. And that's a completely different situation to adopted twins so I don't know why you're relating it to that.
>> No. 380361 Anonymous
8th August 2014
Friday 12:43 am
380361 spacer
>>380360

When I was in care at about 7-8 I was told that ad litems can't give positive consent for something. If someone was in care I would assume it would be the same as it was for me.
>> No. 380366 Anonymous
8th August 2014
Friday 8:19 am
380366 spacer
>>380359
A guardian ad litem is not a legal guardian. The powers of a LG are more wide-ranging than a GAL.
>> No. 380373 Anonymous
8th August 2014
Friday 4:46 pm
380373 spacer
>>380361
But we're not talking about children in care. We're talking about children who have been adopted.
>They did a fair few studies on this on homozygous twins in the 60s/70s when the twins were adopted by different people
>> No. 380448 Anonymous
10th August 2014
Sunday 2:58 pm
380448 spacer
Was in the chemist's the other day and realised that one of the most prolific paedophiles is still hiding in plain sight and is so innocent looking, he has yet to be collared by Yewtree.

Who has been fooling unsuspecting parents into bringing him into the family home for decades, with his friendly demeanour and fun costumes? Who has been there at millions of kids' bathtimes, either sat on the side of the bath, watching and grinning, or actually playing in the bath with the child?

That's right.

Matey
>> No. 380449 Anonymous
10th August 2014
Sunday 3:44 pm
380449 spacer
>>380448
Somebody should design a special commemorative .gs bottle of Ladm8y.
>> No. 380611 Anonymous
13th August 2014
Wednesday 6:07 pm
380611 spacer
>>380313
For the victims its not necessarily classless. Examples like Cyril Smith and the North Wales care home scandals involved kids in care being used and abused by paedophiles, almost as if they were slaves. These kids are on the bottom rung societally, having damn near nobody who is concerned for their wellbeing and can protect them (that is the job of the care home staff, but if they're bent then the kids are buggered). You're right that absolutely any young person, regardless of class, can be a victim of paedophilia, but children in care remain a group who are especially vulnerable by virtue of their circumstances.
>> No. 380612 Anonymous
13th August 2014
Wednesday 6:15 pm
380612 spacer
>>380611
>if they're bent then the kids are buggered
Quite often both figuratively and literally.
>> No. 380629 Anonymous
13th August 2014
Wednesday 11:27 pm
380629 spacer
Here comes the spin lads.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/10950998/Should-I-be-worried-about-how-I-behaved-in-the-1970s.html

Something very different from what went on in Kincora and Jersey.
>> No. 380631 Anonymous
13th August 2014
Wednesday 11:35 pm
380631 spacer
>>380629
What a cunt. Especially this:
>I do know, for certain, of one household name of almost saintly respectability from the Seventies and Eighties – a direct contemporary of Savile, Hall and Harris and equally well-known - who is lucky to be dead because, if his history of grooming under-age girls were to be dug up, he would certainly have found himself in the stocks of a tabloid pelting if not the handcuffs of the bizzies.

If he knows something he should speak up. He's knowingly withholding justice and recognition for the victims and evidence from the investigators.
>> No. 380632 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 12:55 am
380632 spacer
>>380203
Broadly that should be how the law works in a representative democracy.

>He's knowingly withholding justice and recognition for the victims
Up to him, as far as the law is concerned, at least unless it can be classified as aiding and abetting.

> and evidence from the investigators.
If evidence can be found to contradict him and he's called to testify then he's legally obliged to... Oblige. That's the nature of our law however, evidence must be found to prosecute, not the other way around.
>> No. 380640 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 1:05 pm
380640 spacer
Someone at work has just told me they're searching Cliff Richards' house as part of Yes Tree.
>> No. 380641 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 1:13 pm
380641 spacer
>>380640
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-28790718

>The search is not connected to Operation Yewtree, police said.
>> No. 380643 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 1:54 pm
380643 spacer
>>380640

Confirmed.

http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/sir-cliff-richards-uk-home-searched-over-historic-sex-allegation
>> No. 380644 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 2:02 pm
380644 spacer
Funny isn't it how Cliff upped and left to live in Barbados which currently has no extradition treaty with the UK.....
>> No. 380645 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 2:05 pm
380645 spacer
Has anyone made a 'Bummer Holiday' joke yet?
>> No. 380646 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 2:05 pm
380646 spacer

Cliff Richard The Young Ones youngones2.jpg
380646380646380646
CLIFF WRICHARD!!
>> No. 380647 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 2:13 pm
380647 spacer
Given that so many men commit these type of offenses we need to change the way we think about the offenders. Instead of viewing them as deviants and perverts we need to accept (as many societies have such as ancient Greece etc) that men simply like 'em young and will often give into the temptation.

Sage for incoming ban.
>> No. 380649 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 2:37 pm
380649 spacer
>>380647
Nah m8, I don't think we do.
>> No. 380650 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 2:50 pm
380650 spacer
>>380647
It's a slippery slope if we go down that route. The laws around age of consent and whatnot are perhaps a bit too rigid in certain cases, with girls maturing faster than boys, but that is only really something that needs looking at in the cases of teenagers dating/fucking someone a couple of years younger than them (but still a reasonable enough age to have the maturity to make sensible decisions).

But stuff like with Savile and all these other celebrities and politicians, where 50+ year old men are shagging 14 year olds or younger, that is in no way acceptable. Particularly in cases like with Sir Cyril Smith, as not only did he target underage boys, he targeted the most vulnerable people in society with his access to care homes, as did Savile with his access to various hospitals and psychiatric wards.
>> No. 380651 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 2:53 pm
380651 spacer
>>380650
Don't encourage him.
>> No. 380654 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 3:17 pm
380654 spacer
>>380650

>where 50+ year old men are shagging 14 year olds or younger

That isn't the case though. These are historical offences. Most of these allegations took place in the 70s or 80s, when these performers were not old men in their fifties and upwards. They were young men in their prime.

It's still an abuse of power but frankly it staggers me people are naive enough to think it doesn't happen, and it baffles mehow peopl are assuming the victims are always totally innocent themselves, like a celebrity jumped out of the bushes and threw them in a sack to take home and rape.

Have you ever been to a pop-punk gig, for example? My Chemical Romance, Greenday, that sort of thing. Those guys are knee deep in tender teenage gash, and frankly, you can't blame them for having a piece. Someone like Ian Watkins was an outlier and total sicko in his own right, not the sort who just got a blowie off a young groupie, and lets face it, that's all this kerfuffle is about.

http://www.youtube.com/v/PD3EAsYACZ4
>> No. 380655 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 3:20 pm
380655 spacer
>>380654
Discuss the case, not the morality of kiddy fiddling, or this thread will be locked.
>> No. 380656 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 3:27 pm
380656 spacer
>>380654
>it baffles mehow peopl are assuming the victims are always totally innocent themselves

You're really not that up on the definition of the word "victim", are you?

I'm not even sure why I'm engaging you. I predict you're about 3 posts away from "being sexually attracted to 12 year old girls is natural and healthy". 50p says you're banned by 12am.
>> No. 380657 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 3:31 pm
380657 spacer
>>380655

Soz boss.

>>380656

No, hardly. Like I said it's still wrong, but all I was suggesting is that it's not like there aren't cases of young lasses going for older blokes. Especially famous, rich older blokes.
>> No. 380658 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 4:11 pm
380658 spacer
>>380647
Let's not forget that when we expected that Operation Ore would catch mostly disgusting monsters, what we actually got was a bunch of normal people who hadn't harmed a hair on a child's head. Maybe our expectations are wrong, maybe our approach is wrong. More than likely both. As someone else has said, in some cases the 'victims' aren't entirely blameless. If a 15 year old is throwing themselves at their idol, then one has to question whether they're really a victim at all. We certainly shouldn't be putting such cases on a par with some of the horrific things that people like Savile were doing to unwilling individuals. Fucking kids in care homes is beyond the pale.
>> No. 380659 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 4:15 pm
380659 spacer
I was recently listening to some interview by a guy who was in charge of NAYPIC in the 80s (National Association of Young People in Care), talking about the sexual abuses of kids at the elm guest house by famous people that his charity was trying to out. He mentioned Cliff and said something like "We know that Cliff Richard was there with his (male) partner and engaged in gay sex with adults but I have no knowledge of him being involved in child abuse". This guy seemed clued up but seems even he was wrong on that front a ITV said Cliff's alleged offence involved sexual abuse of a boy younger than 16.
>> No. 380660 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 4:24 pm
380660 spacer
>>380659

This one says it's a 10-year-old but it's not the most authoritative site I've ever seen.

https://web.archive.org/web/20140716150156/http://theduckshoot.com/is-the-73-year-old-arrested-in-yewtree-investigation-cliff-richard/
>> No. 380661 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 4:38 pm
380661 spacer
So Cliff has come forward, acknowledged the rumours and is adamant that the allegations are false. Just like Stuart Hall and DLT.
>> No. 380662 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 4:42 pm
380662 spacer
>>380660
Yeah some of the information in there doesn't seem right, perhaps because it was an early article and things will become clearer as more info is released. The headline says Yewtree when we now know it's unconnected to operation Yewtree. If this is to do with the Elm Guest House then the Met Police investigation into that is called Operation Fairbank.

However he could be right about the age, other sources said under 16 so I suppose people do know the age.
>> No. 380663 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 4:45 pm
380663 spacer
>>380660
>The Mirror can reveal that the man is a former BBC employee who is not believed to be a household name.

