[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
Subject   (new thread)
File  []
>> No. 82247 Anonymous
4th May 2017
Thursday 1:18 am
82247 German Federal Election 2017
This man is going to be the next German Chancellor and it's going to be fucking awesome.
Expand all images.
>> No. 82248 Anonymous
4th May 2017
Thursday 1:43 am
82248 spacer
>it's going to be fucking awesome.

Kill yourself. He's a dumb, racist, joke, as are you by association.
>> No. 82249 Anonymous
4th May 2017
Thursday 12:43 pm
82249 spacer
>He's a dumb, racist, joke

I.e. German.
>> No. 82257 Anonymous
4th May 2017
Thursday 7:33 pm
82257 spacer
>> No. 82258 Anonymous
4th May 2017
Thursday 7:38 pm
82258 spacer


I forgot I'd posted that; you owe me royalties.

Telling people to kill themselves really isn't on.
>> No. 82264 Anonymous
4th May 2017
Thursday 8:29 pm
82264 spacer
That poor lizard is about die because of his hiccups.

>> No. 81994 Anonymous
5th April 2017
Wednesday 9:33 am
81994 spacer
Did Livingstone say anything wrong?
17 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 82026 Anonymous
7th April 2017
Friday 10:57 pm
82026 spacer
Because, if he doesn't think being labelled as a Jewish commentator "sounds great", then only writing about Jewish issues won't help.

Sage for explaining simple logic to a simpleton
>> No. 82100 Anonymous
17th April 2017
Monday 10:40 am
82100 spacer
You have to let go of the hate.
>> No. 82109 Anonymous
18th April 2017
Tuesday 2:34 pm
82109 spacer
The truth is rassssssssssisssssssssssssssssssss now. It doesn't matter if he states simple facts. All must submit to the demands of the Party and their narrative of ever shifting reality and history, written to suit their current plans. Reality is ignored. Study of reality instead of the model they construct to replace it is forbidden. Facts must be buried. Dangerous commies are good at burying stuff, often millions of the dead they murdered, but also facts.
>> No. 82110 Anonymous
18th April 2017
Tuesday 2:41 pm
82110 spacer
>It doesn't matter if he states simple facts
Which incident are you referring to? Clearly not the Hitler thing since those were only facts in the alternative sense.
>> No. 82231 Anonymous
27th April 2017
Thursday 9:30 pm
82231 spacer
>Ann Frankly
Good one, anon.

Make Britain great again Donald Trump%27s wife .jpg
>> No. 82141 Anonymous
20th April 2017
Thursday 2:06 pm
82141 spacer

I'm considering joining the Conservative party.
3 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 82146 Anonymous
20th April 2017
Thursday 5:33 pm
82146 spacer
>> No. 82147 Anonymous
20th April 2017
Thursday 6:15 pm
82147 spacer
>> No. 82150 Anonymous
20th April 2017
Thursday 6:33 pm
82150 spacer

I have a shirt in exactly that tartan.
>> No. 82151 Anonymous
20th April 2017
Thursday 6:50 pm
82151 spacer
To match the wife, eh Phil?
>> No. 82179 Anonymous
21st April 2017
Friday 9:41 pm
82179 spacer

If you ask really nicely it's one of these

>> No. 82000 Anonymous
5th April 2017
Wednesday 8:57 pm
82000 spacer
How does it feel now,
The Union will defend us to the last person and the best you can hope for is a Norway model, with the free movement but no representation at the Union HQ.
Expect us and learn how to love people, closet xenophobes (at least half of the country)
It's sad that I am leaving soon to CN, I love such a drama you've brought on yourself. Thank you so much (seriously)
I know it's embarrassing, but really, you are not that important anymore in the world.
5 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 82010 Anonymous
6th April 2017
Thursday 11:01 am
82010 spacer
I will but you will stay and get a whipping by the Union Daddy for being a xenophobe.
Fortunately it's only half of the country.
>> No. 82011 Anonymous
6th April 2017
Thursday 11:15 am
82011 spacer
Who the fuck are you supposed to be?
>> No. 82014 Anonymous
6th April 2017
Thursday 6:00 pm
82014 spacer
Just a foreign lad
>> No. 82062 Anonymous
13th April 2017
Thursday 9:53 am
82062 spacer

good fuck off
>> No. 82066 Anonymous
13th April 2017
Thursday 6:03 pm
82066 spacer

5th April 2017
Wednesday 11:40 pm 82008 spacer

>I know it's embarrassing, but really, you are not that important anymore in the world.

