[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
sheds

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply [First 100 posts]
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 13515)
Message
File  []
close
SAUSAGE.jpg
135151351513515
>> ID: 7389f1 No. 13515 Anonymous
10th December 2015
Thursday 8:44 pm

ID: 7389f1
13515 Silly Sausage Thread
Ban appeals, supplication and fry-ups.
Expand all images.
>> ID: 759e31 No. 13516 Anonymous
10th December 2015
Thursday 8:50 pm

ID: 759e31
13516 spacer
That sausage to fork ratio looks off, to me.
>> ID: 964e03 No. 13517 Anonymous
10th December 2015
Thursday 9:51 pm

ID: 964e03
13517 spacer
I'm permabanned on my office PC with a static IP for posting a link in /iq/ to some pointless fuckabout website. I'd complain, because it was definitely within a standard deviation of the average thread quality of /iq/, but I've actually gotten something like four chapters of my thesis written since.

Thanks, shape-shifting reptilians, you stopped me from being as much of a silly sausage.
>> ID: 7389f1 No. 13518 Anonymous
10th December 2015
Thursday 10:20 pm

ID: 7389f1
13518 spacer
>>13517

Probably flagged as spam.
>> ID: db9398 No. 13523 Anonymous
11th December 2015
Friday 7:26 am

ID: db9398
13523 spacer

SPAM UP.jpg
135231352313523
>>13518
>> ID: 612f62 No. 13524 Anonymous
11th December 2015
Friday 4:30 pm

ID: 612f62
13524 spacer
Why can't I access /A/?
>> ID: 7389f1 No. 13528 Anonymous
11th December 2015
Friday 6:06 pm

ID: 7389f1
13528 spacer
>>13524

Some boards are blocked to foreign IPs for legal reasons/It's a conspiracy. It depends on who you ask.
>> ID: 964e03 No. 13535 Anonymous
12th December 2015
Saturday 1:29 am

ID: 964e03
13535 spacer
>>13518
Can I have it reversed, then, please? I'm fed up of getting erections at my desk from Supernanny.
>> ID: 7389f1 No. 13536 Anonymous
12th December 2015
Saturday 8:04 am

ID: 7389f1
13536 spacer
>>13535

It shows a 503 forbidden, not a ban page. Nice try, though.
>> ID: 6a67df No. 13537 Anonymous
12th December 2015
Saturday 2:53 pm

ID: 6a67df
13537 spacer
>>13536
Forbidden is 403, you fat-handed twat.
>> ID: 964e03 No. 13538 Anonymous
12th December 2015
Saturday 4:22 pm

ID: 964e03
13538 spacer
>>13536
No, it definitely tells me I'm banned forever.
>> ID: 7389f1 No. 13539 Anonymous
12th December 2015
Saturday 5:11 pm

ID: 7389f1
13539 spacer
>>13538

Ok then, mystery solved.
>> ID: 612f62 No. 13548 Anonymous
13th December 2015
Sunday 9:09 pm

ID: 612f62
13548 spacer
>>13528
"Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /A/ on this server."

Any ideas?
>> ID: 6a67df No. 13553 Anonymous
13th December 2015
Sunday 10:09 pm

ID: 6a67df
13553 spacer
>>13548
Do you still geofag to the US?
>> ID: 612f62 No. 13556 Anonymous
14th December 2015
Monday 12:11 am

ID: 612f62
13556 spacer
>>13553
Still? Only >>13524 and >>13548 was me.

Anyway, no, I don't, and I could access the other boards fine. Unblocked now, so thanks.
>> ID: 710a06 No. 13558 Anonymous
14th December 2015
Monday 5:22 pm

ID: 710a06
13558 spacer
Slightly off topic, but I am on a work computer. I noticed 5 separate posts on /sentry/ from different parts of Malaysia.

