[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
healthy

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 4054)
Message
File  []
close
10868038_1529105117337208_2666283454050468255_n.jpg
405440544054
>> No. 4054 Anonymous
27th November 2016
Sunday 4:31 am
4054 spacer
I just wrote a little program that took the average of all the 1RM formulas on the wiki page. It looks quite good.

1: 100
2: 94
3: 91
4: 89
5: 87
6: 84
7: 82
8: 80
9: 78
10: 76
11: 74
12: 73
13: 71
14: 69
15: 67
16: 66
17: 64
18: 62
19: 61
20: 59
Expand all images.
>> No. 4055 Anonymous
27th November 2016
Sunday 11:21 am
4055 spacer
Formulae.
>> No. 4056 Anonymous
27th November 2016
Sunday 11:24 am
4056 spacer
>>4055

gtfo
>> No. 4057 Anonymous
27th November 2016
Sunday 12:52 pm
4057 spacer
>>4056

Lad.
>> No. 4058 Anonymous
27th November 2016
Sunday 12:59 pm
4058 spacer
>>4056
Don't worry, one of the security blokes mods would come and get rid of you!
>> No. 4059 Anonymous
28th November 2016
Monday 12:25 am
4059 spacer
>>4055

In the code it says "formulas", so there.

from math import exp epley = lambda x: 1 + x / 30 brzycki = lambda x: 36 / (37 - x) mcGlothin = lambda x: 100 / (101.3 - x * 2.67123) lombardi = lambda x: x ** 0.1 mayhew = lambda x: 100 / (52.2 + exp(x * -0.055) * 41.9 ) oConner = lambda x: 1 + x / 40 wathan = lambda x: 100 / (48.8 + exp(x * -0.075) * 53.8) formulas = [epley, brzycki, mcGlothin, lombardi, mayhew, oConner, wathan] print(' 1: 100') for i in range(2, 21): factor = sum(fn(i) for fn in formulas) / len(formulas) print('%2d: %.0f' % (i, 100 / factor))

>> No. 4060 Anonymous
28th November 2016
Monday 9:09 am
4060 spacer
>>4059
Doesn't make it any less wrong does it? A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.
>> No. 4061 Anonymous
28th November 2016
Monday 9:19 pm
4061 spacer
>>4059
That is very nice. Who are we waiting for exactly?
>> No. 4062 Anonymous
28th November 2016
Monday 9:26 pm
4062 spacer
>>4061
"Weighting" surely?
>> No. 4064 Anonymous
29th November 2016
Tuesday 1:34 am
4064 spacer
>>4061

What do you mean? I prints out predicted percentages of 1RM for reps up to 20.
>> No. 4067 Anonymous
29th November 2016
Tuesday 3:06 am
4067 spacer
Since the values are only approximate this table is good enough.

1: 100
2: 95
3: 90
5: 85
8: 80
10: 75
12: 70
15: 65
20: 60
>> No. 4068 Anonymous
29th November 2016
Tuesday 8:47 am
4068 spacer
>>4054
Which wiki page are you referring to?
>> No. 4070 Anonymous
29th November 2016
Tuesday 12:35 pm
4070 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-repetition_maximum
>>4068
>> No. 4071 Anonymous
29th November 2016
Tuesday 1:29 pm
4071 spacer
>>4070
For some reason I can't click your link. Do you know what I'm doing wrong?
>> No. 4072 Anonymous
29th November 2016
Tuesday 4:36 pm
4072 spacer
>>4071

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-repetition_maximum
>> No. 4073 Anonymous
29th November 2016
Tuesday 6:49 pm
4073 spacer
>>4072>>4070
Well I never. I honestly thought this thread was some sort of secret recruiting test for GCHQ.
>> No. 4074 Anonymous
29th November 2016
Tuesday 8:50 pm
4074 spacer
>>4073
It is.
>> No. 4075 Anonymous
30th November 2016
Wednesday 12:00 am
4075 spacer

1RM Standards.jpg
407540754075
>>4073
Well how silly of them. They must know that weightlifters are dunderheaded morons who won't have the mathematical skills to see through puzzles like that. A better recruiting test would probably be an arm wrestling match with someone who is of a similar height, weight and 1rm standard.
>> No. 4076 Anonymous
1st December 2016
Thursday 12:47 am
4076 spacer

Samuel Beckett.jpg
407640764076
>>4061

LOL I just got it.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password