Lad, you're embarrassing.

>> No. 81926 Anonymous
17th March 2017
Friday 8:02 pm
81926 the donald
has finally made me think of defending GCHQ. Of course we're the ones who have wiretapped all his phones and the spies and bad people his people are speaking to. The US outsourced all that to us ages ago.

I can't believe he's made me feel proud of the whole idea.

23 posts and 2 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 82043 Anonymous
8th April 2017
Saturday 11:40 pm
82043 spacer
We'll counter your point when you bother making one.
>> No. 82044 Anonymous
8th April 2017
Saturday 11:49 pm

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 82045 Anonymous
8th April 2017
Saturday 11:57 pm
82045 spacer



(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 82046 Anonymous
9th April 2017
Sunday 1:12 am
82046 spacer


Ahhh 1 2 3 4

I knew a leftist that wasn't a nob
Wasn't a nob
Got up before 8 am and got a job
A job (Beatles woo hoo)
>> No. 82047 Anonymous
9th April 2017
Sunday 1:17 am
82047 spacer
Well done lads, you've both made no point and look like twats. Good show.

>> No. 69249 Anonymous
17th February 2016
Wednesday 12:49 pm
69249 100% Inheritance Tax
Some time ago I came up with the idea of abolishing or massively reducing most of the taxes collected by the government with the exception of one tax, inheritance tax, which I advocated being raised to 100% with no exemptions or minimum threshold. I posted the idea online (it might have been here) and was ridiculed.

Now I am back, having investigated the matter thoroughly and done a lot of number-crunching and I am here to make the case again. Although the primary motivation for my argument is a moral one, the numbers themselves actually do make sense and we would see a net gain to the tax revenue collected each year.

The plan is simple: Close all loopholes regarding inheritance tax, then raise it to 100% but allow people who jointly own a property to have first-refusal on purchasing it back from the government in the event of the other owner's death (providing they have the money or can get a mortgage). This would apply to any and all possessions including personal chattels meaning you will have to pay the government a few grand to keep your telly, furniture and the like if your wife dies.

Why is this a good idea?

1. It completely and permanently removes every single living person from the tax system forever, freeing them up to do what they please with 100% of the money they earn. Whether you think this is a good thing because you believe people should own the fruits of their own labour or you think it's a good thing because it incentivises people to earn money there is not really anywhere you can sit on the political spectrum and disagree with this.

2. It encourages wealthy individuals from all across the world to base themselves in Britain, creating employment opportunities and of course giving our treasury a shit ton of money when they die. Everybody dies and it's not the sort of thing you can really keep quiet so there's not really any way for people to evade it. If every billionaire on Earth moves significant assets here due to the fact that they don't have to pay any tax we will be drowning in money forever.

3. Morally there is no way to justify someone owning what they did not earn. As with point 1, wherever one sits on the political spectrum they at least pretend to agree with this. Even the die-hard supercapitalists who want to create a libertarian free-market utopia claim that their ideology is based upon wanting people to make their own way in the world and not "rely on others for hand-outs".

Just imagine the paradise we would live in. No income tax, no VAT, no looking over your shoulder to see if the taxman is watching you, but all without having to make even a single cut to any public service. Absolute heaven and it's achievable right now, today, here in Britain in 2016. Why isn't anyone making this happen?
129 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 75041 Anonymous
2nd July 2016
Saturday 5:34 am
75041 spacer

So you want to take money YOU didn't earn then decide who the beneficiaries will be? ...kind of a step up from the tenuous immorality of inheritance.
100% tax!
So thats home and all things of value?
...Leading slowly to Complete control by the government. Sure would like to be the nepotist in office handling where that money goes. Maybe Ken can slush some of it off to buy votes (again)
>> No. 75043 Anonymous
2nd July 2016
Saturday 5:50 am
75043 spacer
>So you want to take money YOU didn't earn then decide who the beneficiaries will be?

This is literally what all tax is.
>> No. 75046 Anonymous
2nd July 2016
Saturday 11:06 am
75046 spacer
On the upside, it's the only tax you'd ever have to pay, given we could afford to abolish pretty much everything else, and you wouldn't have to worry about passing on the house because the high turnover means that property would be much more affordable.
>> No. 81963 Anonymous
20th March 2017
Monday 3:33 am
81963 spacer
>abandon the country

To go where, pray tell?
>> No. 81964 Anonymous
20th March 2017
Monday 3:52 am
81964 spacer
This is the root reason first world countries need to bring back capital controls across the board.
Having a wealthy class capable of (a) strongly influencing how the world economy is run and (b) not tied to any particular country, capable of eloping with relative ease if things go all 1917 is a recipe for disaster.