You're an idiot.
>> No. 380664 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 4:46 pm
380664 spacer
>>380662
It's now being reported that the alleged incident happened during an event connected with the visit of well-known American evangelist Billy Graham. Sweepstake on how long it is before there's some reference to paedophile priests? I've got 20p on 6:30 tonight.
>> No. 380665 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 4:48 pm
380665 spacer
>>380663
I bet it didn't even occur to him that there might be another 73 year old somewhere in Britain.
>> No. 380666 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 4:55 pm
380666 spacer
>>380665
Arrested by Operation Yewtree officers in April? Nope, just Chris Denning. I guess it didn't occur to you to find out why he's using an archived link. It's because the aimless speculation gave way to actual facts.
http://theduckshoot.com/is-the-73-year-old-arrested-in-yewtree-investigation-cliff-richard/
>> No. 380667 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 4:57 pm
380667 spacer
>>380666
>Arrested by Operation Yewtree officers in April?
No, just in general.

>I guess it didn't occur to you to find out why he's using an archived link
I had no idea the author of that blog was using an archived link. Indeed, were I in his shoes, I probably wouldn't have published an archived link to a story in which I falsely imply someone has been arrested in relation to Yewtree.
>> No. 380668 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 5:01 pm
380668 spacer
>>380666
So it's not because the site currently refuses to give me anything other than:
>Error establishing a database connection
>> No. 380669 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 5:03 pm
380669 spacer
>>380663
>>380665
>>380666
>>380667

I used an archived link because I was looking at that site a few hours ago but when I came back to it to get the link, it wouldn't load. It's fine now so I guess it was down briefly.

I didn't notice the archive version was different. The current version's sentence

>A man has come forward to accuse Richard of abuse when he was just 10 years old.

was what I was referring to.
>> No. 380671 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 5:07 pm
380671 spacer
>>380668

It's going up and down I guess. It's probably receiving a lot of extra traffic in light of today's news stories.
>> No. 380681 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 7:31 pm
380681 spacer
Someone should make a Cliff Richards edition of this thread, and then wait until next year to see the shopping list of lurid filth flood in.

MARK MA WURDS.
>> No. 380682 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 7:59 pm
380682 spacer
Is this the longest lasting thread ever on /b/?
>> No. 380691 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 10:29 pm
380691 spacer
>>380681
>Someone should make a Cliff Richards edition

Bruce Forsyth surely
>> No. 380693 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 11:36 pm
380693 spacer
>>380691

Noel Edmonds
>> No. 380694 Anonymous
14th August 2014
Thursday 11:57 pm
380694 spacer
>>380691>>380693
Steady on, as you see it's a queue system. I bet Forsyth will be on a ventilator when they accuse of his noncing crimes.
>> No. 380695 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 12:03 am
380695 spacer
>>380694
Let's be fair, relatively speaking him being on the same stage as Tess Daly amounts to noncery. He must be at least 80 times her age by now.
>> No. 380696 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 12:18 am
380696 spacer

michael-morning.jpg
380696380696380696
>>380641

Which conflicts with initial reports that a 73 year old pop star was resulted in conjunction with Yewtree.

>>380647

With regards to Cliff, it's better to hold off judgement until you hear the details of the crimes. But with Savile remember that he was a necrophile, and many of the living victims that he targeted were in care, in trouble with the law, had mental health problems or were retarded. This is very different from a creepy old famous dude having intercourse with a star struck adolescent.

When the most powerful people in a society abuse the most vulnerable, there is a big problem.

This is to say nothing of the intelligence communities strategy of placing nonces in positions of power and using their vices as blackmail to control them. This compromises the stability of society as a whole, and with the increasing availability of information means that it cannot continue. The establishment's response has been to curtrail freedom of speech and control the flow of information on the internet. It goes without saying what the results of this approach have been in the past (Stalinist Russia, Nazi Germany etc.)

>>380654

Look into the story of Ben Fellows and the role that David Cameron played in this. It's not as historical as you'd like to believe.

>>380691
>>380693
Do you have any sources regarding Edmonds and Forsyth or are you being facetious? I've not seen anything regarding these guys yet.

I care more about the politicians noncing that the celebrities as these guys are the one supposed to be running the country whilst they have their cocks in the mouths of infants.
>> No. 380697 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 12:19 am
380697 spacer
>>380691

Brucie is actually on the list. They just don't have enough evidence to present yet.
>> No. 380698 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 12:20 am
380698 spacer
Also, the some aspect of the intelligence community is obviously aware of this thread.

I would appeal to you to do the right thing before this turns into something worse.

You can't hoodwink the public forever.

We don't want another Robespierre.
>> No. 380699 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 12:21 am
380699 spacer
>>380697
Source?

>>380698
Won't work. You haven't included any trigger words.
>> No. 380700 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 12:23 am
380700 spacer
>>380698
>Also, the some aspect of the intelligence community is obviously aware of this thread.
What? There's nothing being discussed in this thread that isn't openly available to the public. I bet it's being discussed elsewhere too.
>> No. 380701 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 12:24 am
380701 spacer
>>380696
>When the most powerful people in a society abuse the most vulnerable, there is a big problem.
Big words, little meaning.

>This is to say nothing of the intelligence communities strategy of placing nonces in positions of power and using their vices as blackmail to control them
>The establishment's response has been to curtrail freedom of speech and control the flow of information on the internet
Do you have anything to back that up, Mr. Icke?
>> No. 380702 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 12:33 am
380702 spacer
>>380698
>We don't want another Robespierre.
Is there a real risk of us electing one?
>> No. 380703 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 12:57 am
380703 spacer

page7-372px-The_War_That_Will_End_War_-_Wells.djvu.jpg
380703380703380703
>>380702
Because if history tells us one thing, it is that nothing is ever repeated.
>> No. 380704 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 1:00 am
380704 spacer
>>380703
Well shit, I'd better build myself a bunker ready for when a meteor comes to wipe us out like the dinosaurs.
>> No. 380705 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 1:02 am
380705 spacer
When the fuck are they going to investigate the royals? Never. That's fucking when.
>> No. 380706 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 1:10 am
380706 spacer
>>380705
Why would they want or need to investigate the royals?
>> No. 380707 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 1:11 am
380707 spacer
>>380703
Have you considered maybe answering the question?
>> No. 380708 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 1:13 am
380708 spacer
>>380706

Prince Charles was apparently caught by Diana fucking a teenage boy while they were still married.
>> No. 380709 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 1:14 am
380709 spacer
>>380708
Except he wasn't, was he?
>> No. 380710 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 1:16 am
380710 spacer
>>380707
How's clearing going, dulllad?
>> No. 380711 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 1:17 am
380711 spacer
>>380710
u wot m8?
>> No. 380712 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 1:47 am
380712 spacer
>>380709

Allegedly, yes he was.
>> No. 380713 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 1:50 am
380713 spacer
>>380712
Meanwhile, back in the reality where we're not ruled over by blood-drinking lizards ...
>> No. 380714 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 1:55 am
380714 spacer

48764.justice3.jpg
380714380714380714
>>380699

Trigger words such as?

>>380700
And they'll be lugging in on those discussions too ladmate.

>>380701
For the 2nd greentext statement. it's included in some of the videos previously linked in this thread. Here are some additional sources.
http://www.youtube.com/v/dU4wfVI7LNc
http://theneedleblog.wordpress.com/2013/05/03/ken-livingstone-on-kincora/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-28597343

for the 3rd
http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2014-15/dataretentionandinvestigatorypowers.html
http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/opinion/security/3536363/drip-why-surveillance-bill-is-bad-news/

And what is this Icke of which you speak? Only Icke I know is Robert Icke, director of Unthank's adaptation of 1984 http://citz.co.uk/whatson/info/nineteen_eighty_four/

>>380702
give it time. but remember you read this.

>>380713
Best case scenario Pedogeddon results in the ousting of the monarchy, worst case scenario it will result in the installation of totalitarianism in Britain. Probably something will happen in between.

>>380713
The Icke defense is invalid, thou art either hoodwinked or a spook.
>> No. 380715 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 1:57 am
380715 spacer
This thread (and the Boo thread) should probably be archived and a new one started.

My shitty processor is struggling to cope with the +1000 posts.
>> No. 380716 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 2:03 am
380716 spacer
>>380714
Of ten marks available, I award you nonce. Your sources don't even begin to support your claims.
>> No. 380717 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 2:12 am
380717 spacer
>>380716

How well stocked are the vending machines in Benhall GCHQlad?
>> No. 380718 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 2:18 am
380718 spacer
>>380717
>Shit, my bullshit isn't working! I know, I'll just accuse him of being from GCHQ, that can't possibly fail!
Go to bed, David.
>> No. 380719 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 2:18 am
380719 spacer
>>380681
>Someone should make a Cliff Richards edition of this thread, and then wait until next year to see the shopping list of lurid filth flood in.

>MARK MA WURDS.
Looks like it will be sooner than that.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/sir-cliff-richard-expected-quizzed-4049592
>> No. 380720 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 2:28 am
380720 spacer
>>380715
>My shitty processor is struggling to cope with the +1000 posts.
Click the link that says "Last 50 posts" instead then.
>> No. 380721 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 2:38 am
380721 spacer
>>380720
Not him, but we could definitely do with a new thread. This one is a year old, has over 1500 posts, and (most importantly) the OP somehow failed to spell "Rolf" correctly.
>> No. 380722 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 3:16 am
380722 spacer
>>380718

So do you think that Ken Livingstone is lying in the video I linked when he refers to MI5 filming politicians a noncing for blackmail purposes, or do you think that he's misinformed, or do you think he is telling the truth?

I'm not going to argue with you. But how about dissecting the points I raised and telling me why they're wrong as opposed to simply dismissing them and accusing me of believing in reptilian aliens?

I smirk at your ad hominem attack.