This is of interest to me as I will be in Malaysia over the next couple of weeks. I will be fucking busy, but was wondering whether .gs will be available to me.
>> ID: ae268c No. 13559 Anonymous
14th December 2015
Monday 5:30 pm

ID: ae268c
13559 spacer
>>13558
Everything but the porn.
>> ID: d7bb1f No. 13561 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 1:42 pm

ID: d7bb1f
13561 spacer
Could the m0dz please stop locking so many threads? If it's vacuous trash reminiscent of the other place fair enough, but just because the OP of >>/b/398357 is a pathetic excuse for an adult doesn't mean the entire thread needs to shut down. We're not being actively damaged by discussing the matter. Then again it did belong in /emo/ anyway. Point is, if you think about it, posters being twats have resulted in some of the most entertaining events in the history of .gs.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: 376958 No. 13562 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 2:12 pm

ID: 376958
13562 spacer
>>13561

I'm of the school of thought that you need discourse to create stimulation. If when someone posted something everyone agreed with it, although that is a good post the conversation comes to a halt pretty rapidly and offers no new knowledge, or experience. The thread you mentioned being a good example of a view which creates discourse.
>> ID: 7389f1 No. 13563 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 2:13 pm

ID: 7389f1
13563 spacer
>>13561

If you stop dodging wordfilters and put your threads in the correct boards, we'll stop locking them and banning you.
>> ID: c1c78a No. 13564 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 2:22 pm

ID: c1c78a
13564 spacer
>>13561
>posters being twats have resulted in some of the most entertaining events in the history of .gs.

Twats like bike thief and crab killer or wonks like ambulancelad and the lad who freaked out because his mum asked him to order a takeaway and he didn't know how had a certain level of gravitas or endearment.

The OP of that thread was just an arseclown.
>> ID: 7389f1 No. 13565 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 2:58 pm

ID: 7389f1
13565 spacer
It needs to be said, regardless of the arseclownery of the OP as that isn't what he was banned for; wrongthink is not a punishable offence, if he had posted on /emo/ the thread would have been left alone. /emo/ threads go in /emo/ not /b/, it's as simple as that.
>> ID: 89ed24 No. 13566 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 3:02 pm

ID: 89ed24
13566 spacer
>>13564

This is true to a point, but I think it's a slipper slope and before you know it you have Nepali cunts spamming pie threads and telling everyone how they are are posting from Nepal.
>> ID: 4ed52e No. 13567 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 3:07 pm

ID: 4ed52e
13567 spacer
>>13563
Your wordfilters are shite, and I haven't started a thread in months, let alone in the wrong board. Anyway I do have things to do today so maybe a day off of .gs would do me good, cheers m@dm8s
>> ID: 607023 No. 13568 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 3:07 pm

ID: 607023
13568 spacer

357-clarkson.jpg
135681356813568
>>13566

>I think it's a slipper slope and before you know it you have Nepali cunts spamming pie threads and telling everyone how they are are posting from Nepal.

What do you call a Nepalese man wearing a warm indoor shoe?

A slipper slope


(My apologies for posting that in /shed/)
>> ID: e09ba8 No. 13569 Anonymous
15th December 2015
Tuesday 3:22 pm

ID: e09ba8
13569 spacer

what.jpg
135691356913569
>>13566
>> ID: 82b741 No. 13575 Anonymous
13th January 2016
Wednesday 6:49 pm

ID: 82b741
13575 spacer

Screenshot_2016-01-13-18-39-07.png
135751357513575
Not a proxy, just posting from mobile.
>> ID: ae268c No. 13576 Anonymous ## Mod ##
13th January 2016
Wednesday 7:42 pm

ID: ae268c
13576 spacer
>>13575
That happens to me, too. I decided to put up with it as the mobile networks were routinely used to post CP spam. It's a pain in the arse but I'd rather wait until I get home to post than risk more CP being posted.
>> ID: 82b741 No. 13577 Anonymous
13th January 2016
Wednesday 8:10 pm

ID: 82b741
13577 spacer
>>13576
Fair enough but does the ban really have to be indefinite, then?
>> ID: ae268c No. 13578 Anonymous
13th January 2016
Wednesday 8:37 pm

ID: ae268c
13578 spacer
>>13577

Yes, unless you have a better solution?

"din" whoever you are, if you know what posts in /x/ are child pornography then you should probably report them for deletion instead of bragging about it on a connection that can be traced back to you personally. Moron.
>> ID: 230b52 No. 13579 Anonymous
13th January 2016
Wednesday 8:57 pm

