[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
politics
Subject   (new thread)
Message
File  []
close
whiteline
bernie-sanders-11211.jpg
891438914389143
>> No. 89143 Anonymous
25th February 2020
Tuesday 2:04 am
89143 spacer
This man is going to be the next President of the United States, and it's going to be fucking awesome.
171 posts and 15 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 89738 Anonymous
21st May 2020
Thursday 7:52 am
89738 spacer
>>89737

Oh, for those halcyon days of being bored of Brexit instead of being bored of a global pandemic.

The transition agreement ends at the end of the year, the government say that they won't countenance an extension, but it's all fine. Everything is fine. Remain indoors.
>> No. 89739 Anonymous
21st May 2020
Thursday 9:48 am
89739 spacer
>>89736
I don't yearn for it, everything was bleak as fuck back then and there was looking like no end to the misery. At least the 'rona has shaken everything up. I'm bored of it myself by now, of course, but the future post pandemic is going to have some interesting times.

It's funny, it's a sentiment I've seen posted here before, and I've sometimes echoed myself. What we need is a good plague, clear out the cobwebs and shake up the order. Now we've got it, and it's been both worse than we'd ever have imagined and yet more disappointing.
>> No. 89740 Anonymous
21st May 2020
Thursday 10:09 am
89740 spacer
>>89736
Ah you bastard. Why did you have to remind me how close Bernie came to winning the nomination.
>> No. 89741 Anonymous
23rd May 2020
Saturday 3:53 am
89741 spacer
Bored of Brexit now bored of flu hysteria...
>> No. 89751 Anonymous
23rd May 2020
Saturday 2:33 pm
89751 spacer
>>89741
bored of cranking my hog

(A good day to you Sir!)

whiteline
yang.jpg
897318973189731
>> No. 89731 Anonymous
12th May 2020
Tuesday 1:19 pm
89731 How election betting even works?
If I wanted to bet on US elections, how do I do that?

I see there are like hundred betting sites with various promotions
https://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics/us-presidential-election-2020/winner

How do I make the most free money by predicting that Trump will lose?
Expand all images.
>> No. 89732 Anonymous
12th May 2020
Tuesday 2:10 pm
89732 spacer
>>89731
Before the virus came along, I thought he was a shoo in for the election because Americans, stupid etc. Now I'm quite sure that at the current rate of "progress", he is absolutely toast.
>> No. 89734 Anonymous
12th May 2020
Tuesday 3:58 pm
89734 spacer
>>89731
What do you mean how does it work? You put a bet on it just like anything else. Go to a bookie's website.

whiteline
jezza.jpg
869358693586935
>> No. 86935 Anonymous
29th October 2019
Tuesday 8:41 pm
86935 UK election 2019
This man is not going to be the next Prime Minister of the UK, and it's going to be fucking awesome.
1463 posts and 201 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 89034 Anonymous
7th February 2020
Friday 2:17 pm
89034 spacer

David_Florence_Accademia.jpg
890348903489034
>>89030
I bet you would.
>> No. 89035 Anonymous
7th February 2020
Friday 2:24 pm
89035 spacer
>>89034
That's from the Renaissance lad.
>> No. 89036 Anonymous
7th February 2020
Friday 2:38 pm
89036 spacer
>>89035
You're still a bummer.
>> No. 89037 Anonymous
7th February 2020
Friday 7:28 pm
89037 spacer
>>89036
Takes one to know one.
>> No. 89712 Anonymous
11th May 2020
Monday 2:17 pm
89712 spacer

1588794192819.jpg
897128971289712
>>86935

What did you mean by this.

whiteline
brown-react_1626234i.jpg
895918959189591
>> No. 89591 Anonymous
28th April 2020
Tuesday 8:58 am
89591 spacer
10 years ago today, lads. The day Cyclops threw the election.

It was a simpler time, a better time.
63 posts and 4 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 89688 Anonymous
3rd May 2020
Sunday 12:24 pm
89688 spacer
>>89685
>It's really quite baffling they never thought of it sooner.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_slavery
>> No. 89689 Anonymous
3rd May 2020
Sunday 12:29 pm
89689 spacer
Romania retains a lot of its communist governmental inefficiencies, so it's easy to see why it's stagnant. Pair that with less social freedoms and it doesn't seem a very appealing place, especially when you can easily move to a 'better' nation.