>> No. 81888 Anonymous
5th March 2017
Sunday 2:27 am
81888 Nationalism Rising
Ireland said no to the foreigners
Expand all images.
>> No. 81889 Anonymous
5th March 2017
Sunday 2:37 am
81889 spacer
Not all foreigners. Just them across the water.
>> No. 81891 Anonymous
5th March 2017
Sunday 3:07 am
81891 spacer

Bastards broke ARE BEEB's ticker.
>> No. 81892 Anonymous
5th March 2017
Sunday 4:05 am
81892 spacer


>> No. 81938 Anonymous
18th March 2017
Saturday 5:13 pm
81938 spacer
Facin Brits.

History to Soon Repeat.jpg
>> No. 81441 Anonymous
17th January 2017
Tuesday 2:22 pm
81441 We're Going to Get Brexit Harder Than We Ever Imagined
>Brexit: UK to leave single market, says Theresa May

>Theresa May has said the UK "cannot possibly" remain within the European single market, as staying in it would mean "not leaving the EU at all". But the prime minister promised to push for the "greatest possible" access to the single market following Brexit.

>She said: "This agreement should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services between Britain and the EU's member states."It should give British companies the maximum possible freedom to trade with and operate within European markets and let European businesses do the same in Britain. But I want to be clear: what I am proposing cannot mean membership of the single market. It would, to all intents and purposes mean not leaving the EU at all. That is why both sides in the referendum campaign made it clear that a vote to leave the EU would be a vote to leave the single market."

>She told the remaining 27 EU member states: "We will continue to be reliable partners, willing allies and close friends. We want to buy your goods, sell you ours, trade with you as freely as possible, and work with one another to make sure we are all safer, more secure and more prosperous through continued friendship." Mrs May, who backed Remain in the referendum, called for a "new and equal partnership" with the EU, "not partial membership of the European Union, associate membership of the European Union, or anything that leaves us half-in, half-out. We do not seek to adopt a model already enjoyed by other countries. We do not seek to hold on to bits of membership as we leave."

>After Mrs May's speech Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron said: "Hard Brexit was never on the ballot paper. Ripping us out of the single market was not something proposed to the British people. This is a theft of democracy."


Correct me if I'm wrong lads but I seem to remember some sort of Norway/Switzerland relationship was being pushed very hard by the Brexit campaign? Could this be the beginning of the end for Theresa if her government collapses on the leave vote?
79 posts and 5 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 81827 Anonymous
23rd February 2017
Thursday 2:21 pm
81827 spacer
To a racist, obviously. But then you have to realise that minorities aren't the ones who should be lined up against the wall and executed... It's the racists that should face that. Then we can all have a great and happy world.

Kill yourself.
>> No. 81830 Anonymous
23rd February 2017
Thursday 8:08 pm
81830 spacer
The vast majority under the axe would be the minorities themselves m8.
>> No. 81831 Anonymous
23rd February 2017
Thursday 8:37 pm
81831 spacer
If they are racists, then sure.
>> No. 81870 Anonymous
27th February 2017
Monday 6:25 pm
81870 spacer
Heli carriers are more useful than you'd think, what with Crowsnest and anti - sub capability. The real problem is that building carriers takes ages and the cost cutting SDSR that scrapped Ark Royal happened before IS existed and Russia was stirring up shit, not to mention the pressure of recession. Which has left us with a capability gap but thems the breaks and the new QE class tubs look pretty amazing, Wonder if the money could've been better spent getting Sodexo away from the slop jockeys mind.
>> No. 83297 Anonymous
23rd August 2017
Wednesday 1:17 pm
83297 spacer
>Like the time he lied about train seats.
Will you be apologising for acting as the useful idiot of Branson et al.?

The guy stubbornly refuses to disavow inconvenient views and statements from decades past as you are pointing out and in the same breath you call him a liar. How much sense does that make?

