>>4469
Hmmm. Stroke though, gets people early. My Dad had one a few years back. Survived, but isn't the same.

>>4470

>Survived, but isn't the same.

Better or worse?

>>4471
His voice went from being very articulate to a bit doddery and sometimes sounding drunk (despite not going near the stuff). A very strange process to observe.

>>2872

Aaauuugghhh, me and my speedy read-y ways. "Biggest loss of American life", quite clearly not necessarily meaning it took place on US soil.

I am a mallard.

>>2874
You silly bollard.

>>4460

Are these auditing questions from the Church of Nonsenseology?

>>4461
Yes, and they half made me laugh and half gave me the fear.

>>4450

For many are called, yet few are chosen, eh?

>>4451
Are you making fun of people with Down's syndrome?

>>4452

He probably is unaware of down brother who likes his ale.

>>4450
I too have a highers in English.

>>4454

Yeah, well I've got GCEs in Maths and Art.

My personal /BOO/ theories of late are that the Russians rigged the US election and Brexit, for optimal destruction of their enemies. And will therefore rig this election too. I therefore expect a Labour-SNP coalition as that is the best strategy to tear the country apart.

It's difficult to understand why a eskimo would be willing to give their life to do something which could only possibly make life worse for eskimos and strengthen and further militarise a government which will only be more likely to attack eskimo countries.

>>4439

Ahahaha, you poor, poor man-sheep. Obviously the bomber believed in the need to kill kaffir. However, the MI6 operatives that posed as ISIS vets and used Mr Abedi as a proxy knew the REAL aim behind the attack. I hope all that fluoride was worth the lovely teeth, you handsome fool.

I don't believe that really, but that's what I would assume if I thought this was a set up.

>>4439
That's kind of the main aim of ISIS. To draw lines, divide society and let the war they want begin.

Keep in mind the woman who would organize such a vast conspiracy is Amber Rudd, pictured here in her now trademark safety glasses.

>>4439
I would hazard to guess that the people who launch suicide attacks on children are probably not all that inclined towards thinking about the long-term consequences. To me ISIS terrorists seem to have more in common with school shooters only it is society at large that has made them feel so impotent that they have to lash out with obscene brutality.

>>4431
Welcome to /boo/.

The cynic in me dismiss it all without a second thought. But my misses bought a book on tarot based on the art, and it fascinates me how many little bits of symbolism and quirks there are when i started reading what the cards 'meant'. You hit the nail on the head about it being vague and vapid, that is by design, like all of those 'not meant to be taken literally' passages in the bible. The whole thing is cold reading really, it paints in broad brush strokes and you assign what you want to it all. As far as I'm aware it was never originally meant to have mystical powers but that was added later to add spice to it. Much like wigia boards were original a paker bros board game and all of the negative association is purely a result of 'the exorcist'. Funny how these things start off more mundane but society makes them supernatural.

>>4430

I laughed. I clicked the link. I got a reading that arguably contradicted itself.

Shrugged my shoulders, started taking some crockery downstairs. I fell over and smashed a cup.

What have I done?

>>4434

You're not cursed, you're just a clumsy fucker.

>>4430
Rachael or Lynn?

>>4417
Or maybe, just maybe, a significant proportion of people who take DMT have done their research and heard the stories of the "machine elves", planting the idea deep in their subconscious to be unearthed by a large dose of a mind-altering drug. Occam's razor and all that.

>>4420

I saw this chap. When I was trying to describe it later to some friends, one of them told me about Alex Gray''s artwork. I looked him up and found this picture. The background was different, and it had a body, but that's what I saw, same colours as well. The only way I could describe the colours would be if you look directly at a light, and then look away - you get that imprint on your eye, which you can see clearer when you close your eyes. It's a colour that doesn't really exist in reality. The colours were like that, but with the contrast turned up, that's the closest way I can think of describing it. It was like nothing else I have ever seen.

>>4421

I call it the colour of darkness. I found that AMT was especially good at bringing it out, because we always sat in darkness to ease the transition into the dream realm. I would start seeing shades of that uniquely hallucinogenic pink/purple/green tone spreading from the edges of objects and the usually pitch black night sky was always burning bright with that colour.

There's a game about the occult called 'The Black Watchmen'. You might like it.

>>4423
Hah. Are you a player?

>>4403
Some would say there is no such thing as coincidence and some would talk of synchronicity fields, and some might allude to sensory gating and how a healthy mind apparently ignores a great deal of what it is capable of perceiving there as it is simply too much strangeness to remain sane and process.