It's not neo-colonial or unethical to offer a better deal. Romania could improve itself for the betterment of its people but it isn't. A country can fuck its own people over much more than 'the big bad rich ones'.
>> No. 89690 Anonymous
3rd May 2020
Sunday 1:33 pm
89690 spacer
>>89689
It's a bit hard for the country to improve with such a massive brain drain.
>> No. 89691 Anonymous
3rd May 2020
Sunday 3:45 pm
89691 spacer
>>89687

>you do realise that the British student finance system has no obligation to continue payment once you move abroad?

I don't realise that, because it's not true. You still owe the SLC money and you're obliged to return an Overseas Income Assessment Form if you leave the country for more than three months. The SLC has information-sharing agreements with many European governments and while they have limited ability to enforce repayments in many countries, they can and will pursue you if you ever return to the UK.
>> No. 89697 Anonymous
4th May 2020
Monday 4:45 pm
89697 spacer

6a00d83451cbef69e2022ad3a53a96200d-600wi.jpg
896978969789697
How time flies.

whiteline
_methode_sundaytimes_prod_web_bin_683e5026-28c4-11.jpg
895928959289592
>> No. 89592 Anonymous
28th April 2020
Tuesday 12:59 pm
89592 spacer
Is the tax system in this country a load of smoke and mirrors?

I am a basic rate taxpayer. If I earn an extra £1 then 20p is deducted in income tax, 12p is deducted in national insurance and 9p is deducted for my student loan = 41p is deducted and I receive 59p.

If I was a higher rate taxpayer without a student loan then if I earn an extra £1 then 40p is deducted in income tax and 2p is deducted in national insurance = 42p is deducted and I receive 58p.

That's a difference of 1p. I know there's pitfalls such as the child benefit tax charge and losing your personal allowance over £100,000 but there's also a lot more tax planning opportunities available to them. I don't get why pensioners don't pay national insurance either.

It seems like there's a lot of fannying around at play that they get away with because most people don't understand the basics of personal finance.
2 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 89596 Anonymous
28th April 2020
Tuesday 1:31 pm
89596 spacer
I don't earn enough to pay income tax, so mine is easy to calculate: for every £1 I earn I get £1.
>> No. 89597 Anonymous
28th April 2020
Tuesday 1:40 pm
89597 spacer

CBlKJoiWIAADuOv.png
895978959789597
>>89596
>> No. 89598 Anonymous
28th April 2020
Tuesday 1:59 pm
89598 spacer
If you were on the higher rate you'd have 9p taken off for your loan, so the difference for you would be 10p. Is your problem that a low rate payer (with student loan) would effectively pay the same as a high rate payer (without loan)?

The tax system isn't that complex to wrap your head around and as I understand it's like that because of how it's been done historically (to combine NI and income tax would make sense but is practically a minefield). Certainly, it's not complex enough for the misguided belief 'I won't take a raise because I'll pay more in tax'.
>> No. 89599 Anonymous
28th April 2020
Tuesday 2:17 pm
89599 spacer
>>89598
It was a bit of guesswork; student loans have been going for about 22 years so they won't be applicable to most over the age of 40 and people tend to have their highest earnings later in their careers, as well as that most people who are higher rate taxpayers and have a plan 1 student loan will have either paid it off or be very close to.

I know people who think the moment they reach the higher rate tax band all of their income above the personal allowance is taxed at 40%, meaning you lose money at first, which I've never understood.
>> No. 89602 Anonymous
29th April 2020
Wednesday 12:38 am
89602 spacer
>>89598
>'I won't take a raise because I'll pay more in tax'.
It's rare, but it's certainly possible to lose out on a raise. When the UEL and the HR threshold have been in different places, it's been possible to find yourself in a position where you pay less tax if you get a bigger raise.

