[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
news

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply [Last 50 posts]
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 9430)
Message
File  []
close
_77623460_breaking_image_large-3.png
943094309430
>> No. 9430 Anonymous
26th January 2016
Tuesday 10:09 pm
9430 spacer
Locked
Huddersfield charity shop finally says goodbye to a shutter which lasted 26 years


http://www.examiner.co.uk/news/west-yorkshire-news/huddersfield-charity-shop-finally-says-10780879

That's it. That's literally it. A charity shop has replaced one of its roller shutters after having the same one for 26 years. It's all go in Huddersfield.

I challenge you lads to find a more pointless news story than this.
1799 posts omitted. Last 50 posts shown. Expand all images.
>> No. 36202 Anonymous
3rd December 2021
Friday 7:00 pm
36202 spacer
>A company has come forward to own up to flying an X-rated banner over Leeds last Thursday afternoon which left people in stitches.

>Social media was awash with comments after a banner which said "it's not that hard to find the clit" flew over the city as part of a campaign.

>Now Naked Grapefruit has confirmed it was the culprit behind the stunt. Vic, who founded Naked Grapefruit, almost 2 years ago said: "The aim of the campaign is to get people talking about female pleasure. To normalise the topic and make it a part of every day conversation."

>The brand had interpreted the idea of 'missing cat posters' around Leeds for people to get involved in the hunt to 'find the clit,' with the concept of it not being that hard to find. Vic added: "The joke was that it is so easy to find."

>Vic has birthed her business from personal experience and passions in a bid to reduce the gender gap with light hearted fun, and is is hoping to expand as a company. Her vision is to build a brand that normalises women talking about sex, she says: "Woman don't orgasm during sex and that's something we need to talk about."

https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/news/leeds-news/mystery-behind-x-rated-banner-22319932

How exactly does this business make money?
>> No. 36203 Anonymous
3rd December 2021
Friday 7:07 pm
36203 spacer
>>36202

They sell poundshop vibrators for £25.99.

https://nakedgrapefruit.com/product/first-base/
>> No. 36205 Anonymous
3rd December 2021
Friday 7:43 pm
36205 spacer
>>36203

And they paid a drunken monkey 50p and a hand job for that fuckawful website, saving plenty for a plane banner.
Sure, you shouldn't feel shame for sticking things up various orifices, but you absolutely should feel shame for such a wretched bit of web design. Well, I say design, more like congealment.
>> No. 36206 Anonymous
3rd December 2021
Friday 8:31 pm
36206 spacer
>>36202

A mate of mine's missus owns a sex shop with products tailored specifically to cancer sufferers. I mean, cancer's a fucking awful thing and I'm sure being able to have a nice big wank would help you take your mid off the awfulness of it all, but it does seem like a very narrow niche.
>> No. 36207 Anonymous
3rd December 2021
Friday 8:37 pm
36207 spacer
>>36206
How do you specifically tailor a sex toy for cancer sufferers?
>> No. 36208 Anonymous
3rd December 2021
Friday 8:53 pm
36208 spacer

love_cherry.jpg
362083620836208
>>36207

https://www.sexwithcancer.com/product/sh-cherry-love-ball/

*"A fun tool for kegel / pelvic floor strengthening exercises, the Cherry Love Ball also doubles as a sex toy for masturbation, oral sex and BDSM play. The ball is one of a set that helps with incontinence and weakening due to cancer treatments."*

Apparently it's supposed to help with incontinence brought on by cancer as well as being a masturbation aid, or something.
>> No. 36209 Anonymous
3rd December 2021
Friday 8:55 pm
36209 spacer
>>36207
I have no idea, but cancer treatments fuck up your body so badly that it's not as silly as it sounds.
>> No. 36210 Anonymous
3rd December 2021
Friday 9:06 pm
36210 spacer
>>36209
I did read before that ejaculating if you've had prostate cancer is awful because it's essentially dry heaving.
>> No. 36212 Anonymous
3rd December 2021
Friday 10:58 pm
36212 spacer
>>36202

She's got a good sense of humour, I'll give her that.

