It looks fine, maybe a bit tight but that's more a matter of comfort.

Reckon you've got it on too tight. That tightness is going to make your arm swell. That swelling will make the watch face seem even smaller. You're your own worst enemy.

I like it. A lot of men's watches are large but it doesn't look odd.

Yep, it looks fine but you've got it on too tight.

>>5064
>>5065
>>5066
>>5067

Thanks, chaps. I've decided to slacken the strap and wear the watch further up towards my wrist rather than having it strangled half-way up my arm. There's a very noticeable difference.

Tomorrow on .gs: Which way out do my socks go, and do I wear them under the shoe?

>>5070
Over the shoe if it's winter.
http://www.decodedscience.com/2010-physics-ig-nobel-physics-preventing-winter-slips-falls/38500

That's a really nice watch. Oversized faces are a bit cartoonish, in my view. Timex?

>>5072
Agreed.

People who wear huge watches either have an over inflated ego or they're completely short sighted.

>>5073
4.5D shortsightedlad here. It's handy having an oversized face I can read without my specs on.

Don't any of you people have phones?

>>5075
Not attached to our wrists, no.

>>5075
My other half's a secondary school teacher. They now have to have digital clocks alongside the analogue ones because many of the kids struggle comprehending the latter. The GCSE results for the school are well above the national average, too.

>>5077

I've never been able to read analogue clocks. I don't think it has anything to do with intelligence. At least, I'd like to.

>>5078

I wouldn't count being able to look at two lines pointing at two numbers as an intelligent task.

>>5072

It's a Swiss watch. Made by Mondaine, famous for their railway clocks. Cost me £25!

>>5079

It's a dyspraxia thing. I've only recently managed to get the hang of putting forks on the left or right.

>>5081

Where were you putting them before? Below it?

I've got this sucker here, it goes with a lot of clothing, the metal doesn't look gash - and it has some nice nostalgia / retro points.

£28 in Argos, and I've gotten a ream of compliments, particularly by my Asian co-worker who exclaimed that it's very fancy and iconic. I quickly corrected any ideas that it's real gold, much to their disappointment.

>>5063
I like the look of that. I've been looking for a simple watch, nothing fancy, but for some reason they're hard to find at a reasonable price.

>>5083

Well done, you've impressed a first generation immigrant. What are you going to do next? Not die of cholera?

>>5085
Not dying of cholera sounds like a pretty good idea to me. >>5083, don't die of cholera. Not even to spite >>5085.

>>5085
Sounds like no one has given you a hug. Cheer up.

>>5085
I'll steer clear of the Broad Street pump from now on.

>>5082
No, jus on the wrong sides.

>>5063

The same watch is for sale on eBay:

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/M-Watch-Maxi-Unisex-Resin-Date-Watch-A661MMA-22020BI-/281793629397?hash=item419c358cd5

Sorry for dragging up a year-old post, chaps.

All watches look stupid. Just look at your phone.

>>5305
Yeah but then what will you do if you're walking through a park and muggerlad asks you for the time?

>>5305

Really odd attitude, this one. There are a few practical reasons why having a watch and a phone is a good idea (it's easier to look at your wrist than to take out and unlock your phone, for example), but putting those aside sometimes it is nice to have single purpose items.

>>5306
"I dunno mate"

>>5307
Most phones that I'm aware of don't require unlocking to see the time. If it takes significantly longer for you to get a phone out of a pocket than to raise your wrist and look at it, your hands are too fat or your pockets are too small.

>>5308
Chances are your watch is worth less. Unless you have a shit phone, in which case your mugger will be royally pissed off.

>>5309
By that I mean you tell your potential mugger that you don't know and walk on. That seems to work for me.