[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
film/video

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply [Last 50 posts]
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 20473)
Message
File  []
close
Startrek.png
204732047320473
>> No. 20473 Anonymous
8th March 2016
Tuesday 8:00 pm
20473 Star Trek
If anyone's interested, Voyager and TNG are continually playing at http://vaughnlive.tv/downlorrd .

Also general Star Trek thread, what do you think of the new movies? What setting would you want a new series to be in?
86 posts omitted. Last 50 posts shown. Expand all images.
>> No. 22053 Anonymous
25th January 2018
Thursday 7:01 pm
22053 spacer
>>22050

It may just grow the beard yet. New ST series are never very good to start with.
>> No. 22054 Anonymous
27th January 2018
Saturday 2:45 pm
22054 spacer

048dc57b2bd5ba6beed39fa60cb3dadf3b7e09bf58a2f4690c.gif
220542205422054
>>22052
I'm confused, is the episode with Dax kissing her/his ex-wife not counted because it was the symbiont acting?
>> No. 22055 Anonymous
27th January 2018
Saturday 6:57 pm
22055 spacer
>>22054

You are right, I knew it was DS9 but I forgot which episode it was.
>> No. 22056 Anonymous
27th January 2018
Saturday 7:52 pm
22056 spacer
I watched a couple of episodes yesterday and I'm curious, where should I start watching ST from and in what order?
>> No. 22057 Anonymous
28th January 2018
Sunday 10:59 am
22057 spacer
>>22055
I would never have pointed it out but RLM used it as well so I was wondering if some new classification was going on what with us living in the future and all.

>>22056
If you can stomach mid-60s sci-fi on a shoestring budget then do the release order (it helps to warm up with the 1959 Twilight Zone):
http://startreklist.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/list-of-all-star-trek-episodes-sorted_05.html

Otherwise start on TNG. Most people (wrongly) suggest doing it by series which is simpler but forgets that the broadcast order exists. This looks complicated but things will never be as good again:

1) Start with the TNG episode 'Darmok' to give you a taste of peak Trek because the first season or two is going to be a struggle.
2) Watch solely TNG from the pilot* until S6E11 (the second episode of Picard talking about lights) and then alternate episodes with DS9 starting with the pilot.
3) TNG will end. Watch the VII movie Generations and continue DS9 up until the episode where Quark finds a baby then alternate with VOY episodes.
4) Before S5E6 of DS9 watch the TOS episode 'The Trouble with Tribbles' then watch the episode - trust me it is a really cool episode and I can't think of any other franchises that have done what this does.
5) After S5E8 of DS9 watch the VIII movie First Contact (important for main plot).
6) After S7E9 of DS9 watch IX movie Insurrection (movie plot motivation improved)
6) DS9 will end, VOY will end. Watch the X movie Nemesis then ENT from the pilot onwards. Feel a void in your life and start watching TOS.

*The movies can generally be watched at your own leisure up until VI and all aside from V and maybe I are high-quality (VI may seem essential but Roddenberry didn't consider it rigid canon). I'd recommend watching all the movies up to VI before S6E4 of TNG but I understand it is a tall order.

Note: Aside from TOS all series of Star Trek start pretty bad; TNG gets good when Riker grows a beard, DS9 gets good when Sisko loses his hair, VOY gets good when you meet 7of9, ENT gets good when American elections become more unpredictable. Keep the faith.
Note 2: There is an animated series but its not canon. Watch it after TOS if you want.

Games: Star Trek: 25th Anniversary and it's sequel Judgment Rites are legitimately good games and nicely conclude TOS. The last mission (if done right) perfectly sums up the message of ST come to think of it.
>> No. 22058 Anonymous
28th January 2018
Sunday 12:33 pm
22058 spacer
>>22057
I've seen the Darmok episode and all of the original TZ run so I'll go with the release order, thanks for the tip.
>> No. 22355 Anonymous
17th June 2018
Sunday 5:22 am
22355 spacer
So I tried bumping this thread the other day and messed it up, but here goes nothing.

Isn't Star Trek Discovery fucking grim. It's like a bad acid trip, space looks like Dadaist nightmarescape and everyone's a prick, what happened to the Federation's utopian society? And now there's terrorist Vulcans?! It's so depressing. Was watching TOS in the sixties this upsetting?

