[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
politics
Subject   (new thread)
Message
File  []
close
whiteline
35001.jpg
844568445684456
>> No. 84456 Anonymous
23rd September 2018
Sunday 8:38 pm
84456 Ban anonymous accounts, Angela Rayner tells social media firms
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/sep/23/ban-anonymous-accounts-angela-rayner-tells-social-media-firms

>The shadow education secretary, speaking at a Labour party conference event, said social media firms should take greater responsibility for their users and noted in particular that Facebook seemed to have indicated that politicians should accept a higher level of abuse.

>Rayner, at a fringe event organised by the Guardian, conceded that insisting on real names wouldn’t stop abuse, but “it would certainly help a little bit. I think they should do more – they do have a responsibility for online.”

I... kind of like Angela Rayner, but this is a truly awful idea that seems to have had absolutely no thought put into its implementation or wider affects on freedom of expression. Technically almost every single account commenting on The Guardian is an "anonymous" social media account because why would you use a real name for such a thing.

I really hope this doesn't gain any kind of traction.
29 posts and 3 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 84881 Anonymous
31st January 2019
Thursday 10:43 am
84881 spacer
>>84473
I'm sorry but how on Earth have you missed the ascot ladies day threads every year? It's one of our grandest traditions.
>> No. 84882 Anonymous
31st January 2019
Thursday 11:19 am
84882 spacer
>>84881
Honestly it's starting to feel played out.
>> No. 84883 Anonymous
31st January 2019
Thursday 4:07 pm
84883 spacer
>>84882

Agreed. I'm not even sure why they bother bringing the horses anymore.
>> No. 84884 Anonymous
31st January 2019
Thursday 6:25 pm
84884 spacer
>>84881
That months old post wont know wot hit it.
>> No. 85068 Anonymous
1st March 2019
Friday 9:00 am
85068 spacer
>>84467

I'd love to slap my man meat in between them, that's for sure.

and then piss all over them after I'm done

whiteline
Untitled.png
848868488684886
>> No. 84886 Anonymous
8th February 2019
Friday 5:22 pm
84886 Right I'm fucked and I've sussed Brexit
Now I'm just a simple lad but it seems to me that the problem really is that some people don't want it and some people do, and those are themselves split into groups about what specifically wanting and not wanting it means; we just can't come to a proper agreement about what Brexit should look like because we all want different things.

So it seems to me that the real issue is that the nation is far too big now to properly represent the wishes of its population. We need more granularity!

I propose that we divide the UK into a number of smaller client kingdoms, all of which are inherited by the current monarch. The boundaries of these client kingdoms would reflect the historical cultures of their inhabitants, for example my idea of a Kingdom of Dál Riata would comprise mainly of those areas of Scotland with high levels of Gaelic speakers, the same for Gwynedd and Kernow (Northern Wales & Cornwall). They have their own languages and peoples, we should let them run their own affairs.

We can then become the United League of Kingdoms of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the ULK. This would take the form of a confederacy in which a Grand Parliament in London would control matters of defence, currency and internal trade.

As a successor state to the UK, we should retain our membership of the EU (with all the concessions and special rights negotiated by the UK) and as a confederacy, it would be down to each individual kingdom to choose whether to (re)invoke article 50 or not, and thus to retain or withdraw membership of the European Union, and could each come to the decision whether to make a Withdrawal Agreement or not. Trade between the kingdoms would be tariff-free except to the EU-remaining ones, where mandatory EU tariffs would apply for imports. This would be okay because these areas will benefit from tariff-free trading with other EU states, whilst non-EU areas would be able to waive tariffs on imports from the EU and would benefit from loosened regulations and increased autonomy which would enable further trade with the rest of the world.

Please let me know your thoughts on this idea otherlad, and don't be insulting now. I've hit a vein of solid fucking gold here and I want to refine it in the smelting pot of britfa.gs /pol/.
15 posts and 4 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 84974 Anonymous
19th February 2019
Tuesday 12:34 am
84974 spacer
>>84919
God bless whoever wrote that in.

Double-edged sword mind, if the Contractor doesn't know what they're doing they'll have put the butter in the fridge and just shredded the bread with lumps of it while preparing the sandwiches. You can't trust anyone.
>> No. 85062 Anonymous
26th February 2019
Tuesday 7:01 pm
85062 spacer
Bumping because I've had another Brexit solution.

