>>6395
>>6396
Thanks both for the estimate on pricing.

>have you ever found anywhere that does boxer shorts which have the dick-opening but NO BLOODY BUTTONS?
It depends if you want proper oldschool boxers or modern boxer-briefs. I buy these, which have no buttons, but a sort of double alternating flap arrangement to prevent escape:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00K4S97D4

>>6394
>20 custom clothing items, without label.
It sounds like you're outfitting a uniformed crew. What you up to m8?

>>6396
Sorry didn't fully digest your first paragraph. I'm down south so don't worry about asking your friend, but thanks for the offer.

Regatta stuff looks promising though, I'll look through their options. Cheers lad.

>>6396
>https://www.regattaprofessional.com/files/2021%20Reg%20Pro%20UK%20D%20F%20NL.pdf
Why are all their trousers named like they're sequels to shitty action films?

>>6397
>>6398
Thank you very much for those suggestions. Even if they don't have what I want (a horizontal dick window?!?!?), they will give me some clues on what sort of words I'll need to search for, so it's incredibly helpful.

You can't go wrong with Uniqlo Heattech.

https://www.uniqlo.com/uk/en/men/innerwear-loungewear/innerwear

Aldi usually do good value thermal underwear at this time of year, but things are a bit weird due to logisticsgeddon and there are no guarantees.

British Thermals do a good longjohn. I've had a pack of 3 for a few years, usually worn under oversized corduroys. they're brilliant - worth the £15 price tag, but it's pushing it a bit.
I'd avoid 3/4 lengths, you can really feel the difference at your ancles even in full length ones.
Thanks for reminding me to buy a vest.

https://www.britishthermals.com/

>>6382

What did I say about that prick?

Thanks both.

>>6383
Yeah .. mine have a cock window in the front, nothing like the pics shown. Maybe i got a old design? Still, the thermals are worn beneath your usual clothes, so you'll only feel like a prick.

>>6368
>Adidas Gazelle

I don't know anything about dyeing them - but Gazelles are my favourites and I have a few pairs, so definitely into that.

>>6360
Age / fatness are a factor here.

No. Some jeans and trousers are made with 2% elastane, which gives them a subtle stretch without the bunched-up look of an elasticated waistband.

>>6354
>his whole career working towards bringing radical socialist change

Before becoming Labour leader what had he actually achieved in that respect?

>>6355

That's like asking what an astronaut had actually achieved up to the point of stepping onto the rocket.

>>6354

Corbyn has achieved a remarkable amount, and what's interesting in the UK is that figures like Corbyn tend to highlight the ugliest aspects of our political system and media just by existing. The electorate response was not as simple as "lol nope", it took a concentrated campaign to paint eminently sensible and popular policies as tethered to someone who was inept, a security risk, a racist antisemite, a terrorist sympathiser, a communist, a poor dresser, whatever else. Every personality-based and emotional provocative button had to be pushed in a very cynical fashion, and it was so explicit that large sections of society can either no longer ignore it, or have caught onto the game for the very first time. I imagine it was pretty eye opening to the younger generation.

This kind of thing is hard to measure, but what Corbyn and the 2019 version of Labour represented probably isn't going to die, but take a new form. This can go one of many ways, and I think the worst would be to follow in the footsteps of the U.S., where electoral politics becomes increasingly meaningless in terms of economic policy and the public who do bother to vote simply go for whoever makes them feel good -- a comforting Reagan, an angry Trump, an amusing Boris Johnson.

>>6357
When it comes to economic policy electoral politics in Britain has been mostly meaningless since the late 1980s. I would specifically date it to when Labour internally agreed to back entry to the European exchange rate mechanism (despite their tiny rump of Eurosceptics winning the argument that it was a terrible idea) because despite the fact it was obviously a terrible idea Labour felt the best way to buy economic credibility with the electorate was to copy the Tories inept economic policy.
(Cynically, perhaps they were right: When the ERM imploded who remembered that Labour's policy was the same?)

2017 is a possible exception where the electorate got a real and viable choice for change (if you only look at the polls and the result) but I find it hard to believe Labour would've actually voted through its own budgets had it won.

>>6357

>Corbyn has achieved a remarkable amount

Cheers Jez!