Careful on any spoilerino's, I'm only on episode six.
>> No. 22356 Anonymous
17th June 2018
Sunday 5:55 am
22356 spacer
>>22355

Your spoiler text is definately the most offensive point of the whole series paticularly the label they are given. I found discovery more indearing in the secound half but I might have been punch drunk from how awful the first half was I'd be willing to accept anything that was remotely reasonable.
>> No. 22357 Anonymous
18th June 2018
Monday 3:11 pm
22357 spacer

1529162354942.jpg
223572235722357
There's so much cannibalism.
>> No. 22358 Anonymous
19th June 2018
Tuesday 1:12 am
22358 spacer
>>22355
It's all... "gritty". If you pretend it's not Star Trek it's a resonable SciFi series but it does lack the promise of utopia, there within grasping distance even if enternally out of reach, that the series up until ST:V had.
>> No. 22359 Anonymous
19th June 2018
Tuesday 3:57 am
22359 spacer
>>22358
That's my big problem with Discovery, it's "not Star Trek", which is fine, except they call it Star Trek so I'm constantly second guessing it against my own expectations. Maybe they should have done a Mass Effect TV show or something, then you can be as bleak, sleezy and sarcastic as you want. Michael would have made a good Renegade Shep, to be honest.

Anyway, I liked the mirror universe and the characters are mostly quite good. It just rang very, very hollow when they decided genocide against the entire Klingon homeworld was not-exactly-cricket as far as the Federation was concerned, and I can't see that lady Klingon lasting long in charge, "holding the planet hostage with a bomb its enemies put there" isn't a win for the ideas of Klingon Jesus.

Lense flares and dutch angles aren't my idea of great cinematography either. THERE'S SO MANY LIGHTS EVERYWHERE IT HURTS MY POOR BRAIN!
>> No. 22360 Anonymous
20th June 2018
Wednesday 9:52 pm
22360 spacer
>>20481
>Its a shame that it got canned as soon as it was finding its feet despite most Trek needing 3 seasons to find its feet.

I think all Trek seasons have their good and bad episodes, season 2 of Voyager simultaneously has both my favourite (Death Wish 9/10) and most hated (Twisted 1/10, Threshold 1/10) Voyager episodes.
>> No. 22361 Anonymous
23rd June 2018
Saturday 9:53 pm
22361 spacer

Discovery Blue.png
223612236122361
>>22359
>Lense flares and dutch angles aren't my idea of great cinematography either.

Speaking of cinematography, why are the ships in Discovery so blue?
>> No. 22362 Anonymous
23rd June 2018
Saturday 10:22 pm
22362 spacer
>>22361
I'm not sure, but in fairness they did mention that the Terrans are photosensitive and prefer the dark.
>> No. 22363 Anonymous
23rd June 2018
Saturday 10:23 pm
22363 spacer
>>22361
The alternative is orange, and who wants to work in an orange ship?
>> No. 22364 Anonymous
24th June 2018
Sunday 10:30 pm
22364 spacer
>>22363
The alternative is normal just like in TNG/DS9/VOY/ENT.
>> No. 22365 Anonymous
24th June 2018
Sunday 11:02 pm
22365 spacer
>>22364
Those were all made back in the days when colours other than orange or blue were still acceptable.
>> No. 22366 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 5:44 pm
22366 spacer
http://www.startrek.com/fan-films

CBS and Paramount Pictures have unreasonable restrictions on fan fiction.

>The fan production must be less than 15 minutes for a single self-contained story, or no more than 2 segments, episodes or parts, not to exceed 30 minutes total, with no additional seasons, episodes, parts, sequels or remakes.

>The fan production must be family friendly and suitable for public presentation. Videos must not include profanity, nudity, obscenity, pornography, depictions of drugs, alcohol, tobacco, or any harmful or illegal activity, or any material that is offensive, fraudulent, defamatory, libelous, disparaging, sexually explicit, threatening, hateful, or any other inappropriate content. The content of the fan production cannot violate any individual’s right of privacy.
>> No. 22367 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 6:16 pm
22367 spacer
>>22366
In what way do you consider those particular clauses to be unreasonable?
>> No. 22368 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 6:27 pm
22368 spacer
>>22367
Because it ruins his idea for a story, where Troy and Crusher are beamed down to a planet to provide medical aid and counselling to some stranded chaps, but get brutally gang raped.
>> No. 22369 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 6:59 pm
22369 spacer
>>22368
>Because it ruins his idea for a story, where Troy and Crusher are beamed down to a planet to provide medical aid and counselling to some stranded chaps, but get brutally gang raped.
You missed the part where the gang-rape takes 19 minutes.
>> No. 22371 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 8:01 pm
22371 spacer
>>22369
I'm not sure anyone's ever produced a 19-minute gang-rape scene before, on video or in animation. At least, based on what I've been told.
>> No. 22372 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 8:08 pm
22372 spacer
>>22371

I have a collection that would disprove this greatly.
>> No. 22373 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 9:28 pm
22373 spacer
>>22372

Ah! I see you are well versed in Japanese culture.
>> No. 22427 Anonymous
1st September 2018
Saturday 2:31 am
22427 Star Trek Friends
Does anyone want to watch and rate TNG with me? I've just started season 6, they're all on Netflix.