ID: 230b52
13579 spacer
>* din (dindin@7C60E300.F2386D93.30738E0A.IP) has joined
><din> well
><din> because of the way posting and reporting posts corresponds
><din> i can't actually report anything on /x/ with a foriegn IP
><din> remember, foreigners arent allowed to go there
><din> and i have always dilligently reported that shit because i don't want it on there
><din> you lot are just pissy because you're all lazy drunkards on the dole
><shape-shifting reptilian> but you can view it?
><din> and you know, actually stopping people from getting in trouble might fall in your purview
><din> but you'd fail ont hat end
><din> yeah
><din> i remember reporting shit before and it would go away
><shape-shifting reptilian> you can view a thread that was way past the first page despite that being forbidden to foreigners in exactly the same way as the report function is?
><din> i'm fairly certain i did report it some time ago anyway
><din> but i don't know if the thing would go through
><din> i remember finding the magical thread
><shape-shifting reptilian> We're generally over-cautious in removing anything that might be CP, if you had reported it, it would have gone
><din> well that entire thread should be disappeared tbh
><shape-shifting reptilian> it has been
><din> porn is horrible
><din> bye
><din> oh wait, i'd also appreciate it if you deleted the post referring to me
><shape-shifting reptilian> that's why you try so hard to bypass the wall to view the x boards is it?
><shape-shifting reptilian> you're not making a lot of sense right now mate
><din> i have to impose my sense of morality on others
><din> to ensure that i can keep due dilligence against such crimes, i keep my eye on the entire pornography industry
><shape-shifting reptilian> that's cool, I'll impose mine on you by leaving the post up then. thanks for drawing my attention to the thread, all the same.
><din> :(
>* din has quit (Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client)

Please, if you know or suspect a post to be of child pornography, report it for deletion rather than making yourself complicit in the viewing and production of it. Or rather than being a complete nutcase.
>> ID: 82b741 No. 13580 Anonymous
13th January 2016
Wednesday 9:46 pm

ID: 82b741
13580 spacer
>>13578
I'm just saying how do you know that IP is going to be used to post CP forever and ever? I presume the posters of it are smart and dedicated enough to realise they need to change IPs frequently, even if they could somehow hold onto a single mobile network IP for themselves - and we know that they can't because I got assigned it today.

>making yourself complicit in the viewing and production of it
Oh please don't try and scare us with this pseudolegal nonsense. By this logic, reporting it would be essentially sending you evidence you could pass onto the police that we have, in fact, viewed it and reproduced it on our screen, so it would actually be against our own interests to do so.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: 4b8381 No. 13581 Anonymous
16th January 2016
Saturday 7:13 pm

ID: 4b8381
13581 spacer
>>13580

>reporting it would be essentially sending you evidence you could pass onto the police that we have, in fact, viewed it and reproduced it on our screen, so it would actually be against our own interests to do so

This is truth. The only sensible thing to do if you see CP is browse away and tell nobody.
>> ID: c24914 No. 13582 Anonymous
16th January 2016
Saturday 7:15 pm

ID: c24914
13582 spacer
>>13581
The site would record that you viewed it and didn't report it, making you complicit in its distribution.
>> ID: ae75c9 No. 13583 Anonymous
17th January 2016
Sunday 12:34 am

ID: ae75c9
13583 spacer
>>13582

Just because a hyperlink for an image was visited doesn't mean that the content was actually displayed on the screen.
>> ID: 165961 No. 13584 Anonymous
17th January 2016
Sunday 3:22 am

ID: 165961
13584 spacer
>>13582
>>13583
The whole "displayed on the screen" thing only comes into play if you have your cache disabled.
>> ID: 998895 No. 13585 Anonymous
17th January 2016
Sunday 12:54 pm

ID: 998895
13585 spacer
>>13582

I don't see how that could possibly be the mens rea and actus reus, that would mean that if someone set up an enormous poster in a public place of kiddy fiddling everyone who viewed it would be guilty of viewing child porn. That is of course assuming people are even aware they are seeing child porn. which I assume in most of the instances that would occur on britfags and not cleaned up immediately would be where people reasonably assumed they were over 18.
>> ID: 5a1ca7 No. 13586 Anonymous
17th January 2016
Sunday 1:30 pm

ID: 5a1ca7
13586 spacer
>>13585
The press don't care about things like mens rea. As far as they're concerned the police have nicked a wrong'un, and he's trying to weasel his way out of it.
>> ID: f009cc No. 13587 Anonymous
18th January 2016
Monday 2:35 pm

ID: f009cc
13587 spacer
>>13585
The example you give is different, because it's only the person who made and distributed the poster that is guilty of an offence. As >>13583 and >>13584 have said, in this case when we're discussing "viewing" images, we are (I think) referring to the offence "making" an indecent image, which precedent has held includes "causing an image to appear on a screen". So by loading the page in your browser, you have caused the image to appear on your monitor and thus have "made an indecent image". Plus of course the file in your cache counts as possession.