Needle, thread and some old fabric of a similar colour. S'not hard to repair, just run 2 parallel backstitches about 1cm from the tear.

>>6342
Buying clothes online is an absolute ballache, however you can can 100% (man made) cotton joggers for cheap as fuck from the likes of TK Maxx and Sports Direct.

You can also buy organic cotton ones from elsewhere online. They are the comfiest at home trousers I've ever bought. Tracksuit trousers are also surprisingly warm and very comfortable.

>>6344

>>6345
I was going to post a gif but couldn't find a good enough one.

>>/b/441881 here,
I've started using tshirt rags as flannels, but they're very thin and the same ones i wipe my dick with. A torn towel is in order.
Checking the cupboards has revealed years worth of christmas grooming products, some of them suprisingly good quality - I'll be using these over the coming weeks.

>>/b/441901
Thanks for recommending that, i appreciate it.

>>6337

Have you ever stopped and thought about why you are like this?

>>6338
Because the plumbing in his house is fucked, he already said.

>>6339
That doesn't affect flannel-availability does it?

>>6340
Depends what he's using to plug the leaks.

>>6329

Only suits we're wearing these days are tracksuits lad.

>>6329

That one signals a very specific lifestyle, if you are Wes Anderson or don't mind being mistaken for him by all means.

If your mates don't expect that kind of style from you they will probably take the piss, if they do it will be entirely accepted. Put it another way.. How middle class are you? I mean everyone thinks they are middle class, but are you actually REALLY middle class, the kind who are incapable of reverse snobbery.

>>6329

If you have to ask, you're not stylish enough to pull it off. Sorry, that's just how it is. Ease yourself in gently with a couple of jaunty blazers for your summer wardrobe and see how you go.

>>6329
If you have a darker skin tone I reckon it would work, but you risk looking like your texture's failed to load if you're the same colour as the suit.

>>6333

My sister spent a fiver on a silky face mask in almost the exact same tone of pink of that suit, she seemed very proud of it until I told her that it made her look like the main character from the "I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream", she hasn't worn it since.

This thread gives me the shivers.

I have begun plucking my balls and the base of my benis. I do 50 hairs a day which takes about 3 minutes. In a few weeks the whole area should be clear and I intend to keep doing this and keep my balls hairless.

Thank you for reading my thread.

When it comes to the sack, back, and crack areas I find that chemical hair removal creams (like "Nair") are the most practical solution. You have to be very careful not to leave it on too long due to the sensitivity of the skin in that area, but it's very little effort to scrape away after the cream has done its work.

>benis
Anyone else suspect this is the same as the DIY-circumcision/sandpaper bellend?

>>6292

please call me the benis-improver

(A good day to you Sir!)

>>6283
It bothers me how much this speech resembles Max Ehrmann's Desiderata poem. It's not so much the content, but how similar their names are too.

>>6282
>I use a few drops of pure jojoba oil to moisturise.
>It's more effective than any cream/lotion moisturiser I've tried, and cheaper than most.

I picked some of this up recently to see what all the fuss is about. It's okay but seems like people are selling it as a cure for everything when really it's just faintly smelly oil.

There was a suggestion I read that a bit in your hair makes it shine. Well, let me tell you, putting oil in your hair will make it shine but not necessarily in a way you'd want. I might try the suggestion that it's good for shaving but I'm not bloody cooking with it.

As a longhair metalhead type for whom my luscious hair has always been my primary pulling technique, I can't recommend Argan oil enough. It's my secret weapon.

A few squirts before you brush or comb and your hair will be lavish like those wierdly erotic shampoo ads with all the little vitamin molecules wierdly floating into the hair.

>>6286
The dapper bloke at my local newsie recommended this. Shall be trying.

>>6286
I have some argan oil and had to try using different amounts, it always just seems to make my hair greasy, even with the smallest bit. Am I somehow doing something wrong or is my hair just weird? I suppose it's not going to work for everybody.

>>6276
Depends on how risky the surgery is I guess. I did similar for some expensive dentistry many years ago, but I knew the country where I was going, very well indeed. ie if it went wrong and I needed local help or treatment, I knew I could get it and it was pretty easy for me to evaluate the dentist offering it. It was half the price of doing it in the UK and I don't regret it at all - how well do you know Prague?