Debate me motherfucker.
>> No. 380723 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 9:32 am
380723 spacer

no.jpg
380723380723380723
>>380722

I don't think he will debate you chap. Not part of his remit.

I wish the old GCHQlad would return. This new lad is a bit shit if I'm honest. He definately can't handle the banter. Where are you old GCHQlad?
>> No. 380724 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 9:55 am
380724 spacer
>>380723

He was sent to prison by a military court for a crime he didn't commit. Legend has it that if you have a problem...
>> No. 380725 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 10:13 am
380725 spacer
>>380724
> Legend has it that if you have a problem...
Er, I'm a serving politician who buggered 629 boys in the eighties, and it turns out those silly sods at head office forgot to murder one of them. Could you be a dear?
>> No. 380730 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 11:20 am
380730 spacer
>>380723>>380724

I heard purple turned him.

Yes that kind.
>> No. 380731 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 12:01 pm
380731 spacer
>>380722
>But how about dissecting the points I raised and telling me why they're wrong as opposed to simply dismissing them and accusing me of believing in reptilian aliens?
Really?

You said:
>the intelligence communities strategy of placing nonces in positions of power

Ken said:
>They were hoping to catch one of Ian Paisley's MPs - and they never did
Implication of actively placing nonces: nil.

You said:
>The establishment's response has been to [...] control the flow of information on the internet
Your evidence: DRIP. Support for your argument: nil.

In summary, fuck off to /boo/ with your bollocks.
>> No. 380738 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 1:22 pm
380738 spacer
>>380731

>Ken said:
>They were hoping to catch one of Ian Paisley's MPs - and they >never did
>Implication of actively placing nonces: nil.

They may have never charged him, but whose to say that evidence wasn't obtained for the purposes of blackmail? Blackmailing MPs in jail is kind of useless.

You're totally right though, I agree, no implication at all. And I agree that this incident is unrelated to what went on with Cyril Smith and are Cliff Richards at Elm Guest House, I mean it's not like members of MI5 and politicians were on the list. And the Sandvoort child porn dump they found in Holland wasn't filmed in the dungeon below Haut de la Garenne in Jersey.

away and tell your handler that the peons aren't as peonous as they have been previously you GCHQ creep.
>> No. 380739 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 1:34 pm
380739 spacer
>>380738
>They may have never charged him, but whose to say that evidence wasn't obtained for the purposes of blackmail?
You might want to work on your reading comprehension there, lad. Ken is saying that they tried to get blackmail material and failed.

>You're totally right though, I agree, no implication at all.
Absolutely correct. Clear implications that they tried to get blackmail material, but no implication that they actively placed people in those positions in the hope of blackmailing them later. I trust even Icketards can understand things this basic.
>> No. 380740 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 1:36 pm
380740 spacer
>>380738
Not the guy you're arguing with, but seriously, fuck off to /x/ on funchan you tedious cunt.
>> No. 380741 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 1:41 pm
380741 spacer

_55587426_savile1_bodybbc[1].jpg
380741380741380741
>>380724
I love it when a plan comes together
>> No. 380747 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 4:15 pm
380747 spacer
Why do you think they were called Cliff Richard and THE SHADOWS? they were being brazen about belonging to a SHADOW organisation that goes around diddling little boy's arseholes. Talk about hiding in plain sight.
>> No. 380748 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 4:27 pm
380748 spacer
>>380747
My God, that guy in the /boo/ thread was right. Hank Marvin was in on it all along.
>> No. 380749 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 5:00 pm
380749 spacer
>>380748

This could be the end lads... They might have to pull that Fridge Raiders/Hank Marvin advert off the telly!
>> No. 380752 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 5:12 pm
380752 spacer
I'm never really surprised when a member of the ultra religious is found out like this. He was practically a priest. In more ways than was previously known.
>> No. 380760 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 7:35 pm
380760 spacer
>>380749

I fucking hope so. I hate those adverts.
>> No. 380761 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 7:37 pm
380761 spacer
>>380760
BRAVE BONES FUCK CUNT
>> No. 380790 Anonymous
16th August 2014
Saturday 7:20 pm
380790 spacer
>>380761

Calm down, lad. Drink your Lambrini.
>> No. 380791 Anonymous
16th August 2014
Saturday 7:38 pm
380791 spacer
>>380790

He's just angry because he's lactose intolerant.
>> No. 380994 Anonymous
19th August 2014
Tuesday 10:10 pm
380994 spacer

Oompa_Loompas__1750522a-530x556.jpg
380994380994380994
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jailed-paedophile-rolf-harris-nicknamed-4073033

I would have thought he'd be put in the sex offenders wing for his own safety. Isn't it that simple?
>> No. 380995 Anonymous
19th August 2014
Tuesday 10:50 pm
380995 spacer
>>380994
Rolf didn't really sex offend anyone, he just likes a cuddle and a squeeze.
>> No. 381052 Anonymous
21st August 2014
Thursday 12:15 am
381052 spacer
>>380995

Given that Jim'll was a necro and animals can't testify in court I'm watching Animal Hospital in a whole new light I tell you whut.

http://www.youtube.com/v/2Zail7Gdqro
>> No. 381054 Anonymous
21st August 2014
Thursday 12:26 am
381054 spacer
>>381052

http://www.youtube.com/v/3US5J8gDFQ
>> No. 381055 Anonymous
21st August 2014
Thursday 12:28 am
381055 spacer
>>381054

http://www.youtube.com/v/-3US5J8gDFQ even
>> No. 381056 Anonymous
21st August 2014
Thursday 12:36 am
381056 spacer
http://www.youtube.com/v/oodFPVdjNZ0
>> No. 381096 Anonymous
21st August 2014
Thursday 9:31 pm
381096 spacer

roywalker-2331.jpg
381096381096381096
I hope Roy Walker isn't next.
>> No. 381097 Anonymous
21st August 2014
Thursday 9:33 pm
381097 spacer
>>381096

You're close but you're not right.
>> No. 381098 Anonymous
21st August 2014
Thursday 9:47 pm
381098 spacer
>>381056

http://www.youtube.com/v/e01J3Hz9yoo
>> No. 381104 Anonymous
22nd August 2014
Friday 2:17 am
381104 spacer
>>381097>>381096
Just say what you see.
>> No. 381471 Anonymous
25th August 2014
Monday 6:54 am
381471 spacer
>>381056

Ho ho ho. Rolf's walking on eggshells. I wonder which ring he kissed?
>> No. 381476 Anonymous
25th August 2014
Monday 11:55 am
381476 spacer
>>381055
Diabetic? It's a cat! Just let it eat whatever it wants and when it dies it dies or put it down if it's suffering. Life expectancy in the wild is only a few years anyway.

5 people just to take a blood test? Jesus Christ. At what point do you say "this isn't worth the fuss for a fucking cat"?
>> No. 381480 Anonymous
25th August 2014
Monday 1:23 pm
381480 spacer
>>381476
People get emotionally attached to animals, and they can bring a lot of joy into people's lives, so people will do quite a lot to avoid something they care about dying earlier than it needs to. And the woman in that video seems pretty old, so that cat is likely one of her closest companions. You wouldn't let a friend die if you had ways to prevent their death, would you?
>> No. 381484 Anonymous
25th August 2014
Monday 2:39 pm
381484 spacer
>>381476

I have a vet colleague who recently travelled south of the wall to Londontown in order to find out about using viral gene therapy to treat a dog.

I have a friend who spent £500 to treat their sick rabbit.

You wouldn't believe the lengths some people go to to look after their pets. I would say that it was nice if human beings weren't currently dying of AIDS and malaria elsewhere in the world.
>> No. 381506 Anonymous
25th August 2014
Monday 5:35 pm
381506 spacer
>>381484

The idea that humans are inherently more valuable doesn't compute with me, as people attribute worth to things based on how much they care for them be it a cause, a person or a pet.

The question it raises is, why should they care more about a Human they don't know that is dying from malaria more than the pet they've had for 10 years and are directly responsible for the care of?

I don't think they should. Magnanimity and generalised altruism is a virtue not everyone has or even has the capability of expressing. That doesn't undermine the things they can and choose to care about, though. When people do this for their pets they are expressing the same type of kin selection and altruistic response they would show towards a child, as often pets act as surrogates or take that role.

It's a perfectly natural response.
>> No. 381509 Anonymous
25th August 2014
Monday 6:09 pm
381509 spacer
>>381506

Yeah, I don't fully disagree with you. But I am a human chauvanist pig.

Also the gene therapy thing is actually for the betterment of man in the long run as the obstacles to get treatments to clinic in animals are less in non human persons than in humans. Meaning that medical researchers can learn from progress here via the use of lateral thinking. Or summat.
>> No. 381511 Anonymous
25th August 2014
Monday 6:28 pm
381511 spacer

jkjkuij1.jpg
381511381511381511
>>381509
This is true. Of course a lot of new treatments do still go through the same process whether or not they're used on pet animals, but it means a lot of treatments get out of the lab and into the real world sooner. It does also have the knock-on effect of reducing costs when treatments do eventually reach humans, as the manufacturing process is scaled up to commercial levels many years sooner.

A good case is Oscar the cat. His prosthetic legs are attached to pegs surgically implanted into his bone specially modified so that the skin grows into it instead of forming scar tissue around it. Apparently this cost in the region of £50K, but in the next few decades, surgically implanted prosthetics such as these will replace artificial limbs that are simply strapped onto a stump for humans.
>> No. 381512 Anonymous
25th August 2014
Monday 6:39 pm
381512 spacer
>>381511

Eventually it'll all be 'Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?'.
>> No. 381513 Anonymous
25th August 2014
Monday 8:17 pm
381513 spacer
My cat died a couple of years ago from old age. He was about 18 ish and had taken a battering from our younger cat.