The people looking at the poster, by contrast, have neither made nor possess the image in any legal sense of those words.
>> ID: 4732ca No. 13588 Anonymous
18th January 2016
Monday 3:22 pm

ID: 4732ca
13588 spacer
>>13587
>So by loading the page in your browser, you have caused the image to appear on your monitor and thus have "made an indecent image".
This is such a load of bollocks. Not you claiming it, but that this is the way things are.
>> ID: 8e591d No. 13589 Anonymous
18th January 2016
Monday 3:44 pm

ID: 8e591d
13589 spacer
>>13588
This interpretation was dreamt up as a specific anti-loophole for a case of someone who had deliberately visited a site and deliberately viewed the images, but deliberately disabled caching in the browser. It came around the same time that people were openly calling individuals working at ISPs "child pornographers in chief". I think it may have been the same case that prompted the swift creation of an exemption for law enforcement.
>> ID: 10386f No. 13590 Anonymous
18th January 2016
Monday 4:11 pm

ID: 10386f
13590 spacer
>>13589

No doubt the Masons had something to do with that. Tracing the board? More like tracing the outline of the dead, nonced child while on the phone to the Grand Master confirming if he was, indeed, accounted for all Saturday night.

Oh, wait. This is a ban appeal thread in /shed/. What a silly sausage I am.
>> ID: 66d57b No. 13591 Anonymous
18th January 2016
Monday 4:52 pm

ID: 66d57b
13591 spacer
Whatever. Just report shit for deletion for the sake of not being a cunt.
>> ID: 914a2f No. 13597 Anonymous
2nd February 2016
Tuesday 10:00 pm

ID: 914a2f
13597 spacer
>>13515
>>13515
Mercy, lads. One whole week is a long time. The guy I work for makes in a day what I make in a whole week. This is triggering me.
>> ID: 914a2f No. 13598 Anonymous
2nd February 2016
Tuesday 10:01 pm

ID: 914a2f
13598 spacer
>>13597
>>/emo/22539
>> ID: 0ff111 No. 13599 Anonymous
4th February 2016
Thursday 1:50 am

ID: 0ff111
13599 spacer
>>/x/40106

A whole week! for posting "foreign' memes"‽ A week for what is surely a slap on the wrist offense? I demand justice! JUSTICE!
>> ID: ae268c No. 13600 Anonymous
4th February 2016
Thursday 1:58 am

ID: ae268c
13600 spacer
>>13599
Keep it in your trousers next time.
>> ID: 9a4ad1 No. 13601 Anonymous
4th February 2016
Thursday 2:23 am

ID: 9a4ad1
13601 spacer
>>13600

Sir! the fact that the right honorable shape-shifting reptilian, who I assumed banned me. Had made clear it was a 'definite would' in their mind, implies it is not the issue that I had taken it out of my trousers. If anything it appears the issue was that I hadn't!
>> ID: ae268c No. 13602 Anonymous
4th February 2016
Thursday 2:26 am

ID: ae268c
13602 spacer
>>13601
You've already been unbanned you prat. The original ban length was 1 second.
>> ID: b180bd No. 13603 Anonymous
4th February 2016
Thursday 4:58 am

ID: b180bd
13603 spacer
>>13599
>>13602

Well meme'd shape-shifting reptilianm8s. I wish we had more epic mem- sorry I meant 'inside jokes' and genuinely hilarious jokes on this imageboard that totally isn't a chan.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: b78689 No. 13604 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 11:01 am

ID: b78689
13604 spacer
You have been banned from posting on all boards for the following reason:

Will you ever learn? >>/v/20368

It depends, is it a grammar issue? It usually is, but I'm blind to them so I can't tell.
>> ID: e09ba8 No. 13605 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 7:04 pm

ID: e09ba8
13605 spacer
>>13604
>I'm blind to them

So what precisely then would be the point of explaining it to you?
>> ID: c7c3be No. 13606 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 8:10 pm

ID: c7c3be
13606 spacer
Does that sausage look a bit phallic to anyone else? When I scroll past it's easy to mistake the right end for glans.
>> ID: ed3bf0 No. 13607 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 8:31 pm

ID: ed3bf0
13607 spacer

Screenshot_2016-02-14-20-26-44-1-1.jpg
136071360713607
>>13515
This is a bit excessive. I feel like I'm being targeted and bullied.
>> ID: ae268c No. 13608 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 8:36 pm

ID: ae268c
13608 spacer

Lengths.png
136081360813608
>>13604
>is it a grammar issue?
I would assume so, but the ban had expired by the time I saw your comment earlier today so I'm not sure why you mind - unless it was removed.