I once lost out on a raise twice in the same year. Working in the NHS, I hit my anniversary and gained a point, but it took me over a pension threshold and so I ended up taking home less. A couple of months later, we got the annual 1% raise, but at the same time lost the contracting-out discount for NI. As a result, my gross salary was around £2k higher, but my take-home was around £50 a month less.

whiteline
636340820833333076-062617-BidenPool-SP729.jpg
895698956989569
>> No. 89569 Anonymous
24th April 2020
Friday 11:55 am
89569 spacer
Go Joe
Expand all images.
>> No. 89570 Anonymous
24th April 2020
Friday 12:04 pm
89570 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EDtys1sIq0
>> No. 89571 Anonymous
24th April 2020
Friday 12:05 pm
89571 spacer
>>89570
this meme doesnt fit with this well tbh
>> No. 89572 Anonymous
24th April 2020
Friday 12:05 pm
89572 spacer
>>89570
this meme doesnt fit with this well tbh

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 89573 Anonymous
24th April 2020
Friday 12:31 pm
89573 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4NmtSrqtvI

whiteline
4365.jpg
895278952789527
>> No. 89527 Anonymous
20th April 2020
Monday 2:25 pm
89527 spacer
I know we've had a few interesting discussions on productivity before but I have been having a think about it.

In one of my old jobs there was a point where I was doing the work of almost three people and it was awful. I wasn't rewarded for this and I remained underpaid, which is when it truly dawned on me that employers generally try and see how much work they can get away with piling on people for as little cost as possible; if you work hard the reward is that you'll be given more work to do. Ever since then I have mastered the art of looking busy; I'm trusted to be left to my own devices and even when I'm coasting I'm still one of the most efficient members of the team.

Is one of the main reasons that productivity is relatively low in this country because workers know that their employers will treat them like shit and take them for granted? There's little incentive to work harder if you know that you'll be rewarded for it with exactly the same cost of living pay rise as Tracey at the end of the year, even though she spends half the day talking about her kids and the other half shit-stirring.

I've read quite a few things that suggest businesses in this country are far too short-termist and value a quick profit over longer term sustainability.
Expand all images.
>> No. 89528 Anonymous
20th April 2020
Monday 3:17 pm
89528 spacer
It sounds like you're doing it right. Unless you're more directly involved or senior, your extra efforts are likely wasted beyond a point. As in, the first 10% extra you do is worth more than the next 10% extra that you do. Just arriving on time, meeting deadlines and exceeding them a little pays dividends.

>I've read quite a few things that suggest businesses in this country are far too short-termist and value a quick profit over longer term sustainability.

Well, you have to remember too that decision makers are bound by their own interests. We often have inefficient systems that could be easily improved, but not many managers would want to stand up and rock the boat, let alone risk ruin. Making a decision today that would significantly improve the company over a 20 year timeframe would probably look terrible on your record in the short term.

I've read and heard stuff about the short-term approach that is common here too. There seems to be a tendency to look at the figures at the end of the year and judge things by that. For example, minimum wage has gone up quite sharply in recent years. This has leant itself to companies cutting benefits and reducing staff numbers. For supermarkets I think this worked well, but for shops where innovations (self-checkouts) are harder, it's just stretched out a workforce.

While we may seem phlegmatic, it takes different forms elsewhere. In Italy it's incredibly hard to fire someone, so as soon as you get your contract you can do the bare minimum. If I remember, the Manx get priority for any job over others, meaning that they can be equally unproductive.
>> No. 89531 Anonymous
20th April 2020
Monday 5:08 pm
89531 spacer
>I've read quite a few things that suggest businesses in this country are far too short-termist and value a quick profit over longer term sustainability.

I mean isn't this just the broader over arching ideology that we all toil under? Late stage/neo-liberlal/however you want to define it capitalism.
>> No. 89536 Anonymous
20th April 2020
Monday 7:27 pm
89536 spacer
>>89531
I mean in comparison to other similar nations.
>> No. 89542 Anonymous
21st April 2020
Tuesday 1:28 am
89542 spacer
>>89536

Well yeah then we're pretty bad. Maybe not quite as bad as the yanks but that's not saying much.

Also for the record I agree with your perspective on productivity.

>Is one of the main reasons that productivity is relatively low in this country because workers know that their employers will treat them like shit and take them for granted?

Yep, of course. Because this;

>employers generally try and see how much work they can get away with piling on people for as little cost as possible

is evident to anyone with half a clue.

