[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
science

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 4291)
Message
File  []
close
Venus_of_Willendorf.jpg
429142914291
>> No. 4291 Anonymous
28th November 2017
Tuesday 12:40 pm
4291 spacer
How did people 25,000 years ago know what fat women look like?

It seems people were pretty well-fed back then.
Expand all images.
>> No. 4292 Anonymous
28th November 2017
Tuesday 1:12 pm
4292 spacer
They drank reindeer piss and went on a vision quest to your mum's house.
>> No. 4294 Anonymous
28th November 2017
Tuesday 1:14 pm
4294 spacer
Your mum's mass is so great she bends light 25,000 years into the past.
>> No. 4295 Anonymous
28th November 2017
Tuesday 1:15 pm
4295 spacer
Maybe she was a novelty like a freak show.

People would come from miles around to see her and to throw mammoth (in both senses) pies at her. And they sold little Venuses in the gift shop. Maybe It was like an educational trip for the kids where they learned about nutrition, why you shouldn't eat too much and where food comes from, they had probably had one of those interactive workshops to demonstrate how to make flour from grass.
>> No. 4296 Anonymous
28th November 2017
Tuesday 1:37 pm
4296 spacer
Probably women of breeding stock were well looked after, and might not have had to do much other than sit around and have kids. Food was plentiful then, just more difficult to catch.

This would explain the link with fertility.
>> No. 4297 Anonymous
28th November 2017
Tuesday 2:39 pm
4297 spacer
>>4296

It's also possible they had thyroid problems. Not that they'd have known what that meant.
>> No. 4298 Anonymous
28th November 2017
Tuesday 2:39 pm
4298 spacer
There's a name for the gene that's responsible for the big arses on certain races of black people but I don't know what it is.
>> No. 4299 Anonymous
28th November 2017
Tuesday 3:06 pm
4299 spacer

Dream Big.jpg
429942994299
>It seems people were pretty well-fed back then.

Well they were. Remember that we're talking about unspoiled wilderness, stories of early fishermen in the Americas having giant fish practically jumping in their boat and mammoth size lobsters are not just tall tales. Even today the few remaining hunter-gatherer societies living on pretty inhospitable land only need to work a few hours a day.

You can think of humanity in the late Paleolithic as a post-scarcity society in terms of food. Grandparents also emerge to help care for the kids beginning the time honoured tradition of fucking them off to the parents over the weekend while you go carve erotic statues with ridiculous proportions.
>> No. 4300 Anonymous
28th November 2017
Tuesday 3:12 pm
4300 spacer
I saw this article recently, which suggests (with photo evidence) that such figures may be distored because they were made from the point of view of pregnant women looking at their own bodies.

https://steemit.com/science/@deeallen/self-portraits-of-fertility-symbols-venus-figurines-of-upper-paleolithic-eurasia-nudity

Another reason could be that they were idealised versions of women (i.e. this is what the people making them considered most attractive even if such people rarely existed).
>> No. 4301 Anonymous
28th November 2017
Tuesday 3:55 pm
4301 spacer

Lucy_van_Pelt.png
430143014301
>>4300
>Another reason could be that they were idealised versions of women (i.e. this is what the people making them considered most attractive even if such people rarely existed).

I feel like at this point analysis becomes invalid and is just projecting. It would be like if someone found a peanuts cartoon in a thousand years and decided Lucy's must be an idealized version of femininity the people of the 20th century held. Surely it is more logical to assume pure artistry, or incompetence of an individual then that a wobbly bobbly figurine represented a paragon of the society of the time.
>> No. 4302 Anonymous
28th November 2017
Tuesday 5:36 pm
4302 spacer
>>4299

Jesus, I... Phwoar. I've never got this turned on by an inanimate object. It's perfect.
>> No. 4303 Anonymous
28th November 2017
Tuesday 6:03 pm
4303 spacer

ee9f6eeec80a00d15d46defea46b7a11.jpg
430343034303
>>4301
If Lucy actually met the objective criteria of fertility you might have something but she doesn't. Yes, archeology has some guesswork and common sense involved but, frankly I don't care what time period you're from, if you're over the age of 25 and going 'ugh' to curvy women you don't have a dick.
>> No. 4304 Anonymous
28th November 2017
Tuesday 6:15 pm
4304 spacer
>>4303

You missed his point by a mile there lad.
>> No. 4305 Anonymous
28th November 2017
Tuesday 8:17 pm
4305 spacer
>>4303

If pic related is what you call curvy then I'm sorry lad, you're already well into fetish territory.

