[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
world

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 23899)
Message
File  []
close
horws.jpg
238992389923899
>> No. 23899 Britfag
1st October 2016
Saturday 7:03 pm
23899 Happiness
I've been wondering, .gs, where in the world are people really happy?

Switzerland, Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Canada typically rank up there in terms of polling. There is indeed such a thing as a World Happiness Report, which released the following ahead of a United Nations holiday celebrating... well, happiness.

http://worldhappiness.report/

It's actually really interesting reading if you have the time for it, but it does beg some deeper questions. Is there a reliable way to test for happiness? If the study is to be believed, then what qualities do the highest ranked countries share? What makes people happy?

My own observations lead me to think about things like public health, material security, quality of social relationships, and maybe most importantly, freedom and creative control over work. Amartya Sen put it pretty elegantly when he said the central concern of human development is ‘our capability to lead the kind of lives we have reason to value’.

How happy do you think people are in your area of the United Kingdom? How happy are you as an individual?
Expand all images.
>> No. 23900 Britfag
1st October 2016
Saturday 8:11 pm
23900 spacer
It is my ambition to find a girl who prefers anal to vaginal intercourse. Not because I'm particularly fond of anal sex, but the idea of it is remarkably kinky and arousing.

Until I find that woman I fear I will never be truly happy.
>> No. 23901 Britfag
1st October 2016
Saturday 8:16 pm
23901 spacer
>>23900

Consider dating somewhere along the many wonderful shades of the queer spectrum.
>> No. 23902 Monkey
1st October 2016
Saturday 8:22 pm
23902 spacer
>>23900

Google "anal only lifestyle".
>> No. 23903 Britfag
1st October 2016
Saturday 8:26 pm
23903 spacer
>>23901

He doesn't want to bumder a man.
>> No. 23904 Britfag
1st October 2016
Saturday 8:33 pm
23904 spacer
>>23902
>>23901

Sadly, it is rather frowned upon to use sites like Fetlife for hook-ups, and I have no intention of participating in that community.

I may have some depraved fetishes, but I'm otherwise a mentally sound individual, something which simply cannot be said for the majority of LGBT/fetish oriented lifestyle types.
>> No. 23906 Britfag
1st October 2016
Saturday 8:48 pm
23906 spacer
>>23905

Have you ever considered that you might just be a miserable sod?
>> No. 23907 Wastelander
1st October 2016
Saturday 8:55 pm
23907 spacer
The only thing that will make me happy, happy forever, is not existing.
>> No. 23908 Cockernay
1st October 2016
Saturday 8:57 pm
23908 spacer
>It's actually really interesting reading if you have the time for it

No its not and I will explain why by looking at the methodology:
>The rankings are based on answers to the main life evaluation question asked in the poll. This is called the Cantril ladder: it asks respondents to think of a ladder, with the best possible life for them being a 10, and the worst possible life being a 0. They are then asked to rate their own current lives on that 0 to 10 scale.
http://worldhappiness.report/faq/

Absolute pop-sci bollocks that people have managed to swindle trips around the world, countless interviews and probably a book out of. I'd hate to be a cunt but if I say 5 and its followed by murmurs and angry scribbling its not my country that is wrong. Similarly cultural biases flourish at least from the Swedes who approach such a question (and life) from the concept of Lagom which is fundamentally different to how we approach and see life.

What even is happiness and why would I want it? This is what made me bin Aristotle.

>>23906
Why is it that every time I go to correct a minor typo some smart arse has replied to me?

Anyway I might be a miserable sod but I like being a miserable sod. Lets see your theory of happiness handle that one.
>> No. 23909 Britfag
1st October 2016
Saturday 9:28 pm
23909 spacer
>>23908
>I'd hate to be a cunt but if I say 5 and its followed by murmurs and angry scribbling its not my country that is wrong.

I don't follow what you mean here. Are you saying that some of the people answering would have been mentally unstable or coerced?

What would a better methodology be for answering a question like this? If you really do think it's 'pop-sci bollocks' then I'm happy to move the conversation into more rational territory. So to criticise the study, I agree that cultural bias would play a part, and the subjective element involved in the perception of happiness would make it difficult to measure.

That being said, I do genuinely believe that people share certain universal needs, like the ones I listed:
>public health, material security, quality of social relationships, and maybe most importantly, freedom and creative control over work.

I don't want to go too far into abstract definitions of happiness. I'm more interested in what creates a better environment for people to flourish.
>> No. 23910 Aki
2nd October 2016
Sunday 12:52 am
23910 spacer
>>23904

If you want a woman who only wants it up the harris and is mentally sound, you'll be looking for a long time.
>> No. 23911 Gazza
2nd October 2016
Sunday 1:06 am
23911 spacer
>>23908

Cantril developed his ladder in 1965; it has been widely studied and used for over 50 years. Researching something as broad and hard to define as happiness is inherently difficult, but that doesn't mean that this research is meaningless.

Most research now distinguishes between happiness, which tends to fluctuate over quite a short time-frame, and life satisfaction, which tends to be relatively stable.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password