But then you have to ask why that's the case. Is there something particular to British culture that means it's worse here than other comparable countries. Probably yeah, there are probably all sorts of things that contribute to it. The states being the global hegemon and our unique relationship to them and their culture is I'd imagine a large factor.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 89549 Anonymous
21st April 2020
Tuesday 1:37 pm
89549 spacer
>>89531
On the one hand, yes. But on the other it's a recurring theme in British history. It's not uncommon that when the pound goes down in value British businesses just increase their prices abroad and suck up the extra profits rather than taking advantage of the fact their products are now cheaper abroad and expanding into new markets.

whiteline
tsim fuckis.jpg
894628946289462
>> No. 89462 Anonymous
11th April 2020
Saturday 12:19 pm
89462 spacer
What is the drink-drive limit in the UK in terms of pints roughly?
2 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 89465 Anonymous
11th April 2020
Saturday 12:53 pm
89465 spacer
>>89464

Fair play, he's definitely over the limit. Three cans would put nearly any adult male over, mainly because they lowered it a few years back.
>> No. 89466 Anonymous
11th April 2020
Saturday 12:59 pm
89466 spacer
>>89465

Right then, I'll report the weaselly prick.
>> No. 89467 Anonymous
11th April 2020
Saturday 1:09 pm
89467 spacer
>>89466

He's drunk and I just saw him take a piss in the back garden. If he gets in his car I'm calling 999. What a fucking skank.
>> No. 89468 Anonymous
12th April 2020
Sunday 3:36 pm
89468 spacer
>>89467
Surely there is number for less urgent calls? Just call your local rozzer HQ and report him and his license plate. Dispatch will send a car out looking for him.
>> No. 89469 Anonymous
12th April 2020
Sunday 5:50 pm
89469 spacer
>>89468

>Surely there is number for less urgent calls?

101.

whiteline
64733-thinkstockphotos-1070825996-vladimir-zapleti.jpg
894158941589415
>> No. 89415 Anonymous
5th April 2020
Sunday 11:33 pm
89415 spacer
But, does a God exist?
20 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 89439 Anonymous
6th April 2020
Monday 7:43 am
89439 spacer
I've adopted a sort of syncretistic Discordian-Pyrrhonist-Gnosticism but I don't like talking about it much as I worry it sounds like I'm just taking the piss out of other people's beliefs when it's not really. It's compatible with ideas like
>but doesn't Godel's theorem also hold true if you accept that the results of something "god-like" could also be explained as entropy or chaos

>>89437
I've never looked into what our Quakers believe but I have a lot of respect for them from my interactions with them. Brave, peaceful people.
>> No. 89440 Anonymous
6th April 2020
Monday 7:43 am
89440 spacer
>>89438

As someone who's a year deep into studies on Historical Jesus and the origins of biblical monotheism in ancient Israel I can only say Poo Poo. But you do you, lad.
>> No. 89441 Anonymous
6th April 2020
Monday 10:38 am
89441 spacer
It's become fashionable to be agnostic these days, I feel, and atheism has become associated with those edgy, neckbeard fedora types. It's a tragedy if you ask me, because you have otherwise rational people excusing all sorts of nonsense brain-worms just because they don't want to look like a teenager from 4chan.

As far as I want to be able to give people the freedom to believe in what they want, I really truly can't reconcile how an otherwise intelligent person can practice faith, at least in the traditional, Jeduo-Christian/Iglooist way. It seems to me all too obvious that these religions in particular have, historically, been responsible for altogether more evil than good. Their very roots in culture exist as an early form of social control and manipulation, before we'd invented mass propaganda and the modern police state. Indeed that's the only reason they have become unnecessary.

I think it's a relic of our past we'd really be better off without. There are better philosophical approaches to dealing with the quandary of the unfathomable.
>> No. 89442 Anonymous
6th April 2020
Monday 12:50 pm
89442 spacer
>>89427

People who beleive something anyway prove something they believe anyway, yet fail to convince anyone else. Is the best way of summing up Godel's ontological theorem. it is circular reasoning plain and simple.
>> No. 89443 Anonymous
6th April 2020
Monday 12:58 pm
89443 spacer
>>89420

>I was a militant Christopher Hitchens style atheist

I really hate the equivocation of atheism with this brand of it, it seems like an oversimplified Americanism. And I think the prevailing truth suffers from political tit for tat for it being treated like it is a counter point to Christianity when it isn't and shouldn't behave like it is.

whiteline
1253027_1.jpg
893288932889328
>> No. 89328 Anonymous
11th March 2020
Wednesday 12:31 pm
89328 Budget 2020
Austerity's going to be over, apparently.
Expand all images.
>> No. 89329 Anonymous
11th March 2020
Wednesday 12:45 pm
89329 spacer
>>89328

That's not what my lad Stephen Bush said in the e-mail this morning - and I always listen to Stephen Bush.