Yes, I know it's shopped.
>> No. 4306 Anonymous
28th November 2017
Tuesday 8:50 pm
4306 spacer
>>4305

It's shopped? Oh bollocks.
>> No. 4307 Anonymous
28th November 2017
Tuesday 8:52 pm
4307 spacer

65427ead64bd91b691348632900cb290--big-is-beautiful.jpg
430743074307
>>4306
Not by a great deal
>> No. 4308 Anonymous
28th November 2017
Tuesday 11:24 pm
4308 spacer
>>4307

PHWOAR!
>> No. 4310 Anonymous
29th November 2017
Wednesday 1:46 am
4310 spacer
>>4304

Of course because he has an overwhelming irrational insecurity about his attraction to fat chicks he has to mentions how it is unnatural not to like them with no prompting what so ever. Because really he is seeking validation for something he doesn't feel comfortable with.

>>4303
>objective criteria of fertility

I don't think you have any understanding of the word objective. There is nothing objectively fertile about a figurine, or an obviously edited photo, that a cartoon drawing doesn't hold, they are all barren mate. You can jizz on any of them as much as you like they won't get prego. They are all objectively infertile.

I could equally show you a really hot likable tranny and fugly disease ridden cis unlikable woman. One of them is objectively fertile the one isn’t. The fact on of them is objectively fertile and the other isn’t wouldn’t influence your ideal of beauty.
>> No. 4311 Anonymous
29th November 2017
Wednesday 2:23 pm
4311 spacer
>>4307
I have no say in this discussion but I would like to request sauce on that woman please. Thank you.
>> No. 4312 Anonymous
29th November 2017
Wednesday 2:54 pm
4312 spacer
>>4311

I'm sure there are many sauces but the one she probably prefers is full fat mayonnaise.
>> No. 4313 Anonymous
29th November 2017
Wednesday 3:29 pm
4313 spacer

nadia aboulhosn.png
431343134313
>>4311
>> No. 4314 Anonymous
29th November 2017
Wednesday 7:14 pm
4314 spacer
>>4313
I bet she can't wipe her own arse.
>> No. 4315 Anonymous
29th November 2017
Wednesday 7:18 pm
4315 spacer
>>4310
Right, big hips aren't an indicator of fertility.
>> No. 4316 Anonymous
29th November 2017
Wednesday 7:20 pm
4316 spacer
>>4314
I'd wipe her arse, IYKWIM.
>> No. 4317 Anonymous
29th November 2017
Wednesday 7:22 pm
4317 spacer
>>4316
Scat fetishists are weird.
>> No. 4318 Anonymous
29th November 2017
Wednesday 7:29 pm
4318 spacer

12aeb26441256285eb4cf8db4ba0879e--nadia-aboulhosn-.jpg
431843184318
>>4314
I reckon she does the under method. Curious to note that the last thread on /x/ concerning this highly scientific topic just became a cunt-off.
>> No. 4319 Anonymous
29th November 2017
Wednesday 8:22 pm
4319 spacer
>>4315

objectively no. Hip structure sure, but that isn't what you are arguing for, you are arguing for fat chicks, You just like fat chicks, which is fine, but don't act like there is some sort of great wisdom to it.
>> No. 4320 Anonymous
29th November 2017
Wednesday 10:54 pm
4320 spacer
>>4319
Let's face it, really mate, he likes fat chicks (which is almost all chicks, especially in Swindon), and you like little kids.
>> No. 4321 Anonymous
29th November 2017
Wednesday 10:56 pm
4321 spacer
>>4318
I'm not going to lie, I love fat birds. Especially ethnic ones, but I always feel disgusted after the fact because I'm sure they can't wipe their own arse. It's like the recoil you feel after having a wank x10.
>> No. 4322 Anonymous
30th November 2017
Thursday 9:18 am
4322 spacer
>>4299
Sneaky.
>> No. 4323 Anonymous
30th November 2017
Thursday 12:01 pm
4323 spacer
>>4320

