[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / boo / beat / com / fat / job / lit / mph / map / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
BOO!

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 1700)
Message
File  []
close
Mix.jpg
170017001700
>> No. 1700 Anonymous
2nd August 2011
Tuesday 1:14 am
1700 Thermate experiments
https://www.youtube.com/v/5d5iIoCiI8g

Some interesting experiments (especially in the second half of the video) with thermite/thermate compounds. Certainly food for thought as he made some progress and opened up some possibilities even in the short time he was working with it. Some other experiment videos in his channel too.

Might even give you some ideas for fun if you are bored and want to do some experimenting of your own or just like dramatic sparks and flares. Do be safe, etc.
Marked for deletion.
Expand all images.
>> No. 1738 Anonymous
17th August 2011
Wednesday 9:33 pm
1738 spacer
>>1700
If nothing else he's proved national geographic wrong. He should write them a letter to them.
>> No. 1739 Anonymous
19th August 2011
Friday 1:18 am
1739 spacer
And who put the thermite there and how? And how did they achieve it completely unnoticed. And why can't we have some samples of the residue displayed for all to see, with pictures and a detailed molecular analysis rather than the hearsay videos of "oh they found nano thermite"
>> No. 1741 Anonymous
19th August 2011
Friday 7:49 am
1741 spacer
>>1739

That discussion and information is available elsewhere. It's about a fifteen minute video about one experiment by one man. Don't be stupid or unreasonable.
>> No. 1744 Anonymous
19th August 2011
Friday 2:02 pm
1744 spacer
>>1741
Where it is it available. All the videos I've ever been pointed to regarding this theory have never covered any of these points.
>> No. 1745 Anonymous
19th August 2011
Friday 3:37 pm
1745 spacer
>>1744

You must have been given the dross instead of the more interesting videos then, sadly. I don't see how it could have been so overlooked otherwise. It's not too hard to find if you go out looking for it, thankfully. You just need to keep an eye out for the better quality like the OP one.

https://www.youtube.com/v/lESol88wOi0

That's a small segment that covers these things in some variety, including the later parts with the dust and residue being found, pictured and identified. This is a condensed version too, so you can find more in depth to suit your tastes, but more than enough to get anyone started on that search if they want to.
>> No. 1776 Anonymous
28th September 2011
Wednesday 6:29 pm
1776 spacer
Oh, look, yet another 9/11 crackpot who seems to think physics has anything to do with it.
>> No. 1777 Anonymous
28th September 2011
Wednesday 7:54 pm
1777 spacer
>>1776

25/12

A+++++++++, would read again.
>> No. 1778 Anonymous
29th September 2011
Thursday 4:42 am
1778 spacer
>>1700
Mmm, crumbly chocolate cake. Looks delicious OP.
>> No. 1779 Anonymous
29th September 2011
Thursday 1:08 pm
1779 spacer
>>1776
Fuck, got me the best possible post number for that. But yeah, all these crazies that go on about the temperature of jet fuel or how thermite could cut steel are missing the 600lb gorilla in the room - the logistics of supposed conspiracy.
>> No. 1780 Anonymous
29th September 2011
Thursday 2:20 pm
1780 spacer
>>1779

Mixed metaphors there, lad. They are not missing the "600lb gorilla" or even the elephant in the room. You're just ignorant to to the discussion going on. Plenty people have talked about these things. If you haven't read them then you haven't tried looking, no excuse for that if you choose to wade into a debate and make grand pronoucements that everyone is wrong.

It's also a really retarded and weak counter in general considering the long human history of real conspiracies, terrorist acts, government and private wrong doing, etc. It's an argument from a position of ignorance. "I don't know anything about this or exactly how it could work so it is impossble for anyone!!". Brain surgery can't happen because it is complicated. Inventing the television mus not have happened because it is complicated. The invasion of Germany must not have happened because it is complicated. With such keen insight as yours we can dismiss half the globe and its history, at the least.

>>1776

Yes, imagine trying to use physics and other sciences to sovle a mystery. Rational discussion, science and experiments. How crazy! We should use chicken guts to scry for message from the gods or ask someone trustworthy like a politician to pat us on the head and spoonfeed us. Oh dear.
>> No. 1781 Anonymous
29th September 2011
Thursday 3:54 pm
1781 spacer
>>1780
Nice straw man you have there.

>Yes, imagine trying to use physics and other sciences to sovle a mystery.Rational discussion, science and experiments.
I can imagine that. Shame that's not what truthers do, though. You can't have rational discussion with truthers because they arrive at the debate pre-retarded.

Speeding case as conducted by CPS using reason and logic:
>Your vehicle was spotted on the M1 doing 85mph
>The officer in the car identified you as the driver
>You must have been speeding

Speeding case as conducted by truthers:
>You own a vehicle capable of over 100mph
>You must have been speeding
>> No. 1782 Anonymous
29th September 2011
Thursday 4:12 pm
1782 spacer
>>1781

>You can't have rational discussion with truthers because they arrive at the debate pre-retarded.

This is particularly true. They've decided to believe in something, rather than gone through any logical steps to reach a conclusion. And they spend far too long on terrible websites, desperately seeking some sort of validation of their awful opinions.

But it doesn't matter, because nobody takes them seriously.
>> No. 1783 Anonymous
29th September 2011
Thursday 4:44 pm
1783 spacer
>>1782
I did hear one of truther who had the audacity to first argue his point, then suggest that anyone who disagreed with him wasn't qualified to discuss the matter. You really couldn't make this sort of shit up.

I did have one guy tell me that I'd been brainwashed by the mainstream media and shouldn't believe anything I read in the papers. I pointed out to him that as a Britisher I'm already well-used to not believing anything I read in the papers.
>> No. 1784 Anonymous
29th September 2011
Thursday 4:48 pm
1784 spacer
>>1783

And obviously, rather than believing anything in the papers, you definitely should trust blogs, websites, and forums with animated .gifs of spinning skulls.
>> No. 1790 Anonymous
7th October 2011
Friday 9:07 am
1790 spacer
>>1784

The best thing to come out of 'nine eleven' is the phrase 'INSAHD JARB!'.
>> No. 1804 Anonymous
11th October 2011
Tuesday 11:19 pm
1804 spacer
The CIA did 9/11, and make no mistake about it. Poor Allende didn't know what hit him. 9/11/73 NEVAR FORGET

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password