Loved that ginger bastard but in his final moments he sat in a basket and whimpered for an hour before he died. So we drive up to the vet as we didn't know how you dispose of a dead cat's body and he gave us two choices. For £10 they can dispose of it in the incinerator oven or for £150 we can get his ashes in a little tiny urn. I loved that cat but I wasn't spending £150.

My dad once knew an undertaker and they told me that the ashes in any urn contain many other people as trying to clean up a cremation oven for each body takes too long and would cost more. Kind of made me think the whole idea of a respectful cremation or burial is all bollocks to me. Doesn't help that my mum thinks that once a person's dead there is nothing left and the body is just a shell therefore funerals are just a waste of time. For a woman who I've grown up to know as a kind person, it's one of those things that surprised me.
>> No. 381523 Anonymous
25th August 2014
Monday 11:11 pm
381523 spacer
>>381511
What an adorable little fellow.
>> No. 381524 Anonymous
26th August 2014
Tuesday 12:27 am
381524 spacer
>>381513
Why is that unkind of her? Seems quite pragmatic to me. Diogenes would approve.
>> No. 381526 Anonymous
26th August 2014
Tuesday 2:39 am
381526 spacer
>>381524
I don't think he was implying that she was unkind, more that her kindness is centred in the present.
>> No. 381527 Anonymous
26th August 2014
Tuesday 3:50 am
381527 spacer
>>381524>>381526
It's just that it was very unusual for her to essentially say "fuck funerals, waste of bloody time just throw them in the big oven and be done with it. No I don't want the ashes, are you mental? I do enough dusting as it is." when she tends to think of others and goes through all sorts of shit to keep others happy.

I mean christ I've never heard the woman swear in my life except for once while watching a horror movie.
>> No. 381528 Anonymous
26th August 2014
Tuesday 6:26 am
381528 spacer
>>381527

To me she sounds more like some totally enlightened zen master rather than unkind.
>> No. 381529 Anonymous
26th August 2014
Tuesday 7:45 am
381529 spacer
>>381527

Why the fuck do you even care? You're going to be dead either way. She could have you stuffed and posed as the centrepiece of the lounge, and you would have no idea because you'll be dead.
>> No. 381530 Anonymous
26th August 2014
Tuesday 8:33 am
381530 spacer
I'm seriously considering donating my body to medical science to bypass that silly funeral nonsense.
>> No. 381531 Anonymous
26th August 2014
Tuesday 1:34 pm
381531 spacer
>>381530

It's other people's funerals you want to worry about. I dread the day my parents die just because then I'll have to put up with the rest of my revolting extended family.
>> No. 381537 Anonymous
26th August 2014
Tuesday 6:38 pm
381537 spacer
>>381530

Think of those that spent nights alone with ARE JIM'LL.
>> No. 381544 Anonymous
26th August 2014
Tuesday 7:04 pm
381544 spacer
>>381529
It's more of this I worry about >>381531 than myself. I don't give much of a shit what happens to my body after I die. The only worry is if I die before my parents and they find my porn collection. Nothing illegal or anything but I don't think they'll understand my massive collection of JAVs which feature some sort of bizarre situation in each of them which can vary from watersports, to hermaphrodites (due to the censoring it's like it's a fake cock or I masturbated to gay porn) to gameshows which involve whipped cream and broken marriages.

Not to mention I've got a porno of conjoined twins from the early 90s kicking about on my external hard drive somewhere.

Oh and the 500GBs of hentai games and VNs but that's less of a priority as I doubt my parents wouldn't know how to turn a PC onto Japanese locale, mount a virtual CD/DVD and then install it entirely in Japanese.

I'm totally not worried about dying before my parents.
>> No. 381663 Anonymous
30th August 2014
Saturday 4:35 am
381663 spacer
>>381544

I want to see the conjoined twin porn. Nay- have to see it.
>> No. 381664 Anonymous
30th August 2014
Saturday 5:15 am
381664 spacer
>>381663
I'm glad someone asked. My id said yes, but the rest of me said no.
>> No. 381666 Anonymous
30th August 2014
Saturday 6:01 am
381666 spacer
>>381544
Sounds like you need a porn buddy, like Jeff and Steve.
>> No. 382322 Anonymous
7th September 2014
Sunday 8:42 pm
382322 spacer
Poor Rolph!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2745921/Paedophile-entertainer-Rolf-Harris-loses-stone-bars-t-stand-prison-food.html
>> No. 382326 Anonymous
7th September 2014
Sunday 9:22 pm
382326 spacer

g.jpg
382326382326382326
>>381663
Oh anicent imageboard folder.
>> No. 382330 Anonymous
7th September 2014
Sunday 9:29 pm
382330 spacer
>>382326
http://www.youtube.com/v/KXE3i1rsmwQ
>> No. 382337 Anonymous
7th September 2014
Sunday 9:45 pm
382337 spacer
>>382330
This finally answers the one question I had about them, thanks. They have one minge between them.
>> No. 382342 Anonymous
7th September 2014
Sunday 10:19 pm
382342 spacer
>>382337

But does only one of them get to feel the minge effect when it's being worked?
>> No. 382357 Anonymous
7th September 2014
Sunday 11:39 pm
382357 spacer
>>382330>>382342
What if one isn't in the mood and the other wants the cock?
>> No. 382361 Anonymous
7th September 2014
Sunday 11:47 pm
382361 spacer
>>382357

The other one can read a book or something.
>> No. 382362 Anonymous
7th September 2014
Sunday 11:58 pm
382362 spacer
>>382342

Maybe one feels it up the fanny and the other up the arse. Double trouble.
>> No. 382369 Anonymous
8th September 2014
Monday 12:37 am
382369 spacer
>>382362

Let's hope they don't share each others' dildos.
>> No. 383309 Anonymous
16th September 2014
Tuesday 6:47 pm
383309 spacer
What is it with all these gay degenerate pedos?

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 383639 Anonymous
19th September 2014
Friday 7:42 pm
383639 spacer

ball_43ca4d_1330731.jpg
383639383639383639
OP: so this guy is noncing right now then. Better pour petrol through his letterbox just in case.
>> No. 383825 Anonymous
22nd September 2014
Monday 7:39 am
383825 spacer

rolf.jpg
383825383825383825
>>346596
>> No. 383928 Anonymous
24th September 2014
Wednesday 4:21 pm
383928 spacer
So it looks like the Hairy Cornflake might have to do some porridge.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-29331740
>> No. 383931 Anonymous
24th September 2014
Wednesday 4:46 pm
383931 spacer
>>383928

Is that gay slang?
>> No. 383932 Anonymous
24th September 2014
Wednesday 4:47 pm
383932 spacer
>>383931

I think it's nonce slang ladmate.
>> No. 383933 Anonymous
24th September 2014
Wednesday 5:10 pm
383933 spacer

porridge.jpg
383933383933383933
>>383931
>>383932
Really, lads?
>> No. 383935 Anonymous
24th September 2014
Wednesday 5:34 pm
383935 spacer
>>383933

I hope after he gets put in the barbox he is properly rummaged in his frosted molasses.
>> No. 383958 Anonymous
25th September 2014
Thursday 7:31 am
383958 spacer
>>383933
Yoof today, eh?
>> No. 384164 Anonymous
30th September 2014
Tuesday 6:45 pm
384164 spacer
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-29431833

>DJ Neil Fox - known as "Dr Fox" - has been arrested by police investigating claims of historical sex offences.

You're scraping the barrel now, lads.
>> No. 384165 Anonymous
30th September 2014
Tuesday 6:46 pm
384165 spacer
>>384164

>Do I look like a fucking crab to you!
>> No. 384166 Anonymous
30th September 2014
Tuesday 7:21 pm
384166 spacer
http://www.youtube.com/v/wEolSjlcqng
>> No. 384167 Anonymous
30th September 2014
Tuesday 8:04 pm
384167 spacer
>>384164

I bet you 30 quid that Pete Waterman will be next.
>> No. 384168 Anonymous
30th September 2014
Tuesday 9:09 pm
384168 spacer
>>384167

Bloody hell Torylad, I don't have that kind of scratch.
>> No. 384169 Anonymous
30th September 2014
Tuesday 9:10 pm
384169 spacer
I just watched Jonathan King's Vile Pervert - The Musical. It's remarkable.

http://www.youtube.com/v/jbdg7m8vCdc

There's also the uncensored version at www.vilepervert.com if you particularly want to see his dick at 0:53
>> No. 384170 Anonymous
30th September 2014
Tuesday 10:52 pm
384170 spacer
>>384168

Alright lad, don't get out of your pram. I admit that £30 was a bit pushy, how about a fiver?
>> No. 384228 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 8:28 pm
384228 spacer
Are Fry is next. He's on the verge of admitting it.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/stephen-fry-girls-who-had-sex-with-rock-stars-at-14-wouldnt-call-themselves-victims--they-were-proud-of-it-9769205.html

And he's a gay pedo. The worst kind of pedo.
>> No. 384229 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 8:32 pm
384229 spacer
>>384228
I always knew he was a self-obsessed cunt. Fuck him.
>> No. 384230 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 8:59 pm
384230 spacer
>>384228
Anyone who has read his novel called (I think) The Hippopotamus already knew this.

The plot involves a young boy who people think can cure terminal illness through buggery.
>> No. 384231 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 9:10 pm
384231 spacer
>>384228
To think he is seen a progressive figure. That's a terrible trivialising thing to say.
>> No. 384232 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 9:15 pm
384232 spacer
>>384231
It's the same shit as with Savile and Harris.