(He is better at thinking than me, so I just let him think for me now.)

>Rishi Sunak will announce the biggest expansion in government borrowing in British political history as he approves a slew of infrastructure projects in his budget today, as he takes advantage of the era of low interest rates.

>And they're getting lower: the Bank of England has cut rates to 0.25 per cent in a boost to help the economy see its way through a covid-19 induced economic shock.

>Those two stories illustrate the benefit and the cost of the era of low low interest rates: on the one hand, governments can borrow more than they could in the past. The way that the British government structures its debt means that it may have even great wriggle room than many other states. But the downside is that when you hit an economic downturn, pretty much all the heavy lifting has to be done by fiscal policy, that is, through tax-and-spend.

>That reality is one reason why Sunak may be wise to avoid too much borrowing outside of infrastructure spending and measures to respond to the crisis - and that for all the talk of ending austerity, and the reality of increased spending for police, the NHS and education, the story for large parts of the public realm today will be the continuation of spending restraint rather than its end.
>> No. 89332 Anonymous
11th March 2020
Wednesday 7:17 pm
89332 spacer
£104 less in NI next tax year. Wahey!

If the Tories under Johnson continue like this then Labour are absolutely fucked for the foreseeable future.
>> No. 89333 Anonymous
11th March 2020
Wednesday 7:41 pm
89333 spacer
It's good to see them investing again, and you can certainly see this as a bit of a vindication to Labour's "we won the argument" mantra.

I can't help but feel like it's a bit late though. It's all well and good pledging money for infrastructure when most of it will just go into fixing the damage ten years of neglect has caused.

>>89332

They absolutely are fucked, but not because the Tories have nicked their politics. It's because Labour will do what they always do and piss about trying to position themselves as opposed to all of it, instead of standing up and saying "See? They've admitted we were right all along!" and driving that point home.
>> No. 89335 Anonymous
11th March 2020
Wednesday 8:10 pm
89335 spacer
>>89332
So that's your council tax rise sorted then.
>> No. 89590 Anonymous
27th April 2020
Monday 10:25 am
89590 spacer
>>89589
A curious claim. Which Stuart-era age of austerity were you thinking of?

whiteline
ERsxuK9X0AUxBiV.jpg
892008920089200
>> No. 89200 Anonymous
27th February 2020
Thursday 12:15 pm
89200 spacer
This man has never eaten a crisp before in his life.
56 posts and 4 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 89260 Anonymous
29th February 2020
Saturday 4:33 pm
89260 spacer

actually.png
892608926089260
>>89255
I'm unsure of this claim. The roots of English in Germanic and Romance follow gendered language with the masculine plural as dominant e.g. Ragazzi means both group of male children and children generally in Italian.

While English developed gender neutrality, with limited exception, 'they' needlessly loses specificity (or brings confusion) which must be made up in context. This goes against the point of good communication in conveying information in as concise a way as possible.* Therefore these common folk in the 14-18th century were wrong. This is not to say that you should never use 'they' if not doing so would be rude of course.

*The whole sentence is awful:
>They sound like the kind of person who has made doing things out of spite because they are hurt into a lifestyle choice.
>She sounds like the kind of person who has made doing things out of spite a lifestyle choice.
>> No. 89262 Anonymous
29th February 2020
Saturday 9:30 pm
89262 spacer
>>89259
I believe Shakespeare himself used singular they in a couple of his plays. Chaucer certainly used it. If it's good enough for them, it's good enough for me.
>> No. 89263 Anonymous
29th February 2020
Saturday 9:35 pm
89263 spacer
>>89262

Was it contextually appropriate, like the character not knowing the gender of the person to which they were referring at the time?
>> No. 89264 Anonymous
1st March 2020
Sunday 1:31 pm
89264 spacer
>>89206
'Salted' is not 'Plain'.
>> No. 89265 Anonymous
1st March 2020
Sunday 1:36 pm
89265 spacer
>>89264
Yes it is.