>>6277

I've never been there. I'd take out medical insurance for the trip. What else would I need to do?

>>6270

Not if you want to be sure there are no scraggly bits at the back and you've done the bits around your ears properly.

>>6271
You get that with practice - the first couple of times its a bit of a horror show, but people soon point it out and you get the hang of it.

>>6272

Also, you can feel it. It should be really obvious if you're doing a razor shave, and at least quite easy to tell with clippers/shaver.

>>6273

It's not that obvious.

>>6272
Buy a second mirror you can use to check the back of your head (or use the camera view on your apple watch to scout out the area) and you'll be fine. As others have mentioned, pay attention to the area around your ears (behind the ears in particular), if using clippers there's really no harm in going over an area several times to make sure. Feel your scalp "against the grain", you'll need to figure out which way your hair grows, and you can find bits you clearly missed.

Your hair generally grows forwards on top of your head, downwards at the back and sides of your head and then you get the really nasty worly area where those directions meet. The large bits that grow in one direction are easy, the borders are what you need to pay the most attention to. With clippers you'll get nothing going one way, then change your angle slightly and you get a whole carpet's worth. Rub in circles to find what you missed.

If all else fails, you can use your phone to film a 360 view of your head, using as many angles as you can, to find missing spots. With a bit of practice, though, you'll know your problem areas and automatically pay extra attention.

>>6257
If it's holiday clothes, then go to TK MAxx or Sports Direct. Maybe take one nice short sleeve shirt with you and a pair of sensible shorts in case you end up at dinner somewhere.

>>6257
This is literally why Gap exists.

>>6261
I thought they shut down pretty much all of their stores?

>>6258

I was forced to buy a load of new jeans and trousers a while back because they all seem to have inexplicably shrunk around the waist. I still have a load of tops I've been wearing since I was about 19 though.

>>6263

I have concert shirts I got at 14 which still fit me 15 years later.

It works out a hell of a lot cheaper, you can get a better shave, but there is a learning curve. A multi-blade cartridge razor is designed to give you a decent shave even if you're completely cack-handed, but it takes a bit of practice to shave well with a safety razor. You don't need to spend a fortune - this kit costs less than £15 and is perfectly good to try out DE shaving. There are loads of decent tutorials on YouTube.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Shaving-Factory-SF289-Double-Safety/dp/B004EG24HI/

>>6056
> Are they really better?
Somewhat.
The razors are cheaper than cartridges, sometimes drastically.
Using a straight razor requires slightly more agility than the multi-blade thingy - it's easier to nick yourself.
I find that it shaves cleaner than the multi-blade, I don't have to make several passes over most areas of my bony face.

Sage because I usually don't faff with it, electric shaver does the job even if it's not quite perfect.

I swallowed the trad shaving bait the other week. I blame lockdown boredom.

I haven't got the technique yet, but I think shave quality will be okay once I do. The razor itself is a nice object, and lobbing less plastic away will save the dolphins or something.
It's not a revelation of shaving bliss, but I'm coming from the one blade Bic disposables. I might be more enthusiastic if I'd been using the multi blade things.

I like the shaving soap and brush more than the canned gel. I think I'll stick with it even if I drop the razor. It smells nice, and there's a lot of choice, but you might end up like the shaving forum mentalists with rooms full of the stuff if you're not careful.

I forgot I even made this thread.

I got a safety razor, and it's much better than the cartridge ones I was using before, and a hell of a lot cheaper since a pack of 10 really good quality blades is only a fiver.

I too feel the need to recommend safety razors. It's funny to me that it's a hobby to some chaps, but the upside of that is that there's actually a lot of information out there for it. I never even thought about it, but there's reviews even for the razor blades.

I realise this thread has reached its conclusion already, but it really is much better than your typical multiblade, and if you start with a "mild" razor, and watch a video or two on proper technique, you'll probably not actually suffer any injury.

I've only really been using one regularly since about March, but I can reliably shave even my head completely smooth with no hassle at all. You definitely have to go a bit slower than a Mach3 but not so much that it's an inconvenience. And not to be one of them wankers, but it does feel more of an occasion, I truly do enjoy the process in a way I never did before.