>>6618

Only 7000 people in the UK did the survey. I'm guessing every single one of them had an /A/ sort of background. I'm surprised the proportions aren't higher.

I'm glad to see how popular Acid is compared to many of the other things listed there.

>>6618
Ah selection bias, we meet again!

>>6620
No DMT though?

>>6621
Even in druggie communities DMT always seemed to be more 'niche' than other, more popular hallucinogens in my experience. Possibly something to do with its expense and ROA, I'd guess.

>>6621
>No DMT though?
Was another graph added in or could you not even manage to look at all the pictures?

It's a survey of drug users, not the general population.

It's a survey of people who actively chose to respond and submit details of their background in drugs. If you don't do drugs you're obviously less likely to think it's worth giving your response.

45% of people are not taking MDMA. Surely that's obvious to anyone who thinks about it for three seconds. That would mean every single member of the adult population under 50 or so was doing it.