whiteline
nhs propaganda.png
885808858088580
>> No. 88580 Anonymous
16th December 2019
Monday 12:15 pm
88580 spacer
And so it begins.
18 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 88770 Anonymous
23rd December 2019
Monday 2:40 am
88770 spacer
>>88613

That exists it is called basic first aid training you probably had some.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 89021 Anonymous
31st January 2020
Friday 7:43 pm
89021 spacer
So... now we've left what might happen to the NHS?
>> No. 89022 Anonymous
1st February 2020
Saturday 9:00 am
89022 spacer
>>89021
They've already realised they're going to have to lower the salary floor on skilled worker visas to boost immigration.
>> No. 89024 Anonymous
1st February 2020
Saturday 10:14 am
89024 spacer
>>89022

It's almost like they don't want to ease the pressure on wages and upskill British workers at all, and everyone who voted Tory and Brexit because that's what they wanted to happen has been conned.

You wait though, this will be their downfall. Immigration is the political time bomb of our age. When people realise they've been had and that Brexit alone wasn't enough to stop it, that's when they're going to start turning to genuinely nationalist politics.
>> No. 89025 Anonymous
1st February 2020
Saturday 12:45 pm
89025 spacer
>>88580
Reminds me of the famous "Now I'm not racist but" thread we posted from FB many years ago. It was back in the days where you could still scrape FB posts without much of an account, and I remember compiling a list of all the people who posted it... probably not the done thing now.

whiteline
ricky-gervais-golden-globes-2020.jpg
888558885588855
>> No. 88855 Anonymous
6th January 2020
Monday 6:00 pm
88855 spacer
Ricky G took a slash in the vegan soup at the golden globes last night.

https://mobile.twitter.com/alexsalvinews/status/1214003629377478656

References to save you a google.
Felicity Huffman - did 12 days in jail for paying someone to take exams for her daughter. Was in Desperate Housewives.
Ronan Farrow - wrote articles for The New Yorker that were important in the eventual exposure of Harvey Weinstein.
2 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 88859 Anonymous
6th January 2020
Monday 6:20 pm
88859 spacer
I've never been one to care where things get posted but how is this /pol/?
>> No. 88860 Anonymous
6th January 2020
Monday 6:22 pm
88860 spacer
>>88859
"HE SAYS IT LIKE IT IS!" is the cornerstone of modern politics.

I dunno, people keep posting /v/ threads on /iq/ instead so everything has gone all topsy-turvy.
>> No. 88868 Anonymous
6th January 2020
Monday 10:41 pm
88868 spacer
>>88855
This is as /v/ as it gets. He put the screen actors guild on blast, but otherwise it was just really witty.
>> No. 88871 Anonymous
7th January 2020
Tuesday 2:45 am
88871 spacer
Was it funny? No, but I agreed the fuck out of it.
>> No. 88878 Anonymous
7th January 2020
Tuesday 5:51 pm
88878 spacer
>>88871

I don't think it was meant to be funny, it felt quite fucking vitriolic to be quite honest with you.

Regardless, OP probably posted it in /pol/ here because it was all over /pol/ on the other place for the last few days and he felt like fitting in.

whiteline
election2019.png
881228812288122
>> No. 88122 Anonymous
12th December 2019
Thursday 10:01 pm
88122 2019 results thread
CON 368 (MAJ 86)
LAB 191
SNP 55
LD 13
OTH 23

Well fuck.
214 posts and 45 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 88677 Anonymous
18th December 2019
Wednesday 1:27 pm
88677 spacer
>>88674
The graph doesn't show that at all. Where did you learn to infer causality, The Room?
>> No. 88679 Anonymous
18th December 2019
Wednesday 2:11 pm
88679 spacer
If you have to dump a load of charts, open up Paint and stick them into one image or something, you big git.
>> No. 88680 Anonymous
18th December 2019
Wednesday 2:29 pm
88680 spacer
>>88679
Classic trifle fan detected.
>> No. 88684 Anonymous
18th December 2019
Wednesday 2:48 pm
88684 spacer
>>88680
Not him, but don't you fucking dare diss trifle.
>> No. 88877 Anonymous
7th January 2020
Tuesday 1:16 pm
88877 spacer
>>88684

Trifle is awesome. It's the lasagne of desserts

whiteline
Delete Post []
Password  
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]