I am disabled and have no friends so it would be much appreciated. I've been through and rated all of Voyager so we can discuss those, and I might re-watch and rate all of DS9.
>> No. 22428 Anonymous
1st September 2018
Saturday 9:13 am
22428 spacer
>>22427
Sort a way for us to watch and I will.
>> No. 22429 Anonymous
1st September 2018
Saturday 12:10 pm
22429 spacer
>>22428
There's an app for that.
>> No. 22430 Anonymous
2nd September 2018
Sunday 2:50 pm
22430 spacer
>>22427
I'm just doing a TNG rewatch at the minute actually. I know every episode back to front but I've not actually seen the blu-ray edits before and I'm totally blown away by how bright and clear everything is.

I'd definitely be up for some kind of discussion (here or elsewhere) about any episode of Trek (except Discovery) whenever really. I have a lot of free time and I ate, slept and breathed my old VHS tapes of TNG in particular from as far back as I can remember.
>> No. 22476 Anonymous
29th October 2018
Monday 12:03 pm
22476 spacer

Cirroc_Lofton.png
224762247622476
This is what Jake Sisko looks like now. Bit weird, innit?
>> No. 22477 Anonymous
29th October 2018
Monday 12:28 pm
22477 spacer
>>22476
Not really, but he does look like he's trying to be Avery Brooks Jnr, but I can't think of a good reason not to.
>> No. 22479 Anonymous
29th October 2018
Monday 1:56 pm
22479 spacer
>>22476

Only in that he is immortalised as a teenager in my mind.
>> No. 22531 Anonymous
19th January 2019
Saturday 12:03 pm
22531 spacer

star-trek-discovery-season-2-l-rell-1140177-1280x0.jpg
225312253122531
So has anyone else been watch watching STD lately or are we collectively ignoring it?
>> No. 22532 Anonymous
19th January 2019
Saturday 5:10 pm
22532 spacer
>>22531

Everyone in that series is awful, except for T'kuvma.
>> No. 22533 Anonymous
21st January 2019
Monday 2:50 pm
22533 spacer
>>22531
Why watch it when the Orville is so much better?
>> No. 22534 Anonymous
21st January 2019
Monday 7:14 pm
22534 spacer
>>22532
Why T'kuvma? Initially his motivations were coherent but his whole arc became horribly convoluted.

>>22533
Because I can watch both. This season of Orville hasn't been good either for that matter.
>> No. 22538 Anonymous
29th January 2019
Tuesday 4:13 pm
22538 spacer
>>22531

Season 2 is creating yet more inaccuracies as far as canon is concerned - I wish CBS would just admit that it's a separate continuity instead of stubbornly insisting it's Prime Universe and randomly throwing in elements from TOS as if that fixes everything. Burnham is still the absolute worst character, I'm genuinely struggling to understand why she is still wearing a uniform when she is STILL regularly disobeying direct orders. Tilly is the only highlight for me, especially now she's put a bit more weight on, but even her appeal is waning. There's a rumour going around the show has been cancelled, I for one am hoping it's true. Star Trek? Shit Trek.

The Orville, however, continues to excel.
>> No. 22539 Anonymous
29th January 2019
Tuesday 4:57 pm
22539 spacer
>>22538
Other than the spore drive being retarded, annoys me greatly, what else breaks canon? I'm struggling to think what you mean, but at a guess.

The Enterprise went on at least two 5 year missions before Kirk even set foot on board and Pike is the 3rd person to captain her, so it appearing is fine.

The event which altered Klingon DNA and made them all homogeneous hasn't happened yet, which is why they're so varied. Prime timeline Klingons do appear in the rear of several scenes in season one though.