But I'd be lying if I didn't say that type of vacuous sexually oriented fisherpersonry really pisses me off. I mean, clearly she's projecting pretty hard based on her own negative sexual experiences.

Bet she's a right pillow princess.
>> No. 36213 Anonymous
3rd December 2021
Friday 11:05 pm
36213 spacer
>>36212
It's the difference in cultures in the battle of the sexes. Because, conventionally, all men want to have sex with any woman and any woman wants nothing to do with the men who ask, these messages always come across as enormously offensive, to me at least. These women don't want to be criticised for relishing having the thing every man wants and doesn't have. That's fine, of course, but it always feels like when rich wankers say they shouldn't be hated for their flashy watches and Audi TTs. Fuck you; you're rich. I refuse to empathise with your mild inconvenience.
>> No. 36215 Anonymous
4th December 2021
Saturday 12:30 am
36215 spacer
>>36202
>Oh, but don’t you just sell vibrators, like other sex companies? Nah. Around 90% of brands in the space are male owned, profiting from outdated ideals and expectations or wrapping things up in a pink bow and calling it feminism. We’re here to do it differently.

>you’ll probs be shocked to learn it’s NOT another overly confident white man. Instead, you’ve got me, Vic, an average Northerner in London, bumbling about the East, seemingly pissing off all of the right people.

It's good that they're making their products in female run factories too.

>it's not that hard to find the clit
This always fucks me off. I'm sure it's very easy when it's attached to you, but not so much when you're fumbling about in a dimly lit room. How hard is it to give the lad some gentle guidance if his fingering is unsatisfactory? You don't even have to form a sentence. Just move his hand about until it's in the right place for fuck's sake.
>> No. 36216 Anonymous
4th December 2021
Saturday 12:59 am
36216 spacer
>>36215
You can find it with a little effort. Tongue goes in, tongue goes up, pull tongue back, it's near there. Also, have large tongue.

I get frustrated myself when that isn't enough, even though obviously it wouldn't be. There's this notion that a clitoris is the ultimate orgasm switch, and if you can lay a finger on it then she'll suddenly thrash about like you've shot her with a Taser. Silly men; the only reason - the ONLY reason - you're not the king of the bedroom is you can't find the clitoris. Then you find it, and absolutely nothing happens. Of course it doesn't; it's basically the female banjo string. You find it and then the real work begins. But nobody says that. In the end, I give it a vigorous lick and expect the room to light up like New Year's Eve fireworks, and I feel inadequate when that doesn't happen. And it's the fault of women like her, and her massive overselling of the mystical magic properties of the lady-bellend. Cow.
>> No. 36217 Anonymous
4th December 2021
Saturday 3:54 am
36217 spacer
>>36215

>I'm sure it's very easy when it's attached to you, but not so much when you're fumbling about in a dimly lit room.

It's not as if it's hidden away, you just follow the flaps and there it is. If you're actually paying attention rather than just mindlessly pawing at her groin, it's absolutely trivial to find the clit by touch.

The problem, as >>36216 suggests, is that most women are bloody hard work.
>> No. 36218 Anonymous
4th December 2021
Saturday 7:16 am
36218 spacer
I've always assumed "find the clitoris" meant pay attention to it rather than focusing solely on the hole, instead of it being difficult to locate.
>> No. 36222 Anonymous
4th December 2021
Saturday 12:04 pm
36222 spacer
>>36217

>you’ll probs be shocked to learn it’s NOT another overly confident white man. Instead, you’ve got me, Vic, an average Northerner in London, bumbling about the East, seemingly pissing off all of the right people.