>>13606
Don't most sausages look phallic?

>>13607
Judging by image related, you got off lightly.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13609 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 9:00 pm

ID: 439c00
13609 spacer
>>13607

>bullied

Fuck, someone phone ACAS.
>> ID: 78c44b No. 13610 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 9:18 pm

ID: 78c44b
13610 spacer
You'll have to clue me in, shape-shifting reptilians. What's 'tedious and /pol/ about discussing the protests about the 'male and pale' BAFTAs, especially in light of similar protests/controversy about the Oscars and Grammys?

Now if I'd posted something inflammatory or you thought we're mindless racists then I could sort of see where you'd be coming from, but I hope neither of those were the case. Then again, I have heard that at least one shape-shifting reptilian is overzealous in respect of shutting down debate they don't like.
>> ID: ae268c No. 13611 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 9:18 pm

ID: ae268c
13611 spacer
>>13610
>Why is it only black people who seem to take umbrage at this and is this just going to keep going?
>> ID: 010990 No. 13612 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 9:26 pm

ID: 010990
13612 spacer
>>13611
In my opinion that's not inflammatory and that certainly wasn't my intent if that's how you feel. It's a genuine curiosity as to why it only seems to be black people who complain over this. I'm quite naïve when it comes to race.

Besides, I think you should trust the rest of the user base to call me out if I'm being out of line rather than stifling the discussion altogether. Please don't permaban EE again.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13613 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 9:27 pm

ID: 439c00
13613 spacer
>>13610

>I have heard

What is it about this particular phrase that pretty much guarantees that the proceeding sentence will be conjecture and that the poster wont cite their sources?
>> ID: ae268c No. 13614 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 9:29 pm

ID: ae268c
13614 spacer
>>13612
Your opinion is not relevant.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13616 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 9:44 pm

ID: 439c00
13616 spacer
>>13612


Just my tuppence's' worth, but It sounds like you want Carte Blanche to bait the user base and start flame wars, not create discussion like you claim. Are you that mentalistlad we keep hearing about?

The shape-shifting reptilians exist specifically to stop shit like that from happening, or at least ideally they do, so in deleting a thread which leads with "Why are blacks so thin skinned?" what are they doing that is draconian or oppressive? That certainly doesn't imply constructive discussion to me.

Have a fucking whinge there, cuz.
>> ID: b78689 No. 13617 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 10:34 pm

ID: b78689
13617 spacer
>>13605

that I may see
>> ID: d000d1 No. 13619 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 10:44 pm

ID: d000d1
13619 spacer
>>13613
It'll be elsewhere on /shed/. I think there's been at least two or three occasions, but the most notorious one was when the entire EE network was permabanned because someone posted an innocuous link about an Asian child grooming gang in the Rotherham thread, which certainly wasn't offensive in any way and simply stated the facts. IIRC the shape-shifting reptilian's justification was that someone else was being racist, which was true because they ended up having a massive teary over it, so all debate must be silenced because of patterns of posts.

>>13616
I see your point. I'm not the mentalist but I was probably a bit rash and didn't think through how I'd worded the thread. Honesty, I wasn't trying to start a cunt-off over race.
>> ID: 05e1f0 No. 13620 Anonymous
14th February 2016
Sunday 11:50 pm

ID: 05e1f0
13620 spacer
>>13616
>Why are blacks so thin skinned?
Is that seriously what it said? Fucking hell, keep it up shape-shifting reptilians.
>> ID: a360fc No. 13621 Anonymous ## Mod ##
14th February 2016
Sunday 11:57 pm

ID: a360fc
13621 spacer
Please stop banning that huge subnet, at least until admin whitelists my IP. Cheers.
>> ID: e701d0 No. 13622 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 12:18 am

ID: e701d0
13622 spacer
>>13621
During the most raucous period of the Cultural Revolution, the Red Guards had turned on their own leadership and denounced them. I suspect something similar has happened in this communist dictatorship. Ha.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13623 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 12:20 am

ID: 439c00
13623 spacer
>>13621

Does maroon have the only key to the shed or something? What a strange situation.
>> ID: 05e1f0 No. 13624 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 12:36 am

ID: 05e1f0
13624 spacer
>>13623
Now I'm picturing purple yelling and banging on the door a la Fred Flintstone.
>> ID: a360fc No. 13625 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 12:51 am

ID: a360fc
13625 spacer
>>13623

OOPS. My colour tag was a bit off, apparently. That's supposed to be indigo.