We should start our own EU and invite Ireland, France, Germany and Denmark. We can call it the West European Alliance and make it much better and richer than the EU because we won't have all that dead weight from the other countries.
>> No. 85063 Anonymous
26th February 2019
Tuesday 7:49 pm
85063 spacer
>>85062
What if they laugh the UK out of the room?
>> No. 85064 Anonymous
26th February 2019
Tuesday 7:59 pm
85064 spacer
>>85062
Germany likes the dead weight; their industries have benefitted massively from taking advantage of a relatively undervalued currency.
>> No. 85065 Anonymous
27th February 2019
Wednesday 5:32 pm
85065 spacer
>>85062

You want rid of the dead weight but you're inviting Ireland?

whiteline
village idiots.jpg
848348483484834
>> No. 84834 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 10:26 pm
84834 Irish independance is fake and literally impossible
Want to hear a funny joke? The Irish were ruled for 1000 years by England and eventually got their freedom a few decades ago... a few years later they sold themselves to the German EU project.
Looks like they really care about their sovereignty huh?

Ireland, like all the minor British satellite states that orbit England, cannot be a sovereign nation as they lack the size/population/resources to do so. All they do is end up answering to others... namely the continental heathens.

The IRA are pleb boneheads whose 'policy' revolves around ''durr hurr I hate dur english'', they don't care about being someone's bitch as long as it isn't England... quite similar to the boneheads in the Ukraine who want to hate Russia so badly that they will gladly join Germanys EU proxy empire just to spite everyone's favourite KGB badboy.

Ireland prospered under English rule (by and large)… I bet they won't last a century as a German vassal.
13 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 84860 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 5:32 pm
84860 spacer
>>84850


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VstDOv0C1do
>> No. 84861 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 5:47 pm
84861 spacer
>>84860

Yurt
>> No. 84862 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 6:19 pm
84862 spacer
>>84861
Weren't they the bad guys in Animorphs?
>> No. 84863 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 6:44 pm
84863 spacer
>>84860

This is my favourite. It's amazing how much vitriol a drunk provo can belt this one out with, it's hilarious.


>> No. 84885 Anonymous
6th February 2019
Wednesday 2:54 am
84885 spacer
>>84848
Many of the millions of Irish that emirated to America did end up thriving as a result of English rule. I'd also like to add Finland to the list of nation which were driven into the arms by of the Germans by a pattern of genocidal greed and sadistic indifference to human suffering displayed by their immediate neighbors.

(A good day to you Sir!)

whiteline
05B573CA-3A47-444F-B057-266F7A1CFD74.jpg
847328473284732
>> No. 84732 Anonymous
8th January 2019
Tuesday 11:44 pm
84732 spacer
There isn't a single Trump quote that you can't find a corresponding Zapp Brannigan image that fits it perfectly.
28 posts and 9 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 84854 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 1:40 pm
84854 spacer
>>84851

Okay mate. He literally threatened to nuke NK via Twitter. If all you can do is point out that my scenario (said tongue in cheek, but you knew that) is inaccurate, then well done, you win. I'm sure the lad is as stable as he claims.
>> No. 84855 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 1:44 pm
84855 spacer
>>84854
He managed to meet up with Kim, better than most Presidents have achieved.
>> No. 84856 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 1:54 pm
84856 spacer
>>84855

What a bizzare reality we've come to live in.
>> No. 84857 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 2:39 pm
84857 spacer
>>84856

That feels like the most believable part "only nixon could go to china" as they say.
>> No. 84858 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 2:42 pm
84858 spacer
>>84855
Probably because he loves dictators though.

whiteline
2540076170001_5798286395001_5798280612001-vs.jpg
848238482384823
>> No. 84823 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 8:05 pm
84823 spacer
>Diane Abbott has accused BBC Question Time of legitimising racist abuse after claims that the shadow home secretary was singled out before and during Thursday night’s episode of the political discussion programme.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/18/diane-abbott-accuses-bbc-question-time-of-legitimising-dolphin rape

Does that massive sheboon Diane Flab-butt receive a lot of flak because of the colour of her skin or because she's a massively incompetent pompous hypocrite?