I was however not that surprised that she's a white woman who went to a russell group uni.
>> No. 36255 Anonymous
7th December 2021
Tuesday 12:30 am
36255 spacer
>>36202
They've been flyposting fucking stickers all over Kirkstall and Burley the past month too like some BRILLIANT guerrilla marketing campaign. I wish they'd just fuck off.
>> No. 36259 Anonymous
8th December 2021
Wednesday 3:21 pm
36259 spacer

Ei_mq9yXsAAh6l_.jpg
362593625936259
>A man who travels round on a boat deterring kids from a life of crime has been told to "put his money where his mouth is" as he was spared jail for robbing a 16-year-old of a bike.

>Known to many as 'yellow boat man', Tiggz Dat Author, who was previously known as Stephen Bullock, has travelled from Nottingham to Derby trying to raise awareness for children to stay away from crime and keep their lives on track.

>The incident occurred on October 19, 2019, in Aspley, when his teenage victim was riding on his grandfather's electric bicycle to his address to return it to him. After stopping outside a shop, he was approached by Tiggz Dat Author who claimed it was his bicycle, the court heard. Stuart Pattinson, prosecuting, said: "He shouted 'do you want me to bang you in your face?'

>When Tiggz Dat Author, 34, of no fixed address, was shown the footage in court, he told the judge: "Looking back on it, I could have done things a lot differently. I apologise for that."

https://www.nottinghampost.com/news/local-news/yellow-boat-man-ends-up-6315175
>> No. 36260 Anonymous
8th December 2021
Wednesday 3:42 pm
36260 spacer
>>36259

carpet-bagger.
>> No. 36261 Anonymous
8th December 2021
Wednesday 5:46 pm
36261 spacer
>>36259
I feel like if this man told me to do something I would immediately do the opposite. I can't imagine how many kids he's turned onto a life of crime after witnessing what going straigth can do to you, hundreds? Thousands?
>> No. 36265 Anonymous
8th December 2021
Wednesday 7:25 pm
36265 spacer
>>36261
>going straight
Non-ironic wearers of string vests are anything but. Ban this sick filth.
>> No. 36290 Anonymous
9th December 2021
Thursday 4:58 pm
36290 spacer
>>36265

What kind of mongoloid wears their debit card around their neck?
>> No. 36292 Anonymous
9th December 2021
Thursday 5:10 pm
36292 spacer
>>36290
Oh, God, you're right. I never even thought to look, maybe it's an ironic thing like when I covered my iPhone's logo with a "reduced to to 10p" sticker from Asda.
>> No. 36475 Anonymous
23rd December 2021
Thursday 4:35 pm
36475 spacer

330650710.jpg
364753647536475
Woman jailed over cocaine-fuelled sex with dog in disgusting incident

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/woman-jailed-over-cocaine-fuelled-25770541

Bloke in a wig.
>> No. 36478 Anonymous
23rd December 2021
Thursday 7:38 pm
36478 spacer

MV5BMjAxMjYyODMxM15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNjc3Mjg0MjE@._.jpg
364783647836478
>>36475
Hattie Hayridge has let herself go.
>> No. 36479 Anonymous
24th December 2021
Friday 12:09 pm
36479 spacer
>>36475
kind of feel like this is being ignored, so I'll say it; what the fuck?
I'm guessing the name would have to have been changed by deed poll?
Thinking about it, the linked picture could hardly be an official mugshot else any disguise could be claimed an identity.

Has anyone bothered to read further into this case?
>> No. 36480 Anonymous
24th December 2021
Friday 12:22 pm
36480 spacer
>>36479

Maybe they're trans, you shitlord.
>> No. 36481 Anonymous
24th December 2021
Friday 12:23 pm
36481 spacer
A BBC climate change correspondent has only just discovered the phenomenon of vandalism on Wikipedia.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-59452614
>> No. 36482 Anonymous
24th December 2021
Friday 12:34 pm
36482 spacer

F.jpg
364823648236482
>>36479
>Claire Goodier - who was previously known as John
>Listed under a male name but with a note added to be addressed in the hearing as Claire
>Sent to a men's prison because [they are] legally a male