There is an Aleister Crowley 'interpretation' of a nursery rhyme posted above which manages to be simulataneously ridiculous ans serious. There is a book by Robert Anton Wilson 'The Cosmic Trigger' which addresses this whole area of high strangeness via personal anecdotes and memoirs.

I don't really know what to make of it all myself and think these kek/pepe theory websites are best taken as entertainment. They are certainly a bit more amusing than the paranoiac likes of the aangirfan blog or David Icke.

>>4404
>paranoiac likes of the aangirfan blog
That's a funny way to spell "truth telling".

>>4405
It's madness that blog. They draw together unassociated things in the hope that the reader will 'piece it together' in some sort of doomy and defeatist way. They use very dubious source material. They have a heavy and ugly anti-semitic streak. I wouldn't deny that it can be interesting to browse sometimes, but ultimately it feels disempowering, and a paranoid trap like the worst conspiracy theory. It's as predictable as the Daily Mail after you get used to the style too. Lazy journalism. If you really do regard it as truth-telling then I would be interested in hearing your counter-argument in favour of it.

Do you feel in charge?

>>4407

This can't be happening!

>>4386
I think we can forgive you that even if your wife doesn't.

>>4386

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0iA_rOcn9Y

So the Mrs forgave me for polishing off her precious whisky. I was too hungover to do what >>4387 suggested. On the upside, I didn't pass out and piss myself. I cooked an awesome roast chicken diner and provided extended marital foreplay so all woz forgiven.

Despite giving up the ciggies a few weeks ago (again), I've just bought a 10 pack to help sooth the ingestion of 2 bottles of co-op 14% vino. And I've just had a vision:

>Compromised Trump woz brought in to split the republican vote and secure Hillary a free run.
>Hillary fucked up by indiscreetly taking money from everyone, no questions asked (unless it woz politically prudent not to - i.e best Korea etc).
>Somehow she pissed off atheist Hebrews (No offence Hebrewlad).
>Trump the salesman has somehow winged his way to almost first place despite being a bankrupt pervert with the worst combover EVER.
>We now have HyperNormalisation.
>IT WOZ Adam Curtis, the BBC and MI5 the whole fucking time. Something Something.
>Putin's handlers may or may not have had a hand in this.
>Obama will secure a 3rd term.
>Robots will replace 50% of the workforce.
>Never trust Ching-Chongs.
>World war 3 etc.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

Bad goy!

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/12172

>>4391

Oh my Lord! She was scheming to make the USA an Israeli ally all along!

Yeah, alright, try harder, dipstick. That's like the least egregious thing to be leaked. In fact give me your address so I can show you the bad shit in person, then stomp on your head until I'm using your brains for boot polish, you fucking, Jew hating, subnormal, fuck.

>>4376
Have you considered that I might have actually planted this story to make you question him questioning you but really it's just me?

>>4371
We have senior Hillary campaign staff on video record admitting how they organise mass voter fraud.

>>4377
No, because that would require there to be at least four of us.

>>4378
Source? Unless you're referring to the vote-swapping thing, which the courts have upheld as entirely legal.

>>4380
He's talking about some James O'Keefe tape. O'Keefe is notorious for taking things wildly out of context (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACORN_2009_undercover_videos_controversy for an example), so take it with a pinch of salt.

>>4359
Someone sending an astronaut stuff about aliens.

>>4359
An astronaut and a punk rocker emailing a high ranking Democrat politician (Hilary's main campaign manager) about aliens, and the powerful politician seems to agree with them that the existence of ETIs should be disclosed to the public. Weird revelations that the Vatican know about them already and are also keeping quiet. Grade A /boo/ stuff.

>>4361
Not just that, but mention of zero point energy as well. I remember Gary McKinnon saying he'd seen stuff about that.

>>4362

Well, yes. He would have. It being a serious research subject for space drives by NASA. Are you actually a moron?

Who's not seen a UFO these days. Not just an orange blob in the sky. I've seen quite a few. One was a flat Y shaped object with a friend. Saw a couple of A10's flying so low I could see the pilots in their cockpits chasing some weird looking thing over Bradford and a triangle over Manchester that flew around like a dragonfly.

It's not that far fetched, apart from the masons bit. I once got a friendly warning about asking certain comments in relation to local government corruption in relation to road building.