(A good day to you Sir!)
8 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 84832 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 9:51 pm
84832 spacer
>>84831
I'm not sure you've grasped the context of that idiom.
>> No. 84836 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 10:40 pm
84836 spacer
>>84832
/pol/'s always had an element of casual dolphin rape to it, hence all the wordfilters, but it's typically seen as acceptable as long as you say it firmly tongue in cheek 👅. For example, I can't recall anyone being banned for mentioning the absent black father trope.
>> No. 84840 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 11:18 pm
84840 spacer
>>84836
Certain posters have had a Cetaceous bent, for sure. This site is overwhelmingly left leaning and overt racist bollocks has always been banned and filtered because, ironically, racists aren't learning animals.

Making a joke, in context, is not something I'd ever ban someone for. This thread ain't that.
>> No. 84841 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 11:43 pm
84841 spacer
I'm sure glad we got rid of the original thread and replaced it with this meta shitshow. This is exactly the kind of thread that belongs outside of /iq/.
>> No. 84842 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 11:48 pm
84842 spacer
>>84841

Good point.

whiteline
vince.png
847578475784757
>> No. 84757 Anonymous
15th January 2019
Tuesday 8:50 pm
84757 vince
The beginning of the end of Brexit.

He's right.
22 posts and 5 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 84810 Anonymous
18th January 2019
Friday 7:53 pm
84810 spacer
>>84809
Corbyn won't do anything because leaving with no deal suits his purpose.
>> No. 84811 Anonymous
18th January 2019
Friday 8:23 pm
84811 spacer
>>84809
>EU was clear with May after sealing the deal , it's that or nothing

Just jumping in to say that the actual line was this is the deal we're getting based on the red lines we came in with. The most consistent Labour argument I've heard is scrapping the immigration control for customs union which would be wholly consistent with EU pillars.

>And let's stop repeating "EU needs more from us than us from EU" that's completely bollocks and debunked by economists.

I'd say it is equally dangerous to play up the EU as a merciless poker player eyeing our trousers. Everyone just wants to get a workable deal and the sides are close allies whose fates are irrevocably tied no matter what happens.

It'll be interesting in a few months if we're out electing people to European Parliament.
>> No. 84812 Anonymous
21st January 2019
Monday 2:51 pm
84812 spacer
>>84809
>And let's stop repeating "EU needs more from us than us from EU" that's completely bollocks and debunked by economists.

I think you mean debunked by the lugenpress.
>> No. 84813 Anonymous
21st January 2019
Monday 4:22 pm
84813 spacer
>>84811

>I'd say it is equally dangerous to play up the EU as a merciless poker player eyeing our trousers. Everyone just wants to get a workable deal and the sides are close allies whose fates are irrevocably tied no matter what happens.

We need a good deal; the EU would prefer a deal, but they're willing to take a knock if the only deal on offer is too favourable to Britain. The consequences of losing their trading relationship with Britain are much less severe than the risk of spawning Greexit and Polanexit. The only deal that the EU are prepared to offer is one that is demonstrably worse than our current status; our parliament may be unwilling to accept such a deal.
>> No. 84814 Anonymous
21st January 2019
Monday 4:47 pm
84814 spacer
>>84813
Several Tory MPs wrote in their letters to Graham Brady "She just doesn't listen". There are three options on the table. Take the deal, extend or revoke the Article 50 notification, or put the matter to the people. Both houses have now rejected the deal. Meanwhile, May is still ruling out the other two options.

whiteline
bn_bean_comp1.jpg
805318053180531
>> No. 80531 Anonymous
27th November 2016
Sunday 11:01 am
80531 Corbyn Mk III: Electric Boogaloo
I think it's time for a new Corbyn thread.

The previous thread (>>73072) is reaching critical mass. In combination with the original thread (>>64990) we've had over 4,700 posts on Dear Leader since August last year. That's a lot of shitposting. Keep up the good work, lads.
1380 posts and 149 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 84521 Anonymous
30th October 2018
Tuesday 11:37 pm
84521 spacer
>>84520
Could you learn how plurals work in English?
>> No. 84789 Anonymous
16th January 2019
Wednesday 6:48 pm
84789 spacer
I'd vote for Tom Watson.
>> No. 84790 Anonymous
16th January 2019
Wednesday 6:56 pm
84790 spacer
>>84789
I think I'd vote for Gove given that speech. Fucking hell.
>> No. 84791 Anonymous
16th January 2019
Wednesday 6:56 pm
84791 spacer
>>84790
Gove is also excellent here. One trip over the numbers but otherwise very good.
>> No. 84794 Anonymous
16th January 2019
Wednesday 8:07 pm
84794 spacer

pob.jpg
847948479484794
>>84790

Pob has got some serious Big Dick Energy today.