Glad to learn our system can protect vulnerable trans people.
>> No. 36483 Anonymous
24th December 2021
Friday 12:54 pm
36483 spacer
>>36480
Isn't there a point, where actual trans people look at cases like this one, and say what the actual fuck?
>> No. 36484 Anonymous
24th December 2021
Friday 1:06 pm
36484 spacer
>>36483
It probably comes just before the point where they look at cases like this and thing "For fuck's sake, someone's going to try to make this about me".
>> No. 36485 Anonymous
24th December 2021
Friday 1:06 pm
36485 spacer
>>36483

The fuck are you on about? They're likely not surprised the system has failed yet another trans person.
>> No. 36486 Anonymous
24th December 2021
Friday 1:14 pm
36486 spacer
>>36480
>>36480
Would you suggest to allow someone a traffic cone on head because they identify themselves as a vehicle Wizard? What if a person could apply copious makeup to literally disguise their appearance? Official, legal state busininess, I'm talking - mugshots the police use to identify people of significance. Clearly the idea is absurd - any legal system convinced to allow it would be a mockery of itself and the people who uphold it. Hence why I thought it important to ask and investigate my concern.

The fact is that you gotta take these cases on an individual basis.
This person has been described as 'manipulative and deceitful' by a recognised authority and has been charged with posession of indecent images of children. The mention of 'frank and honest' to this persons character strikes more as 'fair cop, governor' than positive personal traits.

The dressing of this person is, arguably, of a sexual nature, not lifestyle or inner calling. I do not deny this person may feel confused about their gender expression, but they're clearly willing to act on their more socially dangerous impulses - even relish in memory.

We all want to ride the red rocket, but a person who's going to network with others to forfill their deviant fantasies, then carry around a trophy of it is clearly a dangerous person you wouldn't want around your non-binary teenage ofspring, right?

You gotta protect the unicorns from the predatory type of 'trans' who I believe intend to abuse any percieved loophole of law they can; any way to gain advantage enough to see thier worldview manifest.

So excuse me for questioning this persons pronoun you fucking spud.
>> No. 36487 Anonymous
24th December 2021
Friday 1:16 pm
36487 spacer
>>36486
>>36483
Do you thick bastards really think someone on .gs was earnestly calling you a "shitlord"? Get a grip.
>> No. 36488 Anonymous
24th December 2021
Friday 1:18 pm
36488 spacer
>>36487
You got anything interesting to add to the thread, m8?
>> No. 36489 Anonymous
24th December 2021
Friday 1:41 pm
36489 spacer
>>36488

Do you?

I think on. gs we're over it by now. There's people cynically calling themselves trans when anybody with an ounce of sense can see they're not, and the state of the political/cultural climate is such that the authorities can't do right for doing wrong whichever way they deal with it. Indeed it would seem the state of affairs is such that that's the case no matter how you feel about it, it's a thoroughly poisoned well.

Leave it til tomorrow when we've all had a few too many buck's fizzes, and we're all ratty from forced familial socialisation. Then we'll have a good couple of cunt offs over the remains of the Matchmakers and Fox's biscuit selection.
>> No. 36490 Anonymous
24th December 2021
Friday 2:05 pm
36490 spacer
>>36482
You lot are all focused on the wrong thing. Me, I noticed that she has a facemask exempt pass she probably bought on ebay because the mild discomfort is more important than harming anyone working in the court.

I'd say throw her to the dogs but that might be a mistake. I hope she gets (consensually) bummed by the prison catboy and then gets cat covid.
>> No. 36491 Anonymous
24th December 2021
Friday 11:50 pm
36491 spacer
Looks like I failed to distract you all from having a cunt-off by posting that Wikipedia thing. Merry Christmas you horrible shower.
>> No. 36492 Anonymous
25th December 2021
Saturday 12:30 am
36492 spacer
>>36489

>There's people cynically calling themselves trans when anybody with an ounce of sense can see they're not

Please explain how to spot these people - assume I have less than an ounce of sense, but can follow guidance.
>> No. 36493 Anonymous
25th December 2021
Saturday 12:36 am
36493 spacer
>>36492
Well, let's be honest. The dude in a wig isn't trans, he's just a fucking deviant who is using any and all excuses to get out of the fact that he's a peadohile also into bestiality, and also a very bad person. I respect people who might have grown up in the wrong skin, but he's just a wrong'un and it's obvious, but the public discourse right now means that nobody can call him out without seeming like a bigot.
>> No. 36494 Anonymous
25th December 2021
Saturday 1:03 am
36494 spacer
>>36493

You've still not explained how you can tell.
>> No. 36495 Anonymous
25th December 2021
Saturday 9:27 am
36495 spacer
>>36494

By looking.

