>>23921
>Women of a certain age love to be busybody's and have a good moan because they have fuck all of interest actually going on in their life.

You're also forgetting that she's a 'mum-of-three'. She's not only boring but feels entitled which is why she's complaining to M&S instead of her local arse-pissing forum.

>>23923
Doughnuts are actually one of the 'healthiest' bakery goods, croissants aside. Muffins and cookies take the piss.

>but I assume the name is referring to how it's decorated, not how it tastes

I don't know why we've decided as a society that vanilla is plain, it's some fantasy universe plant taking 4 years to mature that magically flowers for 24 hours once a year. A vanilla doughnut is the best.

Mona the Vampire was shit, but it had an absolutely banging theme song.

Des from Diggit has been jailed for 10 years for rape.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/ex-childrens-tv-presenter-paul-25119319

In August he was sentenced to nine years for killing two people whilst driving coked up at over 100mph.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/kids-tv-presenter-paul-ballard-24740000

>>23990
All I can remember from Diggit was Dave The Barbarian and House Of Mouse, both of which were pretty good shows. It's sad that Des had to kill people in a car crash and rape a woman, while Fearne Cotton gets off scott free. Shows that there's no such thing as justice in this day and age.

>>23991

If they're serious about cracking down on crime, the police should be going through Fearne Cotton's contact list.

>>23991
>>23992
Is this about her dating the Lostprophets singer or her connection to taking down Britchan?

>>23991
Recess was undoubtedly the best.

>>23993
>her connection to taking down Britchan?
I never posted on Britchan. I'm too new. Can someone please summarise what happened? Did she post there? Was the Vorderman thread about her instead?

>>23996
Not to answer your question but Britchan was a bit like the American Confederacy; it lasted for all of five minutes relative to here but gets far too much remembering.

>>23997
Funposting will ride again, Chanologist.

>>23998

Ugh, the masks of shame. A lingering taint on this site's past as a few of their lot were regulars here. I imagine someone will be along shortly to talk about Heretic or The Saddo.

>>24068
Clearly nobody was going to mention it until you just did.

>>24069
That's not true I was going to but he beat me to the punch.

>>24068
>a few of their lot were regulars here

This whole website is a Chanology hub by design. We've just been suppressed by Scientology-lads starting cunt-offs about materialism and girls with willies.

I read something earlier in the month about a CBBC presenter, who also ran a dog walking business, getting convicted of making beastiality porn. I'm guessing they're not going to address this on air, but I remember it being such a big deal when Richard Bacon was caught smoking weed and had to apologise for it.

>>24072

Grim.

I always wonder about deviants like zoophiles and pedos, how do they operate their little secret networks? Do they have some form of secret code word like bumders used to have polari?

I suppose there's the dark web these days, but there have always been bumders and dog fuckers.

>>24073
Have you never noticed how you get those groups of dog-walkers in the park? I reckon If you fancied doing some lab work you'd just need to find a perverted circle. Maybe slip it into conversation and see how it goes.

Good god is this how I'm going to spend my Saturday.

>>24072
Wasn't it cocaine?
>(No, it was definitely Richard Bacon)
You know what I mean.

Anyway, I went looking for this news story, and:
https://www.starsandstyle.co.uk/celeb-news/former-cbbc-presenter-pleads-guilty-to-possessing-extreme-animal-porn/
>Former CBBC presenter pleads responsible to possessing excessive animal porn
How much is "excessive"? Is it okay to fuck a dog, but only once? Or is any animal bigger than a guinea pig deemed "excessive", so kittens are out but you can do the mouse-bumming thing and that's fine?

>>24075

Who the fuck wrote that article? It sounds like a report done by aliens, or maybe just translated a couple of times.

>>24072
With bestiality porn I always wonder which way round they have it. Is it a horse fucking a woman? Or is it a man fucking a labrador? Which is more immoral - penetrating an animal, or being penetrated by an animal?

>>24076
It provides a link to the "original article" at the bottom, which makes me think the website (which I've certainly never heard of before) has a bot which just copy-pastes articles from other news sites. That would explain why it refers to a picture that isn't there, for example.

>>24077
It would be curious to see how far they'd take it. Are any lubes based on animal products? Is it immoral to be penetrated by a frankfurter? To eat or suck on unprocessed animal genitals while masturbating? There's always the lazy "if it's clear you're getting off on it sexually then that's what makes it porn" angle but it's not unheard of for people to describe food as being so good eating it turns them on. The imagery of this makes me feel slightly ill but it seems as though that's where the legislation's coming from, there's no actual harm prevention there.

>>24076

The story is copied from another website, but with a crude algorithm to replace random words with synonyms. Google's algorithm can easily spot straight plagiarism, but it struggles to detect gibberish.

It's the same reason for those long preambles on recipe websites - recipes don't look like original content to the algorithm because they're quite formulaic, so you need to tack on some bollocks about how it was your nan's favourite.

>>24077
I'd say it's far more immoral to penetrate and animal than it is to be penetrated by one.