>Oh isn't he a funny card! What a character!
>> No. 384233 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 9:53 pm
384233 spacer
>>384228

I found this comment underneath the article quite brave, given it's completely at odds with the current dogma:

>He's right about the girls going after rock stars in the 60s and 70s (and 80s) and not thinking of themselves victims. Many of them have written books about their experiences. They certainly don't seem to see it as abuse (either at the time or in retrospect.) Anyone who has read (for example) 'I'm With the Band' by Pamela Des Barres or 'Hammer of the Gods' (the Led Zeppelin biography) will know that the most famous of all the groupies were all totally underage, some as young as 12. Some were even interviewed by and written about in the rock magazines of the time. It's acknowledged in the film 'Almost Famous' too ("How old are you?" "Eighteen." "Me too! How old are you really?" "Seventeen." "Me too!" "I'm actually sixteen.." "Me too. Isn't it funny? The truth just sounds different." "I'm fifteen.") It was (and is) common knowledge. Iggy Pop wrote a song (decades later) called 'Look Away' the first line of which is "I slept with Sable when she was 13" (referring to early 70s super-groupoo Sable Starr, who would later (at 15) run away to New York with Johnny Thunders.) Jimmy Page's groupoo girlfriend, Lori Maddox, was 14 when they were a couple (Lori's previous claim to fame being that she had lost her virginity at 13 to David Bowie.) There are loads of examples. You'd pretty much have to arrest everyone who was in a band in the 60s, 70s or 80s if you want to catch all the guys who slept with underage girls...
>> No. 384234 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 9:59 pm
384234 spacer
>>384233
They're all a bunch of disgusting scumbags. They've never contributed anything to anyone. Jail the lot of them, I say. Put them on a polar island with the bankers and let them fight it out among themselves.
>> No. 384235 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 10:04 pm
384235 spacer
>>384234

>They're all a bunch of disgusting scumbags.

http://www.rsdnation.com/node/275710
>> No. 384236 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 10:37 pm
384236 spacer
>>384235
I don't think I've ever heard so much pseudo-scientific bollocks in a single post. Obviously you're not going to be able to find a perfect method for picking up women until chaos theory stops being a thing.
>> No. 384239 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 10:57 pm
384239 spacer
>>384236
Oraganic elements behave in non-linear patterns. Oraganic elements behave in non-linear patterns.
>> No. 384240 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 11:00 pm
384240 spacer
>>384239

Only the worst kind of organics. Everything else is easy.

http://www.youtube.com/v/_5bGPa-QXV4
>> No. 384241 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 11:48 pm
384241 spacer

042514_image_child_sex_case_2_Christopher_Steele.jpg
384241384241384241
>>346596

I know he's not a proper celebrity but gay porn star Mike Dozer was convicted of noncing a 14-year-old today.

http://str8upgayporn.com/guilty-federal-jury-convicts-mike-dozer/
>> No. 384245 Anonymous
4th October 2014
Saturday 12:14 am
384245 spacer
>>384240
Those OD's I can only dream of ....
>> No. 384573 Anonymous
11th October 2014
Saturday 10:07 pm
384573 spacer
3/43 odds that this will be longest post of the year

Do Ladbrokes do bitcoins
>> No. 384574 Anonymous
11th October 2014
Saturday 10:47 pm
384574 spacer
Theory

Age of consent in Spain is 13.
>> No. 384575 Anonymous
11th October 2014
Saturday 10:49 pm
384575 spacer
>>384573
Surely it started last year, therefore is not a competitor?
>> No. 384578 Anonymous
11th October 2014
Saturday 11:05 pm
384578 spacer
>>384575

You're right. Well spotted. You've won a pair o Dick Quax running shoes via Yodel.
>> No. 384753 Anonymous
14th October 2014
Tuesday 5:11 pm
384753 spacer
There has been a lovely accidental noncing storyline on Doctors of late. The culprit is the eskimo one, I kid you not.
>> No. 384755 Anonymous
14th October 2014
Tuesday 5:15 pm
384755 spacer
>>384753

>I kid you not.

That's not what the prosecution says! Wahey!

Also, how do you "accidentally" nonce someone?
>> No. 384756 Anonymous
14th October 2014
Tuesday 5:52 pm
384756 spacer
>>384755

>how do you "accidentally" nonce someone?

Statutory rape, innit. "I swer I thot she wos 16, m'lud. Her tits were huge!"
>> No. 384758 Anonymous
14th October 2014
Tuesday 6:50 pm
384758 spacer
>>384755

She slipped and he fell.
>> No. 384762 Anonymous
14th October 2014
Tuesday 7:26 pm
384762 spacer
>>384753

Doctors regularly features storylines that have taken from recent news headlines. (usually with an annoying political message to them)
>> No. 384778 Anonymous
15th October 2014
Wednesday 10:09 am
384778 spacer
>>384756

She did have a lovely pair. Pretended to be 20 when she was only days off being 16. Oh the comedy!

>>384762

Despite the moralising, it's still the best thing on telly.
>> No. 384844 Anonymous
17th October 2014
Friday 4:52 pm
384844 spacer
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2795269/paedophile-24-raped-12-year-old-girl-handed-job-chef-jamie-oliver-s-fifteen-restaurant-ahead-thousands-disadvantaged-applicants.html

First he took our Turkey Twizzlers, and now he employs Kiddy Fiddlers!
>> No. 384882 Anonymous
19th October 2014
Sunday 7:33 am
384882 spacer
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/11167945/Authors-concerns-after-court-rules-writer-cant-publish-sex-abuse-memoir.html

I'm not the smartest man, but isn't this like banning GODWIN Anne Frank's diary because children shouldn't have to read about the horrible things that went on?
>> No. 384886 Anonymous
19th October 2014
Sunday 10:23 am
384886 spacer
>>384882

Yes, it's absurd to put the wellbeing of a single kid ahead of the freedom of expression and public interest of the entire nation.

But, fuck me, they did it anyway.


Also, explain "GODWIN", if you would?
>> No. 384887 Anonymous
19th October 2014
Sunday 10:24 am
384887 spacer
>>384886

Oh, wait, I just realised you meant Godwin's Law. 'kay, my bad.
>> No. 384888 Anonymous
19th October 2014
Sunday 11:25 am
384888 spacer
>>384887

>'kay, my bad.

...
>> No. 384893 Anonymous
19th October 2014
Sunday 1:46 pm
384893 spacer
>>384888

I'm perfectly entitled to write like a total boner, all so long as my grammar remains true. Know the law.

And with such a gross misuse of an ellipsis as that, perhaps you ought not to cast your sinner's stones so far from home?
>> No. 384904 Anonymous
19th October 2014
Sunday 2:54 pm
384904 spacer
>>384882

Good grief, sounds like another depressing indictment of the state of freedom in our country that we should all get up in arms abou-

>The author’s ex-wife

Oh wait, no it isn't. It's just another bitter divorcee trying to piss through their ex-partner's letterbox. Nothing to see here lads.
>> No. 384905 Anonymous
19th October 2014
Sunday 3:14 pm
384905 spacer
>>384904
If I were a child I'm not sure I'd be keen on my dad publishing (for-profit) accounts of being molested and abused.
>> No. 384907 Anonymous
19th October 2014
Sunday 4:27 pm
384907 spacer
>>384905

I'm sure he'd manage. Might even be beneficial, a rare chance for some character building in a little rich brat.
>> No. 384908 Anonymous
19th October 2014
Sunday 4:36 pm
384908 spacer
>>384907
er, ok lad.
>> No. 384909 Anonymous
20th October 2014
Monday 12:40 am
384909 spacer
>>384904
I don't know, hearing my drunken father talk about the time the choir master nearly burst one of his testicles as a child made me feel distinctly uncomfortable as a 14 year old. Might be best to wait until your son is a bit older before you expose them to some of the severe emotional trauma you experienced as a child. It's not nice seeing your parents in pain.
>> No. 384919 Anonymous
20th October 2014
Monday 1:09 pm
384919 spacer
No better thread to put it in:

Who the fuck is Lynda Bellingham and why is her death headline news?
>> No. 384920 Anonymous
20th October 2014
Monday 2:03 pm
384920 spacer
>>384919

She was a supernonce.
>> No. 384921 Anonymous
20th October 2014
Monday 2:06 pm
384921 spacer
>>384920
Can we please make use of the standard SI prefixes? Thanks.
>> No. 384922 Anonymous
20th October 2014
Monday 2:35 pm
384922 spacer
>>384921

Not when Drunken Racists win 600 seats in the election.
>> No. 384924 Anonymous
20th October 2014
Monday 2:58 pm
384924 spacer
>>384919

>In 2010, Bellingham was the voice-over for British rap band N-Dubz's six-part reality show on Channel 4.
>> No. 384927 Anonymous
20th October 2014
Monday 7:39 pm
384927 spacer

2724914.jpg
384927384927384927
>>384919

Here "she" is on the right, in the bad photoshop.
>> No. 384932 Anonymous
20th October 2014
Monday 11:33 pm
384932 spacer

bellingham.jpg
384932384932384932
>>384927

She could stir my meaty granules - IYKWIM.
>> No. 384941 Anonymous
21st October 2014
Tuesday 1:43 pm
384941 spacer
>>384932
I'd give her a beefy stock load.
>> No. 384952 Anonymous
21st October 2014
Tuesday 6:06 pm
384952 spacer
>>384932
I'd place my meat in her oven IYKWIM
>> No. 384953 Anonymous
21st October 2014
Tuesday 7:08 pm
384953 spacer
>>384952

I'd whip her batter until it thickens IYKWIM.
>> No. 384956 Anonymous
21st October 2014
Tuesday 8:22 pm
384956 spacer
>>384953
I'd serve a delicious creamy sauce over her succulent meat IYKWIM.
>> No. 384957 Anonymous
21st October 2014
Tuesday 9:47 pm
384957 spacer
Outrage at outbreak of common sense at NCA:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-2800208/Fury-as-immigrant-paedophiles-get-chid-porn-on-NHS.html

Since they aren't allowing comments, I have to have my fun somehow.
>> No. 384958 Anonymous
21st October 2014
Tuesday 9:51 pm
384958 spacer
>>384932
>>384941
>>384952
>>384953
>>384956

You chaps can do what you want, but I would've shagged her.