I included the clause "anyone with sense" for a reason. It really is just an intuition thing, but it's one of the times its valid. The same intuition you use to judge whether a tramp asking you for money is actually homeless and down on their luck, or just a common/garden smackhead trying their luck.

I don't know if people can be educated in "Street smarts" or whatever you want to call it but perhaps this is where I can pitch my big plan to fix society. Like a more reasonable Pol Pot, I propose we make everyone do a form of national service between 18-21. They will be given a minimum wage job at Tesco or on the phones at EE or the like, and they will be given a flat above a takeaway in Rotherham. They will work and live as a commoner for three years regardless of their background.

Only those who complete this service will be allowed to vote or enter policymaking.
>> No. 36496 Anonymous
25th December 2021
Saturday 9:49 am
36496 spacer
>>36495
Didn’t Pulp explain why that doesn’t work like 25 years ago?
>> No. 36497 Anonymous
25th December 2021
Saturday 9:56 am
36497 spacer
>>36496

Ah the problem there is the song's deuteragonist was only pretending. What we would do is suspend their bank accounts and cut them off from their family, after transplanting them to a council estate at the opposite end of the country, so they have to make do with nothing but their own wage and their wits, like a fresh off the boat immigrant. Anyone found to be aiding them materially will sentenced to whatever we did with draft-dodgers back in the day.
>> No. 36498 Anonymous
25th December 2021
Saturday 10:25 am
36498 spacer
>>36495

>It really is just an intuition thing, but it's one of the times its valid

Oh, ok. I hadn't realised you'd declared it was valid. Carry on.
>> No. 36499 Anonymous
25th December 2021
Saturday 7:13 pm
36499 spacer

Pizza on a sea.gif
364993649936499
>>36492
>>36494
>>36498
As we learned from the exchange here >>/emo/31322, there are people who will bandwagon a cause in an effort to forward their own agenda. In this case it reads (and I dare say looks) as though sexual deviancy is the driving factor of this persons identity rather than gender dysphoria. You can make way to identify this by deduction of the news report.
If my opinion is bigotted I welcome insight that might break me from it.
>> No. 36500 Anonymous
25th December 2021
Saturday 7:21 pm
36500 spacer
>>36499

I just don't see a world in which they're an unhinged deviant and playing three dimensional idpol chess at the same time.
>> No. 36501 Anonymous
25th December 2021
Saturday 7:25 pm
36501 spacer
>>36500

Then you are very naive. It's barely even one dimensional. It's a plain simple "But but, I belong to [protected group], you have to go easy on me!" plea that wrong 'uns like that have been using since forever.
>> No. 36502 Anonymous
26th December 2021
Sunday 8:49 am
36502 spacer
>>36500
It's a bloke in a dress mate, snakes and ladders is a push.
>> No. 36582 Anonymous
4th January 2022
Tuesday 12:47 pm
36582 spacer

FIN6HkwXIAQR-Q9.jpg
365823658236582

>> No. 36584 Anonymous
4th January 2022
Tuesday 7:22 pm
36584 spacer
>Russia, China, Britain, U.S. and France say no one can win nuclear war

>China, Russia, Britain, the United States and France have agreed that a further spread of nuclear arms and a nuclear war should be avoided, according to a joint statement by the five nuclear powers published by the Kremlin on Monday.
https://www.reuters.com/world/china/russia-china-britain-us-france-say-no-one-can-win-nuclear-war-2022-01-03/

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password