whiteline
SCREEN-01-1024x723.png
845608456084560
>> No. 84560 Anonymous
24th November 2018
Saturday 1:09 pm
84560 Our government isn't totally incompetent
https://www.cyberguerrilla.org/blog/operation-integrity-initiative-british-informational-war-against-all/

Someone up in there's still playing statecraft properly. Even if this piece has been busted by some Anons.

https://www.scribd.com/document/392195802/The-Integrity-Initiative-Guide-to-Countering-Russian-Disinformation-May-2018-v1 is a nice brief on modern disinformation tactics.
10 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 84726 Anonymous
31st December 2018
Monday 11:55 pm
84726 spacer
>>84725
Good work, comrade. 5 rubles have been deposited into your account.
>> No. 84727 Anonymous
1st January 2019
Tuesday 12:49 am
84727 spacer
>>84726
Traditionally it's 15 rubles, actually.
>> No. 84728 Anonymous
1st January 2019
Tuesday 12:51 am
84728 spacer
>>84727
Budgets are tight, and train tickets to Salisbury aren't cheap.
>> No. 84729 Anonymous
1st January 2019
Tuesday 4:23 pm
84729 spacer
>>84726

Was this the last post of the year? That's somewhat disappointing.
>> No. 84730 Anonymous
1st January 2019
Tuesday 4:36 pm
84730 spacer
>>84729
Half past two.

whiteline
IMG_0313-1500x544.jpg
843428434284342
>> No. 84342 Anonymous
14th July 2018
Saturday 11:29 pm
84342 spacer
In a string of texts Griffiths called himself “Daddy”, promised money if he received racy images and described perverted and rough sex he claimed to have had with other women.

The shamed Tory wrote:

• “I’m going to need something filthy to put a smile on my face. I want to see you both naked.”

• “Take off the bra and panties… you’ve got Daddy in such a frenzy.”

• “I’m going to bring you to London and do whatever I want to you.”

• “I’m thinking maybe we need a flat for Daddy’s girls. I’m taken by you both. You girls are spectacular.”

Many more messages go into shocking detail about his liking for certain sexual acts and are too disgusting to print in full.


https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/married-tory-minister-andrew-griffiths-12919581
37 posts and 3 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 84710 Anonymous
22nd December 2018
Saturday 3:05 pm
84710 spacer
>>84342
>>84666



I'd really like to know why nobody just says: "OK, I did wrong, I behaved like a pig, I am sorry." All this melodrama with the (probably fake) hospitalisation, mental breakdown and revelation of (GASP!) childhood abuse feel just like deep denial. At least to me. It looks like manning up and admitting your own faults went out of fashion.
>> No. 84711 Anonymous
22nd December 2018
Saturday 3:26 pm
84711 spacer
>>84710

I'd respect anyone who would just say "Yeah I cheated on my wife and I'm into 19 year olds, but none of that affects my work, so get over it"

Not entirely sure why we should expect him to apologise at all to anyone but his missu, and that certainly shouldn't be done in public.
>> No. 84712 Anonymous
22nd December 2018
Saturday 3:30 pm
84712 spacer
>>84711

BoJo, Trump and Saville have shown the power of brazenness in politics. It probably doesn't say great things about our society, but a lot of people respect someone who just says "I'm an arsehole, I'm not going to change for anyone, deal with it".
>> No. 84713 Anonymous
22nd December 2018
Saturday 3:33 pm
84713 spacer
>>84712

I find this works in real life, too. People seem comfortable with a wanker as long as they're self aware and unapologetic about it.

I think it might be because we don't actually believe nice people are nice.
>> No. 84714 Anonymous
22nd December 2018
Saturday 4:22 pm
84714 spacer
>>84712
I think the effect is probably more on the public at large than at the bubble they're in. I mean be honest, does anyone in the general public actually know who this guy is? It's more the kind of scandal that bothers people in the westminster-media-that-kind-of-thing bubble, the people who actually vaguely know about him. If you appeal beyond them to the general public, the general public will either find out you exist and some of them will be with you, or they'll respond with silence - proving they're not actually outraged at all.