Uh, mirror universe? Regardless, there has never been a series of Trek with a good Season 1. Hopefully it turns things around, as every other Trek has turned it around by the end of Season 2 and are well loved. Even Enterprise.
>> No. 22540 Anonymous
29th January 2019
Tuesday 6:44 pm
22540 spacer
>>22539

Spock never had an adopted human sister. Season 1 showed a 'D7 Battle Cruiser' which looks nothing at all like the established one from TOS, Season 2 trailer showed the ones from TOS so that's going to confuse things even more. Pike and co have shown upnin the red, blue and yellow uniform scheme whoch they shouldn't have at that time - Kirk, Spock and co still had the uniforms from The Cage in the firat Kirk episode. Discovery herself is wayyyy too big or advanced for a Starfleet ship of that era. I won't go on.
>> No. 22541 Anonymous
29th January 2019
Tuesday 7:24 pm
22541 spacer
>>22540

Honestly, for me at least, almost everything there is forgivable or ignorable. The one thing that isn't is the Discovery being so advanced. It's like watching Les Miserables but they keep stopping to check their smart phones, it simply doesn't gel.

Oh, and the entire show is pig ugly.
>> No. 22546 Anonymous
1st February 2019
Friday 5:53 pm
22546 spacer
This week, Captain Pike heroically threw himself on a Phaser set on overload AND LIVED. It should have blown a hole in his chest. Seriously, this show is a joke
>> No. 22547 Anonymous
1st February 2019
Friday 6:01 pm
22547 spacer

1413912259794_wps_6_TELEVISION_PROGRAMMES_Dad.jpg
225472254722547
>>22546
Oh Captain Pike. I was confused there for a second.
>> No. 22548 Anonymous
1st February 2019
Friday 7:34 pm
22548 spacer
>>22547

Stupid boy.
>> No. 22549 Anonymous
1st February 2019
Friday 11:55 pm
22549 spacer
>>22546

I haven't been watching but that sounds like the writing has crossed the threshold of not just being insulting to the dedicated star trek fan but insulting to everyone.
>> No. 22550 Anonymous
2nd February 2019
Saturday 12:23 am
22550 spacer

Untitled.png
225502255022550
I really liked this weeks episode of the Orville. Maybe it was just a rehash of when Data got a girlfriend but it explored the idea much further and I found it very touching how they went about it.

It could just be that I'm completely powerless over against a love-story though.

>>22546
Next week you'll make a discovery of just how bad things can really get. Then you'll remember the episode is a set-up to it's own spin-off series that you'll have to watch.

I didn't even mind the Space-Unitarians because at least the episode had some perspective to it and we got to see another crew member out of a bridge chair. There was even some mild pondering over ethical questions which more than forgives a nitpick about phaser explosions.
>> No. 22551 Anonymous
2nd February 2019
Saturday 1:02 am
22551 spacer
>>22550

>mild pondering over ethical questions

Ah yes, General Order One. Which actually ceased to apply the moment they discovered that the population were not indigenous to the planet and did have knowledge of technology, yet Pike and co were still trying to act like it still applied after that point.
>> No. 22552 Anonymous
2nd February 2019
Saturday 3:10 am
22552 spacer
I realise I'm late to the party but is The Orville literally a funny cover version of TNG?

I think I'd enjoy that, but I sort of hate Seth McFarlane, is he alright in it?
>> No. 22553 Anonymous
2nd February 2019
Saturday 9:26 am
22553 spacer
>>22552
He doesn't try to be funny much and the show is generally much less about him than it is other characters, especially compared to family guy where he voices everyone.
>> No. 22554 Anonymous
2nd February 2019
Saturday 10:21 am
22554 spacer
>>22552

He said it would be a comedy just because that was a requirement for him getting the show made. He really just wants to make tng and hired a load of the old writers.
>> No. 22555 Anonymous
2nd February 2019
Saturday 4:02 pm
22555 spacer
>>22553
>>22554

I'm not a huge fan of Seth's solo work since I think he's a bit one-dimensional and is an amateurish director (A Million Ways to Die in the West was a mess) but the fact he's taken more of a back seat and made this out of affection gets me really interested. I too absolutely love TNG. Gonna give Orville a go, lads.
>> No. 22556 Anonymous
3rd February 2019
Sunday 12:32 am
22556 spacer
>>22551
I don't see why being native would change the calculation. The Prime Directive relates to pre-warp cultures which they had become a distinct example of and their knowledge was at that point a religious myth.

Obviously their culture had already been influenced to its core by contact with a (presumably) warp civilization but after hundreds of years does that change? And what could Discovery realistically do if it did decide to intervene somewhere so far removed from the Federation beside leave shed-loads of technology and let them have at it? I think it's a judgement call and Pike was right to play it safe.

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password