I'll get my coat.
>> No. 384959 Anonymous
22nd October 2014
Wednesday 12:06 am
384959 spacer
>>384958
I'm not sure what you mean.
>> No. 384960 Anonymous
22nd October 2014
Wednesday 12:20 am
384960 spacer
>>384958
Is that a euphemism for something?
>> No. 385512 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 12:49 am
385512 spacer

HarveyProctor.jpg
385512385512385512
Oh Harvey. I've a funny feeling we're going to be learning a lot about you soon.
>> No. 385513 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 12:57 am
385513 spacer
>>385512
Will the first thing be who he is?
>> No. 385514 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 1:04 am
385514 spacer
Apparently now the establishment is going to start running sympathy pieces about pedos.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/10948796/Paedophilia-is-natural-and-normal-for-males.html
Also some American websites as well.
http://gawker.com/5941037/born-this-way-sympathy-and-science-for-those-who--want-to-have-sex-with-children

Oh, also Germany is legalising incest. Which I'm sure won't contribute to child abuse at all. Definitely not.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/11119062/Incest-a-fundamental-right-German-committee-says.html
>> No. 385516 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 1:17 am
385516 spacer
>>385514
>Also some American websites as well.
>9/07/12
Er, okay.

>Oh, also Germany is legalising incest.
You didn't read that article.

>But a spokeswoman for Angela Merkel’s ruling Christian Democrats indicated the government was unlikely to adopt the Ethics Council’s recommendations.
>> No. 385517 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 1:30 am
385517 spacer
>>385516
The first article is certainly worrying though. It treads a little too centre of the line for me.

The tones of all those articles do.
>> No. 385519 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 1:44 am
385519 spacer
>>385517
Remember that the Torygraph is a quality noncepaper.
>> No. 385524 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 1:01 pm
385524 spacer
>>385516
You don't often see a classically handsome paedo, do you?
>> No. 385526 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 3:10 pm
385526 spacer
Came across these ruminations from about Stephen Fry.
http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/05/01/is-there-more-to-stephen-fry-than-meets-the-eye/

Some interesting unfounded allegations in the comments section after, if you like that sort of thing.
>> No. 385527 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 3:15 pm
385527 spacer
>>385526

>At first glance he appears to be no more than a pompous, arrogant, smug, prat, who loves to lecture all and sundry about grammar and gayness.

Yeah, well, no biases or mentalism on that page then.
>> No. 385531 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 3:57 pm
385531 spacer
>>385527
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin!_or_Tobacco_and_Boys

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hippopotamus

His work speaks for itself.
>> No. 385532 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 5:18 pm
385532 spacer
>>385531
Not if you understand what the word 'fiction' means, you silly sod.
>> No. 385533 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 5:23 pm
385533 spacer
>>385531

Well, not really. Writing fiction does not make one culpable of those fictions. Or ought we arrest anyone who writes tales of illegality? Tarrantino must have a bloody cellar full of bodies if so.*

*That's not a good example because he actually does.

Also that Coleman guy is obviously fucking mental, not to speak of his deranged comments section.

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/10/24/filthy-britain-and-the-wrath-of-god/

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/09/08/breaking-news-kate-and-william-expecting-baby-no-2-how-very-convenient/

The first link is just a stream of mental screen shouting. And the second is, in hindsight, clearly bollocks, as none of his 6 predictions came to be. Which actually makes him less effective than a prediction placebo; astonishing, as I just made that up.
>> No. 385535 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 6:07 pm
385535 spacer
>>385533
>Writing fiction does not make one culpable of those fictions.
Though apparently possessing it does.
>> No. 385536 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 7:03 pm
385536 spacer
>>385532
>>385533
Well, you've convinced me then. Just because he writes numerous works of fiction about buggering young boys, doesn't mean he likes buggering young boys. In the same way that Irvine Welsh has most likely never touched heroin.

One of you will probably be more versed on this, but are there are any famous writers who write about buggering boys? Did it ever turn out that they did? Tarantino sets his films in settings far removed from his own life, he tends to rip off old Japanese cinema or something. Stephen Fry writes about trysts between public schoolboys of a homosexual nature, featuring an upper class set of characters. Probably nothing to it dear boy.

Oh, he does sometimes get pissed up then tell stories about other people buggering boys.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2618339/EPHRAIM-HARDCASTLE-Stephen-Frys-lurid-speech-liberal-minded-guests-dinner-event.html

>The comic treated guests to a graphic story about Gore Vidal’s stay at a top London hotel where he rang a gay escort agency to arrange a boy for an energetic afternoon session.

>Despite being attended by usually liberal-minded literary types, Fry’s lurid details of the sex act with the young man and what he would or would not perform was too much for some guests

And although on its own it is in no way an indicator, taken in conjunction with all of this other stuff the fact that he was abused as a young boy and many abusers were abused themselves, I think some scrutiny of him could be prudent.
More worrying is his dismissal of the abuse as "just some bloke who was taking liberties."
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2007/03/28/stephen-fry-opens-up-about-school-sexual-assault/

Is he in a position to have abused anyone? Well, as someone who has worked at the BBC for decades, who knows. I'm sure nothing untoward is going on there.

Besides, it's not as if he ever does anything indiscreet. Like appear to be covered in snort and leave a club with a younger looking chap. They don't name who he is in this article, I wonder if he's even old enough to drink.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2359329/Stephen-Fry-needs-dusting-leaves-club-head-covered-mysterious-white-powder.html

All I'm saying is, if Ladbrokes were offering odds on him having skeletons in his closet, I'd be putting money down.

I think he's too popular to be thrown to the lions though.
>> No. 385537 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 7:33 pm
385537 spacer
>>385536
> numerous works of fiction about buggering young boys
You've mentioned two. 'Latin...' I've not read, but he wrote it whilst at University, not long removed from public school buggery, so it's hardly surprising he'd draw on it as a theme, and 'The Liar' is semi-autobiographical (based around his time at Public School and as a teenage tearaway living on credit card fraud - again, it's not a big leap for someone of his background to imagine that a teenager on the streets might end up selling his arse to get by, and the idea is a) not presented as a Good Thing, and b) almost certainly made up by the titular Liar, rather than actually happening). Someone earlier on mentioned 'The Hippopotamus' which does not in fact feature magic buggery - it features magic sperm, bestiality, incest, and attempted rape, but no buggery that I can remember.

>More worrying is his dismissal of the abuse as "just some bloke who was taking liberties."
Many victims of sexual abuse minimise or downplay the significance of it, either as a defense mechanism, an attempt to not be defined by victimhood, or whatever else. Comments from the Mail about what's lurid are too laughable to be worth taking seriously.

Fry can be an arse, and many of his pronouncements on sex are laughable (but then again as someone with bipolar his views on sex are bound to be... unusual... when he's on the manic end of the spectrum) but I've seen nothing to suggest he practices or endorses paedophilia.
>> No. 385538 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 7:38 pm
385538 spacer
>>385536

Other than bigotry, conjecture and hearsay, you have literally fuck all to be working on. Come to think of it, you don't even have hearsay. Seeing as he's been borderline autismally awkward practically his entire life, none of this shit surprises me. And he does have skeletons in his closet, they can be regularly seen falling all over the fucking shop.

Btw, fucking Coleman, you just reposted your shit from the website. I don't know why, it wasn't the font stopping it from making sense.

And the day I take my arts criticism from a Tory MP is the day I volunteer for the Space Corps, and fly away to battle the Fighting Fairies of Faraday Centuria 4.
>> No. 385539 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 7:39 pm
385539 spacer
>>385526>>385533
This Coleman site is utterly deranged, BTL comments even more so. Makes OUR EMILY look normal. I'd like all the paedos rounded up and burned, but its completely wrong to conflate any old bumder with them. Having sex with other young men when he was a young man doesn't change any of that.

I'm sure that Mr Fry has done some things he isn't proud of and would prefer not to be in the papers; he's actually very open about some of those. He isn't a paedophile.
>> No. 385540 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 8:27 pm
385540 spacer
>>385536

>arrange a boy

How many escort services do you you know that cater in young boys? He would have been 18, but a boy in comparison to Gore Vidal.
>> No. 385543 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 9:19 pm
385543 spacer
>>385540
He could have been 38 and still a boy in comparison to Gore Vidal.
>> No. 385544 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 9:28 pm
385544 spacer
>>385540

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10441697/Gore-Vidal-terrified-paedophilia-claims-would-be-make-public-family-says.html
>> No. 385545 Anonymous
17th November 2014
Monday 9:32 pm
385545 spacer
>>385536

Jonathan King wrote a song which goes "There's Nothing Wrong With Buggering Boys".

(Let me see if I've got this youtube link right.)

http://www.youtube.com/v/jbdg7m8vCdc?start=3907
>> No. 385553 Anonymous
18th November 2014
Tuesday 2:11 am
385553 spacer
I knew pointing out all these things about Fry would get some sympathetic replies.

That nice man from Blackadder couldn't possibly be doing anything like this could he? Plus he's so good on QI!