>>4341
How does that contradict what was said in any way?

it only spread from there 3000 years ago =/= it didn't exist even there until 3000 years ago

>>4343
Again, 3000 years is nothing, changes in a race or ethnicity can be measured in mere centuries. But let's study anatomy for a second, try not to blush if you can, ladies.

Testicles size is correlated with promiscuity in humans and our hairy cousins.

>The relative sizes of male testes often reflect mating systems.[13][14][15][16] In species with promiscuous mating systems, where many males mate with many females, the testes tend to be relatively large. This appears to be the result of sperm competition. Males with large testes produce more sperm and thereby gain an advantage impregnating females. In polygynous species, where one male controls sexual access to females, the testes tend to be small. One male defends exclusive sexual access to a group of females and thereby eliminates sperm competition.

>Studies of primates, including humans, support the relationship between testis size and mating system.[15][16][17] Chimpanzees, which have a promiscuous mating system, have large testes compared to other primates. Gorillas, which have a polygynous mating system, have smaller testes than other primates. Humans, which have a socially monogamous mating system, accompanied by moderate amounts of sexual non-monogamy (see incidence of monogamy), have moderately sized testes

Yes, I'm aware this is focused at polygyny, (harem structures) as well as monogamy, but the fact is in both of these scenarios males are not directly competing sexually, thus the need for large balls to inseminate rival females doesn't exist.

Now, to the asians -

>Race differences in testicle size have also been measured (Asians = 9 grams, Europeans = 21 g). This is not just because Europeans have a slightly larger body size. The difference is too large. A 1989 article in Nature, the leading British science magazine, said that the difference in testicle size could mean that Whites make two times as many sperm per day as do Orientals. So far, we have no information on the relative size of Blacks. (Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective. 2nd Special Abridged Edition. Written by Professor J. Philippe Rushton University of Western Ontario.)

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>4344
>Yes, I'm aware this is focused at polygyny, (harem structures)

So nothing to do with monogamy then? Ok.

>>4345
Read on.

>>4341
I don't think 3000 years is long enough for this thread to evolve into anything worthwhile, unfortunately.

>>4331
Giving a false name to the police is illegal.

>>4330
"I can't imagine" is not a valid argument. This article is clearly emotionally motivated, the reasoning the court had would be worth looking at were it out there, as would the prospensity of this happening in other cases.

>>4330
> I can't imagine a serious scenario in which the family is even vaguely culpable for their son's actions

Not saying this is necessarily the case, but in a lot of rich families the children don't always have the best upbringing, with expensive toys and boarding schools replacing actual affection from parents too busy with their high-flying careers. I don't think it's a massive leap to suggest lack of parental affection can lead a child to have skewed views of love and relationships when they grow up.

Again, not saying this is necessarily the case - but it's entirely within the realm of possibility that they would be at least 'vaguely culpable' as you put it.

>>4332
>Giving a false name to the police is illegal.
No, it's not. Unless of course this chap was stopped in relation to anti-social behaviour, evading a train fare, or a traffic offence, then he could have perfectly legally given any name he liked, or none at all.

>>4326 The DM covered it and hasn't taken it down:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3291869/Eton-College-student-caught-2-000-indecent-images-children-computer-encouraged-youngsters-strip-webcam.html

In fact, google was full of links.

Captain Picard is never a good sign.

And a contribution for deathbed confessions.

>>4320
I had a bit of a failure of English there apparently.

No, I've not attempted to do anything significantly more complicated than was in the original paper. Though the decay doesn't necessarily need to be conspirators being killed off, just of them being removed from positions where they have access to the level of information needed for a credible whistle-blowing.

This has nothing to do with maths though. Being "exposed" has nothing to do with actually uncovering a conspiracy There are literally hundreds of people who claim to have been involved in conspiracies of all stripes. Depending on how much of a nutter they are or how believable the story, it's incredibly easy to discredit these would be whistle-blowers, and then that's the end of it.

Someone comes out and tells us everything about how the government assassinated so and so and with a little encouragement everyone rolls their eyes in synchronisation, "What a nutter, just trying to sell a few books isn't he..." meanwhile they actually did do it but nobody believes it regardless and this little piece of maths doesn't make a difference.

>>4323
>This has nothing to do with maths though.

Why are you pigeonholing 'maths' as a single thing? Everything has everything to do with mathematics, it's just a matter of having enough data and looking hard enough for a pattern.

To your second point, I think this is why we should differentiate between credible whistle-blowers such as Snowden who publish direct evidence, and any random person who can and will confess to anything for any number of reasons.

>>4322
An English of failure, surely?