If the animal is doing the penetrating then there's a reasonable chance they're getting some enjoyment out of it. The other way round reminds me of that story of a woman who pieced together that her son was raping her dogs because of miserable her pets became.

>>24081
Where on the moral spectrum is foreplay?

I sometimes get a boner when the cat kneeds my thigh with its claws.

>>24081
I think it's dirtier to be fucked by an animal than to fuck one. Imagine a dog cumming in your bum, it's unthinkable. I can probably rationalise fucking an animal, but not enticing one to fuck your bum/fanny.

>>24081

The way we treat animals generally in terms of factory farming most (far worse than any concentration camp and done at a mind-boggling scale), wantonly destroying the habitats of others and enslaving the rest for emotional support/punchbags, worrying about their genitals is just bizarre.

What in the name of God is happening here?

>>24073

I have no idea about zoophiles but paedos start up animé leagues

>>24085
Stop trying to rationalise wanking your dog off. It isn't happening.

>>24085
>>24088

>>24086
The ignorance that the young generation have towards fire safety.

One day when I have a house I'll get a dog.

When you get a boy dog, the right thing to do is get their balls cut off, isn't it? I've always vaguely felt a bit bad about that, it's not like the poor lad asked to be a human pet, and that's the price he has to pay. I've always sympathised a bit more with animals that your average person would so it sort of troubles me a bit emotionally.

But then again, if you don't give him the snip, he's going to be very sexually frustrated. He'll be a literally involuntary celibate. Anyone who's ever gone on a residential trip as a teenager know how much of a nightmare it is not to wank for a week or two, the poor guy will be losing his mind, and it's not like he can wank himself off. They can reach down there with their mouths, which is something a human can't do, but I don't think they've invented blowjobs in dog society yet.

Is having an un-neutered dog perhaps one of the signs of a zoophile?

(I've never felt the same ethical quandary over female dogs and spaying them, so I think the solution for me is just to get a girl dog. I still wouldn't fuck it though.)

>>24091

I've been trying to restrain myself, but you've forced my hand.

>>24091

Neutering dogs is largely done for human convenience. Anyone telling you otherwise is misdirecting you in an effort to be responsible about unwanted pup litters, at the expense of the health of the dog.

Neutering has some positive and negative health effects associated with it, but I believe the negative outweigh the positive and I personally wouldn't do it if I had a dog. That comes with the responsibility of supervising the dog, not letting him rut or spend time around females in heat. I'd want to avoid all of the potential problems down the road, especially the joint and bone issues that would seriously inhibit a dogs quality of life.

>>24093

>That comes with the responsibility of supervising the dog, not letting him rut or spend time around females in heat

Which is one reason why it's strongly recommended to neuter free-range cats. You can supervise a dog if you are a committed dog owner, but you don't know what your cat does when he or she is out and about.

A friend had an unneutered male Rottweil, which one time actually spunked on the sofa pillows after dry humping them for several minutes. Good times.

Sounds like you lads want to leave bollocks on your dogs as an excuse to watch them shagging other dogs.

>>24093

The references at the bottom of this article might be of interest. Generally it's bad for the muskuloskeletal system, but take it on balance with the risk that you might end up with a litter of pups you don't know what to do with: https://www.akcchf.org/educational-resources/library/articles/an-update-on-the-health.html

>>24092
Saying rude things in a Cockney accent is not inherently funny and it never has been. Stop posting these fucking videos I swear to God.

>>23402
Natalie Wild is in the third episode of This Is Going to Hurt, which is the first time she's been on the telly in about ten years.

Still would.

>>24351
>Natalie Wild
I wanted to know if I knew her from anything, but DuckDuckGo image results just return tonnes of, mostly, Natalie Mars porn (who is someone else I don't know) and with safe searching on I got a million different women actors, muscians, etc.

I have to ask, are you Natalie Wil? Because no one else seems to remember this person.

>>24353
IMDB has the entire cast, including nobodies, and there isn't a Natalie Wild listed. There's a Yasmin Wilde, but I don't think she's in that picture and she is allegedly only in the first two episodes anyway.

>>24351
It is my conclusion that she does not exist, and is a product of your imagination like Tyler Durden. Just to confirm, I see three people in that picture you posted; if Natalie Wild is the fourth one then I recommend you seek medical attention.

>>24354
Natalie Wild is the name of the character that actress played in some '90's children's show, The Wild House or something like that.

>>24353

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0064749/

>>24355
I think I watched The Wild House. And it was made in 1997 and appears to be aimed at the 8-12 demographic, so I almost certainly knew about it, whether I watched it or not. What a fantastic memory you have.

>>24357
I don't remember shit I'm just slightly better at looking things up.

>>24357
It's almost as if the clues were there all along, >>23402, ladm8.

>>24095
>Sounds like you lads want to leave bollocks on your dogs as an excuse to watch them shagging other dogs.

I KNEW IT

When I was a child I was a big Formula One fan, with Mika Hakkinen my favourite driver. I used to day dream that I had Bernard's Watch and I'd use it to take one of the wheels off Michael Schumacher's cars so he'd have to retire from the race because he was such a dirty cheating German twat.