Please don't behead me for impersonating the king.
>> ID: 64a8c4 No. 13627 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 1:17 am

ID: 64a8c4
13627 spacer
>>13626
That should be a semicolon, not a full colon.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13629 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 1:37 am

ID: 439c00
13629 spacer
>>13627

Audible mirth. What makes it unsuitable in that context?
>> ID: e09ba8 No. 13630 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:03 am

ID: e09ba8
13630 spacer
>>13627
Yeah good luck with that one mate, he can't even work out the past participle of "to go".
>> ID: 05e1f0 No. 13631 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:04 am

ID: 05e1f0
13631 spacer
>>13625
>>13626
Who the fuck is indigo? And I thought shape-shifting reptilians were only allowed to post in red? What is going on? Is the site still called britfa.gs?

Also
>I've went
Ban yourself forever.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13632 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:12 am

ID: 439c00
13632 spacer
>>13631

I thought there was a bloody coup happening before my very eyes. You'll have to forgive me for slipping into regional colloquialism in the heat of the moment.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13633 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:14 am

ID: 439c00
13633 spacer
>>13631

P.S.

>Who the fuck is indigo?

http://britfa.gs/help/
>> ID: 64a8c4 No. 13634 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:14 am

ID: 64a8c4
13634 spacer
>>13629
Full colons are for plural, semicolons are for singular.
>> ID: 05e1f0 No. 13636 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:19 am

ID: 05e1f0
13636 spacer
>>13633
Yeah, there's no indigo there genius.
>> ID: e09ba8 No. 13638 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:22 am

ID: e09ba8
13638 spacer

everythingispermitted.png
136381363813638
>>13636
>> ID: 89806e No. 13639 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:24 am

ID: 89806e
13639 spacer
Look at all this petty infighting. And this is the group of teenagers who decide what gets put up on here and what doesn't. Ban the lot of them I say.
>> ID: a360fc No. 13640 Anonymous
15th February 2016
Monday 2:38 am

ID: a360fc
13640 spacer
>>13636

Well that's hurt my feelings.

>>13639

There's no infighting. If there was I'd have already challenged him to a duel.
>> ID: 290d49 No. 13642 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 12:39 am

ID: 290d49
13642 spacer

banned.png
136421364213642
Well this is annoying as I definitely wasn't posting from a proxy, as a simple whois lookup of the IP in question would have revealed. At least two posts of mine were deleted too; although if this is some kind of hatchet job I would have preferred that to be made clear in the ban message rather than the ineffectively nebulous 'Proxy'.

Sigh.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13643 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 12:44 am

ID: 439c00
13643 spacer
>>13642

How is Brazil this time of year?
>> ID: 290d49 No. 13644 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 12:46 am

ID: 290d49
13644 spacer
>>13643

I would say something about "30 degree heat" but I'd hate to be tarred with the same brush as HongKongLad.
>> ID: 60c736 No. 13645 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 12:48 am

ID: 60c736
13645 spacer
>>13642
I don't understand why you think a WHOIS result can indicate the absence of a proxy server.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13646 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 12:51 am

ID: 439c00
13646 spacer
>>13644

Saying anything at all, rather than deflecting, would be a great start.
>> ID: 290d49 No. 13648 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 12:56 am

ID: 290d49
13648 spacer
>>13645
I guess because most proxies are hosted on servers not on home internet ISP ranges. That said, a simpler way to prove the absence of a proxy server would be a simple port scan. I wonder if this was an automated ban because I have to reset my ADSL router three or four times a day.

>>13646

That wasn't a deflection, it was a joke about it being hot but not wanting to moan/brag (delete as appropriate) about it. Brazil's a pretty big country but up here in the north-east it's bloody hot, and will continue to be until about April when it'll be slightly less hot but a hell of a lot rainier.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13649 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 1:06 am

ID: 439c00
13649 spacer
>>13648

You are greatly over estimating what a whois lookup is capable of revealing to a non-native about a foreign IP range.

I've seen you posting from Brazil for a while now and you've not really done anything ban worthy, however I can't whitelist your IP as that is an admin level function and your ban will need to remain in place as The Wall is effectively up for the foreseeable future.

