[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
art

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 2800)
Message
File  []
close
plank.jpg
280028002800
>> No. 2800 Anonymous
8th February 2011
Tuesday 6:09 pm
2800 spacer
Letters are just drawn shapes that we learn to use to signify events and emotions, right?

Can letters (and therefore words) be art? And I don't mean 'super god looking graffiti style' letters. I mean handwriting.
Expand all images.
>> No. 2801 Anonymous
8th February 2011
Tuesday 10:29 pm
2801 spacer

gothic_calligraphy2.jpg
280128012801
Yes.
>> No. 2802 Anonymous
8th February 2011
Tuesday 10:58 pm
2802 spacer
>>2800

This is an established art form. You're showing yourself up. Tsk.

>>2801

Someone with a touch of class, I see.
>> No. 2803 Anonymous
9th February 2011
Wednesday 5:26 am
2803 spacer
All three of us in one thread, amazing
Sage for no contribution.
>> No. 2804 Anonymous
9th February 2011
Wednesday 2:52 pm
2804 spacer
>>2801

Yes but that isn't handwriting. I mean any letter that gets wombed through your letterhole.
>> No. 2806 Anonymous
10th February 2011
Thursday 6:03 pm
2806 spacer

corienscopperplateexample0fk.jpg
280628062806
>>2804
Well this is the handwriting of someone who puts in effort. I'd call it art.
>> No. 2811 Anonymous
15th February 2011
Tuesday 10:25 am
2811 spacer
>>2800

Do you mean 'could writing be classified as art' or 'could the physical image of writing be classified as art'?
>> No. 2820 Anonymous
21st February 2011
Monday 12:04 am
2820 spacer
Words are used in art all the time, even historically. Quite a few artists have made pieces consisting solely of words.
learntooart
>> No. 2824 Anonymous
4th March 2011
Friday 4:48 pm
2824 spacer
Letters can definitely be considered art - however we usually don't think it of the ones we're most familiar with. In Western societies, people find characters from Oriental scripts pleasing, and turn them into tattoos and such. In China, the reverse is true - they make merchandise (graphic t-shirts, for example) with text in the Latin alphabet, often without any idea what it means, so you end up with children's clothes shops stocking shirts with "fuck" and "i love racism" on them.
>> No. 2828 Anonymous
12th March 2011
Saturday 1:58 pm
2828 spacer
>>2800

From a Fine art perspective (hurf student):

Letters, words, phrases ect. are all symbols/placeholders used by societies for emotional and intellectual response, and are thus an extremely valid vehicle to utilise, particularly in contemporary art which places dissemination of concept at a much higher level to aesthetic form (words and phrases are great for their malleablity). Not to say that the presentation of the words doesn't have a profound effect on how the message is conveyed (because it does, and has huge potential to change the whole peice).

In the end, the general response to "is x and x art?" is that anything can be art as long as it is scrutinised, deconstructed and conpared as art. The movement towards conceptualisation and installation has only reinforced this idea and semiotics has become a staple of the intellectual process of desconstruction.

In terms of whether typography can be classed as "good art" though is wholly dependant on how you decide to tackle the concept. calligraphy - adding curly loops onto things itself is fairly shallow, as is fonts ect. it's an artform, but it isn't necessarily art. To forgo the message implied in the actual text to alone look at the aesthetic in which it is presented is ridiculous; you need to scrutinise the entire peice and the aesthetic presentation needs to have a meaningful relationship with the diction of the text involved otherwise it's simply needless pretention of the INT THAT GUD espousers.

If you want to explore the possibilities of using text in art, remember to look at the big picture. Marrying the concepts together (aesthetic, diction and implication) has the potential to make incredibly powerful statements very elegantly.
>> No. 2921 Anonymous
30th July 2011
Saturday 4:59 pm
2921 spacer
>implying art is not on every key he pressed to make the post.

fucking idiot.
>> No. 2922 Anonymous
30th July 2011
Saturday 5:01 pm
2922 spacer
>>2921

>implying

Fucking stop this you little cunt.
>> No. 2923 Anonymous
31st July 2011
Sunday 10:54 pm
2923 spacer
Gentlemen, please. Not this sort of thing on /art/. It's a nice quiet little neighbourhood.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password