I feel like the UK could do with someone truly Brazen, someone who doesn't equivocate on their nastiness or retreat, a sort of Trump type, just to show that emperor middle-class decency is well and truly in the nude. Perhaps our libel laws are why that's not happened yet.

whiteline
2BD6CE55-E7F8-4355-8BD4-0E85E6AC7FC7.jpg
843688436884368
>> No. 84368 Anonymous
15th July 2018
Sunday 3:20 pm
84368 Fuckin' Trumpet
Why did he bow to the Rothchilds but not ARE Madge? Fucking bumder.
5 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 84384 Anonymous
16th July 2018
Monday 8:21 pm
84384 spacer
>>84378

You just can't comprehend his twelve-dimensional chess level swamp draining master plan.
>> No. 84398 Anonymous
12th August 2018
Sunday 1:28 am
84398 spacer

space.jpg
843988439884398
>>84384

I can because autism

We are legion
>> No. 84399 Anonymous
12th August 2018
Sunday 2:37 am
84399 spacer
>>84398
I spent way to long looking for a smokester in this image, only to come to the realisation you're a clown with less wit than an Ed Miliband after-dinner speech.
>> No. 84401 Anonymous
12th August 2018
Sunday 3:09 am
84401 spacer

a kv12.jpg
844018440184401
>>84399

DERP
>> No. 84642 Anonymous
19th December 2018
Wednesday 1:38 pm
84642 spacer
>>84368

insert anti-Semitic joke here

(A good day to you Sir!)

whiteline
maxresdefault.jpg
844988449884498
>> No. 84498 Anonymous
17th October 2018
Wednesday 6:56 am
84498 spacer
Why is politics so much less fun these days?

It feels like the time of spectacular gaffes, John Prescott walloping someone for throwing an egg at him, Gordon Brown's live reaction to finding out he'd been recorded calling someone a bigot, Ed Miliband and his EdStone, are over. It seems as though we're now instead in the time of conspiracy theorists and the tinfoil hatters have taken over the mainstream or that perhaps social media storms are sucking the fun out of everything.
6 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 84505 Anonymous
18th October 2018
Thursday 10:22 am
84505 spacer
>>84498
A lower calibre of politician. Even in 1997, The Times was calling Theresa May out on being a Robo-Politician.
Blair, Brown and Prescott were equally a step down from men like Callaghan, Healey and Benn who'd fought in the war, and even they were the B-team to Attlee and Churchill.

The other problems are economics and time. You've already got weaker raw material (political personalities), now you've got to satirise them on a shoestring budget, and you need to have the whole thing written, filmed, edited and on telly by next week because we want it to be topical and even on this timescale, by next week your satire is going to seem dated. Under these circumstances, is it surprising you get so many out-of-touch, received wisdom, this-isn't-very-funny takes on Trump, May and Corbyn from people in the same social circle?

>>84499
I think even apart from alternative news, it's partially the collapse of mass media. Even if you stick to a single news site, the non-linear way you can explore it means we could both come out of a visit to the BBC News site with a completely different impression of the world. Compare with television where you'd got 4 broadly similar channels and you had to pick one of them even if it meant sitting through a documentary about flower arranging.

>>84501
On Trump, I like the line a friend gave me from the Simpsons: The pie gag only works when the sap's got dignity!
The Clinton campaign shooting itself in the foot was quite funny, if you're a bit of a political wonk type of a certain persuasion, but Trump clowning around wasn't funny because he was just an undignified clown. He couldn't lower himself, and Bush had already lowered the office.
>> No. 84506 Anonymous
18th October 2018
Thursday 11:15 am
84506 spacer
>>84505
>You've already got weaker raw material (political personalities), now you've got to satirise them on a shoestring budget, and you need to have the whole thing written, filmed, edited and on telly by next week because we want it to be topical and even on this timescale, by next week your satire is going to seem dated.

HIGNFY gave up long ago and is now largely "here's some things we hastily found on Twitter."
>> No. 84508 Anonymous
18th October 2018
Thursday 4:47 pm
84508 spacer
>>84505
> Even in 1997, The Times was calling Theresa May out on being a Robo-Politician. Blair, Brown and Prescott were equally a step down from men like Callaghan, Healey and Benn who'd fought in the war, and even they were the B-team to Attlee and Churchill.