>> No. 78588 Anonymous
9th October 2016
Sunday 1:02 am
78588 ed balls
I think I love him.
30 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 80742 Anonymous
4th December 2016
Sunday 2:13 pm
80742 spacer
Holy shit thats brilliant.
>> No. 80764 Anonymous
5th December 2016
Monday 6:37 pm
80764 spacer

I'm so happy I'm British, it's shit, but it blows the alternatives out of the water.
>> No. 81491 Anonymous
19th January 2017
Thursday 6:03 pm
81491 spacer
>> No. 81739 Anonymous
13th February 2017
Monday 10:17 am
81739 spacer

Is this Michael Jackson's latest form?
>> No. 81740 Anonymous
13th February 2017
Monday 10:43 am
81740 spacer


Wow, what a great joke, please do another?!

>> No. 81384 Anonymous
8th January 2017
Sunday 1:13 am
81384 Political salamists and the cucked left
Fight then in A11ah's way...rouse the believers to ardor maybe A11ah will restrain the fighting of those who disbelieve...

Like a truck in your face

(A good day to you Sir!)
Expand all images.
>> No. 81385 Anonymous
8th January 2017
Sunday 1:24 am
81385 spacer
I think perhaps you should be making for bed, lad.

>> No. 80999 Anonymous
11th December 2016
Sunday 9:10 pm
80999 spacer
Is the alt-right really racist?

I have been along these political lines for 10+ years and I am British born Male (one side Black Jamaican the other side Black Zimbabweans who fled after losing Rhodesian Bush War).

Why does Wikipedia think I'm a self loathing race traitor representing white nationalism? Not one of the popular alt right speakers have ever supported nationalism, socialism, any form of government control.

I strongly feel the established political parties, divisive media organisations and tin hat time, the anti Christian secret societies are on some kind of crusade against people that want smaller government, manageable immigration and less corporate involvement in politics and are being scapegoated as some kind of Nazi party (which is exactly what we are against, big government socialism).

To illustrate what I'm talking about, Wikipedia says; The alt-right has no formal ideology, although various sources have stated that white nationalism is fundamental. It has also been associated with white supremacism. Islamophobia, antifeminism, homophobia, antisemitism, ethno-nationalism, right-wing populism, nativism, traditionalism, and the neoreactionary movement.

Is that just wikipedia fuckery?
99 posts and 9 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 81320 Anonymous
26th December 2016
Monday 1:25 pm
81320 spacer

Because now we know that was definitely the Carolingian Dynasty, they still at it today.
>> No. 81321 Anonymous
26th December 2016
Monday 5:29 pm
81321 spacer
Golly, you're boring. Why do you even bother? All your posts are essentially, "nuh-uh, you're mental".

Just why would you?
>> No. 81322 Anonymous
26th December 2016
Monday 11:16 pm
81322 spacer
Maybe if you weren't so mental it wouldn't need to be said.
>> No. 81323 Anonymous
27th December 2016
Tuesday 11:20 am
81323 spacer
I'm another lad (I haven't said anything yet that you've dismissed offhand as mental without reason) but I can see you're an irritating cunt.
>> No. 81324 Anonymous
27th December 2016
Tuesday 11:47 am
81324 spacer
>I'm another lad
As am I. Something something anonymous imageboard.

>> No. 81175 Anonymous
18th December 2016
Sunday 12:28 am
81175 REd Pill
“We live in a world where there is more and more information, and less and less meaning.”
― Jean Baudrillard




29 posts and 2 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 81302 Anonymous
24th December 2016
Saturday 2:04 am
81302 spacer

Only the ZX 48k m8

20 GOTO 10
30 RUN
>> No. 81305 Anonymous
24th December 2016
Saturday 4:03 am
81305 spacer
>الماعز الجنس رجل

The La Li Lu Le Lo!?
>> No. 81307 Anonymous
24th December 2016
Saturday 4:30 am
81307 spacer
I'm going to answer the only point that has any remote basis in reality. The white helmets are seen in the rebel areas because those are the areas getting the shit pounded out of them by Assad and the Russians. It may come as some surprise that he's not bombing the shit out of people who support him. In particular, they're going where nobody else is going. They're in those areas specifically because organisations like the actual national civil defence body (run by the government) and the Syrian Red Crescent are refusing to go in.
>> No. 81318 Anonymous
24th December 2016
Saturday 4:27 pm
81318 spacer
I think I would like him more if he was.
>> No. 81319 Anonymous
26th December 2016
Monday 1:17 pm
81319 spacer

Hi Eugene!