Oh I understand the problem, you think only women who can't wipe their own arses can be sexy.

No that isn't a prerequite for me, so their are loads of women I like that aren't either of those.
>> No. 4324 Anonymous
30th November 2017
Thursday 4:12 pm
4324 spacer

bec_prev_07.jpg
432443244324
>>4319

Liking fat girls is like a cheat code for life, because you get the pick of the litter. You're absolutely spoiled for choice.
>> No. 4325 Anonymous
30th November 2017
Thursday 4:33 pm
4325 spacer
>>4324
> you get the pick of the litter

I dunno, lad. There's a lot of chubby chasers out there. I know a few fat lasses who have quite high opinions of themselves, despite them being far from lookers, because of the number of blubber worshippers after them.

Quite a few people I went to school with have ended up with single mums, who'd usually be well out of their league if it wasn't for the whole having a child thing.
>> No. 4326 Anonymous
30th November 2017
Thursday 4:58 pm
4326 spacer
>>4324
>you get the pick of the litter
As the owner of a house cat I can say this is not much of an advantage.
>> No. 4327 Anonymous
30th November 2017
Thursday 5:17 pm
4327 spacer
>>4325

I've said this before, but it's just bravado from a vocal minority. Conventionally attractive people don't bang on about body confidence, because it goes without saying. It's a different story at chucking-out time in Spoons or the dog-end of Tinder.

25% of the British population are obese. I don't know what proportion of men are chubby chasers, but it's nowhere near one in four. Fat women are used to being approached by blokes who are obviously desperate and embarrassed. You get an enormous amount of credit for being neither of those things.
>> No. 4328 Anonymous
30th November 2017
Thursday 6:21 pm
4328 spacer
>>4319
It seems you don't understand that curvy doesn't mean obese. It's perfectly possible for God to curse a woman in such a way that she has neither arse, hips nor tits regardless of bodyweight.

What's it like falling for the propaganda?
>> No. 4329 Anonymous
30th November 2017
Thursday 9:04 pm
4329 spacer
>>4328

Curvy isn't obese but some obese women use curvy as an excuse for being a fatty. Curvy isn't unhealthy but being obese is.
>> No. 4330 Anonymous
30th November 2017
Thursday 9:38 pm
4330 spacer

cromag.jpg
433043304330
>>4291

That is one chunky Cro Magnon with no arms, how did we evolve
>> No. 4331 Anonymous
30th November 2017
Thursday 9:54 pm
4331 spacer
>>4292

BISMILLAH

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHH4r-j7zPw
>> No. 4332 Anonymous
30th November 2017
Thursday 11:03 pm
4332 spacer
>>4328

I understand it perfectly, but most obese people don't.
>> No. 4333 Anonymous
1st December 2017
Friday 1:04 am
4333 spacer
>>4331
Back a bit early from the SU aren't you m7?
>> No. 4334 Anonymous
1st December 2017
Friday 1:06 am
4334 spacer
>>4328

Why blame a made up sky fairy on genetic diversity

>It's perfectly possible for God to curse a woman

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nIRJVmZ4K8
>> No. 4335 Anonymous
1st December 2017
Friday 1:10 am
4335 spacer
>>4333

Nah blud been growin a beard an listenin Stormzy
>> No. 4407 Anonymous
21st May 2018
Monday 11:06 pm
4407 spacer
>>4291
I'm getting a little sweaty under the old helmet here lads ooohhh ddddearrrr she's larger than average in my mind.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password