Hear, hear.
>> No. 84639 Anonymous
19th December 2018
Wednesday 1:30 pm
84639 spacer
>>84498

feral utopianism, where political ideology is transformed into a perverse caricature of faith.
>> No. 84641 Anonymous
19th December 2018
Wednesday 1:38 pm
84641 spacer

MV5BNDNlYTFhZWMtNjkxZC00ZjIwLWI5N2EtZmU3Y2Q2MDQ2ND.jpg
846418464184641
>>84635>>84634>>84637>>84633>>84639
Got a visa, lad?

whiteline
frankfieldprimeminister.png
844318443184431
>> No. 84431 Anonymous
31st August 2018
Friday 12:01 am
84431 frank field
This man is going to be the next Prime Minister and it's going to be fucking awesome.
Expand all images.
>> No. 84432 Anonymous
31st August 2018
Friday 12:22 am
84432 spacer
>>84431
You really know how to hurt a guy.
>> No. 84433 Anonymous
31st August 2018
Friday 4:01 pm
84433 spacer
Can Labour just stop being twats? It's beyond tiresome.
>> No. 84434 Anonymous
2nd September 2018
Sunday 1:37 am
84434 spacer
>>84433

Everything will be free in the utopia
>> No. 84435 Anonymous
2nd September 2018
Sunday 7:30 pm
84435 spacer

Dl4luURX0AA-tnn.jpg
844358443584435


whiteline
images.jpg
844028440284402
>> No. 84402 Anonymous
15th August 2018
Wednesday 2:37 am
84402
Orwellian hells life IRL.
Talking of gaslighting techs performed on exussr grounds.
17 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 84425 Anonymous
16th August 2018
Thursday 6:00 pm
84425 spacer
>>84423
A name transplant.
>> No. 84426 Anonymous
16th August 2018
Thursday 9:32 pm
84426 spacer
>>84425

By all results of such existence, too much of disappointments and of troubles that i have earnt already, no name transplant in help for such, i know no ways without wonders tbh.

Where's lots of love there's lots of fails, where is no love there's fail in all.
>> No. 84427 Anonymous
19th August 2018
Sunday 6:33 am
84427 spacer
A sound mind is in a sound body. All you need is recourses enough to sound nutrition
>> No. 84429 Anonymous
23rd August 2018
Thursday 11:22 am
84429 spacer
>>84422
Sorry but I hate and fear people like your mother.
>> No. 84430 Anonymous
23rd August 2018
Thursday 6:33 pm
84430 spacer
>>84429

I don't think you are wrong to, it is a wonder that I am as reasoned person as I am really, but I have ended up with a handful of psychological disorders. My father is just as much of an arsehole but in different ways, he has at least admitted he has a problem, (that he now gets therapy for) but in an 'I can't help it' way that absolves him of his own guilt and is an insult to me.

I think I would have probably turned out better if I went into foster care.

I primary keep contact with either of them is because I want inheritance. Which as fucked up as it sounds and makes me, is the best solution I've come up with for my situation. Keep them at a distance, don't let her in my head, appear for major events.

I can imagine my mother as a final insult and act of narcissism giving all the money to the church though. If that happens I guess she will have out played me to the end.

whiteline
leo-leandro-martinez-screenshot0143[1].jpg
842278422784227
>> No. 84227 Anonymous
3rd May 2018
Thursday 7:47 pm
84227 spacer
Why did are Theresa pick this muppet to be home secretary?
15 posts and 4 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 84278 Anonymous
16th May 2018
Wednesday 1:47 pm
84278 spacer
>>84277

Isn’t that a lamb though?
>> No. 84279 Anonymous
16th May 2018
Wednesday 2:31 pm
84279 spacer
>>84278
Yes. Time to self-flagellate in Siberia for 5 years as penance.
>> No. 84280 Anonymous
16th May 2018
Wednesday 3:11 pm
84280 spacer
>>84278
Tories out of touch with reality as usual.
>> No. 84281 Anonymous
16th May 2018
Wednesday 3:20 pm
84281 spacer
>>84277
> given a state-issued goat to do with as they please

I'd make a two banging curries and two racks of ribs, myself.
>> No. 84282 Anonymous
16th May 2018
Wednesday 3:43 pm
84282 spacer
>>84281
Only two curries? Are you cooking for the whole street?

whiteline
Delete Post []
Password  
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]