I'll be here to gloat in ten years when Fry dies off and it all comes out.
>> No. 385554 Anonymous
18th November 2014
Tuesday 6:31 am
385554 spacer
>>385553

My first thought was I really wouldn't be surprised. I don't know why. Maybe because he played Oscar Wilde so I have that association in my mind, although I don't expect people who played criminals to be violent.
>> No. 385556 Anonymous
18th November 2014
Tuesday 7:09 am
385556 spacer
>>385553

Well it's good to see you have goals in life.

And yes, making up things about people who you just happen not to like does tend to incite a negative reaction.
>> No. 385557 Anonymous
18th November 2014
Tuesday 8:23 am
385557 spacer
>>385556
I haven't made anything up. I've posted links to back up everything I've said. Have you even read any of his books?

Also you'll notice I haven't made an outright claim. Just saying I wouldn't be at all surprised.
>> No. 385558 Anonymous
18th November 2014
Tuesday 9:34 am
385558 spacer
>>385536
>the fact that he was abused as a young boy and many abusers were abused themselves
I'm pretty sure the causal link between being absued and being an abuser has been repeatedly shown to be utter bollocks. If you really want to stand by it then perhaps we should start locking up victims of abuse pre-emptively.

>Stephen fry is a Jew and a homosexual giving him top prority with Mossad who now run MI5,(who run the BBC)
This is how you sound.
>> No. 385559 Anonymous
18th November 2014
Tuesday 11:05 am
385559 spacer
>>385558
>This is how you sound.
Strange, I did a control+f for the line you "quoted" and didn't find myself saying it, or anything like it. I think you're imagining nazis monsters under the bed.
>> No. 385560 Anonymous
18th November 2014
Tuesday 12:08 pm
385560 spacer
>>385559

No, we're seeing mad crayfishs on the webpage you got all this hysterical rumour from. We aren't imagining anything. Well, other than you being a potentially rational person that is.
>> No. 385561 Anonymous
18th November 2014
Tuesday 12:27 pm
385561 spacer
>>385553
>>385557

You silly and patronising sod, you really haven't pointed anything out at all - you've made some points which were either factually wrong or a ludicrously over-simplistic misreading of events, and linked back to a frothing cauldron of lunacy that makes ARE EMILY seem like a reliable source. I've no idea if >>385556 has read any of Fry's books, but I have, and they simply aren't what you're claiming they are.
>>385558 is right about how you sound, and he wasn't quoting you (again, you're not the sharpest knife in the cutlery drawer), he was giving an example of something equally ridiculous as the things you've been saying.
>> No. 385562 Anonymous
18th November 2014
Tuesday 1:38 pm
385562 spacer
>>385554
My first thought was "If anyone could be a confirmed bumdernonce and get away with it just by being likeable..."
>> No. 385563 Anonymous
18th November 2014
Tuesday 1:40 pm
385563 spacer
>>385558

>Stephen fry is a Jew and a homosexual giving him top prority with Mossad who now run MI5,(who run the BBC)

Blimey. It all makes sense now.
>> No. 385564 Anonymous
18th November 2014
Tuesday 2:31 pm
385564 spacer
>>385559
I said this is how you sound, not "this is what you said". The quote was taken from the comments on one of the articles about Fry that were linked to.
>> No. 385880 Anonymous
5th December 2014
Friday 1:37 pm
385880 spacer
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/royal-family-granted-new-right-of-secrecy-2179148.html

Welp... Big Chick must have killed a kid or something for this level of cover up to be taking place.

Big Liz Knew. FGAU (For Gordonstoun and Umbongo)
>> No. 385890 Anonymous
5th December 2014
Friday 3:28 pm
385890 spacer
>>385880

>Saturday 08 January 2011

Umm, 'kay? And not to speak for Otherlad, but don't most already know the Royals are exempt from the Freedom of Information Act?
>> No. 385893 Anonymous
5th December 2014
Friday 3:52 pm
385893 spacer
>>385890

I was being alarmist and facetious, YMCAlad. You can call off the heavies.
>> No. 385894 Anonymous
5th December 2014
Friday 3:57 pm
385894 spacer
Well I figured, but none of that seems like it's worthy bumping a 3 weeks-post-free thread for.

>>385893

>YMCAlad

Huh?

>You can call off the heavies.

Double huh?
>> No. 385895 Anonymous
5th December 2014
Friday 4:05 pm
385895 spacer
I'll remember not to bother next time I want to bump the ginger thread on /x/ if it has been more than a couple of weeks, thanks for showing me the obvious error in my actions.
>> No. 385896 Anonymous
5th December 2014
Friday 4:08 pm
385896 spacer
>>385894

Didn't you know? The YMCA are listening to your conversations and monitoring your online correspondences right this minute.
>> No. 385901 Anonymous
5th December 2014
Friday 5:59 pm
385901 spacer
>>385894
>The Government Communications Headquarters (YMCA) is a British intelligence and security organisation responsible for providing signals intelligence (SIGINT) and information assurance to the British government and armed forces.
>> No. 385902 Anonymous
5th December 2014
Friday 6:11 pm
385902 spacer
>>385896

Oh, I see.

>>385895

Well that's clearly different, the entire point of that thread is to post pretty red headed women, the point of this thread isn't to post random stuff.

It's basic board etiquette, you CUNT!
>> No. 385903 Anonymous
5th December 2014
Friday 6:28 pm
385903 spacer
>>385902

The point of this thread is talk about the next celebrity wot done a noncing. The Guardian is currently in a legal battle which hinges on the legislation set out in that article being overturned, in order to publish proof that Prince Charles is a paedophile.
>> No. 385905 Anonymous
5th December 2014
Friday 9:10 pm
385905 spacer
>>385901
Fuck, they're in my ^C!
>> No. 385912 Anonymous
6th December 2014
Saturday 2:35 am
385912 spacer
>>385903
>in order to publish proof that Prince Charles is a paedophile.

Really? That's the first time I've heard that motivation mentioned - last I heard they wanted access to letters he sent to government ministers in order to prove he's been trying to influence government policy, not that he's a nonce.
>> No. 385913 Anonymous
6th December 2014
Saturday 2:58 am
385913 spacer
>>385912
Presumably one of the many policies he was seeking to have instituted was to not regard him as a nonce.
>> No. 388983 Anonymous
24th March 2015
Tuesday 11:36 am
388983 spacer

DailyMirrorTuesMarch24JPG.jpg
388983388983388983
Oops.
>> No. 388984 Anonymous
24th March 2015
Tuesday 11:53 am
388984 spacer
>>388983

Genetically, he has more in common with crabs than you or me.
>> No. 388985 Anonymous
24th March 2015
Tuesday 12:02 pm
388985 spacer
>>388983
Apparently the BBC have stripped him of his doctorate, referring to him simply as "the DJ Neil Fox" in their story.
>> No. 389122 Anonymous
30th March 2015
Monday 2:11 pm
389122 noko
>>388983

sweet christ, the guy from the paedogeddon episode has been accused of actual paedophilia. That is some shit
>> No. 389124 Anonymous
30th March 2015
Monday 4:00 pm
389124 spacer
>>389122

>noko

Hmm. Does that even work on .gs? It's like a red flag for immigrants. Coming over here, posting on our imageboards; It's an outrage!
>> No. 389125 Anonymous
30th March 2015
Monday 6:52 pm
389125 spacer
>>389122
Nonception.
>> No. 391479 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 7:02 am
391479 spacer

2999491B00000578-3123036-image-a-46_1434228808767.jpg
391479391479391479
Rolf is working on a comeback album.
>> No. 391480 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 7:15 am
391480 spacer
>>391479
Rolf's a cunt, but whoever took a personal letter and sold it to the papers is an even bigger one.

Those lyrics are proper shit though.
>> No. 391481 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 9:43 am
391481 spacer
>>391479
That's a pretty bitter song, but then I guess if he felt innocent he would be.
>> No. 391482 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 12:36 pm
391482 spacer
>>391481
When he gets out, imagine the facebook campaign to get it to number one.
>> No. 391483 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 3:13 pm
391483 spacer
>>391479
I don't know why he hasn't got a tune for it yet. It practically writes itself, I was singing it in my head while reading it.
>> No. 391484 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 3:22 pm
391484 spacer
>>391483

Something like this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axbzaOaG9jg
>> No. 391485 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 4:34 pm
391485 spacer
>>391479

He really needs to collaborate with Jonathan King.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbdg7m8vCdc
>> No. 391486 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 4:38 pm
391486 spacer
>>391485

The swivel-eyed, Daily-Mail-reading Drunken crayfishspers who populate his forum have already seized upon this. "Surprise".

http://www.kingofhits.co.uk/index.php?option=com_kunena&Itemid=65&func=view&catid=2&id=133284
http://www.kingofhits.co.uk/index.php?option=com_kunena&Itemid=65&func=view&catid=2&id=133283


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLh2F-2U740
>> No. 391487 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 5:22 pm
391487 spacer
>>391479
Seems like he feels innocent and wronged. Impressive.
>> No. 391492 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 6:32 pm
391492 spacer
>>391486

From top link:

>It's just a matter of time before sex abuse becomes like the gay defense in a murder case (many got away with it Oz until they changed the law)

Can I kill people because I'm gay? Can people kill me because I'm gay? Do I have to go to Australia to find out?
>> No. 391493 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 6:39 pm
391493 spacer
>>391492

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_panic_defense
>> No. 391494 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 6:53 pm
391494 spacer
>>391493