>> No. 80819 Anonymous
9th December 2016
Friday 1:37 pm
80819 spacer
Is pic related the only half decent female leader the world has seen?

Look at the rest - Merkel, Dilma, Park Geun Hye, Hillary Clinton - and she seems at least competent in retrospect, whether you like her or not.
86 posts and 14 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 80996 Anonymous
11th December 2016
Sunday 7:46 pm
80996 spacer

She's had a "thing" against Russia for quite some time. Some of her attacks verge on the xenophobic (My stomach can't handle I can't be bothered to trawl through her Twitter history, but I'm sure you could find them if you're interested).

Mensch is absolutely insufferable, and a nasty piece of work. If anything the US should consider our sending over of her, James Corden, Simon Cowell and Piers Morgan a first nuclear strike.
>> No. 81008 Anonymous
12th December 2016
Monday 1:14 am
81008 spacer
Sorry mate you're just a misogynist.

Who the fuck looks at Trump's Twitter feed and concludes 'we need to get the men out of politics'?
>> No. 81012 Anonymous
12th December 2016
Monday 2:13 am
81012 spacer

What's worse: that she knows she's chatting shit and just does it for attention, or she actually thinks WW3/the largest war in Europe since WW2 (at best) is a great idea?

Also Mensch isn't a politician anymore, just a pillock with a Twitter account, and she's far more a pillock than she is a woman.
>> No. 81021 Anonymous
12th December 2016
Monday 12:14 pm
81021 spacer

She's one of those cases where in public she hates Russia to unnecessary levels; but in private it turns out it's to cover for the fact she has a huge fetish for being taken in the bum by huge Eastern Europeans.
>> No. 81022 Anonymous
12th December 2016
Monday 12:15 pm
81022 spacer
She's just trying to get Vlad's attention.

>> No. 78397 Anonymous
5th October 2016
Wednesday 9:27 am
78397 spacer
Ukip leader Diane James has quit the role after just 18 days.

In a statement Ms James said: "It is with great regret that I announce that I will not be formalising my recent nomination to become the new leader of the party with the Electoral Commission.

Having won the enthusiastic support of party members, I was nominated by them as the new leader at the recent Ukip Bournemouth conference. Since that time I have been in discussion with party officers about the role. It has become clear that I do not have sufficient authority, nor the full support of all my MEP colleagues and party officers to implement changes I believe necessary and upon which I based my campaign.

For personal and professional reasons therefore, I will not take the election process further. I will continue to concentrate fully on my activities and responsibilities as a Member of the European Parliament."

Senior Ukip members reported that Ms James, who took over from Jimmy Saville last month, had resigned her position for personal and family reasons. One senior party member told The Telegraph that Ms James has felt uneasy about her new role ever since she was spat at on a train station platform after winning the leadership contest.

105 posts and 21 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 80788 Anonymous
6th December 2016
Tuesday 2:26 pm
80788 spacer
That's Neil Horan. A true mentalist if there ever was one.
>> No. 80993 Anonymous
11th December 2016
Sunday 7:32 pm
80993 spacer

Yep, that guy is a looney.
They carefully chose that picture to not show everything he had to say though. Here's a more illuminating one.

Haha, your side lost remoaner cunts.

I think this guy is an obvious plant to make some of that fake news we've been hearing about.
>> No. 80997 Anonymous
11th December 2016
Sunday 7:49 pm
80997 spacer

He's the sort of nut usually found only in Speakers Corner or yer mum's room.
>> No. 80998 Anonymous
11th December 2016
Sunday 8:58 pm
80998 spacer
Jimmy Saville has revealed how he is having a 'great time' since quitting as Ukip leader because he no longer has to deal with 'low-grade people' every day.

The 52-year-old said that leaving the role means he does not have to associate with people he would never choose to have a drink with or employ. He also added that he is relieved to not be responsible for what the party's 'branch secretary in Lower Slaughter said half-cut on Twitter last night'.

Mr Saville, in an interview with James Kirkup at the Daily Telegraph, said that people 'use him as a vehicle for their own self-promotion'.

'There are a lot of great people in Ukip. The problem is that Ukip has become a bit like the other parties: people view it as a means to get elected.'

The MEP also revealed he has ambitions to bring peace to the Middle East through his ties with US president-elect Donald Trump.

>> No. 81003 Anonymous
11th December 2016
Sunday 10:18 pm
81003 spacer
I think he doesn't care who he trolls; as long as he has attention.

Delete Post []
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]Next