>>1781

>You can't have rational discussion with truthers because they arrive at the debate pre-retarded.

This is particularly true. They've decided to believe in something, rather than gone through any logical steps to reach a conclusion. And they spend far too long on terrible websites, desperately seeking some sort of validation of their awful opinions.

But it doesn't matter, because nobody takes them seriously.

>>1782
I did hear one of truther who had the audacity to first argue his point, then suggest that anyone who disagreed with him wasn't qualified to discuss the matter. You really couldn't make this sort of shit up.

I did have one guy tell me that I'd been brainwashed by the mainstream media and shouldn't believe anything I read in the papers. I pointed out to him that as a Britisher I'm already well-used to not believing anything I read in the papers.

>>1783

And obviously, rather than believing anything in the papers, you definitely should trust blogs, websites, and forums with animated .gifs of spinning skulls.

>>1784

The best thing to come out of 'nine eleven' is the phrase 'INSAHD JARB!'.

The CIA did 9/11, and make no mistake about it. Poor Allende didn't know what hit him. 9/11/73 NEVAR FORGET