"I'm an insecure and roundly childish cunt" is a legal defense? That's disheartening.
>> No. 391495 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 6:58 pm
391495 spacer
>>391493
>Ferdinand Ambach, 32, a Hungarian tourist, was convicted of killing Ronald Brown, 69, by hitting him with a banjo and shoving the instrument's neck down Brown's throat.
What the fuck?
>> No. 391496 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 7:03 pm
391496 spacer
>>391495
That is a funny way to kill someone.
>> No. 391497 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 7:07 pm
391497 spacer
>>391496
Yeah, that level of violence really shows the innate dischord in society.
>> No. 391498 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 7:11 pm
391498 spacer
>>391497
It's the sort of murder method that's really going to resonate with people and leave a lasting impression, that's for sure.
>> No. 391499 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 7:13 pm
391499 spacer
>>391498
I find the idea hard to swallow.
>> No. 391500 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 7:21 pm
391500 spacer
>>391499
No. Just, no.
>> No. 391501 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 7:26 pm
391501 spacer
>>391494

What's childish about it? It makes people feel threatened and uncomfortable. There's no evidence about it because science has been politicised by the PC Grenade and the scientist who confirms its real will be hung out to dry.
>> No. 391502 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 8:11 pm
391502 spacer
>>391501
Interesting choice of word there, "threatened". They don't feel their lives are threatened, or that they're going to be assaulted. It's their sexuality and masculine self image that's threatened. Being made uncomfortable and to question your sexuality isn't an excuse to murder someone, even if no-one has done any research into it.
>> No. 391503 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 11:01 pm
391503 spacer
>>391501

If I were to switch one of the genders:
>In the straight panic defense, the defendant claims that they have been the object of heterosexual romantic or sexual advances. The defendant finds the advances so offensive and frightening that it brings on a psychotic state characterized by unusual violence.
would you consider that a valid defence? If not, what makes it different?
>> No. 391504 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 11:17 pm
391504 spacer
>>391494
This is Australia we're talking about, m8. They'll happily defend Tone for cheekily winking at a bint in a press conference.
>> No. 391505 Anonymous
14th June 2015
Sunday 11:20 pm
391505 spacer
>>391502
It is apparently okay to destroy careers and such though.
>> No. 391508 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 12:07 am
391508 spacer

Tunes Cherry Sugar Free Throat Lozenges Reviews.jpg
391508391508391508
>>391499
These might help.
>> No. 391509 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 12:18 am
391509 spacer
>>391502
>>391503

Maybe the gay panicker considers themself tolerant if "you don't throw it in my face" and having it thrown in their face causes a bout of homophobia which makes them see the person as subhuman and wrong so they're capable of violence towards them.

Violence caused by road rage or roid rage or sport rage seems a bit bizarre too.
>> No. 391513 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 6:52 am
391513 spacer
>>391495
Is it like symbolism? The weapon is down the throat because it's like a blowjob and choking on a dick and also it's a banjo because of cocks and snapping your banjo string.
>> No. 391518 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 4:42 pm
391518 spacer
>>391503

What makes it different is that men are not usually made afraid by advances by women and it's generally difficult for one to overpower you and rape you if you turn them down.

For a more accurate switch, tell me why you think this is so different even though the courts would accept it as an argument!

>In the male panic defense, the female defendant claims that they have been the object of male romantic or sexual advances. The defendant finds the advances so offensive and frightening that it brings on a psychotic state characterized by unusual violence.
>> No. 391520 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 4:47 pm
391520 spacer
>>391518

I think violence is perfectly reasonable to fend off an attempted rape but gay panic isn't normally about that. It's things like getting tricked by a transwoman then beating the fuck out of them upon discovering they have a dick.
>> No. 391521 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 5:26 pm
391521 spacer
>>391520
You're aware there's a school of thought that considers sex under false pretenses to be rape, right?
>> No. 391529 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 6:12 pm
391529 spacer
>>391521

It seems like legally it can be fraud and/or assault.

http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/man-%E2%80%98guilty%E2%80%99-fraud-not-telling-girlfriend-he-was-trans070313
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2110430/Gemma-Barker-jailed-Vctims-girl-dressed-boy-date-speak-anguish.html

The Gemma Barker case was crazy. She was a "master of disguise" who disguised herself as a boy to have sex with girls she was friends with already. How the heck would they not notice?

>You're aware there's a school of thought that considers sex under false pretenses to be rape, right?

That's interesting. Are underage girls who pretend they're older rapists?

I wonder how someone misrepresenting their gender differs from rape-rape in terms of possible physical and mental damage. It's not the type of rape that could leave you with fissures which need stitches. Pregnancy's out of the question if it's same-sex. MM sex is statistically more risky for STDs I think.

I guess the main psychological damage, where it was otherwise consensual, is that it might make you gayer than you thought you were.
>> No. 391530 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 6:35 pm
391530 spacer
>>391529.
>That's interesting. Are underage girls who pretend they're older rapists?
I've no doubt that at some point somewhere there must be someone who attempted to blackmail someone in this way who ended up with a conviction for it. Otherwise legally it's for the adult to know better, as that one from the football is finding out.
>> No. 391603 Anonymous
17th June 2015
Wednesday 11:44 am
391603 spacer
>>391530
I think it's a defence for the adult to reasonably believe that the child is over 16. So if the child doesn't clearly appear underage, and when asked says that they are over 16, then I'd call that reasonable belief. If they try to claim statutory rape later on, the issue of why the hell they lied about their age might come up in court.
>> No. 391605 Anonymous
17th June 2015
Wednesday 12:32 pm
391605 spacer
>>391603
I believe there are age limits at either end. I think the child has to be over 13, and the defendant needs to be under 25, and in such a case the defendant has to prove reasonable belief. Apparently merely lying about one's age doesn't create reasonable belief in and of itself, as many an offie has found to their cost. If she says she's 17 but blatantly looks younger, you're expected to know better. It doesn't help matters that if this was your defence, you wouldn't be able to put that question directly to the child, because it isn't allowed (to protect the victim).
>> No. 391606 Anonymous
17th June 2015
Wednesday 1:46 pm
391606 spacer
>>391605
>If she says she's 17 but blatantly looks younger, you're expected to know better.
That's wha5 I said, isn't iit?
>> No. 391609 Anonymous
17th June 2015
Wednesday 2:41 pm
391609 spacer
>>391606
No. The issue of why she lied about her age doesn't come up because it's off-limits. The "other person" is not on trial. You would need to prove that your belief was reasonable on its own merits, and probably have to do better than "she didn't look it" unless she really didn't look it. As in, the bus drivers keep refusing to give her halves. The older you are, the better you're supposed to be at judging this.
>> No. 391612 Anonymous
17th June 2015
Wednesday 4:21 pm
391612 spacer

challenge25mh200282.jpg
391612391612391612
>>391605

>as many an offie has found to their cost

I guess you're meant to have a "Challenge 25" policy for hooking up too.
>> No. 391617 Anonymous
17th June 2015
Wednesday 6:07 pm
391617 spacer
>>391612
Depends. If you're happy risking a lengthy prison sentence and bring dragged through muck, by all means cruise the local comp for some schoolgirl action.
>> No. 391620 Anonymous
18th June 2015
Thursday 12:14 am
391620 spacer
>>391609
>The older you are, the better you're supposed to be at judging this.
Where does it say that in law?
>> No. 391621 Anonymous
18th June 2015
Thursday 12:26 am
391621 spacer
>>391620
It doesn't, it's just obvious to people who aren't paedos.
>> No. 391878 Anonymous
23rd June 2015
Tuesday 3:34 pm
391878 spacer

FB_IMG_1435069966671.jpg
391878391878391878

>> No. 391881 Anonymous
23rd June 2015
Tuesday 5:07 pm
391881 spacer
>>391878
Coming soon to the banned publications list near you.
>> No. 398402 Anonymous
16th December 2015
Wednesday 6:17 pm
398402 spacer
Stuart Hall released from prison halfway through sentence

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-35111521
>> No. 398403 Anonymous
16th December 2015
Wednesday 6:19 pm
398403 spacer
>>398402
>halfway through sentence
No, lad. Don't start this shit again.
>> No. 398405 Anonymous
16th December 2015
Wednesday 7:38 pm
398405 spacer
>>398402
>Stuart Hall released from prison h-
Tee hee
>> No. 398406 Anonymous
16th December 2015
Wednesday 9:07 pm
398406 spacer
>>398405
shame on you. I might have laughed but that doesn't mean I'm not also disappointed in myself for it.
>> No. 404035 Anonymous
16th July 2016
Saturday 11:22 pm
404035 Justice
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lincolnshire-36796185
>Rance, of Louth, Lincolnshire, was jailed for two-and-a-half years.

This guy only got 2.5 years for causing serious injuries to 3 people through dangerous driving, where as Adam Johnson gets 6 years for fingering a girl who was less than a year away from the age of consent.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-36772586

I can't help but feel a sense of injustice.
>> No. 404038 Anonymous
16th July 2016
Saturday 11:27 pm
404038 spacer
>>404035
Write to the Attorney General complaining that the former's sentence is "unduly lenient".

https://www.gov.uk/ask-crown-court-sentence-review
>> No. 404042 Anonymous
17th July 2016
Sunday 3:34 am
404042 spacer
>>404038

That'll work lad.
>> No. 404043 Anonymous
17th July 2016
Sunday 3:55 am
404043 spacer
>>404042
Recent results on Google News certainly seem to think so.
http://www.buryfreepress.co.uk/news/crime/suffolk-man-s-prison-sentence-extended-after-successful-challenge-by-police-and-cps-1-7480002
http://www.shropshirestar.com/news/2016/03/23/telford-driver-who-killed-a-pensioner-in-crash-has-unduly-lenient-sentence-increased-by-three-years/
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/violent-prisoners-unduly-lenient-sentence-7846711
http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/crime/norwich_robber_who_was_given_unduly_lenient_sentence_has_jail_term_increased_1_4399296
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/burger-bar-boys-gun-gang-7524311

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password