Anyone else looking to post from a foreign IP will have to get whitelisted by an admin as we've had more child porn posted. Sorry folks, blame the arseholes who post this shit.
>> ID: ae268c No. 13650 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 1:08 am

ID: ae268c
13650 spacer
>>13648
Over a dozen IPs from actual proxies were banned in the last 24 hours. You were included in that because you were posting from a remote location during the spate. That's all.
>> ID: 290d49 No. 13651 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 1:13 am

ID: 290d49
13651 spacer
>>13649
>>13650

Totally understandable, no one wants CP on here. Just checked banned.php and I seem to be unbanned again so cheers lads.
>> ID: ae268c No. 13652 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 1:15 am

ID: ae268c
13652 spacer
>>13651
No problem. Sorry about the mix-up.
>> ID: 96d4c8 No. 13653 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 10:44 am

ID: 96d4c8
13653 spacer
Not him but wondering what >>/e/21412 was banned for? I see nothing spelling and grammar-wise and the post itself is of course a Day Today reference.
>> ID: 439c00 No. 13654 Anonymous
18th February 2016
Thursday 7:31 pm

ID: 439c00
13654 spacer
>>13653

The site was hacked by a drunken Gerry Adams.
>> ID: a98fb9 No. 13671 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 8:42 pm

ID: a98fb9
13671 spacer
In the Europe thread somebody has been banned for the Americanisation in the spelling of defence I presume, but you've done nothing to:

A) The lad accusing everybody of dolphin rape (although I can understand you leaving this if perhaps just to let him be entitled to his opinion).
B) The lads completely shitting it up by talking like edgy 'lEL So Randumb XD' 15 year olds about babies and how well they like them done.

I'm just wondering why the discrepancy?
>> ID: 4372b0 No. 13672 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 9:18 pm

ID: 4372b0
13672 spacer
>>13671

No one reported any of the other posts. Even if they did there is no guarantee we'd have done anything.

It's not our job to police people's opinions, despite a few mentalists claiming otherwise which is no secret, so from that point forward it's not a massive leap of logic to assume either we didn't see it or we consider bad spelling and grammar tantamount to posting Child Pornography.

Perhaps, we don't even care. Delete as applicable to fit your own personal bias. Why do you care?
>> ID: 58057f No. 13673 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 9:25 pm

ID: 58057f
13673 spacer
>>13672

>Why do you care?

Not them, but people resent what they consider unfair treatment, particularly by those with power.
>> ID: a98fb9 No. 13674 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 9:36 pm

ID: a98fb9
13674 spacer

154f4e3b63131fd1ae366aa1b5825c8f.jpg
136741367413674
>>13672

>Why do you care?

It'd be nice if the website owners (for which I am genuinely grateful for providing this website) would perhaps not waste their time being supercilious about spelling and perhaps stop people turning threads into the equivalent of 'the other place', as people post random videos of babies and talk shit about how they like the colour of different races of baby.

Just seems to take away from the content and seems ridiculous, as ridiculous as this place can be, that you'd ban somebody over a letter difference but not ban people posting absolute drivel about cooking babies in a thread about the EU referendum.

It makes it hard to read actual content and discourages proper posting.

Perhaps you don't care, but I just don't understand why you'd care about spelling but not grossly childish behaviour, of which I'm inclined to believe is far worse than any Americanisation in spelling that comes as part of an effort to contribute.

Just my two pence. Maybe I shouldn't care, particularly if the shape-shifting reptilians are just the 'we do what we want with the power aren't we quirky' type.
>> ID: 7346b1 No. 13676 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 9:45 pm

ID: 7346b1
13676 spacer
>>13674
What is your problem with babies?
>> ID: 4372b0 No. 13677 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 9:46 pm

ID: 4372b0
13677 spacer
>>13674

>Delete as applicable to fit your own personal bias.

Facetiousness a virgin concept, lad?
>> ID: a98fb9 No. 13678 Anonymous
23rd February 2016
Tuesday 9:49 pm

ID: a98fb9
13678 spacer
>>13676

It's not a problem with babies, it's just utter shit when people are acting like teenagers saying how they like their babies more cooked, in a thread where we're trying to talk about the EU referendum. I just don't get it.

This place prides itself on having a culture unlike 4chan some days but then defends those very same characteristics the others.

(A good day to you Sir!)
116 posts omitted. First 100 posts shown.

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password